what they hoped to achieve specifically is almost totally unknown to me.
a) Achieve from Vulgar Latin accapare, from Late Latin ad caput - "to come to a head"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/achieve
Tempting many to specify suggested information within their heads permits few to shape hope and fear within the mental archive.
b) If you write "unknown to me"; then "me" implies your hope to hold self in possession or the fear to lose self...knowledge cannot be possessed. Knowledge implies a process (cause) moving through potential (effect).
c) Using suggestion to tempt perception into ignorance represents witchcraft aka another "crafting which" one chooses.
They love signalling their superiority
It's consenting to any suggested signal/signum (identifying mark) which makes oneself inferior to another.
it goes way beyond
Nature implies the only way for each being within...few suggest "yonder" (at a distance) to distract many from being within way.
things like governments/corporations
The same nature differentiates each thing within...it's consenting to hold onto suggested government (control of ming) + corporation (corpos oration) which establishes a like-minded consensus.
It's not the governments or corporations which are working together...its the consensus among many who invest their minds into artificial constructs, which are holding together what nature works apart.
nationalist
Nat-ion-al (native within action of all) implies the status quo of being within nature. An -ist (nationalist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ism (nationalism) by another into a consensus of many under few.
governments spending so out of control
Govern (to control) ments (minds) implies each invested being within, which tricks each being to spend (to pay out or away, deprive oneself of).
to cause hyperinflation
TO (towards) implies the cause of in (within) flat (to swell) ion (action) aka of each swell (life) within action (inception towards death).
Few suggest artificial excess (hyper) to invert natural adequacy within the minds of many, hence tempting each with the ideology that nature isn't enough.
being forced on the masses
Nature implies force dividing being...few tempt the consent of each divided being into a mass-consensus, which nature continues to force apart.
Joining a mass implies self sacrifice (consent) and mutual destruction (consensus). Whenever a mass gets destroyed... only a (((fraction))) remains. Let's call that fractional reserve banking.
governments creating
Ones mind consenting to suggested creationism is what establishes mind (ment) control (govern).
two tier justice
There can be only one (cause) for each one (effect) within...it's ones consent to another ones suggestion, which establishes two tier justice (affect).
goes out of its way
Being implies the transference of essence (life) in (inception) and out (death) of way of motion. Few utilize suggestion to tempt the mind of many to wander off the one and only way of life.
Whites have no right
White implies "pure light"; right/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies light > spectrum > ray...that's the right/rite of passage for each ray within the visible spectrum of all light.
corporations only hiring browns and blacks...
...while destroying the corporations from within. Jeff Bezos: "I predict one day Amazon will fail".
surveillance systems
System aka sy (together) stem (to stand)...standing together within a consensus permits anyone apart to watch (veil) over (sur) one.
those are your choices
There can be only one aka each ones free will of choice. Another suggests pluralism (choices) to trick singular (choice) to ignore self (ones choice) for another (chosen one). That's an inversion.
Primary (balance) > secondary (choice) > optional (choices)...
You are not allowed to
Only free will of choice can deny natural allowance for artificial permission.
opened its borders
Nature implies the closed process (inception towards death) opening up the potential (life) of each being within. Border/furðra - "further, greater, superior" implies the potential of each being to further self.
Few suggest borders to enclose the mind of many to the potential of furthering self.
pushed the same ideology
Few shape ideas (ideo) and logic (logy) within the pushing/pulling nature, to tempt many to pull ideas and logic into self. Doing so tricks each different being within the same nature to become like-minded.
Only nature pushes (inception) and pulls (death) being (life)...holding onto ideology tricks ones mind to ignore that.
Move on.
That's what sameness implies...onward motion. Being implies temporary resistance within the ongoing temptation of onward motion.
heart beat
What if beat implies BE(ing)AT aka "home is where the heart is"?
data centers
Data/do - "to give"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/data
What if data center implies being given the center (perception) of all (perceivable)? What if outsourcing to artificial data centers implies central banking aka banking the center outside the source?
