2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think the big secret surrounding Israel's nuclear arsenal is that it pretty much doesn't exist.

There used to be a trope in old 70's TV shows where a guy would threaten a dude with a bulge in his jacket pocket that concealed a revolver. Of course, you don't actually need a revolver if the other guy assumes you have one.

I believe that's what we have here. If you look around, there are a handful of analysts that suspect the same thing. When you carefully search for the specific concrete evidence of the arsenal, you find it's a mirage.

That being said, it's a long and untold story but they stole about 50 devices of 5kT each (from the US, of course) at the beginning of 2019. One of them was used on Port Said. They also appear to have discreetly used a few of them in the current war.

But the thing is, why would you need to steal a few very small nukes if you supposedly had a bunch of big ones at your disposal, and the capability of manufacturing any more that you need? It strongly implies the opposite.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks very much! If you like writeups on deeply wacky and sus connections, I've got some stuff stored up that I hope to get to soon.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Purim commemorates a genocide by the Jews, so at least they're keeping the spirit of it.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right, I think that's an excellent point.

Also, I think when the NSDAP founded the Ahnenerbe and that group started looking all around the world asking questions like, "Wait--who were the Aryans exactly? And where did they come from? And what what do we find in history when we start tracing back along their path?", and then they started finding answers to those questions, well, somebody somewhere said, "Okay, we gotta shut that shit down!"

Now the whole narrative boils down to "racial supremacists eugenically breeding a race of occult supermen". And people now "know" that for a fact.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, I'm going to have to study your Einstein post.

Actually, my first "love" was science, but a few years ago I realized that I was lucky never to have ended up with a career in mainstream science. I see how polluted and suppressed and inverted it has all become, and I'm sure I would have gotten deranged right along with it.

As to the muzzling of Einstein, you're not going to believe it (but maybe at this point it's somehow not surprising) but it connects to the Parkers one more time. I'm dead serious.

The Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation paid for an assistant (i.e. handler) for Einstein. That Macy family was connected to Nantucket and tied up with the Parker family all the way back in the late 1700's. Details and links are in a post I wrote just two days ago (freaky, right?):

Macy’s flagship store in San Francisco is closing, which is a bigger deal than you think (because the Macy family is part of the Small Club you ain’t in)

I already linked that post, but the occurrence of Einstein was (I thought) pretty trivial and purely incidental. If you noticed it there and that's.what put you in mind of Einstein, then it's not so freaky. Really, I kind of hope that's the case... lol. Hard to keep track of who said what to who and when.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Such strange and enigmatic doings are revealed when you start kicking over rocks, eh? It makes you think that all the blank spots of history that we all assumed were only boring people doing nothing of note is totally wrong.

I think the Hunter S. Thompson lead is a red herring. He's my favorite author and I have read a ton of his work. "They" have very subtly tried to blackwash him since his extremely suspicious "suicide". IMHO, he was smart, observant, and a gifted writer with a huge, dedicated audience.

I have come to understand that he moved to Woody Creek to be a sort of renunciate from the dark world he found he could do little to repair. Eventually, I believe he began waking up to the fact that the world was far darker than he had ever suspected. He began his career as a reporter, and I believe he felt himself to be a reporter all his life. His "gonzo journalism" was the best way he knew to convey the truth he found. The last stories he was working on were 911 and the White House Call Boy scandal.

Well, you can see how things are adding up here. Thompson eviscerated people he didn't care for, like Nixon, but we come to find Nixon was an errant clerk. What would Thompson have done with his talents against the real monsters? He had to go, and be left with a little stink around him so people looked no further.

As to good old Hunter, I would point you in another direction regarding his name, and it involves (you're not going to believe this) the Parkers yet again. I'm still trying to get around to writing up a post on the Parkers, but I'll hip you to this one connecting node.

The Parkers have been tied up since at least the late 1600's with a family called the Motts. For example, one of the nexus points is in the theft of the Kingdom of Hawaii. Study the page for the Overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom all you like and you won't see them mentioned, but you can separately study the pages for Samuel Parker (Hawaii politician) and John Mott-Smith and you see two key players in the event floating around. They erase history by breaking the easy connections. (BTW, Mott's page mentions guy named Elisha Hunt Allen. Can't make this up!)

Anyway, the Mott family are the same Mott's of applesauce fame. If you look in the sidebar of that page, you'll see one of the founders was "Jamotia Hunter". This Hunter is mentioned nowhere else on the page, and the sidebar mention is not a hotlink. Strange, right? Another broken connection.

Mott's was founded in Bouckville, NY. About an hour due west lies Skaneateles, NY. Turns out that's the birthplace of (drum roll)... Neilia Biden, Joe's first wife, born as (drum roll)... Neilia Hunter.

