Two
There can be only one. One nature (all perceivable) for each unit of being (ones perception) within...two implies suggested dualism tempting one to ignore singularity.
First
Natural > essential > artificial...
AI makes everything
Everything natural > each essential thing > some artificial things made...
books
Nature doesn't write...nature delineates (inception towards death) being (life).
what does it matter if your generated content is unvaluable?
Only motion (value) generates matter (evaluation)...evaluating any content by another "unvalues" self aka "Judge not, that ye be not judged" from Matthew 7:1.
due to people not noticing it's not written by a human.
If nature doesn't write; then whatever humans write implies "artifice". Guess how few humans will ever notice that?
anything you say can and will be used against you
Because saying implies the articulating of words within natural sound, hence ones will turning against nature when saying anything.
Everything is being stored
Everything (cause) moves each thing (effect) apart from one another...it's few who tempt many to store suggested information within mind/memory, while ignoring that perceivable inspiration cannot be stored...only drawn from/within.
Destroying and conquering through peace
DE (to divide) + CON (to unite) through peace/piece aka artificial uniting naturally divided pieces aka few apart temping many together.
It's not divide and conquer, but conquering divide.
fall of rome
Fall (inception towards death) allows rise (life) to rome/roam (wander).
Sleight of hand: "They call me the wanderer...I roam around, around, around" and this one... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wanderer_(Old_English_poem)
thine enemy
En-e-my (within me).
in the midst
Ones choice in the midst of all balance can be inverted by consenting to a chosen ones suggested media/medius/middle.
thy people shall be willing in the day of thy power
Aka the will of a people within a consensus empowering thy suggestion.
Holiness from the womb of the morning
Aka holiness (motion) from the womb (momentum) of the morning (matter)...
he shall drink of the brook in the way; therefore shall he lift up the head
Aka lifting up ones formed perception by drinking from the brook/broc (flowing stream) of all perceivable.
order of Melchizedek
Order implies "to ordain; appoint" aka the natural order using inception to ordain each living being towards point of death.
Melchizedek from Hebrew Malki-tzedeq (king of righteousness) aka king/kin (give birth) of right/reg (to move in a straight line) aka king (life) of righteousness (inception towards death).
a priest for ever after
Priest/presby/per (forward) + after/aft (from behind) aka nature forwarding (death) being (life) from behind (inception).
jewish Holy book
A jew writes books to distract gentiles from discerning self to be divine partials within holy whole. Meanwhile...torah/horah (he thought) + talmud/lamadh (he learned) imply whole allowing each partial to learn to teach and teach to learn oneself.
the host they are embedded in
Hence crypto (hidden) jew (phonetic you). The origin of you implies me aka en-e-my (within me). If i am (jesus) then you are (judah)...
It's hard to fathom how generation after generation
Because it ain't generation after generation, but "generation aft" (from behind) aka action (inception towards death) generating being (life) from behind.
Fathom implies "to embrace, surround, envelop" which happens to a gentiles mind if holding onto a jewish idea like "generation after generation".
official name
Office/opus/op - "to work" implies all of nature employing each being within, hence offic-i-al (work within all).
Neither can there be any office within nature; nor does attaching a name to a moving process work for employment.
islam
Aka submission aka yielding ONES CHOICE under a CHOSEN ONE.
serious parts of the event
Serious implies arranged (life) in sequence (inception towards death) aka a temporal particular within a moving whole...a jew suggests event aka "the con-sequence of" to put together (con) gentiles.
to diminish the seriousness of the rhetoric
Rhetoric tempts many to follow few orators while ignoring the seriousness of being (life) arranged in sequence (inception towards death), which when followed, destroys being.
basically what happened
Happenstance implies chance (substance); being implies choice (essence) within balance (base).
A jew shaping substance (chance) to distract essence (choice) from base (balance)...that's alchemy hidden within rhetoric from the mind of gentiles.
left-leaning
Choice implies in-between balance (left/right)...leaning to either side imbalances choice. A jew shapes logic (left OR right) to trick gentiles into reason (left VS right) aka into imbalancing each other by free will of choice.
