2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Has not given us (plural)...but one (singular)"

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be implies singularity; loyalty implies to natural loyal/legal/lex - "law"...not to one another. Few shape suggestions to tempt consent into dualism, hence into a dual/duel against one another.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

made invisible air visible

In (within) visible (perceptible to sight)...few tempt many to ignore this by suggesting that invisible implies "not perceptible to sight".

It's consenting to suggested words like "invisible", which prevents one from analyzing the implication of division. Consent implies synthesis...natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies division for analysis.

shock waves

Only agitated matter within calm motion can be shocked, and only within a line (inception towards death) can a wave be raised (life).

heat

Only during a cooling process (dying) can heated potential (living) come into being.

turbulence

Division of nature into being implies tranquility...commotion among being implies turbulence.

nothing but a light and a razor's edge

Few suggest nothing (nihilo) to tempt many into nihil-ism and de-nial of everything perceivable aka as living within the edge of knowing as a particular ray (matter) within the visible spectrum (momentum) of whole light (motion).

Sleight of hand... https://genius.com/Aerosmith-livin-on-the-edge-lyrics

  • There's something wrong with the world today
  • I don't know what it is
  • Something's wrong with our eyes
  • We're seeing things in a different way
  • And God knows it ain't His
  • We're livin' on the edge

block the refracted light

Coming into being within nature implies the refraction of light...ignoring perceivable for suggested represents the block.

density becomes color

Become implies "coming into being"...only within light (motion) can color (momentum) come into being (matter), which implies diffusion; not density.

Ignoring how all perceivable diffuses each ones perception, by consenting to any suggestion, establishes density within oneself.

Too close to the aether?

a) Aether (motion) > spirit (momentum) > essence (matter)

b) TOO CLOSE implies essence holding onto one another; TO implies spirit moving towards essence thereby animating it; THE AETHER implies God (theos) moving (aether) spirit through essence.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

MASSIVE Global weather warfare

Globe implies a mass, yet a mass can only be shaped during a pass. Only if motion passes matter can matter be amassed into a globe.

As for weather warfare...if weather implies direction of wind; then confining weather within a circle (globe) establishes warfare aka two sides waging war against each other during a linear fare (journey; ones passage in life).

Notice that few can only control the weather if many are distracted by warfare aka logic (inward circle) and reason (outward circle).

Furthermore...reconsider solar wind (linear) generating globe (circular) while causing disturbance.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

jews are at the end of their ropes

Rope/reif - "ring"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rope

a) A jew shapes a ring inside (logic) and outside (reason) of gentiles by tempting free will of choice into a consensus. Joining any consensus implies the rope aka ones attachment to another aka the string one attaches to self while permitting another to puppeteer.

b) Nature implies linear progression (inception towards death) of being (life)....logic implies circular thinking turning into circular conflicts of reason. A circle can only be shaped within a line by holding beginning and end together, thereby representing the mythological ouroborous.

There can never be an end to nature...only beginning (inception) and end (death) of each being (life) within nature.

jewish propaganda is realistic.

a) A gentile willingly choosing to hold onto jewish propaganda establishes fiction within reality.

b) Propaganda implies "cause to multiply"; nature generating being implies "cause to divide"...a jew suggests propaganda to invert the perception of each gentile into gentiles multiplied by consensus.

Example: Believers represent a consensus of gentiles... individually consenting to jewish propaganda.

jewish Rabbis call the shots

Rabbi/rabh - "master"...it's ones consent to any suggested call by another which implies slave establishing master by taking a shot.

A jew becomes a rabbi only when a gentile shoots himself, like for example the onlyfans rabbi being established by gentile fans shooting their loads to suggested whores.

that's a fact

Fact implies F(icticious)ACT. Everything acts; each thing reacts...calling out facts to one another establishes a fiction within reality.

Rabbi is the most evil person

If Rabbi implies "master"; then choosing a side (most vs less + good vs evil) makes one person a slave to a conflict against other persons. It's the slaves entering conflicts against each other which permits anyone outside to be the master over both sides fighting.

Example: a slave believes boxing represents winner vs loser; the master suggests the ring within which two losers fight each other about who loses less, while waiting for the master to declare the winner from outside the ring.

Theoretically speaking

Only within sound (praxis) can speech (theory) be shaped. A jew practices within sound while tempting gentiles to theorize within speech. The former represents operative masonry; the latter speculative masonry.

If you take out ALL

All gives (inception) and takes (death) each one (life)...a jew tricks gentiles to give up (to sell) self by taking (to buy) from one another.

A jew establishes a marketplace within everything where gentiles are buying and selling "nothing".

he is the framework and embodiment of evil

Work (motion) frames (momentum) body + mind (matter)...good vs evil enslaves mind (logic) and body (reason) within material conflict.

jews are lately screwing up left and right.

