Correct, and what laws did Noah promulgate in truth? How did he define idolatry when he offered animals to God? Surely he believed in the seed of the woman to come.
Humanity has surrendered itself to essentially to what amounts to
Essential implies "essence within all" aka each ones state of being. Amounting implies essence (potential) shaped into a substance (possession)...self surrender.
a) All sets one free. Religion binds one to one another while ignoring all.
b) All moves through one. Holding onto religion establishes constipation within one.
c) Maybe implies may/magh (to be able) be (being; essence). All enables each one; few suggest "maybe" as an auxiliary of prediction to tempt many to ignore all.
Despite the apparent early date for Moses and his commandments, it is really only in the post-Babylonian period that we can speak of ‘Mosaic’ Judaism, when a priestly caste and a fantasy history of race origins are in place. It is only after the Babylonian experience that the Jews adopted a monotheistic religion, with Yahweh as sole god, not merely as chief god. And with this single ‘jealous’ god, the priests imposed a rigid liturgical year, a regimen in which readings from the Torah (Genesis through to Deuteronomy) were to be read successively and completed within the year.
By the closing years of the 6th century BC the priesthood had codified their tribal rules, and were writing with all the authority of their singular deity.
The famed ‘Ten Commandments’ – even today erroneously accepted in the popular mind as absolute and universal rules to live by – are nothing other than a codification of Jewish male property rights.
In their original full versions, two of the commandments endorse slavery; the taboo on adultery was an attempt to stop polygamous Jewish males taking each others wives (‘foreign’ concubines and wives had no rights); the ‘honour’ to be accorded parents merely endorsed a draconian patriarchal social structure; even the taboo on murder was open to interpretation, since the slaying of enemies and wrong-doers would not be ‘murder’ but the Lord’s will!
Here was intolerance writ large. No spirit of ‘live and let live.’ In essentials, these barbarous ‘Laws’ ratified the correctness of annihilating enemies, the subjugation of women, the enslavement of conquered tribes, the suppression of dissent and the curtailment of any liberality, especially relating to the body or sexuality.
1 (natural singularity) 0 (artificial denial)...one denies natural for artificial when com (together) mand (mandate) ment (mind).
Mandate refers to manually giving consent to any suggestion of another.
Intolerance writ large
a) Intolerance implies "unwillingness"...being implies given will. It's denial of ones choice for a chosen ones suggestion which establishes intolerance.
b) No matter how large or small one writes...the line within which one writes can never be fulfilled.
mosaic
Aka putting partials together to make whole...a game of puzzle.
origins are in place
Only within origin can there be placement.
the Babylonian experience
Aka the confusion of tongues from singularity (sound > instrument) into plurality (sound > word > instrument) establishing BA'BEL, noun - "confusion; disorder".
the jews adopted...a religion
If a gentile ADOPTS religion; then each jew ADAPTS without competition aka if ones choice re (to respond) ligo (to bind) then each chosen one remains free to choose.
with Yahweh as sole
a) WITH contradicts sole.
b) Yahweh implies a suggestible word among each divided being within the singularity of natural sound. It's consenting to the suggested word which represents pluralism.
c) Yahweh/havah - "was" aka singularity (cause) was before each single unit (effect) comes into being. Suggesting what Yahweh IS by shaping a label/libel tempts ones perception to deny what WAS perceivable.
erroneously accepted
Acceptance or denial of natural delineation (inception towards death) erodes being (life).
property rights
Right/reg (to move in a straight way) implies proper (forwards). Nature implies the property right each being needs to resist...a jew tempts gentiles to want property rights to hold onto.
Holding onto reduces resistance, hence moving anything held onto out of ones hold quicker, which in return permits each jew to freely use whatever gentiles are lacking in resistance to hold onto.
Humanity has surrendered itself to essentially what amounts to the Seven Laws of Noah and Sharia Law while thinking that they are free.
This is how vicious the Judeo-Globalist brainwashing of humanity is.
Do the sons of Noah, including yourself, jointly agree as sovereigns on what the laws of Noah are, Rex?
Truth isn’t a matter of agreement.
Correct, and what laws did Noah promulgate in truth? How did he define idolatry when he offered animals to God? Surely he believed in the seed of the woman to come.
