a) Intel implies within (intel inside)...a frame implies outside.
b) What if inside (ones perception) within outside (all perceivable) can be tricked by the suggestions of another to cover self?
c) What if suggested information frames a picture painted by another within perceivable inspiration?
d) What if agent (inception towards death) generates regents (life)....while others suggest in the name of agency to distract ones regeneration?
skull and bones
Skull aka SK (one's self) CULL (separate from one another)...how?...by isolating ONE in-between BS suggested by another.
BS btw...not just bullshit, but also a bachelor's degree aka Baccalaureus Scientiae, and baccalarius (vassal farmer) of scientiae (scio; to know; to perceive) implies one who doesn't hold onto suggested scientism aka a serf/surf without a landholding.
Humpty Dumpty
a) Gotta put the pieces back together (e pluribus unum; out of many; one)...
b) The wall implies mass ignorance, build a few masons of free (will) with suggested information as bricks and ones consent as mortar.
c) Ignorance harms potential... https://www.chabad.org/holidays/passover/pesach_cdo/aid/667075/jewish/The-Egg-in-Exodus.htm
VAS'SAL, noun - "a feudatory; a tenant; one who holds land of a superior"
a) In reality...master (motion) generates dominance (momentum) for freemen (matter). Superiority (inception towards death) set inferiority (life) free to wield choice.
b) TEN'ANT, noun (Latin teneo; Gr. to strain, stretch, extend) implies life being stretched from inception towards death, which isn't a holding position, but the relief of solid within fluid.
c) Having sight implies one can SEE/SEA...others invert this by suggesting the "land of the free", and if one by free will of choice focuses ones sight by landing on the suggestion of another, then ones trust/thrust gets stranded on a bank of a shore.
In short...vessel (life) within sea (inception towards death) aka ones perception within all perceivable.
What's making people stupid?
a) Ones consent to another ones suggested information shapes a diminution or suspension of sensibility within oneself aka stupor/stupid.
b) Others suggest pluralism (people) to tempt each consenting; singular one (person) to ignore self discernment for concern about others.
c) "dis" implies separation of self; "con" implies unification with another. Showing concern about another distracts one from discerning self.
d) Person implies by sound (per sonos), hence separated through motion; while people implies "the vulgar; the mass of illiterate persons" aka consenting many unified under suggesting few.
e) Action generates reactions by internally setting itself apart aka making (inception towards death) remakes (life)...if one ignores what makes perceivable for the suggestions of another; then one permits another to remake.
Few remakes many by mixing singular together.
Sleight of hand:
- "There's not a problem that I can't fix; cause I can do it in the mix"
- "Cause away goes trouble (life) down the drain (inception towards death)"
https://genius.com/Indeep-last-night-a-dj-saved-my-life-lyrics
I know my name
a) One does not perceive (know) a noun (name)...one upholds a suggested noun upon perceivable. The name has to be given to something that existed beforehand without a name.
b) If a name is mine; then why are others required to give it to me? If others are not required to give me a name; then why would I require a name among others?
c) Can one claim self as "me; myself or I" without naming everyone else "you"?
d) Is there a difference between claiming for self and taking from another?
bob and proctor are two words
a) Hum, while saying "two" words...is it really two words or one sound?
b) Does two exist without one counting others? Where within nature can one perceive two?
c) Does all perceivable suggest each ones perception to count anything? How? How does nature shape a suggestion towards ones perception?
my parents give them to me
a) Where did my parents got the words to give from? How do I take a given word? Can one posses a word?
b) Explain the transaction of giving and taking among those within nature, and nature giving (inception) and taking (death) from each one (life) within...
that's an interesting question
Does being alive imply "within essence" (inter-esse) and is it a quest (question) towards an outcome or a struggle to sustain self within origin?
I believe if a person
If being implies by sound (per sonos); then is belief required for one to discern self?
look for the answer and you'll find it
a) What if an answer tempts one to wait for an outcome; while ignoring that ones origin implies solution (inception towards death) for ones problem (life)?
b) Why should life look forward, when it has sight (left/right; up/down; front/back) within origin?
simultaneously in three planes of understanding
a) What if there's only one plane (inception towards death) for each one within (life)?
b) What if similar (inception towards death) generates differences (life)?
c) What if ones understanding implies "standing-under" another ones suggestion by willing consent?
d) Where's the perceivable "three" without one choosing to count other ones as two, three...?
spiritual creatures
a) Spirit (Latin spiro, to breathe) implies partial (expression) adapting to whole (impression)...whole had to exist before partial came to be.
b) Suggested creationism implies "out of nothing", while being partial within whole implies "within everything".
c) How could ones perception perceive any creation, when all perceivable had to exist before ones perception came to be? One cannot have awareness of surrounding without surrounding generating ones awareness at center.
we have an intellect
Intellect (Latin intelligo; to understand) implies standing-under what another suggests. How could one have what another suggests one to submit to? That's like kissing the pimp hand while pretending to own it...aka a bitch on stockholm syndrome.
we live in physical...
