Just a historical reminder: The grandfather of Canada's current Deputy Fuhrer, Chrystia Freeland, was himself a Ukrainian Nazi, their leading propagandist as a matter of fact.
According to Himka, the anti-Jewish materials published in Krakiws'ki Visti contributed to the mass murder of Jews.
Was she at the ceremony? It all must have brought a tear to her eye. Ja wohl!
There's really this mindset, beyond everyday lunacy, that seems to occur in relation to the Holocaust. Scientists need to study it but never will. Check out what this other liar had to say:
Man who claimed to have escaped Auschwitz admits he lied for years (11/26/2019)
In his letter, Hirt said that he realized “it wasn’t about me”, and that he was motivated to lie by his fears that the history and horror of the camps would be forgotten.
And I actually believe he's sincere. But how do you get from, "I don't have first-hand evidence, so I've got to take the word of others," all the way to, "The word of others is so true I'll make up first-hand evidence to prove it"?
Like I say, somebody needs to invent a word for this level of brainwashed.
Yeah, I didn't know there were various expurgated versions until I read that article. Too hot for 7th grade in the old days! You wonder why the lefties don't demand every schoolkid read it in full. Not enough trans stuff?
Here's a little article about the author of "Night", Elie Wiesel:
Buchenwald Memorial Archivist Cannot ID Elie Wiesel as an Inmate (11/27/2011)
More questions arise about the Holohoax. What a shock, eh?
Ah, allow me to correct myself from the hastily written reply to some barely remembered material:
Meye Levin didn't write any part of the diary, but he wrote a play based on the diary. One thing led to another and he filed suit, which you can read about here:
Levin Gets $ 50 , 000 in 'Diary' Lawsuit | The American Jewish World, 17 January 1958
I should have referenced the more well-known "ballpoint controversy", which you can read up on here:
The Diary of Anne Frank 5.0, an update (Gilad Atzmon 8/3/2016)
Finally, there's a TON of surrounding context--especially about Otto--in this article:
What The Holocaust Establishment will Never Say About Anne Frank: VT Investigates asking what really happened to Anne Frank and what role did Otto Frank play? (Veterans Today 1/23/2017)
Hope this helps!
TBH, Otto hired a professional writer for at least some of it. He didn't pay (surprise) then was sued by the guy and lost.
But, you know, I'm trying to write a social media post title, not a high school English paper.
The verse I found shocking was Matthew 10:34 (and repeated in Luke 12:51):
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
I wasn't shocked that Jesus said it, because I understand what he means, but I wondered, "Where is everybody getting all this 'Prince of Peace' stuff? Are any of them even reading the Bible?" Guess not, huh?
And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another. And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many. And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold.
Note: I'm certainly not one of those "The Bible predicted it all!" people. I just find it startling to think this was written down 2000 years ago.
As far as the "silence" from the protesters and their relatives and friends, I've got this very weird sneaking suspicion (you heard it here first!) that most or all of them don't exist. The arrests, unlawful detention, abuse, etc, are all just to frighten the public.
The same howling silence is all around the issue. Where are their families, friends and lawyers making public statements and being interviewed by alt-media? Shouldn't there be show trials? Isn't there a single govt whistleblower who bailed out after becoming worried about personally getting in trouble for all this? Nope, just a slow drip, drip of "right or wrong, everyone better watch their step or you'll end up like these poor fucks."
Personally, I think Russia knows all this and trolled the US government. They came out with a statement about the 400 and whatever number of political prisoners the US was holding. First I ever heard a specific number, actually.
So what's the US supposed to say? "Hey, you're wrong, it's all a psyop on our own citizens!", or "Yeah, we do have political prisoners because we're totalitarians like the Bolsheviks!" No, if what I think is correct there's nothing they could say. And what did they actually say? Nothing.
As concerns Anatoly Fomenko, his New Chronology, Biblical history, and the related Biblical timeline, one should be aware that in his book, "Tsar of the Slavs", Fomenko dates the Nativity to (what we now call) 1152 AD and the Crucifixion to 1185 AD. Sound loony right up until you read the compelling evidence for it.
As one can imagine, this throws a lot of the chronology into disarray. In a certain way, though, one can save a lot of time by disregarding the chronological work of researchers that are not aware of this foundation issue.
The most intriguing death, in my opinion, is the murder of Ashley Babbitt. And I don't say "murder" (only) because I'm outraged at this unlawful and unnecessary death.
If you go back and carefully watch the video, the guy's behavior is literally unexplained. He lays in wait, hiding from her view way off to the side. In murder cases this is prima facie evidence of "malice aforethought". He wanted to make sure she died.
Then, of course, the entire Establishment goes to bat for him as a hero. On the reverse side, there's also a huge contradictory social media disinfo push to say the entire thing was fake. The handful of conspiracy theorists that had picked up the scent are thrown off, never to return.
There's much more to the story, involving the scripting of J6, Nancy Pelosi's laptop, Jayden X and his true identity, etc, etc. But no one really cares at this point.
And while murder is very bad, to be sure, that lack of interest is, in a way, a much bigger problem.
Left turn here, but it points at what I see as the deep problem:
The other night I watched "Dredd", the one from 10 years ago. It takes place in a terrible dystopian megalopolis overrun with crime, right? What I noticed, though, is that even in that portrayal, 0.1% are ultra-criminals but 99.9% are just ordinary law-abiding people going about their business.
If we look around today, that's not what we see and not where we're headed. It's worse than a comic book writer could imagine.
