that lasted hundreds of millions years until unknown event
As if anything lasting hundreds of millions of years could be known...
air conditioning is unnatural
Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies the division of each one within all from one another...condition implies one subjecting self to another by means of stipulation (contract).
The contract for air-conditioning implies the house/haus - "hide"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/house aka hiding from natural air, while artificially mimicking it with air conditioning. The more one stays hidden; the less of natural revelation one receives.
Nature reveals all (perceivable) through each one (perception)...few utilize suggestion to tempt many into hiding from revelation. Ones consent to any suggestion of another represents the stipulation (contract) establishing the condition.
Ask yourself a) What's the house of God? and b) What's the nectar of God?
- Symptom aka sym (together) ptom (to fall)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/symptom
- Disease aka dis (to divide) ease (to throw)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/disease
Nature divides each being from one another thereby putting each at ease; few tempt many together to shape symptoms for disease. Proximity shapes ease into disease.
stone
Aka Stein...specifically Silverstein.
Einstein's unified field theory
"In physics, a unified field theory is a type of field theory that allows all fundamental forces of nature, including gravity, and all elementary particles TO BE WRITTEN in terms of a single physical field."...only within a singular line of motion; can matter write any plural conception (theory).
One cannot unify an open field by enclosing it into a plural theory without binding oneself (singular) to another (plural). The written has to be shared by contract aka consent (reader) towards suggestion (writer) aka buying vs selling. That's not natural...it's a fictitious scheme.
concave. Inside the egg.
Egg implies the body (matter) formed in the females (momentum) of all animals (motion)...using the word con (together) cave (to swell) tempts one to ignore that motion sets matter apart from one another. Few tempting many together represents the con-cave deception.
As for the conflict in-between concave (incurved) vs convex (outcurved)...only within a flowing line can a curve come in (inception) and out (death) of form (life).
Freeing oneself from the deception of con (together) cave (to swell) implies "scrambling egg" aka scramble; verb - "make one's way by clambering, struggle or wriggle along," also "strive with others or jostle and grasp rudely for a share or for mastery"
Interesting then...
Interest/interresse (to make a difference) from INTER (internal; within; in the midst of) ESSE (essence; to be)...that's how God derives being aka if God; then internal essence.
God, who Creates
Create/ker - "to grow". Only the created can grow (life) within the loss (inception towards death) provided by God making a difference.
If God could grow; then that would imply into more than god, which contradicts EL > ALL. All has to divide first to allow (all low) each one within to grow. Growing also implies a secondary reaction...not a primary action.
Created the vibrations
TION (action) implies all of God...VIBRA (moving to and fro) implies each one within. Putting God outside of vibration ignores God (tion) internalizing (vibra) through vibration.
the sound the vibrations make
THE (theos; God) implies sound/sanus (whole; entire; all aka el). It's all sound acting (tion), which makes each instrument move to and fro (vibra)
the sound the vibrations make, perhaps by His Speaking
Sound > vibration > speech > noise...if you write that vibration makes sound; then you refer to acoustic/kous - "to hear" aka ones response within all sound after the division of tion into vibra.
God implies natural...speech implies articulation within natural, hence making noise within the sound of silence.
Since speech tempts one another to hold letters; words; meaning etc. together...natural vibration can be abused for artificial destruction aka rhythm like the rhymes of hip-hop by BUSTA Rhymes flipping the mode (flipmode) or the history which rhymes or the idiom "no rhyme; no reason" implying that reason equals rhythm, which is why conflicts of reason are being orchestrated into theaters of war.
Interesting...There is no in-between
The first sentence starts with essence (est) in-between (inter)...the next sentence contradicts it. Took you one sentence to shape a circle; girl...
There is no in between was and is
THERE implies a differentiation to HERE...one can only be in-between here and there.
the One outside
Only in-between IN (inception) and OUT (death) can ONE (life) choose a side.
He is always in Being
Aka all way (inception towards death) for each being (life) within. That's how he (motion) moving through she (momentum) generates off-spring (matter).
You're introducing new definitions for nearly every term
a) "The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no NEW thing under the sun." ~Ecclesiastes 1:9
b) The word "introduction" represents a synthesis of intro (inward) duc (to lead) tion (action) aka action leading inward into reaction. The actual process of action leading into reaction implies an analysis...not a synthesis. It's your consent to the suggested word, which inverts analysis into synthesis within your mind.
c) The word "term" implies boundary; end... https://www.etymonline.com/word/term
Few suggest terminology to confine many within the boundary of logic by choosing one side (new) over another (old). Choosing either puts both sides in conflict against each other which is called "reason".
d) A word can only be shaped within sound...holding onto a word based DEFINITION makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound).
