It's Yahweh/Enlil. The Anunnaki apparently have some concept about trading off rulership with every zodialcal age, which we would conventionally take to be 2160 years. All that stuff in the Bible about "the end of the age"? That's exactly what they're referring to.
The people who think the Bible and other works were all about astrotheology are kinda correct in this aspect. Their theories then fall off the line of reasoning because, for them, the ancients were very concerned about the doings of the stars for no reason at all.
I mean, can you even imagine being concerned with tracking the precessional cycle? That's like being a 10yo boy and noting when a certain star rose, then being an 82yo man and noting that same star rose 10 minutes earlier. It's ludicrous to believe people just thought this stuff up one day.
Clearly this is true, and the West would be crazy to provoke a pan-European war. Then one must consider whether "They" have an interest in destroying Western military potential. For the life of me, I can't think of a sensible reason.
All that being said, I think They will still try. The reason is that They are so desperate, They think a war--any war--might just shake something loose in Their favor, or at least give Them some room to maneuver.
They can bullshit all of us all They want, but the Russians are creating facts on the ground and that's a huge problem for Them.
I'd say photoshop. Dad and daughter are not in the same picture, or even generated together. The right side of his face is slightly lighter. On her, the lighting is even, and perhaps slightly from her left. An AI wouldn't make that mistake, but a human would.
The clues are extremely tiny, but here's how it shapes up: a deal was struck between Yahweh and Satan which took effect around 600 BC. Yahweh and his forces withdrew while Satan and the Fallen Angels remained.
The nature of it seems to be something like this: if, in a given period of time, Satan could come to dominate the world and the human race, then he could keep rulership. Humans, virtually all of whom were unconscious up to this time, were to be given a tool to resist: some small fraction of them would receive higher consciousness. I think you may be able to see that consciousness is all we need to free ourselves from our current situation.
The mechanism I believe has something to do with the pineal gland. I would also presume it's a recessive genetic trait. Thus, getting upset with people that "don't get it" is like yelling at the colorblind for their failure to try hard enough. I'm sure you know there is virtually no research available along these lines.
As I say, the evidence for the whole idea is scant and fragmentary. One of the more obvious points is where Jesus is confronted by Satan in the desert. Satan offers him the world. Note, though, that Jesus does not contest that. IOW, he recognizes that the world is Satan's to give. And so it is, if Satan prevails in the deal that has been struck.
Now your microscope must be well focused when you tale a look at this verse (Matthew 8:29):
And, behold, they cried out, saying, What have we to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God? art thou come hither to torment us before the time?
Biblical scholars are silent on this, but if pressed I'm sure they would just wave their hands around and talk about Revelation and the End Times or some such. My concept is much more finely tuned.
These "demons" are the un-reincarnated spirits of giants, who were the offspring of the "bene Elohim" and human women, now trapped on Earth and living off loosh. We see that they are aware of who Jesus really is, and they are also aware of the deal that has been put in place. Their fate rests with the outcome of that deal.
Finally, you know that "revelation of the method" thing that conspiracists always talk about? The prevailing idea is that it has to do with karma. Satan and the Elites afraid of karma? Well, maybe. But again, my idea is more concrete. Someone is coming back to make sure that the rules of the contest were followed, and violation equals forfeit. That's something real to keep Satan and his followers in line.
There is strong circumstantial evidence to indicate that almost no one was conscious before about 600 BC. The most crucial aspect for finding that evidence is that you have to have the idea firmly in mind before you can properly interpret the evidence that's been in front of you all along.
Take, more or less at random, the Book of Isaiah, which is from the other side of that Great Divide of Consciousness. First chapter, first verse, we find:
The vision of Isaiah the son of Amoz, which he saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem in the days of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah, kings of Judah.
What an exceedingly strange way to put it. If Isaiah wrote it, why not just say, "My name is Isaiah and this is what I saw"? The same applies if someone pretending to be Isaiah wrote it. And if that author wanted to write honestly, he could simply say, "My name is So-and-so, and I heard from a guy who heard from a guy who heard from Isaiah that...." I claim that we get this odd third person phraseology because Isaiah was not conscious.