Essential implies "essence within all" aka each ones state of being. Amounting implies essence (potential) shaped into a substance (possession)...self surrender.
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Frank-harris-hold-on-to-the-vision-lyrics + https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcThFswcLB0
They (plural) are free (singular)...are you sure about that?
There can be only one L(and) A(ir) W(ater)...S(plit)EVEN.
An ark/arc puts those S(plit)EVEN into noah/noach (rest) aka the intermission of labor.
Deluded nonsense.
The only way back from the brink is through Jesus.
Sounds like what Joseph Smith said of the Christians.
Maybe all the religions are ass
Make sure to include athiesm in there.
They are a cult too lol.
Communism is a theist system with the country leader as a God.
By that logic, pre-1945 Japan would be communist
They viewd their emperor as a god
They viewed the Emperor as a messenger of the Gods.
Stalin and Mao have all but become the only God themselves.
I see.
Alright.
I agree. Political cults suck ass as well.
The loudest ones, the r/atheist ones, aren't much more than contrarian pedants.
a) All sets one free. Religion binds one to one another while ignoring all.
b) All moves through one. Holding onto religion establishes constipation within one.
c) Maybe implies may/magh (to be able) be (being; essence). All enables each one; few suggest "maybe" as an auxiliary of prediction to tempt many to ignore all.
10 Commandments? Intolerance writ large
Despite the apparent early date for Moses and his commandments, it is really only in the post-Babylonian period that we can speak of ‘Mosaic’ Judaism, when a priestly caste and a fantasy history of race origins are in place. It is only after the Babylonian experience that the Jews adopted a monotheistic religion, with Yahweh as sole god, not merely as chief god. And with this single ‘jealous’ god, the priests imposed a rigid liturgical year, a regimen in which readings from the Torah (Genesis through to Deuteronomy) were to be read successively and completed within the year.
By the closing years of the 6th century BC the priesthood had codified their tribal rules, and were writing with all the authority of their singular deity.
The famed ‘Ten Commandments’ – even today erroneously accepted in the popular mind as absolute and universal rules to live by – are nothing other than a codification of Jewish male property rights.
In their original full versions, two of the commandments endorse slavery; the taboo on adultery was an attempt to stop polygamous Jewish males taking each others wives (‘foreign’ concubines and wives had no rights); the ‘honour’ to be accorded parents merely endorsed a draconian patriarchal social structure; even the taboo on murder was open to interpretation, since the slaying of enemies and wrong-doers would not be ‘murder’ but the Lord’s will!
Here was intolerance writ large. No spirit of ‘live and let live.’ In essentials, these barbarous ‘Laws’ ratified the correctness of annihilating enemies, the subjugation of women, the enslavement of conquered tribes, the suppression of dissent and the curtailment of any liberality, especially relating to the body or sexuality.
1 (natural singularity) 0 (artificial denial)...one denies natural for artificial when com (together) mand (mandate) ment (mind).
Mandate refers to manually giving consent to any suggestion of another.
a) Intolerance implies "unwillingness"...being implies given will. It's denial of ones choice for a chosen ones suggestion which establishes intolerance.
b) No matter how large or small one writes...the line within which one writes can never be fulfilled.
Aka putting partials together to make whole...a game of puzzle.
Only within origin can there be placement.
Aka the confusion of tongues from singularity (sound > instrument) into plurality (sound > word > instrument) establishing BA'BEL, noun - "confusion; disorder".
If a gentile ADOPTS religion; then each jew ADAPTS without competition aka if ones choice re (to respond) ligo (to bind) then each chosen one remains free to choose.
a) WITH contradicts sole.
b) Yahweh implies a suggestible word among each divided being within the singularity of natural sound. It's consenting to the suggested word which represents pluralism.
c) Yahweh/havah - "was" aka singularity (cause) was before each single unit (effect) comes into being. Suggesting what Yahweh IS by shaping a label/libel tempts ones perception to deny what WAS perceivable.
Acceptance or denial of natural delineation (inception towards death) erodes being (life).
Right/reg (to move in a straight way) implies proper (forwards). Nature implies the property right each being needs to resist...a jew tempts gentiles to want property rights to hold onto.
Holding onto reduces resistance, hence moving anything held onto out of ones hold quicker, which in return permits each jew to freely use whatever gentiles are lacking in resistance to hold onto.