How can we take...
Letting go of pluralism (we) allows one to adapt to all singularity gives. The issue with forbidden knowledge was about "taking" it...
demands acceptance
A demand implies a suggestion; acceptance implies by ones free will of choice...to accept any demand binds ones free will of choice to a chosen one.
The mandate of heaven implies each beings rise (to heave) within the natural order (mandare) by free will of choice.
Wir wollen das Schöne mit vollen Zügen geniessen, uns daran klammern und alles vermeiden, was nach menschlichem Ermessen unseren Mitmenschen schadet.
It's holding onto which prevents one from avoiding the conflict against ones fellow human beings. The beautiful moves...holding onto the measurement thereof mentally (ideal) and physically (idol) shapes ugliness.
Wenn ich den Russen jetzt schade, dann deshalb, weil sie sonst mir schaden würden.
That implies ones choice to ignore natural origin for artificial outcome...a fear based perspective fueling and justifying the conflict one tries to avoid.
wie der liebe Gott...er schmeisst plötzlich die Menschenmass auf die Erde
Liebe implies Hass aka a division, hence not an amassing together, but a division apart from one another.
sich selber darum kümmern wie man durchkommt
Each different being (life) comes through the same way (inception towards death)...life isn't about taking care about how to get through dying, but the opportunity to grow during loss.
der stärkere siegt...später fressen Insekten die wilden Tiere, und es blieben endlich nur die Mikroben.
So the smallest represents the strongest, yet humanity continues to seek power by amassing one another. Furthermore...using winning vs losing as the base for strength implies gambling aka ones addiction to losing strength.
Natur- und Lebensgesetze
There can be only one aka one nature for each being within. Natural law implies reality; the laws of being represent fiction.
mit der Zeit in Einklang zu bringen
Time implies a measurement taken, which tempts one to ignore given Einklang aka all sound for each one within. Einklang isn't something one brings forward; but all bringing each one forward.
sat down
Can't be free while confining self to a chair so it's more of a stand up kinda situation.
wrote this
Always on the fly while drawing from inspiration (besides the copied links)...
geometric shapes
Motion delineates (inception towards death); which permits matter (life) to shape...few suggest geometry aka geomancy to tempt many to hold onto shapes instead of shaping.
something
Nature departs each thing from one another...few sum many things together. There's no sum of thing (something) within nature unless one thing takes a geo-metric measurement of other things.
signs and symbols rule the world
Rule/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rule Straight delineation (inception towards death) generates each diverse shape (life). Few cast (bol) together (sym) identifying marks; tokens; omens (signs) to distract many from delineation.
The G in the Freemason logo means
a) G implies generation aka each matter generated within all motion...meaning implies a measurement taken by matter, while ignoring motion.
b) Free implies ones "free" will of choice; mason implies "to knead; fashion; fit", and logo implies "logic"...few tempt many to misuse free will of choice to knead; fashion; fit logic (circular thinking) while ignoring delineation.
the circle with the star sign extracts energy from people
Energy delineates internal power aka from action into reaction aka cause to effect aka motion to matter aka loss to growth aka all to one...a circle is shaped by putting the beginning and end of a line together, thereby short-cutting delineation.
People implies a summation of each departed person...joining a summation (consenting to a suggestion) permits few to extract wasted energy from many.
As for the star-shape: "people they come together; people they fall apart; no one can stop us now; cause we're all made of stars"... https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/moby/weareallmadeofstars.html
accidentally revealed
Accident implies "coming by chance"...being implies "coming into choice" which is how nature reveals being. Few tempt many to ignore given choice by taking chances, which is called "gambling" and inverts intention into accident.
seen by all when they drive
All drives (inception towards death) each steering vehicle (life)...few suggest car/chariot aka charon, the ferryman who takes us to the realm of the dead to automate the mobility of many. In simple...suggested progressivism tempts life to drive towards death instead of resisting the push/pull of delineation.
nature doesn’t have straight lines but shapes do
Nature implies the one and only straight line (inception towards death) for each shaped form (life) within, and since being implies in-between entrance and exit...one cannot perceive the line; only derive discernment from being within delineation.
Few tempt many to "toe the line" by suggesting consensus to conformity; rules and standards aka by following orders. If one follow the natural order; then one shortens ones life-line aka reducing ones growth into a flat-line.
