1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

wasted $1.6 billion

The only thing wasted is ones consent to any suggested FIAT (let it be done), because doing so wastes fiat/bheue - "to be; exist; grow"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/fiat

One wonders why many keep forgetting this...

Nature was full of falsified data

A great example for how easy falsification is...instead of falsifying any data; why not simply publish in the name of NATURE to automatically falsify any following data?

Nature cannot falsify...only a native can falsify by ignoring perceivable nature for suggested "nature". Ignorance represents the falsification of reality, because one isn't responding (re) to all (al), but to one another when invoking ignorance.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

That which is presented without evidence or logic can be dismissed

a) Evident/videre - "to see" implies ones perception within all perceivable; logic implies ones mind confining itself to any suggestion by another. Logic (suggestion) contradicts evidence (perception), hence turning ones line of sight into a circular thinking.

b) Dismiss aka dis (apart) miss (send) implies being send apart from one another, hence allowing each ones perception a clear sight. It's nature, which by dismissing each native, releases each being from restraint, hence setting FREE will of choice into being.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Furnish/fornire/fram - "forwards"...a picture (captured moment) tempts one to ignore being moved forwards, which while ignored establishes friction (war) among beings.

The N(orth) E(east) W(est) S(outh) picture a circle around one to distract a being (life) from forward delineation (inception towards death), which is also why newspapers are published into circulation as "circulars that drive your marketing initiatives forward".

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

it's beyond demopublicans and cathojews.

In-between democrat or republican + catholic or jew operates ones free will of choice. Choosing either side binds ones free will of choice while throwing one off-balance.

Be (being) yond (on the other side of) represents a contradiction in terms, since one can only be in-BE-tween sides. If one chooses democrat; republican; catholic or jew, then opposing the other side (yond) tempts a being (be) to lose sight of ones position.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

nephilim...receive their power directly

a) Direction (inception towards death) empowers the rise (life) of each fallen one (nephilim).

b) Reception aka re (to respond) cept (to take) ion (action) tempts one to take into possession what is given by procession. As a fallen one...one needs to respond to action directly. Taking anything into possession hinders the rise of each fallen one.

In other words...nature moving all perceivable through each natives perception implies the opposite of receive (take) aka being given. It's suggestion which tempts ones consent to receive, thereby giving up ones perception of all perceivable.

It's through suggestion that sound (phonetician) can be formed (cannanite) into words to rule others.

Notice Cain from Hebrew Qayin (created one) from Semitic stem q-y-n (to form, to fashion)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Cain

It's ones consent which enABLEs Cain.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

"ascent" was a social

Only private can ascend; social implies a burden shared among each private within. Stacking burdens (pyramid scheme) isn't ascension, but the manifestation of private decline.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

counter culture using norms

One cannot counter cultural norms, for it is the counter (table where a money lender does business) who cultivates norms (carpenter's square) by use of a compass.

Countering implies turning against another, hence few using a compass aka compassion (sympathy for the devil) to turn many against each other, like in your example...normal vs abnormal; most vs least; marry vs divorce; happy vs sad; healthy vs unhealthy; white vs black; hard vs easy; stop vs go.

A circle doesn't represent fertile ground to raise any child...it represents sacrificial confinement aka the christian eucharist or the jewish tabernacle. A circle represents a communion (ones coming together).

“they” try so hard to stop you

Stopping you implies ones ignorance of all motion. Ignorance isn't hard to tempt; it's easy to tempt the mind of another to harden itself by holding onto beliefs; ideals; definitions; truths; accounts; stories; illustrations; narratives; tales; norms etc.

Sleight of hand from the X-Files: "i want to believe"...it's the gentiles who want to stop the jewish deconstruction of structure, while ignoring that nature moves, which allows structure (life) only within division (inception towards death).

Nature implies the only force of deconstruction for any artificial structure within. A jew suggests STOP (cessation of motion) as an artificial structure for gentiles to hold onto. Why? To build ignorance within the mind of gentiles, which represents the building of monuments (sepulchre aka tomb; burial place; to embalm; bury).

