There was indeed a "War in Heaven". In a twist to what you might expect, a bargain was struck where the winners left and the losers stayed here. Two-thirds of the Anunnaki returned to Nibiru, and the Fallen Angels led by Satan were marooned.
A problem in unraveling all this was that Satan then proceeded to rewrite some of the history. Of course, various confusions and misunderstandings aided the cause of obfuscating real history. Much remains, though, and at least a skeletal picture can be reassembled.
It all takes a great degree of discernment and discipline, and wide-ranging research, but not many people are even interested. Most of those get tangled up in the barbed wire of existing "scholarship". The few that get past that nail their own feet to the floor with their biases and predispositions. You simply cannot tell someone anything different than what they already "know".
The current period we're in is some sort of test, but the Anunnaki will return. Quite possibly this will be within our lifetimes, the biggest clue being how panicked the Elites seem to be getting.
And finally, Genesis 1:1, when properly translated, mentions "the Father of the Beginnings" as the creator of the Elohim, but no more is known.
You've hit on quite an important point, and I've had exactly the same thought. As regards Yahweh of the Bible, what is virtually universally missed is that he radically alters his position just during the course of that document.
Yes, we start with all the "burnt offerings" and all the rest of this, but even the Ten Commandments says nothing of worship except "Remember the sabbath day". (Later, Jesus reminds us that the Sabbath was created for Man, not Man for the Sabbath.) Interestingly, there is a commandment to honor your father and mother but--again--Yahweh does not even include himself there.
By the time of Isaiah, we get this very strong plain and statement regarding worship from Yahweh (Isaiah 1:11-14):
To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the LORD: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats. When ye come to appear before me, who hath required this at your hand, to tread my courts? Bring no more vain oblations; incense is an abomination unto me; the new moons and sabbaths, the calling of assemblies, I cannot away with; it is iniquity, even the solemn meeting. Your new moons and your appointed feasts my soul hateth: they are a trouble unto me; I am weary to bear them.
Right in the Scripture, from the man himself, yet completely ignored! Finally, by the end of the Bible (although similar things are mentioned several times before), we find in Revelation 21:2-3:
And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.
"A bride adorned for her husband"? "Dwell with them"? "Their God"? It all gives quite a different picture than that of some sort of blind worship.
Again, all ignored, which has greatly informed my view of "Biblical scholarship".
My point was that if the people that go along with the people you're talking about did not go along with the people you're talking about, I doubt we'd have much of a problem at all.
How many people do you think would go along with Harari or Schwab just because they have such great ideas? I'd say it's a number that rounds down to zero. They go along because because they sense that good things will happen for them, just as with Bernard.
I remember once Mark Passio said that he thought there should be no prisons. He thought that all the inmates should be released back into their communities as a punishment for allowing them to become adults with such a low level of consciousness.
Now that's pretty extreme and I personally don't think we're ready for that at this point, but I was never able to put my finger on exactly why--in principle--he could be said to be wrong.
Turns out Satan's original name is Marduk, which if from the Sumerians and as far back as can (presently) be known. All the others, I would say, are best thought of a just sort of titles or "alternate descriptors".
So if you take "Hillary Rodham", an original name, you can probably think of two dozen different titles (like "Senator Clinton") or alternate descriptors (like "Hellary") for her, some very different than the original.
Even "Lucifer" itself is erroneous. If you trace it back to the original Hebrew source, you'll find it comes from the word "helel". Most properly translated and converted to a name, it would be something like "Shining One". I mention this not as trivia, but because it turns out to be key evidence in the case for his true identity.
They were afraid of him for whatever reason.
This fits into my thesis about the Elites, specifically that the vast majority of them aren't putting on the robes at the Eyes Wide Shut party and bowing down before flaming statues of Moloch. Rather, it all happens through influencing their behavior.
Take, for example, the "cool kids" back in school. Want good things to happen for you and to have a "good time"? Do what it takes to get in good with the cool kids. On the flip side, cross them and your life begins to become hellish.
