I often wonder what the chemical
Inversion aka CHEMICAL/ALCHEMY makes one wonder aka astonishes (stuns) the mind into astonishment.
Between...I bet there's all kinds a whackadoo stuff about.
Betting implies taking a side from in-between, which in return stuffs both sides together within (logic) and outside (reason) self.
Stuffing makes kindred (alike)...all (same) generates particular (difference).
a) Noble/nobilis/gno - "to know" implies all knowledge and each one coming to be known within.
b) Gas/khaos - "empty space"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/gas
c) What if coming to be known within knowledge implies delineation? What if shaping empty space (gas) during delineation (line) makes fuel (material for burning) by focusing heat?
What if circular thinking establishes an empty space within ones mind during natural delineation (inception towards death) of being (life)?
If circular thinking is based on holding artifice within ones mind; then the mind becomes an artificial cavity aka a "gas chamber".
Here's a sleight of hand... https://genius.com/Metallica-fuel-lyrics
d) What if the internal separation of flow (inception towards death) generates form (life) aka airy fluid generating coloric solid?
Notice that ISRAEL WILL was written before PROHIBITED. If the will of isreal comes first; then any interdiction by authority (prohibition) afterwards implies authorization by will of israel.
there are many...
There can be only one.
genealogies tracing
Gene (to generate) al (all) logy (logic). All generates each one within by tracing a line of progression...logic tempts one to ignore that line by circular thinking.
Trace/tractiare - "delineate" implies a line...not a circle.
heritage
- Heredity/heredis/heres/ghe - "to be empty; left behind"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/heredity
Within a line of progression...a being cannot be empty nor does anything get left behind. It's the circle shaped within a being which leaves the line behind the being, while emptying a beings mind from natural input. As in...consenting to suggested information leaves behind perceivable inspiration, while emptying the mind of the spirit of animation, hence circular thinking (logic) stagnating the thought process.
mistaken
If one takes; then one ignores all given. Taking implies missing given.
How could such a people disappear and be wholly replaced by another
Only within whole (wholly) can partial (person) shaped into a sum (people). Within a sum...each partial ignores whole, which permits another to exploit ignorance for the magic of disappearance.
If form (life) ignores flow (inception towards death) aka replacement (mind responding to place); then everything the mind ignores disappears.
In short...there never was a people (plural); only each person (singular).
historical attestation
Attestation implies nature bearing (inception towards death) the witness of being (life)...not being bearing the burden of history suggested another. Few suggest history to confine many mentally, which in return represents a witness protection program for few. While few are witnessing nature; many confine themselves to artifice.
The opposite of witness implies partaker aka a being who takes while ignoring to witness all given as a part within whole.
Lay out your evidence
Evidence aka ex (out) videre (to see)...layers prevent sight from seeing outwards. Sharing layers blankets sight manifold. Few tempt many to blind one another by sharing evidence with one another. The more evidence one holds onto; the more layers one puts upon ones sight.
Stealing Abraham
Ab (father) raham (multitude)...it's joining together into a multitude which tempts one to steal from the one and only father of singularity.
the theft of abrahamic identity by Israel!
Au contraire...israel aka yisra'el (he that striveth with God) implies each ones resistance to form multitudes with one another. A jew aka each chosen one implies apartheid... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2vb863Dw.jpg It's the suggestion of tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) which tempts gentiles into a multitude aka a melting pot aka mass migration aka multiculturalism aka the unwashed masses.
It's gentiles falling for the jewish trick of pluralism who are stealing from singularity aka who by joining together hold a consensus in possession.
Theosophy
Aka theos (one and only God) + sophy (love vs hate dualism)...choosing either sophy (love) or miso (hate) turns one against one another while denying theos.
new age religion
New/néwos (now) vs old/ald/al (to grow)...turning them against one another corrupts age/aiw (vital force). Now implies the singular procession of nature allowing each being within to grow, while new vs old implies one side turning against another within a dual/duel-conflict.
