connecting to soul
a) Soul/sole implies one and only...connecting anything to it contradicts that.
b) Being given free will of choice implies the power of selection (analysis), which connection (synthesis) inverts.
c) Saul Alinsky in 'Rules for Radicals' wrote about how Moses was the original organizer who connected what God separated, which is what each jew does aka con (together) nectere (to bind; tie) gentiles.
Because once the connection is made, that 1 person becomes...
...a contradiction of oneself by connecting to another one. One implies divided from; not connected with.
person becomes an unstoppable force
Per (by) son (sound)...sound implies the unstoppable force, which starts (inception) and ends (death) each byproduct (life) within.
the mind aligns with greater Life (God)
a) Alignment implies thinking straight instead of circular logic.
b) God implies process of dying within which each life comes into being in-between greater/lesser.
good inevitably wins
Win/wen - "desire; strive for"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/win
Being implies growth (life) within loss (inception towards death) hence needing to resist the wanted desire to strive forwards. A jew suggests gambling (win vs lose) and moralism (good vs bad) to tempt gentiles to ignore that.
being reborn
Born implies carried (life) forth (inception towards death)...reborn implies ones response while being carried forth.
when humans connect
The hu (hue; color) of man implies the separation of light into a visible spectrum...any connection within the visible spectrum of light casts darkness upon one another.
a) There can be only "now"...before and after represent mental measurements; not physical states of perception.
b) Life being moved from inception towards death implies being within a "deadline".
c) If one chooses to ignore all perceivable for any suggestion by another, then one enters a "dark age"...letting go of suggested implies enlightenment aka ones exit out of darkness.
d) Bill implies a seal; gate implies a passage (life) in-between entering (inception) and exiting (death)...ignorance seals ones discernment thereof.
Can the chute not stay open when approaching fifty?
Most likely not a speed issue, but flying too low over artificial structures who manipulate the natural wind above. The flimsy chute offers little resistance to quick changes of wind direction, and the weight attached to the chute just waits for the opportunity to fall down.
I've always been interested in doing this
Just don't underestimate the ground and fly a little higher to be able to react (counter navigation; entanglement; spare chute etc).
On the other hand...if you're interested in doing it like him, then consider adding a woo-hoo to your Macho Man elbow-drop impression.
leads to noticing
Notice/notus/gno - "to know"...one comes into being within knowledge (perceivable) others use information (suggested) to lead one out of being.
the reason why they hate
Choosing love or hate establishes a conflict of reason (love vs hate). A jew suggests love and hate to tempt gentiles into conflict against one another.
free speech
Sound frees instrument; speech binds instruments to one another. In other words...nature frees one to articulate speech, but doing so binds one artificially.
jewish domestic
A jew knows that nature dominates being, while suggesting gentiles to submit to artifice. If ones choice submits; then a chosen one becomes dominant.
terrorism
Terror implies "fear"; -ism implies a suggested consensus. A jew suggests fear to tempt gentiles into being afraid aka to joining the consensus of terror-ism as each individual terror-ist.
will stop at nothing
Everything moves and cannot be stopped. Will can be tricked to ignore everything for nothing (nihilo aka nihilism), which stops will from discerning motion.
If one holds onto a formed word, then one ignores flowing sound.
jewish radicals
Radical/radix/root - "thoroughgoing aka to go through"...all perceivable goes through ones perception, while holding onto any suggestion prevents one from discerning that.
A jew operates within thoroughgoing nature while tempting gentiles to hold onto artifice, which establishes constipation within and among gentiles.
In short...a jew thinks straight, while tempting gentiles to get stuck within circular conflict (reason).
Nr. 1...measure and track
Consenting to any suggestion implies taking a measurement, while leaving a mark (track). Each jew tempts gentiles to willingly mark themselves by taking measurements.
Nature doesn't require a mind to take measures...it moves all perceivable inspiration through each ones perceiving mind at any moment. Choosing to take (information) ignores all given (inspiration).
Nr. 2...monitor and disrupt
Monitor/monere/men - "to think"...suggestion disrupts perception from thinking. If one measures and tracks information, then one disrupts ones perception from thinking straight.
So far...a jew doesn't have to measure; track; monitor or disrupt, because any gentile consenting to any suggested information by a jew does it to self.
Even simpler...a gentile buys the monitor from a jew to disrupt perceivable with suggested, hence selling oneself out.
we have a whole apparatus working full time
Apparatus/apparare - "towards production"...that implies nature working full time to produce each temporarily employed being within.
