0
PutinLovesCats 0 points ago +2 / -2

Well, if you listened to anything I said of the numerous convos we had, then you'd already know. Again, I'll refer you to the disclaimer:

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

The golden rule is a part of the ethos, and I've told you that. If it's reported, I'll give the user a warning or two. However, if it turns into trolling, stalking or abuse of other users here, then they will be temp banned.

You don't have to report everyone who called you a name, nor was that my intent. The goal is to prevent targeted harassment of users here and bad actors from shitting the place up.

2
PutinLovesCats 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't argue with retards.

Then why did you bother making a comment in the first place? You weren't arguing with anyone, you just straight up attacked OP.

3
PutinLovesCats [M] 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yes, the mod queue is quite filled, and we have been cleaning it up. See my other comment here to OP.

2
PutinLovesCats [M] 2 points ago +3 / -1

I've been cleaning up the mod queue myself (little by little each night), and it looks like Clem has started as well. Nothing nefarious. I've been ignoring 1+ year old comments that have been reported and removing some only if they are calls to violence. I can assure you, that short of calls to violence, no one will be retroactively banned. By me, at least.

Hope that clears things up.

1
PutinLovesCats 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why are you getting so defensive, dude? I just asked you a question. As for what that user is saying, I'm just hearing their side and having a convo. It's being taken with a grain of salt. However, what they said about you protecting/allowing Tallest (what the fuck ever) is true. You did, or at least turned a blind out (you admitted that). That is questionable, IMO, because they weren't just exercising free speech, they were actively and openly harassing other users here whilst constantly making calls to violence. That's fucked up.

You said it was cheeky "good fun/meme", but, like that user said, how many people left because that user? Why would you allow that? It's rhetorical, you already "told" me.

Anyways, this is transparency. Mods and users being able to talk freely amongst each other, as equals. So, chill the fuck out and stop being so defensive.

0
PutinLovesCats 0 points ago +1 / -1

Where do you think the UCC comes from

Not Common Law, it comes from the Law of the Sea/Commerce. Dating back to Rome.

It’s about public law vs private law.

No, it's about Commercial/Trade Law. This is what you're not overstanding. But, by all means... Continue on thinking the Courts Speak in Common Law.

1
PutinLovesCats 1 point ago +1 / -0

And this conversation is raising my eyebrow right now.

Why? You shouldn't be against transparency.

1
PutinLovesCats 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for giving the me history of how you did. I didn't mean anything by what I said, just had no idea how it happened. Axo never messaged me anything about it.

but obviously your memory is not good enough memory to remember over 1.5 million usernames

You were never considered a "regular" there when I was active or else I would know your username. I can list off a bunch of users that the community (myself included) considered regulars. Then again, I was banned and suspended so many times maybe your later posts fell through my cracks during them.

Anyways, like I said... Didn't mean anything by it, and I'm not accusing you of anything.

0
PutinLovesCats 0 points ago +1 / -1

We are talking about International Commercial Law and UCC (Uniform Commercial Code) here which Birth Certificates fall under. You're not speaking the same language/code that the Government actually uses. Black's Law is great for Common Law.

2
PutinLovesCats 2 points ago +3 / -1

Educating yourself is not pointless. However, trying to play the game within the game is pointless. As I said, the house always wins. That is how the game is set up. So, take the knowledge and use it to exorcise yourself from the game as much as humanly possible. However, as long you're a Citizen, then you're a Subject to a Sovereign, and can be Summoned (interesting word, how can living beings be "summoned" - another topic for another night ;) ) for damn near anything, You are a ward of the state.

If I was a rich man, I'd buy an island, denounce all Citizenship (become Stateless), and declare Sovereignty under International Law. I'd never be allowed privileges or entry into certain States, but, I'd truly be free.

Nothing in life is free though, and everything we've been taught is a lie.

11
PutinLovesCats 11 points ago +11 / -0

Just sit back, laugh, and watch them eat themselves alive.

1
PutinLovesCats 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh I agree about Amos as well. He still goes off the deep end just in comments alone with that account sometimes. Like almost zero restraint.

He knows he's protected. Ask him about Sheesie, lmfao it's his cryptonight. He is doing the same shit under the moniker of icky (and others). I've called that dude out so many times, it ain't even funny. Not sure if you were around during the game of trolls on Reddit, but, he came from that era,

I don't expect you to do anything, just making you aware.

Well, thanks for letting me know. I'll keep my eye out. I told Clems I wasn't happy with what I saw was going on when I came back. Still waiting to here back from axo about a few things.

As for the rest of what you said, yea... I don't know. I don't know how he became a mod here or why Axo made him one. He claims to be someone from /r/conspiracy but I don't ever remember that username, and I have a damn good memory. So, not sure how it all happened. I verified myself to Axo via Voat before it shut down, on accounts we both made back in the day.

