Fiedler. Not fiddler.
https://img.gvid.tv/i/GNaoC2ou.png
the information you attempt to co-opt.
Ones consent co-opts suggested information, which represents the temptation to ignore perceivable inspiration. Free will of choice draws from the ongoing flow of inspiration, while setting temporary information apart.
Holding onto information would contradict "free" will of choice, while inspiration cannot be held onto...
I didn't ask you to quickly peruse
David supplied the preface for the readers quick perusal...and the contradictions in that tell me that David respects those with eyes to see.
information is deeper than any 'words' can describe
Because the one consenting to stand-under (understand) suggested information is burying self as deep as it gets underneath the descriptions by another.
As for scribe/scriba - "teacher of jewish law"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/scribe That ain't natural; but artificial.
how/why words were created
First of all to sell gentiles on creationism (creatio ex nihilo; creation out of nothing); thereby tempting each ones discernment into mass de-nial of perceivable for suggestions by a chosen few.
As for how...by modulating natural sound into artificial words, and why..."because" aka tempting being to ignore cause for a "probable cause" aka a general purpose qualifier aka words to describe sound, which is how a jew teaches gentiles "mosaic" law.
The part can't contain the whole
a) Alone aka all(in)one aka "one for all and all for one" aka "there can be only one"
b) If all is one in energy; then each one within all implies energy.
c) The trick...con-tain-ment aka tempting ones mind (ment) to hold (tain) together (con). Nature offers all perceivable towards each ones perception for FREE will of choice. It's holding onto suggested information, while ignoring perceivable inspiration, which establishes containment, while permitting others access through entertainment.
you work backwards
a) Work implies energy (internal/inherent power)...being implies each ones em-ploy-ment within all of energy.
b) Forwards (inception towards death) implies backwards for each being living within. Inception implies flow to form; life implies form within flow; death implies form to flow.
The ongoing process of dying dissolves any being living in it, hence as above/so below.
Raise it up.
There's the IT again...one can only raise self by resisting the temptation of one another. Raising IT tempts others to hold onto it, while dragging it down.
IT implies suggested information, hence the Information Technology... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_technology
Techno/teks (to weave) + logy (logic/reason/logos) aka weaving together circular logic; turning into conflicts of reason, based on the suggested information others crafted into words to fill ones mind/memory.
That's what a jew does to their gentile goyim/golem... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLFRlsisrBM
You're lowering the conversation into a circular dualism
a) CON (together) VERS (to turn)...there's your circular dualism.
b) Free will of choice reacts to ION (action), which implies a linear progression.
c) There's no conflict between high vs low within action...only within the circular logic of each reaction, when turning against each other (reason), while ignoring action.
De-fine-ing the point
A point implies the end (death) of a sentence (life)...defining implies affixing a point (death); thereby ignoring sentence (life) and corrupting SENTIENCE.
What happens if one makes a point during motion? One draws a line...thereby contradicting the point. Which is how gematria works...tricking one (1) to affix origin (0), while measuring towards outcome (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0). It doesn't matter how many zeros one puts before or behind measurements...it's ones mind which holds onto the measurements.
How does a jew hide numbers? By slapping words upon them, which gentiles mentally affix aka define as DEFINITIONS, hence making themselves into DEAF PHONETICIANS.
Gematria of "energy"? 74 aka 11 aka ONE (partial) within ONEness (whole).
What does ordinal imply? Order within all...for each one within.
Read the thing and understand instead.
Does nature offer anything one needs to read and understand? What does "instead" imply when applied to the one and only nature? Do you really think that putting your mind in-between (book) covers will set you free?
One can hardly 'remain free' if one has never been not-free
Remain aka re-sponding (life) to main (inception towards death)...not implies ones de-nial thereof. Main implies the application of force aka the dominance (action) setting one free (reaction).
Being freed implies lack of effective resistance in the past
a) Being implies resistance (life) freed within velocity (inception towards death).
b) When you say "lack" then you ignore "loss" aka being growth (life) within loss (inception towards death)...loss offers the foundation for each being to grow within.
c) "In the past" isn't a position one can be in, but represents the denial of ones presence right now for what was (past) or will be (future).