Choosing a side binds free will of choice, which represents religion/religio (to bind anew).
100% satanic
God (100%) dividing (50%) being (1%) from one another gives each one the free will of choice to deny God for one another, thereby deceiving (satan) self.
lucifer
Light > spectrum > ray...a process of separation. LUCI implies light; FER implies ray bearing the burden of one another when ignoring light.
demon-possessed-mason
Demon/dai-mon (divider; provider) implies nature providing division to being. Provided division implies process giving potential...taking into possession tempts being to ignore that.
A mason tempts the potential of a being (free will of choice) into a masonic joint aka taking information (brick) into possession by consent (mortar). This joining of brick and mortar builds a wall of ignorance within a being while confining the expression of potential outwards.
The issue with the word DEMON is holding together what the provider (MON) divides (DAI) by free will of choice.
Growing the life that has been given...taking a measure (meaning) confines the growth of mind. Inception towards death simply implies the ongoing process which allows living potential to grow within.
Problem, reaction, solution
Solution enacts; problem reacts. Problem aka pro (forward) + blem (to throw) cannot be fixed...it implies dissolution aka the division of solution into each problem.
pope criticizes tyrants
If God implies all-father; then pope (father) implies tyranny (absolute ruler without legal right).
ravage
Only during ravage (inception towards death) can one flourish (life)...
normal working people...getting their currency rugpulled
Political divide uses norms (normal) and collectivism (people) as a fictitious rug over the natural current, which pushes (inception) and pulls (death) being (life) simultaneously.
Nature works a current...few tempt many to work for artificial currency, which establishes the divide among many (poor vs rich); politically exploited by few.
get shot by illegals
The political divide (legal vs illegal) tempts both sides against each other, while ignoring that natural law sets each beings free will of choice apart from one another. It's the divide which makes aiming at one another easier.
Neverending Story
Only within the everending (inception towards death) can one come into being (life)...it's ones denial thereof for stories (fantastica) which establishes the nothing/nihilo/nial within self.
Nothing is eating everything
Logic aka circular thinking represents the ouroboros within self which consumes everything one ignores.
Erasing histories
Holding onto erases form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...letting go allows one to discern self as the insert of all aka Atreyu (the son of all) from Atreus (fearless). It's holding onto hope and fear which "stores" it within self...that's the eraser.
is the Most High God
God WAS before you can choose what the most high IS.
there are many conspiracies against Him.
There can be only one...God. It's choosing to hold onto a side which conspires one and another into a manifold against singular delineation.
What do you think of the invite?
Inception implies the invite for life to participate within God...joining one another's invites represents the conspiracy against God.
Join a forum > it splits apart > ad infinitum.
My thoughts aside...I bookmarked it. Thanks.
river pirates in the desert!
Pirate/peira/per (to try; attempt; risk) implies taking chance by given choice aka a gamble. Taking chance by giving up choice makes one a deserter aka one who deserts the river for the banks.
Pirate for good
FOR implies the river given choice in-between banks...good or bad implies the risk (pirate) tempting one to desert choice.
ship out
A ship (life) can only sail in-between coming in (inception) and out (death) the river.
conspiracy against the Most High God
MOST HIGH...that's the conspiracy within all of God by anyone who chooses a side against another (most vs least + high vs low).
the 180 degree switch on the issue
Free will of choice operates within balance aka in-between extremes. Choosing to hold onto either side encircles choice, while establishing measurable degrees.
Few shape issues to tempt many into consensus (360 degree) and reason (180 degree vs 180 degree), which is how few control 360 degree by measuring the offset (counterbalance).
Furthermore...setting an issue/exire - "exit; to go out" at the center of counterbalance establishes a way out for those setting the issue within.
Example: "vaccine skepticism"...while the cattle (vacca) reflect (skeptic) against each other; the farmer (pharma) utilizes the suggested -ism as the way out (issue). The -ism represents a consensus aka enclosure for the cattle being farmed.
