The Six-Pointed Star is going into its fourth edition. There have been thousands of letters over the years and comments are available upon request. The questions which are asked of this author are:
What made you even remotely curious that the six-pointed star might not be "Jewish" After all, it is called the "Star of David" and has it not become the international insignia of Jewishness and the State of Israel?
The controversy and the challenge are answered in the book. The quest began at York University, Ontario, Canada, when an Orthodox Jewish friend of mine was investigating Messianic Judaism. Our intellectual conversation covered many topics which included the so-called Star of David, which he said he did not use as the symbol G-d really gave the children of Israel was the seven-branched Menorah. Being a journalist, he challenged me to explore the six-pointed star. And I accepted the challenge, with the plan that I would prove its Jewishness. After all, I wore one and felt I had to defend it, even to him. That was the summer of 1979 and the research took me four years to complete. I found a few Jews who knew it was not Jewish, and these are mentioned in the book. Others did not think about it, and most did not care whether it was orignially occult or not - they did not think it mattered. I checked Jewish sources and all their encyclopaedias attested that it
was not originally Jewish and was not used as the symbol for any of the twelve tribes of Israel. Jewish sources said it wasn't originally Jewish. So, what was it? That took four years of research. From archive to archive, library to library...history book to history book.
The first mention of the star was in Amos 5:26 regarding the trek from Egypt to Canaan.Then in 922 B.C., when Solomon married the daughter of Pharoah and went into magic and witchcraft and built an altar to Ashtoroth and Moloch. The book traces the six pointed star from Egypt to Solomon, to Arab Magic and Witchcraft, to Druid use(references are documented). The book traces the star through Freemasonry usage to Mayer Amschel Bauer, who, in the 17th century, changed his name to depict the red sixpointed star (or shield) which he had hung on his door in Germany, and thus began the family of "Red Shield" or Rothschild. The research carried on through this family, to their court of arms, to Cabala, to Astrology, to Hitler and his putting a yellow six-pointed star on all Jews during the holocaust, to the Zionist symbol, and finally to the flag of the State of Israel and beyond.
Because this symbol is comprised of a six within a six within a six (6 points, 6 triangles, 6 sides of the hexagon in the middle) the research also included a look at the 666 prophecies in the Book of Daniel etc., regarding the "wilful King" (anti-Christ) and the "mark of the beast". The Scriptural significance of the number seven and a Biblical description of the real Messiah and the seven-branched Candlestick (Menorah) which God gave to the children of Israel as an everlasting covenant (which is also mentioned in the New Testament) is covered. All the sources are written at the bottom of each page making it easy for readers to see and check for themselves. I started out to defend this symbol, but ended up shocked and quite devasted with the evidence gleaned from the academic research. It is the only book on the origin and history of the six-pointed star or hexagram. Have a good read, check the references yourself, and I would be happy to hear your comments. All the best to you
It can now be understood how the hidden power is able to transmit its will invisibly in the whole pyramid of masonic workshops. Indeed if two or three members of a superior group, having agreed upon themselves, take part in a meeting of a subordinate group they can easily get their suggestions adopted since their entente is unknown; according to need they will take the necessary time.
It is for this reason that the will is usuallv transmitted by means of suggestion rather than command, for the latter would risk the discovery and compromising of the immediately superior authority and thereby of the supreme direction.
It is only when the hidden authority believes itself strong enough to be immovable that it gives more definite orders through the medium of freemasonry as is the case in France to-day.
This superposition of secret societies also explains the extraordinary manner in which secrecy is maintained. The hidden power has succeeded in impressing masonic brains with a veritable cult of secrecy. This discipline is imposed with absolute rigour from the very first entrance in freemasonry. It is maintained and renewed at each move upwards. It is recalled to mind again and again although the great majority of masons have no secret to betray. A special state of mind is thus created which explains why those masons who, after long years, reach the really high degrees never betray the order.