First chapter, second verse, we find:
Hear, O heavens, and give ear, O earth: for the LORD hath spoken, I have nourished and brought up children, and they have rebelled against me.
Well, it's not like they had some rule against speaking in first person because here is Yahweh doing just that. Why the difference? Yahweh is conscious and speaks in first person.
Try to find any Biblical exegesis explaining this, or even recognizing the difference. You won't. It's just like not having your microscope properly focused: there are a lot of things you simply will not see. That's why I said you had to have the idea firmly in mind.
The 600 BC date comes from the Axial Age, plus much additional evidence. I believe I may have mentioned it before. The exact circumstances of that transition I have yet to fully understand, but it's a much longer story and has nothing to do with the Creator of the Universe or Evolution or anything like that.
Bizarrely, this is even a step back from the fake-ass NZ "mosque massacre". In that one, keeping true to video game style, shell casings were ejected from the gun but never appeared on the ground. The laughable part there was when he fired a shotgun at the windshield of his car but only created a smoke stain.
I guess next we're going to get stick figures going "pew-pew".
For me, these are yet more confirmations that the split among human consciousnesses follows the 80-20 rule: 80% NPC, 16% "in-between", and 4% fully conscious.
But let me trace through the particular manifestation seen in the Milgram experiment. Let me first state that I have separately determined that higher consciousness and an innate moral sense are one and the same phenomenon. Those without higher consciousness, and thus without an innate moral sense, superficially mimic it by "following a moral code". This "external morality" comes from those who that person accepts as "authorities", typically religious and/or political powers and systems. In this, they simply seek external reward or try to avoid external punishment.
So in this case the "experimenter" is accepted by those certain subjects as the authority. He's got a white coat and a clipboard, doesn't he? Nothing they do is immoral because the moral authority has not indicated otherwise.
Interesting note: I heard many years ago that for some of the subjects in this experiment, the higher the compulsion from the experimenter, the more firmly they resisted. I suspect these were the fully conscious subjects.
Interesting note #2: I met a couple of people a few years ago that had recently graduated from the local state university with bachelor's degrees in psychology. Neither one had ever even heard of either this experiment or the Stanford Prison Experiment, let alone studied them.
The interesting aspect here is to deconstruct and analyze the event at higher levels. The tweet is what's being flogged at one of the higher levels.
At the base level, the shoeple receive it passively as yet another "mAsS sHooTiNg! gUnS r BaD!"
At one level higher, the hook has been baited with a tranny. Those so inclined bite down hard and take it as, "All this pro-trans BS has driven these freaks to murder!"
At one level higher, we get this tweet of conspiracy multiplied by conspiracy: "This FF proves that we are under threat from...." This is for the conspiratards that have followed the red string right up heir own buttholes and can't find their way back out.
One can plainly see that the common factor here is mortal fear. The only difference here is what They are telling you to be fearful of.
Well, am I here to sell fear as well? Just the opposite. Look how desperate They are to create fear, and how lame and transparent Their efforts are. Be fearful of these bullshit artists if that is what you wish, but I'll pass. Neither am I fearful of the retards that buy into any of this, but I simply recognize that they exist, and that their entrainment and manipulability is a hindrance to the freedom of the human race.
I am amazed once again at just how far the vast majority of the human race lives from reality, and all by choice and consent.
It's way, way, way beyond that.
Back in the Trump era, Kim Jong-un was all over the mainstream because he made some terrifying nuclear threat. So I checked KCNA and the most notable story that day was about a new postage stamp.
So they just make stuff up, including direct quotes. They know no one is checking and they are absolutely correct about that. If this is the first you've heard about such a thing, well, that's your proof, isn't it?
Just a tangent on NK: I think the West has a very inaccurate idea of what goes on in the DPRK and it's relations with the rest of the world. Almost everything we get is from CIA newsletters.
I've watched a good number of South Korean shows on Netflix, and a couple of them heavily involved North Korea. I was quite surprised that the Northerners weren't portrayed as threatening or villains. In one of them, the hero and love interest was a DPRK military officer. And AFAIK, this is produced by Southerners for South Korean audiences.