A jew tempts gentiles to become communist apparatchiks aka a com (together) uni (apart from one another) aka a living contradiction of how nature produces life by separation from one another.
It's the gentiles who represent the communists by believing that one (uni) can join others (com), which permits each jew to utilize the natural apparatus to remain apart aka to sustain self.
extremist
Choosing a side implies using ones choice at center to incline towards one of two extremes at either side.
A jew shapes a suggestion to tempt each gentiles choice into giving consent (want or not want), which establishes a consensus among extremists fighting each other (want vs not want).
Choosing want or not want makes one an extremist; resisting the temptation of both want or not want allows one to discern self as within need.
Need flows through form; want and not want tempts form away from flow, hence bringing currency towards banks.
From the Christian perspective...The Jesus fish (ichthys; ἰχθύς) lives in the current, and dies one the banks.
liberals
An inversion of all liberating each one within...not a plural for one to join together with others who seek to be liberated.
right wing extremists
Extreme implies measured from center, hence in-between left/right. Others suggest extremes to tempt ones interior choice to incline towards exterior sides aka clipping ones wings.
like all of our fault
a) All cannot be likened to anything...only different ones within the same all can be likened to one another.
b) Fault implies fall...only while all falls can each one within rise.
c) Blaming aka finding fault with another implies ones ignorance to rise
In reality, the system...
System implies a fiction shaped within reality.
Deep State VS the general Civilian Population
Many put themselves into a deeper state than few by turning against (versus) one another, while ignoring that general implies all generating each one within.
It's not about liberals or republicans
Is vs isn't aka liberal vs republican implies a rebranding of the same conflict...few suggest about-ism to tempt many into such a conflict.
They are the ones making the mistakes
They (plural) implies the mistake one (singular) makes when joining others. One cannot be they without contradicting self...which is a mistake only oneself can make.
the People are running around trying to keep things together
Because people (plural) turns each person (singular) against one another. Pluralism represents a consensus of singular beings holding onto one another aka establishing friction with one another aka turning against one another.
Without Gov, society...
Social/sekw - "to follow"...few suggest social-ism to govern the minds of many into following.
without anyone breaking back down
Coming into being implies all breaking (life) down (inception towards death) each one within from one another. It's the break which represents the recess aka "the inward indentation in a line of continuity".
Jacob Mortimer aka Jacob/ya'aqobh (to supplant) time of death (mort)...
Anthroposophy
Anthropo (man) + sophy (knowledge) aka perceivable knowledge flowing through each mans formed perception.
a spiritual new religious movement
Spiritual movement implies all animating each ones mind through motion...others suggest new to distract one from the ongoing flow, and religion to bind ones temporary form mentally (ideals) and physically (idols).
postulates the existence of an objective
Object implies to throw towards... https://www.etymonline.com/word/object
Being (life) thrown (inception towards death) prevents each being from physically perceiving ones inception and death, yet allows mentally discerning ones position in-between.
intellectually comprehensible spiritual
Both intellect and comprehension tempt ones form to ignore mental discernment within spiritual flow. Why? Because intelligence tempts one to gather and comprehension to seize and hold onto which ignores spiritual animation.
Followers of anthroposophy aim to...
Following another and aiming towards outcome tempts man to ignore the origin of knowledge, hence being animated by it.
a mode of thought
Mode/med - "take appropriate measures" confines thought to whatever one took hold of.
Suggested mode (taking suggested) inverts mote (being perception) within motion (perceivable).
Steiner hoped to form a spiritual movement that would free
Hope binds free will of choice towards outcome; it's TO aka being moved TOWARDS, which implies the spiritual movement which free ones choice from one another.
the human capacity for rational thought would allow
a) Misusing mind as capacitor tempts one to ignore being a resistor within generation...whose wanted temptation one needs to resist.
b) Ratio aka reason implies circular conflict aka resistor vs resistor, while burdened by capacity, which both sides fight each other over. Being implies within (life) linear (inception towards death) procession, hence the need to resist want.
contrasted the anthroposophical approach with both conventional mysticism and natural science
Suggested mysticism casts a mist over anthropos (man), while suggested scienctism inverts natural scio (to know, to perceive) aka ones perception within all perceivable knowledge.