Shapes cannot do...only line does; which allows form to re-do shapes aka shaping/forming aka transformation aka transfer of form within motion.
Words act
Sound acts; instrument re-acts...words tempt instrument to ignore sound for words shaped by another instrument.
Instrument implies mind structured within sound...words tempt ones mind to be conducted by another, while ignoring that sound offers instruments the free will of choice to shape freely.
what we speak we usually believe
To believe implies ones consent to the suggestion of another aka a contract binding ones free will of choice. Speech implies the articulation of natural sound...only nature allows being to freely shape; while artifice confines ones choice to a chosen one.
Gentiles think in words a jew shaped within sound to confine thought to programmable languages. Only within sound can one think straight (across), while words confine thought to an inward (logic) and outward (reason) circle/kikel/kike...
law of faith
Faith tempts one to hold onto, while ignoring that natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies a separation from one another.
Do shapes have a similar effect?
Only within same cause can there be each diverse effect...affection to one another shapes similarity among effects.
appears as a cube
Appearance implies "to come into view"...ones view implies left/right + up/down + front/back aka from within a cube (kabah) of all (allah). Few tempt many to draw a circle around the cube as to confine linear perception to circular suggestion.
shape is used to hex
Hex implies six (seco; to divide) + hexe (witch; which) + hexte (devil; to throw apart)...nature divides by throwing apart (inception towards death) being (life).
So which/witch one does one choose...natural perception or artificial suggestion? Holding onto the shape of the latter puts a hex on one.
the pattern of the soul
Soul/sole - "one and only", hence pattern/patron/patri - "father"...it's claiming soul for self or buying and selling to another, which tempts one to ignore that.
the cube represent a prison
Not prison (confinement), but prism which refracts light and spreads it within a spectrum.
Motion (light) > momentum (spectrum) > matter (refraction)...
a square with a circle inside
Logic represents the inside circle; reason the outside circle. Square implies one side of a cube (left+right; up/down; front/back).
Logic tempts mind to choose a side over the other, while reason turns both sides against one another (left vs right; up vs down; front vs back)...if one chooses one side, then one ignores being within the whole (allah) cube (kabah).
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Huey-lewis-and-the-news-hip-to-be-square-lyrics
- I used to fool around...now I'm playin' it real straight
- It's hip to be square
Bonus: hip/hep - "cry to instigate attacks on jews in Europe, 1819 in reference to jewish expulsions by mobs in various German cities in that year (later called the hep-hep riots)"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/hep#etymonline_v_9165
triangle
Putting together upward triangle (3) and downward triangle (3) aka 33 establishes the six-pointed star aka 666...
points represents energy
Point implies "end of sentence"...coming into being implies living sentience sentenced from inception towards point of death. A point tempts one to ignore being within a linear procession, which is how energy internally divides power.
Cathedral
Aka cathode aka kata (down) hodos (way)...as opposed to anode aka ana (up) hodos (way).
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies anode (growth) within cathode (loss)...few suggest cathode to tempt anode to annul itself by joining together manifold.
First article: "Remembering the Horrors of the Holocaust "... https://answersingenesis.org/sanctity-of-life/remembering-horrors-holocaust/
"Holocaust Remembrance Day is observed each year on January 27, calling the world to remember the six million jews and millions of others murdered under Nazi persecution. For Christians—especially those committed to a biblical creationist worldview—this day carries a sobering relevance"
- Cor/com (together) rect/reg (to move in a straight line)... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=correct
a) Putting cor + rect together represents a contradiction in terms since a line (inception towards death) moves apart (life) anything within it.
b) -isms (consensus) can only be shaped within a line by an -ist (consent)
c) Big Bang implies a measurement taken in-between big and small, as well as confrontation of one against the other (big vs small)...that's the origin of a big bang.
Within "big" nature there can be only each "small" bang aka the intercourse among being.
d) Now isn't the end of the line, but each beings perception from within the line. Within all perceivable each ones perception can only perceive "now"...not before or after.
e) God isn't detached from the line, but represents the singularity of the whole line for each anointed one (christ) coming into being within. It's the label "god"; attached within a being for the line, which inverts detach-ment (analysis) with attach-ment (synthesis).