What if source can only move through (inception towards death) center (life)?
being built to secure
Using to (towards) to secu (to divide)...that's how nature builds being.
incoming prison
Prison/pris - "to take"...coming (inception towards death) in (life) implies process giving potential to take.
everything is connected
Every divides each from one another...ignoring this by connecting with one another occults perception.
all of that stuff is intermingled
All separates each one from one another...few intermingle many together to stuff each into confinement.
every facet of reality is a lie
If real implies each ones response (re) to all (al); then each one represents the face of all reality....not what others are masquerading it as, which requires one to believe it to be true.
the media as enemy
En-e-my implies "within me"...ones perception implies the media/medius (middle) of all perceivable within me.
the media is a filter in which you see reality
Aka the SUGGESTED media is a filter in which you see PERCEIVABLE reality...if consented to.
AT LEAST in German (zumindest) implies closing (zu) mental (mind) estimation (est)... lass dir dass mal durch den Kopf gehen.
System is weaponized against critics
- Sys (together) stem (to stand)
- Critic/krei (to distinguish)
- Weapon (instrument of offense and defense)
Using ones weapon of choice to stand together with another...prevents one from distinguishing. Few suggest systems to weaponize the consenting choice of many against critic aka self discernment as distinguished from one another.
the cost of
Co (together) sta (to stand)...nature delivers each being apart from one another. The cost of standing together implies selling self out to another.
getting the public to pay
Public implies standing (st) together (co)...that's the hidden cost ones privacy pays when joining others.
Guess who doesn't have to pay any co (together) st (to stand)? Each chosen one!
what do you call this way of thinking of yours?
Call implies "to apply by way of designation"...the issue is apply (join; combine; attach; adhere). Applying tempts one to deny way (inception towards death) of design (life).
Whatever one applies...the way of design removes, because de-sign implies the division of sign.
Attaching any name to motion tempts you to ignore the movable (motion) for the immovable (name). Motion doesn't require the name "motion"; it implies mot (mote) ion (action) aka yourself as the mote (life) within action (inception towards death).
Any de-SCRIP-tion suggested to you tempts you to consent to a SCRIPT, which others then run within you. This represents the animation of an anthropomorphic being aka a golem/goyim.
philosophy
Analyze it...phi (to love) lo (logic) sophy (to know; to perceive). Philo contradicts sophy, because phi (to love) and miso (to hate) are in conflict with one another. Your mind considering one or the other implies logic, and you choosing to hold onto one side while fighting the other implies reason.
Both logic and reason tempt you to ignore perception for suggestion aka reality for fiction aka that which moves for that which you hold onto.
i still cant wrap my mind around it
I vs you + still vs moving + can vs can't + my vs your...that's what ones mind wraps as logic within and as reason around oneself.
Wrap; verb - "to roll or fold together; envelop, surround; cover and fasten securely, swaddle; fold up or back on itself"...that's what others tempt you to do to yourself.
it seems any thought would lead to logic or reason
Nature leads each beings life from inception towards death...logic and reason implies holding onto a misleading side, while being lead. The holding onto aka the consent; belief; faith; authorization; permission; sanction; license etc. required for logic and reason are draining ones potential to hold onto.
Only if potential (life) resists process (inception towards death) can potential grow. Taking a possession by choosing a side for logic and reason implies loss of potential.
what makes us human
HU (hue; color) implies light (motion) > spectrum (momentum) > ray (matter). Light generates a spectrum which differentiates each ray from one another, which each ray (race) perceives as the visible spectrum of light.
That implies a linear process...not a circular logic turning into reason. Same with MAN (motion) > woman (momentum) > offspring (matter).
The issue in your sentence...US aka "united states" aka artificially rolling together what nature delineates apart.
reality matrix
Motion (al) > momentum (matrix) > matter (re)...momentum implies the matrix for the response of each matter within all motion.
Will a "God particle" have any basis in fact?
Each thing (effect) within all of God (cause) implies a particle given will aka essence within basis. Fact implies a fictitious act by a reacting particle within enacting God.
Will the "God particle" only exist due to the very act of observation itself?
Existence of particle (effect) implies due God (cause). The word observation implies a contradiction in terms aka observ (reaction) ation (action).
Reality, noun: "Something from which all other things derive".
Reality implies each thing responding (re) to all (al)...not a sum of things (something). Derive thereof implies driving apart.