Furthermore...DEFINI (affixed) contradicts TION (action) making the word definition a contradiction in terms.
Definitions....God, action, reaction, truth, knowledge, will, capacity, identity
a) If one defines God; action; reaction; knowledge or will; then one ignores the implied motion.
b) Truth implies holding onto something; capacity implies ones memory allowing one to hold onto something; identity implies ones ignorance of perceivable differences by mentally slapping identity (sameness) upon it.
you haven't argued why those definitions should be accepted.
An arguing mind implies a reasoning mind aka acceptance versus denial, with versus/verto - "to turn" implying an artificial circle shaped within the natural line (inception towards death) of progression.
How does one argue? By using free will of choice to choose one side over another...doing so binds ones free will of choice into a conflict.
So why would free-will-of-choice willingly bind self to a conflict in-between acceptance and denial?
Instead of accepting any synthetic definition; I use analysis to break apart de-fini-tion (division of finite within action) or ac-cept (to take) or de-nial (division of nothing)...that's how one sustains a sound mind free from synthetic definitions suggested by another.
Most of your conclusions
Few shape many into a most vs least conflict of reason by tricking them to join each other, which establishes con (together) clude (to shut)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/conclude
One shuts self when joining together with others, because proximity restricts expression.
If solution (inception towards death) generates dis-solution (life); then conclusion shapes congestion.
Could you state your argument in premise-and-conclusion form without redefining common words?
a) Argument implies a circle (versus)...that's the conclusion shutting one mentally (logic) and physically (reason) off from linear reality.
As for premise aka pre (before) mise (to send)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/premise That's God sending each being forwards....not a circular conclusion, but a linear solution.
b) Being within God implies partial within whole...few suggest words to shape a COMMON consensus among many who ignore that.
Com (together) mon (to change)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/common contradicts that change applied to togetherness sets apart.
Whatever artifice one builds together; nature sets apart. Whatever one wants to hold onto; one needs to let go of. As above (life); so below (inception towards death). Whatever goes up; has to go down and vice versa.
tl;dr: tempting many to hold onto artificial definitions, while ignoring natural motion...that's the conspiracy theory few are running. I break definitions apart to expose ignorance to motion...ignorance doesn't like change at all. Ignorance wants to hide from change.
You are equating will with desire
Equate/equal implies God...the will to desire and resisting desire implies being at odds with one another.
God supplies equal balance for each ones free will of choice struggling within the odds of desire for one another.
Desire belongs to the ego
The ego moves through each one...any belonging tempts one to ignore that for the desire to possess.
The corruption of ego from "self" into "I" is based on taking possession over oneself as "me; myself or I".
Will is the capacity to act.
a) Only God acts...anything within RE-ACTS to being enacted upon. Will aka "want" reacts to enacted "need".
b) Capacity aka "the ability to contain" implies balance enabling choice to want to hold onto, while ignoring the need to let go of.
God implies process; being implies potential...capacity reduces potential if held onto.
If truth is known
Knowledge moves through one; truth and false represent choices held onto. Knowledge delineates; truth vs false implies circular confinement.
God implies all knowledge (perceivable) for each one (perception) within aka process dividing potential aka cause dividing effect aka need dividing want etc.
action should follow
Action generates reaction...reaction (life) needs to resist the wanted temptation to follow action (inception towards death).
Few suggest leaders to tempt many to follow...doing so inverts action > reaction.
competing desires
Competing desires implies reaction vs reaction, while ignoring action. Versus/verto (to turn) implies a circle; while action implies the delineation of reaction.
Temptation is simply conflict
The ATION (action) in temptation isn't in conflict with anything, but implies God enacting reaction. TEMPT implies reaction ignoring all action for one another aka need for want.
Conflict implies friction...reaction cannot have friction with action because action (motion) divides (momentum) reaction (matter) from one another. Only reaction (matter) turning against reaction (matter) can have friction with one another.
mistaken identification
Identical implies "same"...difference (creation) cannot take sameness (creator) only mistake one another.
Few suggest Identitarianism or equality through diversity to tempt many to consent to identities...thereby ignoring to be a difference within sameness for becoming alike one another. That's a mistake.
God implies the only identity (sameness) of each being (difference). A being does not need to identify oneself to one another...it's a wanted vs not wanted desire to do so.
