You're still making retarded shares, don't worry. There are no photographs of a flat earth that can withstand scrutiny. Just photos of the horizon from too low down to see a curve. There are plenty of photos of Sasquatch/Yeti that do withstand scrutiny. Real photos of real animals. There are also fakes, but they are revealed under scrutiny.
Why am I not surprised that a flat earther has zero understanding of how cameras work? Many old manual analog camera lens can be adjusted to focus on objects either nearer or farther away. It was a common problem, especially with cameras that had no view-finder (especially common on old cheap soviet cameras) that the lens would be focused incorrectly for the image they wish to capture, especially if the photo is taken quickly. No autofocus back then.
It's all about proportion:
if you still have that session open or saved, ask the AI if it made up this list. It's far too extensive and unlikely. ChapGPT just makes up stuff to fulfill requests. Even if you ask it not to, it will. It is not "intelligence". But if you ask it after the fact if the prior answer was generated or factually referenced from a source online, it will tell you if it was generated. I had similar results where it kept generating new items in a list, none of which actually existed when I tried to corroborate online.
I've used ChatGPT to try an find a list of articles by Lyndon LaRouche on the topic of Issac Newton, since he was a very prolific author writing in many different publications, I thought maybe the AI could relieve the burden of an extensive search.
It returned a seemingly comprehensive list of titles, publications and dates of publications. About 15-20 of them. However when I started looking for the articles, I could only find one of them. Long story short, all the other article titles were literally made up by chatgpt. They were not real articles.
Not to be trusted when pursuing factual informations is what I'm saying.
I do educate my self and I'm very careful. Flat earth is profoundly stupid and factually wrong. It is as much a cult belief system as climate change/global warming or the like.
what an angry comment. lol.
It's possible there are big voids within the earth.
It is not possible that the earth is a flat disc or whateverthefuck flatties think the shape is
I know you can download without an account. I wanted to upload a torrent but couldn't find a way to join.
This torrent is now available for download on Concen:
That is mentioned in the article, maybe you missed it or decided not to read it and just comment.
It is open to interpretation what was the intention of that warning, and how Mossad agents "came across" people "tied to Bin Laden" in Florida. You should read the article it's entirety. Can you come up with an israel-postive spin on all the points mentioned? It's pretty damning evidence of explicit prior knowledge of the exact time and target of the event.
No one. There are records of Bigfoot like animals going back centuries, on all the largest continents. Linneaus, who came up with the species classification system, originally had a separate branch for the Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti animals. I think it scares people that it's real, because it makes clear how little of the planet we are actually masters off, and how fragile we are as a species really.
If you really want to dig into how RFK may be controlled opposition, you could start better with the book 13 Bloodlines of the Illuminati, which says The Kennedys were one of the 13, alongside the Rothschilds and Astors and various other big names. Personally, I found the justification for including multiple of the cited family names under that banner, including Kennedy, to be unfounded, spurious and even arbitrary. You may find it more convincing though. I still consider it a worthwhile read even if I think the author didn't always have much justification for some of the names he selects (and some of the names he excludes).
This is all far less of a connection than, say; your daughter marrying Jared Kushner; studying the Kabballah with a private tutor; encoding Occult symbolism throughout the design of your sky-scraper in Jew York; your mentor being Roy Cohen; and being good friends with Jewish supremacists Jeffry Epstein and Ghislaine Maxell for a period of time in the 90's. Just saying.
So his wife had to suck up to Jews to make it as an actress. That's basically every well known actor's story.
Bobby Kennedy would be a fool to name the Jew in the current zeitgeist. He's probably well aware of the Israeli connection to his Father and Uncles killings though (and 9/11) but if he explicitly talked about it (beyond saying the CIA did it) without solid, concrete evidence (and even if he did have that) he would stand zero chance of being elected.
He stands close to zero chance any way, but I would prefer him over Trump in 2024, regardless of party affiliation. He could literally turn the Democratic party upside down if elected. And if the Obama/Biden regime can't take the guns away, RFK can't either. Plus I seriously doubt RFK would sign off on any mass shooting psyops to advance that agenda like they did.
In 2016 I would have chosen Trump over RFK, but it's not 2016, things have changed.
The greatest trick the Devil (Obama) ever played was declaring CO2 to be pollution.
Text of the post translated:
About ten years ago, when I worked in the Government, I sent an official request to Roscosmos to present to me the documentary evidence of the Americans on the moon available to this at that time as the federal agency. It really bothered me that the Soviet astronauts returning from multi-day expeditions barely kept their feet and underwent a long recovery after such flights, and the Americans crawled out of their lunar ships like cucumbers from the bed.
You know what I got in response?) The book "Concern by the astronauts of the Moon" with the comment of the cosmonaut Leonov that they really were there, because "they told him about it themselves."!
Having moved to work at the Roscosmos State Corporation in 2018, I continued to search for this evidence, but he didn’t find anything there either, except for the angry accusations of some of our lovers of going to America at the expense of academics, what am I, they say, undermine "sacred collaboration with NASA.", and also received one angry call from a high-ranking official with a charge, that I "exacerbate the international situation" with my doubts.
Yes, I did not undermine or aggravate anything, but only because of my nature I tried to get to the bottom of the details and establish, at least for myself, the true state of affairs in the matter of exploring the moon by our competitors. It was not clear to me how the United States at that level of technology development of the 60s of the last century did what they could not do now?
It never made any sense to me why anybody would say that
that's because it's a logical deduction based on evidence, an concept that's alien to flatties.
Feet / legs won't disappear. Try it. Basketball courts are flat.
"Linda Yaccarino, Chairman, Advertising and Partnerships, NBCUniversal, USA speaking in the Shaping the Future of Media, Entertainment and Culture at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2020 in Davos-Klosters, Switzerland, 21 January. Congress Centre - Salon."
A properly designed grass football field does not lie perfectly flat. The surface of the field often arcs a foot or more from the sidelines to the midfield to allow excess water to drain off. Without a crown, as the raised area is called, a grass football field can become a soupy, dangerous mess.
When everyone around you is a shill; you're the shill
Nice one, thanks for this. I've recently been scanning though some of what Lyndon LaRouche wrote about this Newton v Leibniz thing.
I had a filter entry for this domain but it clearly wasn't working. I entered the full url, https etc.
So now I'm trying just "wee.so". let's see if it works. There is no documentation for the community filter, just rumor passed around how it might work!
I am not convinced of this. The figure's proportions are too odd, thighs too stubby, arms too long, torso too large. There is no one else in the photo, so who's to say only one of the campers witnessed this animal and took the photo, but didn't mention it to the others for whatever reason. Hence there would be no mention of it in their diaries.
There is actually a satirical mention of Yeti (in general) in writing attributed to the campers, some kind of made up headline written down in jest. So maybe Yeti did come up in conversation, but not this explicit encounter, maybe brought up by the witness who did not want to explicitly say they saw one, and so talk of yeti's turned to humor.