Matter (life) can only live within momentum (inception towards death) of motion aka physical (matter) within mental (momentum) of spiritual (motion). Motion forces one to breathe; while momentum implies the perceivable moment one has to react by free will of choice to sustain matter...or ignore it.
because we lack awareness
Self discernment implies "being within cause", hence not lacking anything, but given access to everything. Ignorance/denial thereof can be discerned right back to ones free will of choice given by the internal balance (momentum) of everything (motion) given to each one (matter) within...unless further ignored/denied by each ones free will of choice.
Others tempt one to ignore/denial self discernment with suggested rhetoric like "because"...which inverts "cause towards being"...yet only ones consent by free will of choice to the suggested rhetoric by another establishes ignorance/denial.
we're totally locked
Total (perceivable) sets partial (perception) free (will of choice)...choosing to consent to the suggestions by another locks one within ones mind/memory, where one remembers and contemplates suggested information; while ignoring/denying perceivable inspiration.
we let things outside of us control us
Ones consent to the suggestion by another permits another to control from outside, what one puts inside self.
Perceivable inspiration goes through one and cannot be held onto; while suggested information tempts one to hold onto it within ones mind/memory; where it becomes simultaneously ones burden upon self and ones debt to another.
reacting to life
Process of dying acts; living reacts...reaction can be tricked to ignore action, for the reactions of one another.
Few suggest actors under directors to distract many from discerning self as reactors (life) within direction (inception towards death).
how to boil pasta
By utilizing natural physical process (chemistry) of all (al) aka alchemy...instead of using ALT+F for some stale pasta.
a) Only balance makes choices...ones choice either adapts to balance (need/want) or ignores it for imbalance (want vs not want), hence wielding free will of choice withing dominance of balance aka free-dom.
b) Betting implies gambling ones choice away by selecting a chosen ones suggestion.
c) Inception towards death "makes"; life "re-makes"...life can only respond to being made by.
Not everything is a global mass sacrifice ritualistic spell.
a) Everything implies a sacrificial (life) rite (inception towards death) of passage for each one within.
b) All (perceivable) reveals each one (perception)...others suggest spelling to spell-bind revelation, and ones consent to it, conceals self.
c) Globe aka being (be) clod (Latin gleba)...CLOD, verb - "to collect into concretions, or a thick mass; to coagulate" aka inversion of being set apart from ONE another.
nothing happened
a) Nothing implies ones denial of everything perceivable for suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing).
b) Happen (come by chance) inverts being...coming to be choice.
cycle
a) What if it isn't a cycle (perpetual circle; proceeding from first to last?)
b) What if only temporal (life) within perpetual (inception towards death) are being processed from first (inception) to last (death)?
c) What if motion (direct flow) generates matter (wave form) internally/inherently?
d) What if sight (left/right + up/down + front/back) of wave (life) within direction (inception towards death) implies "cubic"?
e) Consider the following line:
"Wir quadrieren den Kreis gegen alle Konvention'...Und geiseln den Geist der Konterrevolution" (we square the circle against all convention...and take hostage the ghost of counterrevolution)
Here's the whole album: "Quadratur des Kreises" by Freundeskreis... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_nwwRnsN3Q
of course
Aka proceeding from (life) motion forward (inception towards death)...
- https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/of
- https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/course
claim
What does seeking to obtain within a moving system imply? Can matter claim motion without other matter becoming a burden of debt?
We can’t explore our
Suggested pluralism (we/our) and denialism (can't) contradicts ex ploro (to cry out). Consenting to a suggestion tempts one to keep the suggested within self instead of letting it out.
we know
Knowledge (all perceivable) reveals itself only to singular (ones perception)...suggested knowledge in the name of others (we) conceals ones perception if consented to.
massive object
Few suggest progressivism aka that to which the mind is directed for accomplishment or attainment; end; ultimate purpose (object) to tempt each ones consent to be aMASSed under few.
As in...order followers implies massive (followers) object (order) and it's a few suggesting those orders.
...is real
Reality WAS perceivable before anyone within can suggest what it IS. Resist what others suggest is real/rael...
species, had been genetically altered
Generation (inception towards death) of particulars (life) through alternation from one another aka internal differentiation...that's what "genetically altered species" implies.
humans as containers
a) Contain implies holding together; being implies set apart from one another.
b) Hue (color) of man implies a spectrum aka specification aka particulars within whole differentiated from one another.
c) Life; while being moved from inception towards death "wants" to hold onto, yet "needs" to let go of.