Letting go of suggested "god" allows one's sight to perceive how all perceivable works.
f) Suggested creationism aka creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing) tempts one to deny (nihilo; nothing) the line, while being (life) moved (inception towards death) within it.
g) Various/variare - "to change" implies motion...only within change can diverse come into being.
A grow Upward within a way Forward equals two ways.
Growing upward (life) while moving forward (inception towards death) implies a singular process for each single potential within. It's taking a measurement which tempts one to view growth within loss as two or more.
Example: to view inhaling and exhaling as two tempts one to ignore a single spirit moving through. What about eating and drinking? What one puts in moves through and out...as hunger and thirst move forward one grows upward.
Any way is singular
a) Only within a singular way can there be a sense of direction any which way.
b) Suggesting what a way IS tempts one another to ignore that the way WAS moving before one came into being. Defining motion contradicts its nature...yet only artificially within ones mind.
Any two-way dual is within a new one-way singular.
Any implies within all aka the internal division of all (perceivable) into each one (perception) and anyone else (suggestion) which implies a singular process.
Others suggest old (before) and new (after) to distract one from now (in-between). Why? To invert internal division by external unification (old vs new).
Every way is Towards
Every can be viewed by each as ALL or a SUM of each...the latter tempts one to ignore the former. The one and only way (inception towards death) implies ALL, while each one within (life) can be measured by mind into a SUM.
Example...only within one way can there be each cat and dog. Others can suggest CATDOG to trick ones mind into thinking in different ways. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CatDog (notice the singular sign shows both directions).
Life towards Death can be endless
a) Inception towards death implies endless aka "ending loss" for each living growth within. Only within ending loss can a being grow.
b) Notice that "life towards death" ignores origin of life aka "inception". It's progressivism which tempts one to ignore origin (perception) for outcome (suggestion).
Inception and Death are singularity points
a) Point implies "end of sentence"...inception implies "beginning of sentience". Measuring sentences tricks sentience to ignore itself, hence lack of self discernment.
b) Singularity implies a line within which shapes are moved towards a point. Pointing towards implies as particular within whole.
the way to a singularity
Way implies singularity...each wanderer (life) implies from (inception) to (death) while within singularity.
From the Christian perspective...Christ isn't on his way to God, but being temporarily christened within the ongoing animation of God.
It's ones mind which can be tricked to view the differentiation of singularity (analysis) as multiple different ways to reach singularity (synthesis).
Be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the Spirit
To invert that...drinks are advertised as liquors (motion) and spirits (momentum) towards being (matter).
refers solely to coexisting
How could sole coexist? With what could sole coexist?
other use of "dimension"
Aka division (di) of mind (mens) within action (ion)...solely a singular process.
coexisting mensurable spectra
Doesn't coexistence with another makes special spectra common?
period
Why the use of peri (around) to distract from per (forward)? https://www.etymonline.com/word/peri-
Forwards (per) implies linear progression; around (peri) implies a circle...why does period contain a contradiction in terms?
element
Aka the inversion of mind (ment) within (e) God (el). Where else could a mind come into being?
solely measurable
If it's solely (one and only); then what else is GIVEN to TAKE measures into mind?
change causes all
All implies cause for each one within change. Change + Cause + All imply the same origin for anything else.
Digamma
Gamma/gimel - "camel"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/gamma aka beast of a burden from jamala - "to bear"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/camel
Di-gamma implies "to bear division" aka to carry (inception towards death) division (life).
the way you...
Aka the way (inception towards death) you (life)...that's 1-10. 11 ignores that strength implies ones growth within the way...not an addition to the way. 12 inverts reality (singularity) with fiction (dualism) and 13-27 operate within the established fiction.
What is Israel?
Israel/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" aka the struggle of each Christ (life) within all of God (inception towards death).
Is it a state in the Middle East?
A state (life) in the middle (inception towards death) with the free will of choice to incline north; east; west; south. To tempt choice off-center others suggest NEWS to draw ones inclination into circumference.
The people of the Old Testament?
a) God implies singularity...hence each being within implying person aka per (by) son/sonos (sound). Others suggest plurality (people) to tempt ones choice into bondage to a chosen one.
b) New and old imply the test of mind (testament) to ignore the middle aka NOW...ones perception within all perceivable can only work NOW...not before or after.
The kingdom of the Israelites?
There cannot be a plural (isrealite) within the dominating king (singularity)...only each ones FREE will of choice within DOM-inance.
