Stanford University maintains a collection of just such maps:
Glen McLaughlin Map Collection: California as an Island
Apparently they are not laughing it off as you see the many geniuses on social media do. Perhaps they should contact Stanford to discuss it with them.
I'm pretty sure this is just a smoke screen, in the form of a fake limited hangout, to obscure the FBI's all-too-real Gestapo assault on anything and anyone resisting the Establishment Agenda.
At least for me, the fact that it's published by The Intercept confirms it. But if anyone wants something more solid, here's what you're NOT going to get from this controversy: anyone going to prison, anyone paying a fine, anyone getting fired, anyone having to go with their manager to have a formal talk with the HR lady, etc, etc. That's because it's fake, and only enemies get punished for fake things.
Fauci was executed some time ago, and this documentary was released to maintain the impression he;s still alive in people's minds.
Before anyone points out that the video clip is from 2021 ad will not prove to anyone that Fauci is alive in 2023, strict rationality is not the way They "prove" anything. Few have ever noticed, but proof is not how They manipulate minds.
I would suggest the audio was faked. Fauci would have never said that aloud, never said it in range of a microphone, and never got the shot. Notice how they just show B-roll as he said it? Even less effort than a DeepFake.
The last time Vince Foster was seen alive was in the White House on his way to the Rose Garden where the new FBI Director.was to be announced. Turns out it was Louis Freeh!
Because Foster was Deputy White House Counsel and he "committed suicide" in Fort Marcy Park--which is Federal property--his death was investigated by the FBI. Guess who the Director was? Turns out it was Louis Freeh!
Whoops, really gave away the answer, didn't I?
The Miranda requirement is already functionally useless. Don't ask me how I know this, but if the cops question you and then arrest you without notifying you of your rights, they just tell the judge, "Oh, that was just a field interview. We had no intention of arresting the suspect when it began." The Justice Machine just goes along with it.
Funny, I can't recall this being shown a single time in the movies or TV.
You asked whether Jesus quit. I am certainly in no position to cast any stones, nor would I in this case, but I think we can recognize that, yes, at some point it appears he decided to hang it up.
His followers would have fought to protect him and his message, of course. Even without that, he could have easily escaped Jerusalem and gone on to spread his teachings many other places. He declined both of these options.
Everyone is going to give their own reason for why he did that, almost all of them simply parroting what someone else has said about it. They may even just deny that he did it all.
The reason I bring all this up is that, to the very small extent to which I have tried to spread the truth, even truths that seem quite plain to me, I have found that very, very few are interested in the truth. So you can bang your head against a brick wall because there really is a non-zero chance you're going to bash it down, but after a while you get tired of it.
I recall what Jesus Himself said when he was talking about "ask and it shall be given you". People think it's a statement about God's generosity, but there's a subtle subtext that is universally missed: You see, what is stated is that a person has to ask, or seek, or knock. It doesn't happen automatically.
So look around and ask yourself, how many people do you really see asking, or seeking, or knocking?
Really, I was just a little shocked that (and yes, I know the bar is very low) the anons on 4chan were addressing it as if it was in any way real.
I suppose it's just another example of a principle at work I see time and again: "They" don't necessarily need to convince you of any particular falsehood, but only need do enough to keep you from the truth.
As weak-ass fakery as Uvalde was, Mission Accomplished!
You've actually hit on the main functional mechanism to manipulate people. That is, a great many people want to be "good", so the "authorities" simply instruct them as to what a "good" person says, feels, and does. Following those instructions is--definitively--being "good".
This is not the way a person with normal moral function works. That person tries to determine what is moral, then speaks, feels and acts accordingly, without regard for the opinion of the "authorities" or anyone else. The strongest of such people are willing to endure punishment for the sake of morality.
These can be hard to distinguish if you're not looking closely, but it's like two sides of the same coin: extremely close but entirely opposite and with a world of difference. Almost everyone assumes everyone else is like them. They are not.
A couple of random notes on concepts mentioned in this post:
marshalling government agencies, academia, Big Pharma, and NGOs, such as several financed by George Soros....
We have seen such combinations many times. What should be recognized is that we have gone far beyond WW2 levels of totalitarianism. Mussolini described fascism as the combination of corporate and governmental power. With increasing speed over the last few years, we have seen the rise of SuperFascism: the combination of all concentrations of power. Personally, I interpret this as a sign of weakness on Their part.
institutionalized the falsification of reality....
This is and always was the function of the "media". A Deep Thought I have found very valuable is that They told us that right in the name, but no one noticed. To the extent it crosses anyone's mind, "media" means something along the lines of "something that brings content to you", like a DVD or a sheet of paper. That's not at all correct.
The Latin word "media" means "middle". In this case, the "media" is in the middle between you and reality. They act as a shim between you and the vast majority of what you know about reality. You don't need to control reality when it's much easier to just tell people what you'd like them to believe it is. I encourage everyone to bring this understanding to mind whenever the word "media" is used.
FWIW< I'm of the firm view that Hunter Biden has been dead (from an overdose, surprise!) since before "Biden" was inaugurated.