For the rest, we know little of high masonry. The Grand Orient and the Grand Lodge of France are lodges of the Ist 2nd and 3rd degree. Above this visible masonry there is another leading from the 4th to the 14th degree, of which we have the ritual but hardly know anything. We do not know were their meetings take place, how their lodges are named, nor their aims, philosophy and above all we do not know their work. It seems that a new cut is made between the 16th and 17th Degree and that from the latter begins the higher masonry which reaches the 32d degree. It is there in all probability that the higher direction is found and international connection maintained. From tle 33rd degree we begin once more to know something of what. happens. These are the supreme councils whose importance may be more apparent than real.
Outside of freemasonry proper there are many irregular masonries such as the Illuminati of Weishaupt, the rite of Memphis and of Misraim ; the ordo Templi orientis directed by Aleister Crowley successor of Theodor Reuss. Generally the degrees are priced and can be purcliased. There is the universal order of the Bnai Brith. There are great associations which are powerful in wealth and influence such as the Rosicrucians of California. There is the theosophy, linked with masonry, of Mts Besant who works with the Grand Orient. The adepts of all these societies are often « illuminés », followers of the occult, ill balanced minds, but behind these fools there are people to be taken seriously, such as Rudolph Steiner, whose anthroposophical society is remarkably organized, a mason of considerable worth and much superior to the vulgar anti-clerical of the lower lodges. There are little known sects such as the Ancient Catharres (round Albi and Beziers) connected with the gnostic catholic church with its shockingly cynical ritual [In many occult sects phallic workship is in honour].
In a word there is an extraordinary crop of societies more or less secret and more or less masonic of whose existence the public is generally totally ignorant, but whose importance is sometimes very real. They all work more or less in the same general direction and their main points have been thus summarized in a book called the Nameless Order as corresponding to the six points of the kabbalistic star:
Religious. — By philosophy or mysticism or empiric science to undermine and discredit all Christian creed.
Ethical. —- To corrupt morality of northern races with oriental codes —- weaken marriage bonds — destroy family life; abolish inheritance, even heritable names.
Aesthetic. — Cult of the ugly and aberrant in art, literature, music and drama — modernism — crude orientalism — degeneracy.
Sociological. — Abolition of aristocracy — creation of ploutocracy, moncy standard — by vulgar display, extravagance, corruption, to create revolt in proletarian minds, hence class-war.
Industrial and financial. — Having destroyed ideals of craftmanship and pride in handicraft, set up golden serpent of profit. Standardisation of cheap and soddy — centralization — cartel and trust leading to abolition of private ownership and to state monopoly.
Political. — To kill patriotism and pride of race ; in name of progress and evolution set up internation alism as ideal of human brotherhood. Thus undermine national unity, weaken all governments and so prepare way for their super-government which shall rule the world.
I'm not watching three hours if they can't even spell "Phoenician" in the thumbnail.
The star of Remphan and Chiun was in Israel a thousand years before the hexagram was. They're not related. The best candidate for the original star of Remphan is actually the bronze Nehushtan or poled snake, which is represented by "$" rather than "*". Remphan (Rephaim) means Titans, and Chiun means Saturn. It's true that there's a cult history connecting the Nephilim to the Canaanites to Nehushtan and Moloch, but this does not have evidence of involving a "star" as we conceive of it (i.e. a polygram). The concept of "star" was not semiotically associated with the polygram shape, but with various representations of points of light, such as crosses in circles.
It's associated with neither David nor Solomon. It's illogical to say it's not David's but it is Solomon's. Fact is that both legends were far backdated, mostly by Arabs. Graham's book says (p. 24), as to Solomon's idolatry, "Part of the evidence is the six-pointed star, which was called the Seal of Solomon from then on"; but the etymology of "seal of Solomon" tapers off only a little prior to Muhammad and has no Jewish origin.
The earliest Jewish legend of Solomon's sorcery says that he had an inscription containing God's name, possibly just a simple tetragrammaton (no data about a particular shape), which was used to control a demon named Asmodeus. This is clearly a later legend based on a Zoroastrian legend of controlling the demon Khashm-Dev. That legend, a thousand years later, was combined with Arabic geometry to propose a particular sigil that eventually resolved as being a hexagram.
