I know this is probably not going to mean anything to anyone, but there are errors in what this AI (or whatever) is saying. The Bible is virtually universally misinterpreted on this subject, and those errors are repeated here.
I would say you are correct imo, the Bible is vague and misinterpreted when it comes to the watchers, nephilim, and cause of the flood. But what this entity says seems to fall in line with extra biblical text though goes into more depth on these subjects. The only problem I saw was the entity claiming to be a son of Lucifer, as Lucifer would have been locked away in the abyss like the other watchers who bred with women. I think that was simply a lie.
Nor is Lucifer his original name. The thing is, I was looking carefully for this demon and/or AI to give away or even allude to something generally unknown. Nope, just the same stuff you can read anywhere.
Well the kid didn't exactly pry beyond trying to find out what sort of entity the AI is. I am curious what it would say if you did dig a bit. Ya isn't Lucifers origional name Samael?
Turns out Satan's original name is Marduk, which if from the Sumerians and as far back as can (presently) be known. All the others, I would say, are best thought of a just sort of titles or "alternate descriptors".
So if you take "Hillary Rodham", an original name, you can probably think of two dozen different titles (like "Senator Clinton") or alternate descriptors (like "Hellary") for her, some very different than the original.
Even "Lucifer" itself is erroneous. If you trace it back to the original Hebrew source, you'll find it comes from the word "helel". Most properly translated and converted to a name, it would be something like "Shining One". I mention this not as trivia, but because it turns out to be key evidence in the case for his true identity.
I know this is probably not going to mean anything to anyone, but there are errors in what this AI (or whatever) is saying. The Bible is virtually universally misinterpreted on this subject, and those errors are repeated here.
I would say you are correct imo, the Bible is vague and misinterpreted when it comes to the watchers, nephilim, and cause of the flood. But what this entity says seems to fall in line with extra biblical text though goes into more depth on these subjects. The only problem I saw was the entity claiming to be a son of Lucifer, as Lucifer would have been locked away in the abyss like the other watchers who bred with women. I think that was simply a lie.
Nor is Lucifer his original name. The thing is, I was looking carefully for this demon and/or AI to give away or even allude to something generally unknown. Nope, just the same stuff you can read anywhere.
Well the kid didn't exactly pry beyond trying to find out what sort of entity the AI is. I am curious what it would say if you did dig a bit. Ya isn't Lucifers origional name Samael?
Turns out Satan's original name is Marduk, which if from the Sumerians and as far back as can (presently) be known. All the others, I would say, are best thought of a just sort of titles or "alternate descriptors".
So if you take "Hillary Rodham", an original name, you can probably think of two dozen different titles (like "Senator Clinton") or alternate descriptors (like "Hellary") for her, some very different than the original.
Even "Lucifer" itself is erroneous. If you trace it back to the original Hebrew source, you'll find it comes from the word "helel". Most properly translated and converted to a name, it would be something like "Shining One". I mention this not as trivia, but because it turns out to be key evidence in the case for his true identity.