I'm not interested in arguing the case for it with anyone, but I wish to simply bring the thesis to the attention of anyone who cares to weigh it against the available evidence and, if they find it valid, incorporate it into their own analyses.
There is a finer point here, confounding to the conclusion that the NPCs are peacefully accepting genocide. That is, we all witnessed how freaked out so many of them were at the possibility that they themselves could get sick and die from the Holocough.
This was far beyond any virtue-signalling, with which they are also obsessed. We must conclude that their instincts for self-preservation are still intact. Certainly, though, their understanding of the source and nature of actual threats to their existence are in many areas completely off the mark.
What does this say about the soul, the subject Steiner addresses? As I see it, the more immediate concept is consciousness. These NPCs seem to have a level of consciousness similar in nature to animals. That is, an animal can have a very high instinct for self-preservation, but can any animal be said to have a concept of genocide?
Finally, I feel there there probably is a relationship between what we call "consciousness" and what we call the "soul". What that may be I cannot yet say with any certainty. (And I must add that, frankly, I find it the opposite of helpful when people assert their speculations in this area as fact.)
What should be noted is that this "newly surfaced" video is from a forthcoming PBS documentary. Does it strike an odd note that this primary Establishment outlet promotes a video of "Science itself" wasting his time on a ludicrous propaganda stunt? It should.
RRN reported about a year ago that Fauci had been executed. Is this video consistent with that very out there claim? Yes, it is.
See, the vast majority will not notice that the video is from June 2021. Whatever the viewer may think of him, the image they see in March 2023 of Fauci alive and kicking is simply imprinted lightly on the surface of their mind. That reinforces the idea he's still alive and that is all that is required.
And what about conspiracy theorists, the only people that They have to worry about having suspicions about the true state of affairs? We see that, once again, they bite down the hardest on such tasty bait. Another chance to bash the evil little gnome? Yes, please! Well... see how it works?
Finally, maybe you're thinking, "I have a totally open mind, but what's written here is just some ridiculous bullshit I can reject out of hand." That's good, in a way, because now you know exactly what normies think about the things you say.
If anyone is wondering, Bindi is doing the "triad claw", with the middle and ring fingers together. Further, if anyone is thinking this is a natural and unconscious gesture, be sure to try it yourself. You'll find it feels very strange indeed.
And yeah, it seems like someone just made up a crazy bullshit story to account for some physical deformity Bindi has. But then you read something like this and it's harder to convince yourself it's quite the BS you thought:
Triad Claw Suggests Massive Satanic Jewish Conspiracy
It also seems really out of left field that such a rando pop entity like Steve Irwin would be involved in such a thing. But then you can look around and find analyses that Irwin is in reality John Denver, and that Denver faked his death. You also find that Irwin faked his death and is now back working with the same organization as a guy named Steve Backshall. Hang on, "Steve shall be back"? Okay.
Finally, for anyone that dismisses such ideas out of hand before researching and examining the evidence for yourself, that is precisely why you will always fail to understand the world. While you stroke your ego with thoughts of your high level of discernment, your own lack of imagination cripples you.
This is the latest in the innumerable examples that absolutely everything a Leftist says or writes comes with a giant silent/invisible asterisk at the end of it.
They simply do not have any principles they recognize and by which they limit their own behavior. We should all recognize that the neoliberals embody what Thucydides wrote so long ago: "The strong do what they will and the weak suffer what they must."
Good old Tyler Durden tips his hand once again as high-level disinfo. The misdirection begins here:
So when the FDIC decided to guarantee every depositor at Silicon Valley Bank, including those with balances exceeding $250,000, it means they’re bailing out SVB’s wealthy customers at the expense of big Wall Street banks.
Let's take a look at that: "at the expense of big Wall Street banks". He'd like us to have in mind that some financial Masters of the Universe are not going to get bonus checks as large as they otherwise would. Then he launches off into this very long and tedious bond discussion.
But the FDIC does not insure "big Wall Street banks", unless that's what you call the retail banks you use, your employer uses, and the weed shop across town would like to use. Part of the interest and fees and charges that they collect from you and everyone you know is used to pay the dues to the FDIC.
If there is a "special assessment" by the FDIC on it's member banks, where will that money come from? Will all the tellers and branch managers get half-pay for a month? Of course not. It's coming from you and everyone you know. It's not even limited to taxpayers, as a bailout would be.
Except then again, maybe taxpayers will get it too. The FDIC is a US Government corporation that is "backed by the full faith and credit of the government of the United States of America". They may have to wait another week until the heat really blows over to pull that one.
Anyway, thanks again, Tyler.
Don't miss Chapter 1 of his book "Tsar of the Slavs", where he sets out a compelling case that Jesus was born in what we call the year 1152 AD.
Prediction: Everyone disagreeing with this conclusion is in reality simply made too uncomfortable by it, and will find a personalized way to avoid exposure to the evidence. Well, this is not actually a prediction, it's just how human minds really work.
Just a couple of little factoids people who are analyzing the period of the "Babylonian exile" (when and where the Babylonian Talmud was written) should be sure to incorporate: only about 25% were ever deported to Babylon, and when "released from captivity", only 4% returned.