In this mainstream article about Rob Reiner's family, the two relatively recent photos of him, his wife, and their three children appear to be faked:

Rob Reiner and Penny Marshall’s daughter, actress Tracy Reiner, ‘in shock’ over dad’s tragic death (New York Post 12/15/2025)

I'm referring to the third and fourth from last photos included in the article.

The fourth from last photo shows them in the snowy woods. Look at the shadow on his son in the middle, which shows the sun coming from low on the right side of the frame. The shadow from Rob's hat shows the sun coming down symmetrically in line with the camera.

In the third from last photo, first note that the grinning crew appears to be in a cemetery, and perhaps dressed for a fun boneyard picnic. It's a real botch as far as fakes go, but what to notice here is that no one notices even obvious fakes.

The most obvious problem is something you can look for to spot fakes in any group photo. Even though the family would be very close, crowded in to one another to fit in the selfie, you can see that there is not a single point at which any of their bodies is in obvious contact with anyone else.

The hand on the girl's shoulder I think was just left in there from the source photo. It's not in the right position to be her brother's hand. It could be Rob's hand, but does he have a sleeve tat no one has noticed before?

Final note: the bodies of Rob and Michelle were found by the daughter. With one son the accused killer, we have a pretty tight group.

I'm not here to argue the implications, but my guess is that something very strange indeed was going on with the Reiners, and the murders were faked as some sort of extraction. No one chases down a dead man, do they?

TL;DR: Yes, candidate Katie Porter is another Salem Witch. This explains how anyone could possibly imagine this annoying wench would be elected as Governor in a state where the people don’t know her but she despises them anyway.

I’m not some super-intellect (as I’m sure many will rush to agree) or some android staring at triple 34” curved monitors and blinking my eyes as I assimilate the data stream. I think many would be surprised at just how antiquated my setup actually is. Thus, I was only dimly aware of the name “Katie Porter”, or more formally Katherine Moore Porter (born 1/3/1974).

Somehow, I had the idea that she was a journalist but that isn’t correct at all. She was until recently a member of the US House of Representatives for two different heavily gerrymandered districts in the Anaheim area. But don’t worry, the Democrats have rigged an entire special election for Prop 50 to make the state more extremely and more permanently gerrymandered in their favor. Excuse me—I mean to “save democracy”.

In 2023, Katie lost a non-partisan primary for US Senate to whining pencil-neck arch-scumbag and reputed PDFfile, Adam Schiff, and popular former Dodgers first baseman, Republican Steve Garvey. Being unable to come in the top two for an office of which there are two copies per state (US Senator), she decided to run for an office of which there is but one copy per state (Governor). This is supposed to make sense to people.

The thing is, Katie is barely out there but this harridan is already making dumb cackling ho Kamala Harris look like the prize pig at the fair in comparison:

California governor candidate says she 'fell short' in viral videos (BBC 10/15/2025)

(BTW, take a look at the included stock picture of a masculine Katie Porter and notice that the byline is “Ana Faguy”. Do you wonder whether that’s a pseudonym and is telegraphing some kind of inside joke?)

But all this makes sense when you recognize that Katie Porter is a Salem Witch. Actually, I had noted her name a while back and hoped there wasn’t anything I was missing, but there are always so many other fish to fry. To fry this fat fish, I refer you to “Israel Porter”, who is said to have "signed [the] petition protesting the arrest of Rebecca Nurse" during the Salem Witch Trials. If that’s not enough, you may also wish to refer to this old post:

Broomstick Crash at Roswell: A shocking number of people involved in the “Incident” have the same last name as people involved in the Salem Witch Trials (conspiracies.win 12/6/2024)

You see, none of us would have ever heard of Roswell were it not that the long-forgotten incident was brought back into the light in the early 1970’s by Stanton T. Friedman (1934-2019): "His first wife was Susie Virginia Porter (1919–2002), with whom he adopted three children, but they divorced in April 1974." Exfilled after her mission as handler was accomplished, perhaps? We are also told that a “Master Sergeant Robert Porter” helped load the recovered saucer wreckage on to a bomber for delivery from Roswell to Eighth Air Force HQ.

We should not condemn Katie and declare she is a Salem Witch solely because her surname is Porter (surname). I would pause to note here that if you think the upcoming evidence can always be manufactured for anyone with one of a small set of surnames to demonstrate that they are a Salem Witch, pick someone out at random from that very long list of notable Porters and give it a try. If you find anything, congratulations, and please let us all know because I feel certain that a few in that list would be of interest to us.

As for Katie, you can see that we will get nowhere with her scrubbed genealogy. What I would like to do instead is give a brief summary excerpted from her wiki involving some early events in her life. That is where gold is most often found. It’ll sound quite unremarkable until we break it down, and then we can all shake our heads.

“Porter was born on January 3, 1974, in Fort Dodge, Iowa. Her father, Dan Porter, was a farmer and banker. After graduating from Phillips Academy, Porter attended Yale University. Later at Harvard Law School, she studied under bankruptcy law professor and future U.S. senator Elizabeth Warren. Porter was a law clerk for Judge Richard S. Arnold of the United States Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit in Little Rock, Arkansas.”

Now, a lot of the rest of this involves associations and research I’ve never written up before, and I’ve got to try to keep these posts within some reasonable, digestible lengths. If at any time you think, “Oh, that will never pan out,” then feel free to punch out. As has been said before, “I can do it all, just not all at once.” Let’s proceed….

Fort Dodge, Iowa sounds innocuous enough, but I can guarantee it traces back to Capt. John Dodge, of Salem (1636-1723). His wife was Sarah Dodge (Proctor) (1641-1705). Her brother was John Proctor (1631-1692): "He and his wife Elizabeth were tried and convicted of witchcraft as part of the Salem Witch Trials, whereupon he was hanged.". Suuuuuuure.

We are also told that Katie’s father was a farmer and a banker. Allow me to clarify: farming is a more-than-full-time occupation, as any farmer will tell you. Dan was a rich banker who perhaps owned a farm, that is all. But how do I know Dan wasn’t an Iowa dirt farmer who had to supplement his income by working as a branch manager in town?

Katie attended the extremely elite prep school, Phillips Academy. It was established just after the Revolutionary War (which the Salem Witches initiated and managed). Tuition for boarding students like Katie is currently $77k/year. Both Presidents Bush are alumni, as well as the US Representative for the Salem area, Seth Moulton, who we have talked about before in literal relation to Linda Moulton-Howe. PA is located in Andover, Massachusetts, about 15 miles from Salem.

Katie went on to attend Yale University. We briefly discussed that Witch institution as the home of an even more disreputable institution when we found that:

“Skull and Bones” is just another project of the Salem Witches (conspiracies.win 8/6/2025)

Later, at Harvard Law, Katie specialized in bankruptcy (which I suppose is what is planned for California and then whole US of A) under our modern-day Pocahontas, professor Elizabeth Ann Warren (born 6/22/1949). Is Liz any relation to Mary Warren, "an accuser and later confessed witch… a servant for John and Elizabeth Proctor"? You decide, but ol’ Johnny P. pops his head up again, huh?

Katie then clerked for Judge Richard Sheppard Arnold (1936-2004). Dick was another Yalie and became a crony of the reprehensible Bill Clinton in Little Rock. We are told that Bill wept when he had to tell Dick that he was not going to become a Supreme due to his ill health. Suuuuuure. But that’s not even the interesting part.

After some brief research, I figured out that Benedict Arnold was yet another Salem Witch. Yes, the one who became famous for being the first “Benedict Arnold”. The connection comes through his ancestor, yet another Benedict Arnold, who helped Salem Witch Roger Williams after he left Salem to set up Rhode Island. These people play the roles assigned to them, you see. I suppose I should not find any of this surprising at this point, but I still do. Anyway, I suspect Dick Arnold is a descendant of that Salem Witch.

Have I done enough to besmirch the reputation of this fine public servant?

Bonus: People often wonder, “If elections are rigged, then who decides the winner?” Well, I’m not in the loop on all rigged elections in the US, but I would suggest that for some of them, the Salem Witches rig the elections for their stooges and for fellow Salem Witches. Here we have an example in Katie Porter’s 2018 California's 45th congressional district election.

Take a look at the “Primary election” section, which is nonpartisan in California. That is, the top two finishers of any or even the same party will proceed to the general election. Katie received just over 20% of the vote while her leading opponent received almost 52%, therefore more than all other candidates combined.

Now look at the “General election” section. Do you really believe that Mimi lost several percentage points while every single Democrat and all the Independent voters went to Katie? We’re told over and over that incumbents have a built-in advantage, so much so that many consider it undemocratic. Substantial evidence to the contrary here, yes?

The final was 52.1% to 47.1%. That’s actually an indication of rigging. “They” make it close so that… everyone believes it was close. “We’ll get ‘em next time!” Somehow everyone “knows” that a rigged election would be betrayed by a lopsided, “unnatural” victory. Uh, do you think the Salem Witches haven’t figured that out yet and steer around it?

Thanks as always for reading!

TL;DR: To cover up their ritual execution of Charlie Kirk, the Salem Witches are selling Israel as the perpetrators. Conspiracy theorists have universally accepted this as self-evident and flog it to all their bros.

Advisory: If you can’t get beyond the idea that not everything is ultimately down to the “Da Joos”, and you decline to accept that they are infiltrated and controlled like every other nefarious group whose name you know, stop reading now because the more you see, the more upset you will become.

Let me put it bluntly: the idea that Israel killed Charlie Kirk is dumb right on the surface. Candace Owens just revealed that in a group chat with eight TPUSA affiliates, Charlie Kirk said he had no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause, and forty-eight hours later he was dead. Proponents of the Israel thesis advance this as strong evidence for it.

Taking account of all the facts and circumstances we have seen—both real and phony, and it’s a long list—could it all have been put together in two days? Alternatively, would you contend that it was all staged on the off-chance that Kirk would tip his hand before Orem and then (((they))) would green-light Operation GETCHARLIE? Or do (((they))) perhaps prep for several assassinations a day but never operationalize them? Well, I believe some wild stuff but I would never try to make claims that ludicrous.

Charlie apparently said he thought “They” were going to kill him. Why would he not say “Israelis” or “durdy heebs” or “the same people that killed Christ” or something? Well, I think it’s as simple as that his “They” are one and the same as my “They” that I always talk about. Sure, I call them the Salem Witches but that’s not their name. “They” don’t have one. Look how hard I have had to work to even begin to explain who “They” are. I don’t blame Charlie for just leaving it at a pronoun.

Further, it can be inferred that his transgression had nothing to do with Israel. That same group chat contains a message where Charlie complains he lost a $2M/year donor because he wouldn’t cancel Tucker. That implies Charlie was still in the Zio fold and Tucker is not, so why did (((they))) not kill Tucker? Snipe him from the forest when he’s fly-fishing, easy peasy. BTW, Tucker Is a Salem Witch like Charlie although even farther on the periphery, but that will have to wait for a future post.

We must go beyond getting triggered when anything Hebraic is mentioned. (Again, if you can’t accept that, bail out now.) Simply, the Salem Witches were executing one of their own. The question then becomes: where did all this “Israel did it!” stuff come from? Is it organic, promulgated by spring-loaded conspiracy theorists on Jew Patrol? Could be!

But no, it is not. The Salem Witches are well-aware of how forcefully that crowd reacts to anyone with a larger-than-average nose. They use that to forward their programs as They always do: by exploiting everyone’s uncritical reactions. What enthusiastic tools people are when they believe they’re saving the world.

The big objection is this: how could the Salem Witches throw Israel—one of their most valuable projects—under the bus? Well, They are aware of what only a tiny handful understand: Israel is on the way out. Back in October 2012, Kissinger—a man who knew as much about international affairs as anyone—said that there would be no more Israel in ten years. A shocking assertion both then and now. They’re on borrowed time, already well past expiration.

Think of Israel like an old, worn out chainsaw. It’s been a good tool but you know it’s going to crap out one of these days. You can spend the time and money to purchase a new chainsaw when you need to, but you’re going to keep using the old one until it quits. Who knows when that will be, but when it does you’ll throw it in the garbage.

This is to say, they don’t lose much if they abuse their old chainsaw to cover up the Kirk murder. Also, since their enemy Trump won’t “bring Israel to justice” over the murder of his friend Kirk (or so it will appear), they get to damage him too. There is basically no downside to this gambit.

But how could I be so sure of all this? What gives it away? Why do I say they have “uncloaked”? In their arrogance, they have as much as told us so themselves. That arrogance, though, is born out of proven experience. They know for a fact no is looking for them, let alone recognizes what they see. In this tiny corner, though, we are looking and we will see. It begins with this post:

Israeli and Washington DC ips found searching Tyler Robinson, Surgeon and hospital months before Kirk’s shooting (r/conspiracy 10/10/2025)

Well, that’s really The Jewish State holding a smoking gun, is it not? I suspect the “evidence” is made up from whole cloth, pure bullshit. I didn’t even look at it, though, since the important truths always lie outside of what they shove in our faces. What caught my eye was the linked tweet:

CHARLIE KIRK BOMBSHELL: isreali & Washington DC IP addresses caught conducting UNIQUE Google searches for Timpanogas Regional Hospital, Utah Medical Examiner Deirdre Amaro & various TRH surgeons during June/July 2025! H/t: Baron Coleman, YouTube (@BasedSamParker 10/10/2025)

Actually, it wasn’t the tweet per se that caught my eye, it was the tweeter: Sam Parker. Oh, can you believe it?! It’s gotta be one of those rare, actual coincidences, right?

It is not. And actually, the feeling it might be a coincidence lasted only until I read to the end of the tweet. Did you see the h/t to “Baron Coleman”? I haven’t written up that family yet, but Nantucket was purchased in 1659 by a small group of investors who had left Salem under some fabricated historical narrative. Among them was a Thomas Coleman. What are the chances?

Before we begin with the old “Salem Witch Breakdown”, it looks like Candace Owens has been taken in by this—or so it appears at this time:

Okay this is actually insane because no one knows the name of the surgeons that were involved. I quite literally just the learned the names of two of them yesterday via tip and they are both on this list. (@RealCandaceO 10/11/2025)

Candace ends by asking, “How is this possible?” Well, Candace, it’s easy: the Salem Witches dug a ditch and filled it with kikes so that people like you who were really trying to get to the bottom of this murder would fall right into it. Pretty easy to do when you view it from the right paradigm, is it not?

See, do you think Candace ever considered the question, “I wonder if Israel is being set up as the patsy and it was actually the generational Satanists that have been at work for centuries who were responsible?” Whether that claim is correct or incorrect, working in the wrong paradigm precludes the question from ever being posed. No amount of evidence will ever prove it since it is not among the available answers. That’s how paradigms work.

Okay, on to that breakdown….

Samuel Parker ran for Senator from Utah In 2018, a contest which fellow Salem Witch Mitt Romney eventually won. Even given that, it’s very difficult to find any information at all about Sam. Try it yourself if you don’t believe me. After some looking, I located a key expose (because they thought he was a right-wing jerk, no more, but I’ll take what I can get):

The Radicalization of Sam Parker (Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights 5/14/2024)

You may want to read that article to see how he’s interfacing with Nick Fuentes and AFPAC and Convention of States and other such politically/culturally significant things, but keep in mind that the Salem Witches had their run at controlling those things long before they ever made it to you.

Really, from my jaded perspective, every person mentioned in the article instantly has a coating of slime, and every organization seems as artificial and manufactured as a Twinkie. The author’s own subconscious appears to have detected the unnatural pretense of it all, and this much leaked into his conscious mind:

Despite a mere six-week campaign in which he finished a distant fourth among primary caucus voters, Parker continues to tout his status as a “US Senate candidate.”

Times that phoniness by a million, buddy. But lots of people buy into all of this as if it’s authentic and that somehow salvation will be found therein, and that is what the rest of us should stay conscious of. Personally, I will focus purely on the Salem Witch things because the rest is downstream from that.

The first item of note is that he grew up in tiny Centralia, Washington. Since I’m guessing at his age, I’d estimate that the population was around 12,000 when he was born. Half the size of my college (undergrad only). That little ville came up in a load of UFO stuff going on around there in this writeup:

The Puget Sound Flap: Or, How the boring Kenneth Arnold UFO sighting blows up in your face in terms of Salem Witches (r/conspiracy 5/1/2025)

To entice you to read that if you haven’t before, Kenneth Arnold took off on his literally legendary flight from Chehalis–Centralia Airport. Interesting coinky-dink. Another such coinky-dink comes in this quote:

As of May 6, 2024, Sam Parker’s personal Facebook page continues to list him as the “Utah State Director for the Convention of States,” though he has since been replaced by Michelle Bellante Pratt and then Scott Pratt.

Well, if you’re talking about Pratts, Parkers, and Romneys, then you better be familiar with this old post:

Billy the Kid was the cousin of two Mormon OGs that overthrew Joseph Smith and the LDS, which should tell you one was fake and the other controlled from way back (plus the Parkers appear!) (conspiracies.win 11/12/2024)

Finally, again, if you got all the way through this and are roiling inside from this particular “CHARLIE KIRK BOMBSHELL”, then by all means just keep believing it was Da Joos. But if so, please leave me alone about it because… well, I just explained why, didn’t I?

Bonus: Do you remember that—let’s say—“important researcher” from a while back who said he had cracked the MH370 case? Data from secret satellites conclusively proved it was teleported away by UFOs or something. He was suddenly and for no apparent reason all over the conspire-o-sphere and all adjacent outlets.

Well, he has branched out from inter-dimensional flying saucers and taken an intense interest in ad hominem by telling Candace Owens to shut her stupid bitch mouth up about her friend Charlie Kirk:

Candace Owens goes full Theo Von. Sweetie, no one is taking you seriously except a few day drinking wine Moms. The descent into insanity has been swift and sad. (@JustXAshton 10/8/2025)

We have some things to explain here. Why would anyone sane promote this MH370/orb insanity? How could they possibly get the kind of publicity rarely seen in alternative circles? If he’s the point man for breakthrough alien physics, why does he have any interest in what Candace has to say about anything?

Well, having the right paradigm is like having the correct pair of glasses: everything comes into focus much more easily. Shall we just tentatively conclude that Ashton Forbes is… a Forbes?