Left and right cannot be screwed without bringing imbalance to choice in-between. It's choosing to hold onto a side which screws one.

Life cannot perceive its inception and death, because SIDES represent fiction, while ones SIGHT in-between represents reality.

willing to destroy the whole

The destruction (division of structure within action) of whole gives each partial within free will of choice.

Elimination of occupying

Eliminate aka ex (out) limine (threshold) implies nature moving being out (life) of threshold (inception towards death)...which cannot be occupied (taken into possession) since it moves.

the jewish problem would be completely

Complete implies "finish together"; problem implies "thrown forward"...nature throws each being forward, while a jew suggests gentiles to seek artificial completion.

gone forever

Aka ever forward (inception towards death) for each one (life) going within...it's a jewish trick to make gentiles believe that "gone forever" represents vanished from existence aka cast into nothingness.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

To a psychopath people are only means to an end.

There can be only one psycho (animating spirit) path (passage way) towards end for anyone coming into being within. It's using the word "psychopath" for psychoanalysis aka to measure others, which establishes a consensus among people. It's ones consent to any consensus which represents the taking into possession of meaning.

In nature...spirit animates each person during the way of passage. A people represents an artificial construct aka a lumpenproletariat as in lumping together animated progeny.

People who think...

...imply each person lumped together within a consensus of thought shaped by another. A hivemind doesn't think...it tanks thought.

Ultimately, the Rothschild satanic families

Ultimately, God...and nothing else.

It could be they want it (israel) destroyed

Nature destroys; being needs to resist want as to be able to build during destruction. Israel aka yisra'el (he that striveth with God) implies each beings struggle in needing to resist wanted temptation.

at some point

Point implies end of sentence; being implies sentenced at inception towards point of death. Summation (some) of being shortens the sentence of each.

either way

There can be only one way...forwards.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've been telling people (plural)...

...while ignoring person (singular)

to this date the only one...

...was oneself; the singular being resisting the temptation of plurality. You represent the one willingly stepping out of the deception, while trying to get others to follow you, yet following isn't a strength of ones will, but the weakness of joining the will of others.

The power of a chosen one is based on how many are following; the power of ones choice is based on discerning the inversion aka ONES CHOICE / CHOSEN ONE...only then can one choose to resist the temptation to follow another.

don't want to lose

Lose isn't a want vs not want option, but the needed origin forwarding ones wanting will. Being implies growth (life) within loss (inception towards death). No matter if one wants or not wants to lose life...one needs to.

universal and resounding

Resounding implies ones response to all sound; universal implies one turning against one another within all.

Uni (one) vers (to turn) al (all)...that turn hidden within the crafted spell represents the deception turning one from all against each other. A jew suggests universalism to deceive the singular gentile into a plurality, which is how each jew becomes the "master of the universe".

consider themselves "rEd PiLLeD"

Consider (siding together) aka red vs blue siding against one another within the same inward (logic) and outward (reason) circle...representing the mythological ouroborous eating its own tail.

bRoKe FrEe FrOm MuH tHe MaTriX

Only within the matrix/matri (mother) can one be free by breaking apart (off-spring) from one another. Where's the father? THE aka theos (god)...

giving up their own children

Off-spring implies separation from one another aka seed (male) through soil (female) for fruit (off-spring)...nothing within that process can be owned.

A jew suggests buying and selling to trick gentiles into selling self out by buying into anything to gain ownership over it. Doing that represents the artificial (possession) inversion of natural (procession).

It's procession (inception towards death) which sets potential (life) free from one another.

freedom in exchange for security

Free (life) within dominance (inception towards death) implies ones expression within all change (ex-change)...which isn't secure (free from danger); but unsteady (free withing danger).

Only DANGER (dying) is secure, while the AUSTERE POWER (living) struggles within... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TH_JRjJtNSw

don't try to drag me

It's ones attachment to any suggestion of another which drags one across perceivable. The natural trial implies choice (life) balancing in-between push (inception) and pull (death).

love triangle

Love vs hate implies dualism...it's a chosen one suggesting the -ism who gains triangular control over the angles of conflict with the help of compass and square (freemasonry).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

ditch your smartphone

How dumb must ditching something smart feel to the many who willingly consented to the suggestion "put a mask over your mouth and nose"?

every single one will be configured...

Con (together) figure (to form) contradicts each beings singular free will of choice given. Any configuration suggested tempts ones free will of choice to artificially take and hold together what nature sets apart from one another.