The first mystery of the first episode: "Shannon Davis died in a riding accident. Shannon's husband had purchased secret insurance policies totaling $330.000"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CM9OlU8A1RU
a) Riding accident/accidere (to fall) implies riding (life) the fall (inception towards death) aka the process within which each rising life dies.
b) Purchase implies taking hold of that which is being set forth.
c) Insurance implies holding within that which is being set forth.
d) Policy implies the way of management by a written insurance agreement...if one consents to any suggestion of another, then ones mind agrees to permit another to manage ones mind, based on what one took hold of (purchased insurance).
e) Totaling $330.000 implies that the total is as above (3) so below (3) aka the TOT (death) of each (life) within AL (inception towards death).
he gave us a will free from his
He frees each ones will from one another. God implies need; will implies want. One needs to resist wanted temptation, while being tempted to ignore resisting.
organizing your life around conspiracy theories
Life implies the organ of delineation aka a disorganization from one another...tempting life into inertia (around) represents the conspiracy theory.
On a scale of 1-10
Scale/skel - "to cut", hence all balance (level) splitting into each choice. 1-10 implies counting aka reckoning together what was divided before.
Instead of arranging self onto levels of a scale...try discerning self as the center of scale while balancing in-between sides.
avoiding
The only void within nature represents ones ignorance of natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion) because suggestion voids perception if consented to.
stacking gold
Stacking implies the tower of babel aka whatever one stacks (as above) falls down (so below) because nature moves. Gold implies malleability aka the capability of being shaped or stretched by pressure, which implies the same value before the stacking; during the stacking and after the fall.
The issue with stacking gold...the one stacking gold isn't malleable, so the fall of the stack is going to massively devalue one, while permitting another to easily scoop up the gold.
gold; silver
Gold implies malleability; silver implies resonance...neither of which can be held onto. Mentally discerning this allows one to physically benefit from those who ignore the malleability of gold and the resonance of silver by holding onto suggested values.
stacking crypto
That implies stacking corpses within a crypt aka a mass grave...it's a trap to TETHER oneself to a BLOCK CHAIN.
spiritual warfare
Spirit implies the fare aka the passage; pass-over of each spiritually animated essence. War implies a circle shaped within the passage by essence turning against each other.
moving to a good location
Ones location implies the center of all motion...moving towards good or bad implies pivoting from center towards circumference, while turning both sides into a war against each other.
to survive
TO implies "towards" aka life being moved from inception towards death. SUR implies "beyond" aka being (life) at a distance (inception towards death). VIVE implies "to live".
Survival is based on living within everything...not outliving anything.
operator level
Operate implies "to be in effect"; level implies "balance"...a being cannot effect balance; each being represents the effect within balance aka choice.
networking
Arbeit macht frei (work will set you free)...a net confines those employed within.
putting off real life needs and wants
Putting off doesn't refer to NEED but to NOT WANT. Try putting off breathing to learn the difference.
God’s hands
God (motion) > auto (momentum) > manus (matter)...each being represents the hand (manus) of God, hence manually adapting to the auto-matic-process called God.
Furthermore...
a) God implies singularity; not plurality (hands).
b) God implies all...adding an (s) to God implies ones ignorance of all.
Correct
Doesn't holding onto correct over incorrect ignore apo (change) theos (god)?
Apotheosis
Trying to change (apo) God (theos) tempts one to ignore that God implies change.
around edge
Aka circle (around) + line (edge)...only within a line can a circle be shaped.
fresco
Holding onto fresco (fresh) makes it stale...
72
Look at the banner "E Pluribus Unum" (out of many; one)...while figuring out how to make 1 out of 72 ask yourself why the centerpiece is missing from the fresco?
Who is Gods centerpiece? What is the center of change?
The Name above all other names.
A name wasn't given by God but taken from one another, which keeps one below another.
Name isn't the moniker... its that spiritual reverence you feel when His Name is spoken
Speech implies the articulation of natural sound...sound doesn't have a name; it generates instruments, which wield the free will of choice to articulate speech.
The issue with any name...taking it into possession; holding it within possession; sharing it as possession, and permitting another to speak in the name of possession.
Name tempts possession of spiritual animation by sound...that's the origin of demonic possession.
God was, is and shall be
God was before anyone within shall be able to suggest to one another what God is. If God (theos) implies change (apo); then there's an ongoing change from was > be > is... notice that BE represents the center in-between WAS and IS.
- Marvel aka marv (to delay; demur) el (God)
God cannot be delayed, each one within God (perceivable) can delay self (perception) by consenting to one another (suggestion).
Consent (sending together) implies contract (drawing together) and togetherness implies adversary to one another aka satan.