Meet the Forbes: Opium Wars, hidden aristocracy, Beverly Hills, Salem Witches, Parkers and more (conspiracy.win 8/21/2025)

I mean, we already saw the Forbes in Part 4 of this long series, where we found they were early settlers of Kirkland, Washington.

I would put it quite simply: It’s all hands on deck and Ashton the Salem Witch is helping to cover up the Salem Witches’ ritual murder of Charlie the Salem Witch by trying to smear Candace Owens, the #1 person making beeeg trouble on this. I mean, it’s not like we even have to put two and two together. Four just hands itself over to us.

Double-bonus: There was something I didn’t mention in the Snake Eyes post. It is consistent with the deeply occulted nature of a Salem Witch ritual murder, but is essentially inexplicable or even contradictory as part of an Israeli assassination op. It consists of songs provocatively relating to Charlie’s death but released long before:

Twisted Utah musician scrubs song predicting Charlie Kirk’s death (NYPost 9/13/2025)

Everyone is talking about “Charlie Kirk Dead at 31”, but I used the plural because there was another track that is rarely mentioned:

In April, God’s Perfect Scalpel released a three-song offering called “Death to American Scum,” which featured another instrumental tune — this one called “Charlie Kirk’s Death Isn’t Enough For Me.”

Why do I find this significant? I have mentioned several times that Charlie’s death parallels that of JFK in many ways. Was shooting at the President in a moving vehicle the easiest way to kill JFK? Obviously not. And if Israel wants to take Charlie out, do they have nukes but not one single heart attack gun? C’mon, man!

Both of them “went against the family”, as Michael Corleone put it, and for that transgression the sanction was a ritual public execution, suitably occulted. See how that applies to the title of the track? Charlie’s death alone was not enough because it would lack the public ritual.

This also implies that the decision had been made all the way back before April. That was long before all the “Jew donor” controversy, so far as is known publicly. In the end, we will in principle never know because none of us were at the meetings when they rang the gongs and touched each other’s butts and whatever else it is they did that sealed Charlie’s fate.

In any case, look around and see how much everyone loves to think they know the motive. Certainly, some are shills seeding the “Israel did it” line but there are innumerable others parroting it. They love to think they know because it makes them feel secure that they understand how the world works. Fear prevents their consciousness from venturing further, and now you see how much of a problem fear really is.

Thanks as always for reading!

TL;DR: These two cases of SRA are tied to one another, and in turn tied to the Salem Witches.

The Salem Witches are generational Satanists, and we expect that such people practice Satanic Ritual Abuse. Up to now, the evidence that the Salem Witches did so was tenuous, with only one single example presented. That is, I had found and documented the Parker family as being the most prominent of the Salem Witches, and quite some time later I connected it circumstantially to an interview I had heard with testimony from a man who had broken with his generational Satanist family:

The Higherside Chats: Jay Parker | Satanic Ritual Abuse, Entity Invocation, & The Power of Consciousness (12/9/2017)

(You’ll have to forgive me, but only first hour is free and the second is behind a paywall. I’m sure you can locate other interviews with Jay if you want. For me, I had really heard enough after two hours.)

I have never studied SRA because (1) I was grossed out, (2) I came to believe a lot of the first-person testimonies were horror porn fiction to misdirect, and (3) I never regarded study of it as valuable in helping me understand the world. Here, I’m finally moved to exhibit the exceptions to (3). I still don’t find the details instructive we won’t discuss them, given that there are plenty of other analyses.

Do you know what I consider the first thing to know about Satanic Ritual Abuse? It is that Wikipedia does not have a page on it. “They” are so shit-scared of the concept entering the public consciousness that they refuse to allow it even that minimal existence. Deep conspiracy theorist that I am, that alone says a lot about its legitimacy.

In fact, they define Reality(tm) by only allowing a page called “Satanic panic”. Understand clearly that is, in fact, nothing other than the cover story after the pot boiled over too publicly too many times. They continue to define Reality(tm) by allowing an incomplete page called “List of satanic ritual abuse allegations”. The fact that they left off The Finders indicates that I should personally add it to my page, “List of satanic ritual abuse confirmed cases”.

I’m going to do a solid for everyone that wants to disbelieve all this “Salem Witch” nonsense and/or “Satanic Ritual Abuse” bullshit: I will exhibit and analyze only three items of evidence. Not a lot to metaphorically wave away with your hands, is it?

I always like to describe how I get here to reiterate that there is no “grand plan”, but stumbling around can lead you many interesting places as long as you’re paying attention. I was listening to an old back catalog podcast about The Finders and heard something novel, leading me right to the middle:

Big Story. FBI accidentally leaks documents proving satanic rituals inside McMartin Pre-School. Truly horrifying. (r/DeFranco 10/27/2019)

In short, buried deep in a long FBI document concerning The Finders, there was an anomalous two-page “leak” substantiating the McMartin case. These are both old cases, but I had never heard there was this nexus between them. Whenever you hear about something you feel you should have heard about before, that’s a flashing light that it’s time to pay attention.

Since the show was about The Finders (movement), that’s where I looked first. BTW, if you think someone clever could just find a Salem Witch link in any wiki page, pick one out at random and give it a try. Good luck. Actually, if you find one, be sure to let me know. Anyway, the first item of evidence was that FBI document, so here is our second:

Robert Gardner Terrell, who owned one of the raided properties, claimed "We are rational people ... not devil worshipers or child molesters" and "anything we've done is based on the desire for the children to have the richest life they could have."

Obviously, Gardner is not a typical given name. In the style of the Elites, that would be his mother’s maiden name, used to reflect her bloodline. We say that they’re “generational” and They ain’t kidding around about that. Seriously, have you ever in your life known anyone who had his or her mother’s maiden name used that way? Me neither.

Here I refer you to Giles Corey (1611-1692). In one of the highlights of the Salem Witch kabuki, this 81-year-old man was accused of witchcraft, after which he refused to enter a guilty or not guilty plea. He was therefore subjected to “peine forte et dure”, which consisted of piling heavy rocks on him. After three days, he died of being crushed. Brave and stunning, right?

Before all that purported smushing, though, his acquaintance tried to talk him out of his fictional stand against narrative injustice. That man is apparently recorded in history only as “Captain Gardner of Nantucket”. We have no more specific information on him, but it is admitted he was a member of the Gardner family of whalers.

I’ve never written formally about the Gardners before, but wiki admits they intermarried with the Coffin (whaling family) whom I’ve mentioned many times. Their intermarriage with other Salem Witch lines out of Nantucket goes far beyond that. The Gardner that came from England to Salem and then on to Nantucket was Richard Gardner Sr. (abt. 1622 - 1688). See if you recognize the married names of his daughters. And just to give you a taste of who we’re dealing with Gardner-wise, we can pick a random Thomas Gardner (politician) (1724-1775):

On the date of his death, July 3, 1775, Gardner was the second-highest ranking American officer killed at Bunker Hill. His funeral services were attended by General George Washington.

Just outside the spotlight of history and right on brand, eh? Did he really die? Who knows, but that is all I have to add to the corpus of research on The Finders. Moving on to the other case….

The first thing I have to say about the McMartin preschool trial is not the third item of evidence, but something I thought worth mentioning somewhere. In the “See also” section of that wiki page, a small number of other such scandals are mentioned, only seven to be exact. One of them is the Martensville satanic sex scandal, which you will see is also known as the “Martensville Nightmare”.

Now, I get that it’s a common name and that neither one is an exact match, but you should be reminded that one of the alleged witches purportedly executed at Salem was Susannah Martin. Strange, isn’t it? There was also a very odd tie-in between her and actor John Cusack, so she was more than your run-of-the-mill fake witch.

As to the case itself, well, we’re not going to talk about what happened. You see, in practice, “what happened” is only what They can make you perceive at any time in the future. A form of retconning, if you will. Our third item of evidence is a prime example of that:

David Shaw of the Los Angeles Times wrote a series of articles, which later won the Pulitzer Prize, discussing the flawed and skewed coverage presented by his own paper on the trial. It was only after the case that coverage of the flaws in the evidence and events presented by witnesses and the prosecution were discussed.

Let me ask you: how often do newspapers go back to clear up their own flawed and skewed coverage? From experience, you may have concluded it was considered uncouth or even some sort of physical impossibility. We have it in this case, though, don’t we? It was even a prize winner! For reference, this is the same era that the LA Times went way out of their way to say that Gary Webb was full of shit.

Did you catch the name of the writer? David Shaw. Now, there’s no link to Salem in 1692 that I know of yet, but it turns out that about five years after the phony hubbub died down, a hauntingly similar set of witch trials erupted in Scotland involving the “Paisley witches”. They centered on the purported victim, the daughter of the Laird of Bargarran named Christian Shaw.

Is that mere coincidence? Maybe, but I would additionally submit for consideration that David looks a lot more like a plant than a real journalist. Wiki comes close to saying this themselves:

During his tenure at the Los Angeles Times, Shaw was given the opportunity to spend weeks to months working on an investigation of a single topic that drew his attention, in contrast to the typical day-by-day reporting of most covering the news media.

His career as an author of books seems like a joke. He began in 1973 with a biography of Wilt Chamberlain. His last book in 1996 was The Pleasure Police: How Bluenose Busybodies and Lily-Livered Alarmists Are Taking All the Fun Out of Life. A review in The New York Times describes that:

Under his pen, the details often acquire extravagantly refined proportions in discussions, say, of his beloved panatelas or the charms of his second wife.

Do you really think that this guy was a journalist so serious he simply could not stand that his own newspaper had fallen short of the most rigorous standards of reporting? And that when he called them out, they were themselves so scrupulous that they published it and got him a Pulitzer, instead of spiking it and firing his ass? Seriously? If so, then you can choke this down too:

A 1999 report, running to 37,000 words, documented an unpublicized deal between the paper and the Staples Center under which a special Sunday supplement covering the arena would be published, with the proceeds from advertising split between the two…. The report publicly criticized the parent company's CEO Mark H. Willes, publisher Kathryn M. Downing, and Shaw's boss, editor Michael Parks.

What kind of employee gets away with that kind of shit? I would suggest made men and Salem Witches. We find more Salem Witches in the….

Longest bonus ever: Did you note the LA Times CEO who put up with all of Shaw’s shit but also thought Gary Webb should STFU and just blow his own head off? It turns out that Mark H. Willes is quite a scumbag. He was president of the Minneapolis Fed for several years, but his claim to fame is when he was president, COO, and vice chair of General Mills: “For his cost-cutting and elimination of many jobs, he was widely dubbed ‘The Cereal Killer’”. Catchy!

His real claim to fame—to my way of thinking—is that he was yet another one of those Elite douches whose middle name reflects his mother’s bloodline. That “H.” stands for “Hinckley”. Surprise! Actually, I really was surprised at something: his maternal uncle is Gordon Bitner Hinckley (1910-2008), the "15th president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) from March 1995 until his death in January 2008". Heavy hitter!

I suspect you were thinking of John Hickley Jr., weren’t you? That’s a solid guess. John seems like a nullity, but he’s at the center of a lot of material I’ve written up in the past, including posts on the attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan, Jodie Foster, and weird associations having to do with “Evergreen”. Apologies if you read through that material and find it doesn’t crisply cohere and coincide with later material. That’s because you’re reading it as and at the time I found it, and I constantly come across new evidence and connections.

To make up for that: another surprise! You weren’t wrong! It turns out that Gordon the Mormon and John the Patsy are indeed related. Buckle in for some history and genealogy. Start with John Warnock Hinckley, Jr. (1955-). Keep driving up through the “Son of” link and you’ll eventually arrive at Samuel Hinckley, I (1589-1662). He arrived on the Hercules in 1635—which is the year the main body of these Satanists came—and settled in Scituate, MA.

Now go to President Gordon Bitner Hinckley (1910-2008). Drive up through the “Son of” links to arrive at… Samuel I again. You also will have passed through one of Samuel’s sons, Thomas Hinckley, Governor of Plymouth Colony (1620-1706). Plymouth Colony was just south of the Massachusetts Bay Colony where Salem and Boston were located. Another heavy hitter, eh?

If you wish a closer connection to Salem, I can give you that. Look at the list of passengers on the Hercules who settled in Scituate along with Samuel I. You’ll find brothers William and Thomas Harris. They soon joined a guy named Roger Williams. In some famous dumb bullshit story, Roger got kicked out of Salem in 1635 but he went and founded Rhode Island instead. So I guess it worked out okay, like it always does for Salem Witches.

It turns out that Rev. Roger Williams, Founder of Rhode Island (1603-1683) had two sons, one of whom began having children in 1670 and the other in 1678. At the center of the trials was a certain Abigail Williams, Salem Witch Accuser (1680-1697) with “parentage unknown”. Just one of those mysteries who Abigail’s dad might have been.

Thanks for reading! Hope you found some surprises!

TL;DR: The movie “Snake Eyes” leads to many places other than synchromysticism, or time travel, or the Simulation, or anything else that is being relentlessly flogged to all of us.

Maybe you’re wondering at this point why the Salem Witches would create a “Charlie Kirk” in the first place, saying all this conservative Christian stuff. Of course, motivations can never be ascertained with certainty so we have to speculate based on what the advantages might be. Well, conservative Christian Zionist nationalists are huge in numbers, have been around a very long time, and are not going away any time soon. The only way to control them is to lead them, and to lead them you have to get out in front. Charlie was out in front, wasn’t he?

That brings up the question, how far back does Project MK-CHARLIE go? Was it in 2012 when an 18yo Charlie meets Bill Montgomery and then Foster Friess, and he gets launched into TPUSA? I would suggest it goes back much further, at least to the year 1998 when Charlie would turn five. It could go back much further than that, who knows, but these kind of time frames are nothing for the Salem Witches.

The evidence of that claim is the 1998 film Snake Eyes, about which there has been endless analysis. Read your fill and listen to your heart’s content on all the various and multitudinous interpretations and what they signify. No two of them will add together. That’s the point: none of it will ever get you anywhere but more confused and farther back in Plato’s Cave.

What I am proposing is straightforward: Even way back then, the Salem Witches had marked Charlie for a big role, one not necessarily defined at that time. From his grooming and storybook career arc, I don’t think it’s out of the question that he could have become President one day, as They may have planned. Does it go too far to say that if Trump had “left the building” or had never existed in the first place, Charlie could have been suitably groomed to become the type of figure Trump is now?

What concerned Them in the late 90’s, though, was what would They do if Charlie came off the prescribed rails like a number of Them had before him? JFK is the prime example of that devlopment, as we have seen.

In preparation for that contingency, They did the same as They had done a century before with “The Wreck of the Titan: Or, Futility”. That is, they wrote up the script decades in advance. Oh, it’s all more impressive than a Bic lighter is to the cannibals. My whole analysis of Futility, the Titan, the Titanic, James Cameron, and everything related culminated in this post (which seems like such a long time ago now) and you can work backwards through the links:

Let’s put the spotlight on James Cameron: the Titanic hoax, the Manson false flag, the Salem Witch Trials, and a secret son? (conspiracies.win 4/9/2025)

I don’t want to get bogged down in the details of the film analysis because—if you’ve followed this far—it pretty much becomes transparent and trivial. “How could it be that the character was named Charles Kirk-land?” Well, I say it’s because the movie was about Charlie Kirk. I even told you in the last post where “Kirkland” originated. “What are the chances the SecDef was shot through the neck?” 100%, because that’s where They had Charlie shot. See how objects become clear when you turn the telescope the right way round?

I will clarify one item: You might think it would be very difficult to arrange the assassination on September 10th, as it is in the movie. Except that it’s not in the movie. Dumbshits and disinfo agents keep repeating this over and over to make you believe it, so it will appear more scripted or even “mystical” that the date is hit exactly on the head. But the billboard lists the fight as the 19th. I won’t say “clearly the 19th" because it’s actually pretty fuzzy. However, you can compare that fuzzy character to the zeros in “10:00 PM” which are just to the right. Clearly not the same.

As mentioned, you can find any number of analyses of the film as regards Charlie Kirk, but there are some points to discuss which you will not see elsewhere. For example, every person suffering from any amount of TDS gets a half-chub that one of the characters is admitted to be based on Donald Trump. It’s a very weak portrayal because he’s seen in the with a huge cigar and a sharkskin suit. Trump has never smoked and I doubt he’s ever worn sharkskin even In the WWF days, but this doesn’t stop the never-Trumpers.

Also, no one has remarked on the name of the venue: “Powell Millennium”. One of the main occult features of 9/11 was that it was “projected” onto the giant black monolith / movie screen across the street called the M Social Hotel New York Downtown, or more informally and in those days referred to as the “Hilton Millennium”. Further amplification is available in: 2001: A False Flag Space Odyssey (Prison Planet forum 9/7/2010).

Another strange 9/11 correspondence is that the fight takes place as a hurricane is hitting. Sure enough, Hurricane Erin was just off the coast on that fateful day. What’s odd is that Erin played no role in 9/11, and the storm in the movie could have easily been written without it. Make of this what you will but I thought you should be aware.

Of course, much has said about the character “Lincoln Tyler” whose is billed as “The Atlantic City Executioner”. That part is clear enough. Now, there is a very old, very racist joke about black people with the last name Lincoln. The kernel of truth on which it is based is that after emancipation, many took the names of prominent people they admired. We found out one of them was himself a Salem Witch:

Was Abraham Lincoln just some rando born in a log cabin? You won’t think so after hearing who he’s connected to, like the Salem Witches and even more Parkers (conspiracies.win 7/23/2025)

That’s where They got the last name for the script. Tyler? Who knows, random perhaps, but it actually solves another conundrum of the assassination. As the narrative is sold to us, Tyler Robinson had to drive about 270 miles from St. George to Orem to smoke Charlie. For a guy that has nothing but a fake-ass manufactured history of disliking Kirk, that’s a helluva long way to go.

Here’s my solution to that conundrum: Robinson is just a patsy, of course, and could be anybody, but for the weird-ass occult purposes of reenacting this script from 1998, They wished to find someone named Tyler. When they searched around their blood-stained parchments, the closest generational Satanist they could find named Tyler was 270 miles away. Whatever, sign him up.

Speaking of dumbass patsies, no one has mentioned Thomas Matthew Crookes lately. Not in Orem, but the plot in Butler PA, was—in part—supposed to work something like the plot of film. When the killer is immediately killed, that seals it all up. Everybody “knows what happened” and will inquire no further. As much scrutiny as Snake Eyes has undergone, even when people are shown, still they do not see.

