Alright,
So if you’ve been using the internet since the auts, you understand the underlying issues surrounding the “dead internet theory,” AI is generating 50%+ of all content, the “Big 4” (Meta, Google, Apple, Amazon) or however many, funneling content into ecospheres and walled gardens, etc.
The internet was once a fun place with many websites to visit daily and get new, fresh perspectives.
I used to enjoy sites like ign, gamespot, and many low budget websites ran by a devoted webmaster/mod.
Every website now is garbage. Ign and gamespot have so many ads your browser crashes. Then, the content is pure slop— AI generated, or low-effort. Next, it’s pure paid advertising posing as gaming journalism, as in the case of MIXTAPE scandal.
I used to enjoy the internet, but i stopped using facebook, insta, snap, google, in 2020 and never signed up for tik tok.
So, what i’m asking this small conspiracy minded community is—- where’s the good shit?
Any sites you visit on a daily basis with good stuff? Any substacks or telegram channels worth following?
I follow whitney webb, and james corbett… But anyone NOT uploading to youtube or out there on the mainstream sites? Any good foreign language news or info with english subs or dubs?
Most conspiracy shit is propaganda now, or self-serving like alex jones and his boner pills. I’m looking for autist level enthusiasts out there doing shit for the love of the game and risking it all for no reason….
But i’m looking for more.
I really like ArtChad on youtube.
Really, anything you got. Hit me.
Logic implies circular thinking (true OR false) which turns into a conflict of reason (true VS false) the moment one chooses to hold onto either side. The origin of logic implies logos (word of god)...yet not spoken by God but articulated in the name of God by whoever chooses to suggest it to you.
Any suggested word represents logos; you thinking about it represents logic; you fighting others about it represents reason.
Perception implies delineation aka all perceivable moving through each ones perception...no conflict; no circle; no word to hold onto.
Only within a line (implication) can a circle (reason) be shaped.
Hence mentally stuck within the following conflicts of reason...i am vs you are + pretty vs ugly + mine vs yours.
How could your logic (pretty or ugly) ever resolve the resulting conflict of reason (pretty vs ugly)?
Pre (before) dict (to show). Before implies "forwarded being" aka nature moving each living being from inception towards death. While alive...a being cannot perceive its inception or death.
Being implies in-between beginning and end, hence transferred from > to.
One can only perceive the apple on the tree; the apple falling or the apple hitting the ground...aka each instance apart (analysis); not together (synthesis).
If you synthesize your prediction about the falling apple hitting the ground; then you mentally hold onto an artificial synthesis, which permits another to exploit your ignorance by using analysis like picking the apple from above or catching the apple before it hits the ground. Exploiting ignorance represents a potential of free will of choice...a potential you ignore when binding your choice to a prediction.
Life does not need to predict death...life needs to adapt to the process of dying. Predicting outcome implies gambling aka ignoring given choice by taking a chance.
what do you call this way of thinking of yours? or philosophy? i still cant wrap my mind around it, it seems any thought would lead to logic or reason,which is what makes us human, no?
Call implies "to apply by way of designation"...the issue is apply (join; combine; attach; adhere). Applying tempts one to deny way (inception towards death) of design (life).
Whatever one applies...the way of design removes, because de-sign implies the division of sign.
Attaching any name to motion tempts you to ignore the movable (motion) for the immovable (name). Motion doesn't require the name "motion"; it implies mot (mote) ion (action) aka yourself as the mote (life) within action (inception towards death).
Any de-SCRIP-tion suggested to you tempts you to consent to a SCRIPT, which others then run within you. This represents the animation of an anthropomorphic being aka a golem/goyim.
Analyze it...phi (to love) lo (logic) sophy (to know; to perceive). Philo contradicts sophy, because phi (to love) and miso (to hate) are in conflict with one another. Your mind considering one or the other implies logic, and you choosing to hold onto one side while fighting the other implies reason.
Both logic and reason tempt you to ignore perception for suggestion aka reality for fiction aka that which moves for that which you hold onto.
I vs you + still vs moving + can vs can't + my vs your...that's what ones mind wraps as logic within and as reason around oneself.
Wrap; verb - "to roll or fold together; envelop, surround; cover and fasten securely, swaddle; fold up or back on itself"...that's what others tempt you to do to yourself.
Nature leads each beings life from inception towards death...logic and reason implies holding onto a misleading side, while being lead. The holding onto aka the consent; belief; faith; authorization; permission; sanction; license etc. required for logic and reason are draining ones potential to hold onto.
Only if potential (life) resists process (inception towards death) can potential grow. Taking a possession by choosing a side for logic and reason implies loss of potential.
HU (hue; color) implies light (motion) > spectrum (momentum) > ray (matter). Light generates a spectrum which differentiates each ray from one another, which each ray (race) perceives as the visible spectrum of light.
That implies a linear process...not a circular logic turning into reason. Same with MAN (motion) > woman (momentum) > offspring (matter).
The issue in your sentence...US aka "united states" aka artificially rolling together what nature delineates apart.