One (life) cannot perceive past (inception) or future (death)...others suggest it to manipulate ones memory, while distracting ones presence.
the same decides
Only ones free will of choice decides, and being one implies differentiated from one another. Meanwhile...different choices can only be formed within the same balanced flow.
Strange that the same decides to become free from 'letting' others who don't resist the knowledge, spell out the letters for them.
Letting another binds one, hence becoming "spell-bound". Knowledge continues to move through one, while ones perception thereof is bound to suggested spells.
Those who try to "spell out" those who are spell-bound are trying to loosen up the bondage by taking apart what other spell-craft together.
begging the question
Both begging and questioning aims forwards, while trying to reach charity and answers in return.
Nature doesn't turn...it causes effects by forcing velocity (inception towards death) through resistance (life).
'Deception' is a perception by one who has been deceived
Before one can be deceived by another, there's de (division) cept (to take) ion (action). Being implies division (perception) within action (perceivable)...taking from another (suggestion) is the issue.
Also; there can be no such thing as a "has been"...unless one ignores being.
to only apply to others when denied in one's own opinion
While applying matter onto matter; one denies motion separating matter from matter. That's the physical issue...mentally, it's opinions held within matter, mentally applied to other matter, while mentally ignoring physical motion, which fucks one up.
Notice opinion/option aka ones free will of choice...not what one chooses to hold onto or apply onto others, but the choice itself.
It's a moot subject to attempt to apply to gematria.
Moot/mod - "to meet; assemble"...that's the wanted temptation one needs to resist. Gematria implies measurements applied to ones mind...
you start from the wrong end
Can life do that, while being moved from inception towards death by nature?
Ideation is what you attempt to bring
ION (action) is what brings reactions into being...ideas/ideal/idols are suggested by other beings to tempt one to ignore reacting to action.
All brings each one...whatever one brings with implies a self imposed burden.
Do I disagree with your summations? About half. Half not.
If one agrees vs disagrees about suggested summation, then one ignores being a fraction (perception) within whole (perceivable).
What is half of energy if all is one in energy?
Notice the upvote vs downvote option next to our comments...those represent the agree vs disagree conflict of reason, and then notice that each one has the free will of choice to resist the temptation of choosing a side within an artificial conflict.
So I haven't downdooted. Yet.
The temptation never lets up...it's ones resistance to it which can be fertilized.
you spank often when needed
90% of comments I get are abusive towards me (seldom about what I wrote tho)...I ain't the one spanking.
The purpose you serve here is to divide
a) Notice that reason implies a conflict against one another, hence versus/verto - "to turn". One can only turn against one another, if one was divided from one another beforehand.
Nature divines/divides beings from one another...
b) Neither do I purpose (put forward), hence only ever commenting after others, nor do I serve division, but resist (life) division (inception towards death).
The issue is that others believe that division is bad, and unification good, hence falling for mosaic law (puzzling the pieces into a whole) aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) etc.
The unwashed MASSES are feeling offended when one (singular) tries to divide them apart from one another. Meanwhile, those masses are governed by each chosen one aka a people apart aka rules for thee, but not for me aka sovereign within commonwealth aka one who erects at center, while circumcising the circumference etc.
Lucifer' is said to go 'to and fro
Lucifer aka bringing forth light, which generates a visible spectrum of light for each ray within. Spectrum implies balance; ray implies choice balancing, hence alternating to and fro.
The issue..."lucifer" doesn't say anything aka doesn't modulate letters together into words...light (motion) separates rays (matter) within a spectrum (momentum).
Ask yourself...who said that lucifer said? Who is shaping suggestions in the name of?
truths of all kinds
Kind/kindred/kin implies relations among different ones within all. Such a relation is established by ones consent to the suggestion of another from either side...truth or false.
All moves...each ones perception ignores that all perceivable moves, when holding onto true or false suggestions.
one is the shadow of the other
Hence ones casting shadows upon other ones, while within all light. If one resists others, then light (discernment) and dark (ignorance) are moving through one....otherwise the shadows of ignorance are spreading, while obfuscating self discernment.
words are shadows of ideation which are seperated 'sephira' of the whole
a) Words become shadows by ones free will of choice "letting" them. Without ones consenting choice...nothing holds the words together.