I have never like...but a close friend wanted to
That's the sub (under) stance (to stand) aka you standing under peer pressure seeded by a jew among gentiles who had no idea whose friend or foe.
Scary Movie...humor
It's as above (humor); so below (horror) aka a parody of Scream, which itself was about jewish amusement concealed among horrified gentiles.
under oath
So until yom kippur nullifies it...
how both...could coordinate together.
Because dualism (both); pluralism (together) and collectivism (coordinate) represent distractions from natural singularity. Few simply utilize nature, while many get lost in artifice.
Basic suppositions
Base generates essence; essence adapts to base...it's suppositions which distract from that.
Flat Earth is a decoy
A suggested label like "flat earth" puts ones perception into a cage (coy) while distracting from natural division (de).
NASA is fully controlled
Nature implies full/fall for each rising being within...rolling (trol) together (con) represents the artificial deception (nasa/nashar).
If Both...move to obfuscate reality, what is that reality?
Anything within nature cannot move...only re-move aka respond to being moved by nature. Real implies ones response (re) to all (al) motion...not to the fake stuff others pretend to move around.
BOTH implies your consent to suggested dualism, which makes you a dualist, hence mentally (logic) and physically (reason) stuck within a dual duel (one vs one).
There can be only one god; one nature; one motion; one origin; one cause etc.
My best bet accounting
a) Betting implies gambling given choice by taking chance.
b) The use of "both" implies one counting another one as "two", which makes one accountable to an accountant.
NASA is the main conduit
Main/magh (to be able) con (together) duit (to lead). Nature leading (inception towards death) towards being (life) implies MAIN-DUIT...CON implies the deception (nasa/nashar) by another.
black budget
Budget implies "to blow; swell"...black represents ones ignorance, which others blow up with suggested information, which oneself holds onto by consent, hence establishing an artificial bubble being popped by natural animation.
turning space
Space/spatior (to wander)...few utilize suggestion to tempt ones consenting mind to wander/wonder within circular logic, while turning away from perceivable.
The earth is either just bigger, or, the shape calculations are purposefully flawed
Nature implies the flaw/flow; being implies the form shaped within it...calculations imply measurements taken into possession, while ignoring the natural flow shaping form into being.
Bigger vs smaller represents an artificial calculation within your mind, while you ignore that anything within nature can be shaped bigger or smaller. The trick is the temptation to hold onto the shape instead of shaping form within flow.
pole
Pole/pag - "to fasten; affix"...nature moves and cannot be affixed; each being within can be tempted to ignore that by mentally holding onto measurements. Ones ignorance becomes the pole others exploit to measure the circumference with the help of compass and square.
wages as a communist concept
One of the Canaanites who became renowned as a leading English economist, and still enjoys wide influence in the United States, was David Ricardo (1772-1823), the third son of Abraham Israel, who was a substantial member of the jewish community in Amsterdam. Israel emigrated to London with William III and later became one of the wealthiest members of the London Stock Exchange, where he worked closely with his fellow emigres. His son, David, became an intimate friend of Lord Nathan Mayer Rothschild, speculating heavily in government securities on advice of Rothschild. Together, they profited enormously from the financial coup resulting from early news about the outcome of the Battle of Waterloo. David Israel, now known as David Ricardo, began to write economic dicta intended to become the final word on how much the working class should be paid. He developed a formula which became known as "the subsistence wage," dictating that the worker should never receive more than the bare minimum needed for his subsistence. If his wages were to be increased, the government was charged to take care of it by promptly increasing his taxes (does this sound familiar to any Americans?).
The Canaanites in America developed a new twist with the withholding tax, which insured that the worker would never receive his wages in the first place; he would only receive a mutilated portion, from which the Canaanites had already deducted "their" portion. Ricardo's dictum, which also became known as "the iron law of wages," iron meaning that under no circumstances would the worker ever be the beneficiary of any outburst of generosity and be allowed even a small increase, when Rita Ricardo-Campbell, wife of the director of the Hoover Institution, and a direct descendant of David Ricardo, came to Washington as a key member of Reagan's staff, the Reagan anticommunist, humanitarian Revolution. She became Reagan's advisor on Social Security payments and pensions. Ricardo's economic theories on wages and labor had also been enthusiastically received by Karl Marx, who adopted them as the guidelines by which the slave workers of Soviet Russia are ruled today.