The gaping hole in all the analyses of the film is this: it’s an inside job, orchestrated by the head of security. Frankly, it’s the whole crux of the movie, the big reveal being that good old Gary Sinise was the villain all along, and all in a multilayered conspiracy of fakes and reverses. Conspiracy theorists are just grabbing on to the first fake or reverse that appeals to them, but look no further.

We will look further, very further indeed….

The film was both produced and directed by Hollywood AAA-lister Brian De Palma. I thought Greg Carlwood on THC was going to wet his pants when he found out De Palma was born on September 11. It’s meaningless. Remember what I said about Bic lighters?

Greg’s recent dumb disinfo guest Richard Willett was on to talk about Snake Eyes among many other stupid things, but you know what he missed? Brian De Palma’s second wife was Gale Anne Hurd (married 1991 to 1993). Do you know who her first husband was? James Cameron (married 1985 to 1989). Quick trip back to James, was it not?

You can see in the Cameron post that I didn’t spend any time on Hurd, but I think we have to up her importance a couple of notches. Hurd and Cameron met at New World Pictures. Funny, huh? Remember that strange reference by Kash Patel when he mentioned seeing Kirk in Valhalla? Everyone had to pee their pants over that. Turns out that back in 1982, Hurd started her own production company, Valhalla Entertainment. I sort of think Kash knows more than he lets on.

More stuff that dumbass Willett didn’t tell you: Valhalla produced The Walking Dead TV series. That was the first one I ever had to stop watching because it was too gross and violent. The original comic was written by Robert Kirkman. Haha. His collaborator is Cory Walker. We sure saw a lot of Walkers in the last post, didn’t we? (And do you get it? “Walkers”?) Cory was born in Phoenix, where TPUSA is headquartered. All very funny, isn’t it?

Turns out we can keep going. Brian De Palma’s first wife was actress Nancy Allen (married 1979-1984, and yes, a Salem Witch name). After the divorce, she briefly got together with actor Michael Paré. Both of them were in a film released in 1984 called The Philadelphia Experiment. Michael is one of the two lead characters, and the other character’s name is “Jim Parker”. I mentioned that role way back in this post:

Broomstick Crash at Roswell: A shocking number of people involved in the “Incident” have the same last name as people involved in the Salem Witch Trials (conspiracies.win 12/6/2024)

Nancy Allen’s first major role was in Carrie, directed by De Palma, and her second was in I Wanna Hold Your Hand. That film was the directorial debut of Robert Zemeckis. Name ring a bell? He created and directed the Back to the Future trilogy. If there is any media property with more blatant 9/11 predictive programming in it, then I sure don’t know about it.

My point with all these connections is two-fold, and I’ll go in reverse order of importance: (2) When you pull the right threads together, you see what a tight little ball of yarn it really makes. (1) The “trick” of Richard Willett and all others like him is that you will subconsciously conclude his “research” represents the cutting-edge. It does not, nor does mine. Heaven only knows what got by me. If you accept what he hands you, you will stop looking and you will never, ever get from there to here and further on. That’s the point of it.

Concluding rant: There are some big questions we did not address in any of these lengthy posts. I feel, though, that if you comprehended and assimilated all the foregoing information and analysis, your whole perspective on and evaluation of the event changes. I suppose that’s part of the paradigm shift.

For example, did Kirk really die? I think so, yes, but it’s not terribly relevant. “They” either retired one of their own or executed him for his sins against Them. Well, you aren’t one of Them so you run no risk of the same happening to you, do you?

Did Israel do it? Who knows, but if you wish to look into it, their involvement would prove only one thing: that they are subordinate to the Salem Witches. The arrogant bastards would surely have no idea, of course, and never even entertain the thought. Alternatively, you could conclude this was a Zio op and even though everything about it is rife and riven with the goyische Salem Witches, somehow that is all happenstance and has nothing to do with it. But, you know, people will work hard to maintain their worldview.

You also have to wonder if Trump and Vance and the rest of the crew know about Charlie and all the Salem Witch machinations. The glib answer is, “Of course, they’re all in on it together!” which I reject, of course. I will say that I have never heard any of them allude in the faintest way to any of specific knowledge of any of this.

The sole exception is that I saw a late night TV interview some time during Trump’s first term where he said something like, “There are a lot of evil people in this town.” Evil is not a word you use lightly. It’s also not a lot for us to go on.

Even if Trump and the rest know all about it, though, it would be pointless for them to say it publicly. Quite counter-productive, actually. If you doubt that, just save this post and take four minutes to read it aloud at the Thanksgiving table. See what positives come out of that from the people who know exactly who you are and where you came from, have known you the longest, and love you the best. There’s no lesson like an object lesson.

Thanks for taking this long and unplanned trip with me. Hope you enjoyed!

TL;DR: We attempt to investigate the question, “Was Charlie of a Salem Witch bloodline?” We won’t be able to trace Charlie’s genealogy back to the Salem Witch Trials, but we’ll detail some huge clouds of circumstantial smoke. You can decide if there’s a fire.

Advisory: A separate issue is what he was outwardly. That is, none of the argument concerns the features and benefits of his agenda. If you were a fan or agreed with a lot of what he said, that’s fine and you can keep being a fan. We’re here to talk about the context which underlies it all. So no, I’m not badmouthing Jesus or some such thing.

I feel like I never go looking for trouble, as it were. It’s more like it just presents itself to me and I can’t let it pass by without speaking up about it. That’s why this is Part 4 of 2. Frankly, I never even bothered looking into the Charlie Kirk event in the first place. I barely knew who he was and I originally surmised some lone nut with a gun had finally had enough of whatever he was talking about.

Only a couple of weeks ago, I was content to just let it lay with Part 1, where we talked about generational Satanism and the Salem Witches, and Part 2, where we applied that to the murder of Charlie Kirk. Part 3 made it crystal clear that Turning Point USA was a Salem Witch initiative from inception.

Even after all that I knew there were issues left unaddressed, but how far can you take these things when there is so much else to talk about? The question remained: was Charlie Kirk just some dude They picked to be the front man, or was he more than that? A social media post posed a certain question, and pondering it finally pushed me over the edge:

Charlie Kirk- why a public execution? (r/conspiracy 9/23/2025)

You can read my comment on the above as to why it was a public execution. The only other event which shares certain particular characteristics is the assassination of JFK. We’ve seen much evidence along the way that the Salem Witches were behind that. I don’t believe I’ve ever addressed it explicitly and it’s too long to go into here, but it was the public performance of an occult ritual murder.

The Salem Witches have not—as yet—briefed me on their SOPs. However, one of them appears to be that They are not allowed to murder Their enemies. They may seduce and deceive others into doing so for Them, but that’s different. I believe I know the reason but it’s beyond the scope of this post.

However, it does appear that They are allowed to murder those of their own blood. They also seem extremely reluctant to do so, the only circumstance being if one of them ceases cooperation and actively thwarts Them. Even then, the SOP is to fake their death. The most extreme sanction is a public execution, suitably disguised for the commoners.

John Fitzgerald Kennedy was one of their own and he crossed them. Well, frens, what uncomfortable conclusion does that imply regarding Charlie Kirk? Note that the same applies whether you think the assassination was fake or real: Charlie Kirk was a Salem Witch. Unpopular view, right? I’ve said over and over that you will get nowhere near the truth if you seek popularity.

The objection I warned about before but will still get is, “If Charlie Kirk was a Salem Witch, then what nefarious shit was he up to? He was a good Christian and I agreed with a ton of stuff he said. How dare you?” Well, I get what you’re saying but I still dare. There are subtleties to all this, and you can dare to disagree after you understand them.

There’s not a name for what Charlie was, the closest terms being “deep cover” or “sleeper”. If you recall the TV series, The Americans, the parents were Soviet intelligence officers posing as an ordinary American couple. Their children had no knowledge of this but were still involved. Charlie was like one of the children.

The Salem Witches choose as pawns members of their own families. As we saw, the mother of Jim Jones found him so kind and charitable that she believed he was destined to become like his grandfather, Lewis Parker. And indeed, many spoke about how much good work the Peoples Temple did. Before it didn’t.

The subject does not necessarily need to know anything about this. Instead, those closest to him will guide him along, just as we saw in the preceding post. You don’t have to worry about enthusiasm and loyalty from someone who knows they’re saving the world. If the subject goes off the reservation and worse comes to almost worst, people implicitly trust their own family members and someone can be sent to talk them back. We know what happens when worse comes to worst.

Okay then, does any of this model fit Charlie Kirk? We’re going to take a look at Erika, then a connection through Costco, and then a connection through Zionism. After writing that sentence, it may seem like I just had a stroke. You’ll have to keep reading to find out what insights the stroke brought.

As my SOP, you will see that we will get nowhere with the entirely scrubbed genealogy for Charles James Kirk (10/14/1993-9/10/2025), nor with that of the equally well scrubbed Erika Lane Kirk (Frantzve) (11/20/1988-).

One unusual item I noticed was that Erika is significantly older than Charlie, particularly given how young they must have been when they met. They were married in May 2021 when he would have been 27 and she was 32. They began dating in 2019, so 25 and 30 or so. Point is, I can’t think of a single couple I’ve personally known where the female is that much older than the male. Very unusual.

Further emphasizing this anomaly is that Erika Lane is a devout Catholic, a literal beauty queen, and a champion of traditional conservative values. You would think that by 30, she’d have been married a decade and have five or six children. It gets weirder: there are pictures of their children but never with their faces shown, there are no pictures of Erika pregnant either time, and there exists an unexpected association with “Romanian Angels” and allegations of child trafficking. Seriously, have you ever met a person IRL with all this weird shit going on?

Was she a honeypot and Charlie’s handler? I mean, it stacks up that way, doesn’t it? There have been tons of social media posts and mainstream media coverage bashing her from every different angle. I found these attacks on a young widow appalling and touched none of it. Even so, I knew I was giving in to an emotional reaction and thereby running a risk. Is there any truth to any of it? Potentially, and I encourage you to look, but we’re here to talk about things no one else talks about, aren’t we?

I mean, who talks about Costco? Everybody, of course. Okay, that was just a goof but you may be familiar with their house brand, “Kirkland Signature”. It’s called that because Costco used to be headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. How could I connect this to Charlie?

Tons of conspiracy theorists pat themselves on the back when they tell you that “kirk” means “church”. Then they go off in whatever direction pleases them. They didn’t read far enough down the wiki page for “Kirk”. It turns out that every place name in the former British Empire with “kirk” in it is either named after a church or copies from a place in Britain named after a church. Except one.

Kirkland, Washington, is named after a person, Peter Kirk (businessman) (1840-1916). Well, well, a man with Kirk as a surname. Hmmm. Turns out there are at least three other connections. One is that these Salem Witches seem to operate out of specific areas, and I wrote about one of them here:

The DB Cooper Skyhoax: anomalous evidence, the Puget Sound Stronghold, a magic trick, and the Salem Witch Trials (conspiracies.win 6/6/2025)

Microsoft was bafflingly moved to Bellevue, just south of Kirkland, if you happen to find the founder of that organization suspicious. On the page for Kirkland, you find out that the Forbes family was prominent in the settlement of the area in the late 1800’s. We talked a lot about them in:

Meet the Forbes: Opium Wars, hidden aristocracy, Beverly Hills, Salem Witches, Parkers and more (conspiracies.win 8/21/2025)

Just before that, wiki mentions Popham families being initial settlers. Well, it turns out Pophams were involved in the initial European settlement of North America, and they were mentioned in this post related to the fake sinking of the Titanic:

We expose the latest news on the (fake) sinking of the Titan submersible, and find a bonus reference that leads immediately to a monstrous killer, the founding of the British Empire, and pedophilia (surprise!) (conspiracies.win 9/27/2024)

Believe it or else, mention of the Titanic here is not just some anomalous tangent. If I ever get around to another part of this Charlie Kirk material, we will see It again in a most unexpected way.

As to the connection of Charlie to the Salem Witches through Zionism, we’re going to have to be really brief. In short, I haven’t even researched it let alone written it up, but it tentatively looks like the Salem Witches were behind Zionism. That may not come as a surprise at this point, particularly given that Zionism wasn’t underway until the early 1800’s and the Salem Witches were at it in the late 1500’s and probably much earlier.

I had never “tuned in” to Charlie Kirk because I had happened to catch that he was a Zionist. Plenty of probably otherwise good people have and do buy into that, but as I see it, if they can’t find their way past that murderous heretical nonsense, they probably have little chance of possessing any insight into the kind of truth I’m interested in. Zionism was one of Charlie’s most prominent features, though, and many connect it to the reason he was killed (abandoning it, to be specific).

As I said, we’ll have to be brief, so I’m just going to give you a chain of connections and we’ll see what falls out. You can read up on the specific relationships on the wiki pages. From Charlie promoting Zionism, we get: Christian Zionism -> Scofield Reference Bible (1909) -> Cyrus Ingerson Scofield (1843-1921) -> Dwight L. Moody (1837-1899) -> Edward Norris Kirk (1802-1874) -> Mount Vernon Church, Boston (1842).

Salem is just outside Boston, of course. Let’s jump in: In 1892, the church moved and the new building was designed by Charles Howard Walker. The last installment was filled with Walkers! One of the senior ministers is listed as “Albert Parker Fitch (1905–1909)”. I think everyone reading this has already reacted to the mention of a Parker, but Fitch is the one that’s harder to catch.

In the last installment, we mentioned that the mother of Governor Scott Walker was born Patricia Ann Fitch. Also, my very recent post on the 2008 financial crisis focused on the role of credit rating agencies. According to the figures given there, over 44% of the global market is controlled by Moody's Investors Service and Fitch Ratings. Tell me if you can believe this is all pure coincidence.

Finally, it remains for yet another post to analyze the movie you have certainly already heard brought up in this context, Snake Eyes. You’re told “it’s predictive programming” or “it’s all scripted” or “we’re in the Matrix” or “it’s synchromysticism” or some other such nonsense. My post will explain how the movie came to be, but as a necessary part of that explanation, Charlie would have to have been identified as a toddler, later to be groomed. That only seems reasonable if he was one of Them to begin with, and here we have located a Kirk born all the way back in 1802.

Bonus: There’s a quote I forgot to include in the post on the 2008 crisis concerning the power of these credit rating agencies. It’s reprinted on the wiki page for John Moody, the founder of Moody’s, and is from Thomas Friedman:

There are two superpowers in the world today in my opinion. There's the United States and there's Moody's Bond Rating Service. The United States can destroy you by dropping bombs, and Moody's can destroy you by downgrading your bonds. And believe me, it's not clear sometimes who's more powerful. (February 13, 1996 interview with Jim Lehrer)

Interestingly, from being the most fanatical Zionist on the NYT editorial page, Tom Friedman has now changed his mind on Israel in pretty much the same way Charlie Kirk did.

If you found all this surprising, so did I. Thanks very much for reading!

TL;DR: We find Salem Witches at the inception of Charlie Kirk’s career, the founding of TPUSA, and right at the end. We will examine Charlie himself in a future post but I think you know what’s coming.

There is just more and more to a story I had not planned on looking into at all. Wasn’t Charlie Kirk and TPUSA doing just what you or I or any young Christian warrior would be doing in his place: fighting for Truth, Justice, and The American Way? We aren’t here to settle that point but you will find plenty of grist to clog up the gears of that mill here:

Charlie Kirk Was A Traitor to Patriots and Karma Hurts (The Unz Review 9/17/2025)

What I would note is how this—in my model—matches up to the over-the-top “Saint Charlie” type of sentiment that we’re getting now that he’s dead. You see, we are not supposed to minutely examine saints—other than their accepted miracles. We are certainly not to do so not with any eye towards evaluating them in any untoward light. That’s what we’re doing here, BTW.

It’s just one more of the many parallels with JFK. I mean, the Salem Witches saw fit to blow his brains out right in front of us, but they didn’t see fit to badmouth him. It was not until decades had passed, probably about the late 1990’s, that we started to “hear the real truth” about him: he was a womanizer, a drug addict, and a shitty President. These are attempts to get people not to place importance on him, and thus not to care what happened to him. It’s working.

Before we begin there is an observation I have made about my own research that I feel I should highlight. You see, to truly understand just WTF is going on right now, I always end up looking at the foundations of things and tracing backwards through time. Genealogy is a textbook example but the principle applies more generally. I mention that because I so rarely see it.

Rather, researchers are always bent towards the present and rushing forwards. It seems they wish to react, to judge, to condemn, to ridicule, to alarm, to fear-monger, to signal that they were right all along. Above all, they wish to let everyone know that they have “the answer”.

As you can see, none of those are any part of “trying to understand”. I suppose what I’m saying is that if you wish to do any of those things, you should understand that you will never understand. If instead you look to confront your ignorance, correct your errors, and expand your worldview, well then I think you’ve got a shot.

All that being said, let’s look at the foundations….

If you read the “Turning Point USA” section on Charlie’s wiki, there are only two names mentioned. Technically there’s a third, but I will confront you with a jaw-dropping claim about him as a bonus.

The first name is Bill Montgomery (activist). They literally credit him as “Charlie Kirk's mentor”. He’s the founder with Charlie of Turning Point USA (TPUSA):

In May 2012, 18-year-old Charlie Kirk gave a speech at Benedictine University's Youth Government Day. Impressed, retired marketing entrepreneur and Tea Party activist Bill Montgomery encouraged Kirk to postpone college and engage full-time in political activism. A month later, the day after Kirk graduated from high school, they launched Turning Point USA…. Montgomery became Kirk's mentor, and worked behind the scenes handling the paperwork for the organization. Montgomery often described himself as the group's co-founder, although it was not an official recognition by the group or Kirk.

Sounds like Montgomery founded both TPUSA and Kirk, does it not? And from just outside the spotlight, as wiki itself describes. Well then, is Bill a Salem Witch? There’s nothing I have to say about him at the current time save one item.

The scrubbed genealogy for William Thomas Montgomery (1940-2020) basically only admits that he was married to Edith Marie Montgomery (1940-2023). Her scrubbed genealogy admits that she was born Edie Walker. They imply that she was a German immigrant, but I don’t think Walker is a common German surname, do you?

