Ever read Superman: Red Son? Dude would be a tyrant.
No, that's the point.
Everyone here is always "oh, that guy is compromised" or "he's a crypto Jew" or "that's a woman and women should be in the kitchen" or "that guy back in 1996 said nice things about Saddam Hussain" or "that guy is wrong denomination of Christian" etc. etc.
Show me your perfect candidate.
You watch, soon, someone will come along and say there is no such thing because the whole system is bunk. While I can't disagree, then I'd say show me the perfect Caesar to overthrow it for us.
Apathy is dangerous to the soul is all.
I would say lots of people care, just the wrong people to make it matter in terms of justice.
Do you care?
So not just the moan landing was a hoax, but the entire Cold War?
Wars in Korea, Vietnam, and countless other places where the US and Soviets fomented insurrections is very strong evidence that you're wrong. What say you?
Lots of people care, including you and me and the people who wrote that article. Therefore, you're demonstrably wrong.
What you mean to say, is "nobody with prosecutorial power cares."
“Let an idiot, remain an idiot”
People in glass houses should not throw stones.
lol
Do you know what a tautology is?
Yes, there is an objective truth. I happen to believe that man walked on the moon, you happen to believe he hasn't. Neither you, nor I, in the conversation, will be able to convince the other that our subjective truth is more in line with the objective truth (especially when you're spouting silliness and insults).
Also, you need to calm down.
Maybe I remember when I was told Santa wasn't real, maybe I don't. I certainly don't remember when as a child I was first told of Santa. Do you?
Are you unable to answer? When did you first learn 3x3=9? That man walked on the moon is the same.
The distance from the earth to the moon is between 225k and 250k miles, you're wrong right off the bat there mon ami. And the moon isn't really "up" when you're travelling to it, because you can go in a straight line. I stopped reading after that.
It's also very sad that you assume that just because I have a different truth than you, that man walked on the moon, that I'm not a pureblood? Total lack of logic, which impugns the rest of your arguments by extension.
Do you know when you first learned certain commonplace facts, like the square root of 64 is 8, or 3x3=9, or that the moon causes tides, etc. etc.?
Of course you don't. That man walked on the moon is, in reality, one of those commonplace things to learn, that remembering the first moment it was taught to you is rather unremarkable.
Worse, he was best friends with America's current Secretary of Transportation.
Do you remember when you first learned it?
Like you're coming up with your own unique take on why we didn't go to the moon, that you didn't just hear somewhere yourself.
I'm sorry, but you don't get to dictate the terms of the debate. I don't accept that, and you have no authority to enforce it.
As to your four points.
-
At the height of the Cold War, it would certainly behoove Russia to expose a fraud, and they had spies honeycombed throughout the defense network. But they didn't. Why?
-
If it was a hoax, the question isn't so much why it didn't get outed then, but the inevitable outing of it as a hoax in the future when man, continuing space exploration, would inevitably go to the moon again.
-
If you understood the vast gulfs of space and the limited power of the visual telescopes to see small objects you would drop this entirely as an objection. Even if there was pictures where you could see the rover, you'd call them fake. Still, you can see the disturbances on the ground caused by the missions, like seeing a hole that was dug even if you can't see the shovel.
-
God help you if you ever get charged with a crime and you've never heard of the concept of chain of custody. It is true is that meteorites thought from the moon get misidentified. It's also true that the moon used to be part of the earth and to layman they are indistinguishable. It's true there are hoaxes. It's also true that fake moon rocks show up from time to time without chain of custody, and occasionally real moon rocks do without chain of custody as well. But moon rocks with a chain of custody of NASA only ownership, that's not true.
Do you remember when or where you learned the words "consume" or "contingency"? Probably not. That is a form of amnesia, believe it or not.
That's a long way of saying, I don't remember what evidence, learned in the past, convinced me. I have been on this earth over 4 decades now. If you want confirmatory evidence I've looked at recently, we can talk about that.
They aren't special effects, therefore, they don't have to be good or bad.
Come now, let's be adults here.
It's not that you are gullible, either, for believing wrong things. I suppose you are a fairly intelligent man, who came to the conclusions you did not by accident.
When they lie about space, it's to lie about alien technology they possess, and how much weaponization of such is going on.
NOW, just NOW, we are getting somewhere.
As an Orthodox Christian, then you must make a place for nonmaterialistic explanations for certain phenomena. The line between "dead" and "alive" is fundamental. We can both agree that it is exists, even if the borders of when this binary state switches from one to the other.
Please show me where, with measurements, I can determine the existence of the soul, or at the very least, human will?
Whenever someone says "obviously" or "clearly" they don't have a very good argument to make, so they are going about begging the question.
So the Q psyop said to stop talking about the flat earth psyop? Fucking hilarious.
All I can think of Ghostbusters, and the warnings about not crossing the streams.
Stress, anxiety, and depression do not exist?
We had better let Shakespeare know that his entire body of work contains things that you say are not real. I'll never read Hamlet again. hahahhahaha
You are a materialist. Not unheard of in the modern world, but also entirely irrational.
Let me ask the question again. Do you also believe that IQ isn't real, at least how we measure it?
In Superman: Red Son (note the play on words here) he crash lands in Ukraine instead of Kansas. With his intelligence and powers, he is able to make the USSR the dominant world power. It's benevolently run, at least as how much communism could be, because it's Superman and all, but it's still a tyranny.
Eventually he takes over the world, except for the US, where Lex Luthor is determined to keep the USA free.
Originally a graphic novel, they made an animated movie of it, I'm sure you could find it for free somewhere.