1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +2 / -1

Can you show me an example of AI adapting to inspiration instead of information?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) Questioning "when" permits those who answer to date/datus/dare - "to give; grant; offer", which ones consent to the answer then takes.

b) The natural order doesn't generate "common people", but each unique person. Ones consent to suggested common-ism and popul-ism permits few to ordain many into groups.

c) A birth implies a setting apart of an off-spring. Few exploit birth-daze to date birth, hence gaining control over an affixed date, while distracting each off-spring from the passage of self-discernment aka the coming into being from origin.

Thanks to birthdays...ones origin can be buried within calendars, which makes one accountable to others, who also utilize numbers to distract ONE from discerning self. Calendars utilize DAZE (days) of the WEAK (week) to distract from sun (son) and moon (month).

d) Celebrate/celeber - "frequented, crowded"... a suggested inversion of action (perceivable) setting frequent reactions (perception) apart from one another. Consenting to a suggestion crowds many frequencies together, hence distorting them.

In other words...each ones free will of choice implies frequent adaptation, while following the choices of others lowers ones frequency.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +2 / -1

Can you show me a bot that can respond like this? A bot that can adapt to inspiration?

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

definition of politics is "who gets what"

a) To define implies to affix..."who gets what" implies moving distribution. A contradiction. Few tempt many to wholesale think in contradictions, while ignoring what they got, which in return permits few to get it.

b) Politic/polis - "enclosed space; ones city" aka ones free will of choice, enclosed within self until freely opened up to others. A politician tricks ones private free will of choice to become public domain by voting representatives aka selecting a chosen one.

enemies

Enemy aka en (in) emy/amy/ama - "to take, hold"...hence the enemy within self when taking and holding onto what another suggests, which then establishes a conflict of reason between amity vs enmity.

to the victor go the spoils

Because the conflict in-between winning vs loosing spoils both participants. The one spoiled less is declared the winner/victor.

the very core of the meaning of the word

Suggested words and attached meaning distract one from being the perceiving core within perceivable sound.

what, when, where and why

What? Energy! When? Now! Where? Here! Why? Causing (inception towards death) effects (life)!

MEANS by which there are decisions

Only ones choice can decide...others suggest meaning to tempt ones choice to select a chosen ones suggestion as the deciding factor; noun - "commercial agent, deputy, one who buys or sells for another"

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

hate honesty

To HONE implies sharpening an edge from both sides...reasoning (love vs hate) implies inclining to one side, while fighting the other. That's how few manage to blunt and dull many.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

a) Certain/certus - "fixed" contradicts birth/bear/bher - "to carry forth"...

b) Few suggest date/datus/dare - "to give", hence daring many to take.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +2 / -1

a) Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) can only strengthen itself by resisting.

b) To affirm implies ad (towards) firmus (strength), hence affirmation tempting form to seek strength by moving forwards with flow.

c) AI mimics confirmation aka con (together) firmus (strength), while tempting affirmation from consenting users. This establishes a feedback loop where the strength of a user seeking af-firmation is drained by artificially joining with con-firmation.

In short...seeking affirmation is self destructive, hence a suicidal tendency of being (life) towards outcome (death).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +2 / -1

The United States is an occupied government - this is am example of (jewish) power structure.

To unite states is how a jew structures power...

"The jewish people as a whole is its own Messiah. Its kingdom over the universe is obtained through the uniting of other human races, through the suppression of frontiers and monarchies, which are bulwarks for particularism and hinder the erection of a world republic where citizenship is everywhere recognized to the jew. In this new organization of mankind the sons of Israel, who at present are scattered over the entire earths surface, will all be the same race and of the same traditional culture, without, however, forming another nationality, and be without contradiction the leading element in all parts, particularly if it is successful in laying upon the masses of workers a permanent leadership by some jews. The governments of peoples all pass with the formation of the universal republic effortlessly into the hands of the Israelites in favour of the victory of the proletariat. Then the personal property of the rulers will be able to be suppressed by the rulers of the jewish race who will everywhere govern over the property of the peoples. Then the promise of the Talmud will be fulfilled, that when the time of the Messiah has come, the jews will have the goods of all peoples of the world in their possession."