Sound moves light through...words represent the modulation of sound tempting one to hold onto, hence dimming self with ignorance.
b) Sephira/sophia aka divine (momentum) wis (matter) dom (motion)...one has to wise up to being free will of choice within divine dominance aka free within dom.
ALL needs to be investigated
Notice VEST + GATE...all separates each one from one another in the nude, while passing through.
Gematria is a system to understand the concepts
One doesn't need to measure (matria) generation (ge). One does not need to stand (stem) together (sys). One does not need to stand-under another. One does not need to take (cept) together (con).
Want tempts one to ignore need tho...
it isn't the thing in itself.
Yet IT is held within one thing during the motion of everything.
Gematria implies holding onto numbers; systems are held within one to be applied to another; standing under implies holding ones position, and taking together implies holding together.
Holding onto IT destroys one. It implies anything but male or female. How could there be anything (matter) but male (motion) and fe-male (mo-mentum)? Well; simply by ones ignorance of male and female for IT....whatever others suggest IT may be.
If Godzilla won't come to Tokyo, how will he claim victory?
God + zilla/tsillah from root צֵל (tsel) - "shadow/shade"...it's the conflict within God about victory vs defeat, which casts shadows over each anointed one.
Godzilla represents the monstrous consequences of ignorance, hence monster/moneie/men - "to think"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/monster (notice moneie/money).
Get back AFTER not before
Let's do the preface: "This book throws light on some long-overlooked aspects of cosmology and symbolism"...
a) Light throws beings apart from one another...a book binds being to one another, while tempting each ones sight in-between covers.
b) Cosmos aka cosmetic...something applied outwards to cover (make up) what moves from within outwards. Logic implies circular thinking, being implies within linear progression.
c) Symbol implies thrown together aka suggested -ism throwing together consenting -ists.
d) To be able to overlook aspects requires aspects the choose to "stand-under" ones look/lock...
e) David Fideler aka fiddling (playing string instruments aka minds strung together) + david/davit (an oath aka ones consent to the suggestion of another).
f) If I already read H. P. Blavatsky - "The Secret Doctrine", then what else did David Fideler add to the mix?
Semantics divide while attempting to unite.
a) Unite/unit/unus aka one apart from one another...a division.
b) Semantic/sēma - "mark, token; omen, portent; constellation"...a combination.
Breaking semantics apart makes it harder for other ONEs to hold it together.
What happens when someone 'gets' what you attempt to say,
Each one (perception) GOT all (perceivable), while being tempted to GET (suggested) from others. Whatever one gets...will never be enough.
'solve' any question
A question tempts one to wait for an answer by another, while ignoring to be dis (life) solved (inception towards death) aka a division within a solution aka alchemical ingredient within a base.
Nature implies the ongoing solution to any temporary problem within...questions and answers tempt one to ignore that.
No question can ever be solved; because each beings inception brings up the question again.
point to the spirit
Spirit/spiro - "to breathe" moves through each sentient being, hence while life is being sentenced towards point of death.
what gematria is
Before generation (ge) can be measured (matria)...it was generating each being able to measure.
Hence gematria aka gemara representing the essential secondary part of talmud, while mishnah represents the substantial primary whole.
not the ridiculously simplistic off-the-mark definition you play
a) Like how "not" simply implies ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything when dividing ones perception with suggestion?
b) Definit (to affix) ion (action)...action acts upon reactions, and cannot be affixed. It's reactions reacting to one another to get a fix, who are ignoring action.
c) Only matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion can be marked...not motion.
for all your semantic pontificating
All forwards each one by division...pons (bridge) + fex (to make) implies artificial combination of natural division.
you don't even know how to 'spell' the words you parse
Crafting spells implies parsing partial letters together...free will of choice needs to resist LETTING others parse LETTERS together, as to remain free.
tl; dr...if gematria is your way to deal with deception, then how about a discussion about 0 and 2...both artificial states within natural singularity aka 1.
If energy implies 1; then what do 0 and 2 imply? Try proving 0 and 2 to another 1 without contradicting 1-self...
What if GE implies the one and only generator, and MATRIA each generated one within having the free will of choice to measure each other? Where is the contradiction in my line of thinking?
Con (together) + scious (ones perception)... a contradiction in terms to test ones mind.
There is none. It doesn’t exist.
