TL;DR: We’ll take a look at the origins of mundane BFGoodrich tires and see that they will lead us to present day headlines.
The Wikipedia page for BFGoodrich is not long at all, but it starts off with a bang. Right at the top it lists three “noteworthy vehicles” that have been equipped with their tires. The #2 slot:
In 1927 Charles Lindbergh's airplane, the "Spirit of St. Louis," which made the first successful solo non-stop flight across the Atlantic, was fitted with BFGoodrich tires.
A noteworthy flight to be sure, but then again airplanes rely on their tires only in a sort of auxiliary way, don’t they? If the tires fail during use, by definition you’re already on the ground. So an odd selection, isn’t it?
Personally, I suggest it was included because the flight was another capstone historical hoax. Miles Mathis argues that point in his paper, “Lucky Lindy?” (2/23/2016 34-page PDF). To that paper, I would add that the flight was another Salem Witch psyop. Mathis doesn’t say that because he exists not to say that, if you catch my meaning.
I have come to understand that these little anomalous insertions are a sort of inside joke or occulted signal. You may have noticed that the third noteworthy vehicle was one of the Space Shuttles. Was that an occult signal? You’ll have to wait a couple more posts to find out.
… the B.F. Goodrich Company, later known as BFGoodrich, was among the first rubber tire manufacturers to be located west of the Appalachian mountain range.
That’s a funny way to state the situation. BFGoodrich was founded in 1870 in Akron, Ohio. Then about 30 years later, the two other major tire manufacturers we’ve studied set up shop at the same time in the very same city. Does that make any sense? I have never seen that question asked, let alone answered.
Regarding the Salem Witches, they nearly give the game away at the starting gun. BFGoodrich was founded by Benjamin F. Goodrich (1841-1988). I had heard the brand name all my life but and I did not know until I began this research that “BF” stood for “Benjamin Franklin”.
Now, I get it, sure, lots of people have been named after admirable personages from history. It’s not popular anymore because it’s nearly impossible to find any people so admired that you would name your child after them. Worse, as a society we have forgotten that such people can and did exist and walked amongst us.
But Ben Franklin is a special case: (1) a Salem Witch, (2) made it to the hundo along with innumerable other references, and (3) very few suspect anything about him. The point is, if you start paying attention any time you hear the name “Franklin”, you’ll get some creepy vibes. Remember the “Franklin Scandal”? How about the place where many suspect the Black Dahlia was ritually murdered? Formally called the John Sowden House, it’s more commonly known as the “Franklin House”. See?
Moving on, we should examine Goodrich’s Wikipedia page. For example, for health reasons he retired to Manitou Springs, Colorado. That’s just west of Colorado Springs and thus an hour south of—you got it—the Denver Stronghold.
I suppose it’s trivial, but the main road through the center of Manitou Springs was one of the direct paths to the base of Pikes Peak. It’s named after Zebulon Pike who was a cousin of—you got it—Albert Pike, and both were descendants of Major Robert Pike of the Salem Witch Trials.
This also may seem trivial, but it’s the kind of tiny red flag I have to look for to reconstruct the pieces of this occulted history: one of the founders of Manitou Springs was a physician and land developer named William Abraham Bell (1841-1921). Now, why might that have any significance?
Goodrich was the first in Akron to own a telephone, which was a gift from Alexander Graham Bell in 1877. The telephone connected Goodrich's house on Quaker Street to his factory on Rubber Street.
William Abraham Bell and Alexander Graham Bell (1847-1922) were born only six years apart. Quite a coincidence, huh? They could be brothers for all I know but simply neglected to notify us of that. Something to follow up on later.
Also note yet another connection to the Quakers. It just came up in the Firestone post. I mean, even now there are only about 85k Quakers in North America, yet somehow we keep hitting them over and over centuries ago. Tell me that organization isn’t somehow wrapped up in all this.
Before we get to the heavier genealogy, there are certain red flags anyone (with the right background) could spot in Benjamin’s “Personal life” section (boldface mine):
On November 4, 1869, Goodrich was married to Mary Elizabeth Marvin (1841–1907), a daughter of U.S. Representative Richard Pratt Marvin….
[daughter] Isabella Goodrich Breckinridge (1874–1961), who married John Cabell Breckinridge II (1870–1941), a grandson of John Cabell Breckinridge (the former Vice President of the United States under James Buchanan, a Confederate general and Confederate Secretary of War).
[son] David Marvin Goodrich (1876–1950), who became a Goodrich executive. He married Ruth Williams Pruyn, a daughter of banker Robert C. Pruyn in 1903. They divorced and in 1936 he married Beatrice (née Morgan) Pruyn, daughter of William Fellowes Morgan Sr. and the ex-wife of his first wife's brother.
Through his daughter Isabella, he was a grandfather of Marvin Breckinridge Patterson, the photojournalist, cinematographer, and philanthropist, who married diplomat Jefferson Patterson.