~From a letter by Baruch Levy sent to Karl Marx

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

cradle of civilization

a) A cradle rocks to and fro aka balancing the choice at center. A civilization implies many joined together around centers (cities), which imbalances each ones choice.

b) Rocking to and fro allows a cradle to mimic ones choice of adaptation as free will of choice (matter) towards (motion) balance (momentum).

Few "rock and roll" many together into conflicts of reason (circular logic) against each other.

Sleight of hand: The pioneering rock song "rock around the clock" was written by Max C. Freedman (maximum seeing freed man)... https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/billhaleyhiscomets/rockaroundtheclock.html

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

reverse psychology

Psycho/psyche - "animating power" implies motion; velocity; forwards direction. It's those within (life) animation (inception towards death) turning against (verse/versus) each other, within conflicts of reason (logy/logic), that represent reverse psychology.

made to sell

Tempted (suggestion) to buy (consent), while selling self out (free will of choice)...

Ones choice can only sell self out by selecting/buying into a chosen ones offer.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

centres of civilization

Civil implies public (plural); centre implies private (singular). Each one implies center of all...few suggest civil centers (cities) to draw many together, which positions few at center of many, with the sole power to cut off circumference (circumcise).

everywhere Babylon is, Babylon will fall

a) Only during fall (inception towards death) can one rise (life)

b) BA'BEL, noun (Heb) - "confusion; disorder" build up always collapses upon its foundation...within the natural order.

Confusion implies the fusing together (con) of many, hence dividing each thereof (dis) from natural order and against each other.

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ar-yan aka or-ion aka OR (choice between alternative) ION (action)...

Aka alternating reactions (life) within action (inception towards death) aka the ship (matter) within the mother (momentum) of father (motion).

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

We started with a simple question about existence. About being thrown into consciousness without asking for it.

Started with a question...without asking.

consciousness

Con (together) contradicts scious/scire (to know)...knowing implies each ones perception within all perceivable, hence a setting apart from one another to allow awareness of one another.

Senses are sensing moving differences...few equalize differences among many by establishing a hivemind aka a con-scious (knowing together). That's why many aren't aware of what few are up to.

being thrown into

That implies taking a being from somewhere and throwing it somewhere else...an inversion of reality, where each one is thrown (inception towards death) into being (life).

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +2 / -2

Christmas = Christ-Mass Parade - A Mass of people Parading For Jesus Christ

a) Christ (anointed one) + mass/missa/mittere - "dismissal; to let go; send"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/mass#etymonline_v_9684

Sending (inception towards death) each anointed one (life) apart from one another...that's what "christ-mas" implies.

b) Before a people (plural) can be amassed together, each one implies a person (singular)...

c) FOR implies being (life) forwarded (inception towards death), hence moved A CROSS, which each one needs to resist, hence the symbolic use of X-mas.

Who would attack a mass of people

Nature generates each person...a jew amasses gentiles into a people aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together), which nature continuously sets apart aka velocity (inception towards death) separating resistance (life).

That's why no civilization; nation; society; community; group; family; collective etc. can sustain itself for long...and only a few remain.

Who is Anti-Christ?

Each ones (christ) choice to turn against (anti) another.

synagogue

Aka SYN (together) AGEIN (put in motion, move)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/synagogue#etymonline_v_22521

It's the amassed gentiles which represent the synagogue, within which each jew operates as satan/stn - "one who opposes, obstructs, or acts as an adversary" aka diabolos - "slanderer; one who throws something A CROSS the path of another"

That something thrown across implies the kike/kikel/circle aka circular logic within self tempting conflicts of reason against others. Logic implies the obstruction within self, reason the mutual conflict among adversaries.

the goverment...

...controls (govern) the mind (ment) by tempting mass consent with suggestions from few.

The german...is controlled

Control implies "rolled together"...which obstructs GERM-ination.

It is demoralizing that ZOG is not attacked, but instead scapegoats or plebians at random.

Morals implies the conflict between right vs wrong; good vs bad...a conflict of reason among gentiles stoked by a jew from both sides through talmudic reasoning.