In short: living implies a revelation...not a containment.
origin of humanity
a) Origin of HUE (color) implies light.
b) Origin of MANual (life) implies auto (inception towards death).
significant mystery
Mystery implies "to conceal"; signal implies "a notice given aka to reveal"...
Perceivable reveals perception; suggested tempts perception to conceal itself by ignorance/denial from perceivable.
container of soul
If SOUL/SOLE; than WHOLE for each partial within...suggested "container of soul/sole/whole" contradicts itself, while tempting one to ignore self discernment.
Soul (energy) cannot be contained...all power can only exist within energy, which isn't a container, but a revelation of method (inception towards death) for each being (life) within.
knew there was going to be...in advance
Being implies within advance (perception) of knowledge (perceivable)...hence advance (to bring forward) ment (mind/memory).
pandemic
Suggested pan (all) demic (people) tempts each consenting person to ignore former (all perceivable) for latter (suggested people).
All sets itself apart into each one within, while people implies an aggregation of each person within coming together. Hence...PEOPLE, noun (Latin populus) - "the vulgar; the mass of illiterate persons; the commonalty; a collection or community of animals".
a) All suggested information implies "manufactured theatre" aka manually shaped and shown to another...as oppose to perceivable inspiration; which operates auto (inception towards death) matic (life).
b) ONEs consent to another ONEs suggestion implies dualism aka one holding onto another one establishing a bond of two.
c) Ones choice selects chosen ones suggestion, while binding self into a dualism called "reason" aka one side vs another, as in...want vs not want; true vs false; yes vs no; belief vs disbelief; us vs them; good vs evil; rich vs poor; left vs right; enlightened vs profane; football vs soccer; on vs off; big mac vs whopper; uptown vs downtown; 1st world vs 3rd world; black vs white; nintendo vs sega; bmw vs mercedes benz; feminism vs patriarchy; vaxxed vs unvaxxed; trump vs biden; israel vs hamas; jews vs gentiles; russia vs ukraine; straight vs queer; vanilla vs chocolate; islam vs christianity; communism vs capitalism etc.
The sides don't matter...only ones choice being tempted off-center towards suggested sides matters for chosen ones.
people can't seem to take themselves out of
a) Suggested pluralism (people; them) tempts perceivable singular (person; one) to ignore self for others.
b) Being implies within...others suggest progressivism to tempt one out of/away from.
c) Consenting to suggested information implies TAKING it into possession, hence burdening self with a debt to another. Perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto, it needs to be let go off.
Reason operates like a chinese finger trap...holding onto any side keeps one within conflict. Only center offers release. Being implies choice (life) within balance (inception/death)...either side imbalances choice.
facial recognition
Who nose...
a) Dying (motion) was before living (matter) comes to be....others suggest what "is" to distract from that.
b) Self implies perpetuation of ones life through another one. Only living can self perpetuate...not the process of dying.
c) Suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (being within everything)....consenting to suggested contradicts self discernment within perceivable.
d) GI'ANT, noun (Latin gigas) - "earth-born" aka terrigena aka generated (inception towards death) earth (life) aka motion generating matter internally/inherently.
e) Earth/heart implies pulsation within motion aka center of surrounding aka core/cordis. It also implies hearth (burning place; fire place) from ker (heat; fire).
Cold (inception towards death) generates heat (life)...a burned offering; a sacrificial furnace.
f) Motion generates matter (living) within momentum (dying)...only matter can experience momentum.
transhumanist agenda
a) -ist (transhumanist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (transhumanism). Consenting to another ignores/denies self.
b) Few suggest agenda (action) to tempt many to consent (react), while ignoring to be reaction (perception) within action (perceivable). One cannot react to each others suggestions without ignoring perceivable origin acting upon self.
For example...consenting to a suggested "PC aka personal computer" tempts one to ignore being by (per) sound (sonos), hence not thrown together (compute) but set apart (separate).
Ones consent permits another to craft spells like putting reality (per sonos) and fiction (compute) together within the same word (PC).
extermination
A spell once again...being implies EXpressed reaction (life) withIN impressing AcTION (inception towards death)...ones consent to a suggested TERM (Latin terminus, a limit or boundary); hidden in plain sight at the center of exTERMination, binds one to suggested fiction; while ignoring perceivable reality.
In reality...each one implies center (free will of choice) within boundary (dominance of balance) aka free-dom; yet one can only discern this as oneself, not by suggestions from others.
human
Animal generates human aka animation generating hue (color) of man aka motion (male) to momentum (fe-male) to matter (trans-formed-off-spring).