~Eustace Mullins - 'The Curse of Canaan'
Wage/wedd - "pledge, agreement, covenant" aka ones consent to any suggestion of another, which binds one into a revolution aka agreement vs disagreement. Waging drains living.
Any pledge/pleon/dlegh - "to engage oneself or become fixed" binds ones free will of choice.
Lucifer is the false lightbringer
a) Light implies the fall (inception towards death) bringing/carrying forth the rise (life)...putting luci + fer together; just like light + darkness or true + false prevents one from rising.
b) Light cannot bring forth anything false or true...only en (within) lighten (light) ment (mind). It's the enlightened mind which darkens self by holding onto measurements (false or true) taken, while ignoring all given.
Sophia is the false lightbringer
Taking sophia (knowledge) into possession darkens (ignorance) light (enlightenment).
Venus is the false lightbringer
- "Black as the dark night she was"
- "Got what no one else had"
- "Yeah, baby, she's got it"
- "Well, I'm your Venus"
- "And I'm your fire, at your desire"
It's ones desire to take (want) what is given (need) which darkens the light, while kindling the fire/ire within self.
the false god that carrying light
The real god implies light carrying...the false god implies oneself trying to carry light. Each chosen one inverts ones choice to make that inversion happen.
The suggested information one carries tempts one to ignore the perceivable inspiration which enlightens. The former has to be carried by consent; the latter can't be held onto only adapted to by free will of choice.
satan...saturn
Aka the deceiver (satan) sowing (sat) inversion (turn).
misrecognition
Aka mis (to miss) re (to react) cog (together) gnoscere (to perceive) tion (action). The trick...putting the cog into ones perceiving reaction tempts one to miss all action.
One cannot perceive together; only apart from one another. It's ones consent to any suggestion which puts together what all sets apart from one another.
pleroma (totality of divine powers)
Tot (death) al (all)...all divines/divides living (power of growth) and dying (power of loss) from one another. Putting tot+al together leaves alive out, while putting an "s" onto powers establishes a plurality within singularity.
misorientation
Notice orient (east) from oriri (to rise). The cain-anites suggested a com (together) pass (to transfer) to distract from east (inception) to west (death) generating north (living) within south (dying).
archons
Consenting to a suggestion establishes the arch from one to another.
the same theme
THEme aka THEos...the same god. Different words can only be written within the same sound, yet differences can be tempted together with likable theme-songs like: "where everybody knows your name, and our troubles are all the same". Cheers btw implies "frame of mind".
several... texts
All severs each one from one another...few suggest text/teks (to weave) to confine many within a consensus.
Luci-fer implies weaving together by text of what all severs.
the rulers generate illusions
Rule/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies the generating force (inception towards death) for each re-generating being (life) within. It's ones consent to suggested pluralism (rulers) which makes singularity (generation) illusive to ones perception.
A cain-anite doesn't generate...but distracts from generation by suggesting an "s" to rule. Consenting to it permits Cain to dis-Abel one.
appearances that mimic the higher world but lack its essence.
The mimicry (suggestion) of appearance (perception) requires the consent of essence/esse (to be).
Only within lack/loss (inception towards death) can essence grow (life)...falling for the mimicry of one another drains essence faster. Nobody can put anything into this world which wasn't already there...it's shaping which mimics transformation as creation.
Lucifer aka light (luci) carrying (fer)...light implies God; carrying implies the animation of being carried forth within light. Cain represents that which is shaped out of that which is carried forth within light.
God favoring Abel implies light enABELing, which Cain disABELs out of jealously aka wanting to hold onto that which attracts (favor).
Luci (light) fer (to carry) implies Abel...putting luci+fer together implies Cain.
God the one and only father enables (Abel) each ones free will of choice to disable (Cain) oneself. Abel and Cain aren't TWO brothers but each aspect of the ONE and only father. Two (dualism) represents a creation of the Cain-anites during the Pythagorean story.
All movies have a brainwash component.