The perpetuation of oneself through another by inter-course for off-spring implies KIN(g) aka the throne aka the SEAT/SEED of God.
Modern jews?
No modern vs future...only presence. No jews (plural)...only jew/you (singular).
Kagan
Aka Khagan/khan (king)...also found with the bolshevik Kaganovitch brothers (lazar + mikhail), the Khazars, and of course Kohen/cohen (priest).
reading without consent
The writing (mentally and physically) is based on ones consent to suggested letters of a language arranged in customary order, like for example abc/abece/abecedary - "abracadabra".
Within nature...writing implies to draw (inception towards death) a figure (life), which read/re - "reason; to count" contradicts.
Alien as is unknowable
a) Knowledge implies each ones perception...alien implies another ones suggestion.
b) Alien represents a suggested brand for something "unknowable", but it's ones consent to the suggested brand which confines ones perception from perceivable knowledge.
c) The artificial brand "alien" is being held up within ones mind, while tempting one to ignore that nature doesn't brand/label/name. Accepting a label such as "alien" by "another" implies a mark of a trade (trademark), which forms an establishment (established within mind).
If one allows another to establish marks within ones mind, then more and more becomes unknowable to ones perception.
natural understanding
Knowledge implies natural; understanding implies artificial...all knowledge moves through each one, while understanding implies standing under another, while holding up suggested information within ones mind.
the natural way a human brain works
Nature implies the working way...a human brain implies employ-ment within natures working way. It's another who suggests one that things don't work as to tempt one to work for others.
I see nature as combining...
Nature (all perceivable) and your sight (ones perception) are divided from one another so that one can see all has to offer. It's the suggestions by another which tempts ones consent into a combination aka an artificial synthesis aka collective consciousness aka gestalt intelligence aka hive mind etc.
combining each
Before each (singular) can be combined (plural) with one another...nature divided all (singularity) into each one (singular unit).
every other being comes into effect and can be affected.
The coming into being implies the cause (perceivable); each being implies effect (perception) and affection (suggestion) to one another.
Affection (want) turns effect (choice) from cause (need).
Death is but a wave to ride
Death implies the end of a line starting at inception...it's each life within which represents a wave-form balancing within linear procession. The height of each wave is shaped by ones free will of choice or cut short by the choices of one another affecting one.
to ride into another state...
...implies inter-course for off-spring hence perpetuation of oneself through one another. The ride implies flow-state; each rider within implies formed state.
beaten death
To beat implies "towards being at", hence living within the process of dying. From the moment of inception until the point of death...each living being beats death hence the struggle for self sustenance.
prophesy towards
Sound towards in-stru-ment...pro (forward) phanai/bha (to speak) tempts one another to ignore that.
everlasting life
Last implies "loss", hence everloss (inception towards death) for each temporal growth (life)...that's what everlasting life implies, and it's ones perception which gets distorted by the use of words to describe that.
to trap
To implies "towards"...it's ignoring that which traps ones mind aka self confinement. Nature moves being towards...artifice traps a being within its own mind.
Sound moves towards instru-ment; words trick into entrap-ment.
Trapping words within mind implies a combination of ones consent and another (alien) ones suggestion.
AI is 'alien' technology
Alien/alius - "another"...artificial implies ones ignorance of all natural (perception) for one another (suggestion). That's why anything artificial implies alien.
If anyone builds it, everyone dies
a) Nature divides each being from one another, so if anyone builds artifice with one another, then every other living being is affected.
b) Only within the process of dying (inception towards death momentum) can living matter come into being...so "everyone dies" implies the status quo of being alive. It's using death to sell fear why "everyone dies" sounds like an ominous doomsday prophecy.
will find only...in what you are reading
It's ones free will of choice to find not only what others write for reading, but the natural foundation within which artificial writings are being shaped.
Only within a line of progression (inception towards death) does one have the potential (life) to write anything to one another. It's that line of thinking only ones free will of choice can find.
A jewish civil rights organization (NRA) vs an assistant attorney within the jew-dicary about who's responsible for a jewish revolutionary catching a bullet...from ZOG.
Your reaction to "goyim" implies a trigger, just like you use "nazi" to trigger others...free-will-of-choice traces words through etymology to their origin within sound...nazi/nati - "native" + goyim/goylem - "golem".
