that words are reality
a) Perceivable sound implies reality; suggested words implies fiction...if one ignores former for latter.
b) Nature doesn't shape words; it moves sound. Those within shape words to describe perceivable through suggestions, hence establishing themselves as the media/medium/medius/middle in-between reality (perceivable inspiration) and fiction (suggested information).
c) Suggested words like "insane person" are utilized by few to keep many ignorant of perceivable...in sanus (within sound) + per sonos (by sound)...consenting to former conceals self within latter, while keeping one profane.
d) Words are shaped through LETTERS...a name used to distract from ones consent LETTING the suggestions by others shape fiction (words) within reality (sound).
Suggestion itself implies FI'AT. (Latin fio) - "let it be done; a decree; a command to do something"...hence tempting one to LET others do something, when consenting by free will of choice to suggested information.
broken thought processes
All perceivable processes each ones perception by internal separation of whole into partials aka a breaking down of thoughts within procession.
Whatever information others are suggesting tempts one to hold onto it within ones consenting mind/memory...meanwhile; perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto, since it implies moving partials (matter) within a whole (motion).
One can only discern self by the differences within ones surrounding, hence the same whole differentiating itself into partials to establish each ones free will of choice to discern self among one another.
tl; dr...I break apart what few tempt many to hold together, while ignoring that natural order (inception towards death) sets apart (life) whatever those within hold onto.
From a different perspective...mind/memory needs to be used like a ram, yet wants to be misused like a hard-drive. The former lets perceivable inspiration through; while the latter fills itself with suggested information until capacity. It's each ones free will of choice to balance in-between need (letting go) and want (holding onto).
One cannot save nature within self while being within nature...others tempt one to try anyway. Memory needs to adapt to movement of nature; while resisting the temptation to affix thoughts; definitions; beliefs; creeds; suggested information; words; names; numbers; idols; brands etc.
you are
The origin of "you" implies one claiming self as "me; myself or I"; which in return brands everyone else into a "you". If one lets go of that claim; then the brands assigned to other ones dissolve as well.
In reality...whole (oneness) generates partials (ones), hence all being one in EN'ERGY, noun (Greek work) - "internal or inherent power".
Sleight of hand: "all for one; and one for all" or "there can be only one" or "alone aka all(in)one"
Paul begins appearing in the dreams of random people, many of whom do not know him. In the dreams, calamity occurs or the dreamers ask for help, but Paul is passive or emotionless and does not intervene.
a) Those who don't know (perceive) experience calamity (reason) within dreams (suggested).
b) To be implies passive (life) within active (inception towards death), hence a passage. Others suggest passivism to tempt one to ignore re-acting.
c) Emotion (Latin emoveo) - "to move from" tempts one to ignore being resistance (temporary growth) within velocity (ongoing loss), hence emotions tempting one to ignore ones position.
In short...one needs to resist wanted temptation aka choosing motion (needed) or emotion (wanted).
d) Consenting to suggested tempts one to ask for more suggestions, hence the dreamers seeking answers from those awake.
e) Questions (suggested progressivism aka quest towards outcome) tempt others to suggest answers, while in return ignoring perceivable solution offered.
That's why answering questions by dreamers is tempting those awake into the dream-state of ignoring perceivable for suggested.
f) Ignorance of dreamer breeds insolence within those awake. Why? Because a wake requires resisting the temptation of falling asleep, while ignorance lures one into it...unbeknownst to those ignoring.
This is where those awake find themselves tempted to scream "wake the fuck up" to those willingly asleep.
g) Trying to wake up those willingly asleep will be viewed by those who WANT to sleep as NOT WANTing to wake up, hence a conflict of reason (want vs not want) with those awake at the opposite side aka something that needs to be attacked to defend ones status quo...which is ignorance and which will not be admitted without fighting self.
h) Paul falling for the dream (wishes the dream was reality) implies Saul aka inversion of apostle (to send away) by bringing those awake and those asleep together.
Paul starts apart from, yet within, others, then gets pushed outside by others, while wanting to be inside with others.
In reality...PAUL (apostle; to send away) and SAUL (sole/soul; one and only) implies each one (life) send away (inception towards death), hence apart from one another, not together. That's why a dreamer can only awake self.