Matrix, noun: "Something that constitutes the point from which something else originates, takes form, or develops"
The matrix/matris - "mother" isn't a constituting sum, but the womb forwarding each divided particle (off-spring). Coming into being doesn't constitute a point, but a sentience aka living essence send from inception towards point of death.
The true nature of the "phenomena", the great "mystery"
Nature (cause) was before native (effect) comes into being...holding onto true or false measurements tempts one to ignore the natural phenomenon, while clouding ones dormant mind in mystery.
Are the things around you really "real"?
Re (to respond) al (all) implies a delineation of action > reaction...neither a circle (around) nor a plural (things), which represent "fake" measurements.
Nothing can exist "outside" of "The All"
Outside implies outer cause and the side/sight within of each effect. Nothing/nihilo implies suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable aka effect denying cause for affect to one another. Doing so confines ones mind inside oneself aka circular thinking (logic), which turns into outward conflict (reason) against one another.
free-will-of-choice is Adrian P Cooper
I would feel robbed of choice if I had his lack of chin...
so logic and reason are tools less useful than perception?
Logic implies circular thinking (true OR false) which turns into a conflict of reason (true VS false) the moment one chooses to hold onto either side. The origin of logic implies logos (word of god)...yet not spoken by God but articulated in the name of God by whoever chooses to suggest it to you.
Any suggested word represents logos; you thinking about it represents logic; you fighting others about it represents reason.
Perception implies delineation aka all perceivable moving through each ones perception...no conflict; no circle; no word to hold onto.
Only within a line (implication) can a circle (reason) be shaped.
im pretty logical myself
Hence mentally stuck within the following conflicts of reason...i am vs you are + pretty vs ugly + mine vs yours.
i think i learned it works
How could your logic (pretty or ugly) ever resolve the resulting conflict of reason (pretty vs ugly)?
predict the future, as in if an apple is falling, it will hit the ground.
Pre (before) dict (to show). Before implies "forwarded being" aka nature moving each living being from inception towards death. While alive...a being cannot perceive its inception or death.
Being implies in-between beginning and end, hence transferred from > to.
One can only perceive the apple on the tree; the apple falling or the apple hitting the ground...aka each instance apart (analysis); not together (synthesis).
If you synthesize your prediction about the falling apple hitting the ground; then you mentally hold onto an artificial synthesis, which permits another to exploit your ignorance by using analysis like picking the apple from above or catching the apple before it hits the ground. Exploiting ignorance represents a potential of free will of choice...a potential you ignore when binding your choice to a prediction.
Life does not need to predict death...life needs to adapt to the process of dying. Predicting outcome implies gambling aka ignoring given choice by taking a chance.
UFOs will dislocate society
What if the only unidentified flying (inception towards death) object (life) is located within a social identity? What if this artificial social identity can be destroyed to dis-locate natural objects from one another?
question their religions
Re (to respond) ligo (to bind)...what if ones response to suggested socialism binds one into a society, while ignoring that FREE will of choice implies a dislocation from one another?
Spielberg
Heather O'Rourke (1975–1988)...
a) HOW implies an adverb aka something added to a verb. Verb expresses action aka motion, which one ignores when adding to it. Why the ignorance? Because adding to motion burdens matter aka oneself.
Motion (inception towards death) offers everything to matter (life)...trying to add to motion implies matter taking from one another into (ideals) and onto (idols) self, hence the burden.
Try ask nature how. Nature doesn't answer by ad-verb...oneself represents the addition (ad) to natures motion (verb).
To prevent one from discerning this for self...others manipulate the words used to describe it like in this case VERB; noun - "word"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/verb
How could a verb ever express motion if one holds onto words as definitions? Notice also that in this etymological dictionary...VERB (word) is defined as NOUN (name). That's a mindfuck right there.
how does one learn
Learn; verb - "to follow or find the track"...asking "how" implies following the track; discerning self within foundation implies finding the track.
Learning implies teaching self and vice verse.
how to perceive natures motion
One can only perceive what nature moves...it's holding onto what another suggests which manipulates ones perception.
For example...holding onto truth tempts one to ignore motion. Applying motion to truth changes it into a lie. That's why liars require one to believe it to be true.
tl;dr: Try to use implication (if/then) instead of reason (side vs side)...the former continues to move forwards; the latter tempts you to hold onto a side, while moving in circles.