It's even on the wiki page: "Golem passed into Yiddish as goylem"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem
Drawing inspiration from how a shapeless mass (golem) was shaped into trigger (goyim)...that's what sustains free will of choice, while being positioned forwards (pur-pose) within the entirety of nature.
nonsensical
Within all (al) one cannot sense (sensi) nothing (non)...few suggest the word "nonsensical" to gain remote control over the minds of many. Did I mention the Hebrew origin of nonsense...shtuyyot?
subhuman
Hu aka hue implies "color"...being within the visible spectrum of light implies in-between aka above/below. In other words...being able to differentiate between light and dark implies ones sub-hue-man position.
As for the jewish origin of subhuman (later dubbed Untermensch)...if few are chosen ones, then many are subhuman to the chosen ones. Also...let's not forget that before the Untermensch rebrand there was Nietzsche's Übermensch setting up the conflict, which a jew later rebranded into Superman aka the man of steel (stalin).
a) Taking contradicts being given free (will of choice).
b) Both coherence vs incoherence and attack vs defend represent additions by you to confine others in conflict...free-will-of-choice didn't take any sides.
c) What if it's the goyim/gollum/golem which are remotely controlled like an automaton devised by a sorcerer... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem
Let's add some context to revisionism...1933 (judea declares war against Germany) + 1945 (allies win world war II).
Is your statement right or wrong?
Ones state of mind implies linear progression...not circular (right vs wrong) conflict.
You want me to believe the picture represents blah blah blah
a) Represent aka "to respond to presented" implies adaptation...believing turns against adaptation by taking something into possession.
b) A picture implies a "capture moment" aka matter artificially holding onto natural momentum of motion. Others then move pictures (movies) to mimic motion, while matter continues to ignore adaptation to momentum, when watching a movie.
You're either...or...
Being implies one (partial) within all (whole)...circular conflict (either vs or ) tempts one to ignore the delineation of singularity.
you believe only some parts of
a) Some (a sum) contradicts parts (each partial).
b) To believe implies partial holding onto partial, thereby shaping a sum...free will of choice implies partial apart from one another, while needing to resist the wanted temptation of summation as to remain free from one another.
c) Only implies all aka the one and only God (from the Christian perspective)...some/sum contradicts one and only.
No.
Again with the point behind nothing...if nothing has an end, then what's the beginning of nothing?
I was mentioning the verb. Not the noun a "magic spell"
The ION (action) in mention implies the origin of anything shaped within...verbs; nouns; adjectives etc.
The trick...a verb implies motion; nouns are attached to matter, while distracting from motion. Spelling nouns to distract from what verbs are implying...that's magic.
blah blah blah
Aka the yiddish "yada yada yada" (idle talk) from babylon/babel (confusion; disorder) + babble (talk like a baby)...a jew domesticates gentiles into build the tower of babel (words) which always collapses upon its foundation (sound).
Notice here... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CKyWu87W78 how yada yada yada leaves out the idle talk, yet implicates the noteworthy to a jew. That's why a jew doesn't have to listen to gentiles, since it's mostly yada yada yada aka bla bla bla... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6t8g6ka4W0
Btw: The Gigi D'Agostino clip is based on the comic LA LINEA (the line)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Linea_(TV_series) that's where gentiles are being tricked to shape their bla bla bla within.
S. p. e. l. l. <- THIS is spelling
a) You used free will of choice to choose what to spell...others suggested letters to tempt your free will of choice how to spell.
b) The letters you use are based on the ABC (Latin abecedary)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/abecedary That's the abracadabra utilized by few to cast spells onto many, and those under the spell are confining themselves through spelling from noticing the trick.
c) One spells by letters...others suggest letters to tempt ones free will of choice to LET one spell. Therefore...ones free will of choice represents the LETTER of any spelling by another.
The origin of letting implies all letting each one within wield free will of choice...that's why others have to use letters to tempts ones free will of choice into binding itself by letting.
I don't know where you got the idea that magic is involved here
a) Tempting another to ignore perceivable knowledge for suggested ideals/idols....that's magic.
b) Involvement aka in (within) volve (to turn) ment (mind)...others suggesting ideals/idols to trick ones mind to turn inwardly (logic) and outwardly (reason)...that's magic.
c) Holding up words within sound implies being UNDER THE SPELL, whence ignoring knowledge by seeking understanding.
d) The contradiction found within your descriptions contradict the knowledge moving through each being...free-will-of-choice struggles to free self from contradictions, which allows one to think straight.