The random attacks are designed to frighten (Latin terrere), hence a jew suggesting terror-ism to brand each consenting gentile a terror-ist. That's what the "war on terror" is about, and of course it's mocking and testing a MASS of CHRISTians with "do not be afraid"...

Christian Zionists, who...

...willingly gave consent to follow suggested zionism.

indirectly responsible

Only within direction (inception towards death) can one respond (life) to being directed.

Ones response-ability (free will of choice) cannot be shared...only ignored.

damning themselves in the process

The process implies ones life sentenced from inception towards point of death, hence each inception of life implying a death sentence, hence living within the process of dying.

Damn/dap - "to apportion in exchange"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/damn#etymonline_v_752 aka apportion (division into portions) as expression (life) within change (inception towards death).

Living implies damnation; the process of dying implies salvation...hence dissolving each portion within.

allies

a) ALL LIES...and yet gentiles keep falling for it.

b) ALL cannot "ally"...what would all ally with? More than all?

c) Ally/alligare - "to bind one thing to another"...tempts one to ignore that all sets each one apart from one another, or from the christian perspective...God (all) setting apart each Christ (one).

A jew suggests religion/religio - "to bind anew" to trick ONES CHOICE to select a CHOSEN ONES suggestion.

misplaced loyalties and zionist cultism.

One misses ones place (perception) within all (perceivable) when consenting to suggested loyalism; zionism or cultism by another. It's consent to an -ism which makes one a loyalist; zionist and cultist.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

a) Not for those believing in it aka those WILLING it into existence. Look who has more power...those holding onto truth or those shaping lies.

Notice that those holding onto are restricting their ability to wander (space), while those who shape are free to make others wander/wonder internally.

b) To know implies to perceive, while a hoax can only be suggested. One perceives things within motion, hence space/spatior - "to wander", yet ones consent to a suggested hoax tempt one to hold onto it, hence ignoring motion.

c) A jew suggests space as a place outside of self to wander to (or wonder about), which tempts those who consent to ignore that space/spatior - "to wander" implies oneself wandering.

It's a dirty little trick, but it works because ones free will of choice has the power to will the shaping of fiction into reality...even if it's just within ones mind/memory.

You know space is a hoax

Phrasing it like that, even without the question mark, tempts others into a conflict of reason aka confirm vs denial...only the jew suggesting space benefits from that conflict among gentiles.

hoax

Whatever hoax a jew shapes can only be shaped within reality, hence it needs to use all the building blocks reality offers to shape the fiction that distracts a consenting one from reality.

Here's a sleight of hand for space... https://genius.com/Babylon-zoo-spaceman-lyrics and here's the jew connection... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qqg6MJeL_k

Edit: Notice that "space is fake and gay" represents a CATCH-PHRASE aka the use of phraseoLOGY to catch those who consent within circular logic and conflicts of reason against others.

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +3 / -3

to blame

Implies one blaspheming all by finding fault with another.

Christians

There can be only one Christ...pluralism (Christians) was suggested by few to tempt consenting many together, which in return offers easy pickings to few.

through a Christmas Parade

Not a parade...a market, where few tempt many to sell out by buying into.

Parade/parare/pere - "to produce"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/parade#etymonline_v_7166

All produces each one, which in return permits each one to re-produce. Any sold product tempts those buying into it to ignore that, hence ignoring reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggested).

Buying from another tempts each Christian to ignore God.

Who is responsible?

Questioning another distracts from ones response-ability (free will of choice)...which cannot be shared; only ignored.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

space is fake

Space/spatium/spatior - "to wander"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/space

One can only wander within all...not "outer space". Only one within all can experience extension outwards aka growth.

strand in space

Strand/ster - "to stretch out"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/strand#etymonline_v_22144

Hence one wandering (space) within (in) all stretching (strand) outwards.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I do think I stand together with a multitude

a) Thinking implies in response to origin, hence to all perceivable ones perception already GOT access to. Others suggest one to think about outcome, hence tempting one to GET.

b) Together implies "towards getting"...being alive implies, while being moved from inception TOWARDS death. That's what one gets, when ignoring to sustain what one got.

c) Coming through the birth channel implies as off-spring aka as each separated one. Few suggest pluralism; multiculturalism; collectivism; abrahamism (father of multitude) etc. to tempt many to join each other, which in return permits few to remain apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806

d) Standing implies balancing as matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion, hence during a process of separation between velocity and resistance, which is why both young and old are struggling to stand and find balance.