If you ask "how to perceive natures motion"; then you confine the answer to either this or that (logic); which then turns into this vs that (reason) as soon as you choose a side by agreeing or disagreeing.
Now try implication...if nature moves; then "to perceive" implies nature moving perceivable towards a beings perception.
the union of Israeli and US military
It's hard to turn a trick if the whore is carrying her pimp around...
still too abstract
a) Still implies "motionless"...I described motion; you chose to view it as motionless. You are doing this willingly to yourself and so only your will can let go of the motionless view of motion.
b) Ab (away from) stract (to draw). Instead of drawing away from motion as I did when describing how motion works...you only view my description as drawn upon a motion you ignore.
For you the words "inception towards death" represent a script aka a written document (dock-your-mind). I try to describe the process which moves through the potential of life. It's this process which you need to abstract from (perceivable inspiration)...not my description thereof (suggested information).
for me to understand
- FOR implies forwards aka a process moving potential forwards.
- ME implies potential holding itself in possession, while ignoring process.
- TO implies towards aka a process moving potential (life) from beginning (inception) towards end (death).
- UNDERSTAND implies potential choosing to stand-under another potential when consenting to a suggestion.
FOR + TO implies natural; ME + UNDERSTAND implies artificial...only if you choose to let go of self and the want to stand-under another will you discern being "forwarded towards".
it has a valid meaning
It doesn't. You choose to draw validity from meaning suggested to you. Meaning/mean/men (to think) implies either by natural impulse (perception) or artificial impulse (suggestion)...depending on your free will of choice.
Natural validity implies the force of nature moving through each being; artificial validity implies legal bondage to another being.
The bankers issuing currency become the source of validation for any price you buy and sell for...if you consent to the suggested currency.
You don't need validation from anyone...nature implies validation of being; being implies adaption to being validated by nature.
how do i use it
It (nature) uses you (being)...you adapt to being used by it OR be abused by others depending on your free will of choice.
in practice
Practice; verb - "to follow or employ a course of action"...if employee (life) follows course of action (inception towards death); then employee dies faster.
The opposite of practice implies alteration...that's what free will of choice does unless willingly ignored.
to escape
If TO implies "towards"; then life being moved from inception TOWARDS death doesn't allow escape from outcome. Inception sentences life towards point of death. Living implies a death sentence giving life sentience.
Few suggest escapism to confine the minds of consenting many within ignorance aka denial of being moved. Life after death tricks the mind to ignore living within process of dying. The issue...the living mind has to hold onto the trick, while the process of dying exponentially draws away the living power to hold onto unless life resists.
the artificial trap
Ignoring to be free traps one artificially. Whatever you hold onto mentally (ideal) or physically (idol) by free will of choice traps you artificially. Natures motion gives you free will of choice, while taking away any artificial traps you hold onto. The issue...how long will you choose to hold onto the artifice while ignoring natures motion?
what exactly is this natural path of inception life death?
a) The ACT (inception towards death) which EX-tracts reaction (life).
Misusing the word "exact" as a measure for accuracy or preciseness tempts ones mind to ignore the implied motion of ex (out) agere (to set in motion; drive forward)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/exact Without ignorance ones mind can discern self as coming out of motion.
b) A path implies "a narrow passageway or route across"...all of nature (cause) narrows itself down to each native (effect) being moved across aka a transference (life) from beginning (inception) towards end (death).
What's artificial is mentally (ideal) or physically (idol) choosing to hold onto anything while ignoring motion. For example...nature moves sound; which one ignores when holding onto artificial words to describe anything within sound.
The articulation of words within natural sound represents spell-craft, and while natural sound transfers through each being; articulation tempts the sharing and carrying across of words held within memory...representing the self inflicted burden of sin/syn (together with, jointly; alike).
c) Motion (inception towards death) WAS perceivable before matter (life) can suggest what it IS...consenting to the latter tempts one to ignore the former.
Maybe all the religions are ass
a) All sets one free. Religion binds one to one another while ignoring all.
b) All moves through one. Holding onto religion establishes constipation within one.
c) Maybe implies may/magh (to be able) be (being; essence). All enables each one; few suggest "maybe" as an auxiliary of prediction to tempt many to ignore all.