Steiner suggested that human beings unite a physical body of substances gathered from and returning to the inorganic world
a) Consenting to any suggestion prevents ones perception from discerning any of this.
b) Being implies essence (life) in-between abstract (inception towards death) aka as above/so below. It's consenting to a suggestion which shapes essence into substance aka standing under another essence.
Ones choice consenting to a chosen ones suggestion implies trans-substantiation of essence.
in common with all living
All implies the process of dying...each one within implies living. Living within the process of dying implies as each singular unit within singularity...others suggest common-ism to tempt ones consenting mind into a plural consensus.
etheric
Motion (abstract) > momentum (ether) > matter (essence)...ether also represents the spiritual divination aka the division of animation as well as ether/aidh - "to burn" aka the burned offering (holo-caust).
all animals
Anim-al aka all animation for each animated one within...the separation of which is called hue-man (color of man aka spectrum of light/sound).
There's no such thing as "all animals" or a plural of "animal"...only all singular animation for each one within.
self-awareness unique to human beings
Aware implies of one another; self implies through one another...putting self and aware together corrupts uniqueness.
a bearer of sentience
Bearer (inception towards death) of sentience (life) implies all transference of each one within...not what each one carries within self.
Anthroposophy describes a broad evolution of human consciousness.
Anthroposophy delineates a transfer of discernment in-between a narrow/broad human spectrum, which is why each ones perception can broaden or narrow at will.
Others suggest consciousness to lure perception into a consensus, within which each one evolves (turns) against one another.
evolution possess
Taking into possession evolves (turns) into a conflict aka mine vs yours.
become atavistic
Become implies coming into being aka cause animating effect...suggested attavism tempts effect to ignore cause for affection to one another.
If motion > momentum > matter, then attavism tempts matter to hold onto other matter in hopes of learning how it came into being. Like any other suggested -ism...consenting to it shapes circular thought within linear procession.
initially a progressive direction of evolution
Being (life) implies initiated (inception) into a progressive direction (towards death)...which is linear. Evolution tempts a being to move in circles mentally (logic) and physically (reason), while ignoring linear progression, hence history repeating itself.
excessive reliance on abstraction
Aka excessive (life) reliance on abstraction (inception towards death)...abstraction gives access/excess to essence.
Anthroposophy speaks of
Sophy (knowledge) doesn't speak...it moves as perceivable inspiration through each ones perception. Others shape suggestible information into speech to distract from that.
A complex transformation
Transfer of form (life) within action (inception towards death) implies a separation from one another...not a weaving (plex) together (com).
Simple implies "free from duplicity; unmixed; one-fold"...the simple mind has to be tricked into complexity aka into burdening itself aka into the synchronicity of sin by mixing ones perception with the suggestion of another.
How would you like supportive questions to be framed?
Away from like vs dislike conflict, which supports nothing but circular confinement, while preventing one from thinking straight.
a) Human/hueman implies "colored man"...black aka "absence of visible light" contradicts that.
b) A singular rainbow shows the spectrum of each singular color within...plurality (blacks) contradicts singularity (color).
c) Right vs wrong + is vs isn't implies one side vs another side aka a plural (black) conflict among singular (color) beings. It's the conflict which clouds brightness with darkness.
a) Human/hueman implies "colored man"...black aka "absence of visible light" contradicts that.
b) A singular rainbow shows the spectrum of each singular color within...plurality (blacks) contradicts singularity (color).
c) Right vs wrong + is vs isn't implies one side vs another side aka a plural (black) conflict among singular (color) beings. It's the conflict which clouds brightness with darkness.
a) Human/hueman implies "colored man"...black aka "absence of visible light" contradicts that.
b) A singular rainbow shows the spectrum of each singular color within...plurality (blacks) contradicts singularity (color).
c) Right vs wrong + is vs isn't implies one side vs another side aka a plural (black) conflict among singular (color) beings. It's the conflict which clouds brightness with darkness.
earth carrying the rest?
Both earth and the rest represent matter...that's your mind on thermodynamics establishing friction between shapes of matter.
Before matter implies motion, hence before (being forwarded)...it's motion which carries earth and the rest forwards, and it's your mind which ignores the foundation of being (life) carried forwards (inception towards death).
like the center of a disc
a) Only at the center of motion can there be a shape aka matter.
b) Motion implies same, within which matter can be shaped differently or alike one another.
c) Disc/disk/dikein - "to throw"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/disk
Nature throws (inception towards death) being (life), hence from a flat line into living shape, while giving the opportunity to reshape.
anti arctic are the edges?