Also, recognize that the cool kids had no membership lists or initiation ceremonies, but we all knew who they were and even how they ranked internally. The Elite are actually more explicit than that.
So yeah, the "smart" people knew that the smart move was to go along with the program when it came to JE. Is this best described as being "in on it"? I don't think it's very accurate and does not lead to a clear picture of the situation. And is there any conflict in which you've said to yourself, "I wish my picture of this situation was less clear"?
There is a two-fold problem in making this determination. (1) I think most Redditors are not capable of expression beyond the level of a bot, and (2) 95% of the content is simple glib one-liners.
So what the breakdown is between AI and low-consciousness humans is I couldn't even guess, but the far more alarming problem is the human one. Bots can be turned off, but consciousness (AFAIK) cannot easily be turned on.
You know, I've noticed this is going on even worse over on r/conspiracy. I mean, even worse than how worse it was before. My theory is that They have been reduced to the primitive technique of "the bad drives out the good".
To illustrate, imagine trying to drive a rival bar out of business. Instead of trying to complete, every day you just hand 40 bucks each to dirty, smelly, loud, aggressive people "experiencing homelessness" to go drink in there all day. Pretty soon, any real customers will get fed up and leave. The bar shuts down and the homeless go back to paying for their own drinks.
Did I just accidentally compare shills to dirty, smelly, loud, aggressive homeless people drinking all day on someone else's dime? Oh my word!
I regret there's really no way to sensibly reply to something so disorganized. Have you ever heard the phrase "not even wrong"?
Thanks for what I'm sure you consider a "contribution". Or maybe it's a "refutation". Who can say?
I would guess most of us here are fairly certain there has been an organized program of economic/environmental sabotage program active in the US for a while now.
What I would like to underscore is that when you consider the numerous systems and institutions and organizations we have for protecting us from harm, finding malefactors and bringing them to justice, and preventing future attacks, just realize that every bit of it means fuck all whenever "They" decide to flip the switch and deactivate it.
You know how there's that strain of conspiracy theorists/preppers that are faced with this murderous Satanic Fascist control system and talk about a "parallel economy" and "getting off the grid" and things of this nature?
What I have observed is that that's precisely what Russia, China, Iran, Turkiye, SA, et al, have been doing on a global scale over the last year, but none of those people I mentioned seemed to have ever noticed. Makes me wonder how deep their powers of analysis really were.
Anyway, my point is that both Russia and those CTists share the underlying goal that you do not have to give a single rip about anyone who opposes you (unless of course you care to).
That includes all the anti-Russia shills on this forum.
This is an important learning opportunity for understanding how humans really work.
Obviously, hordes of Leftists who watch MSNBC should see this and instantly realize, "Ohhhhhh, so that's what all the conservatives were complaining about all this time! Well, it all makes sense now. And what manipulative liars all these people are!" Yet can any of us find a single example of what should be millions?
So what's really happening? Well, the type of people that watch these outlets to "get informed" about the world are the type of people that take instructions from those they perceive as being "in authority". Regarding Twitter, they were instructed what to think then, and they are being instructed what to think now.
More specifically and importantly, it's instructions on how to feel, in this case outrage. Once they know how to feel, they can find reasoning or invent "facts" as necessary to support it. See the inversion?
To put a finer point on the particular dynamics in their mental processes, they have no ability to deviate from authority. It's not that they can't reason about situations such as this--they do it every single day. It's that they have been given the directive, so their reasoning process comes into play only to support that directive.
This is all subconscious. They lack even the ability to introspect and discover it for themselves, so good luck expecting them to. You might as well ask someone to let you know when they've fallen asleep.
Marcus Aurelius should be required reading in schools, but isn't for what I think we all know are obvious reasons. Really, I think one of the most surprising things is that just from reading his work, you'd never guess what his job was or even when he wrote it.
Well, I can't imagine the stress these people are under and how rapidly it would age them if allowed to proceed normally.