So Hunter's middle name is his mother's maiden name, which these Elites do all the time. These towns are both on the eastern side of the Finger Lakes area of New York, and we've all had the displeasure of seeing the Ugliest Tattoo in the World on Hunter's back. So whatever is going on in the Finger Lakes area, it already makes me never want to go there.

You'll have to take my word for it, but there's tons more connections with a family named the Coffins, the Finger Lakes, Nantucket, etc. So the little bit I just wrote up may strike as tenuous, but for me it all drops in like the perfect Tetris piece.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd actually never heard of that movie before but I'll have to watch it.

I glanced at the wiki for it and saw that Armie Hammer was in it. I asked myself, "Was that the guy that wanted to eat some lady's toes?" So I searched "armie hammer toes" and yes, he was that guy, but even before that result there was this:

Son Sucks Armie Hammer's Toes In Video And Critics Call Actor A Heel (HuffPo 7/29/2019)

FFS, every f-ing time with these freaks.

3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Might get some bread"... I love it! I'm going to use it in the future.

Actually, I write it this stuff up mostly to just instantiate it into the innerwebz, with the hope that someone somewhere sometime might stumble into it at just the right moment during a search.

Funnily enough, I actually confirmed the validity of that theory a while ago. I was searching for something--don't remember what--a reference I vaguely recalled and wanted to cite in a post. After a few searches, voila!, I found someone had written it up in a post on r/conspiracy.

It was just the writeup I was looking for. I was like four paragraphs in before I glanced up at the username and saw it was me... lol

3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks for the tip!

As I was taking a look at the link, I noticed they give the architect as R.H. Hunt. Clicking over to his page, the three sample photos they give of his work are all obviously Tartarian.

It reminded me of a video I saw a while ago about the old Crystal Palace in London (now destroyed, of course). They give credit for the magnificent design to Sir Joseph Paxton, but it turns out the guy was barely qualified to do lawn maintenance.

It turns out all the other work they credit to Paxton was also Tartarian, so he was just a sock puppet. I suspect we have the same thing with Hunt and, thus, that the Lookout Mountain Hotel was Tartarian. Whatever they tell us about the origin and history of the hotel, we can virtually guarantee it was something other than that, right?

I also happened to notice that Hunt was born in Elbert County. We all know what monument stood there until it was recently blown up by parties unknown. I always thought the location of it had no significance, but maybe that's not the case. It's a tiny place, and the population of the whole county even today is only 20k. The college I went to was almost twice the size (not the town, just the students).

But what seals the case for me is this: a "Notable person" of the county was Danial Parker. He was the son of Captain John Parker. I just yesterday mentioned that man in a post:

Macy’s flagship store in San Francisco is closing, which is a bigger deal than you think (because the Macy family is part of the Small Club you ain’t in)

That post got 7 upvotes and 4 downvotes. Okay, i get the 7 because not many people are interested in such long-winded talk. Don't upvote and don't read, right? But it also looks like parties unknown don't like when this type of material is brought into the light.

Anyway, thanks again!

5
Primate98 5 points ago +5 / -0

There's a disturbing shift taking place, along the lines of the old maxim, "If you can't cover it up, turn it up". We see an example of that here.

I think it's possible within a couple of years we'll see something like, "Of course the vaxx killed millions, and thank the AI God it did so and saved us from overpopulation!"

I say this is disturbing because we're dealing with vicious, cornered animals, and Their corner is getting smaller.

4
Primate98 4 points ago +4 / -0

To put a finer historical point on it, the very concept that "the Nazis burned books" is flatly untrue. I say this to emphasize how deeply this false "fact" has seeped into history. Some may have an immediate reaction to this if they just watched the video and saw Nazi officials and members of the SA standing around as books burned, but we need to take a closer look.

The Nazis, recognizing along with many others the corrosive and subversive nature of certain "literature", approved of the voluntary destruction of it. But beyond that, there is no documentation that the NSDAP:

  • published a list of books to ban
  • confiscated books
  • personally destroyed books or commanded their destruction
  • organized, directed, supported, or even encouraged any groups--such as the GSA--to do so

I never uncovered a single official document or publication from the NSDAP--let alone legislation--regarding the burning of books. All in all, the idea that "Nazis burned books" is about as erroneous and "Trump made everyone wear red hats".

In fact, I turned up the original prewar article about book burning from "The Guardian", and it seems obvious black propaganda by Western warmongers. You can get that link and others along with more discussion in this old post:

The nazis burned books while attempting to rise in power which is why I believe we need to become scribes and download important videos and print or archive every article you see as these will be wiped from the internet the same way it’s impossible to find 9/11 theories o

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

I appreciate you saying so, thanks.

There's a second-order point to this kind of content, which is that you can see how little engagement it gets. You don't even get people saying anything like, "I'm surprised to find out how long They have been around, how deep They are dug in, and how Their fingers are in everything."