Allow me to...
TO implies "towards"...that's creator giving allowance towards being. ME implies being taking possession over self, while being given allowance to be.
Notice that asking for allowance among beings turns into a conflict (allow vs deny). Asking makes answers optional, while distracting from primary origin of choice being given.
on the Creator...to the Creator
OnWARD + toWARD implies ward/wer - "to perceive; watch out for"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/ward
Drawing a circle tempts ones perception to look inwards at suggested information held onto.
turn itself
SELF implies the line moving through being, hence representing the shared value of all moving through each one aka the soul/sole.
IT implies being taking a measurement into possession, which contradicts the line into a circle. Notice also that IT neuters sexual division (he + she) and that she implies S(plit)HE aka an internal split of a line aka he moving through she to generate off-spring.
TURN/tere - "to rub"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*tere-#etymonline_v_52779 hence the conflict when establishing contradictions by shaping circles (reason) within a line (implication) and why rubbing applied to anointment establishes anti-christ.
the free will of the creation
Free will of CHOICE in-between the created balance.
creation
Crea/ker (to grow) + tion (action)...action cannot grow; only each divided reaction in-between growth/loss wields the free will of choice to grow or fail to do so.
Turning from the creator doesn't change the course of the creator...it only spins the created against each other.
Notice also that you used VS (circular) and LINE (linear) in the same sentence...that represents you sustaining the contradiction within self, while perpetuating it outwards towards others.
God's adversaries
God delineates (Creator towards creation)...ad (against) verse (to turn) implies creation vs creation.
Only within a line can a circle be shaped.
What if the names of the world were changed
Names hide change, but don't stop the world/werold aka age (old) of man (wer)...
renaming cities
Names invoke a summoning. Those who consent to names are following a call of duty, which tempts ones free will of choice into obligatory service to a chosen ones summons.
The name "city" tempts the body private into civil servitude...if consented to, which represents an enterprise (undertaking). Few dare many to undertake by tempting choice to take names.
Uniform aka sexual uniformity (unisex) aka "one size fits all" as alternative for "not everyone fits the mold"...
Without intelligent design, the 'particles' 'banging' would have demolished themselves
Christ/christen - "to anoint" implies the lubrication preventing friction in-between "banging particles" within the dividing process of whole.
Few design intelligence (understanding) as an identifying mark for many to tempt them to turn against (anti) one another, which demolishes the lubrication (christ).
The trick of Christianity (or any other group) is about tempting each christ to join one another, hence becoming anti-christ.
Particles joining together implies mutual demolition. The "banging together" aka intercourse for off-spring implies the balance act for ones reacting choice in-between the need to set apart and the want to put together.
IN (inception) and OUT (death)...only in-between can being come to life.
If there's a kabbalistic layer between reality and what we experience
The description of another becomes the layer within self, which confines experience into expiration. The layers of self imposed burdens are choking out a beings access to the source of knowledge passing through.
Whatever ones holds onto prevents one from seeing the kabbalah (cube of allah) aka the law of all cueing each being within. Those asleep ain't getting the cue while slumbering under layers of deception.
there's no way to be certain of anything
To be certain requires each beings self dis-CERN-ment...not layers of understanding by others which obscure ones mind from being within the one and only way of knowledge aka living on the edge.
...are all equally insufficient to describe the whole
A description of one to another cannot ever be all...only within all can each one come into being to shape descriptions to one another. Holding onto shaped descriptions represents the deception which equalizes differences among beings.
Nature doesn't describe (outline)...nature delineates being (life) inline (inception towards death).
likely a combination
To combine implies like vs dislike aka putting two (bi) together (com) against ONE another. Nature implies singularity; artifice implies plurality. Only each singular being wields the free will of choice to artificially combine together what nature divides from one another.
What is your evaluation of what life is about?
Value (all perceivable) moves evaluation (ones perception) into being...it's neither a possession (yours) nor a circumference (about), but a linear process moving bringing forth potential.