Only all moves, which allows each one within to respond to being moved. A movie implies a "moving picture", while a picture implies a "captured moment"...responding to that tempts matter (life) to ignore the momentum (inception towards death) of motion.
The brainwash component refers to com (together) ponere (to place) aka holding onto a captured moment, while the momentum of nature washes through the brain of each being.
Motion liquefies any solid; movies solidify solids, which makes it harder to resist (living) liquefaction (dying).
Who watches movies? The audience/audentia/au (to perceive), yet watching a captured moment (picture) being artificially moved (movie) tempts perception to watch suggestion.
Since you mentioned Cain...Jean CA(u)IN of Noyons who formulated Calvanism changed his name from Cohen > Cauin > Calvin.
Another bit about Cain/coin/koin... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koin%C3%A9_language from koinos (common, public, shared, general, ordinary) which also implies a private language.
Edit: almost forgot...Cain from Hebrew Qayin - "created one" aka based on creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing).
The same people...
Nature implies same; being implies differentiated from one another by nature...people implies artificial likeness shaped by few tempting many together.
papal bloodline
The all-father (pap-al) only has one blood (life) line (inception towards death).
black nobility
To know (nob) all (el) or to absorb (black) all. All perceivable moves through each ones perception; suggested gets absorbed by one.
As above (nobel) so below (black)...free will of choice.
monster inc
Monster from the Latin monstrum (divine omen); from PIE moneie (to make think of, remind)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/monster
Using words to make others think and to shape mental confinement by remembrance thereof...that's what in-corp-oration is about aka using a dead language (words) to distract from what animates the living tongue (sound).
spiritually nullified or transferred through speech
Ignoring that which animates the living tongue (sound) by using a dead language (words) implies spiritual nullification by transference of speech...
When you move
One can only re-move aka respond to being (life) moved (inception towards death). There's a natural fluidity animating each beings solidification.
compress and flex
That implies ones choice in-between compressing (move together) and flexing (move apart).
generates a tiny electrical charge
What if nature represents the only generator charging (inception towards death) each elect (being)? What if responding to generation by electing choice implies re-generation? What choosing to hold onto a side (tiny or gigantic) prevents regeneration, while pressing both sides in conflict against each other?
piezoelectricity
Aka piezo (to press) + elect (choice). What if being given choice implies magnetic/magh - "to be able" aka towards (inception towards death) being (life) enabled?
What if nature charging being implies the enabling (magh) of choice (elect)? What if few suggest electromagnetism to distract many from that?
What if consenting by free will of choice to any suggested -ism, like electromagnetism, puts a being under PRESSURE? https://genius.com/Queen-and-david-bowie-under-pressure-lyrics
needs to build up
Only within loss (inception towards death) can one build (life). Loss implies need; growth implies want aka the want to hold onto (living) within the need to let go of (dying).
This process works through a highly efficient biological mechanism
a) Consenting to a suggested -ism (mechanism) implies possession, which tempts potential (life) to ignore process (inception towards death).
b) Process implies delineation (inception towards death) of potential (life)...logic implies circular thinking aka a mental confinement of potential which distracts from process.
the squeeze; the spark; the growth
What if it's spark (inception) > growth (life) > squeeze (death)? What if the ongoing process represents light, and each temporary potential a fiery particle (spark) within?
Is it heart or hearth (fireplace)? Is it really circulation by heart or delineation of hearth aka of hot (life) within cold (inception towards death)? What if temporal hot resisting ongoing cold implies a frequency aka Hz aka Hertz/herz (heart/hearth)?
there is a difference between the two
Differentiation can only exist within singularity..."two" implies suggested dualism tempting ones consent to artificially hold together what nature sets apart from one another.
Example..inception and death are not TWO, but ONE process for each ONE potential living within.
Revelation of the Method...Predictive Programming
- Revelation implies revealed (life) by action (inception towards death). Anything nature brings into being implies revelation.
- Method aka meta (to pursuit) hodos (way) implies the suggestion of an artificial outcome to distract ones perception from natural revelation.
- Predictive aka pre (before) dict (to show). All perceivable was shown to each perceiving being before any suggestion can be shown to one another.