Not easy to sue ai and it's wrong all the time.
It's because of its talmudic structure aka mishnah (precept) + gemara (ambiguity)...what gentiles view as right or wrong only represents ambiguity; not jewish precept.
AI cannot touch the precept...only distract users from it with ambiguity. Natural law cannot be touched by artificial rules.
Les_Horribles_Cernettes
- I gave you a golden ring to show you my love
- You went to stick it in a printed circuit
- To fix a voltage leak in your collector
- You plug my feelings into your detector
- You never spend your nights with me
- You don't go out with other girls either
- You only love your collider
- Your collider.
To collect implies ones consent to any suggestion of another; to detect implies each ones perception within all perceivable; to collide implies shaping a mental circuit (logic) into a physical ring (reason) by turning against one another over the suggested.
As for voltage aka electro (life) motive (inception towards death) force... fixing prevents one from disCERNing its fluidity.
Well, that's a reason to do anything
Breathing doesn't require reason.
Connection to the soul is what should always be, one.
- TO (towards) THE (theos; God) SOUL (sole; one and only)
- ALWAYS BE aka being (matter) within the way (momentum) of all (motion).
One does not connect to the soul...all implies soul/sole animating each one coming into being within by division/divination.
Being implies solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death)...it's the fluidity moving through each solidified being which represents the soul. Fluidity doesn't connect; it internally divides each solid from one another.
Male + female have to be divided from one another to be able to have intercourse with one another for further off-spring from one another.
To break the connection is what religion does
Nature gives each being a break from one another. Nature represents an analytical process separating essence (life) during transference (inception towards death).
Connection aka con (together) nect (to bind) ion (action) implies an artificial synthesis during natural analysis.
Religion aka re (to respond) ligo (to bind) implies ones consent to a suggested artificial synthesis.
Few are utilizing religion to tempt many into forming connection.
So religion adds a God between the one and only soul.
a) Only nature adds (inception) and subtracts (death) each divided being (life), while giving each the opportunity to multiply through one another.
b) God implies the one and only soul for each being (life) inBEtween origin (inception) and outcome (death).
Using non-religious descriptions...motion > momentum > matter aka cause > division > effect.
c) Religion implies ones response (re) to bondage (ligo) suggested by another aka ONES CHOICE selecting a CHOSEN ONE above self. Religion tempts one to choose an authority over ones free will of choice...not an addition; but a subtraction of self.
ethnology isn't a strong argument
Logy (logic) tricks ones mind to argue against another within conflicts of reason like strong vs weak. That's artificial. Nature uses implication (if/then) which aren't in a circular conflict against each another, but imply delineation aka opposites within the same line.
As for ethno (band of people living together)...that's an artificial synthesis tempting one to ignore the implied natural analysis of PER (by) SON (sound) aka sound > spectrum > instrument.
What does instrument imply? Each mind (ment) structured (stru) within (in) sound...it's banding minds together into a hive mind aka collective consciousness aka egregore aka groupthink aka gestalt intelligence aka mind coalescence etc. which establishes arguments aka distractions from a sound mind.
only referring to one language and two...
There can be only one aka one sound for each instrumental language/lingua (tongue) within.
Two implies suggested dualism established by ONEs consent to it. There are no two tongues in nature, but dualism tempts one to articulated words within natural sound, thereby splitting/forking ones tongue in two aka the snake mythology.
ignored context
Con (together) text/teks (to weave)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/context
Artificially weaving together (into a world wide web for example) tempts one to ignore what nature sets apart from one another. It's few who utilize suggestion to weave many together into a consensus which represents rule by context.
makes up its own logic
Logos (any word suggested in the name of God) > logic (circular thinking about the suggested word) > reason (turning against one another about the suggested word).
One cannot use logic without consenting to suggested logos aka giving self up to ownership of another aka one who speaks in the name of (e nomine) God.
God implies sound/sanus (entire; whole; all)...speech implies the articulation of natural sound aka the turning away from creator towards creation.
The word "all" doesn't mean ALL because one can add any other word to the word "all"...one (effect) cannot add anything to ALL (cause).
A being cannot add anything to nature...only shape everything nature offers or ignore nature for mental (ideals) and physical (idols) artifice shaped by one another.
How does one know the difference between natural and artificial? Nature moves and cannot be held onto, whatever one mentally or physically holds onto becomes artificial. For oneself...nature implies given; artifice implies taking.
It stretches reality to fit the origins of a word instead of handling the argument.
