1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

The circular financing, the lack of product

Gentile investment into jewish AI establishes an inward (logic) and outward (reason) circle distracting from the natural line of progress aka product/producere - "bring forth".

There's no lack of product within nature since nature cannot stop to produce...it's ones mind confined to an artificial circle which fails to re-produce.

Consumer AI is designed to fail

a) Nature implies fall/fail generating rise...AI inverts hindsight with designs of foresight aka suggested outcomes to distract from perceivable origin.

The answers ones questions seek from AI distract from the ongoing solution (inception towards death) to any problem (life) brought forwards within nature. Foresight implies looking forward; hindsight implies seeing (ones perception) what has happened (all perceivable) aka response to origin.

b) Consume aka summoned (sume) together (con) aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka artificially putting together (synthesis) what nature sets apart (analysis).

How does a gentile consume? By willingly consenting to the suggested product by a jew...in this case AI.

lack of government involvement

That which controls (govern) your mind (ment) is that which your mind (ment) turns (volve) within (in). Consenting to AI implies involvement with AI, which implies government by those producing AI.

The jewish INTELLIGENTSIA is based on gentile consent to ARTIFICE, while ignoring nature.

this entire house of cards is doomed to fail.

Entire implies fall (inception towards death); particular implies rise (life)...it's putting together houses of cards which distracts ones discernment (doom/doms) and attention (doom/domė) from it. ~ https://www.etymonline.com/word/doom

The only question

There can be only solution (inception towards death) towards problem (life)...question vs answer represents a circular distraction from the natural line of progress.

The only question...The next question

That's the cancer growing within the mind of gentiles...a contradiction (only vs next) exponentially growing into a clusterfuck. How could a mind get out of this circle while "only" is being ignored for "next"?

government bailout

Gentiles represent the minds governed by artifice suggested by a jew, which in return represents the bailing (to release) out of form (life) within flow (inception towards death).

Inception implies the "bailing-in" of life; death implies the "bailing-out" of life...a jew suggests artifice to distract gentiles from nature which represents mind (ment) control (govern).

to bind the fate of the stockmarket

Gentiles represent the life "stock" of each jew; any jewish suggestion aiming at gentile consent represents the "market", and consent given to any suggestion represents the "binding" of gentile fate.

to force the government

A mind controlled (rolled into a circle) ignores the animating force of natural delineation.

The real worry is that they then take all

The suggestion that one within all can TAKE ALL...is fake. It's mosaic (puzzle) law aka making whole by fitting pieces together. It's a jew tempting gentiles to play fake puzzle with reality itself.

feeding that into the system

Sys (together) stem (to stand) implies gentiles standing together by under-standing jewish suggestions like artificial intelligence/inteligo (to understand). Within such a system... participants represent the fodder, like for example users of the world wide web are representing the fodder for the crawler who spun the web.

a powerful citizen prediction model

Ignoring reality (perception) for fiction (suggestion)...that's the most powerful citizen prediction model, because reality moves forwards, while fiction tempts those within reality to burden self by holding onto.

Among gentiles holding onto artifice..each jew represents a data-center aka the centralized control of any artificial data given to gentiles.

the Rehoboam

The most advanced AI isn't AI, but reality advancing forwards, which most within ignore for artifice.

pure theory

Speculation (theory) cannot be pure since it implies a division of SPEC (particular) and ATION (whole)...whole implies pure; particular implies impure.

Only within a purification process (inception towards death) can potential impurity (life) come into being.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

accusation

ACCUSE (a cause)...there can be only one cause (perceivable) for each effect (perception) within. Accusation by suggestion implies ACCURSE (a curse) which evokes excommunication aka cutting one off from the community with others.

Coming into being within accusation implies by excommunication aka by division from one another. Democratic politics is about managing the strength (cratic) of the community (demo) by excommunicating anyone who doesn't fit in.

CURSIVE can only be written by EFFECT within CAUSE...AFFECT to another tempts effect to ignore cause, while getting cursed.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Quantum physics.... no one gets it

a) Quantum/quant (sum)... natural physic implies differentiation from one another; artificial physicism tempts one to ignore that by summoning differences together.

b) That (motion) which differentiates (matter)...one cannot get aka take physical possession of, while being physically dispersed within it.

Aether with spirit torn from it, with being torn from it

Aether > spirit > essence (being) aka motion > momentum > matter...it's the division of motion through momentum which represents the torn apart (inception towards death) matter (life).

Aeather/aithēr/aidh - "to burn" implies towards the burned offering aka motion animating the spark of life within matter.

it will never ever be "intuitively understood".

a) Never contradicting ever is based on ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything perceivable, when consenting to any suggestion of another.

b) Understanding implies submission (standing-under)...not intuition (insight aka sight within).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

it starts 300k years ago in a place scientists didn't even know

Sleight of hand right there...science/scio (to know; to perceive) implies each ones perception right now; not any suggestion about 300k years before or after.