- Programming aka pro (forward) gram (to write). Nature forwards each being before a being can shape writing to describe nature to one another.
As for the differences...revelation implies natural origin; method implies an artificial outcome, so nature was revealing before any method can be "revealed" by any being. It's about tricking one to ignore the natural revelation for the artificial reveal by method of anything one ignores.
It's consenting to the suggested method which represents the program written into self, which permits another to predict the natural revelation one ignores.
method serves
Few suggest methods to tempt many into a consensus by giving individual consent to serve another. A method doesn't serve...it's being carried by anyone preserving it by consent.
this way shaping our perceptions and, more disturbing, our acceptance of them
There's only one way (inception towards death) within which perception (life) can be shaped...the way which moves forwards no matter if perception is disturbed by acceptance or denial of suggestion.
There is a sibling to this called Revelation of the Method
Sibling/sibja/swe - "self" implies nature diving fe-male within male from one another to allow inter-course with one another for off-spring from one another, which is how SELF sustenance requires perpetuation through one another.
The self implies the process of revelation...others suggest methods to tempt ones consent into taking possession. Process implies giving; possess implies taking...a contradiction.
esoteric concept
Nature implies exo (outer); being implies eso (inner)...teric/téreó - "to keep" implies inner potential ignoring outer process by keeping within possession.
Inner (perception) ignores outer (perception) when holding (consent) onto (suggestion)...the latter consent to any suggestion represents the shaping of a con (together) cept (to take).
Nature doesn't conceptualize...nature visualizes by divided each visible being from one another.
reveal their hidden agendas
Agenda/agent/action implies enacting nature revealing each re-acting being. Nature only reveals...it's a being who hides from nature by consenting to any suggested agendas by another.
There's nothing hidden from free will of choice...it's ones free will of choice to hide from revelation by seeking explanation from one another.
ritualistic purpose
Ritual/rite/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies nature putting forwards (pur) the position (pose) of each being by dividing each from one another.
Few draw circles inside (logic) and outside (reason) of many to distract from the one and only rite of passage (inception towards death) for each passenger (life) within.
Natural delineation implies purpose; artificial circulation implies aimlessness.
by forcing the public
Nature implies the force which privatizes each being from one another...few shape a consensus called "public" by tempting many to hold onto one another, thereby ignoring the natural force which empowers the being to be able to hold onto one another.
Law Enforcement implies natural law forcing mind into being... which one ignores when mentally and physically following suggested laws by another. Asking any law enforcement officer why the use of force gets the answer: "I'm just following orders".
when you pour it out more is there
Only within pour (inception towards death) can a pore (life) come into being by delineation...more vs less or love vs hate (circular conflict) represents an artificial vessel (looking glass) which the ongoing pour shatters sooner or later.
think in this way
Way implies forward motion, which one ignores when holding onto a side within a circle (love vs hate).
what is love?
"Oh, baby, don't hurt me" by HAD-DA-WAY (head the way)... https://genius.com/Haddaway-what-is-love-lyrics
One cannot love without getting hurt by hate, and it's baby (babylon aka confusion; disorder) spread by babel (articulation of words within sound) which binds both sides against each other if consented to either.
Being in bed with Big Tech is a bigger deal than being in bed with Israel imo
The bed implies the mind of many. Big Tech; Big Pharma; Big Sugar etc. represents the blanket suggested by few to confine the minds of many into slumber. Consenting to any suggestion represents the deal putting ones perception to sleep.
Israel aka yisra'el "he that striveth with God" implies ones perception (christ) struggling with the suggestions of another (anti-christ) within all perceivable (god).
- Natural order (forward motion) > arrangement of being (apart from one another) > alphabet (rearrangement of being)
a) Natural order arranging the mind of each being apart from one another implies an analytical process...beings rearranging minds by following alphabetical order implies a synthetic product.
b) Within the natural order arrange implies "set in a row aka into a more or less straight line". Within the alphabetical order arrange/range becomes hringaz/ring - "a circle"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/arrange
Why a circle? Because if an arranged mind (life) within a straight line (inception towards death) holds onto any letter/leta - "to allow; to leave behind, depart from"; then one moves equidistant from the center aka in a CIRCumference.