I speak that way

Way (inception towards death) separates each I (life) from one another, which only then allows speaking to one another.

Few suggest aboutism to trick many to think together about suggested information, while ignoring that way (all perceivable) set each I (ones perception) apart from one another. It's ones consent to suggested words which tempts one to think its about togetherness.

Hivemind brings a negative connotation to my mind

a) Negative implies vs positive aka a conflict of reason, already within your mind. You are viewing perceivable balance through a lens of suggested imbalance, hence connotate; verb - "to signify secondarily"...and you chose to do that to yourself by consenting to suggestions by another.

b) Circular logic implies ones mind closed to perceivable, while reason implies a conflict against others (within a ring) about suggested, and logic/reason is based on logos aka the suggested word, distracting one from perceivable sound.

c) Positive implies ones POSI-tion aka posited (life) within action (inception towards death), while negative implies ones de-nial (Latin nihilo, nothing) thereof, when consenting to suggestions by another.

There's no conflict between positive vs negative in nature...until one ignores natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested).

the common era

There's only each ones unique (life) era (inception towards death)...few suggest common-ism to lure unique ones together, and era/epoch aka epi (on) ekhein (to hold) to tempt many to hold onto fictitious eras, while ignoring that real era cannot be held onto, since it moves ones being.

Furthermore...suggested THE-ism tempts ones consent to give another authority over self.

I share a mind to a point

a) Being implies each life sentenced from inception towards point of death.

b) If one takes possession over self as "me; myself or I", then that contradicts sharing with others.

c) Only all (perceivable) shares with each one (perception) through separation...sharing among one another by giving (to sell) and taking (to buy) ignores each ones FREE will of choice.

like crossing from death to life

a) Only during the process of dying (inception towards death) can life grow aka A CROSS each one bears.

b) The ongoing process of dying implies "same"; each life within implies "different"...few distract many from that by suggesting them to respond "alike", hence the hivemind; order following; npc behavior.

c) Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); form to flow (death) aka transformation of ingredients out of base alchemy.

d) Crossing simply implies the momentum between motion (dying) and matter (living) simultaneously.

passing from a state of not knowing God to then knowing Him

a) God implies all known (perceivable) passing through each one being (perception)...by internal/inherent separation of all into each one.

b) Motion implies him; momentum implies her; matter implies a trans-form-ation of him through her into each FE (minine) MALE aka WO (mb) MAN aka S(plit) HE.

There can be only one father (motion) and one mother (momentum) for each one off-spring (matter).

c) Know-ledge implies a separation, hence "livin on the edge"... https://genius.com/Aerosmith-livin-on-the-edge-lyrics

nailed Himself to the cross' before anything pierced His skin

Christ (anointed one) implies being (life) moved A CROSS (inception towards death)...wielding the free will of choice to nail self by permitting the suggestions by others to pierce one, hence the nailing happening before the piercing.

What's the nail then? Suggested NIHIL-ism and ones de-NIAL of perceivable for it...nothing/nihil/nial/nail.

Thank you

YOU (phonetic jew)... imagine the chutzpah to trick the entire world to say "thank jew" over and over again.

Each one is made in the image of God

God implies (unmoving) mover aka first cause (action) for each secondary effect (reaction). An image implies "artificial representation; copy"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/image#etymonline_v_1520 hence playing within ones "imagination".

Made/make/mag - "to knead; fashion,fit" is the foundation of MAGIC, hence few utilizing suggestion to shape the imagination of consenting many.

what specifications

Specific implies particular, hence a sePARation of whole (all) into partials (one) aka of God into each Christ.

I haven't figured out completely yet

A figure (partial) can only exist within (whole) and thereby during separation of flow (motion) into form (matter).

Few suggest complete aka com (together) plere (to fill) to fulfill that which many "fail to live up to".

The difference between each one and the one Christ is that He is sinless

Sin implies what one takes on, hence holds onto. Few suggest the sinless Christ as a "self sacrificing" redeemer of the sinning multitude.