Few trick many to set values by holding onto them, which in return corrupts ones evaluation of moving value.
How did existence manifest?
An ex (out) stence (stance) manifests inwardly aka all energy manifesting each power within by linear progression from motion > momentum > matter.
What is life about?
About/ambhi (around)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/about Life isn't about; but centered within.
How do you make sense of your existence?
Sense implies each beings sentience while being send within nature...making represents the deception tempting a being to shape something artificial while ignoring nature for it.
What is your best estimate
Best implies versus worse...aka circular confinement of ones mind within conflict, while ignoring the power of ones mind to estimate linear procession. Only if one lets go of either extreme (best or worse) can one estimate freely.
what we are doing here
Nature does the doing which allows each being within to re-do...that's how singularity works. Few suggest pluralism (we) to tempt many together, while gaining the permission to artificially re-shape those who ignore what nature was doing.
how all of this came to be?
All was before each one within comes into being during delineation...emphasis on TO (towards) BE (being).
Christianity - God created the world and man rebelled?
Few suggest creationism (out of nothing) to invert transformation (within everything). Consenting to the former rebels against the latter, while permitting few to rebel against many. Ignoring transformation for creation shapes being into a "rebel without a cause".
Evolution - Happenstance?
a) Happenstance implies by chance...being implies as choice within balance. Few tempt many to take chance which distracts from given choice.
b) Evolution implies "to unroll"...nature delineates, which few distract from by internally (logic) and externally (reason) rolling many together aka tricking each into circular confinement, which then turns many against each other.
Other alien races exist
Alien/alius - "another" implies the position of each being within nature from one ANOTHER; while race/raddix/radius/ray implies each beings stance within all.
10000 year battle
Taking any measurement tempts ones mind into a battle (give vs take).
Reptilian Soul Recycler
Reptile/rep (to creep; crawl) + soul/sole (one and only) + recycle (circular response)...nature moving through each being implies the soul; beings ignoring natural for artificial implies the recycling, and while recycling the adaptation of being to nature becomes a crawl aka dragging across.
Some type of computer simulation
Nature divides each being from one another...few are typecasting many into a collective (some/sum) to make them SIM-ular to one another, which represents com (together) putare (to reckon).
Computation represents the enumeration together of each natural being into an artificial sum aka hive-mind; collected consciousness; gestalt intelligence; group ego; egregore; consensus.
running for purposes
That implies suggested progressivism by few tempting many to ignore origin for outcome aka an inversion of a beings perspective.
beyond our comprehension
Com (together) prehendere (to take hold of) is what tempts a being yonder aka a distance away from discerning self.
I'm really curious
Real implies a beings response (re) to all (al) natural...curiosity tempts a being to aim at artificial outcomes.
ghetto of Frankfurt
- Ghetto; from yiddish get - "deed of separation"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/ghetto
- Frank/franc - "free; not servile"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/frank
Nature separates being...a jew tempts gentiles together with a deed (transaction). This deed represents a gentiles consent to a jewish suggestion, which shapes a consensus among gentiles into a stronghold (furt;fort) for each jewish free (frank) will of choice.
As for Frankfurt in the Bundesrepublik Deutschland...
- BUNDES (to bind; bondage, from jewish bundism, based on yiddish Völkerbund)
- REPUBLIK (gentile commonwealth under jewish sovereignty)
- DEUTSCHLAND aka land of the deutsch/dutch/dish as in yiddish.
The BRD represents the stronghold (fort) for each free (frank) jew. Also check out France aka Frankreich...
Only within can there be a break (division of whole into partial)...few suggest outbreaks to confine many within mind by inoculating fear of an outbreak.
a) Nature implies 100%; the division of nature into each being implies 50%; being within nature implies 1%
b) Few suggest percent aka per (by) centum (hundred) to distract each one among many from discerning self as one proportion of being within whole singularity of nature.
It's many together which tempts each to ignore proportion for the exchange of percentages drawn among each other.