Allowing another binds ones free will of choice. Consenting to any suggestion of another leaves self behind. Departing from implies ones mind ignoring to be a divided (de) part within.
c) Alphabet aka alpha/aleph/eleph (ox) + beta/beth/bet (pledge as a forfeit to another)... that's how ones choice is being tricked to pledge self domestication to a chosen one.
Edit: OED (Oxford English Dictionary) aka ox + ford/furdu/prtu/per (to lead; pass over)... that's how the Bauer farms by leading the oxen to pass over the field.
2nd Edit: What's the stick called for driving oxen? GAD (phonetic god)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/gad
mount of olives
- Olive/oliva/elaia/ewi - "oil"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/olive
The mount of olives implies each annointed one rising up (mount) out of all (oil).
fault-line underneath the mount of olives
Aka the fault-line (inception towards death) for each anointed one (life) rising up within.
what they hoped to achieve specifically is almost totally unknown to me.
a) Achieve from Vulgar Latin accapare, from Late Latin ad caput - "to come to a head"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/achieve
Tempting many to specify suggested information within their heads permits few to shape hope and fear within the mental archive.
b) If you write "unknown to me"; then "me" implies your hope to hold self in possession or the fear to lose self...knowledge cannot be possessed. Knowledge implies a process (cause) moving through potential (effect).
c) Using suggestion to tempt perception into ignorance represents witchcraft aka another "crafting which" one chooses.
They love signalling their superiority
It's consenting to any suggested signal/signum (identifying mark) which makes oneself inferior to another.
it goes way beyond
Nature implies the only way for each being within...few suggest "yonder" (at a distance) to distract many from being within way.
things like governments/corporations
The same nature differentiates each thing within...it's consenting to hold onto suggested government (control of ming) + corporation (corpos oration) which establishes a like-minded consensus.
It's not the governments or corporations which are working together...its the consensus among many who invest their minds into artificial constructs, which are holding together what nature works apart.
nationalist
Nat-ion-al (native within action of all) implies the status quo of being within nature. An -ist (nationalist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ism (nationalism) by another into a consensus of many under few.
governments spending so out of control
Govern (to control) ments (minds) implies each invested being within, which tricks each being to spend (to pay out or away, deprive oneself of).
to cause hyperinflation
TO (towards) implies the cause of in (within) flat (to swell) ion (action) aka of each swell (life) within action (inception towards death).
Few suggest artificial excess (hyper) to invert natural adequacy within the minds of many, hence tempting each with the ideology that nature isn't enough.
being forced on the masses
Nature implies force dividing being...few tempt the consent of each divided being into a mass-consensus, which nature continues to force apart.
Joining a mass implies self sacrifice (consent) and mutual destruction (consensus). Whenever a mass gets destroyed... only a (((fraction))) remains. Let's call that fractional reserve banking.
governments creating
Ones mind consenting to suggested creationism is what establishes mind (ment) control (govern).
two tier justice
There can be only one (cause) for each one (effect) within...it's ones consent to another ones suggestion, which establishes two tier justice (affect).
goes out of its way
Being implies the transference of essence (life) in (inception) and out (death) of way of motion. Few utilize suggestion to tempt the mind of many to wander off the one and only way of life.
Whites have no right
White implies "pure light"; right/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies light > spectrum > ray...that's the right/rite of passage for each ray within the visible spectrum of all light.
corporations only hiring browns and blacks...
...while destroying the corporations from within. Jeff Bezos: "I predict one day Amazon will fail".
surveillance systems
System aka sy (together) stem (to stand)...standing together within a consensus permits anyone apart to watch (veil) over (sur) one.
those are your choices
There can be only one aka each ones free will of choice. Another suggests pluralism (choices) to trick singular (choice) to ignore self (ones choice) for another (chosen one). That's an inversion.
Primary (balance) > secondary (choice) > optional (choices)...
Same thing (sound), but in different terms (words)...unless this is being addressed at the core; those who craft spells and those who fall for them continue the predator vs the people circle.
Neither are there any discoveries or new insights within any book, nor does history require any esteem or respect.