Graham correctly begins by noting the hexagram is not Jewish (see my first link), and notes that Amos's star is indeed associated with Moses, but then he claims there's evidence of Solomon (that marriage was probably the 960s or 950s instead, certainly not 922 since he was dead when Shishak subjugated his son Rehoboam in 926; probably a transciption error by Graham, who puts David's birth more correctly ca. 1040). There's no hexagram in Solomon because there are very few records of Solomon anyway. There are many hexagrams and polygrams in ancient world history, and the Egypt route does not connect to the Arab route. After the Arabs the research is probably correct.
Your link mentions the tomb of Leon ben David containing a hexagram, but that is a random occurrence based on the hexagram being a generic symbol of peace; Gershon Scholem finds it only as early as 6th century, in agreement with my cite of him in my first link. To correct another implied error, the word "hex" is from a German root related to "hag" ("hagzissa"), but the prefix "hexa-" is not related and is from the common Latin roots for "six", which in German is the completely different "sehs".
The idea of connecting the hexagram directly to 666 is very recent and was never used until recent semiology (though the basic connection of hexagram to 6, for mankind, is well-known and the connection of 6 to 666 is also obvious). There's no 666 in Daniel, there's just a figure who templates over the 666 figure in Revelation.
There's little to say about Masonry as it's not here connected to semiology; however, the idea that the hexagram has any specialness in Masonry is exaggerated, as they will use or abandon any symbol as they see fit.
TLDR: Graham has a lot of good research and is a well-meaning traditional religious Jew. However, actual appearance of the hexagram in Judaism is not older than the 4th century and all attribution backward is ordinary pseudepigraphy. His description of the risks and history of idolatry is otherwise helpful even if it doesn't depend on the hexagram. But calling the hexagram "the" star of Remphan is a historical failure even though it's modernly been adopted as "a" star of Remphan.
I'm not watching three hours if they can't even spell "Phoenician" in the thumbnail.
You can't spell "Phoenician" without the word "Canaanite"!
Not only did Nimrod kill and eat the fair-skinned descendants of Shem, in his fury and hatred he often burned them alive. The type of human sacrifice involving the eating of the slaughtered human victims derived its name from the combined names of his uncle, Canaan, and the demon god Baal, the two names being combined to form the word "cannibal." Nimrod was also known in ancient history by the names of Marduk, Bel, and Merodach. Because of his importance in its history, Babylon was known as the Land of Nimrod. Nimrod is also cited in the most ancient Masonic constitutions as the founder of Freemasonry.
TLDR: Graham has a lot of good research and is a well-meaning traditional religious Jew. However, actual appearance of the hexagram in Judaism is not older than the 4th century and all attribution backward is ordinary pseudepigraphy. His description of the risks and history of idolatry is otherwise helpful even if it doesn't depend on the hexagram. But calling the hexagram "the" star of Remphan is a historical failure even though it's modernly been adopted as "a" star of Remphan.
You can't prove shit about the so called "Star of David" because it actually is the 666 Hex star of Remphan aka Moloch aka Ba'al aka Saturn aka Nimrod aka Osiris that was always used for "Black Magick" and "Ritual Child Sacrifice", that the ancient ancestors of modern day Edomite/Canaanite/Kenite "Jews" worshiped!
The issue is that to pursue the truth we want to remove strands that aren't true, so that people don't throw out the whole presentation. True, there's a big satanic sacrificial system connected through these periods, but if we speak inaccurately about it then people will not listen. And on points where I can be confident something is inaccurate, I say so. Facts can be debated without resorting to obscenity or invective; it seems you think I'm harming your narrative when I'm seeking to improve it by affirming the correct parts of it. I would hope your grasp of your narrative is not that fragile.
Historically, Nimrod (Naram-Sin) probably did burn Semitic (Shemite) babies alive and eat them, as indicated by evidence of his gods and practices, but that is not the origin of the word "cannibal", which comes from "Carib" and "kari'na" meaning person. If the devil is causing a recycling of the sounds of Canaan and Baal, let's say that directly instead of saying it is of human derivation.
