This is good news. Trump outmaneuvered Them and there's nothing They can do about it without the possibility of making it even worse.
The confirmation is this: The mainstream criticizes and demonizes Trump about anything and everything to an absurd extent about even trivial matters. Why aren't they slamming him for this? CNN doesn't even mention it on their homepage. "We're all gonna die!" That's not so hard to say, is it?
But there's nothing, and that is the anomaly. The reason is that as a basic rule of psychological manipulation, every time They take a big "L", They go silent on it.
People have a lot of other things to think about and they will soon forget, if they even heard about it in the first place. Thus, They never suffered a defeat. Their enemies (who you are to think are your enemies) never did anything for you.
"Their" silence speaks volumes.
PS: People should research the original US v. Miller case, which allowed Federal regulation of short-barreled shotguns in the first place. It's a ridiculously engineered psyop.
When I look around, I observe that the vast majority of conspiracy theorists are crusaders engaged in fights with clouds of smoke. They condemn all who are not fighting the same smoke clouds. And they are exceedingly proud of themselves, as it is clear that they're giving that smoke a helluva beating.
The real powers need only stand outside the smoke, outside the range of the wild swinging.
Haha, it's definitely a lot to process!
As for me, well, I've just had a lot more time exposed to it. You get used to it, in a way. And I always come back to the fact that what's there is there. You can ignore it but it won't go away.
Since I simply do not and will never believe that the Universe is some arbitrary Simulation or or some magical Fantasyland where anything and everything might have or will happen for no reason whatsoever, well, then I've got to try to make some sense of it all.
For example, a couple of days ago I heard about a lame goofball copy of Stonehenge outside of Austin. Never heard of it before but the builder has a Salem Witch name so I do a little research. Within about three steps I'm in Frankfurt in 1868. WTH are the chances of that unless I'm actually tracing something that is really there? Full writeup to come, you know, one of these days.
As always, I greatly appreciate the support!
This has been said before, and was covered by Snopes 13 years ago:
Dr. Leon Eisenberg: ADHD Is a 'Fictitious Disease'? (5/16/2013)
Rumor: Dr. Leon Eisenberg, the 'father' of ADHD, said just before his death that ADHD 'is a prime example of a fictitious disease.'
And what did the source that we have come to know as a top outlet for phony deboonking have to say about the claim more than a decade ago?
Mostly True
The writeup is really pretty good at covering the relevant history, providing numerous specific points of documentation. The real point is this....
This type of information can be available, and in fact can be acknowledged by the mainstream. But the masses don't operate by what information is available and acknowledged by the mainstream. That's not how it works.
They believe what it is convenient for them to believe at any given time. As Yuri Bezmenov pointed out, they are beyond the usefulness of exposure to authentic information. It's like trying to soak water into concrete.
Everyone reading this needs to get beyond these false preconceptions. Well then, what is one to do in this situation? It isn't clear, is it?
Now you're at least pointed in the direction of the real problem.
A thesis as to why the Deep State of the collective West is bent on the destruction of Russia would be quite long and would necessitate a discussion of topics beyond the scope of even the most adventurous conspiracy theorists.
Rather than undertake anything like that, I would suggest that any thesis put forward be evaluated to see if it accounts for an extraordinarily mysterious event that took place just over seven years ago aboard the Russian submarine Losharik.
We're told it was a fire in the battery compartment. This is not uncommon on submarines and they are well-ready to handle these nearly-routine mishaps. That's a cover story and it's total bullshit.
The first anomaly is the scale of the disaster on a crew which would nearly sink the boat from the amount of brass alone. The small sub has an estimated crew complement of 25, and:
Fourteen of the crew were killed by inhalation of smoke or toxic fumes. Seven of those who died held the rank of first rank captain and two were recipients of the Hero of the Russian Federation award. Submarine commander Denis Dolonsky was among those killed.... In comparison, submarine Kursk – which was lost with all hands after a similar disaster – had 118 crew members of whom only two held the rank of captain 1st rank.
It was a huge deal that no one wanted to talk about. The public in the West was--as mentioned--handed an absurd lie which was--as usual--accepted without the slightest question. The Russians did not want to talk about it either, but they kept their mouths shut rather than spew out bullshit.