Humanity has surrendered itself to essentially to what amounts to
Essential implies "essence within all" aka each ones state of being. Amounting implies essence (potential) shaped into a substance (possession)...self surrender.
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Frank-harris-hold-on-to-the-vision-lyrics + https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcThFswcLB0
they are free
They (plural) are free (singular)...are you sure about that?
Seven Laws
There can be only one L(and) A(ir) W(ater)...S(plit)EVEN.
noah
An ark/arc puts those S(plit)EVEN into noah/noach (rest) aka the intermission of labor.
10 Commandments
1 (natural singularity) 0 (artificial denial)...one denies natural for artificial when com (together) mand (mandate) ment (mind).
Mandate refers to manually giving consent to any suggestion of another.
Intolerance writ large
a) Intolerance implies "unwillingness"...being implies given will. It's denial of ones choice for a chosen ones suggestion which establishes intolerance.
b) No matter how large or small one writes...the line within which one writes can never be fulfilled.
mosaic
Aka putting partials together to make whole...a game of puzzle.
origins are in place
Only within origin can there be placement.
the Babylonian experience
Aka the confusion of tongues from singularity (sound > instrument) into plurality (sound > word > instrument) establishing BA'BEL, noun - "confusion; disorder".
the jews adopted...a religion
If a gentile ADOPTS religion; then each jew ADAPTS without competition aka if ones choice re (to respond) ligo (to bind) then each chosen one remains free to choose.
with Yahweh as sole
a) WITH contradicts sole.
b) Yahweh implies a suggestible word among each divided being within the singularity of natural sound. It's consenting to the suggested word which represents pluralism.
c) Yahweh/havah - "was" aka singularity (cause) was before each single unit (effect) comes into being. Suggesting what Yahweh IS by shaping a label/libel tempts ones perception to deny what WAS perceivable.
erroneously accepted
Acceptance or denial of natural delineation (inception towards death) erodes being (life).
property rights
Right/reg (to move in a straight way) implies proper (forwards). Nature implies the property right each being needs to resist...a jew tempts gentiles to want property rights to hold onto.
Holding onto reduces resistance, hence moving anything held onto out of ones hold quicker, which in return permits each jew to freely use whatever gentiles are lacking in resistance to hold onto.
remove God from TV
Remove implies ones response to being moved by God. Responding to a vision told (tv) by another removes oneself from God.
I saw the light
Not while watching Television.
I was a fool to wander and a-stray...straight is the gate and narrow the way
Straight is the gate (inception towards death) and narrow (life) the way.
- Growing...inception > life
- Shrinking...life > death
A jew blows up an artificial circle (inflation vs deflation) to distract gentiles from natural delineation (inception > life > death)
The internet was once a fun place with many websites to visit daily and get new, fresh perspectives.
That's a gentiles mind on jewish inflation.
Help me find good content on the shrinking internet
That's a gentiles mind on jewish deflation.
I follow
If a gentile follows natural delineation (inception > life > death); then bye bye gentile.
If a gentile follows artificial circles (inflation vs deflation); then after the burst...the next bubble gets blown up.
the Star of David...it never existed
https://img.gvid.tv/i/3xeLvRgE.jpg
scriptures
Scripe; noun - "professional interpreter of the jewish law"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/scribe
seal
Does nature engrave a seal (identifying mark) upon the living transfer from inception towards death?
summon demon
Summoning (to put together) contradicts de (to divide) mon (to provide)...
I want to meet u/free-will-of-choice in real life!
Free will of choice implies want within need...any attempt to meet with another binds ones free will of choice.
genius
Genius; noun - "guardian deity or spirit which watches over each person from birth" from gene - "give birth, beget"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/genius
Only nature begets being. Viewing one another as GENIUS lets the GENIE out of the bottle aka ones essence (life) leaking the liquid nature (inception towards death) which carries one. Applying the label "genius" to another establishes friction like rubbing a lamp (vessel containing flammable liquid)...
- What's a vessel? Essence within all.