For example, take a look at Obama at the end of his presidency, then go back and look at him at the beginning. It's hard to believe he looked that young. I think it was Chappelle who joked that it looked like he slept in a turkey smoker.
Same thing with GWB. He was a strapping young go-getter when he was campaigning. Made all kinds of sense too, BTW, it's surreal to watch old campaign videos. And remember, both those guys were just placeholders standing around and reading from teleprompters, not under any real responsibility.
Now you have to compensate for the whole clone/body double/CGI thing, which throws off all calibration of "normal aging".
Some real kooks may be of the view that there is some sort of "Silent War" going on far behind the scenes, where one of the battlespaces is these tunnel networks. If so, well... let me back you up!
Army Is Spending Half a Billion to Train Soldiers to Fight Underground (6/24/2018)
they've all been phony
I've come to realize that only a handful are able to pick up on such things, probably because only a handful are looking, and probably because only a handful are able to crawl out of the mental trap where they feel secure seeing the lies that everyone else believes but never imagine that they themselves could be fooled.
I know this is probably not going to mean anything to anyone, but there are errors in what this AI (or whatever) is saying. The Bible is virtually universally misinterpreted on this subject, and those errors are repeated here.
Hey, I think that's a phony plane crash site! I learned for a fact from Flight 93 that a real crash looks like a Wile E. Coyote-style silhouette on the ground with some nonsense scattered about that looks like it came out the back of a dump truck.
I feel sorry for the people that fell for the obvious fakery.
Well, it's a real question that you pose. Why indeed? Few pose this question to themselves, and fewer still give any answer other than, "They're sheep!" That simply begs the question, does it not?
I suppose all this is a cordial invitation to everyone to raise their level of consciousness. Unless, of course, you're happy with the way it is.
I didn't track it, but around that time several of the Wikileaks principals "died suddenly". Also, Oct 2016 was when Pam Anderson visited Assange. He "got sick" and a number of people reported seeing him on live webcam dragged out of the embassy in the middle of the night.
I've followed JA's "appearances" since then and they've all been phony. He's either in some black site or--more likely--dead. That's why those RSA journalists couldn't get in to see him recently: no one to see.
Poland is now a full-on Fourth-generation Warfare state. I feel sorry for all the Poles that are going to suffer because of this.
If anyone is of the opinion that it was Zbigniew Brzezinski that lit the match igniting half a century of war that destroyed various nations of the Middle East, let me remind you that the US Ambassador to Poland since February 22, 2022 is his son, Mark Brzezinski.
February 22, 2022? Russia started the SMO two days later, didn't they? Maybe that was the final signal to them about where this was all headed, and they decided they could no longer postpone or avoid pulling the trigger.
When carefully examined and properly understood, this is key to understanding the original history and relationship between humans and the Anunnaki. It all revolves around a single Hebrew word: avod. You can examine it more closely later, but just take a look at the title of this article:
‘Avodah’: What It Means to Live a Seamless Life of Work, Worship, and Service
Does the disjunction scream out at you? If not,let me break it down.
In the "Abrahamic" religions, there is a strong division between work and worship. W.H. Auden mentions, "My working week and my Sunday rest," and every Christian knows what that means. The Biblical Jews wanted to put two of Jesus' followers to death for gathering firewood on the Sabbath. Many modern Jews won't press an elevator button on Sabbat.
But in "avodah", we see work and worship fused together. It's unexpected, contradictory, extraordinarily baffling! How can this be?
If we go back to the true origin, though, it makes perfect sense. We learn that humans were created to do work the Anunnaki did not want to do, beginning with mining gold but of course expanding to everything else. In other words, we were created to work for the Anunnaki, which becomes "to serve the gods", which becomes "worship of god(s)". But you see how the original meaning has been lost and disguised.
As far as where the "day of rest" concept came in, I don't personally know but I would think even beasts of burden are not worked every single day. I suspect that one day out of seven was established by the Anunnaki as appropriate rest for their bests of burden. Indeed, this may have been the very purpose of originating the concept of "week". Why would primitive farmers and hunters have the least care to create such a period of time?