Almost shut, that is, because statements and events belied how huge a deal it really was:
Dead sailors stopped a 'planetary catastrophe' aboard a secret submarine, a top Russian naval officer said at their funeral (Business Insider 7/8/2019)
"With their lives," the unnamed Russian officer said at a funeral in St. Petersburg, Russia, "they saved the lives of their colleagues, saved the vessel and prevented a planetary catastrophe." The Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, who said he was unaware of the officer's comments, denied that there was any risk of a broader threat.
The July 1 incident remains a mystery, as Russia has declared the details a "state secret." Peskov said last week that all the information about the submarine and its mission are classified at the "highest level," ABC News reported. Even the funeral was secretive, with many in attendance refusing to show their faces or identify themselves to attending media.
And back on the Wikipedia page:
On 5 July, four members were posthumously awarded Hero of Russia while ten members were posthumously awarded Order of Courage.
For a routine accident on a research sub? C'mon.
So what really happened? As I said, it's a very long story. But, again, the point is that whatever explanations are put forward for what the hell is going on with Russia that do not account for this incident can--in my book--be thrown out without further consideration.
PS: If anyone can work "Da Joos" into any of this I'd be shocked.
Thanks very much! I appreciate the support! There's a lot more to come.
And there's good news and bad news about that. The good news is that your pondering will be well-rewarded, and a lot more things in this world will make a lot more sense. The bad news is that there is so much material because these motherhumpers have been all over the map for a helluva long time.
The thing is, the sellouts and shills--nearly universally, to my guess--have no consciousness that they are sellouts and shills. Just like almost everyone else who opens their yap to air their opinions, they are smart and the big heroes in all this.
There is a more subtle litmus test, one reflecting the subconscious, something which is typically extraordinarily difficult to gain insight into. Ask anyone who saw the movie--shill or sellout or guy at the watercooler--something like this question:
In your opinion and your opinion alone, no right or wrong answer, do you feel that the movie, intentionally or unintentionally, subjected you to propaganda?
You see, I would say, "Yes, and further there is no question that it was intentional." Many others reading this would say the same.
For others, though, they will resist giving any answer whatsoever, even if you persist and press for a straight answer. In fact, it can be quite unsettling when you study them closely because they plainly cannot answer a plain question in a plain way.
So what's going on? The individual's subconscious is--as always--struggling for the most profitable answer. Further, it senses from the controversy and from the construction of the question that there may well be a trap which it is desperate to avoid.
The internal gears grind and various forms of nonsense and non-sequiturs come out of their mouths. Really, it's very much like that guy who gets AI chabots to spout nonsense in response to simple questions and requests.
The comparison is not spurious, which is precisely why it is so unsettling.
As one manifestation of this, everyone seems to have forgotten what charlatans are.
Unless they are told, of course. That's why Donald Trump is considered a charlatan, when for decades no one considered real estate development, writing books, and appearing on reality TV shows to be anything out of the ordinary.
But now we're reaching peak ignorance of the very concept of charlatan. I was just listening to the latest Higherside Chats podcast, which is considered by many as the top of the heap of conspiracy content.
The guest was Mark Burr, and it's like listening to a carnival barker for two hours. Everything out of his mouth is hucksterism. Seriously, he modulates his voice more than Krusty the Clown.
Greg Carlwood doesn't seem to notice any of this. Except that sometimes I hear the faintest hints of a growing tension inside him. His subconscious is telling him it's all bullshit but his conscious is telling him to consider his revenue model.
Maybe in another decade it'll spill over so that he will ask himself the question, "I wonder if--out my many hundreds of important and valuable guests--maybe a couple of them were disinformation agents deliberately sent to leverage me so that I would mislead or at least waste the time of my entire audience? Naw, couldn't be, could it?"
EDIT: The only resistance Greg shows is a couple of times when Burr implies something positive about Trump. That's because if Greg accepted that, it would mean he was wrong about many other things. The choice is clear.
And then she thought: how did they do it?
They were too complex, scholars argued, to have been achieved on a living person's own hair. The evidence they pointed to was the sheer scale and precision of the styles.
... the way individual hairs caught light, the way the tension distributed across a scalp.