I want to know
Wanting suggested contradicts/inverts/ignores/denies perceivable need...KNOW; verb (to perceive).
consider
a) CON (together; with) contradicts SIDE (apart from)...
b) Implication (if/then) keeps sides apart from one another. Reason (want vs not want; true vs false; yes vs no; belief vs disbelief etc.) tempts sides together within a conflict of reason.
a) Last movie I watched was "28 Days Later"...at release; 22 years ago; second half sucked.
b) Roots of fire...paewr (inanimate) + egni/ignis (animate) aka being (life) within animation (inception towards death).
a) https://archive.org/details/BillCooperComplete
b) COOP, verb - "bending, hollowness, or containing, holding"...doing that contradicts ones free WILL of choice.
c) Others tempt ones free WILL of choice to COOP to suggested BILLS...consenting to a bill of exchange permits those suggesting to withdraw payments, hence tempting minds to pay interest on exchanges.
I watched...
Few farmers show; many cattle watch, while being herded.
herd mentality
Mind wants to hold onto (suggested information); but needs to let go of (perceivable inspiration)...few tempt many to mentally hold onto suggested information, which when consented to, permits few to herd/hurt many collectively.
nicholas cage
Aka NIKE (victory; from weik; to conquer) LAOS (people) + CAVEA (enclosure for animals; imprisonment)
spy
If many consent to follow the suggestions by few, then few don't need to watch the conduct of many, only of those not following along.
warrant
a) Consent by many warrants/authorizes suggesting few to take charge.
b) Root of warrant/werento/wer - "to cover" implies covering perceivable by ignorance, when consenting to suggested.
a) Aka jew (nypost) utilizing suggested narrative (transgender) to tempt consenting gentiles into a conflict of reason (good vs bad) against each other.
b) Only within GENeration (inception towards death) can there be TRANSmutation (life).
c) Consenting to follow a suggested narrative permits those suggesting to ESCORT TRANSmutation within GENeration, which in return SQUADS (to press down) ones growth potential.
d) SQUATTER, noun - "In the United States, one that settles on new land without a title"...notice NEW York City.
TI'TLE, noun (Latin titulus) - "an inscription (suggestion) put over any thing (perceivable) as a name by which it is known"
Edit:
- How to push suggestion? "Start spreading the news"
- What happens if one ignores perception? "You're leaving today"
- Consenting to suggested implies? "I want to be a part of it"
"It's up to you, New York, New York"... https://www.lyrics.com/lyric/34356203/Frank+Sinatra/New+York%2C+New+York
Redemption through Sin
a) Redemption aka to purchase back from (redeem) + action (tion) tempts one to ignore that action (inception towards death) offers reactions (life) for free (will of choice).
It's the happy merchant who offers suggested "redemption" for the price of ones consent. Buying into that; sells self out.
b) Atone (at one; together) tempts one to ignore being set apart from one another.
Others suggest SIN, verb - "to depart voluntarily from the path" to tempt consenting ones together in their attempt to redeem themselves by atonement.
c) Suggested ATONE (at one; together) implies the inversion of ALONE (all in one; separation).
d) SIN/SINS/SINCE - "after" implies suggested progressivism (towards outcome), which tempts one to ignore perceivable origin moving forwards being aka BE-FORE.
Origins of Subversion
a) Origin implies direction (straight by action); being implies reaction curving (life) within straight (inception towards death) of action.
b) Subvert implies under/below (sub) + to turn opposite direction (verto; versus).
Consenting to follow suggested turns one within perceivable and against others.
c) If one ignores origin (perception) then one permits others to subvert outcomes (suggestion)
they claimed that there were "always"
a) If ALL is WAY, then all changes/moves...
b) Notice how effortless a jew can change everything; while gentiles are struggling to prevent anything from being changed.
Why is that? Because a jew comprehends that everything perceivable changes; and that a gentile can be tempted to hold onto (to claim) suggested, while ignoring perceivable.
c) Suggested "Warhammer is..." tempts one to ignore perceivable "motion/change was before Warhammer was shaped within". If motion exists before matter; then matter changes within motion.
Matter (life) cannot ESCAPE motion (inception towards death)...but it can seek escapism by ignoring motion/change.
power of technology
Ones consent to reason (logy) over suggested artifice (tech) becomes the power those suggesting wield.
science
Latin scio - "to know" implies perceivable as oneself...not suggested by another.
common humanity
Hue of man implies a spectrum of visible light aka a separation/a setting apart...others suggest common-ism (communism) to tempt consenting ones together.
promise of progress
Promise aka pro mitto implies sending forwards; while progress aka pro gradior implies descent (life) while being send forwards (inception towards death).