So it informs my view of a topic like Trump's first term. People bitch and moan about he didn't "drain the swamp". I find it reasonable to think he waded in a bit and said, "I'm surprised to find out how long They have been around, how deep They are dug in, and how Their fingers are in everything." See how that changes the interpretation of events?

A third-order point explains why he says very little about any of this. Would he get a better reception airing this type of information among the general public than we see here, among supposedly knowledgeable, awake, hardcore conspiracy theorists? Not a chance in Hell.

Then again, can we discount the site shadow-banning when they really feel they need to?

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

desperate for attention? you can't stop replying, just like an npc whose buttons are getting pushed

lolololololol

oh wait shills get paid for engagement

1
Primate98 1 point ago +3 / -2

The trolls seem to be taking some effort, though, don't you think? So readers get to see not just the content, but the odd reaction of supposed "conspiracy theorists". That will indicate something to the aware.

Sometimes I wonder if such fools ever regret being so obvious. Probably not, as it requires a degree of reflective thinking.

-1
Primate98 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Your point?

Wait, wait... was this what you consider an attempt at wit? Well, we are laughing, that's for sure.

hahahahahaha

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you not notice yourself asking for it? Everyone that steps up to the counter and orders something gets served.

And people criticize NPCs.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

did you think i read anything else in the thread? who cares so much about eclipses?

you're gonna say, "you do! you replied!!!!!!!"

hahahaha go ahead and say it i command you

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you feel the compulsion to clarify, then by definition it was not clear at all, was it?

0
Primate98 0 points ago +1 / -1

In your analysis, an eclipse is to be likened to a hurricane? If that degree of insight is to be considered "stepping it up", I'll take a hard pass on it.

Maybe you should have backed up your "insight" with articles on the devastation caused by past eclipses.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +3 / -2

Jesus, and they always accuse the ancients of being superstitious about eclipses.

But I guess, yeah, if a dragon really is going to eat the Sun, then every dipshit is going to have to tweet about and will clog up the cell towers.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jack was just a minor player walking around the stage as part of the presentation, same as Crowley. "They" do that to keep you from from wondering who wrote the script, and thinking about who owns the theater. In this way, "They" stay invisible, in all practical terms.

The coverage of his exploits in mainstream productions is itself part of the presentation, as is forever embiggening his "legend" as an occultist. You're not supposed to think about who actually put together the linked video, but I sure did.

Thus, the Occultism in which Parsons was supposedly involved is virtually entirely a stage show. And since I have just told you about some things which are truly "hidden from the eye", we should now understand better what the "occult" truly is in this world.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting historical perspective: Most people would say it was Lincoln with his Emancipation Proclamation, and Lincoln was a Republican. Technically speaking, that proclamation freed exactly zero slaves.

In the Confederate states, where Lincoln had no power to enforce it, no slaves were freed of course. Well, he just couldn't do it then but he had the noble idea, right? Nope.

In the border states that remained in the Union, the Proclamation continued slavery there because Lincoln desired to cooperation of those states. No slaves were freed where he could have enforced it.

So for anyone that was aware that Lincoln was generally a scumbag but were giving him credit for freeing slaves, you can go ahead and drop that exception.

3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

Indeed, Wallace was insightful and spoke a little too plainly. That why they had to shoot him when he ran for President in 1972.

Too long to write up now, but there's an interesting historical note. Wallace was the "segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever" guy. After he got shot and was laying the hospital, he realized the error of his ways. He called local black leaders to his hospital room, asked forgiveness, and was given it.

IIRC this stat, correctly, when Wallace ran again for Governor of Alabama, he won with a higher percentage of the black vote than Obama did in his campaign for President.

All memory-holed, for obvious reasons.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

It really is an interesting point you bring up. There's sort of a parallel question which is: for all the hate directed towards various public figures, why hasn't anyone taken them out, or even suggested it in a less than joking way?

On one branch, you have liberals that detest Trump, and think that if he's reelected that will be the end of Western civilization or some such. I know they hate guns, but how has there never been a public assassination attempt? They sure are loony and violent enough, right?

On the other branch, so many awakened people are aware of the murderous outrages of Hillary and Gates and Fauci, etc,, yet no one has ever tried to take them out either. And these sentiments are supposedly held by the people that are gun nuts, too.

There are two general answers, I think. One s that people are victims of learned helplessness and too pussified to actually take any action. I would say, sure, that's part of the cause of what we see.

The other is that we're seeing real human nature, and properly functioning humans find violence abhorrent. They are repulsed by the idea, even when under lethal threat.

So I would summarize by saying, yes, tons of Assange supporters are just virtue signalling, but beneath that, there are many people that are still relying--rightly or wrongly--on all the various social institutions we have created over the centuries to peacefully resolve disputes.

A guy named Jeff Cooper said it in a bit of a different way, but when the time comes when a man has to leave his house and take direct action, it's a form of suicide to all that he had been up to that point.

view more: Next ›