I’ve never written up the Walkers before but let me informally throw a few things at you: In 1635, the James arrived carrying, among others, Richard Walker, John Parker, John Pike, and William Parsons. Recognize any of those names? How about President George Herbert Walker Bush or his son President George Walker Bush? Recent CIA director and possibly deceased Gina Haspel was born Gina Cheri Walker.

Also, do you recall from some decades ago the exact name of the lawyer who was last seen alive at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, before he found himself dead at the park down the road the next morning? It was Vincent Walker Foster Jr. (1945-1993). Far from a cut-and-dried suicided, his story is involved in a much larger and stranger context (this is an older post—I found a fifth):

Four Presidential assassinations (real, fake, attempted, and by) are tied together by the Fosters, Salem Witches, and the name “Rose” (conspiracies.win 1/21/2025)

And, wonders never ceasing, that segues us very directly to the second of the two names mentioned in Charlie’s TPUSA section, Foster Friess (1940-2021):

At the 2012 Republican National Convention, Kirk met Foster Friess, a Republican donor, and persuaded him to make a "five-figure" donation to the organization. Friess also served on the organization's advisory council….

He who pays the piper calls the tune, does he not? I had heard his name long ago, but the only thing that stuck was that I thought his first name was a nickname. Turns out I now have much to say about him, beginning with—surprise!—his first name is not a nickname. His mother was born Ethel Foster. What a coinky-dink, huh? That’s enough for me but as long as we’re here we’ll look a little further.

Friess is supposed to be some sort of right-wing Christian mega-donor. His wiki mentions he donated $100K in 2011 to prevent the recall of Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker. Hmmm, yet another Walker, eh?

BTW, Scott Walker’s mother was born Patricia Ann Fitch. If you saw my last post on the 2008 financial crisis, I skipped over the name Fitch at the end because I literally could not type more into the little box. These research posts are always written concisely since there is always so much more to say.

Bill also supports Rachel's Challenge, a charity named in honor of fake Christian martyr Rachel Scott, who tragically fake perished at the fake Columbine high school psyop. Another Salem Witch name, though. What are the chances?

More appalling is his support for Sandy Hook Promise, in support of the biggest, lamest liars the Salem Witches have ever rolled out. Primary among them, you will recall, is Robbie Parker.

A final tangent: I always describe these Salem Witches showing up just outside the spotlight. I would suggest that it goes deeper, in that they do not see themselves as “walking in the same world” as the rest of us. Perhaps it should be said that they see us as living in some sort of half-light underworld, and that they are above our norms and customs and sensibilities. See if you get that sense from this passage:

Friess often joked about his wealth in public appearances, while at the same time drawing attention to his financial status. In early 2020, he said on his website that his business was worth $15 billion, although in 2012 he had told a reporter that he was not a billionaire.

How meaningless such matters are to them, how beneath them. This should be taken into account in your worldview and analyses.

Short bonus: If there aren’t any in your area, there is a chain of fast-food restaurants specializing in soft-serve ice cream and milkshakes named Fosters Freeze. See why I thought his first name was a nickname? There may instead be a different chain of restaurants in your region which are very similar. In fact, George Foster originally moved to California after WW2 to open locations for that other chain, named Dairy Queen. Seen any fake surveillance pictures from there recently?

Shorter bonus: I could not help noticing that the address for TPUSA in Phoenix is given as “4940 East Beverly Road”. I remind you that Beverly, Massachusetts was originally a part of Salem itself. Hard to tell from Google Maps photos, but the offices in the development along that short road do not look very old. IOW, I suggest someone gave the street that name for reasons other than being a fan of the Hillbillies, and that TPUSA was placed there deliberately.

Possible bonus: Charlie’s wiki notes, “From October 2020 until his death, Kirk hosted a daily three-hour radio talk show, The Charlie Kirk Show, on Salem Media Group’s "The Answer" radio channel.” On the nose! Except, as far as I can tell, there’s nothing sus about the founders of that enterprise.

Further, the name refers to Winston-Salem, North Carolina. We’re told that the “Salem” part of that town refers to something about Moravians in the 1700’s and has nothing to do with the witch town up north. Decide for yourself, but if that is all just a big coincidence, then what a coincidence, right?

Puzzling bonus: There’s something about “Tyler Johnson”. That’s the first name of the patsy plus a Salem Witch surname. The puzzling part is that the name keeps cropping up but I cannot document anyone by that name in Charlie Kirk’s orbit.

I first noticed it in an article by Henry Makow, advocating the thesis that Charlie was executed by his own staff. Well, that’s my thesis too, more or less. It states:

According to Grok 4, the three men standing next to Kirk when he was shot are Tyler "Ty" Johnson in white shirt,Turning Point USA regional field director; handled on-site logistics for the "American Comeback Tour" event.

Positive ID. Except no, no such Tyler Johnson exists working for TPUSA. Alright then, is it simply a very specific AI hallucination? I might accept that but there was an article published two days previously which included accused mute Tyler Robinson’s yearbook photo:

What we know about Tyler Robinson, the Southern Utah man accused of killing Charlie Kirk (St George News 9/12/2025)

Tyler Johnson's yearbook photo from Pine View High School, date and location not specified. Photo courtesy of Justin Hill

See where that’s from? Robinson lived in Washington, which is part of the St. George metro area. He was attending Dixie Technical College in St. George itself. Probably how they got this picture so quickly, like maybe someone on staff had that yearbook. And then they make that particular mistake? Don’t you think this is something more than nothing?

Long bonus: The third and final person mentioned in the TPUSA section of Charlie’s wiki is the purported Governor of California Gavin Newsom. That really caught my eye. I mean, really. Longtime readers might already know why.

I swing for the fences, trying to tear the cover off so we can all see what’s inside. There is a huge on-going conspiracy that I’ve written about many times but never in a “formal” way, just comments here and there trying to explain certain things to people. Anyway, here it is: Gavin Newsom has been dead since early 2022.

“Yikes,” you say, “no way!” Way, and you’re always free to stop reading. We’re not here to argue about it either, but just to talk about how it dovetails into what I’ve had to say about Charlie Kirk. You see, Charlie posted a very long interview with Gavin in March 2025:

Charlie Kirk | FULL Charlie Kirk + Gavin Newsom VIRAL Interview (YouTube 3/7/2025 1:22:49)

Was the interview faked? Believe what you want, but I’ll tell you what I see: Newsom asks what brings Charlie to California. He’s supposedly physically present but they are obviously in front of a green screen (if you take my meaning). I don’t watch Newsom’s podcasts, but I didn’t see any others that were “in person”, always just Zoomed. There is no physical interaction whatsoever between Gavin and Charlie.

Those are the more solid points, but I also find it suspect that they get along famously. Believe it to be authentic if you like. More authentic is the reaction of Charlie’s audience, with the top YouTube comment at 10K votes: “Gavin is the most 2 faced politician I've ever seen. He will truly say anything depending on who he is talking to.” They’re trying to keep this arch scumbag “alive” and relevant, and felt desperate enough to use Charlie to help (among many others previously). They’re failing.

Thanks very much for reading!

TL;DR: Yes, the Salem Witches were ultimately behind the 2008 financial crisis. Maybe that’s not a surprise at this point so I’ll just fill in some of the details.

I want to remind you of the titanic scale of this swindle. The Salem Witches are probably okay with us bitching and moaning about aid to Israel—totaling about $300 billion over 75 years when—with just one “crisis”—they can dip their hands into chests spilling over with dubloons and walk off unseen.

Experts will now tell you the whole bailout ended up anywhere from “profitable” for the government to “not as profitable as it could have been”. Seems dubious, but you can read about many of the gory details in Matt Taibbi’s long article, where we find how much money was floating around:

SECRETS AND LIES OF THE BAILOUT: The federal rescue of Wall Street didn’t fix the economy – it created a permanent bailout state based on a Ponzi-like confidence scheme. (Rolling Stone 1/4/2013)

Even worse, the $700 billion in TARP loans ended up being dwarfed by more than $7.7 trillion in secret emergency lending that the Fed awarded to Wall Street – loans that were only disclosed to the public after Congress forced an extraordinary one-time audit of the Federal Reserve. The extent of this “secret bailout” didn’t come out until November 2011, when Bloomberg Markets, which went to court to win the right to publish the data, detailed how the country’s biggest firms secretly received trillions in near-free money throughout the crisis.

One incident we might highlight was the daring daylight caper of the sale of Merrill Lynch to Bank of America. We are told:

Trading partners' loss of confidence in Merrill Lynch's solvency… ultimately led to its sale.... Later that day [September 14], Merrill Lynch was sold to Bank of America…. This price represented a 70.1% premium over the September 12 closing price….

Congressional testimony by Bank of America CEO Kenneth Lewis, as well as internal emails released by the House Oversight Committee, indicated that the merger was transacted under pressure from federal officials, who said that they would otherwise seek the replacement of Bank of America's management as a condition of any government assistance.

I refer you to Mercy Lewis, "an accuser during the Salem Witch Trials", but Merrill itself also looks like a Salem Witch(tm) company. It was founded in 1914 by Charles Edward Merrill (1885-1956). There’s no direct connection that I found (yet), but if you start with his genealogy and drive backwards through his paternal line, you arrive at Nathaniel Merrill II (1601-1655).

Nathaniel lived in Newbury, MA, which is 13 miles north of Salem Village. Also noteworthy is that Ben Franklin’s maternal grandmother was Mary Folger, born Mary Morrell/Morrel/Morrill/Morrills/Morill. No genealogy for her, so it indicates to me that we’re touching a third rail.

Alright, so Merrill gets in deep kimchi then BofA pays 170 cents on the dollar for a company circling the drain. Sound right to you? No. What we see is that if the BofA oligarchs don’t let themselves get robbed, the feds will boot them out and not allow them rob America. And Smedley Darlington Butler thought war was a racket.

Now let’s go to the movies. You may have been under the impression that many of the details had already been filled in by the very popular 2015 film, The Big Short, and the highly-promoted 2010 nonfiction book on which it was based, also titled The Big Short. Hell, that book even received the Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights Book Award for 2011. Great job outing those financial dirty dealers, Michael Lewis! (Another Lewis already.)

There is a psywar trick at play, particularly with the film, in which viewers assume it to be compressed and “jazzed up” due to the necessities of the format. You end up thinking, “Well, it may not have been quite that bad, but it was still pretty bad.” The trick: a box is drawn around who did what and who was to blame. You will never, ever look outside that box. The Salem Witches always stand just outside the box.

Due to the complex nature of the situation, the film resorted to capturing your attention by using Margot Robbie in a bubble bath to do some exposition. Actually, go ahead and watch that clip because the beginning of it explains that the complexity of the financial system is itself part of the Wall Street “gag”.

I’m no Margot Robbie and her particular exposition isn’t important for our purposes, so I’ll rely on a couple of choice scenes and a bit of choice dialogue and we’ll go from there:

THE BIG SHORT - BEST SCENE, SHORTS TURN THE TABLES ON WALL STREET

[1:40] Dr. Michael Burry, operator of hedge fund Scion Capital [Christian Bale]: Where do you have our position marked?.... What? Can you explain that to me please? Because how can the value of an insurance contract not be affected by the demise of the very thing it insures?... They are correlated!”

[later] Finance Bro #1: This is fucking insane! You realize that? These people are crooks and they should be in prison!

Finance Bro #2: This is a massive story! Who wouldn’t publish it?

[later] Wall Street Journal journalist bro: No bank or ratings agency is gonna confirm a story like this.

The Big Short (2015) - FrontPoint Partners confronts Morgan Stanley Risk Assessors and S&P

[0:58] Mark Baum, leader of FrontPoint Partners [Steve Carrell]: So subprime loans go bad, but subprime bonds—which are made up of subprime loans—are more valuable?!... What about the ratings agencies? Moody’s, S&P? Are they downgrading the CDOs or mortgage bonds?

Finance Bro #3: Nope, they’re all still triple-A.

Baum: What the hell?! Are you fucking kidding me? Those fuckers, those motherfuckers!

[later, at Standard & Poor’s Rating Agency] Baum: Georgia, have you ever refused to rate any of these bond upper tranches triple-A?... Can you name one time in the past year where you checked the tape and you didn’t give the banks the triple-A percentage they wanted?

Georgia: If we don’t give them the ratings they’ll go to Moody’s, right down the block. If we don’t work with them, they’ll go to our competitors. Not our fault, simply the way the world works.

By the time you get to the end of this, you may agree that the way the world works is actually much darker than even S&P’s Georgia would have Mark Baum and all the rest of us believe. Before we get there, we have to get through a brief, boring lecture because I have to stress where the eye of the shitstorm really was in the 2008 crisis.

A gargantuan assload of financial instruments are bought and sold based on a system of valuation which assign a “credit rating”. You can think of it like buying refurb cellphones off Amazon that are “like new”, “excellent”, “very good”, “good”, “not too good at all”. That does not determine the dollars and cents you end up paying, but it will clearly will affect the price.

Ideally, everyone will agree on standards, and those standards will be applied by neutral parties. That role for the international financial world is filled by credit rating agencies. Their decisions influence bajillions of dollars scattered across profuse financial instruments of numerous different types.

What was happening at the heart of those two scenes was that the credit rating agencies were refusing to lower credit ratings when they should have. These were stepped-on and smoking cell phones still rated “factory fresh”. Can you guess who those fuckers, those motherfuckers were? It turns out we will not require an extensive analysis:

Credit rating is a highly concentrated industry, with the "Big Three" credit rating agencies controlling approximately 94% of the ratings business. Standard & Poor's (S&P) controls 50.0% of the global market with Moody's Investors Service controlling 31.7%,and Fitch Ratings controlling a further 12.5%.

In fact, you heard S&P and Moody’s referenced in the second clip. Watch the whole scene and Georgia felt we were all in quite a pickle. That is some bullshit right there.

Let’s knock half of it down right away and examine S&P Global Ratings, founded in 1860 by Henry Varnum Poor (1812-1905). Shall we browse around his genealogy a bit?

Henry’s grandfather was Dea. Ebenezer Poor (1732-1809). Eb had a sister named Deborah Poor and she married Stephen Barker, III (1719-1785). His grandfather was Lieutenant Stephen Barker (1659-1740).

I didn’t even bother looking up whether Stephen was personally involved in the kabuki, but at least four others of his immediate family were. For example, his sister-in-law was Abigail Barker (1656-1743), “among those accused of witchcraft during the Salem witch trials”.

Now we turn to Moody's Ratings, which Georgia of S&P told us was right down the block. They are much closer than her comment would have us think. Moody’s was founded by John Moody (financial analyst) (1868-1958). Weirdly, there’s no genealogy for a guy that seems pretty boring. We can locate his father, William Francis Moody (1834-1919), but that goes nowhere. Almost.

William’s wife was Sarah Jane Nichols (1839-1897), and we can trace her line back to Abraham Nichols (1662-1735), alive at the time of the trials. I don’t want to get bogged down, but you can see right on his page a Martin and a Hale. These people were all in Fairfield County, CT, so I’d say what we have is some outpost of the Salem Witches.

If that weak connection wasn’t enough for you (it wasn’t for me), it turns out Moody’s was owned from 1962 to 2000 by the mighty Dun & Bradstreet. We are told:

In March 1933, R. G. Dun & Company merged with competitor John M. Bradstreet to form today's Dun & Bradstreet.

That “John M. Bradstreet” is nearly a ghost. There was, however, literally a guy named John Bradstreet, (1652-1718), "an accused witch during the Salem Witch Trials". Are they related?

We would like to try to get from the genealogical record of the money-man John M. Bradstreet to that of the witch John Bradstreet. The page for the financier says, “Child of Randolph Meeker and Lydia Bradstreet”. That’s weird because (1) the terminology on the site has always been “Son of” and (2) John’s surname isn’t Meeker and (3) Lydia’s maiden name is not Bradstreet. The additional weird thing is that the portraits used on the two pages are the same guy. Frens, we are not getting off the dime with John M.

The analysis for Dun of D&B is both solid and outrageous. Robert Graham Dun was just handed a company he renamed R. G. Dun & Company, but the backstory cracks open the containment vessel and reveals the reactor core:

Dun & Bradstreet traces its history to July 20, 1841, with formation of The Mercantile Agency in New York City by Lewis Tappan. Recognizing the need for a centralized credit reporting system, Tappan formed the company to create a network of correspondents who would provide reliable, objective credit information to subscribers.

As mentioned, the gargantuan global grift revolved around credit reporting agencies. Also, how do you like having a credit score? Turns out this was the inception of both with the advent of “credit reporting”.

Note that you can’t get from that very long page back to where we just saw the concept invented. Neither can you do so from the page on “Credit score in the United States”, which does not even begin the history until the 1950’s. See how history is really (re)written?

So who was this Lewis Tappan (1788-1873) that we have to thank for all this? If you begin with his genealogy, you find his great-aunt was Abigail Noyes (1707-1787). Her husband was Daniel Noyes (1703-1765). His grandfather’s brother was Reverend Nicholas Noyes, Jr. (1647-1717). You can read all about his big dumb fake witch adventures and that of the rest of his family on the page for Nicholas Noyes.

Bonus (kinda): We skipped over it, so let me just make one comment on Fitch Ratings, which we are told represents only 12.5% of the market. It was founded by John Knowles Fitch. “Knowles” represents his mother’s bloodline, and it’s scrubbed. However, do you remember the AAA-rated MK-ULTRA entertainer/entrepreneur married to a weird rapper/Illuminati billionaire, the one who was accused of “extreme witchcraft” back in 2018? She was born Beyoncé Giselle Knowles.

Thanks so much for reading! Hope you enjoyed and/or were outraged!

TL;DR: Yes, the Salem Witches were ultimately behind the 2008 financial crisis. Maybe that’s not a surprise at this point so I’ll just fill in some of the details.

I want to remind you of the titanic scale of this swindle. The Salem Witches are probably okay with us bitching and moaning about aid to Israel—totaling about $300 billion over 75 years when—with just one “crisis”—they can dip their hands into chests spilling over with dubloons and walk off unseen.