Nothing is being destroyed by any fractals
Fractal implies destruction of whole aka de (to divide) struct (fractal structure) ion (whole action) as in...cause implies the acting whole; effect implies the fractal structure within. Power implies fractal within energy.
An even simpler example...if one opens a puzzle-box, then the pieces within represent the fractal destruction of the whole picture tempting one play a game of puzzle aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka mosaic law.
Puzzle implies mosaic aka summoning fractals together aka order out of chaos.
word worshiper
Sound implies worth...words tempts ship (instrument) to shipwreck by burdening self, while fighting other vessels. Pirates navigate sound, while shooting words at others ships to sink them.
If words had worth, then one wouldn't have to use words to describe worth to others. It's the consent of others aka their evaluation, which affixes worth aka value to suggested words.
Citation needed
Citate/citare - "to summon"...nature divides each being from one another; few suggest citations to artificially summon many together.
One needs to resist the wanted temptation of togetherness...otherwise one cannot sustain self aka apartheid.
Is that grammatically correct?
Cor (together) + rect/reg (to move in a straight line)...others suggest the word "correct" as grammar aka philology aka magic incantation... https://www.etymonline.com/word/grammar
Why? To distract many together (cor) from being moved in a straight line (rect) apart from one another.
Is that a real...or made up
WAS implies ones response (re) to all (al)...IS can only be made up within all that was.
Nope.
The narrow line of reality continues even if one "nopes" out of it into broader fiction. It's at the end of the line, when life doesn't have enough resistance anymore to venture into the temptation of broader fiction...when the nope (nihilism aka denial) disperses with force.
Establishes vs doesn't establish
Nature already does before an establishment comes into being. From doing towards establishment implies a straight line...not a versus/verto - "to turn" aka circular conflict.
You chose to add nothing to what everything does aka DOES-N'T (does nothing)...it's your choice which upholds the versus conflict.
matter vs no matter
No aka nothing/nihilo implies the denial within matter of the motion moving through matter. Denial implies turning inwards (logic) first before turning outwards (reason) against other matter.
Nature (inception towards death) doesn't turn into being (life)...nature nurtures natives by moving straight through, which life perceives as the inhaled spirit and the exhaled ghost.
to kill your worldview
To kill implies "to deprive of life"...to view/veue aka a visual perception implies "to see". Only withing the process of dying can life see.
Stop using your word games to interpret my comments
a) Nature cannot be stopped by any being within...consenting to one another's stop signs only distracts a temporal being from ongoing nature.
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Mcfadden-and-whitehead-aint-no-stoppin-us-now-lyrics
b) My vs yours implies the game of ignoring given choice by taking the chance to hold onto a side.
c) Interpretation implies being moved forwards (pret) internally (inter). Ones perception interprets all perceivable...no matter what another suggests one to do or not do.
Interpretation cannot be stopped...only ignored aka denied.
You're the only one obsessed with doing word games.
Obsession implies compulsion (oppsessive compulsive disorder) aka wanting to hold together...free-will-of-choice simply takes apart what others hold together by belief/faith/creed etc.
Notice that OCD is described as a circle... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obsessive%E2%80%93compulsive_disorder
Then notice that YOU'RE implies a you vs me + are vs aren't circle of conflict based on the compulsive obsession to hold onto a side.
Now what's the opposite of compulsive? FREE aka free will of choice...
then what other word do you propose we use then?
a) Nature doesn't propose words...sound pro (forwards) poses (position) instrument.
b) Free-will-of-choice doesn't propose alternative words...only describes fundamental sound and how alternation of words within tempts one to ignore that.
c) Sound implies singularity aka oneness of sound moving through each unit of instrument. The word WE implies a suggested pluralism, which tempts singular consent into a plural consensus with others.
Few suggest US (united states) and E PLURIBUS UNUM (out of many, one) to invert singularity (sound) into pluralism (words)...free-will-of-choice simply describes how that works.
d) Free-will-of-choice adapts to everything already available...guywholikesDjtof2024 seeks proposals for anything that isn't already available within everything.
guywholikesDjtof2024 was being tricked to play hide and seek willingly...free-will-of-choice cannot change that; only describe how it works.