Look at the etymological root of monument... https://www.etymonline.com/word/monument

Notice monu/men - "to think" hence the thought control, and also monu/moneie - "to remind" hence memory turning back on itself. Then also notice MONEIE aka MONEY, which brings one back to the counter of the money lenders aka the beginning of my wall of text.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

do people value

People evaluate each other as more (plurality) than all (singularity) offers each person within.

souls

Soul aka sole implies "one and only"...plurality implies ones denial of soul.

morality

Mor (variety) al (all) implies the division of each one within all from one another...not two sides turned against each other (good vs bad). Few suggest moralism to tempt many to turn against each other by choosing to hold onto either side.

It's a gotten good

What one got is GOD...viewing it as good or bad turns one side against the other, while distracting from GOD.

Just seems so empty ultimately to me

Setting an ultimatum by forming a final aim or object empties ones mind of purpose aka of what God puts forth.

Few suggest ultimatums to many under the names of...aim; goal; plan; objective; intention; idea (idol); ambition; dream; point; aspiration; target; design; project; mark; hope; fear; desire; pretension; wish; destination; scheme; plot; grail; future; name of the game etc.

Each of the above represents a simple incentivisation by few to tempt many to ignore origin (initiation) for outcome (ultimatum) representing the turning (washing) of the mind by motivating with a reward to tempt others towards punishment.

dreams for future

It's a game of carrot and stick. The carrot represents fiction; the stick represents the consequence of ignoring reality.

There's only now (present)...not before (past) or after (future). Ignoring this corrupts ones presence. Others suggest the future as a carrot, while nature punishing the ignorant dreamer represents the stick.

If one ignores natural for artificial; then one gets punished. Ones presence gets punished by holding onto the past or dreaming about the future.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Certainty is where growth goes to DIE!!!

Few utilize suggestion to tempt many to ASCERTAIN it by consent, which tempts one to hold onto, thereby suffocating life.

The walls go up to protect certainty.

Aka ignorance going up to protect consensus.

Don't let them.

THEM (pluralism) + DON'T (nihilism) are ascertained by consent while tempting one to ignore letting go.

beginner's mind

BE (to be) GIN (to generate) implies ones mind coming into being within generation which ascertainment tempts one to ignore.

Generation implies need; ascertainment implies want... wanting tempts ones mind to ignore need.

Not confidence but openess.

Only within openness (perceivable) can confidence (suggested) be shaped into nihilism (not). Confidence implies ones denial of openness.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

The circular financing, the lack of product

Gentile investment into jewish AI establishes an inward (logic) and outward (reason) circle distracting from the natural line of progress aka product/producere - "bring forth".

There's no lack of product within nature since nature cannot stop to produce...it's ones mind confined to an artificial circle which fails to re-produce.

Consumer AI is designed to fail

a) Nature implies fall/fail generating rise...AI inverts hindsight with designs of foresight aka suggested outcomes to distract from perceivable origin.

The answers ones questions seek from AI distract from the ongoing solution (inception towards death) to any problem (life) brought forwards within nature. Foresight implies looking forward; hindsight implies seeing (ones perception) what has happened (all perceivable) aka response to origin.

b) Consume aka summoned (sume) together (con) aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka artificially putting together (synthesis) what nature sets apart (analysis).

How does a gentile consume? By willingly consenting to the suggested product by a jew...in this case AI.

lack of government involvement

That which controls (govern) your mind (ment) is that which your mind (ment) turns (volve) within (in). Consenting to AI implies involvement with AI, which implies government by those producing AI.

The jewish INTELLIGENTSIA is based on gentile consent to ARTIFICE, while ignoring nature.

this entire house of cards is doomed to fail.

Entire implies fall (inception towards death); particular implies rise (life)...it's putting together houses of cards which distracts ones discernment (doom/doms) and attention (doom/domė) from it. ~ https://www.etymonline.com/word/doom

The only question

There can be only solution (inception towards death) towards problem (life)...question vs answer represents a circular distraction from the natural line of progress.