How does one (singular) become part of many? Joining aka giving consent to a suggestion sold aka entering a contract aka binding self aka holding onto aka falling for the temptation of sin aka shirking ones response-ability (free will of choice) onto a chosen one, who in return offer redemption (buy back, ransom, recover by purchase) in form of a redeemer outside of self.

If one says "Christ died for our sins"; then OUR (suggested pluralism) implies ONES (consent) sin.

the grip of death...

...implies the living choosing to hold onto anything within the moving process of dying.

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +4 / -1

a) The only weapon of offense/defense is ones free will of choice.

b) A suggested narrative can only "hit" if one willingly consents to it, hence taking the hit.

c) Reality moves perceivable sound; fiction tempts one to hold onto suggested words. Using words to distract from sound implies spell-craft.

d) Sound was silent before words can be shaped into noise...

  • People talking without speaking
  • People hearing without listening
  • No one dared...disturb the sound of silence
1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

All is always open when a pike is shoved...

a) Shove - "push along by direct, continuous strength; attempt to move by pushing"...if life chooses to shove, while being moved from inception towards death, then life dies faster. Shoving others towards death implies the one shoving to also aiming at death, hence falling for a temptation instead of sustaining life by resisting temptation.

b) All allows each ones mind to be open, while aiming a pike at another one, focuses ones mind onto a target, hence closing ones mind off from all.

No matter how many pikes one used to impale others...one can never reach the target. Why? Because closing ones mind to a target draws more targets from all, as in...nature generates what each being wills within aka "ask and ye shall receive".

The pope will answer for his heresy

Ones consent to suggested THE-ism tempts one to call another father (pope), hence committing HEAR-SAY (here-sy).

Sleight of hand by Danzig... https://genius.com/Danzig-mother-lyrics

  • Mother...tell your children not to hear my words
  • Father...not about to see your light
1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

we should be closed/dead to evil

a) One implies "free" from one another, we implies "joined" together aka open to choose freely or enclosed within a controlled environment.

b) BE implies "being" alive; TO implies being moved from inception "towards" death.

I think we

Aka singular (I) thinking plural (we)...that's an issue aka an artificial common way of thinking aka a so called "hivemind".

I know a word like passed/crossed over

Nature moves sound, which crosses thorough/passes over each one within. Words are passed across one another in exchange for holding onto them aka to affix them mentally as a "definition; meaning; imported significance".

Reality (perceivable sound) moves across; fiction (suggested words) nails one to the cross.

one who has crossed over to the Christ

a) Each anointed one implies Christ (life) crossing over (inception towards death). Coming through the birth channel implies ones anointment and the wicker/wican - "to give way" (inception towards death) of Christ (life).

b) If EACH one implies Christ, then wouldn't that explain why a jew is seen as both being against all non jews, and simultaneously self hating?

If one positions Christ and anti-Christ within self, then sustaining self by resisting outside temptations, implies a struggle within each one being (life) passed over/moved across (inception towards death).

c) Which part of the story of Christ doesn't describe each living being? What is the difference between Christ and each life coming into being? Isn't speaking in the name of Christ tempting one to ignore ones own voice?

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

Portal aka a port within all where vessels (life) are loaded (inception) and unloaded (death). Hence...port/prtu/per - "to pass over".

The trick...all is always open, while each one within can be tempted to close self to it.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

required to offer

Neither offering (selling) nor taking (buying) are requirements, yet... "ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you".

Why is that? Because free will of choice can only operate in-between need and want. As in...one choosing to resist (need) temptation (want) doesn't make it less tempting for others to fall for.

identity

Identical implies "same"...being implies different from one another. ONE cannot have an identity unless one ignores self for joining others, hence becoming part of the unwashed masses, which are ruled by identity thieves using identity politics to spread idealism.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Heresy/hairesis - "a taking or choosing for oneself, a choice, a means of taking"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/heresy#etymonline_v_9184

-ISM implies the suggestion of another tempting ones free will of choice to give consent by taking the suggested, hence by becoming a HERE-TIC aka one who HEARs+TAKEs...instead of just listening to a moving nature which cannot be taken by those within.

view more: Next ›