Color implies visible spectrum of light for each ray/race/raddix/radius within...others suggest mixing pure light (white) and absence of light (black) together to obfuscate the visible spectrum in-between. This implies both the masonic checkerboard and the equality (same) through diversity (difference) agenda utilizing the rainbow as the representation of the visible spectrum of light.
happening now
a) Suggested HAP'PEN (to come by chance) tempts one to ignore perceivable...choice coming to be within balance.
b) Happenstance implies standing of a gambler betting self on chance...a loosing stance.
Sleight of hand:
- You're playing so cool...obeying every rule
- Deep way down in your heart...you're burning, yearning for some
- Somebody to tell you...that life ain't passing you by
- I'm trying to tell you...it will if you don't even try
- You'll get by if you'd only...cut loose; footloose; kick off the Sunday shoes
https://www.lyrics.com/lyric/3213935/Kenny%20Loggins/Footloose
as if no one has freewill except the jew
a) Ones choice selects chosen ones suggestion. For example "no"...which implies suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) and ones consent to de-nial perceivable for suggested.
b) Except aka ex capio (taking out) implies ones choice to take something suggested out of another, while ignoring to be within perceivable.
Perceivable (inspiration) cannot be taken/possessed/held onto...suggested (information) can be held mentally if one chooses to hold onto it aka taking possession of it, while becoming possessed by it.
it sounds like...became
Became is a suggested word inverting perceivable sound...within one "came to be" different from one another...not alike.
Did the...British...bear no responsibility?
Ones response-ability (free will of choice) is shirked onto another when consenting to suggested pluralism (the British).
And are we really to believe Russians were incapable of creating/drinking alcohol without the help of jews?
a) Creationism (creating) and nationalism (russians) are suggested by few to tempt many to consent/accredit/believe it.
b) One does not need to drink alcohol...one needs perceivable thirst; while others suggest alcohol to tempt ones appetite into conflicts of reason like vodka vs ouzo; beer vs wine; soft liquor vs hard liquor; high percentage vs low percentage; alcoholic vs non-alcoholic; drunk vs sober; indulging vs abstaining; expensive vs cheap; fruity vs earthy; red vs white; martini vs margarita; bloody mary vs cosmopolitan etc.
c) It's the industrialization of temptation by few for many, which "willingly" exterminates many in favor of few.
d) If consent meets suggestion; then it shapes suicide (buying into) meeting genocide (selling out). FREE will of choice cannot be bought or sold without ones free will of choice to ignore/deny self...a jew chooses to be the merchant for that deal with gentile self denial.
would they just drink less if jews weren't involved in alcohol production?
Consider "don't get high on your own supply"...if one produces and consumes alcohol, then ones production and consumption will suffer shortly after. Entrance the happy merchant of temptation supplying production towards consumption for a price. This way...the production exponentially increases, while each consumer exponentially drowns in loss, while paying not just for the product, but with his life (and the life of others) for the consumption.
Underneath all of that operates need (thirst) and want (appetite)...which can be tempted into a conflict of reason (want vs not want). A jew sells both sides within every conflict of reason to each consenting gentile; who willingly ignores perceivable need.
I have no reason to believe...
Belief (consent to suggested) generates reason (conflict over suggested)....like for example believing "no" generating "yes vs no" reasoning.
Consider making a statement about self (i have no) build upon a conflict with others (yes vs no reasoning). Guess who makes bank by selling you "nothing"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
being rich is a measure
Who measures/evaluates the suggested values by few? It's the free will of choice by many, which in return makes few rich and many poor.
Meanwhile...being implies evaluation (perception) within value (perceivable). Consenting (to buy) to suggested (to sell) devalues being, which permitting a merchant to set the prices.
to take advantage of
Aka suggesting others to consent.
advantage
Aka being (life) advanced (inception towards death) which implies one needing to resist wanted temptations by others.
Notice now that ones suggestion tempts others to "take", which then advances them towards death.
workforce
EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power"...force within work implies action (inception towards death) and reaction (life) aka loss and growth; flow and form; velocity and resistance; motion and matter; balance and choice; need and want etc.
Joining a suggested "workforce" tempts one to ignore being set apart within whole force of work.
Not holding my breath on that.... used to believe in...
Can one hold breath without needing to let go? Why would holding onto beliefs be different? What forces one to breathe, and what forces one to let go of any and all beliefs? Could it be the same force (inception towards death) differentiating (life)...
to believe in the power of awareness and knowledge
Do awareness (perception) and knowledge (perceivable) need ones belief in suggested?
Noticed.