Aren't we supposed that dude in the sidebar with the raised eyebrow? ;:-/

We are supposed to be, which is why I'm trying to turn the ship into the original direction (ie. Why I even approached Axo to help make this place into something after being burned by Reddit).

2
PutinLovesCats 2 points ago +3 / -1

Are you one of those sovereign citizens?

No, Sovereign Citizen is asinine and an oxymoron. A Citizen is a Subject of the Sovereign. You cannot be both. You are one or the other. For example, the Queen of England, and now the King of England, is the Sovereign. All those who claim Citizenship, are their Subjects. Subject and Citizen is interchangeable. If the King of England wanted to snipe a bunch of people from Big Ben, then he could. If anyone tried to stop him, then he could have them arrested. He is the Law, for the Law is Administered in His Name. The Sovereign.

3
PutinLovesCats 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you're a Citizen then no, you're fucked. There are legal theories (ie. see my comment to SumoSlammer) out there, but when you have a monopoly on force like the state does, then like a casino, the house (state) always wins.

4
PutinLovesCats 4 points ago +5 / -1

Eh, according to my research this isn't true at all. The birth certificate proves ownership/Jurisdiction and the SSN is for taxation. All incoming goods into a Country need a Certificate of Origin via a Manifest. This is what the Birth Certificate is. Once a vessel is birthed then the Country claims Jurisdiction. You, the parent register the child/good and get the Certificate of registry and the State owns the Title/Certificate of Origin. This is why CPS can take your child. No different than you owning the certificate of your car but it can be towed. You must own the original Titles/Certificates of Origin, which the state does.

There are legal theories on how one could obtain your true Certificate of Origin via various steps obtaining and notarizing documents. Start with Birth Certificate and make your way to Certificate of Live Birth -> up to the State Title -> up to the Federal Title. Some claim to have to done this but I have never actually seen proof. Granted, this was years ago when I was looking into the very topic.

Either way though, if you make the state mad regardless of how right you are, they will punish you. Don't expect LEO's or Judges to know anything about any of this or be honest enough to admit your right and have legal standing.

0
PutinLovesCats 0 points ago +1 / -1

Like I said, I don't know Clem and had been away for some time so not sure what they've been up to whilst I was gone. If what you're saying is true, then that is not good, I agree. However, that reminds me more of Amos not AATA on /r/conspiracy. I'm 98% sure that Amos is TMOR who created alts to attack and troll users into bans there. Ultimately, what would you like me to do? Axo is head mod here, not me.

6
PutinLovesCats 6 points ago +6 / -0

How corrupt is the United States?

Think of the most corrupt third world shit hole of a country you can. Now, times that by about 1000. That is how corrupt this Country actually is.

1
PutinLovesCats 1 point ago +1 / -0

What are you talking about "PI"?

Personally identifiable information.

So this guy was video editing, eh.

It appears so.

2
PutinLovesCats 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are quite some similarities between far right and far left ideologies.

Indeed.

Btw I hate commies.

Glad to hear, me too.

Anyways, good chat. Have a good one.

2
PutinLovesCats 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do I think that a website where the top posts regularly are openly antisemitic and racist is right wing? Where the founder uses racist and homophobic slurs?

Do you consider Communists Right Wing, because they too are pretty anti-Semitic and racist?

Why are you so upset about a man winning a Dutch women's pageant?

FTFY and I'm not mad, I think it's fuckin' hilarious.

1
PutinLovesCats 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not posting video which can possibly include PI. You can believe me or not. I have no reason to lie. lol, I literally spent 2 hours looking for and then charging one of my old phones from 2009 because I was buzzed.

3
PutinLovesCats 3 points ago +3 / -0

So a private company holds a pageant, decides to give the prize to a trans woman and somehow this is significant and it would not happen if womankind had "stuck up for themselves".

Yes, it wouldn't of happened if women protested and refused to participate when a mentally ill man was allowed to enter the contest for women.

Had you even heard of it before this started getting spammed on right wing websites?

Are you saying that this forum is a right wing website? Because that is how I learned of this.

1
PutinLovesCats 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cheers, and I do agree about Dero. I mined quite a bit when early on when it hardforked and got myself a nice bag of it. I too have high hopes for that project. Although, I'm a bit more skeptical about it than Monero.

I believe wholeheartedly in Monero. Dero, not so much, but hope it does great things. All I can say is, that they better not do something like Haven (XHV). I also believed in that project until the hack and they reversed the blockchain, therefore going against: "Code is law". Same shit Ethereum did thus creating Ethereum Classic.

view more: Next ›