... the seemingly impossible complexity of imperial Roman hairstyles became achievable.
Two thousand years of scholars looked at those statues and saw wigs. It took a hairdresser to look at them and see hair.
What I fear it may take another two thousand years for anyone to notice, yet is stated in that last sentence: that scholars were not looking at wigs nor was Janet looking at hair, but all were looking at marble.
That is to say, the intricate features distinguishing the design and construction of real hair from that of wigs was replicated by the creators of these statues in a level of detail so subtle as to go unnoticed for millennia yet of unerring reproduction. Who in their right mind would even bother?
I intentionally use the word "creators" rather than "sculptors" because the preconception that dudes with hammers and chisels stood around studying hair at the level of a professional hairstylist and carefully crafting the "impossible complexity" of the features and characteristics into stone... well, the idea sounds absurd when you type it out plainly. Which is what I have done.
And the SPLC has also switched auditors: it is now using the Atlanta-based firm of CRI (Carr, Riggs & Ingram, L.L.C.), whereas for many years it used Jackson Thornton & Co., P.C....
I added the bold to indicate Salem Witch names. What a shock that the auditors have never found and will never find any wrongdoing.
The Salem Witches have been behind what is conventionally but erroneously called the Social Reform Movement for nearly two centuries. It has always been the Social Engineering Movement. The SPLC is obviously right on brand.
Thank you very much! I really appreciate the support! Here's a special bonus to the bonus that I forgot to include (because it just never ends)....
Former President Bill Clinton's mother is said to be Virginia Dell Cassidy. I had always considered that as a reasonable middle name for a girl but now I'm not so sure about that. Not sure at all.
She was born in Bodcaw, Arkansas, in the southwest of the state and so towards Texas. Round Rock, home of Dell Computer and the annoying James Talarico is fairly far away, 325 miles, just north of Austin.
The thing is, do you know what's between those two locations? Elkins Lake in Huntsville, Texas. That was the longtime home of the man I suspect to be Bill Clinton's biological father, Colonel William Jackson Blythe, Sr..
Point is, it's extremely difficult to accept that all this "Dell" business is mere coincidence, amirite?
I believe this is more than something some sage came up with long ago, but is a reflection of the underlying functioning of human consciousness. That is, it's one thing to realize that sometimes metals stick to one another, and another to recognize and study the physical phenomenon of magnetism.
In this case, the misunderstanding is what the subconscious mind of the vast majority of humans is actually seeking. Everyone reasonably assumes that is something like "truth" or "facts and skills" or some such thing.
That would be quite rational but it is also incorrect. No one bothers verifying their assumption, of course. Rather, the mind seeks something along the lines of a psychic security or, to be more precise, an escape from fear and anxiety.
In the "beginner's mind", it is nearly impossible to avoid the idea that one is ignorant. No one around will believe a noob making up bullshit. Thus, the beginner seeks truth or facts or skills or whatever makes one cease to be a noob.
In the "expert's mind", the situation becomes reversed. Security is threatened by anything that challenges what that expert already "knows" to be true. Instead of searching for novelty, anomaly, and their own errors and ignorance, they seek only to reassure themselves that their superiority is intact.
The sages of old were correct but only through intuition, not explicit understanding. They understood the what but not the why. "Why?" is, of course, the question that nearly every child eventually gives up asking.
I forgot to mention the really outrageous one: Kleenex (IIRC) started making significantly smaller tissues, then put them in the same size external box with internal barriers so they wouldn't flop around. Who looks inside an empty Kleenex box?
That's some chutzpah.
The emerging official name for the phenomenon is "shrinkflation".
The most infuriating example I ever saw was in the familiar red and white metal boxes of McCormick ground black pepper. It has been sold for decades in the same iconic tin, but they dropped the contents from 4oz to 3oz. That and many other examples here:
Here We Downsize Again 2015 – Part 3 (Mouse Print 8/24/2015)
Well, I'm not objecting to or demeaning anyone thinking or saying that they're thinking. In fact, I encourage it.
The problem is that society has somehow lost the concept that this is speculation, or daydreaming, or fantasy, or delusion, and it has now somehow come to be considered "research" worthy of organized dissemination.