Experts will now tell you the whole bailout ended up anywhere from “profitable” for the government to “not as profitable as it could have been”. Seems dubious, but you can read about many of the gory details in Matt Taibbi’s long article, where we find how much money was floating around:

SECRETS AND LIES OF THE BAILOUT: The federal rescue of Wall Street didn’t fix the economy – it created a permanent bailout state based on a Ponzi-like confidence scheme. (Rolling Stone 1/4/2013)

Even worse, the $700 billion in TARP loans ended up being dwarfed by more than $7.7 trillion in secret emergency lending that the Fed awarded to Wall Street – loans that were only disclosed to the public after Congress forced an extraordinary one-time audit of the Federal Reserve. The extent of this “secret bailout” didn’t come out until November 2011, when Bloomberg Markets, which went to court to win the right to publish the data, detailed how the country’s biggest firms secretly received trillions in near-free money throughout the crisis.

One incident we might highlight was the daring daylight caper of the sale of Merrill Lynch to Bank of America. We are told:

Trading partners' loss of confidence in Merrill Lynch's solvency… ultimately led to its sale.... Later that day [September 14], Merrill Lynch was sold to Bank of America…. This price represented a 70.1% premium over the September 12 closing price….

Congressional testimony by Bank of America CEO Kenneth Lewis, as well as internal emails released by the House Oversight Committee, indicated that the merger was transacted under pressure from federal officials, who said that they would otherwise seek the replacement of Bank of America's management as a condition of any government assistance.

I refer you to Mercy Lewis, "an accuser during the Salem Witch Trials", but Merrill itself also looks like a Salem Witch(tm) company. It was founded in 1914 by Charles Edward Merrill (1885-1956). There’s no direct connection that I found (yet), but if you start with his genealogy and drive backwards through his paternal line, you arrive at Nathaniel Merrill II (1601-1655).

Nathaniel lived in Newbury, MA, which is 13 miles north of Salem Village. Also noteworthy is that Ben Franklin’s maternal grandmother was Mary Folger, born Mary Morrell/Morrel/Morrill/Morrills/Morill. No genealogy for her, so it indicates to me that we’re touching a third rail.

Alright, so Merrill gets in deep kimchi then BofA pays 170 cents on the dollar for a company circling the drain. Sound right to you? No. What we see is that if the BofA oligarchs don’t let themselves get robbed, the feds will boot them out and not allow them rob America. And Smedley Darlington Butler thought war was a racket.

Now let’s go to the movies. You may have been under the impression that many of the details had already been filled in by the very popular 2015 film, The Big Short, and the highly-promoted 2010 nonfiction book on which it was based, also titled The Big Short. Hell, that book even received the Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights Book Award for 2011. Great job outing those financial dirty dealers, Michael Lewis! (Another Lewis already.)

There is a psywar trick at play, particularly with the film, in which viewers assume it to be compressed and “jazzed up” due to the necessities of the format. You end up thinking, “Well, it may not have been quite that bad, but it was still pretty bad.” The trick: a box is drawn around who did what and who was to blame. You will never, ever look outside that box. The Salem Witches always stand just outside the box.

Due to the complex nature of the situation, the film resorted to capturing your attention by using Margot Robbie in a bubble bath to do some exposition. Actually, go ahead and watch that clip because the beginning of it explains that the complexity of the financial system is itself part of the Wall Street “gag”.

I’m no Margot Robbie and her particular exposition isn’t important for our purposes, so I’ll rely on a couple of choice scenes and a bit of choice dialogue and we’ll go from there:

THE BIG SHORT - BEST SCENE, SHORTS TURN THE TABLES ON WALL STREET

[1:40] Dr. Michael Burry, operator of hedge fund Scion Capital [Christian Bale]: Where do you have our position marked?.... What? Can you explain that to me please? Because how can the value of an insurance contract not be affected by the demise of the very thing it insures?... They are correlated!”

[later] Finance Bro #1: This is fucking insane! You realize that? These people are crooks and they should be in prison!

Finance Bro #2: This is a massive story! Who wouldn’t publish it?

[later] Wall Street Journal journalist bro: No bank or ratings agency is gonna confirm a story like this.

The Big Short (2015) - FrontPoint Partners confronts Morgan Stanley Risk Assessors and S&P

[0:58] Mark Baum, leader of FrontPoint Partners [Steve Carrell]: So subprime loans go bad, but subprime bonds—which are made up of subprime loans—are more valuable?!... What about the ratings agencies? Moody’s, S&P? Are they downgrading the CDOs or mortgage bonds?

Finance Bro #3: Nope, they’re all still triple-A.

Baum: What the hell?! Are you fucking kidding me? Those fuckers, those motherfuckers!

[later, at Standard & Poor’s Rating Agency] Baum: Georgia, have you ever refused to rate any of these bond upper tranches triple-A?... Can you name one time in the past year where you checked the tape and you didn’t give the banks the triple-A percentage they wanted?

Georgia: If we don’t give them the ratings they’ll go to Moody’s, right down the block. If we don’t work with them, they’ll go to our competitors. Not our fault, simply the way the world works.

By the time you get to the end of this, you may agree that the way the world works is actually much darker than even S&P’s Georgia would have Mark Baum and all the rest of us believe. Before we get there, we have to get through a brief, boring lecture because I have to stress where the eye of the shitstorm really was in the 2008 crisis.

A gargantuan assload of financial instruments are bought and sold based on a system of valuation which assign a “credit rating”. You can think of it like buying refurb cellphones off Amazon that are “like new”, “excellent”, “very good”, “good”, “not too good at all”. That does not determine the dollars and cents you end up paying, but it will clearly will affect the price.

Ideally, everyone will agree on standards, and those standards will be applied by neutral parties. That role for the international financial world is filled by credit rating agencies. Their decisions influence bajillions of dollars scattered across profuse financial instruments of numerous different types.

What was happening at the heart of those two scenes was that the credit rating agencies were refusing to lower credit ratings when they should have. These were stepped-on and smoking cell phones still rated “factory fresh”. Can you guess who those fuckers, those motherfuckers were? It turns out we will not require an extensive analysis:

Credit rating is a highly concentrated industry, with the "Big Three" credit rating agencies controlling approximately 94% of the ratings business. Standard & Poor's (S&P) controls 50.0% of the global market with Moody's Investors Service controlling 31.7%,and Fitch Ratings controlling a further 12.5%.

In fact, you heard S&P and Moody’s referenced in the second clip. Watch the whole scene and Georgia felt we were all in quite a pickle. That is some bullshit right there.

Let’s knock half of it down right away and examine S&P Global Ratings, founded in 1860 by Henry Varnum Poor (1812-1905). Shall we browse around his genealogy a bit?

Henry’s grandfather was Dea. Ebenezer Poor (1732-1809). Eb had a sister named Deborah Poor and she married Stephen Barker, III (1719-1785). His grandfather was Lieutenant Stephen Barker (1659-1740).

I didn’t even bother looking up whether Stephen was personally involved in the kabuki, but at least four others of his immediate family were. For example, his sister-in-law was Abigail Barker (1656-1743), “among those accused of witchcraft during the Salem witch trials”.

Now we turn to Moody's Ratings, which Georgia of S&P told us was right down the block. They are much closer than her comment would have us think. Moody’s was founded by John Moody (financial analyst) (1868-1958). Weirdly, there’s no genealogy for a guy that seems pretty boring. We can locate his father, William Francis Moody (1834-1919), but that goes nowhere. Almost.

William’s wife was Sarah Jane Nichols (1839-1897), and we can trace her line back to Abraham Nichols (1662-1735), alive at the time of the trials. I don’t want to get bogged down, but you can see right on his page a Martin and a Hale. These people were all in Fairfield County, CT, so I’d say what we have is some outpost of the Salem Witches.

If that weak connection wasn’t enough for you (it wasn’t for me), it turns out Moody’s was owned from 1962 to 2000 by the mighty Dun & Bradstreet. We are told:

In March 1933, R. G. Dun & Company merged with competitor John M. Bradstreet to form today's Dun & Bradstreet.

That “John M. Bradstreet” is nearly a ghost. There was, however, literally a guy named John Bradstreet, (1652-1718), "an accused witch during the Salem Witch Trials". Are they related?

We would like to try to get from the genealogical record of the money-man John M. Bradstreet to that of the witch John Bradstreet. The page for the financier says, “Child of Randolph Meeker and Lydia Bradstreet”. That’s weird because (1) the terminology on the site has always been “Son of” and (2) John’s surname isn’t Meeker and (3) Lydia’s maiden name is not Bradstreet. The additional weird thing is that the portraits used on the two pages are the same guy. Frens, we are not getting off the dime with John M.

The analysis for Dun of D&B is both solid and outrageous. Robert Graham Dun was just handed a company he renamed R. G. Dun & Company, but the backstory cracks open the containment vessel and reveals the reactor core:

Dun & Bradstreet traces its history to July 20, 1841, with formation of The Mercantile Agency in New York City by Lewis Tappan. Recognizing the need for a centralized credit reporting system, Tappan formed the company to create a network of correspondents who would provide reliable, objective credit information to subscribers.

As mentioned, the gargantuan global grift revolved around credit reporting agencies. Also, how do you like having a credit score? Turns out this was the inception of both with the advent of “credit reporting”.

Note that you can’t get from that very long page back to where we just saw the concept invented. Neither can you do so from the page on “Credit score in the United States”, which does not even begin the history until the 1950’s. See how history is really (re)written?

So who was this Lewis Tappan (1788-1873) that we have to thank for all this? If you begin with his genealogy, you find his great-aunt was Abigail Noyes (1707-1787). Her husband was Daniel Noyes (1703-1765). His grandfather’s brother was Reverend Nicholas Noyes, Jr. (1647-1717). You can read all about his big dumb fake witch adventures and that of the rest of his family on the page for Nicholas Noyes.

Bonus (kinda): We skipped over it, so let me just make one comment on Fitch Ratings, which we are told represents only 12.5% of the market. It was founded by John Knowles Fitch. “Knowles” represents his mother’s bloodline, and it’s scrubbed. However, do you remember the AAA-rated MK-ULTRA entertainer/entrepreneur married to a weird rapper/Illuminati billionaire, the one who was accused of “extreme witchcraft” back in 2018? She was born Beyoncé Giselle Knowles.

Thanks so much for reading! Hope you enjoyed and/or were outraged!

TL;DR: The Rockefeller family traces back to the Salem Witches. There is something to the backstory which I found quite illuminating concerning the time scales in which the Elites really operate.

Advisory: There is a ton of evidence and analysis concerning the Rockefellers and Salem Witches that I’m leaving out just to have room to make the basic case. It’s the interesting part concerning some arcane genealogy. You can consider this very much the “floor” of research on the subject.

Let me ask you, is there a more prominent oligarchic dynasty post-War of Northern Aggression than the Rockefellers? I mean, what was the name of J.P. Morgan’s son? IDK. Do you really think Musk’s son C-3PO will carry on in the spirit of Elon, whatever that may be? Of course not. If we left wealth out, then how many generations can we count among influential Kennedys? Is there even an RFK Jr. Jr.? Who knows, so three generations, right? (No one wants to talk about Blackjack.) Point is, I would contend the Rockefellers are in a class of their own.

In conspiracy theory circles you simply cannot go very long without hearing the name mentioned, given that they’ve been all over the map of Conspiracy Land, from “robber barons” to 911. After I heard some random mention of them, the question finally occurred to me: “I wonder if…?”

It would be, in my opinion and at this point, exceedingly weird but not impossible that the Salem Witches were behind so much, yet this uniquely powerful family had just bubbled up out of nowhere and commenced very much the same kind of social engineering activities the Salem Witches are behind.

If these were these two independent centers of powers, a purely spurious connection between the Rockefellers and the Salem Witches would be extraordinarily unlikely. I mean, I’ve never even met a person who told me they’d been to Salem as a tourist or for any other reason.

So is there a connection? The answer is yes… and no… and something more interesting than even that first yes. I will now explain that enigmatic answer.

As a first order of housekeeping, we need to dismiss the weak-ass diversion handed out in wiki’s “Background” section. It talks about their German ancestry and exactly what brand of Christians they are. Conspiracy theorists will either parrot it blindly, follow up on it, or dispute it. And there’s the trap: it’s meaningless and I didn’t read more than the tiny bit necessary to see it was about Germans and Christians.

The subconscious conclusion we have all drawn about the origins of the Rockefellers is that Senior was just a dirtbag who was very greedy and got very lucky. However, as far as I can tell at this time, the Salem Witches picked a Rockefeller out of a conical black sorting hat and proceeded to create The Rockefellers. There may in fact be more to why they were selected but I have no evidence to offer at this time along those lines. You’ll see their real origins in a minute.

As a second order of housekeeping, we’ll skim the list of Rockefeller “Associates” and compare it to the familiar list of people of the Salem witch trials and others we have gathered along the way. The names that I have come across in the Salem Witch research are: Samuel P. Bush, Henry Clay Folger, Jerome Davis Greene, Richard Dean Parsons, Pratt family, Charles H. Percy, and Henry Morgan Tilford.

From the page for the founder of their feast, we find that he was started in business as a junior partner of Maurice B. Clark (1827-1901) and George W. Gardner (1834-1911).

None of those specific people have been written up before and we don’t have the space to do it now. A brief look showed them all connected to the Salem Witches. Rewriting history is an elephant we will have to eat one bite at a time, so we need to press on with the family at hand. Already quite a list, though, eh?

Given that the second order of housekeeping already makes a prima facie case for the thesis, we can address the third order of housekeeping: apprising the strongest disinfo “They” sent to us about the Rockefellers. That would be from Miles Mathis, of course. He addresses the Rockefellers in two papers:

Kabbalah, Hermeticism and the Occult (9/15/2015 27-page PDF)

If the de' Medicis were crypto-Jews, is it possible the Rockefellers are as well?

That’s the very first thing he ever says about them. See where it’s headed? It’s all high-octane nonsense after that and you can read it if you like. You can even believe it too, since some of it might actually be true. The point is, it will all get you nowhere.

More on the Rockefellers (6/10/2018 4-page PDF)

Well, the big clue is the middle name Avery, which is also linked to the Livingstons.

That is the fourth sentence of the paper, and it’s as close as he’s going to get you to anything useful. Afterwards, he puts the pedal to the metal and drives you away from there on a thrilling ride to Everyonesajewville. I told you we were going to Salem, though, so let’s begin….

I’ll tell you how it went for me, because there was none of the high-falutin’ Jew huntin’ of Miles Mathis. It was good old (Salem) witch huntin’! To begin, I went right to the most familiar of the Rockefellers, the founder of the dynasty (or so we are to believe), John Davison Rockefeller Sr. (1839-1937). Nothing there, so back to his father, William Avery "Devil Bill" Rockefeller Sr. (1810-1906). Nothing there either. I tend to give up when things don’t go easily, but I went back one more generation to his father, Godfrey Lewis Rockefeller (1783-1857). Eureka!

Lucy Avery's ancestors were Puritans who had emigrated from Devon, England, to Salem, Massachusetts, in about 1630.

I suppose that wasn’t so bad, was it? Took me about three minutes but somehow Miles Mathis missed it. Funny, huh? But seriously, what are the chances of there being a connection like this purely by happenstance? Come up with whatever number you like, but personally I’d say it rounds down to zero percent. So are the Rockefellers actually Salem Witches? The answer is “yes”. Case closed!

Well, in past times I would have said that, but I feel like my research skills have improved so I thought I would flesh out the documentation. The writeup would be pretty short otherwise, but this is where we get to the “no” part of the answer. You see, I simply could not connect the Avery line to the Salem Witch Trials. Not right then, anyway, but stay tuned. Let me fill you in on the genealogical trouble.

We begin with Lucy (Avery) Rockefeller (1786-1867). Go back five generations and you get to the guys that came to the colonies during the Puritan Great Migration, Capt. James Avery (1621-1700) and his father, Christopher Avery (1590-1679). His father before him was Christopher Avery Sr. (about 1550-1613). The genealogy gives out there.

One the flip side, we have fake witch Sarah Wildes (née Averell/Averill) (1627-1692). Her father was William Averill (1600-1652), his father was Edward Averill (about 1550-1617), and his father was another William Averill (1525-1606). Again, the genealogy runs out there.

Don’t get thrown by the different names. It’s acknowledged that Avery and Averill and Averell are all variants of one another. Even within a given version, Jesus, you should see some of the spellings. That’s not the problem. The two families were also more than a hundred miles apart. You can see for yourself that I came up empty on this one. No connection.

But that brings us to “something more interesting than even that first yes”. Don’t you agree it was a huge coincidence finding Rockefeller+Salem in the first place? I could not let it go. It was like click-click-click-click-click all back and forth over those records above for quite a while until, at long last, it clicked. Here’s what I came up with….

See the William Averill b1525? You have to look in the text of his WikiTree page, but in addition to Edward, he had two other sons, Philip and Richard. They have no biographical information at all. Now follow me on this: what if his first child was born a bastard? That was a big deal in those days, with a special derogatory name and everything. What if he sent that bastard a hundred miles away, telling him that instead of Averill, he would go by the variant Avery.

Is he the Christopher Sr. from the Rockefeller line as listed above? The birthdates of Christopher Avery Sr. and his possible younger brother Edward Averill are both “about 1550”, so that fits pretty precisely. Christopher’s father is unknown so there’s no direct evidence to disprove it. Not much to go on and okay, I get it, this is all a helluva long bow to draw. But you know what? I’ll draw it much further.

See, these Salem Witches we’ve been talking about are generational Satanists, and when you hear “generational” you picture that the freak parents bring their kids into it and make them freaks, too. Simply repeating the cycle, that’s the gist of it. But I want to show you the scale is far grander than that, and something which needs to be incorporated in your worldview and analysis.

As I put it together, “They” figured out they would need something like “The Rockefellers” in the future. What I mean is that They work through fronts, and for one of the fronts They wanted an oligarchic dynasty. In addition to the obvious utility, the fail-safe is that if the peasants ever get fed up and grab their torches and pitchforks, it’s gonna be the people that They maneuvered into the castle who get dragged over the security wall.

I’ll go further as we consider the timeline. I claim They had this idea before the time of the Puritan Great Migration, which started in 1620. Then it’s almost two centuries until bloodline Salem Witch Lucy Avery marries Godfrey Lewis Rockefeller (1783-1857) in 1806. Look what a total loser he was:

Godfrey was said to be outmatched by his wife, who was taller, more confident, and better educated than Godfrey. Godfrey himself was said to have a "stunted, impoverished look and a hangdog air of perpetual defeat". He was also said to be jovial and good-natured, but his propensity to drink upset his wife.