The only question...The next question

That's the cancer growing within the mind of gentiles...a contradiction (only vs next) exponentially growing into a clusterfuck. How could a mind get out of this circle while "only" is being ignored for "next"?

government bailout

Gentiles represent the minds governed by artifice suggested by a jew, which in return represents the bailing (to release) out of form (life) within flow (inception towards death).

Inception implies the "bailing-in" of life; death implies the "bailing-out" of life...a jew suggests artifice to distract gentiles from nature which represents mind (ment) control (govern).

to bind the fate of the stockmarket

Gentiles represent the life "stock" of each jew; any jewish suggestion aiming at gentile consent represents the "market", and consent given to any suggestion represents the "binding" of gentile fate.

to force the government

A mind controlled (rolled into a circle) ignores the animating force of natural delineation.

The real worry is that they then take all

The suggestion that one within all can TAKE ALL...is fake. It's mosaic (puzzle) law aka making whole by fitting pieces together. It's a jew tempting gentiles to play fake puzzle with reality itself.

feeding that into the system

Sys (together) stem (to stand) implies gentiles standing together by under-standing jewish suggestions like artificial intelligence/inteligo (to understand). Within such a system... participants represent the fodder, like for example users of the world wide web are representing the fodder for the crawler who spun the web.

a powerful citizen prediction model

Ignoring reality (perception) for fiction (suggestion)...that's the most powerful citizen prediction model, because reality moves forwards, while fiction tempts those within reality to burden self by holding onto.

Among gentiles holding onto artifice..each jew represents a data-center aka the centralized control of any artificial data given to gentiles.

the Rehoboam

The most advanced AI isn't AI, but reality advancing forwards, which most within ignore for artifice.

pure theory

Speculation (theory) cannot be pure since it implies a division of SPEC (particular) and ATION (whole)...whole implies pure; particular implies impure.

Only within a purification process (inception towards death) can potential impurity (life) come into being.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

accusation

ACCUSE (a cause)...there can be only one cause (perceivable) for each effect (perception) within. Accusation by suggestion implies ACCURSE (a curse) which evokes excommunication aka cutting one off from the community with others.

Coming into being within accusation implies by excommunication aka by division from one another. Democratic politics is about managing the strength (cratic) of the community (demo) by excommunicating anyone who doesn't fit in.

CURSIVE can only be written by EFFECT within CAUSE...AFFECT to another tempts effect to ignore cause, while getting cursed.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Quantum physics.... no one gets it

a) Quantum/quant (sum)... natural physic implies differentiation from one another; artificial physicism tempts one to ignore that by summoning differences together.

b) That (motion) which differentiates (matter)...one cannot get aka take physical possession of, while being physically dispersed within it.

Aether with spirit torn from it, with being torn from it

Aether > spirit > essence (being) aka motion > momentum > matter...it's the division of motion through momentum which represents the torn apart (inception towards death) matter (life).

Aeather/aithēr/aidh - "to burn" implies towards the burned offering aka motion animating the spark of life within matter.

it will never ever be "intuitively understood".

a) Never contradicting ever is based on ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything perceivable, when consenting to any suggestion of another.

b) Understanding implies submission (standing-under)...not intuition (insight aka sight within).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

it starts 300k years ago in a place scientists didn't even know

Sleight of hand right there...science/scio (to know; to perceive) implies each ones perception right now; not any suggestion about 300k years before or after.

One cannot perceive (science) 300k years, but one can effortlessly utilize suggestion to tempt another into being held accountable to numbers.

it starts

Only within all light does spectrum offer each ray/race (life) a start (life) and finish (death)...neither of which one can perceive from in-between.

mapped

To map implies "drawing upon a plane surface representing a part or whole of the earth's surface or the heavens, with the various points drawn in proportion and in corresponding positions"...doing so draws together each race light divides apart from one another.

Race implies the sentience (sentence) of each...not points (end of sentence) drawn among many.

Samuel George Morton

Monogenism vs polygenism...it ain't a conflict unless one chooses a side. Light (mono) > spectrum (poly) > ray/race (transfer of mono through poly).

Hidden Origins

There can be only one origin which reveals everything (perceivable) through each thing (perception)... it's the suggestions from one another which tempt ones perception into hiding.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

God must be so mad.