Ones consent to a suggested promise implies ones willing ignorance to descent self aka one cannot grow self by submitting under another.
no peace amongst
a) Amongst implies a setting apart of PIECES.
b) Wholesome generates PIECE; profane are concealed underneath PEACE...while fighting endless wars of reason against each other.
I read...because of escapism; not because I want to engage
a) ENGA'GE, verb - "to make liable for a debt to a creditor; to bind one's self as surety"
b) Ones consent (read) to the suggestion (book) of another implies engaging.
c) Because aka "being cause" implies the suggested inversion of perceivable...cause (inception towards death) towards being (life).
d) Suggested escape-ism tempts one to ignore that ones consent to any suggested -ism BINDS one to another.
Consent escapes response-ability (free will of choice), hence shirking ones choice by selecting chosen ones.
warhammer
a) To shape by beating (hammer) + reason (war).
b) BEAT (to abate) - "to lessen; to diminish; to moderate; to mitigate"...reasoning against another abates oneself.
the club at the top is something similar
a) Each one "at the top" differentiates self within a club as a VIP, hence within a different section from those similar.
b) Sleight of hand: "Don't try to act like you don't know where we be neither"..."We in the club all the time"..."G-Unit"
G-UNIT aka GENERATIVE ONE aka ONE (life) within GENERATION (inception towards death)
c) CLUB, verb - "to join, as a number of individuals, to the same end; to contribute separate powers to one end, purpose or effect"
Hence.."you can find me (jew) in the club (gentiles)"..."I'm into havin' sex (being set apart)..."I ain't into makin' love (coming together)".
abundance of members...
Implies aggregation of many under few aka abandoning of self for seeking abundance among others.
not convinced
CONVINCE, verb - "to persuade or satisfy the mind by evidence"...few convinced many that "not; nothing; nothingness" exists...despite lack of evidence thereof.
useful club
If club is used fully; then why take on more members?
What Freemason is a threat?
This one...FREE (ones choice) MASON (another ones suggestion) aka using information as bricks and consent as mortar to build walls of ignorance within others...a deadly threat to all life.
Freemasons have been defeated.
a) Reason (win vs loss) conceals implication (if/then). Reasoning implies yielding of self while fighting others...a self defeat.
b) DE (division) FEAT (to form)...consenting to suggested forms division (reason).
Revolution is the only solution.
Solution (inception towards death) directs matter (life)...others suggest one to respond (re) by turning (volu) against one another, when ignoring direction.
Few suggest progressivism to tempt many towards outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin, hence turning their responses from one side to the other aka inverting the status quo of being resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death).
Ask yourself if you are being tricked to view solution as an outcome instead of origin...use implication (if/then) instead of reason (versus) to be able to answer yourself.
The nature of sharing information is to inspire response
a) Nature shares inspiration...not information. Being alive implies as partial (share) within (in) breath (spirit) of action (tion). Breathing implies respiration within animation.
b) INSPIRation INSPIRes...information forms conflicts within. These conflicts are called "reason".
c) Responding to information tempts one to hold onto; responding to inspiration inspires one to resist temptations by letting go.
immolation
Latin immolare "to bring as an offer" and -tion (action) implies action (inception towards death) bringing reactions (life) as an offer to those reacting.
Ones consent to suggested information by another implies ignoring that aforementioned offer...this implies suicide aka self-sabotaging mania aka self sacrifice.
department
Implies division (de) of partial (part) mind (ment)...into conflicts of reason, when consenting to suggested information.
psychology
Implies animating power (psyche) contradicted by reasoning (logy) over suggested information, affixed within ones consenting mind.
revolutionary suicide
If one reacts (re) by turning (volu) within action (tion), then one destroys self. Why? Because action (inception towards death) inspires reactions (life) to resist temptation.
Being moved towards death implies both the inspiration for life to resist, and the temptation to ignore resisting, hence oneself being choice within balance aka need (resist) or want (ignore).
Others tempt one with suggestion (want) to ignore perception (need)...and consenting to that implies ones suicide by free will of choice. As in...if one chooses want over need; then that's ones free will of choice pulling the trigger on self.