Bel-Baal was then a title of any god or deified human, so Nimrod could easily have been called that. However, in his day Marduk-Merodach was a minor deity called Amar-Utuk (derived from Utu or Shamash the sun, also allied with Sin the moon), found in a list of minor underworld deities from Abu Salabikh as d-Utu-Amar. We have an old inscription (YOS 9:2) taken by Lambert and Beaulieu as saying the ruler of Babbar (Babilu-Babylon) built a temple to d-Amar-Utu, but this hardly means the ruler and the god were the same person. (Add: Both Babbar and Sippar may mean "sunny" in Sumerian, later punned as "gods' gate".) The ruler's name is preserved as "son of Ahu-Ilum [semitic for "God's brother"], man of Ilum-Beli, man of Ur-Kubi" [Kubi is an even more obscure demon or consortium]. If we take this as Nimrod building Etemenanki, he is not merged with Marduk at that time (though we might infer that his uncle Canaan is merging with El-Ilum). The merger of Nimrod with Marduk was over a millennium later in the Babylon revival; he wasn't "Marduk" during his lifetime, and so if we want to say the religion merged him in much later we should say that.
The hexagram may today be associated with 666, hag-hexing, Remphan, Moloch-Baal, and Saturn (and thereby Nimrod and Osiris), by very modern imaginative combination, but this recent nexus is not its original meaning. If we just want to point out the hexagram has been recently roped into the cluster of symbols for this sacrificial system, we should say that.
By the same token, Edom, Canaan, Kenan, and Judah are all easily distinguished, as are their religions, and we should not act like they are all one. In particular, the religion of Judah is testified as monotheism and was distinct from the polytheism infiltrated into it by his descendants. If you want to say that all these peoples had common elements, including the Jews having elements of baalism in their professed monotheism (much as many nominal Christians do today), we should say that, like the Bible does.
Since you appear to reject the Jews as a race, it's odd that you should take the testimony of Graham, who intends it as faithful to Judaism. Just as odd as that you should affirm him in saying the hexagram really is the sign of Solomon but not the sign of David, without any evidence, mechanism, or rationale. Semiotics can be made an exact science.
I don't give a flying fuck about your wall of "NONSENSE" text because even the ancient Chinese People used the 6 sided HEX of Satan/lucifer for "Black Magick" in ancient times!
the hypothesis explains why the hexagram indicated success to the diviner and injury to his opponent. That was the purpose of black magic.13 The Chou 1i says, describing a part of the ancient administration,14" The department consisted of an official and four assistants. They were in charge of the extermination of the poisonous k7u. They drove it out by spells, and attacked it by efficacious herbs. They directed those who could control k7u, and watched the effect." 15 Cheng K'ang-ch'eng's commentary on this passage in the Chou 1i quotes the criminal law of the Han dynasty as saying, " Those who dare to poison people with ku, or teach others to do it, will be publicly executed." The law of the Han was based on earlier codes, going back at least to the fourth century B. c., and it is not unlikely that the practice of ku was forbidden from the time of the first legal codes in China, perhaps long before. If k7ualways represented a method of injuring others, this is what we would expect, since black magic is usually illegal. 13 European scholars have done little work on the subject of ku.
Your link shows that the Chinese used 64 "hexagrams". These were not star-shaped hexagrams or hexagons, but patterns of six parallel lines, which could each be either whole or broken (thus 2^6=64 total). So, yes, the Chinese used a pattern of 6s in the I Ching, without any stars, which is consistent with what I said.
Let's try it a little simpler.
You can't find the Star of David in any ancient scriptures
Correct.
because it never existed,
Correct in that David never used it.
it's actually the Star of Remphan/Chiun/Moloch
It's not the original star of Remphan-Chiun intended by Amos and Stephen, but it's become a star of Remphan-Chiun. Similarly it could not have been a star of Moloch because it was never used in Judaism until after 300 AD.
