Yeah it's blinding you man. You said yourself the interview seemed questionable. That's the entire issue. How does it help the cause to make a news report based on something "questionable" (i.e. fake)?
And once you know a group is posting fake stories based on AI fabrications, you're only listening to them to be lied to.
The People's Voice has changed its name twice since inception after getting called out for being a disinfo rag. It was formerly called News Punch and Your News Wire.
Controlled opposition mixing truth with lies.
Let me help. He is spewing a pile of bs based on AI generated slop, so people might share this and look stupid. His job is to push people away from the truth by mixing it with lies.
The confirmation bias is the bait.
You should look more into it. The lover-boy method they teach is included in legal definitions of sex trafficking as a manipulative tactic employed.
That's just the tip of the iceberg, Tate has admitted to so much on camera it's ridiculous. He is by his own words a criminal.
They are part of this alt media fake opposition clique. Why would a supposed Catholic be promoting a guy who fake-converted to Christianity then Islam? One who created a course on pimping women into porn?
This whole thing is of the devil, and not to be trusted.
Controlled opposition exposing themselves again. Nick wants to bring his flock into the Tate-sphere of influence. https://x.com/NickJFuentes/status/2078668974946975834
In fact all of X suggested content is just a cesspool of controlled opposition, ragebait, Israeli shills, MAGA tards, and race hustlers.
Seems like a deliberate rugpull so they can buy up the infrastructure for pennies on the dollar.
Difference being, Christians have no Talmud. All the many false or pseudo-Christians have no excuse when they are compared to what scripture actually teaches.
All it comes down to is, are you born again or not. Are you surrendered to the Lord or are you creating false gospels to justify your sin? Professing christian do this too, but the Talmud is testament to the same practice put into writing. To even have a chance at salvation you must first reject the Talmud and that entire wicked tradition.
And that should be the charge, not that Judaism teaches this
Nope, it's both. The fact they are having serious discussion on this shows it is very much taught in Judaism by trusted authorities (rabbis).
This is an exercise in justifying cheating gentiles by a lot of rabbis. Glad there is some opposition, but the point stands that this is very much part of Judaism. And the proof is in the pudding, it's clearly manifested at scale among organized Jewry.
If you follow any of these teachings, I encourage you to repent and submit to the holy spirit. Cheers.
First, the fact there are these dialogues at all of Jewish rabbis trying to justify ways to deceive and steal from non-Jews is an indictment in and of itself.
Secondly please state where it declares the majority view is that you cannot cheat or deceive a non-Jew in that 113 section. The progression I saw was first one rabbi stated you could, another said it would be a problem with sanctification of God's name, then a further opinion saying the loophole is dividing cases up into categories of those which do or do not harm God's name, and finally concluding this exception applies to non-Jews who aren't Noahide followers essentially, and then the counterpoint you mentioned. They can be cheated if they aren't submissive to Jews in other words, according to certain respected teachers. This is consistent with the general arc of Judaism seeing themselves as the rightful masters of Gentiles.
Even if we can find a statement that this is not majority opinion, which I saw no explicit reference to, this is written in their catalog of respected rabbinical teachings to be pulled from by modern Jews to justify what they wish.
In what kind of religion would a respected authority even posit this argument?
The Gemara cites another statement related to stealing from a gentile. Rav Beivai bar Giddel says that Rabbi Shimon Ḥasida says: It is prohibited to rob a gentile, but it is permitted to retain his lost item, i.e., one is not required to return it to him.
There should not be a book of rabbis discussing this, as if it were some contentious issue. The answer should be "return the item, the end". This book shows there are rabbis teaching this stuff. And they often just leave a wide loophole related to interpretation over if something desecrates God's name or not.
In a case where there is a concern that retention of an article lost by a gentile will result in the desecration of God’s name, it is prohibited even to retain a gentile’s lost item.
So as long as you (or your rabbi) justify that in this instance it doesn't desecrate God's name, then steal from the Gentile. They can cite rabbinical opinion from the Talmud to back it up
Thanks for posting a source, but your source is about as damning as critics say it is.