What is the significance of nothing?
the significance of flat
A shape implies form within flow...few signify form to distract many from flow.
to change the perception of the masses
Perception aka per (by) capere (to take)...change cannot be taken. Ignoring this by taking suggested over perceivable "amasses" many under few.
the authority of the Bible
a) Author/aug - "to increase"...only flow increases (inception) and decreases (death) form (life).
b) It's readers who authorize writers, who in return tempts readers to not question the authority of the written.
c) Author/autor - "father"... what was that about not calling anyone father on earth?
the correct shape
Only change (flow) can sustain shapes (form) by internal separation of each shape from one another. Suggested correct aka com (together) + reg (to move in a straight line) inverts natural separation with artificial collectivism.
the origin of man is deliberately being covered up from us.
Perceivable implies origin of perception...suggested tempts one to cover up self by consent.
Change (perceivable) generating shape (perception) implies a separation of all into each one...few suggest pluralism (us) to amass singularity (one).
A chosen one amasses each anointed one by tempting ones choice to ignore self discernment.
A purpose being hidden
Pur (forth) pose (position) aka position of being (life) put forth (inception towards death). It can't be hidden...each being can be tricked to hide from it.
It means that this place was created
Meaning was shaped by ones consent to suggested creationism. Holding onto a suggested shape distracts ones perception from perceivable change.
Perceivable doesn't create perception...it transfers form within flow aka transformation of all (change) into each one (shape). Consenting to hold onto a suggestion ignores trans-form-ation.
A contract binds ones choice from transfer.
been swallowed whole
Only a being can swallow other partials within whole. Something being swallowed cannot be whole. Thinking otherwise implies logic aka circular thinking aka the ouroboros eating itself.
We are supposed to know our world, and our reason for being.
We implies one joining others...to know implies one being set apart from others...reasoning implies one turning against others.
Ones consent to suggested pluralism (we) establishes a conflict of reason (we vs they) aka circular thinking within one (logic) turning into the outward ouroboros (reason) against other ones, while distracting one from thinking (perception) straight (perceivable).
manufactured reality
Real implies ones manual response within auto (self) mobile (moving) all. Ignoring ones response (perception) within auto-mobile all (perceivable) for manufactured fiction (suggested) by another implies ones free will of choice.
We were never meant to live like this
We (plural) shapes each different one (singular) into an "alike" mass.
desire to escape
Desire aka de (division) + sire (beget; to take)...a contradiction in terms. Few suggest escapism to distract many with taking from being divided from one another. Whatever one takes from another; one holds closer to self, hence corrupting divine/division.
Embrace this flat
Aka ignoring natural change perceived by holding onto artificial shape suggested...it doesn't matter if the shape is flat or round, when it's embracing which corrupts shaping.
Jesus Christ and to enslave
Christ (to anoint) implies each being set free from one another. Jesus (je suis; I am) implies taking possession over oneself (I) , while collectivizing other ones together (you). That establishes I (slave) under YOU (master) by giving plural more power than singular.
This is how you (phonetic jew) overthrows jesus (I am)...over and over again, while Christ is being ignored.
I urge you all: diligently study
Study/steu - "to strive/push/press forwards"...which for life being moved from inception towards death implies towards DEATH.
Tavi תָּוָה (tavah) - "to mark", hence marking (life) stock...
a) How does that jive with the infamous six million?
b) What if the opposite of prophesying outcome implies receiving origin?
c) What would a recipient be without a prophet?
aiming beams at each other for gold
Gold/ghel - "to shine" + beam - "ray of light"...
Turned Lead into Gold
a) Light directs beams apart. Turning against each other while being directed...temporarily shines.
To lead implies to direct...
b) Lead aka "least elastic and sonorous" + Gold aka "most ductile and malleable"...if only form (life) within flow (inception towards death) could be shaped from least elastic and sonorous towards most ductile and malleable.
Metal/mettle... https://www.etymonline.com/word/mettle
for a fraction of a second
Forwarding (inception towards death) a fraction (life) implies seco - "to divide"...
Notice that fract+ion implies the fracture of action into reactions.
Disclaimer...what was written above requires ones self dis-CERN-ment.
gematria
Aka geometry/geomancy... tricking ones mind to measure, hence holding onto suggested values, while ignoring that nature moves values apart from one another, hence establishing formed evaluation (perception) of flowing value (perceivable).