Not the edges of matter, but motion moving through matter aka knowl-EDGE...hence being (life) carried in-between opposites (inception/death) aka anti-arktos.
a) Motion > momentum > matter generates heat at center, while cooling the circumference. Suggested thermodynamics tempts one to ignore that for the exchange in-between matter aka heat by friction...like reasoning against one another for example.
b) Antarctic aka anti (against; opposite) + arktos (to bear; carry; transfer)...
c) What's in the box? Each ones perception in-between left/right + up/down + front/back. Asking others establishes a circular logic within self, turning outwards into reasoning against others... hence a circle drawn around the box.
Before demonym there's a phonetic origin...A JAY BANG A aka "a j bank er".
Ajay Banga aka "a jew banker"...
One needs to be purchased to be back within God
a) God implies all needed for each wanting one within.
b) Purchase aka pur (forth) + chase (try to seize)...all puts forth need; each one within struggles with the temptation to seize wanted.
Pur (need) chase (want) implies a fiction if put together...being implies in-between, hence needing to resist want as RE (to respond) AL (all) ITY (entity).
c) Motion fronts and backs matter...matter resists both sides to remain matter. The backing represents the animation of matter; while the fronting represents the tempting of matter.
without redemption one still floats outside/(edit: without)
a) RE (reaction) DEEM (to take) TION (action)...reaction dooms itself by trying to redeem action. A moving process cannot be taken into possession by a moved potential.
If one chooses to let go of DEEM, then one can discern self as RE within TION. As long as one chooses to hold onto...possession clouds discernment.
b) Still implies motion silently moving through matter...stillness implies matter resisting the temptation to shape noise (words) within silence (sound).
c) Float/pleu - "to flow"...being implies formed (life) within flow (inception towards death). It's choosing to hold onto form (physical idols and mental ideals), which tempts form to feel like floating. Why? Because any burden makes it harder for form to resist drowning within flow.
d) Inside vs outside tempts one to ignore being in-between aka IN-SIGHT-OUT...all perceivable flows in and out of ones formed perception.
Creator as a creation
A deception to shape nihilism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo
God implies all...not anything more, but one and only singularity. Only within all can each one come into being by internal separation from one another, which implies transformation aka the transfer of form within action.
A jew exploits transformation by shaping form within flow; while tricking gentiles with creation to hold onto the shaped form as created by creator.
Christ makes us
Us (plural) contradicts Christ (to anoint each one from one another)...make/mag - "to be able" implies the separation from one another making it possible for one to ignore singular for plural.
One makes us by joining another in consensus to a suggestion aka a fictitious contract, while ignoring that Christ implies ones perception within all perceivable aka each ones anointed mind.
US puts matter together, which establishes friction...anointing (to christen) implies the lubrication to reduce friction. Seed (life) within soil (inception towards death) implies lubrication of matter within momentum of motion. Each seed in-between sOIL implies an anointed one aka a Christ, and the divide in-between implies Gods divination.
Who I am is within the Great I Am.
Within implies division of without aka process without dividing into potential within...I AM (jesus) implies potential taking possession over self, while becoming possessed by something greater than self aka YOU ARE (judah).
Only God gives and takes...any wanted possession held onto needs to be let go of. Infancy and elderly prevent the resistance required to hold onto tempting possessions. It's the developing mind in-between infancy and elderly, which grew enough resistance to waste it by holding onto tempting possessions like I AM...hence neither infant nor elder being able to answer who I am.
"For you were bought with a price. So glorify God in your body." ~1 Corinthians 6:20
- Price/pris/per - "to traffic in, to sell"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/price
To traffic in implies being (life) within transfer towards (inception towards death)...that's the glory of God moving through ones body and mind.
A being doesn't traffic (buy and sell) with God, but within God, hence being transference...free to choose.