Nature scatters being...few artificially configure scattered beings into many aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together). Why? To distract many with the burden of holding together an ever collapsing configuration of artifice (tower of babel allegory) while ignoring natural animation of being.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) Nature doesn't poly/pere - "to fill" itself with being...nature offloads each being from one another, hence giving each being free will of choice.

b) The opposite of poly (plural) implies uni (singular)...each jew tempts gentiles together into a plurality; which nature offloads, while giving each jew singular advantage (free) over disadvantaged (bound) gentiles.

c) Market/merg - "boundary, border" implies ones free will of choice binding self to another aka uni (ones choice) joining poly (consensus).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Quakers - the origin of today's leftism?

a) Motion implies the origin of balance (left/right) for each matter given choice within.

b) -ism implies a consensus among choices who chose one side (leftism) over another side (rightism) or vice versa. Choosing to hold onto either side implies imbalance (left vs right).

c) An imbalanced choice "shakes; trembles; shudders; violently convulses; frightens" aka experiences the tremulous agitation of a quake.

d) "And so terrible was the sight, that Moses said, I exceedingly fear and quake" ~Hebrews 12:21

Choosing to let go of fear stabilizes choice within balance. Few shape signs to tempt many to hold within sight what they love or fear.

e) Quakers aka Society of Friends implies the establishment of friend vs foe aka love vs hate aka hope vs fear aka right vs left conflict ...if one chooses to join together (soc) within (i) all (al).

The opposite of social implies "personal; private; special; particular; unique; diverse etc."...it's choosing one side over another which tempts many together under few.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

ban all porn and parasitic social media, they are all profiting from misery.

Misery seeks company. Porn and social media tempts one to join, hence deriving profit by transaction. If nature moves; then temptation cannot be banned.

The restrictions will expand.

Free will of choice isn't restricted unless one chooses to join another aka ones consent to any suggested temptation by another.

social credit scoring

Social aka together (soc) within (i) all (al) requires ones creed (credit) to join together, which in return permits another to score/sker (to cut).

Nature dividing each being from one another implies the natural score aka Gods divination...it's ignoring that by joining together which establishes the artificial score aka the collective flock of gentile sheep, herded by each jew who banks creed/credit and who mediates social society by central banking.

facebook

A book binds each reader in-between covers...a face freely expresses unless concealed from within. Even when concealing...facial expressions can be read from outside like a book.

life log

Life was set free...not locked in. Consenting to any suggestion implies logging into a restriction upon life.

DARPA

ARPA(c)DARPA?

Tech Plans For Tracing

Holding onto tech (artifice) during plan (level or flat surface) leaves a trace...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

what a weird war!

Engagement (engaging mind) as controlled environment (encircled mind)...soldiers engaged in conflict are both individually (logic) and uniformity (reason) confined by mind-control.

Entering as a spectator into any of these so called wars also puts oneself into mind-control by another.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Room/reue (to open; extent) + ball (phonetic ba'al)...

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s a tranny, you idiot.

That's operative masonry distracting from speculative masonry aka the magician making the switcheroo, while the obnoxious bimbo with the fake tits distracts the audience.

replaced

In nature..one responses to being placed. A jew shapes fiction to establish replacement within the mind of gentiles...in this case gaming/gambling.

Gambling implies TAKING chance by GIVEN choice... corrupting the rhythm game given tempts players to take to gambling without the propaganda aka "just let me play the game".

real words

Translation aka trans (across) lat (to carry) ion (action) implies nature carrying being from inception across death...a transference of essence.

Real vs fake corrupts the transference of essence with a circle aka circular thinking (logic) turning into conflict (reason) based on words (logos).

There are no real words...only ones response (re) to all (al) sound aka the vandal (wanderer) responding to rhythm (flow).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

The jews have subjected humanity to eternal slavery

Slavery implies slave subjecting self to master by free will of choice.

lied to you

A lie doesn't work if one doesn't believe it to be true by free will of choice. Holding onto truth represents the foundation for lies. That which one takes into possession permits another to take possession over one.

The truth a gentile holds onto permits each jew to anthropomorphically animate (shape a golem) through lies. If a gentile holds onto truth; then a jew is free to shape lies...cause it's the gentile who binds free will of choice to truth, while the jew uses free will of choice to freely wield the strings attached to the minds of gentiles.

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Rhythm game...localizers commit their usual vandalism

Rhytm/rhein - "to flow"...ones local position needs to be adaptive to change. Trying to hold onto localization, while ignoring change, destabilizes ones position.

What the vandal/wandljaz - "wanderer" does is distracting others from change by making new look worse than old.

The reality underneath the deception...rhythm (inception towards death) generates vandal (life). The jew tricks gentiles to hate vandals while loving rhythm.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Energy makes it move = God makes it move = Movability makes it move = tautology

a) Energy aka en (within) ergos (work) implies an internal differentiation, which tauto (same) logy (logic) contradicts.

b) EN implies matter; ERGY implies motion...only within motion can matter come into being.

c) God implies the whole of IT (partial) aka all motion for each matter within.

d) Movability implies being enabled by motion.