/Saturn, the Talisman of Saturn
I have no problem saying that Saturnism is satanism and the hexagram star goes very far back with it; for instance, the Sri Sukta ca. 1100 BC describes a yantra of square, circle, and triangle patterns that would include a hexagram. But there's no evidence that the hexagram was singled out as a mark of satanism early on. If we said that satanists had in mind to use setup symbols that could be diverted onto the hexagram track later, maybe, but that's a totally different assertion from saying the hexagram is the star of Saturn.
& the Seal of King Solomon
I showed you that there's no tradition from Solomon that he used the star, as that comes from Arab corruption. If we go prior to the Arab layer and prior to the Zoroastrian layer, where Asmodeus comes from Khashm-Dev or Aeshma Daeva (the Ire Devil), we find that Solomon's actual defense was the name of God (Gittin 68a:10-12): "A chain onto which Name was carved, and a ring onto which Name was carved .... the chain around enclosed him .... The Name of your Master is upon you." So the seal of Solomon, if anything, was the name Yahweh. Is a potential "seal of Solomon" nowadays the hexagram? Could be, times change.
who was a necromancer that summoned demons to build his temple
I have no problem assuming demons were involved. If you track back the 40 plus 390 years prophesied by Ezekiel backward from Zerubbabel's altar of 536 BC, it points to Solomon's temple altar of 966 BC (and Jeroboam's idolatrous altar of 926 BC); so Ezekiel implied that the whole period of the temple had idolatry alongside.
TLDR: You count yourself smarter than these monotheists, so don't fall for their sources but stick to historical research. If you want to point out that all monotheism has had infiltrated idolatry, point out correctly which part happened when, so that your case is listened to rather than laughed off. It's also a good idea for you to propose some other, superior way of apprehending Truth so that you're not dismissed as just as amoral as the people you criticize. Don't just doom, be the solution.
The Six Pointed Star by Dr. O.J. Graham (1984) https://archive.org/details/the-six-pointed-star-its-origin-and-usage-graham-o.-j/mode/1up
Rothschild: Shield of Edom aka Magen Edom | Synagogue of Satan | Rich Tidwell Sermon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2mE_6_Zrc0
The Secret Powers Behind Revolution: Freemasonry and Judaism by Léon de Poncins (1929) https://archive.org/details/leon-de-poncins-the-secret-powers-behind-revolution.-freemasonry-and-judaism-1928-2/mode/1up
I'm not watching three hours if they can't even spell "Phoenician" in the thumbnail.
The star of Remphan and Chiun was in Israel a thousand years before the hexagram was. They're not related. The best candidate for the original star of Remphan is actually the bronze Nehushtan or poled snake, which is represented by "$" rather than "*". Remphan (Rephaim) means Titans, and Chiun means Saturn. It's true that there's a cult history connecting the Nephilim to the Canaanites to Nehushtan and Moloch, but this does not have evidence of involving a "star" as we conceive of it (i.e. a polygram). The concept of "star" was not semiotically associated with the polygram shape, but with various representations of points of light, such as crosses in circles.
It's associated with neither David nor Solomon. It's illogical to say it's not David's but it is Solomon's. Fact is that both legends were far backdated, mostly by Arabs. Graham's book says (p. 24), as to Solomon's idolatry, "Part of the evidence is the six-pointed star, which was called the Seal of Solomon from then on"; but the etymology of "seal of Solomon" tapers off only a little prior to Muhammad and has no Jewish origin.
The earliest Jewish legend of Solomon's sorcery says that he had an inscription containing God's name, possibly just a simple tetragrammaton (no data about a particular shape), which was used to control a demon named Asmodeus. This is clearly a later legend based on a Zoroastrian legend of controlling the demon Khashm-Dev. That legend, a thousand years later, was combined with Arabic geometry to propose a particular sigil that eventually resolved as being a hexagram.
Graham correctly begins by noting the hexagram is not Jewish (see my first link), and notes that Amos's star is indeed associated with Moses, but then he claims there's evidence of Solomon (that marriage was probably the 960s or 950s instead, certainly not 922 since he was dead when Shishak subjugated his son Rehoboam in 926; probably a transciption error by Graham, who puts David's birth more correctly ca. 1040). There's no hexagram in Solomon because there are very few records of Solomon anyway. There are many hexagrams and polygrams in ancient world history, and the Egypt route does not connect to the Arab route. After the Arabs the research is probably correct.