Try to convince yourself Lucy was not set up as his handler to operationalize Project OLIGARCH. And they stayed losers nobodies, too, until John D. started hitting it big after the Civil War. To be precise, I mentioned two other presumed Salem Witches just outside the spotlight that made him hit it big. That’s the pattern we’ve seen innumerable times. And note that debut is not for another 60 years, in total two and a half centuries from inception of the plan.

This timeline is an incredibly tall claim, but I could not get the scenario out of my mind after I came across one tiny bit of historical info to seal it. You’ll find it on the WikiTree page for Chris Sr. Be aware, the genealogists got crossed up and they don’t realize it actually applies to Chris Jr. It was he and his son James who made the crossing to the New World. Anyway, this old genealogical note says:

The only support for a son John of this couple is this line: "This Christopher Avery of Ipplepen is he who later left Devon with his only son to become the founder of a great family in the New World... The register of that church for that period is sadly mutilated but it seems to show that our Christopher had a brother John, who had a son John, who was baptized on the fourth of June, 1616."

“Left to become the founder of a great family” written in 1616? By the way, the New World was a howling wilderness at that time, so far as we are told. I have never read anything like that passage in all the hundreds of genealogy pages I’ve looked at. And as we discussed at the beginning, there has not been another family like the Rockefellers.

As “out there” as the theory is, well, how big a coincidence do we have to have to come to the view that it’s not a coincidence at all?

Thank so much for reading!

TL;DR: We’ll discuss the identical twin to the Ludlow Massacre and figure out why you’ve never seen it mentioned. This post is the second part of:

A tale of (one of) two massacres: the Ludlow Massacre was staged which is why you’re allowed to talk about it (also, the Salem Witches and yes, I found the Parker) (conspiracies.win 9/4/2025)

The first thing to realize is that this massacre is so low-profile it doesn’t even have an “official” name. We’re going to call it the “Forbes Massacre”. This is all wiki has to say about it on the Ludlow Massacre page:

On March 10, 1914, a replacement worker's body was found on the railroad tracks near Forbes, Colorado. The National Guard said the strikers had murdered the man. In retaliation, [Colorado National Guard General John] Chase ordered the Forbes tent colony destroyed.

“That’s not a massacre,” you say. Correct, it isn’t. That Wiki page does not even reference the other massacre at all. Probably the most important thing to understand about how history is written is that it is always shaped by leaving out context. Since Ludlow is always discussed—even by conspiracy theorists—as an isolated incident where the “pot boiled over”, the mind automatically and reasonably and incorrectly assumes that was the only notable event that occurred.

The larger context was the Colorado Coalfield War of 1913-1914. On that page, wiki at least gives us two paragraphs on the “Battle of Forbes, 30 April”, only ten days after Ludlow and about five miles south. Wiki summarizes it thusly:

Strikers were initially repulsed by machine gun fire, but the weapon quickly became jammed, encouraging the attackers to charge into the camp and set most of the structures alight…. In total, nine of the Forbes camp were killed, including four Japanese strikebreakers. At least three strikers were killed by returning fire, including two by the machine gun.

It’s like they found a writer who does the exact opposite of someone hyping a shitty movie. This article paints the scene a bit more vividly for us:

Regional History – We remembered Ludlow but forgot Forbes (World Journal Newspaper 2/7/2019)

The estimated 300 strikers kept up a relentless barrage on the camp, then ran through camp throwing oil on the tipple and buildings, all the while shouting “Remember Ludlow!”. Even the mule barn was set ablaze, killing 37 mules and horses…. The entire camp, tipple, company buildings, homes, boardinghouses, barns, even the post office, were leveled by flames. The county coroner later revealed he had received a dozen bodies from this conflict.

That’s the movie you want to see, isn’t it? Has a lot more of a “rampage-y” feel. For the closest first-hand source, the local paper covered it in this brief article:

15 MEN KILLED IN BATTLE AT FORBES | Denver Weekly Post, Volume 11, Number 647, May 9, 1914 (Colorado Historic Newspapers Collection)

You really need to go look at the newspaper layout, though, because the article about this massacre is adjacent to an advertisement for “Book of Personal Advice Free to Any Man” which is twice the column-inches. Imagine all we would have to hear today if fifteen trannies got killed.

Let’s summarize the numbers. For Ludlow using “modern estimates”, we get 19 strikers (5 men, 2 women, 12 children) and 1 strikebreaker. For Forbes, we get 4 strikers (no bystanders) and 11 strikebreakers, with the entire mining camp destroyed. Starting to see why “They” don’t want you to know about Forbes?

“They” got their asses handed to them. The mine superintendent didn’t even bother calling the sheriff. The local militia was already tied up at the nearby Battle of Walsenberg. The governor and the National Guard stood down. They weren’t going to tangle with 300 armed and angry working men. The Weekly Post article mentions this near the end:

Nine of the mine guards who escaped from the camp were taken prisoners by the strikers, who threatened to put them to death on the spot.

Forbes could have been way worse. “They” took a gigantic “L” and that’s why you’ve never heard of it. As a rule, any time “They” take a big loss, it gets Memory Holed as quickly as possible. As part of learned helplessness, you don’t ever get to know that you’re not helpless. They don’t deny what happened or try very hard to rewrite history, it just gets swept away, filed under “Things We Don’t Talk About”.

Another perfect example: the Georgia Guidestones. Did you wonder exactly what happened? There was never even a rumor of who did it but I can tell you for a fact “They” took another big “L” on that one. The earth was literally scraped clean within a couple of days. The local sheriff didn’t try looking for the perps or even announce, “Hey, just so everyone knows: you can’t go around blowing up shit that doesn’t belong to you.” How could that be so, here in Gitmo Nation? The Salem Witches, that’s how.

Exact same thing with Forbes. Eleven manslaughters and a whole mine destroyed, and there is no evidence whatsoever that any authority anywhere at any time tried to hold anyone responsible for any of it. They lost and so They slammed the door shut on it. They came back at it another time in another way, but that’s a story for another day.

As for this Forbes Mine, you can forget about digging up any background info on it. The articles I linked are about all we have to go on. Starting with the name “Forbes”, though, we found out how dark and suspicious they are:

Meet the Forbes: Opium Wars, hidden aristocracy, Beverly Hills, Salem Witches, Parkers and more (conspiracies.win 8/21/2025)

Is the name of the mine mere coincidence? Sure, maybe. But we also found some Salem names in this writeup:

From Dr. Joseph P. Farrell to Linda Moulton-Howe to John Cusack: the wacky and hidden genealogy of the Nichols family of Salem Witches (conspiracies.win 8/27/2025)

Namely the names were Nichols and Martin. And what did we find at the massacres? The Forbes Mine superintendent was Robert Nichols and the local undersheriff was Zeke Martin. As to the sole acknowledged strikebreaker fatality at Ludlow:

However, modern historians assert that only one of the militia's number, a private named Martin of the National Guard, was killed. Martin was fatally shot in the neck, presumably by strikers.

That’s too weird a coincidence, and I get the feeling one of Their plants got smoked during whatever shenanigans they were trying to pull off. Maybe his cover got blown and the miners took care of business. It was worse at Forbes, though. In a lesser, previous ass-kicking on October 17, 1913:

What with one thing and another, the camp was pockmarked with machine gun bullets, partially razed by fire, and Under sheriff Zeke Martin and Deputy C.W. Kennedy were dead, along with a mine guard and possibly others.

During the rampage, Superintendent Nichols hid in his house with his wife and children. Along with a couple of dead Martins and “possibly others”, this was all hitting too close to home for the Salem Witches, know what I mean?

Now, it’s a bit too much to sort out all these various corporate entities floating around, but the Ludlow wiki states that the strike was organized by workers for the Rocky Mountain Fuel Company. Recall that the Coalfield War began in the fall of 1913, then check this out:

Company President E.E. Shumway died in 1914 from injuries sustained while investigating the aftermath of the disastrous 1913 explosion that killed 37 miners at the Coryell Vulcan mine in Garfield County. David W. Brown (1860-1922), who joined RM Fuel in about 1900, succeeded Shumway.

I can’t find any genealogy for that guy and I understand that’s a common name, but Brown is indeed one of the Salem Witch families. There was Dave right outside the spotlight when Shumway “died suddenly and conveniently”. I feel like I’ve almost given up believing in coincidences.

Speaking of moles, looks like there was an even more obvious one in the Baldwin–Felts Detective Agency. I never had specific occasion to bring them up, but if you’ve looked through the links of this post and the preceding one, you will have seen that agency come up over and over. They were the primary armed thugs used by the capitalists, the Blackwater of the day.

We actually have a “mole+mole” situation, in that Baldwin-Felts employed a spy named Charles Everett Lively (1887-1962):

… who infiltrated the UMWA in West Virginia and other states, was tasked with spying on the miners in Colorado and killed a man, for which he pleaded self-defense.

It gets worse when you read this from his wiki:

His participation in three killings, with scant consequences, cemented his reputation as one of the most violent opponents of efforts to unionize the coal fields. He has been called "the deadliest man in the West Virginia-Colorado coal mine wars".

Wait—what Spooky group always seems to skate? I guess that brings up the question: was Lively a spy for an early 20th Century PMC who was actually a Salem Witch operative, monitoring and shaping events from the inside?

If you examine the genealogy for Charles Everett Lively, you will find that his mother was born Ameretta Ann Parsons and his wife was born Ollie Mae Hale. Their genealogies dry up real quick, but you may wish to refer to Mary Bliss Parsons (1628-1712), “The Witch of Northampton” who also ultimately traces to Jack Parsons, and John Hale (1636-1700), "one of the most prominent and influential ministers associated with the witch trials".

Bonus regarding a certain family herein mentioned: Do you remember the name of the guy flogging the “true story” of MH370, which was that UFO orbs had teleported the airplane out of our dimension or something? Imagine how unexpected this was:

Professor Dave Explains | Ashton Forbes Is a Grifting Fraud (YouTube 6/12/2025 1:02:15)

Professor Dave Explains | The Very Expected Meltdown of Ashton Forbes (YouTube 6/24/2025 54:51)

Not that I’m suggesting you waste your time on anything to do with any of this but if you insist, pay special attention to the parts where Forbes is on cam, or just look up a video of one of his presentations.

Not to put ideas in your head, but this guy 100% believes what he’s saying. In this sense, he’s not lying as one would conventionally conceptualize. You will find no stress and no “tells”. That’s a psychopath for you.

It turns out that these generational Satanists use SRA functionally to prevent children from ever progressing beyond the state where young children have “an unclear sense of difference between fact and fiction”. That’s what mainstream scientists would say. They argue about the age but it’s about seven.

I would put a finer point on it which would apply to both young children and these psychopathic generational Satanists: it’s not that they cannot discern fact from fiction, it’s that they place no abstract value on it and therefore may simply refrain from doing so if that is to their advantage.

Then again, maybe it’s just complete coincidence that we find Ashton Forbes heavily promoted while spewing this utter horseshit for no discernable benefit and with no discernable compunction.

Well, the elephant in the room is a singularly prominent American family associated with Ludlow among many other things. That’s coming next. Thanks for reading this one!

TL;DR: We examine whether the Robinson family are among the Salem Witches. We then try to explain the Tyler situation in light of that. The bonus includes a surprise cameo by good old Stephen Paddock (of the Salem Witch Paddocks). Of all the angles to Tyler Robinson you may have heard so far—and the shills are certainly pumping them out—I will offer for consideration some ideas you will not have heard anywhere else.

The name “Robinson” has come up a few times in my research but I’ve never written up anything formal about them. That name is not terribly distinctive, nor has it yet come up for any central players. We have another instance to add to the pile, so I shall strike while the iron is hot.

As presented to us, Tyler is an enigma wrapped in conflicting narratives. Can you think of someone you know who is an enigma wrapped in conflicting narratives? No, because that’s not how normal people are. So Tyler is not normal and we just have to figure out how he came to be so not normal.

The foundational question is, of course, were there any Robinsons involved with the Salem Witch Trials? You bet! Four, to be precise: Deane, John, Joseph, and Phoebe. You’ll find links to the records for those names here:

Salem Name Search - "R". (University of Virginia | Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive and Transcription Project)

Interestingly, none of them are included anywhere in the list of people of the Salem witch trials. That either tells us something about the reliability of wiki, something about the reliability of historians at documenting events with solid historical records even given 333 years to do so, or perhaps that something is still being covered up after 333 years.

Are there other suspicious Robinsons? We’re not going to do the formal genealogy work but I just wanted to bring them to mind so you think, “Oh, okay, maybe these were not just random people out of nowhere that got swept up in this.” That perspective alone can be enough to alter your calculus as to how this is all fitting together.

For example, you might be thinking that those Robinsons at the Salem Witch Trials were somehow just unwitting bystanders caught up in the fakery. I think some people were, actually, but how about them? Well, I’ve written about the suspicious group that arrived in America on the Mayflower. That ship carried the could-not-be-more-innocuous-with-their-hat-buckles “Pilgrim Fathers”. Who was their pastor? John Robinson (1576-1625). And who was he buddies with? Robert Parker (1565-1614). Certain members of that family could not be less innocuous.

Did they stay connected? Of course! A fun connection I located was not born until almost 70 years after the fake witch trials: Abijah Coffin (1760-1793). For a bit of context, I have not written about them much yet but I was under the impression that the Coffins were the most prominent Spook Elite family until I discovered the Parkers.

Abijah’s wife was Elizabeth Robinson (1771-1850). Her mother was Priscilla Paddack (1722-1803). If you’re thinking, “Hahaha, like Stephen Paddock of the fake Vegas shooting?”, yes, that’s them. Priscilla’s mother was Ann Bunker (1686-1767). If you’re thinking, “Hahaha, like the Battle of Bunker Hill?”, yes, that’s them, both the hill and the battle. Ann’s mother was Mary Macy (1648-1729). If you’re thinking, “Hahaha, like the department store?”, yes, that’s them. (Sometimes I come across things like this and feel that even well-experienced conspiracy theorists really have no idea the scope and scale of what we’re up against. I know I didn’t.)

How about the modern day? Well, you know that wild conspiracy theory that Barbara Bush’s real dad is Aleister Crowley. I’ve suggested that may be a misdirection even if it’s true, and that what’s important is that her acknowledged father is Marvin Pierce of the very powerful Pierce family. His wife, who was Barbara’s mother and perhaps Crowley’s occult sex slave or whatever, was born Pauline Robinson.

How about scumbags we still have to read about in the damn papers? Well, everyone talks about Bathhouse Barry’s origins, but how about his husband? Recall that Big Mike was born (with a penis) as Michael LaVaughan Robinson. I get that he’s blacker than the ace of spades, but also recall that the woodpiles stretch over many centuries. Think it’s just a coincidence?

Now that I’ve got us all worked up to a proper level of suspicion, WTF is the deal with Tyler Robinson? Why all the weird shit about this nobody from nowhere? It’s not normal, and I claim that’s because Tyler is not normal. Rather, I surmise that he’s a generational Satanist, and that he and certain others around him are doing exactly what they are told. What you are told to do does not need to make sense, as I’m sure you heard many times from your parents.

Did Tyler snipe Kirk? It’s a separate analysis but… no. Actually, you can keep believing what you believe about the event right now and consider all the rest of this mere unrelated coincidence. As I mentioned, though, just being aware of certain things changes your worldview and analysis.

Tyler is a patsy, but of a certain form. He goes around saying and doing all kinds of suspicious shit. The pastor that contacted the cops on behalf of the father says the son implied or told his father he did it. Tyler says he’s innocent but is not cooperating with investigators. His own mother shows off pictures of him with guns and says he fired them often. They were all supposed to be Trump supporters, including Tyler. His grandmother says he was quiet, shy, not political, and never liked or owned guns. His roommate/tranny lover is cooperating with the FBI, but Tyler had expected xer to retrieve his murder weaspon in the woods. I mean, can we sort out this shitshow?

Looks to me like Tyler and his parents are “in on it” as generational Satanists. They’re playing the roles they’ve been assigned, making him look as suspicious as possible. Grandma is not, and so she’s bewildered by the whole thing. Note that she married into the Robinson family and is not bloodline. The tranny/roomie is compartmentalized out of all of this, and cooperates because s/he has nothing to reveal.

All we’re ever supposed to do is argue about Tyler. He’s not at risk of being convicted because he didn’t do it. There’s probably some courtroom-door-busting alibi if they really need it. Nor was Charlie shot with that phony planted rifle, decorated with bullshit so we can argue about that too. The real gun and the real gunner are long gone.

Now, does the FBI know this, or at least Kash and Dan of the FBI? How about Trump? I’d say most probably they do, at least the part about Tyler not being the shooter. Remember when Dan told us he had been “shocked to his core”? Well these kinds of scenarios are pretty shocking, even to me, even still.

But mostly what they are is flatly unbelievable to the overwhelming majority of the general public. If you’re wondering why Kash and Dan and Don don’t say any of this, well, what do you think the fucking point would be? What is to be gained from it? The benefit would be exactly the same as if you told it to all the normies you know, friends and family and coworkers: none at all. I wonder if even a majority of the people who find their way to reading these words really believe any of it? No, I really do wonder.

If you’ve stuck with me this far, and actually give credence to it and consider it possible, don’t you think it would be an outrageous coincidence if Tyler was just some rando dude named Robinson who did not like Charlie Kirk and killed him dead with one shot? That seems… pretty unlikely.

Big question: why would the Salem Witches want to unalive Charlie Kirk? Beats me, TBH. Greg Carlwood of THC once observed that you can either have a platform or a message, but you can’t have both. Charlie had a platform, that’s for sure. He certainly delivered his conservative message long enough, so that was not the problem.

Was it that he had started calling out the Zionists? Well, people with way bigger platforms than Kirk have been saying that and far more for quite a while. So who knows? Maybe the wrong person overheard him saying, “So I was reading some stuff on a tiny website, some crazy shit about the people who were at the Salem Witch Trials of all things, and how their Satanist families were involved in all kinds of historical events, and….”