Feynman the jew suggests gentiles that energy implies nothing....an inversion of reality into fiction. Then the not so fine man suggests gentiles to take things apart to learn how they were put together, while tricking them to ignore that consenting to a suggestion implies artificially putting together what nature sets apart from one another...perception.

The textbooks supplied by his fellow jews represents the problem to distract gentiles from another jew supplying the solution aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by putting together).

Nature isn't about putting together, but about discerning self as part within the natural process of separation.

8
free-will-of-choice 8 points ago +8 / -0

Check out E. Michael Jones - 'Abu Ghraib and the American Empire' for more info about modern legalized torture originating from Israel; its outsourcing through the American Empire and its ties to the lust for domination (libido dominandi) within feminism.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Humanity will lose, God will win

a) Only during loss can there be human growth.

b) God gives will...winning or losing implies taking a chance, while ignoring free will of choice given.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Calling someone...would qualify as an attack

a) Calling implies "asking for"...attacking implies "giving an answer".

Example: If I attack you while telling you that you asked for it, then will you accept that?

b) There's only one quality (God given)...the conflict in-between qualify vs disqualify isn't God given, but shaped by taking a side in ignorance of God.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Christianity and communism and dei are not the same thing.

Many under few while excluding anyone who resists joining.

Abraham (one who has crossed over into knowledge of God)

a) Ab (father) raham (multitude)...there can be only one father moving each single one within across.

b) Knowledge implies all known and each one at the ledge in-between, hence being moved across, while standing within the crossroad of choice.

the Most High God

God implies the above and the below for each one in-between. If God is only the most high, then what's the foundation for a being to stand upon?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is worse? A false dichotomy, or not.

a) Dichotomy implies "divided into two"...better vs worse + true vs false implies "turning against one another".

b) Not (nihilo; nothing) implies ones denial of everything (cause) dividing each thing (effect) from one another.

c) The origin of nihilism represents jewish creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing), which when consented to...tempts gentiles into a dichotomy against each other.

ultimately physically damaging

Ultimately implies "coming to an end", which for each being within nature represents physical and mental damage.

universally available...readily access

Inception implies nature giving being readily access to life...universally implies ones within all turning against one another, which represents an artificial conflict tricking participants to make each other unavailable within nature.

Age verification

A being cannot perceive its inception...so age cannot be verified. Verification implies artificial conformation of natural dissension aka dis (to divide) sentire (sense).

Verification implies the falsification of SENTIENCE...if willingly consented to.

laws meant to limit

Natural law sets being free...holding onto any suggested meaning limits a beings free will of choice.

Cut the Gordian knot

Gordian (guardian) knot (not; nothing)...if a gentile denies reality for fiction, then each jew becomes the gordian of knot aka guardian of nothing.

The solution to the paradox is to ban...

A solution flows (inception towards death) and dissolves any problem formed (life) within. Paradox implies two contradictory problems in conflict against one another, while ignoring the dissolving solution.

to ban porn

a) Porn from pornē (to buy) and perə (to sell)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/pornography

Buying anything by free will of choice sells ones choice to a chosen one.

b) Ban/bannan - "to summon, command, proclaim" implies any jewish suggestion tempting each gentiles free will of choice into selling self out by buying into it.

The root of ban/bha - "to speak" implies the articulation of words within natural sound, which is how a jew crafts the spells to bind free will of choice among gentiles.

won “free speech”

Both reasoning (win vs lose) and articulation of natural sound (speech) bind ones free will of choice if consented to.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Freiwillige Selbstkontrolle (FSK)

a) Freewill selfcontrol

b) "There is no legal obligation for approval by the FSK; "HOWEVER, members of the SPIO commit themselves to only releasing productions passed by the FSK"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freiwillige_Selbstkontrolle_der_Filmwirtschaft

c) "After the nationalization of the film industry by the National Socialists and the dissolution of the association in 1933, the SPIO was re-established in Wiesbaden in 1950"... https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spitzenorganisation_der_Filmwirtschaft

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Replacement migration is a conspiracy theory

The ment (mind) in replaceMENT implies theoretical...it's the migration of bodies which makes it practical. The conspiracy is about distracting mind and body from migration/migrare/mei - "to change, go, move".

The migrants are being physically herded into confinement, while the natives are being mentally confined through the fear of change.

UN

Uniting nations implies artificially mixing together what nature divides from one another. To make that mix happen...body (migration) and mind (replacement) have to be unified.

Sleight of hand: "There's not a problem that I can't fix 'Cause I can do it in the mix"

Replacement Migration:Is it A Solution

Only within a solution can one respond to place of mind (replacement) during change (migration)...

Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations

The closer together...the faster the decline and aging among beings. Nature doesn't populate; nature departs being.

view more: Next ›