Mad implies dis-ordered aka divided within Gods order or in-sane aka within Gods sound. God cannot become mad...only anyone coming into being within God can become mad.

Sleight of hand for madness: "I'm mad as hell and I'm not gonna TAKE this anymore". Taking what is God given shapes madness.

chickens

God supplies all to each...many ignore this by permitting few to supply the demand of many. That's the origin of mass murder.

To amass implies "heaping up for oneself"...that's how each chosen one amasses gentiles. Mass graves will continue until each gentile resists the temptation to join a mass/mess.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Problem implies solution...only during a solution can each problem be thrown forwards. Nature doesn't hide anything...it dissolves (inception towards death) each problem (life).

drug companies hide behind shell companies so you can't sue

Ones consent to suggested drug (to dry); company (to feed together) and suing (to follow) represents the artificial shell oneself builds to hide from nature.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have you been initiated?

Inception represents the initiation of life into the process of dying aka the beginning of each beings natural rite of passage.

Joining any fraternal alliance obscures ones discernment against (contra) inception aka birth-control. This is why many so called initiations suggest a second birth; rebirth; born anew; revival; resurrection; resurgence; reincarnation; rejuvenescence; return; awakening etc.

In short...Initial aka ALL and each one IN IT.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

destroying the middle class

Few suggest classism to establish class-consciousness among many, which destroys them, because the middle (life) of nature (inception towards death) has to be free from one another to build (living) during destruction (dying).

poor people

Poverty aka artificial destitution implies ones ignorance of natural prosperity. All of nature (perceivable) is offered to each native (perception)...that's prosperity. Destitution is based on ones consent to the suggestion of another aka banksters banking trust.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are lazy people now a conspiracy?

To sustain laissez-faire capitalism at the top requires lazy debtors at the bottom, and diligent drones in the middle.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

food supply

Food implies demand; hunger implies supply. Few artificially supply the demand to distract many from the natural supply demanding adaptation.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

"If you're into evil, you're a friend of mine...You got me ringin' Hell's bells" ~ https://genius.com/Ac-dc-hells-bells-lyrics

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Notice the video opening with saying that Jung studied various religious traditions such as "Christianity; Buddhism; Hinduism; Gnosticism"...yet deliberately leaving out the jewish influence. Later on, when circumambulation comes up, it's mentioned that the jewish rite of sacrifice is based on encircling the victim, adding Jung's quote: "There's no linear evolution; there's only circumambulation"

Now let's look at Jung's profession as analytical psychologist...PSYCHO (aka psyche; animating power) implies a linear process; which by animating establishes analysis (a setting apart). It's LOGY (aka logic; circular thinking) which represents the evolution within a linear process aka a synthesis (putting together) by circumambulation.

In short...few tempting many to ignore "psycho" for "logy" establishes the circumambulation (circular movement) within gentiles for the jewish rite of sacrifice.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bell/bhel - "sound"...not the words articulated within natural sound by a forked tongued reptile who creeps among a lower frequency to avoid detection.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

post-death revelation story

The process of dying (inception towards death) represents the revelation of living aka of the potential to grow during loss. Stories are told to burden the one storing them within memory, which makes growing harder.

The struggle to grow represents odyssey; the self inflicted burden represents the underworld.

bardos

Post as in "after" tempts one to ignore post/por - "forth" aka the process of dying putting forth each one living within, thereby implying an intermediate state of essential (life) transference (inception towards death).

standard

Few suggest stories to tempt many to store them within memory, thereby enforcing a standard aka a stationary position as the inversion of ones mobile position.

Nature moves being...beings suggest standards to one another to distract from motion.

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jung

Shabbos goy to Freud and Bleuler.

What if the clarity you were searching for is waiting on the other side of getting completely loss?

Light gives clarity by moving forwards, within which each ray comes into being. Searching forwards for clarity tempts one to ignore origin for outcome, thereby obscuring ones sight in-between competing sides.

As for completion aka com (together) plet (to fill) ion (action)...action (inception towards death) drains reaction (life) which allows growth within loss.

view more: Next ›