One cannot perceive (science) 300k years, but one can effortlessly utilize suggestion to tempt another into being held accountable to numbers.

it starts

Only within all light does spectrum offer each ray/race (life) a start (life) and finish (death)...neither of which one can perceive from in-between.

mapped

To map implies "drawing upon a plane surface representing a part or whole of the earth's surface or the heavens, with the various points drawn in proportion and in corresponding positions"...doing so draws together each race light divides apart from one another.

Race implies the sentience (sentence) of each...not points (end of sentence) drawn among many.

Samuel George Morton

Monogenism vs polygenism...it ain't a conflict unless one chooses a side. Light (mono) > spectrum (poly) > ray/race (transfer of mono through poly).

Hidden Origins

There can be only one origin which reveals everything (perceivable) through each thing (perception)... it's the suggestions from one another which tempt ones perception into hiding.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

God must be so mad.

Mad implies dis-ordered aka divided within Gods order or in-sane aka within Gods sound. God cannot become mad...only anyone coming into being within God can become mad.

Sleight of hand for madness: "I'm mad as hell and I'm not gonna TAKE this anymore". Taking what is God given shapes madness.

chickens

God supplies all to each...many ignore this by permitting few to supply the demand of many. That's the origin of mass murder.

To amass implies "heaping up for oneself"...that's how each chosen one amasses gentiles. Mass graves will continue until each gentile resists the temptation to join a mass/mess.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Problem implies solution...only during a solution can each problem be thrown forwards. Nature doesn't hide anything...it dissolves (inception towards death) each problem (life).

drug companies hide behind shell companies so you can't sue

Ones consent to suggested drug (to dry); company (to feed together) and suing (to follow) represents the artificial shell oneself builds to hide from nature.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have you been initiated?

Inception represents the initiation of life into the process of dying aka the beginning of each beings natural rite of passage.

Joining any fraternal alliance obscures ones discernment against (contra) inception aka birth-control. This is why many so called initiations suggest a second birth; rebirth; born anew; revival; resurrection; resurgence; reincarnation; rejuvenescence; return; awakening etc.

In short...Initial aka ALL and each one IN IT.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

destroying the middle class

Few suggest classism to establish class-consciousness among many, which destroys them, because the middle (life) of nature (inception towards death) has to be free from one another to build (living) during destruction (dying).

poor people

Poverty aka artificial destitution implies ones ignorance of natural prosperity. All of nature (perceivable) is offered to each native (perception)...that's prosperity. Destitution is based on ones consent to the suggestion of another aka banksters banking trust.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are lazy people now a conspiracy?

To sustain laissez-faire capitalism at the top requires lazy debtors at the bottom, and diligent drones in the middle.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

food supply

Food implies demand; hunger implies supply. Few artificially supply the demand to distract many from the natural supply demanding adaptation.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

"If you're into evil, you're a friend of mine...You got me ringin' Hell's bells" ~ https://genius.com/Ac-dc-hells-bells-lyrics

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Notice the video opening with saying that Jung studied various religious traditions such as "Christianity; Buddhism; Hinduism; Gnosticism"...yet deliberately leaving out the jewish influence. Later on, when circumambulation comes up, it's mentioned that the jewish rite of sacrifice is based on encircling the victim, adding Jung's quote: "There's no linear evolution; there's only circumambulation"

Now let's look at Jung's profession as analytical psychologist...PSYCHO (aka psyche; animating power) implies a linear process; which by animating establishes analysis (a setting apart). It's LOGY (aka logic; circular thinking) which represents the evolution within a linear process aka a synthesis (putting together) by circumambulation.

In short...few tempting many to ignore "psycho" for "logy" establishes the circumambulation (circular movement) within gentiles for the jewish rite of sacrifice.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bell/bhel - "sound"...not the words articulated within natural sound by a forked tongued reptile who creeps among a lower frequency to avoid detection.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

post-death revelation story

The process of dying (inception towards death) represents the revelation of living aka of the potential to grow during loss. Stories are told to burden the one storing them within memory, which makes growing harder.

The struggle to grow represents odyssey; the self inflicted burden represents the underworld.

bardos

Post as in "after" tempts one to ignore post/por - "forth" aka the process of dying putting forth each one living within, thereby implying an intermediate state of essential (life) transference (inception towards death).

standard

Few suggest stories to tempt many to store them within memory, thereby enforcing a standard aka a stationary position as the inversion of ones mobile position.

Nature moves being...beings suggest standards to one another to distract from motion.

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jung

Shabbos goy to Freud and Bleuler.

What if the clarity you were searching for is waiting on the other side of getting completely loss?

Light gives clarity by moving forwards, within which each ray comes into being. Searching forwards for clarity tempts one to ignore origin for outcome, thereby obscuring ones sight in-between competing sides.

As for completion aka com (together) plet (to fill) ion (action)...action (inception towards death) drains reaction (life) which allows growth within loss.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

white race

RACE, noun (Latin radix and radius having the same original. This word coincides in origin with rod, ray, radiate, etc.)... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/race

White implies pure light; black the absence of light...being implies a ray within the visible spectrum (color) of light aka in-between white and black aka having the free will of choice to purify (discern) or contaminate (ignore) oneself.