Bonus (or maybe part of the case): There is a social media campaign over this event like nothing I’ve ever seen for any other. There are thirty-three copies of every ridiculous “theory” over at r/conspiracy, each one stupider than the last. When I first saw it, I thought this post was just another one of them, or perhaps just a big mistake:

Why are we not talking about the plane that took off shortly after the shooting of Charlie Kirk? (r/conspiracy 9/14/2025)

To bring everyone up to speed, there was a suspicious plane departure from a nearby airport about an hour after the shooting. Personally, yes, I think the assassin(s) were on it but that’s beside the point. You’ll see the post associates that plane with Stephen Paddock.

First off, as a commenter notes, the plane that took off was a jet with tail number N888KG, but the plane associated with Paddock was the single-prop N5343M. Then someone else notes, “Coincidentally, Stephen Paddock lived in Mesquite, Nevada; only 35 miles away from St. George, where Tyler Robinson is from.” Um, is it coincidence?

You see, when I looked on a map to confirm this, I noticed that right next to Mesquite is the smaller-population-than-my-high-school Bunkerville, Nevada. BTW, that’s also the site of the famous Bundy ranch standoff. It was named after Edward Bunker, a noted Mormon pioneer. You’ll see in his wiki that he was inspired by reading a book by Parley Parker Pratt Sr..

Now hold up—didn’t we just see a Robinson, a Paddock, and a Bunker all in a line, and in the same passage where I mentioned the Coffins were second only to the Parkers? Maybe I’m just the best pure coincidence finder on the planet.

Double bonus: Tyler was living with his family in tiny Washington, Utah. It was originally settled by a subgroup of 28 families from a larger group sent forth by the LDS. Doesn’t that already give you a weird vibe?

Washington is part of the larger agglomeration of St. George, Utah, where other families of the Mormon “cotton mission” settled. Wiki provides the names of 23 neighborhoods and only two seem like they might be named after people. One is “Atkinville”, although the surname is always “Atkins” or “Adkins”. The other is “Price City”. I refer you to Anne Wood Price Bradstreet (1650-1707), one of the accused witches during the you know what.

Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: This is a long post split into two parts. Part one is a necessary background on some aspects of generational Satanism. Part two is where we put that understanding to work analyzing what’s going on with this Tyler Robinson character that has suddenly been shoved in our faces.

This is a lot of background material which is never discussed. If you read part two without reading this, you may start shaking your head wondering where I get off making certain claims. If you wish to see it as my eyes do, buckle in for a long trip….

The Salem Witches are generational Satanists. They’ve been at it in America for well over four centuries, and I believe it stretches back to the Old World for centuries before that. Point is, they are more organized and more dead fucking serious than Elite Satanists are ever portrayed in fiction.

In fact, such portrayals are part of the disinformation. They show us sex rituals and torture and murder and candles and cannibalism and old grimoires. That’s what you are focused on. Eyes Wide Shut is firmly established in conspiracy canon as the model of Elite Satanism. Kubrick is celebrated for his revelations, and endlessly analyzed.

Whether or not They do all that EWS shit is, I posit, immaterial. Analysis of it is irrelevant. Maybe all that shit goes on, but telling you about it is misdirection. You consider it vital, rather than directing attention to questions like, “Exactly how are they organized? What are their SOPs? Can we detect and analyze their operations?” FFS, it’s like when people think they understand what WW2 was about by discussing the occult aspects of the flair on Nazi uniforms.

One aspect is all intrigue and horror and titillation and moral superiority. It’s everything exciting that They know people love, and that those same people will excuse their addictive amusements as “research”. The counterpart is intelligence gathering and dispassionate analysis. It’s work. Let’s do the other for a bit.

Since these families arrived in America 400 years ago, they have surely spawned many thousands of direct descendants bearing their names. They are so proud of these bloodlines that they won’t even change their names to disguise their activities. Actually, I believe it may be a rule handed down by “The Chief Commander” that Bob Dylan mentioned.

So first, when we come across one of those names, we should never take it lightly or dismiss it as mere coincidence. Look at your high school yearbook and see how many Salem Witch names there are. As common as some of those names may be, there are so many different names in America that no names are really common.

Does that mean that everyone with the name of a Salem Witch is “in on it”? No, of course not. There are several reasons for that which we will discuss presently. The world is indeed big and wide and these names are not—to my knowledge—exclusive to generational Satanists. But, again, if you have other reasons to be suspicious, always push at least a little further. That’s the situation we have with Tyler Robinson.

Now we begin some intel work. We can learn a lot from an incident now nearly forgotten. Seeing what the world has become since then, it’s shocking it ever came to pass. That, in itself, shows that “They” do not have perfect control and a perfect script, and we should make the best use of the imperfections. I believe this to have been a reliable account:

Winfrey Show Evokes Protests (The New York Times 5/6/1989)

Oprah had interviewed “Rachel”, a woman who had broken away from her generational Satanist family. The outrage focused on Judaism because Rachel had alleged that her Jewish family and other Jewish families had abused and murdered their own Jewish children. Really, I think the plan for recovery from the exposure was to simply focus on Judaism. Easiest thing in the world to trigger Jews over someone saying something bad about Jews.

But in my research, I have looked at hundreds of Salem Witches and I’ve found… one Jew and one suspected Jew. Sure, George Hodel, a Jew, murdered the Black Dahlia but he was just “part of the crew” and not central to the structure. The other guy was back in the 1400’s and it’s going to be a long time before I ever get around to finding out what he was up. Can’t even remember his name right now.

Rachel had only ever been exposed to other generational Satanist families that were Jewish. Don’t ask me why, but perhaps Jews are still insular even when they’re Satanists. Importantly, she only spoke about her personal acquaintances and did not come out and say that the two were correlated. Rachel had only certain limited experiences, and she did not make the mistake of going from seeing only white swans to concluding that all swans were white. We should not make that mistake either.

That segues into a key observation Mark Passio made from his own experience as a Satanist: they are from every religious background, every race, every ethnicity, every occupation, every social stratum. Rachel had said the same decades previously: “There’s, you know, doctors, lawyers, Indian chiefs involved in it.”

How are Satanists always depicted for us? Very rich weirdoes in spooky mansions. Many conspiracy theorists think that’s where They will be certainly be found and nowhere else. That preconception is naïve and should be forgotten.

Second, Rachel mentioned that her family had been involved in ritual sacrifice since the 1700’s. Now, that’s a pretty odd detail for a schizo to make up as part of their dark fantasy, isn’t it? Why not say it was from “ancient times”? Why include it at all?

That detail does, however, dovetail into the research we’ve seen on the Salem Witches, although careful scholarship pushes back the date to the late 1500’s. Or who knows, maybe they didn’t start in with the ritual sacrifice stuff until they got the important shit together. A century and a half is no big deal to these people and they pay attention to real business.

Third is a detail I just happened to catch in an old clip of that interview. Rachel said that her particular job was to keep track of who in the family was involved in the ritual sacrifices and who was not. Again, that’s an odd administrative detail to make up. It is also, however, a foundational concept in Intelligence work: “compartmentalization”.

I would say it’s somewhat more elaborate than Rachel knew, which would of course be the product of compartmentalization itself. SRA survivor Jay Parker knows about the torture and murder his family committed, but he appears to have no idea that his family has been involved in social engineering for literally centuries, about which I have written so extensively. Rachel never mentions any of these “extracurricular activities” either, nor anyone else I’ve yet heard who has experienced SRA.

That’s clearly the product of compartmentalization, the old “need to know”, and it’s important for every researcher to keep this in mind because these generational Satanists can put forward someone with bullshit stories about SRA to lead everyone off in the wrong direction with endless narratives. I’ve seen it time and again. However, if any of them ever starts off with, “Forget the robes and the torture, let me tell you what really went on with my family at the Battle of Bunker Hill,” well, you’ve probably got yourself a live one. Hasn’t happened yet.

I suppose we can boil it down to three rules of thumb for analyzing the actions of generational Satanists: (1) You’re in or you’re out and those who are in do as they’re told. (2) Compartmentalization exists even between close family members. (3) No one is fully briefed, except maybe Satan I guess. Now we can finally start talking about Tyler Robinson.

Thanks for reading and see you in the next part!

TL;DR: We confront one of two massacres which were practically the same, taking place a few miles from one another and only a week-and-a-half apart. They have been handled very differently by history. Discussion of that other (real) massacre will have to wait for another post. Those differences give us key insights into how “They” operate, and you can use those insights to efficiently unravel and understand other events both past and future.

Because the event has now become Conspiracy 201, it’s important in and of itself to know that one of the high-profile outrages of the Rockefellers known as the Ludlow Massacre was staged. We’re only going to review a fraction of the evidence. As to the rest, I’m going to recommend a documentary that does not declare it was staged, but I think you’ll be able to see that for yourself when you watch with a certain mindset.

It was a few years back when I researched the Ludlow Massacre and realized it was fake, or at least that it was supposed to be. Right after that, in what was probably an authentic coincidence, the talented and well-known (in conspiracy circles) filmmakers Aaron and Melissa Dykes published a short documentary on it:

Forgotten History: The Ludlow Massacre and the PR Machine (Truthstream Media 5/31/2022 42:21)

I thought it was very well done, except that it completely missed the underlying nature of the event. Not an ironic joke—I mean exactly that.

You see, at several points during the film, the narrator Melissa is perplexed at how and why certain things have happened. One example is that staged photographs were taken. There are pictures of the strikebreakers’ machine gun emplacement. Who would so document their upcoming massacre? Others show the militia behind cover during a firefight with the strikers, but taken from in front of them. She just cannot understand why they did these things.

Well, yes, that’s the crucial point: she thinks the events actually took place as we’ve been told. When you switch paradigms and understand that They will lie and deceive even about things which are apparently negative for Them, those baffling “facts” suddenly turn into evidence of the staging.

Near the end, Melissa is at a loss, perplexed that the fallout of it leaves the public seeing “Rocky” (John D. Rockefeller Jr.) as a hero. Outrageous! The paradigm shift, where you can put a black box around the internal machinery and look at what went in and what came out, helps us understand what was really going on.

A couple of important things went in. One was that the miners worked in terrible conditions, with very low pay, and in settlements completely controlled by the companies. Because of that and the rest of the plutocratic antics, the Rockefellers and their ilk were absolutely despised by the public. Something was bound to break against Them.

I have not yet had a chance to write it up, but the Salem Witches were behind the whole Progressive movement. When you consider all the Progressive insanity today, it should come as no surprise that They started it all Themselves well over a century ago. Maybe you’re slapping your forehead now.

The basic plan for these miners who might be “getting ideas”: precipitate a strike, run a psyop to shut it down apparently violently, then have Their controlled opposition come in and save the day with “organized labor”. Their assets were doing the organizing, of course, and I think anyone who has worked in an organized labor job can testify as to how little—even today—the organizers care about the membership.

It’ll take us a while to get there, but this false flag looks like it got out of control and the Rockefellers ended up looking terrible. Might as well turn lemons into lemonade: they brought in PR to make Junior look like the big savior of the big mess. Huge success!

Now look, I wasn’t there and I do not know who actually got killed, but what I would argue is that what actually happened was something other than “indiscriminate killing of striking miners”, which is exactly what we are sold. Might they have wasted some inconvenient people along the way and tossed them on the big “massacre” pile? Sure, but we’ll never know.

What we’ll do is look at the best documented murder of the Ludlow Massacre and find that it’s nonsense. Thus, you have little chance of firmly showing who else got killed, by who, and why. That case concerns a certain hero miner named Louis Tikas. He’s the literally iconic martyr of the event, brutally murdered in cold blood by pitiless Rockefeller goons, an idea which lasts right up until you actually begin to put his story together for yourself. There’s a monument to Ludlow featuring Tikas, enough to tell you the story we’re handed is phony.

Tikas was an immigrant from Crete and by 1910, after 24 years in the US, he was part owner of a Greek coffeehouse in (the very Spooky city of) Denver. By the end of 1912, just before all this Coalfield War shit started popping off, he was an organizer for the United Mine Workers of America and the main labor union organizer at the Ludlow camp during the strike.

No reason is given for the profound change in career, nor record of him being a miner. In between, he was—get this—a strikebreaker. In his wiki profile photo, you can see he’s wearing a suit and some kind of badge. I don’t think it’s because he was a fancy Jew, I think he was repping The Man. I mean, how loudly can you say “plant”?

Now, I used the word “staged” because that was what Ludlow was supposed to be, but a longer and more accurate term would have been, “a staged event that got out of control and we don’t know exactly what happened”. Pretty clumsy.

Various details of the massacre are scattered among different accounts, but let’s focus on a certain passage from the wiki of the on-scene commander of the Colorado National Guard, Major Patrick J. Hamrock. Because Tikas was a plant, he was meeting with his counterpart when the miners he had left unattended started acting on their own and shit came unglued:

At 8:50 AM, Hamrock met Tikas at the agreed location, whereupon Tikas informed the troops and distraught woman that the man in question was not in the Ludlow Colony.  Greek miners moving in a flanking fashion towards an arroyo were seen by National Guardsmen who were emplacing the second machine gun. Tikas rushed back to the camp, reportedly carrying a white handkerchief in an attempt to prevent a fight.  Hamrock also failed to reach his own lines before the gunfire began.  Who fired the first shot is unclear…. Hamrock would testify that he was among the first to man a machine gun, stating he had fired at points near the colony, rather than directly into it.

You can believe whatever you like about the events, but that neatly sums up my scenario, does it not? Most of the victims (maybe all, who knows) were killed by smoke inhalation when the camp somehow caught fire that evening. There’s nothing as chaotic and uncontrollable as fire when you’re trying to run a simple psyop.

Okay, abort mission. Tikas’ cover might have been blown by that point—who knows—but he needed to exfil. I contend faking his own martyrdom was the chosen method. It is the only death documented with any substance, and purportedly came at the hands of militia commander Lieutenant Karl Linderfelt.

In hazy and conflicting circumstances, Tikas comes into contact with Linderfelt, who breaks his rifle butt bashing in Tikas’ skull. Tikas is then shot three times—including in the back—and bleeds to death. Phony, or just hard to kill?. There are a couple of contemporaneous accounts of the murder of Tikas, so this is the best you’re going to get:

Eyewitness to Murder: Recounting the Ludlow Massacre

Two Bits for a Tragic Tale: Walter Fink’s The Ludlow Massacre

If you can take those accounts along with what is written in the wikis of Tikas, Hamrock, and Linderfelt and come up with a sensible and coherent narrative to present as the opening argument in the trial for the murder of Louis Tikas, then… well, you’re not going to but you’re welcome to try.

Just as we saw on January 6 with Ray Epps, a hallmark of assets working a staged event is that they escape all punishment. So what happened with Hamrock and Linderfelt? At least this, which is way more than happens today:

Hamrock was court-martialed for his actions at Ludlow on 13 May 1914. He was charged with murder, larceny, and other crimes associated with the death of Tikas and other unarmed strikers, as well as the twelve children and two women killed during the battle and militia-set fire that followed.

Linderfelt was court-martialed too. Both of them and everybody else completely skated on all charges, of course. This gem seemed particularly insulting:

While Linderfelt was found responsible for the deaths of Tikas and other strikers that exhibited execution-style injuries, he and all others were acquitted. Linderfelt admitted to striking Tikas with his Springfield rifle. The military court found Linderfelt guilty of the assault on Tikas, "but attach[ed] no criminality" to his actions.

Oh, see? We’re all free to do that stuff too. Seriously, though, that “execution-style injuries” thing? What I surmise is that anyone who wasn’t “going along with the program” or was otherwise inconvenient in some way just got disposed of and became a statistic in the “massacre”. We’ll never sort it out at this point.

Anyway, from here what I would suggest is this: Go watch that very well-made documentary with all the foregoing in mind, and keep trying to convince yourself those things really happened as we are told. That in itself is the shift in paradigm, since no one watches such documentaries with such doubts in their mind.

If you’re like me, you will find it much more plausible to conclude that no, they did not, and thus the Ludlow Massacre was staged and that Melissa and every other conspiracy theorist is trapped in a paradigm. If you cannot see these things as I’ve described, well, typing more words into a social media post is not going to change that.

Assuming you’re still on board, you’re in a third stage of understanding the Ludlow Massacre. The first stage—the normie stage—was that you’d never heard of it. That’s because it was a psyop. As a rule, once a psyop is complete They quit talking about it because there is nothing to be gained, there is only downside for exposure.

The second stage was when you heard about this “outrage” somewhere in the conspir-o-sphere. “OMG,” you thought, “those Rockefellers are buttholes. I knew it.” And that’s where the hook was set. As a rule, you cannot let your emotional reactions impel you towards any conclusions. It’s all too easy for you to revel in how ”right” you were all along. “They” know this fault in reasoning and They use it all the time.

See, you hated the Rockefellers before and then you found another reason to hate them in the Ludlow Massacre. In reality, you swallowed yet another lie that distorted your worldview, and it cost them nothing extra at all.

We finally arrive at the question, “Were these the doings of the Salem Witches?” I find I’m always asking that question these days. First, are the Rockefellers—who were behind Ludlow—connected to the Salem Witches? Well, that’s a long story which will have to wait for another post, but now I also feel I’ve given away the answer. In the meantime, I’ll give you other tasty morsels to chew on, directly related to Ludlow.

I did some brief research into the National Guard commander, General John Chase. I couldn’t get anywhere. I’ve picked up clues along the way that the Chases (think JP Morgan Chase & Co., $4 trillion total assets) are one of the Salem Witch families. The writeup on them will have to wait. In the meantime, stick that claim in your back pocket as you read up on John’s role in the Colorado Coalfield War:

He came under extensive criticism for ordering mass arrests and detentions of strikers and others who spoke publicly in favor of the strikers or who criticized the National Guard…. When the judge ordered the prisoners released, Chase refused to follow the order from the civil court until the Governor of Colorado directed him to do so. Chase was court-martialed for his actions, but Colorado Governor James H. Peabody restored him to the command of the National Guard.