Moreover, that dissemination is to audiences composed nearly entirely of those wishing to hear only enthralling and fascinating fairy tales. They feed the ego because their conscious mind "knows the lore", while they never need feel fear because their subconscious mind knows it's all bullshit.
The phrase I take note of now is, "I think that...".
I really started noticing it after doing so much writing myself. Almost all of what I write is splicing together quotes and links. It takes a lot of effort and organization, but it was very important to me for it to come across as, "Well, you're seeing exactly what I'm looking at and you can make it what you will."
The phrase "I think" is prevalent in conspiracy-adjacent podcasts. That's because they have very little evidence to actually exhibit. You can mentally flag "I think" as an effort to manipulate your thoughts. Frankly, it's becoming more common to simply drop "I think" and state claims as if they were universally accepted fact.
Of course, the underlying problem is that no one demands evidence any more. I actually got criticized once on Reddit for providing links instead of just "saying what I thought". That's where we're at.
Weird coincidence: Kelly-Springfield was founded by Edwin Kelly and Arthur Grant. Just this morning I was researching a guy named Madison Grant.
Madison is famous for two things: conservationism and scientific racism aka eugenics. Both are Salem Witch initiatives for purposes of social engineering. The greenies are still going strong after a century. Eugenics, however, got a bad name and so They try to pin it all on Madison and Adolf Hitler.
Another famous Grant was President Ulysses S. Grant. You can trace both Ulysses and Madison (through a family called the Treats) to the founding of Connecticut. What a coincidence.
An even bigger coincidence: the father of Ulysses was Jesse Root Grant. His father was Noah D. Grant III. Noah's second wife and Jesse's mother was named Rachael Kelly.
I mean, c'mon, you can't even begin to make this shit up! Thanks for the links!
The disturbing conclusion I draw is that human consciousness is capable of recalling vivid first-hand experience of events which simply did not happen.
The mainstream minimizes discussion of the concept of "confabulation", and tries to make out like it's a handful of kookoo birds. I believe it is prevalent.
That sounds controversial but I think many (dudes, at least) will be able to regrettably recall one of more arguments with a female romantic partner in which she told you that you that you said or did something you definitely did not say or do.
It might be a "he said, she said" type of situation, but sometimes you might have been able to provide other evidence or reasoning to show that it was illogical or irrational or impossible that you did as she claimed.
Did that not settle the point? Not at all. You got the, "Well, that's the way I remember it" statement, as if personal recall controls Reality. Which statement, in itself, is a demonstration of the point that some people live in a reality partially or largely of their own construction.
How many people? Too long to go into, but I believe about 95% of the population. I also fear I am underestimating.
The crucial aspect of the "event"--whatever may have taken--is that it was connected to the same generational Satanist families that have been manipulating history for centuries.
I would say that the background of Jim Jones is not what we are told it was except that no researcher ever mentions it. That's how the important truths are hidden. This is that background in a post from two years ago:
"RRN" stands for the news site "Real Raw News". I first brought it up just a couple of posts ago in the Susie Wiles post. I discuss a bit about the site itself in that one.
I've been trying for probably five years to definitely disprove any of the very wild shit that gets written up there and have--thus far--failed. As one category, they name certain specific high-ranking serving military officers as being involved in the "White Hats", doing things like executing Deep Staters at Gitmo. If this was all just a bunch of bullshit, have none of these officers heard of it and told them to knock it off? Not so far.
Take another example: RRN reported Fauci's execution at Gitmo way back on 4/25/2022. Could his existence have been faked since then?
Well, I closely followed the case of CA Gov Gavin Newsom, who RRN also reported as being captured then executed. From my own research, they have indeed been faking his continued existence since then. He even got reelected.
So when Fauci has to appear live, he only repeats, "I plead the Fifth!", even to the most trivial questions, no matter how ridiculous and guilty it makes him look. Does it make more sense that that is how you instruct the body double for fear he, say, doesn't know Fauci's birthday or something like that?
Anyway, the material on RRN has finally come to at least a minimal intersection with the Salem Witch research, and you're seeing the analysis of that in these last few posts. Neither RRN nor the White Hats have any suspicion anything like the Salem Witches exist. That's not good news but there you have it.
Glad you're enjoying the posts! Much more "Election Special" material to come.