Pretty decent haul from one cast of the net, isn’t it? An even bigger haul results from examining the “Ancestors” back to the 2g-grandparents of Benjamin Franklin Goodrich MD. Most directly, there are four women carrying Salem Witch maiden names:
-
grandmother Rhoda (Butler) Jepson (1743-1833)
-
grandmother Eunice (Warner) Goodrich (1765-1820)
-
2g-grandmother Sarah (Williams) Goodrich (1698-1781)
-
2g-grandmother Elizabeth (Curtis) Hanmar (1707-1789)
You know what? Let’s not do all the detailed genealogy this time. I don’t think there’s much to be learned and everyone is free to do it on their own time to confirm or deny the Salem Witchiness of these ladies. Instead, believe it or not there are actually additional names from that single tab that I wish to discuss individually.
First, we intersect with research already on the books. Goodrich had a 2g-grandmother named Mehitable (Russell) Deming (1704-1784). Her father was Noadiah Russell (1659-1713). We discussed Noahdiah in:
“Skull and Bones” is just another project of the Salem Witches (conspiracies.win 8/6/2025)
Mehitable was—if I get my genealogy right—the great-aunt of William Huntington Russell (1809-1885). William Huntington founded Skull & Bones and Noahdiah founded Yale itself. In their spare time, the Russells were up to their nipples in the opium trade and thus the Opium Wars.
Next, Goodrich had a grandmother named Susannah (Bell) Dinsmore (1766-1807). The “Bell” stuff before, the idea that Goodrich may have some association with the guy that invented the telephone may have seemed far-fetched, but does that fetch seem quite as far now?
Yes, I peeked ahead and the phone guy’s ancestry is full of Salem Witch names. Know what the most interesting one is, IMHO? He had a 2g-grandmother named Isabella Swan. There were three Swans (and a Swain) at Salem.
Do you recall the name of the controversial FBI Director who passed away just a couple of months ago before he could tell any tales? Robert Swan Mueller III. His wife was Anne Cabell Standish. The phone guy’s dad’s name was Alexander Melville Bell. Bob had a granddad named Melville Douglas Truesdale. I’m cramming all this in now because I feel like with the volume of material already on deck, I’ll never get back around to documenting where everyone really got their phones from.
Next, Goodrich had a 2g-grandmother named Elizabeth (Todd) Bell (1689-1771). Todd is a rather unusual surname and it certainly reminds us of Mary Todd Lincoln (1818-1882). Her husband, Honest Abe, was very much a Salem Witch. I have never written them up but her family, the Todds, appear very much to be Salem Witches also.
Next, Goodrich had a 2g-grandmother named Annis (Cargill) McKeen (abt. 1688 - 1782). Now, the name Cargill is not a known Salem Witch name and has never come up before, but I immediately thought of the absolutely ginormous American multinational food corporation, Cargill:
As of 2023, Cargill was the largest privately held company in the United States in terms of revenue.
Cargill has been a subject of long-term and widespread scrutiny for a variety of issues, including child trafficking and child slave labor and other human rights abuses, union busting, ignoring worker safety during COVID-19, land grabbing, food contamination with mercury and E. coli, deforestation, air pollution, tax evasion, animal abuse, toxic spills, building on restorable wetlands, contributing to the antibiotic resistance crisis, and price fixing.
Revenue in 2022 of $165 billion, employing 160k worldwide as of 2024. Without researching any further, which are you taking in the office pool I’m putting together: “Cargill = Salem Witch” or “Cargill =/= Salem Witch”?
Let me now make a bold claim: the Salem Witches, the Frankfurter Hexen, and some of their global counterparts are ultimately behind Zionism. I’m not going to present the case fully here because if I wrote five posts just trying to briefly document car tires, how long is the case about Zionism going to be?
We can boil it down very, very quickly, though, with the assertion that Zionism would never have gotten anywhere were it not for the covert branch of it called “Christian Zionism”. If you’ve never heard that term spoken aloud on any TV, now you know what “covert” means. It’s not secret, it’s just that nobody knows about it and that’s by design.
A main part of the CZ project was to write what amounts to a “Talmud for Christians”. It would form the authority for that entire school of religious—and ultimately political—doctrine. It was called the Scofield Reference Bible (1909), written by a man known as C.I. Scofield (1843-1921).
Again, we aren’t here to discuss “Da Joos” or any such thing, and if you’re waiting for that, please hit “EJECT” now. I mean, look at all the context necessary to properly frame and exhibit only two references, which is my goal. You can make of these references what you please. We already discussed one of those, and in a far different context:
Regarding the assassination of Charlie Kirk (4 of 2): Charlie the Salem Witch (conspiracies.win 10/3/2025)
From Charlie promoting Zionism, we get: Christian Zionism -> Scofield Reference Bible (1909) -> Cyrus Ingerson Scofield (1843-1921) -> Dwight L. Moody (1837-1899) -> Edward Norris Kirk (1802-1874) -> Mount Vernon Church, Boston (1842).