Also, I found out Pyongyang has an international airport. Doesn't seem very "Hermit Kingdom"-y, does it?
My favorite aspect so far is from the security camera footage. The lot out front has marked spots for seniors. It's funny that they need that because in that one view only 4 of them have cars. Oh, and no one else has any.
Second favorite aspect from the same footage: The "perp" is driving through the lot then turns farther from the building. Hey dipshit, you don't need to park far away to avoid door dings because the lot is virtually empty! Plus, aren't you basically planning on being dead by the end of this?
Belarus is locked, cocked, and right on the border with Ukraine, but even they make public statements from time to time that they have no wish to become embroiled in a conflict Russia already has well in hand.
To me, this reads like the Neo-Imperialists trying to amp up war hysteria. They need war, any war, and it looks like the current one will be winding up soon and not in their favor. If the masses aren't frightened enough of the commies and the chinks, then how about the fanatical chink-commies of "The Hermit Kingdom"?
In the meantime, NK is trying to break free of state capture, and I would imagine their military priority is, if it looks like they're going to be successful, resisting real capture.
Technical gun nut note: the weapon appears to be a KelTec Sub-2000, which fires a 9mm cartridge (although .40 S&W is also available but not popular) from a 16" barrel.
I point this out because, while technically classified as a rifle, it's a handgun round fired from a longer, carbine-length barrel. IOW, it's about the weakest rifle of any type--let alone "assault"--that you can get your hands on without descending to rimfire rounds.
But we'll get to hear how the 9mm is a real "lung blower outer".
Just a couple of little factoids people who are analyzing the period of the "Babylonian exile" (when and where the Babylonian Talmud was written) should be sure to incorporate: only about 25% were ever deported to Babylon, and when "released from captivity", only 4% returned.
Stanford University maintains a collection of just such maps:
Glen McLaughlin Map Collection: California as an Island
Apparently they are not laughing it off as you see the many geniuses on social media do. Perhaps they should contact Stanford to discuss it with them.
I'm pretty sure this is just a smoke screen, in the form of a fake limited hangout, to obscure the FBI's all-too-real Gestapo assault on anything and anyone resisting the Establishment Agenda.
At least for me, the fact that it's published by The Intercept confirms it. But if anyone wants something more solid, here's what you're NOT going to get from this controversy: anyone going to prison, anyone paying a fine, anyone getting fired, anyone having to go with their manager to have a formal talk with the HR lady, etc, etc. That's because it's fake, and only enemies get punished for fake things.
Fauci was executed some time ago, and this documentary was released to maintain the impression he;s still alive in people's minds.
Before anyone points out that the video clip is from 2021 ad will not prove to anyone that Fauci is alive in 2023, strict rationality is not the way They "prove" anything. Few have ever noticed, but proof is not how They manipulate minds.
I would suggest the audio was faked. Fauci would have never said that aloud, never said it in range of a microphone, and never got the shot. Notice how they just show B-roll as he said it? Even less effort than a DeepFake.
The last time Vince Foster was seen alive was in the White House on his way to the Rose Garden where the new FBI Director.was to be announced. Turns out it was Louis Freeh!
Because Foster was Deputy White House Counsel and he "committed suicide" in Fort Marcy Park--which is Federal property--his death was investigated by the FBI. Guess who the Director was? Turns out it was Louis Freeh!
Whoops, really gave away the answer, didn't I?
As far as I can tell at the current time, it's both subject to external manipulation and genetic.
That is, in ancient times, kings and chief priests could be elevated to consciousness by some sort of treatment. This is what the "apple" in the Garden was, and also what we see represented in those Assyrian carvings where one of the "gods" is pointing a pinecone at the king's pineal gland.
I have not even a hint of evidence anyone is getting such treatments nowadays, so I presume that when the deal went down around 600 BC, some fraction of humans were genetically endowed with this characteristic. As these people began to be born, we see humans "waking up" all around the world during the Axial Age.
If we could recover the science and technology of those treatments, well that sure would help.