- What's flammable liquid? Liquid (inception towards death) enabling flame (life) aka the spark of life.
autistic
Autistic aka autism aka auto (self) ism (consensus)...joining a consensus contradicts self.
The jew who coined autism (eugen bleuler) conspired with the jewish father of psychoanalysis (sigismund schlomo freud) to conquer psychiatry... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3gc1x1nk.jpg
The trick...a gentile cannot be autistic without consenting to the jewish suggestion of autism, at which point self (auto) is being ignored for consensus (ism) which permits a jew to conquer the mind of gentiles.
fucker
The House of Fugger was originally called "Fucker"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugger_family
Fuck/fugg from German Fuge, noun - "masonic joint" implies to knead; fashion; fit (ma) sound (sonic) by connecting (joint). Which represents the foundation for "banking trust"...where sound money is being fashioned into fiat currency by tempting trustees to join.
whose goal here is to raise
Only in-between coming in (inception) and going out (death) can one rise (life)...few suggest goals to tempt many to ignore the process.
linguistic awareness
A lingu-ist implies someone who consented to suggested lingu-ism...doing so binds ones tongue (lingu). Language prevents the free use of ones tongue by tricking one to articulate words within natural sound; thereby establishing a forked tongue. Those speaking in forked tongues become unaware of sound.
although misguidedly
Any guidance from another tempts one to miss being (life) moved (inception towards death). Why would a being require guidance during natural delineation? Once again...falling for guidance forks ones road of travel thereby establishing crossroads... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossroads_(folklore)
Or is a blue hair tranny activist with a shtick.
a) The last time I had colored hair was in the 80s.
b) Life being moved from inception towards death implies a TRANS-fer of essence
c) Only nature implies active, which activates each reactive being within, hence giving free will of choice. A jew suggests a consensus (activism) to trick the consent (activist) of each reacting gentile into bondage.
d) If you got a SHTICK; then you're free will of choice is STUCK. It's consenting to any suggestion which gets one stuck within an artificial consensus with others. A yid wields a shtick of authority aka god/gad - "stick to drive oxen"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/gad which the yid got by consensus of gentiles.
start an edomoligy sub
Start (inception) > finish (death) inspires resistance (life) which submission to logic contradicts.
which could be enjoyable and informative
a) A being has to resist the temptation of joy and misery as free will of choice from in-between.
b) Holding onto suggested information tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration. The issue...spirit moves through form, so holding onto form ignores spirit.
Being implies formed (matter) within the spirit (momentum) of action (motion)...holding onto information from another prevents one from discerning this for self by adapting to inspiration.
if you are an alive man or woman
Being implies the living transfer (matter) of male (motion) through female (momentum)...
The only enjoyment you can be garnering ftom posting here...is so fickle and small
a) About free-will-of-choice - Post Score (0) - Comment Score (15788)
Only nature posts (puts forwards); which is what I adapt to by taking apart com (together) ment (mind) aka collective consciousness aka hive-mind aka egregore.
b) By resisting joy (want) and misery (not want) ones mind opens up to need aka all of flowing nature for each one formed within.
What do you do for a living?
Only nature does which allows each being within to re-do. One cannot do "for a living" without ignoring nature forwarding each living being.
Are you married?
Not in wedlock. We did the ceremony privately for family and friends, but stayed fruitful ever since without public license.
Are you religious?
Re (to respond) ligo (to bind)...doing that binds free will of choice. On the flip-side...resisting bondage allows one to freely analyze any religious topics.
agnostic
Nostic/noēsis - "to know" implies ones perception within all perceivable. It's ones consent to any suggestion of another which makes one not (ag) knowing (nostic).
What do you enjoy other than dissecting language?
Watching connections (synthesis) fall apart while dissecting (analysis)...farmsteading would make me miserable if I couldn't dissect why everything keeps breaking down.
a) College aka col (together) legare (to choose)...there's no such thing as choosing together without ignoring ones free will of choice.
b) Re (to respond) com (together) ment (mind) implies a consensus among many shaped by suggestions of few.
even though it's "free".
Even (balance) sets odd (choice) free...any free college recommendations imbalances choice if consented to.
The mount of olives implies each annointed one rising up (mount) out of all (oil).
Aka the fault-line (inception towards death) for each anointed one (life) rising up within.