Right before 113b starts they are discussing deceiving a gentile to "vindicate the Jew"
In the case of a Jew and a gentile who approach the court for judgment in a legal dispute, if you can vindicate the Jew under Jewish law, vindicate him, and say to the gentile: This is our law. If he can be vindicated under gentile law, vindicate him, and say to the gentile: This is your law. And if it is not possible to vindicate him under either system of law, one approaches the case circuitously, seeking a justification to vindicate the Jew.
Then there is some discussion, but it appears they ultimately decide that any gentile who is not abiding by their Noahide laws (i.e. not a goy puppet) can be screwed over.
It is not difficult, as this ruling that permits the court to deceive a gentile is issued with regard to a regular gentile, whereas that verse, which teaches that it is prohibited to deceive a gentile, is stated with regard to a gentile who resides in Eretz Yisrael and observes the seven Noahide mitzvot
What they actually do is distinguish between a case involving "consideration of the sanctification/desecration of God’s name. " and when a situation does not, in their opinion, have that consideration. In other words, they find the loopholes to deceive and steal.
the reason that the court does not employ trickery in order to vindicate the Jew is only because there is the consideration of the sanctification of God’s name. Consequently, if there is no consideration of the sanctification of God’s name, the court does approach the case circuitously. Apparently, it is permitted to deceive a gentile.
In fact if you keep reading, rabbis assert that it is lawful to "not return" a lost item of a gentile as well as absolving themselves from any loan they paid to a gentile.
Fuentes says he is jealous that Israel is allowed to "kick ass" and take people's stuff. He says America needs to start doing the same. This means, of course, conquering our neighbors.
This looks like controlled opposition leading people into the same agenda as Trump. It leads to the North American Technate.
There is some combination of psychological and psychological effects. We know from VAERS that the jab can impact mental health for some people.
I don't notice it across the board, but on occasion I see it. I was recently watching a gamer channel and looked back at his work at or before covid. Back then seemed a lot more normal and less spergy. Now he has some weird emotional outburts when he dies in a game that just don't look right, especially for a grown man.
I know such people tend to be man-children to begin with, but the difference was significant.
Wait, a platform originally made to host Trump supporters is controlled by jews? Color me shocked.
And in the video they are singing songs to it. So strange.
https://www.reddit.com/r/sportswiki/comments/1ubqv1k/a_26meter_70ton_lionel_messi_statue_has_been/
There's a man who was supposed to stab five people, no shirt on, sweatpants, not an ounce of blood on him or the blades. You only see pictures of him vandalizing a door, that's it.
The devil is dancing a jig. All according to plan.
At this point I'm convinced they want a global depression.
Would be funny if the fake fracture makes the real one worse.
I'm not saying "this is it". But rhetoric and precedent matter. Once said they can not be unsaid.
It does seem like good cop bad cop.
But even with a fake split, they are rhetorically setting up Israel to be blamed for the oil shock as things progress.
Oh, thanks. I tried to delete this one with the typo, not sure what happened.
In an unusual move, we're seeing some of the harshest rhetoric yet from a US administration scolding Israel.
It almost makes me think this war will be used by the Beast to start truly turning on the Harlot Israel. Or perhaps it is all just a Zionist trick.
But let's say we see the biggest economic crash in US history from this Hormuz shortage kicking in. Based on this rhetoric, Israel is now in the hot-seat to take the blame, and rightfully so, but that sets up an entire discussion on the value of Israel's "friendship" or lack thereof.
IMHO it could go either way. I don't see Israhell as the end goal of the devil, but just another chess piece in the game. It can rise or fall.
In an unusual move, we're seeing some of the harshest rhetoric yet from a US administration scolding Israel.
It almost makes me think this war will be used by the Beast to start truly turning on the Harlot Israel. Or perhaps it is all just a Zionist trick.
IMHO it could go either way. I don't see Israel as the end goal of the devil, but just another chess piece in the game. It can rise or fall.
Didn't say "the" antichrist in fact. But clearly an antichrist.
I think he is the last days "little horn" and part of the end times.