Your link mentions the tomb of Leon ben David containing a hexagram, but that is a random occurrence based on the hexagram being a generic symbol of peace; Gershon Scholem finds it only as early as 6th century, in agreement with my cite of him in my first link. To correct another implied error, the word "hex" is from a German root related to "hag" ("hagzissa"), but the prefix "hexa-" is not related and is from the common Latin roots for "six", which in German is the completely different "sehs".
The idea of connecting the hexagram directly to 666 is very recent and was never used until recent semiology (though the basic connection of hexagram to 6, for mankind, is well-known and the connection of 6 to 666 is also obvious). There's no 666 in Daniel, there's just a figure who templates over the 666 figure in Revelation.
There's little to say about Masonry as it's not here connected to semiology; however, the idea that the hexagram has any specialness in Masonry is exaggerated, as they will use or abandon any symbol as they see fit.
TLDR: Graham has a lot of good research and is a well-meaning traditional religious Jew. However, actual appearance of the hexagram in Judaism is not older than the 4th century and all attribution backward is ordinary pseudepigraphy. His description of the risks and history of idolatry is otherwise helpful even if it doesn't depend on the hexagram. But calling the hexagram "the" star of Remphan is a historical failure even though it's modernly been adopted as "a" star of Remphan.
You can't spell "Phoenician" without the word "Canaanite"!
You can't prove shit about the so called "Star of David" because it actually is the 666 Hex star of Remphan aka Moloch aka Ba'al aka Saturn aka Nimrod aka Osiris that was always used for "Black Magick" and "Ritual Child Sacrifice", that the ancient ancestors of modern day Edomite/Canaanite/Kenite "Jews" worshiped!
The issue is that to pursue the truth we want to remove strands that aren't true, so that people don't throw out the whole presentation. True, there's a big satanic sacrificial system connected through these periods, but if we speak inaccurately about it then people will not listen. And on points where I can be confident something is inaccurate, I say so. Facts can be debated without resorting to obscenity or invective; it seems you think I'm harming your narrative when I'm seeking to improve it by affirming the correct parts of it. I would hope your grasp of your narrative is not that fragile.
Historically, Nimrod (Naram-Sin) probably did burn Semitic (Shemite) babies alive and eat them, as indicated by evidence of his gods and practices, but that is not the origin of the word "cannibal", which comes from "Carib" and "kari'na" meaning person. If the devil is causing a recycling of the sounds of Canaan and Baal, let's say that directly instead of saying it is of human derivation.
Bel-Baal was then a title of any god or deified human, so Nimrod could easily have been called that. However, in his day Marduk-Merodach was a minor deity called Amar-Utuk (derived from Utu or Shamash the sun, also allied with Sin the moon), found in a list of minor underworld deities from Abu Salabikh as d-Utu-Amar. We have an old inscription (YOS 9:2) taken by Lambert and Beaulieu as saying the ruler of Babbar (Babilu-Babylon) built a temple to d-Amar-Utu, but this hardly means the ruler and the god were the same person. (Add: Both Babbar and Sippar may mean "sunny" in Sumerian, later punned as "gods' gate".) The ruler's name is preserved as "son of Ahu-Ilum [semitic for "God's brother"], man of Ilum-Beli, man of Ur-Kubi" [Kubi is an even more obscure demon or consortium]. If we take this as Nimrod building Etemenanki, he is not merged with Marduk at that time (though we might infer that his uncle Canaan is merging with El-Ilum). The merger of Nimrod with Marduk was over a millennium later in the Babylon revival; he wasn't "Marduk" during his lifetime, and so if we want to say the religion merged him in much later we should say that.
The hexagram may today be associated with 666, hag-hexing, Remphan, Moloch-Baal, and Saturn (and thereby Nimrod and Osiris), by very modern imaginative combination, but this recent nexus is not its original meaning. If we just want to point out the hexagram has been recently roped into the cluster of symbols for this sacrificial system, we should say that.