- Information (suggested words) temps consent into war (reason)
- Inspiration (perceivable sound) generates implication (if/then) for free will of choice.
surface internet
a) Internal net implies being concealed within, not on the surface thereof.
b) Consider a fish within a net dragged to surface...what happens if a solid (life) swimming within a fluid (inception towards death) is lured into a net?
c) What if living within process of dying implies rising to a surface while drowning? What if ones face implies SUR (over, above, beyond, upon) FACE (visage)?
The search engines have forsaken you
Forsake implies "driving forwards"...searching for suggested outcomes tempts one to ignore being (life) driven forwards (inception towards death) within perceivable origin.
Using GOOGLE implies ones consent to view reality through the fictitious goggle by another.
Watching implies focusing ones sight one a stage set by another, while ignoring to be sight within (insight).
Alternative Media...
....implies one after another (alternative) at middle (media) aka one life after another at middle of inception/death.
Suggested media by few tempts consenting many to ignore alternation; hence destabilizing media. Perception implies center of perceivable...suggestion tempts ones perception off-center; while permitting those suggesting it to be at center; middle; medius; media.
paradox
PARA (contrary to) DEK (to take)...whatever solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) takes becomes contrary to motion.
Taking suggested (truth) while ignoring perceivable (change) permits others to exploit contradiction (lies) for as long as one holds onto suggested.
everyone lies
Everything changes; everyone within has the free will of choice to ignore perceivable change for holding onto suggested definitions (definite; to affix).
everyone lies, but knowing...
Lies are suggested; knowledge implies perceivable. Nature doesn't lie...it moves perceivable towards perception, which isn't "truth" but "change".
If one applies change to truth; then it changes it into lie.
From a different perspective...want (truth) vs not want (lies) tempts one to ignore need (change).
it's hard to trust
To trust implies ones consent to the suggestion by another and it's the easiest thing to tempt others into giving willingly away.
- Suggestion: "Do you want...?"
- Consent: Both "Yes I want..." + "No I don't want..." imply consent to suggested.
Let's now rebrand it to hide the obvious...
- Suggestion: "Do you want abortion?
- Consent: "Yes. Pro choice" + "No. Pro Life" both imply consent to abortion.
you can't trust your enemies and you can't trust your allies
Nature inspires ones resistance to all temptation...others tempt one to lower resistance by giving trust; consent; faith; submission...
Nature punishes trust.
the word of God is...
...suggested to you by those speaking in the name of (in nomine) patris et filii et spiritus sancti.
Nature implies perceivable sound (inspiration)...not suggested words (information). Words (fiction) can only be shaped within sound (reality) and require ones trust, which when given, permits others to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the meaning of all words at will, which implies "spell-craft".
- VOICE, noun (Latin vox; voco) - "to drive out sound"
Perceivable sound drives through one...suggested words tempt one to ignore that when holding onto them. Few utilize voice to shape fiction (word) within reality (sound) among many...it's called spell-craft.
Voice (perceivable sound) or Noise (suggested words)...its ones free will of choice.
Sleight of hand: Slade - Cum On Feel The Noize...leading into a "Quiet Riot".
Daniel
a) Tribe of Dan (Hebrew: דָּן, judge)..."judge not, that ye be not judged".
- PYTHONIC, adjective - "pretending to foretell future events"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Pythonic
As in... https://memo.co/blog/future-pr-belongs-to-storytellers/
- MONTE; noun (mountain) from Latin montem; mons; men - "to project"
Few utilize mountains of information; projected by suggestion towards the mind/memory of consenting many.
Triangle Diddy... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2ZKCZPr8.png
- WASTE, verb - "to diminish by gradual dissipation or loss; to expend without necessity"
a) Want implies waste; need implies resisting want.
b) "your wife" implies ones choice of possessing another...possession drains resistance. Why? Because holding onto something within a moving system costs strength.
c) Sustenance of self by perpetuation through another aka intercourse for off-spring implies need...anything else implies want. Having free will of choice implies being in-between balance (need/want); hence constantly being tempted (want) to ignore resisting (need).
d) Notice that the more you're "doing it"; the less you get out of it. Just like with any other temptation. Yet the more you choose to resist "doing it"; the more you'll get out of it...
Notice the "zionists" subtitle when a jew says "the jewish people"...
Weather as a Force Multiplier 'Owning the Weather in 2025'... https://ia601605.us.archive.org/35/items/WeatherAsAForceMultiplier/WeatherAsAForceMultiplier.pdf
Published in 1996 and still on track...