The reason society is not (or historically had not been) overrun with crime wasn't because of ubiquitous and merciless law enforcement, or elaborate surveillance and security systems, or impenetrable defenses of people and property. It was because almost everyone found such behavior unthinkable.
You could theoretically commit crimes of all types, of course, but somewhere along the line in some way or another you absorbed that you should not. It was something you simply did not do. I came to realize that that had been woven into the very fabric of our societies, and was indeed an essential part of anything we would care to call "society".
But it is that process, that fabric, that the Elites have managed to erode. The resulting chaos and destruction are simply downstream effects of that.
So it's not just altering shoplifting laws and defunding police and prisoner release and the like, another big part is the ever more obvious two-tier "justice system". For example, if the cops found a baggie of coke in your house, would they just walk off and that would be the end of it? Sure, if you lived in the White House.
We all followed the law (more or less) because... we all followed the law (more or less). Plato pointed this out a long, long time ago:
Where the law is subject to some other authority and has none of its own, the collapse of the state, in my view, is not far off….
I guess that's one for all the doomers out there.
Ah, well, you know, they don't allow any crime in Baltimore so it was probably a huge deal. It's not like They want to keep a permanent underclass of people under "correctional supervision".
Given her record in CA, President Harris will ensure a whole new wave of "justice" washes across the land!
Off-topic but talking about real names from the Rittenhouse case:
There are two very distinct people "They" fronted in that case as "Joshua Ziminski". It was never in the news coverage, but Ziminski (the tall version) fired the shot in the air that was literally the starting pistol for the whole event (an assassination that didn't come off as desired).
There's no way in hell Kyle's lawyers could not have stumbled across what I stumbled across regarding Ziminski, which told me they were in on it to some extent and that the trial was a stage play.
BTW, in the linked article it states $1,500 bail for TWO FELONIES? Jesus.
Since Nixon was universally reviled and ridiculed as Worst President Ever (until the rise of Trump, of course), we can probably safely assume he had some good aspects.
Nixon was a product of Prescott Bush, but I would contend he was never "in the club" (literally and figuratively). The evidence:
richard nixon: bohemian grove "most faggy god dammed thing you could ever imagine" (YT 0:38)
I mean, if you're not down with some good old hot dude-on-dude action, you are in no way ready for child rape and torture, blood drinking, cannibalism. etc. Can't trust a guy like that, and he's useful only as long as he's useful.
Something to look out as a way the Elites may handle this problem:
No one "gets AIDS". It simply means your immune system is trashed. Supposedly this is the end result of infection with HIV, but even that is highly questionable and the topic for another day.
So if people are having their immune systems wrecked via injection, an easy way to hide the problem is to say, "Oh no, look at all these people getting AIDS!"
Then, of course, they can make those lemons into lemonade and say, "All these sex-positive people need to get on safe and effective PReP! How about we start with primary school children who are already learning all about how to get freaky?"
I think the best analogy here is the tried and true sheep and shepherds: a few of the sheep broke down part of the fence and walked out. Over time, more and more sheep are finding their way out of that same break. It's gaining momentum in an uncontrollable way.
If anyone has ever worked with sheep (or just about any livestock), it's pretty much pointless to stand at the fence and yell at the sheep and threaten them with all manner of dire consequences if they don't come back. To get them to do anything, whether it be with a carrot or a stick, you must get out in front of them.
So to do that back in the real world, they've got to get their disinfo agents out in front. That means they've got to have them dish out more truth than they ever have before. You can see it all over the place, from Stew Peters to Robert Malone to RFK Jr. They try to limit and disfigure and otherwise "demilitarize" the truth they give out, but there's still a lot of damage being done.
The whole point is that if you put your faith in any of these disinfo agents, they can and will eventually lead you back into the pen. And if anyone feels like saying, "Hey, how dare you accuse ____ of being disnfo! He's a great guy we should all trust!", well then, we'll all get to see the mechanism at work.
The overall significance is that while we all should still tread carefully, this phenomenon is very good news. They are losing control, they know it, they're getting desperate, and this is the counter-action they're taking.
Obvious and lame when you just back up a step a take a good look.
You know what sort of "pop theology" really got me? So many people say, "The Old Testament God is very different from the New Testament God, and so therefore blah blah blah."
I actually repeated that first part many times to other people, coming off like I knew something about the Bible. But when I actually began to study bits of it here and there, it gradually emerged how totally wrong even that simple understanding was.
Yahweh is barely even mentioned in the New Testament, mostly just in the very strange Revelation. (And even Revelation, popularly understood only from the "futurist" perspective, is in main clearly about the past with only a minor part a description of the coming times.)
In the OT, OTOH, Yahweh is all over it, in first-person no less, and he changes attitude quite drastically in the course of it. No one ever, ever mentions that, to the extent that it appears literally incomprehensible to them.
I often think, "What the hell have all these people been studying all these centuries?" I mean, there are entire Christian bookstores! What could be in all those books? I find it all mind-boggling and pretty much the last thing I ever expected.
The field is wide open, and customers are clamoring for you to take their money.
I just listened to the latest THC episode with The Arkon and The Greek. I have never in my life heard such high-speed disjointed deranged nonsense in my life. I felt slightly psychotic just by listening.
So the bar is really, really, really, really low. And actually, maybe it's not so much customer purchases as CIA funding and the gullible, distracted masses thinking they're getting knowledge for free.
It's ironic. No Republicans voted for Biden, so we know they're not black.