By the same token, Edom, Canaan, Kenan, and Judah are all easily distinguished, as are their religions, and we should not act like they are all one. In particular, the religion of Judah is testified as monotheism and was distinct from the polytheism infiltrated into it by his descendants. If you want to say that all these peoples had common elements, including the Jews having elements of baalism in their professed monotheism (much as many nominal Christians do today), we should say that, like the Bible does.
Since you appear to reject the Jews as a race, it's odd that you should take the testimony of Graham, who intends it as faithful to Judaism. Just as odd as that you should affirm him in saying the hexagram really is the sign of Solomon but not the sign of David, without any evidence, mechanism, or rationale. Semiotics can be made an exact science.
I don't give a flying fuck about your wall of "NONSENSE" text because even the ancient Chinese People used the 6 sided HEX of Satan/lucifer for "Black Magick" in ancient times!
https://pdfcoffee.com/the-black-magic-in-china-known-as-ku-pdf-free.html
Your link shows that the Chinese used 64 "hexagrams". These were not star-shaped hexagrams or hexagons, but patterns of six parallel lines, which could each be either whole or broken (thus 2^6=64 total). So, yes, the Chinese used a pattern of 6s in the I Ching, without any stars, which is consistent with what I said.
Let's try it a little simpler.
Correct.
Correct in that David never used it.
It's not the original star of Remphan-Chiun intended by Amos and Stephen, but it's become a star of Remphan-Chiun. Similarly it could not have been a star of Moloch because it was never used in Judaism until after 300 AD.
I have no problem saying that Saturnism is satanism and the hexagram star goes very far back with it; for instance, the Sri Sukta ca. 1100 BC describes a yantra of square, circle, and triangle patterns that would include a hexagram. But there's no evidence that the hexagram was singled out as a mark of satanism early on. If we said that satanists had in mind to use setup symbols that could be diverted onto the hexagram track later, maybe, but that's a totally different assertion from saying the hexagram is the star of Saturn.
I showed you that there's no tradition from Solomon that he used the star, as that comes from Arab corruption. If we go prior to the Arab layer and prior to the Zoroastrian layer, where Asmodeus comes from Khashm-Dev or Aeshma Daeva (the Ire Devil), we find that Solomon's actual defense was the name of God (Gittin 68a:10-12): "A chain onto which Name was carved, and a ring onto which Name was carved .... the chain around enclosed him .... The Name of your Master is upon you." So the seal of Solomon, if anything, was the name Yahweh. Is a potential "seal of Solomon" nowadays the hexagram? Could be, times change.
I have no problem assuming demons were involved. If you track back the 40 plus 390 years prophesied by Ezekiel backward from Zerubbabel's altar of 536 BC, it points to Solomon's temple altar of 966 BC (and Jeroboam's idolatrous altar of 926 BC); so Ezekiel implied that the whole period of the temple had idolatry alongside.
TLDR: You count yourself smarter than these monotheists, so don't fall for their sources but stick to historical research. If you want to point out that all monotheism has had infiltrated idolatry, point out correctly which part happened when, so that your case is listened to rather than laughed off. It's also a good idea for you to propose some other, superior way of apprehending Truth so that you're not dismissed as just as amoral as the people you criticize. Don't just doom, be the solution.
like, when patrick bet david says the "vault conference" i just hear him saying the "ba'al conference."
and when certain people say the name of Jesus their eyes roll back in their head.
fucking satan worshipers are out there in plain sight.
https://img.gvid.tv/i/3xeLvRgE.jpg
Scripe; noun - "professional interpreter of the jewish law"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/scribe
Does nature engrave a seal (identifying mark) upon the living transfer from inception towards death?
Summoning (to put together) contradicts de (to divide) mon (to provide)...
Third Eye, are you actually interested in getting at the truth of what the Talmud says and what Solomon and the rest did? Because you're not acting like you pursue the truth at all costs, but that you just pursue low-effort posts and comments regardless of how botlike it appears.