So trying to connect Zionism to Kirk, we hit Scofield, see? And we finally come to the new bit: the founder of BFGoodrich had a 2g-grandfather named Gideon Goodrich (abt. 1695 - 1769). Another one of Gideon’s 2g-grandsons was—you got it—Cyrus Ingerson Scofield (1843-1921).
Not to get into all this now—and you’re free to believe it is mere happenstance—but the mother of Cyrus was a Goodrich, he himself married a Hall, his daughter married a Kellogg, his great-grandmother was a Clark, and his grandmother was an Ingerson. Oh, is that last one new to you? Well, the story attached to it is strange indeed but must wait for another day.
Cyrus came into all this over a century ago. The crazy heretical ideas come directly from the Scofield Reference Bible and all the jackass evangelists that evangelize it. I said “came into” but the context tells us more precisely that he “was sent”. Cyrus was only doing as he was tasked and, like so many others, thought he was a big hero. Be very careful when you find yourself thinking you’re a hero.
I will amplify on this last connection in a future post. In the meantime, thanks for your attention to this matter!
Awesome as always.
Thanks so much! They say that the truth is stranger than fiction but trust me, I never once envisioned quoting and hyperlinking to it and having it all come out more bizarre than the kookiest novel.
In honor of the beginning and ending of the first Salem witch trial on this date in 1692, that of Bridget Bishop, I'd like to ask:
Is your dominant theory then that both the accusers and the convicts were part of a deceptive purge that actually assisted them with consolidating power and resurfacing in the later globalist structures observed?
And does this suggest that earlier trials, such as of Romani, vampires, Jews, or Templars were also often kayfabe to cover for both sides, the alleged hexers and the alleged executioners, who then embraced again after the show closed? Hexecution, that's funny.
First, yes, there is, so far as I can tell, no separation or distinction between victims, the accused, judges, witnesses, etc. IOW, nothing has ever come to the fore of my mind on that issue and I lump them all together.
That being said, there is probably some amount of texture to that we'll never be able to know. In summary, we can't say "the whole thing was fake" but must say, "the whole thing was fake(asterisk)".
There were a number of other witch trials in this period, both before and after Salem, in New England and back in what is now the UK. The starting point seems to be "Witchmaster General" Matthew Hopkins or maybe a little before him, and the end seems to have come with the Witchcraft Act of 1735. I label all this under the rubric of "Salem Witches" to avoid unnecessary detail.
These same people were around and about, here and there, doing all kinds of shenanigans, nothing to do with witchery at all. I mean, if They had conveniently gathered to stage a huge phony rap tournament in 1692 where I could easily identify them, I would have called them the "Salem Rap Battlers".
Even this deep into the research, I have no clear idea why they did any of it. It was "social engineering", psyops like any other, but what they hoped to achieve specifically is almost totally unknown to me.
Well, influence and control, but then again Their ideas on that are different from what almost anyone would imagine. People think about money, offices, titles, rank, ownership, money, and more money. Crowley said that magick was, "the art and science of causing change to occur in conformity with the will." This is what They seek, all those other things being only tools or byproducts.
As far as witchcraft in any of the trials, I do not think any such thing was involved in any of this. No witches, no magical powers, no curses, nothing. You read the claims and it's as laughable as any UFO abduction story in the National Enquirer.
Indeed, it's a much longer story but I have reason to believe that "magick" is the only kind of "magic" which They are permitted to use, any sort of supernatural powers being strictly forbidden.
As far as generalizing to any other similar sets of trials, I wouldn't do it without "doing the work" to show that they were faked, then working outward from there. It turns out that so much in history that seemed above suspicion is full of BS, and real and important stuff--if it did not go "Their" way--gets wiped from the record. So you can start with suspicion but you must still do the research and present the case.
Even the claim I make from time to time that these people are "Satanists" has a tremendous amount of context behind that. The most important aspect is that within the bloodlines, even when someone is involved in some way, it's all compartmentalized. Jay Parker knew about his family's SRA but had zero clue about all these historical psyops.
Conversely, I believe that most of the public figures I highlight are far more manipulated than the rest of us and ignorant of anything like "Satanism". These (excuse my language) fuckwads are so insufferably smug. They love signalling their superiority, but I could only point to a couple of instances where one of them dropped a clue that they had any idea whatsoever that they know something that I know about all this.
In any case, it's all a lot to unravel.
based
a) Achieve from Vulgar Latin accapare, from Late Latin ad caput - "to come to a head"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/achieve
Tempting many to specify suggested information within their heads permits few to shape hope and fear within the mental archive.
b) If you write "unknown to me"; then "me" implies your hope to hold self in possession or the fear to lose self...knowledge cannot be possessed. Knowledge implies a process (cause) moving through potential (effect).
c) Using suggestion to tempt perception into ignorance represents witchcraft aka another "crafting which" one chooses.
It's consenting to any suggested signal/signum (identifying mark) which makes oneself inferior to another.