It's the consent of many to the suggestions of few which establishes an "identical numerical value", hence transforming each one (1) into a zero (0).
I'll never downdoot you
Which would imply 1 vs 1 within a conflict of reason. Both numerical values can be different, while VS (versus/verto - to turn) remains identical.
letter-by-letter
Ones consent to another ones suggestion implies one LETTING another one shape LETTERS.
Meanwhile in nature...if form (life) LETS flow (inception towards death); then form perishes faster, hence the need to resist wanted temptations.
For example...hunger and thirst. Does one LET hunger and thirst pass through one, or does one resist by eating and drinking?
according to
TO implies towards aka life being moved from inception TOWARDS death, while accord implies "coming into agreement". If ones mind agrees with being moved towards death, then...?
according to principle
Principle implies origin. Living originates from within the process of dying. Coming into agreement with dying...denies living.
destroy Tokyo with your newfound power.
If that's a Godzilla set-up, then I would much rather hang with my son or throw bananas at King Kong, than risk meeting any of those monsters Toshio Maeda made up in Tokyo.
- Gold/ghel - "to shine"
- Shine/scinan - "shed, send forth, or give out light; be radiant, be resplendent, illuminate"
It's not about holding onto any value...
Pizza sign + six pointed star...
resonance
Aka ones response (re) to all sound (son). One can only be within all if all separates each one from one another. Sound separates instruments...words lure listeners together.
flower of life
a) Life...a formed off-spring of flow (inception towards death).
b) Notice that the suggested flower of life has a circle around it, while form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies linear progression.
c) Flower with six petals? Six/seco (to divide) + petal/pete (to spread) aka all spreading each one by division.
Schumann resonance
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davidsb%C3%BCndler aka binding (bund) division (david)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Serapion_Brethren aka seraphim/seraph - "the burning one"
Hoffmann's colleague in the civil service and first biographer Julius Eduard Hitzig (Hitze; heat)...born Isaac Elias Itzig
A jew-man (schu-mann) binding and burning gentiles...
What do you think is going on here.. are we fucking "done"?
Motion goes on; any matter within gets done.
the "synopsis"
Motion details matter; while few within matter trick many into a synopsis as to obfuscate the details.
us trying to fight these guys
a) Us and these represents an artificial synopsis aka suggested pluralism...being implies each singular one detail within all of nature.
b) The fight is also artificial and based on ones consent to suggested pluralism, hence claiming to be a part of US establishing a conflict against THEM.
Notice that us vs them implies both sides turning (versus/verto - "to turn") against one another...there's the synopsis again.
there used to be whistle-blowers.. but.. that was it.. no more
If one blows a whistle, then one gives up ones position to others.
Notice that whistle and whisper imply the same root, while contradicting each other. It's that contradiction which leads to whistle-blowers being silenced.
Aka ones free will of choice between wanting to hold onto and needing to let go of.
The one suggesting the dollar knows that it has no value, yet the one consenting to the suggestion evaluates it for as long as it's being held onto.
TPTB* do not live in Israel
Israel aka yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" implies each ones position within all aka power of being.
a) Christian implies "to anoint" aka the separation of each being (anointed one) when coming through the birth-channel aka seed growing within s-OIL.
b) A jew suggests idealism, which becomes an idol when a gentile consents to hold onto it. Nature moves perceivable inspiration through each ones perception, while a jew suggests information to tempt gentiles to hold onto it within mind/memory...that's idolatry.
Inspiration cannot be held onto...only drawn from and adapted to on the fly, hence being within (in) the spirit (spir) of action (ation).
c) Contra implies "against"...being implies A GAIN (life) within loss (inception towards death). Only within loss can there be growth.
Nature moves beings within a straight line...a jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentiles to turn inwardly (circular logic) and outwardly (conflicts of reason aka contra aka versus/verto - "to turn").
Suggestion inVERTS perception if held onto...hence idolatry/idealism.
d) To analyze implies to dissect/separate/take apart etc. which is what a partial (ones perception) within whole (all perceivable) is based upon...the differentiation of potential (growth) during procession (loss).
Breathing/eating/drinking implies the dissection of what nature offers, and since nature moves through...each being LYZE ANAL aka the alimentary (life) canal opening (inception) and closing (death).