I'm sold out
a) Selling out implies ones denial of being within.
b) I AM implies holding onto; SOLD OUT implies giving away...a synthesis of both implies a contradiction.
c) Both holding onto and giving away tempts one to ignore that all God given cannot be held onto or given away by anyone within, since the separation of all into each one requires transference of matter by motion.
d) I AM (jesus) contradicts oneness, because it establishes a YOU ARE (judah)...only CHRIST (anointed one) doesn't contradict oneness, hence anointing each one from one another.
a) Acceptance vs denial implies an artificial conflict...nature moves through each being, which doesn't require acceptance, nor yield to denial.
b) Acceptance or denial confine free will of choice if either side is chosen.
c) If being (life) accepts nature (inception towards death), then life dies faster...vice versa with denial.
d) Acceptance or denial is only among beings, hence tricking free will of choice to accept or deny artifice, while ignoring nature.
e) Rejection implies ones response (life) to being ejected (inception towards death) hence transferred from inception through life and towards death.
d) Being implies brought forwards by nature having ones back...life cannot choose to bring anything back without ignoring that only nature BRINGS (life) BACKS (inception) and FRONTS (death).
e) Being implies free; bought implies for a price. Others suggest a price to tempt being to freely sell self out.
the turning can be turned back around
If one turns within a circle...one moves in circles. A circle (logic) represents confinement, which prevents one from thinking straight.
How to get out of a circle? By choosing to let go of BOTH sides. Inception and death aren't two sides of life, but one linear process for each living potential.
In short...implication (if/then) over reason (vs).
The process of dying speaks to a loss of innocence
a) The process of dying implies silence...it's the living who choose to make noise by articulating speech.
b) Loss (inception towards death) of innocence (life) implies the status quo of being. Others turn this linear process into a versus conflict aka innocence vs guilt.
Naturally immortal beings cast into death by their free will of choosing incorrectly.
a) Naturally aka "all nature" and immortal aka within (im) dying (mort) all (al) once again implies the status quo of being. It's the artificial suggestion of immortality as "not dying", which distracts life from being within the natural process of dying.
b) Cast/kasta - "to throw" implies being (life) thrown (inception towards death). Few casts spells to tempt many to throw the dice (die) again and again and again aka gambling life away.
c) Correct vs incorrect implies turning against one another, while ignoring rect/regere - "to lead straight"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/correct
Life can be redeemed even through death though.
a) Death implies a suggested outcome, which one cannot perceive aka a temptation to turn away from natural towards artificial.
Being implies moving through (life) the process of dying (inception towards death)...which one can perceive momentarily.
b) To redeem implies "to buy back"...being implies given "free" will of choice. Buying and selling abandons free will of choice.
It would be helpful to just delete that line
Done.
or come up with a different example or different wording
Soon...
Suggestion of questioning vs statement of perceived threat.
a) Construing isn't perceiving. To perceive implies analysis (taking apart), while construing implies synthesis (putting together).
The foundation of any manipulation is about distracting from natural analysis (perception) by artificial synthesis (suggestion).
b) The VERSUS (verto; to turn) happens only after construing was applied to ones perception. Nature moves linear...holding onto anything turns a being from natural to artificial, and thereby against one another.
Where do you find humanity...
The HU in human implies hue (color) aka the visible spectrum of light with light implying the foundation one can find by enlightenment aka by self discernment.
Where does one find anything? Within the foundation.
Where do you find humanity is...
Foundation WAS before humanity comes into being. Suggesting to one another what it IS distracts from the foundation.
naturally born innocent
Naturally implies all nature; born implies each one born within all of nature; innocent implies being within (in) death (nocent/nocere/nek)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/innocent
Life can only be born within the process of dying.
This can be construed...
Con (together) struere (to pile up)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/construe
Directly before the example "kill yourself" I wrote: "Which suggestion has free-will-of-choice made without ripping apart the process of suggesting?"
If others pile together (construe) what one rips apart...how isn't that a conspiracy?
Anyway...would you like me to delete c) ?
The spread of Christianity
Christ (to anoint) spreads...Christianity contracts.
to make people weak
People (plural) makes person (singular) weak...if joined.
naive
Naive/naif - "natural; just born; innocent; genuine" implies being a native of nature aka the status quo of being.
Why did you say that?
Because free-will-of-choice
Why did free-will-of-choice answer?
Because free-will-of-choice chose to be questionable...
Work implies "to be in action or motion", hence its action which moves a being forward...Trump/triumph - "to prevail" implies having power by being moved forwards.
A jew plays the trump card to disempower gentiles by tricking them to submit to a deck stacked against them. What each gentile ignores...playing a game stacks the power of gentiles against one another.
Beast implies "being astute" aka discerning; while harlot implies "of no fixed occupation". Fixing onto any suggestion turns one away from discernment by perception...which only free will of choice can turn away from by thinking straight.