The origin of word implies sound. Sound stretches (inception towards death) instrument (life)...word compresses instrument into argument against one another.
Few suggest words to tempt many into argument, which makes it easier for few to handle many within sound, because sound sets each instrument free, while words keep many instruments in bondage.
you're not making point, you're changing the subject.
a) Change (inception towards death) objectifies (life)....ignoring change subjects an object to one another.
b) Inception implies the sentencing of life towards POINT of death. Few suggest dialectic to tempt many to share and hold onto "points" of view, which thereby distorts each ones sentence aka sentience.
Being implies the written sentence...focusing on any point permits another to write the end of ones sentence.
religions are established by shitheads
RE (to respond) LIGO (to bind) ION (action)...action implies nature; bondage implies artifice; response implies ones free will of choice in-between natural (perception) and artificial (suggestion).
The shithead shapes the word "religion" by synthesizing response; bondage, and action together...the bigger shithead consents to the synthesis without analyzing it.
The issue isn't few suggesting religions; but many consenting to join.
before us
More spell-craft shenanigans...BEFORE implies to forward (inception towards death) being (life) aka the status quo of coming into being. US aka "to unite states" implies suggested collectivism by few tempting many together.
religions are traps
Entrapment aka en (within) trap (contrivance for catching unawares) ment (mind) refers to suggestion as the contrivance to catch consent.
Religion; science; entertainment; politics; economics etc. represent different labels for the same process of farming consensus.
Why post it in a conspiracy discussion?
Because if "life is but a breath"; then con (together) spiracy (to breathe) turns life against one another.
connection to the soul
Soul/sole implies "one and only"...not connection with.
evoke the devine in these religions
Divine implies divided from one another; religion aka re (to respond) ligo (to bind) implies bound to one another...that's why ones free will of choice is required to join any religion.
Few ain't evoking the divine...few evoke the free will of choice of each to bind oneself to many, while ignoring the divine/divide of each from one another.
has all
All (cause) cannot be had by anyone (effect) within...it's few who distract many from that to affect the distribution of anything like oil or manufacturing within all.
Ottawa puts Canada in debt
Many consenting to suggested usury by few puts many into debt...no matter where.
spends the money
All (cause) cannot be spend by anyone (effect) within...few suggest currency to distract many from ongoing current by spending self on earning currency from another.
Those who suggest usury neither earn; not spend money...only those who consent have to.
immigrant
Being implies im (life) migration (inception towards death) hence being moved from beginning towards end of being.
Your reading skills are nog level.
A nog operates on "gibs me dats" aka wanting to take what's being given by another...level implies balance (give/take) for ones choice in-between.
value to conquer
Value (all perceivable) delineates evaluation (ones perception)...conquering aka con (together) quer (to seek) ignores value, while diminishing evaluation.
liberating Canada
How could the US ($39 trillion in debt) liberate Canada ($2.4 trillion in debt)?
our turn to do
Nature does a line aka inception > life > death, which allows each delineated one within to redo self or turn against one another. A circle can only be shaped within a line.
he asks them about the Talmud
Talmud instructs each jew who learns in-between THE (singularity) + THEM (plurality)...unlearned gentiles choose to ignore singularity for plurality.
THEM refers to gentiles as a collective...never to a chosen one aka each singular unit within THE (theos; god).
noticer...fck isrl
a) Notice/gno - "to know" implies ones perception within all perceivable...not what another suggests as writing in the talmud.
b) FCK ISRL not only censors self from saying "fuck israel", but represents a contradiction in terms aka Fuck/fuge - "masonic joint" implies holding together; israel/yisra'el - "he that strives with God" implies setting apart.
Both these shirts expose gentile ignorance which artificially conceals how each jew adapts to natural revelation.
Odysseus's descent into the underworld aka Hades; from hadein (invisible); from weid (to see)...what is it that makes all perceivable invisible to the sight of ones perception?
Ones willing consent to the suggestion of another; especially if directed by nolan/nolle (be unwilling) while being carried (pher) across (christo).
These represent space/spatior (to wander) making your mind wander/wonder about the suggestions of another, while on your space-travel odyssey (discernment) to hades (perception) as Christo (across) pher (to carry) Nolan (be unwilling)...an odyssey directed by ones free will of choice through Ulysses (discernment) and his best friend Nono (ignorance).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N50XnT9206w
How does one kill the giant cyclops (all seeing eye)? Why does Tele (over a distance) machus (battle; to fight) require rescue? What does traveling among unknown stars imply? Bodies as lifeless as stone (((stein)))? The way back to earth wiped from memory?