The opposite of analyzing implies synthesizing, which is what each jew tempts gentiles to do to each other aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka united states/united nations/united kingdom/european union/soviet union aka uniformity/university/unisex/unicef/unicode aka miscegenation/multiculturalism/mass migration/melting pot aka equality through diversity etc.
Nature sets apart...each jew tempts gentiles together.
e) Refute (to beat back) ignores that form (life) cannot beat back flow (inception towards death)...only each other. Refutation implies an artificial conflict distracting from nature admitting (inception) and dismissing (death).
f) Better implies vs worse...a conflict of reason aka one turning against others aka an inversion of nature separating each one apart from one another.
g) Hobby implies the jewish suggestion of favoritism, hence tempting gentiles to favor aka a bias of partiality, hence turning from being a partial into becoming a part of a collective of hobbyists.
Jesus is the mahadi created by the jews
a) Jesus aka je suis (I am) implies each gentile taking possession over oneself, which in return brands any other one a YOU (phonetic jew).
Christ (to anoint) implies the separation of all procession (inception towards death) into each one potential (life). Potential cannot take possession of procession...only onto self (logic) and each other (reason).
b) A jew suggests creationism aka creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing) to tempt gentiles to ignore the transformation of all flow (inception towards death) into each form (life)...not out of nothing; but within everything.
c) All WAS perceivable before anyone within can suggest what it IS.
IS implies fiction (suggestion); WAS implies reality (perception)...only oneself can discern this.
- Chicanery/schikken - "to arrange"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/chicanery
How could one disassemble spell-craft without rearranging? Nature arranges each ones perception after all perceivable... artificial suggestions are arranged in-between ones perception and all perceivable.
For example...etymological chicanery. Etymo-logic-al aka suggested (logic) in-between all (al) perceivable and ones responding senses (etymo). How could one set apart logic without chicanery?
- Coherent aka co (together) haerere (to stick)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/coherent
Free will of choice needs to set apart what other stick together as to remain FREE. A jew suggests coherent thought to stick gentiles together, while ignoring that nature separates each ones perception within all perceivable to allow free thinking.
The coherence you seek represents collective consciousness aka "hive mind"...that's how each jew controls goyim/golem from outside (aboutism).
I'm not sure why i return
Because "mostly_bots" implies an agenda driven username...
why can't we block free-will-of-choice?
a) If it's free; then it can't be blocked...
b) Think about the implication of publicly calling for the blocking of ones free will of choice...on a conspiracy forum.
c) Free will of choice cannot represent a plural (we); only each singular (one).
HOLO (whole) CAUST (to burn) aka burned (life) offering (inception towards death) aka the process of dying kindling (inception) and extinguishing (death) each living flame within.
Remember the little flame demon called "Calcifer" from Howl's Moving Castle? Flame (life) + calcification (to become hardened like bone)...
masonic
Sound sets apart; mag puts together. A jew shapes words within sound to tempt gentiles together, which in return permits each jew to operate apart within sound, while gentiles are stuck together within crafted spells of words.
Freemasonic implies ones FREE will of choice consenting to suggested MAG, while ignoring perceivable SONIC.
Sleight of hand...Sonic the Hedgehog aka hedging (artificially fencing in) and hogging (holding onto) perceivable knowl-EDGE within sound.
"But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." ~ Genesis 2:17
Robotnik aka to nik/nix (cancel) robot/robur (strength)...hence Sonic continuously destroying the EGG of MAN.
Aka artificially mixing together what nature sets apart.
Aka ones consent (to buy) to a suggestion (to sell) deceiving ones perception into selling self out.
Rule/reg aka to move in (life) a straight line (inception towards death)...it's circular logic within self turning into conflicts of reason against others which rolls together (con-trol) many under few.
Secret/seco - "to divide"...mixing consent and suggested together implies an attack on all perceivable setting each ones perception apart from one another.
a) One cannot act...only react.
b) Innocence aka within (in) harm (nocere) aka being (life) within harms way (inception towards death). Ignoring this by consenting to the suggestion of another implies guilt/gieldan - "to pay for, debt".
Violence (inception towards death) sets each peace/piece (life) apart from one another...rationalizing aka reasoning implies peaces/pieces at war with one another.