A jew suggests race-ism to shape a consensus out of joining gentiles, which by joining contaminate purification.

A race isn't a group but each ray within the visible spectrum of light, and white and black aren't colors to identify as but the opportunity for each ray to lighten or darken self.

where were the whites in the bible?

White pages besmirched by black writing...both concealing the reader in-between covers.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Christopher Nolan's Odyssey

Odysseus's descent into the underworld aka Hades; from hadein (invisible); from weid (to see)...what is it that makes all perceivable invisible to the sight of ones perception?

Ones willing consent to the suggestion of another; especially if directed by nolan/nolle (be unwilling) while being carried (pher) across (christo).

a trans girl, two black women, an Indian guy and a Syrian jew.

These represent space/spatior (to wander) making your mind wander/wonder about the suggestions of another, while on your space-travel odyssey (discernment) to hades (perception) as Christo (across) pher (to carry) Nolan (be unwilling)...an odyssey directed by ones free will of choice through Ulysses (discernment) and his best friend Nono (ignorance).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N50XnT9206w

How does one kill the giant cyclops (all seeing eye)? Why does Tele (over a distance) machus (battle; to fight) require rescue? What does traveling among unknown stars imply? Bodies as lifeless as stone (((stein)))? The way back to earth wiped from memory?

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

that lasted hundreds of millions years until unknown event

As if anything lasting hundreds of millions of years could be known...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

air conditioning is unnatural

Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies the division of each one within all from one another...condition implies one subjecting self to another by means of stipulation (contract).

The contract for air-conditioning implies the house/haus - "hide"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/house aka hiding from natural air, while artificially mimicking it with air conditioning. The more one stays hidden; the less of natural revelation one receives.

Nature reveals all (perceivable) through each one (perception)...few utilize suggestion to tempt many into hiding from revelation. Ones consent to any suggestion of another represents the stipulation (contract) establishing the condition.

Ask yourself a) What's the house of God? and b) What's the nectar of God?

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nature divides each being from one another thereby putting each at ease; few tempt many together to shape symptoms for disease. Proximity shapes ease into disease.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Einstein's unified field theory

"In physics, a unified field theory is a type of field theory that allows all fundamental forces of nature, including gravity, and all elementary particles TO BE WRITTEN in terms of a single physical field."...only within a singular line of motion; can matter write any plural conception (theory).

One cannot unify an open field by enclosing it into a plural theory without binding oneself (singular) to another (plural). The written has to be shared by contract aka consent (reader) towards suggestion (writer) aka buying vs selling. That's not natural...it's a fictitious scheme.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

concave. Inside the egg.

Egg implies the body (matter) formed in the females (momentum) of all animals (motion)...using the word con (together) cave (to swell) tempts one to ignore that motion sets matter apart from one another. Few tempting many together represents the con-cave deception.

As for the conflict in-between concave (incurved) vs convex (outcurved)...only within a flowing line can a curve come in (inception) and out (death) of form (life).

Freeing oneself from the deception of con (together) cave (to swell) implies "scrambling egg" aka scramble; verb - "make one's way by clambering, struggle or wriggle along," also "strive with others or jostle and grasp rudely for a share or for mastery"

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting then...

Interest/interresse (to make a difference) from INTER (internal; within; in the midst of) ESSE (essence; to be)...that's how God derives being aka if God; then internal essence.

God, who Creates

Create/ker - "to grow". Only the created can grow (life) within the loss (inception towards death) provided by God making a difference.

If God could grow; then that would imply into more than god, which contradicts EL > ALL. All has to divide first to allow (all low) each one within to grow. Growing also implies a secondary reaction...not a primary action.

Created the vibrations

TION (action) implies all of God...VIBRA (moving to and fro) implies each one within. Putting God outside of vibration ignores God (tion) internalizing (vibra) through vibration.

the sound the vibrations make

THE (theos; God) implies sound/sanus (whole; entire; all aka el). It's all sound acting (tion), which makes each instrument move to and fro (vibra)

the sound the vibrations make, perhaps by His Speaking

Sound > vibration > speech > noise...if you write that vibration makes sound; then you refer to acoustic/kous - "to hear" aka ones response within all sound after the division of tion into vibra.

God implies natural...speech implies articulation within natural, hence making noise within the sound of silence.

Since speech tempts one another to hold letters; words; meaning etc. together...natural vibration can be abused for artificial destruction aka rhythm like the rhymes of hip-hop by BUSTA Rhymes flipping the mode (flipmode) or the history which rhymes or the idiom "no rhyme; no reason" implying that reason equals rhythm, which is why conflicts of reason are being orchestrated into theaters of war.

Interesting...There is no in-between

The first sentence starts with essence (est) in-between (inter)...the next sentence contradicts it. Took you one sentence to shape a circle; girl...

There is no in between was and is

THERE implies a differentiation to HERE...one can only be in-between here and there.

the One outside

Only in-between IN (inception) and OUT (death) can ONE (life) choose a side.

He is always in Being

Aka all way (inception towards death) for each being (life) within. That's how he (motion) moving through she (momentum) generates off-spring (matter).

view more: Next ›