If the term "you" is SO BAD
a) If implies then (implication)...bad implies vs good (reason). Circular reason tempts one to ignore linear implication.
b) Notice that term implies "limit"...therefore consenting to a term limits ones free will of choice. This magic is called "terminology" aka tempting one with terms into circular logic aka self confinement.
Fictitious vs real implies conflict
Only while responding (re) to all (al) can one shape fiction. To do that one has to turn (vs) away from all to one another...first inwardly (logic), then outwardly (reason).
The circle within self (logic) represents the fiction one ignores the linear procession of reality for...the circle outside self (reason) represents others setting up a ring for one to fight others within. A kike/kikel - "circle" tempts each gentile to draw a circle within self, which in return permits each jew to draw circles around gentiles from outside.
Do you have a dictionary source for that? (everything forwards each thing; nothing denies that)
a) Nature delineates...few within suggest dictionaries to dictate many.
b) Ask yourself what came first...every (whole) or each (partial)?
Thanks for admitting I wasn't wrong.
Notice that a circle (right vs wrong or was vs wasn't) denies admission. Notice that reason (outwards circle) is shaped by logic (inward circle)...so drawing a circle within self admits self into an outwardly circle against others, hence no outward admission required.
One line crashing into another.
a) If God implies the first line, then what's the second line?
b) Can motion crush into motion or does it require matter within motion to establish a crash?
c) Doesn't change of direction imply motion as the director of any change of matter within?
d) If line implies delineation, then crashing implies a turning against one another within the same line of delineation like ouroboros eating its own tail.
Take two rectangular wood plank
a) Doesn't each wood plank have a different position from one another for oneself to take two together?
b) How does one know that it's two? By taking first one, then another one...
c) Ready for some fraternal hazing? If you get hit by the first one, then will you respond differently to the second one or will it feel the same? If it's different, then why do you use the same label (two) for each different plank?
Do they magically make a circle or are they still linear?
First of all...the planks where artificially shaped out of a natural tree, and it's therefore the life-line of a living tree growing within the process of dying, which implies the source of delineation...not the planks you milled into shape.
Secondly...the circle isn't about the shape of the planks, but originates from your logic putting one natural thing and another natural thing into an artificial "two", which implies you TURNING from natural towards artificial.
Now compare natural delineation with artificial circulation. What has a longer lifeline...the natural tree or the artificial planks milled out of it? The reduction of life is based on the circular conflict within your mind.
you'll lose against reality
RE (to respond) AL (all)...all implies loss; each one within implies responding growth. Loss and growth aren't turning against one another, but imply a delineation within one another.
Reality doesn't play those word games.
Indeed...yet adding "doesn't" to reality implies the use of given choice to take a chance aka gambling aka playing a game. It's the words which betray ones intent.
Tala Kaddoura suggesting narratives (not all jews; holocaust; racism; colonialism; white supremacy) under disguise of child exploitation to tempt consensus among gentiles.
Do any of those narratives benefit gentiles?
Wrong.
In that picture this represents choosing a side in-between right or wrong, hence into the mutual conflict; into the broad deception, and away from the narrow path.
failed beliefs
The narrow path implies rising (life) and falling (inception towards death) simultaneously, while beliefs tempt one to hold onto broad narratives suggested by others, which makes rising harder, while one falls tumbling.
You can't spell Choice...
A spell is shaped by letters aka ones free will of choice LETTING another shape.
Mechanism implies the use of -ism as a mēkhanē (device; tool)...few suggest -isms to tempt many into a consensus of their own device, hence making tools out of them.
Consenting to a suggestion TURNS on away from perceivable and against (anti) one another, which contradicts christ (to anoint aka to separate from one another).
Nation implies native (nati) of action (ion) hence being (life) passed (inception towards death).
Chaos/khnwos/ghieh - "to yawn, gape, be wide open"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/chaos
For aka forwards implies the natural order opening wide (inception towards death) each chaotic being (life) within. Few suggest order out of chaos to distract many from discerning self to be chaos within order.
To bring (inception towards death) peace/piece (life) aka whole nature separating into each partial being.
There can be only one, which gives each one within free will of CHOICE...taking a chance tempts one to ignore given choice.