Who acts like that and then skates? Salem Witches do, right? Next, starting early in the documentary, Aaron and Melissa spend quite a long time castigating a guy that the Rockefellers kept on the payroll for nearly 50 years as the chief surgeon of Colorado Fuel & Iron:

Dr. Richard Corwin and Colorado’s Changing Racial Divide (History Colorado 3/18/2021)

As the doc and that article tell us, he was a vile eugenicist. His full name was Richard Warren Corwin. I didn’t do the genealogy and I’ve never written up the families, but you may reference Mary Warren, "an accuser and later confessed witch… a servant for John and Elizabeth Proctor", and Jonathan Corwin, "merchant, politician, and magistrate, best known as one of the judges involved in the Salem witch trials of 1692".

Late in the film, starting about the 30 minute mark, discussion begins on the “PR Machine” referenced in the title, which comes in the form of Ivy Ledbetter Lee (1877-1934). Even though it’s quite clear that Aaron and Melissa have done a tremendous amount of detailed research, they never mention that Ivy was working in the context of the firm he co-founded, Parker and Lee.

That was only the third ever public relations agency to be established in the United States. Now, maybe you’re thinking it was all on the up and up and his partner, George F. Parker, was just some guy. Maybe! But then again:

The firm came under fire during WWII because it had done consulting work for German industrial giant IG Farben.

Nuff said? We cover the other massacre next. Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: The role of the Nichols family in the Salem Witch Trials has been obscured, and similarly their genealogy has been scrambled. Tracing it as far as we can leads to some strange revelations. The bonus will be evidence that “They” are reading these posts about “Them”. Spicy!

As deep as some of these trails lead us, I’m actually a person that like likes to keep things simple. A large part of this research—as bizarre as some of the material has turned out to be—is just trying to straighten out the information we’ve been handed in the public record. After I lay it out in the daylight, you may of course do with it as you please.

I had already located the Salem Witches at the Ludlow Massacre (which was fake and I was technically looking at another massacre at the same place and time that doesn’t even have a name, but that’s all for the next post), when I came across the names “Nichols” and “Martin”. I had previously touched only on Nichols and only circumstantially, but that brief contact had included some provocative associations.

“And here it is again,” I thought. “I need to get this straightened out and make a quick determination as to whether the Nichols family was or was not involved in the Salem Witch Trials.” Famous last words, at least in regards to the “quick” part. The incidental contact with “Nichols” came here:

Dr. Joseph P. Farrell: a disinformation agent with unlikely connections to the Montauk Project, DB Cooper, and the Salem Witch Trials (conspiracies.win 5/29/2025)

To save you the reading, (1) In genealogy records for the peerage, I found names similar to JPF’s in association with the names “Preston” and “Nichols”, (2) I speculated that’s where they came up with the fake name for the guy that handed us the Montauk Project fanfic, and (3) three of the six case agents for the NORJAK investigation of the DB Cooper/Salem Witch joint were named Carr, Farrell and Nichols.

That was as far as I went at the time, and I would readily admit it could all have been coincidental. Time to get off the fence! Right to the horse’s mouth on the Internet, the University of Virginia | Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive and Transcription Project:

Case files referencing Thomas Nichols (“22 yeares”)

Case files referencing Lydia Nichols (“about 17”)

Case files referencing Elizabeth Nichols (“about 12”)

Each of those testimonial records is short and to the point. I mean, they’re utter bullshit accusations of witchery but it’s quite clear what phony claims they’re making. It further seems obvious these were the children of a man named Thomas Nichols Sr. (1635-1696) of Amesbury, Massachusetts. That’s less than twenty miles up I-95 from modern-day Danversport, known as Salem Village at the time of the trials.

Okay then, “answer = yes”, the Nichols family was directly involved in the Salem Witch Trials. Simple and straightforward, just like I like. And that’s where it all starts to spin out of control.

If you check Wikipedia’s list of people of the Salem witch trials, there are no Nichols listed. And as you’ll see in a moment, none of the Geni pages for any of these Nichols note their involvement in the Salem Witch Trials. I get that their involvement was minor but that’s not the issue.

I feel comfortable claiming that that anyone who reads those Wiki or Geni pages would subconsciously assume that if these people were involved in such an incredibly high-profile event, such participation would at least be noted. We have to ask the question: are all the “experts” that put such documents together just shitty at their jobs, or were these intentional omissions?

Let’s examine first the simplest case, that of Lydia Nichols. As you can see, that record is virtually empty. Being “about 17” in 1692, she would have been born around 1675. Geni lists her “Birthdate: estimated between 1651 and 1689”. Not untrue, but a horrible estimate.

Next least weird is the case of Thomas Nichols (1670-1724). That record looks fairly normal on the surface, with some questionable things said in the voluminous “About Thomas Nichols” section. I won’t question any of them except one: “Mother Mary Moulton1 b. c 1642”. Moulton? We know that name, don’t we?

Eye of newt and mutilated cow: Linda Moulton-Howe is descended from a witness at the (fake) Salem Witch Trials (conspiracies.win 11/21/2024)

Linda’s immediate genealogy is almost completely hidden, but I contended that it traced back to this participant in the Salem Witch Trials: Robert Moulton III (1644-1731). (FYI, I refer to him as “III” but these suffixes changed through an individual’s lifetime.) Interestingly, Robert Moulton isn’t on the wiki list either, just as with the Nichols, but his association with the trials is noted on his Geni page.

I found I could not with absolute certainty tie Linda to Robert. Nor can we make a lot of progress with the woman Geni records in a sparse record as Thomas’s mother: Mary Nichols (born circa 1642). It curiously notes: "Also Known As: Probably not Moulton". WTF? That’s like telling a cop, “I’m probably not the suspect.” There’s actually a lot about “Mary Moulton” in the text part of the page. Robert’s genealogy runs out in just one more generation so we won’t readily be able to search for a link to a “Mary”.

As the only candidate I would offer, you might want to consider whether his mother was this woman: Mary Friend (Moulton) (1644-1703). She was married in Salem and two of her daughters married Dodges, which is another Salem Witch Name I’ve never written up.

Also, note that her children were: Mary (1666), John (1668), James (1674), Sarah (1676), Esther (1678), Elizabeth (?). That leaves an odd gap during the time when Thomas was born in 1670. Just, uh… just saying.

What to make of any of this? Who knows, but it gets weirder with the other sibling Elizabeth, for whom the Geni record is: Ebenezar Tucker (Nichols) (1664-1735). She is aka “Elizabeth”, so this is her alright. Ebenezer is a guy’s name, though, and you’ll see “she herself” has a son named Ebenezer. Also, a 12-year-old in 1692 would have been born about 1680, so the given birth year of 1644 is way off. Who knows what’s going on with all this but I don’t think we quite have the truth.

It gets weirder from here but, okay, maybe at this point it sounds like a lot of hysteria about these three Nichols kids who were barely involved in the Salem Witch Trials. Therefore, I would like to stop and point out that there’s literally a historic landmark in Salem, built almost a century after the trials, named the Peirce–Nichols House (1782).

The Pierces are, I believe, incredibly important but I just haven’t gotten around to writing about them yet. You can see how painstaking all this is. As quick points of reference, though, remember that Barbara Bush was born Barbara Pierce, and that the founder of the Smithsonian was the bastard son of Hugh Percy. Spellings and pronunciations have altered greatly over the centuries but I trust you can get the feel of the variations.

While researching for the Joseph Farrell post, I came across a book that I didn’t include in that writeup because I thought it went too far out on a limb:

Witch's Breed: The Peirce-Nichols Family of Salem (Susan Farley Nichols Pulsifer 1967)

Captain Ichabod Nichols was born in 1749 at Salem, Massachusetts, the son of David and Hannah Gaskell Nichols. He was a descendant of Thomas Nichols, who was living at Amesbury, Massachusetts, by 1667, and of Sussanna Martin, who was executed for witchcraft in 1692.

It turns out I didn’t go too far out on a limb enough. The question stood: was the connection between Farrell and Nichols merely spurious? I was really reaching and I knew it. But did you notice the name of the author? Looks like Susan (like Martin, of all names) was a Nichols herself, had also descended from a family named Farley, and had married some dude named Pulsifer.

If you research the surname Farley, you find out:

The patronymic surname is an anglicised form... of the Irish patronym Ó Fearghail, which means "descendant of Fearghail"….

And as for the surname Farrell, you are told it is:

… an anglicised form of the Gaelic patronym Ó Fearghail.

They are variations of the same name. The author of that book on the Pierces and Nichols was herself a Nichols and a Farrell. Can you convince yourself this is all merely spurious? Me neither.

Now look back at that pull quote from the book: did you recall the name of the particular witch in question? Susannah Martin (née North) (1621-1692). She was the maternal grandmother of the wife of Thomas Nichols, Jane Nichols (Jameson) (1673-1721). And do you recall, way back at the beginning, the suspicious names I found at (near) the Ludlow Massacre? Nichols and Martin.

This isn’t the first time that particular witch has come up. In one of the most bizarre genealogical situations I’ve yet encountered, she had a family that was a weird analog for that of someone with whom you might be familiar:

There is a baffling mystical connection between the Salem Witch Trials and America’s sweetheart, John Cusack (conspiracies.win 11/22/2024)

All this adds up in my mind to the importance of the Nichols family being proportional to the lowness of their profile.

Bonus: Because I have to look for things that have been deliberately obscured, I’m used to being attuned to the smallest ripples on the surface of the water that might betray what is happening in the depths. We started here with my post which outed Joseph Farrell, which was on May 29, 2025.

You can read it to see that one of the big tells I identified was that he had supposedly spent decades as an academic studying Christianity, but that he hardly had anything to say about religion now that he was “a guy who writes weird books” (<- his own words, you can hear him say this incredibly unenthusiastically at the top of the following podcast). Less than a month later, what do we get?

#889: Hidden Civil War History & Attacks on the Orthodox Church w/ Joseph P. Farrell (Tin Foil Hat Podcast 6/26/2025)

Nine hundred episodes and he’s never been on the show before. When he is, it’s about how he’s all upset with these “deep state” attacks on Christianity. It’s basically Their only goal, don’t you know? Okay, Joe. The next day, we get:

Our cries have been heard!! (r/TinFoilHatPod 6/27/2025)

Whose cries are these? If you want this disinfo agent’s content, he’s got a weekly audio podcast, some kind of subscription video service, innumerable long-form interviews on YouTube, 41 or 42 books (he doesn’t know exactly, which you can hear at the top of the podcast), and all kinds of written content on his website.

Now, I’m a big fan of Sam Tripoli and no shade, but do you think fans of Joseph Farrell are also crying out for him to be interviewed by a dick-joke comic on his comedy/conspiracy podcast? Yeah, me neither, zero percent chance. If you look at that Reddit post, you can also try to believe it was ordinary fans of a dick-joke comic and his comedy/conspiracy podcast that downvoted the actual conspiracy I pointed out in a comment.

So are “They” are reading these posts? Well, They know who They are and this material is easy enough to find on a non-censored search engine. Why would They not monitor for such activity and take appropriate countermeasures? They’d be stupid not to and of all the claims I’ve made, none of them have ever been that They are stupid. Not as sophisticated as could possibly be, but not stupid. So… hi guise!

And to all, thanks for reading!

TL;DR: These things do not exist, even to the extent of a real photo of a fake mock-up. We’ll explore and figure out what’s really happening.

Being mildly interested in militaria, I was mildly curious as to exactly which missiles were being sold. Maybe offloading some old junkers? Nope, these are brand-new weapons known as Extended Range Attack Munitions (ERAM). They are so new, in fact, that they have not been built. Somehow, 3350 of them are supposed to be delivered to Ukraine by the end of 2025.

I would link you to the Wikipedia page for them but that doesn’t exist yet either. I would only note that they are not to be confused with either (1) the RIM-174 Standard ERAM (ERAM), which is an anti-(anti-ship missile) missile that costs $5m a pop so you better have a damn expensive boat, or the Extended Range Guided Munition (ERGM), which was a fancy-shmancy artillery shell of unknown cost a pop because it failed after $600m and 12 years.

Let’s start with the fact just mentioned, that even though artillery has been around for centuries, it took them all that money and all that time to figure out their latest twist wouldn’t work. With that in mind, consider this article:

Mini Anti-Ship Cruise Missile That Fits Inside An F-35 Is On The Navy’s Wish List (The War Zone 2/7/2024)

This was at the “wish” stage a year-and-a-half ago. It was for the trillion dollar fighter that cannot stop suffering peacetime losses. By July, though, one of the psychotic warmongering fantasists apparently got the bright idea this could “turn the tide” for the “defenders of freedom”:

Air Force’s Cheap And Fast To Produce Long-Range Missile Is Being Built For Ukraine (The War Zone 7/11/2024)

The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center’s (AFLCMC) Armament Directorate at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida quietly issued a request for proposals (RFP) regarding ERAM yesterday, which Aviation Week was among the first to spot. The RFP is a part of a larger rapid development contracting vehicle called the AFLCMC Armament Directorate Rapid Response (ADRR) Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO).

That was only a year ago. Did you see how long those names are and all those acronyms? How long do you think it takes that crew to go from RFP to kaboom? Thus, it seems it was just one more of the insane and ruinous initiatives of the “Biden” Administration. I also need to add the adjective “fantastical” because I want you to spot the trick here:

ERAM, which could have a range of up to 250 miles, would give the Ukrainian Air Force new capacity to strike targets beyond the reach of many of the weapons currently in its arsenal, including Western-supplied precision-guided bombs.

The ERAM magically changed from an anti-ship cruise missile to an air-to-ground strike missile. You see, in the world of fantasy, you can just change your mind like that and it is so. What this indicates, of course, is that the ERAM—as dumb an idea as could be—was at least legit in the normal legal and procedural sense. The bloodthirsty war pigs hijacked the program and said, “Now we gonna use this to kill all the Russkies! Slava Ukraini!” And either blood or money will flow soon:

Ukraine Will Receive First Of Thousands Of New U.S. Made Standoff Missiles In The Coming Weeks (The War Zone 8/25/2025)

The weapons, which have a range between 150-280 miles and are stated to be air-launched, at least initially, should start to arrive in around six weeks.

I’m still waiting for some cocktail onions I ordered off Amazon three weeks ago. Should have ordered the cocktail missiles instead. I thought this nugget was also darkly and unintentionally humorous:

Another key aspect of the original RFI was the requirement that 1,000 examples of the new missile could be built within two years, for an average production output of around 42 per month.

That should do it. You know, maybe. Turns out the Russians have already been using a more primitive analog to the ERAM called the “FAB”, which comes in several sizes up to ginormous. They took some of the countless old bombs from the Soviet arsenals and added a cheap set of wings and a nav package. If you aren’t familiar with these weapons, you should be:

Blood and dust: The rise of Russia’s glide bombs (European Security & Defence 7/15/2025)

By March 2024, Russia had deployed 3,500 glide bombs against Ukrainian positions, reaching a peak of 250 in two days against Avdiivka, and an average of 100 per day through September.

Drongo was driving an armoured vehicle down a makeshift road when a guided bomb landed nearby in 2024…. “You can feel your organs shaking around inside you…I started bleeding from my ears and nose. Vomiting. I was really struggling to speak for two days from the concussion,”….

Glide bombs weighing 500 kg or 1,500 kg are used most often, and carry enough explosive material to make a crater 15 m across. Some larger bombs weigh 3,000 kg with at least 1,000 kg of high explosives, and can level a building with a single strike.

Okay then, what’s really going on? First, I have no doubt Trump clearly knows everything I have just written and much more. It would appear then, he is only trying to lift nearly a billion bucks off the EU warmongers for 3,350 things that do not and will not exist for a long, long time as in never.

This fits right in to the overall strategy, as I see it, aimed not just at bringing the SMO to a close but at bringing the relentless hostility of the Eurocrat warmongers to an end, and hopefully getting them all thrown into the dustbin of history.

The idea is to make all this warmongering so costly—primarily financially—that they will give it up voluntarily, or their people will force them to, or those countries will become so weak economically that they no longer pose a meaningful threat. Significant progress is being made with the last two.

The key to success is that all of it is in the guise of warmongering itself, this ERAM boondoggle being a perfect example. Thus, it becomes difficult for these scumbags to object to it. “Hey, you bitch-ass Eurotrash! You’re gonna buy these missiles, okay? Or do you maybe like seeing these poor Ukies getting smoked, you assholes?”

PS: Okay, I get that the MSM and all their experts are too dumb and ignorant to get all of this, but what about the sources I linked? They know a hell of a lot more about this stuff than I do. Total nerds, they follow it every day, and—personally—I don’t see much bias beyond a hint of patriotism. How can they not see this just as I do?

Well, I’ve noted it before and it has to do with paradigm. They subconsciously “know” it all makes sense, so they make it make sense or ignore what does not make sense. Nothing is hidden from them—you can see I’m literally getting the information from them—but they have the telescope turned the wrong way and it’s hard for them to make things out clearly.

As for me, if something strikes me as nonsensical then I check it out. Often, as here, I find nonsense and then I have to work to figure out what’s really going on.

Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: We expose the Forbes family, including their activities and connections to the Salem Witches. The connection is not the usual run, so try this one out even if it seems boring at first.

Some conspiracy theorists like to say they are “going down the rabbit hole” researching some idea, but that’s typically the opposite of what’s going on. Rather, they are crawling their way out of Plato’s Cave. Most often, the sunlight becomes so blinding they turn back. The Salem Witches are standing around the mouth of the cave laughing, so let’s go outside and say hello. We had to begin with the slime in the furthest dank corner of Plato’s Cave:

John Kerry, we hardly knew ya: Salem Witches, the Vietnam reverse-o, opium, and aliens in Antarctica (conspiracies.win 8/15/2025)

My point isn’t to slam Kerry, but to highlight that since we have a prominent character on the world stage, we know that we are as far from the action as we can get. Now we can begin to work our way back up the cave towards the light.

You see, John Kerry’s political speeches and policies and all the rest of that are—to my way of thinking—essentially meaningless. He’s just a puppet and a spokesman for larger forces, and in this case that would be the Forbes family.

Thinking back, I can’t recall any conspiracy theorists discussing this subject when Kerry was running for President or when he was Secretary of State, so that in itself tells you something about the state of conspiracy theory, does it not? This is where we touched on his family before:

The Salem Witches: Official Opium Sponsors of the Chinese Empire (plus another Parker) (conspiracies.win 8/8/2025)

I greatly underestimated the role of the Forbes—even just involving opium—so we need to take a closer look. There, I mentioned only that Francis Blackwell Forbes (1839-1908) worked with Warren Delno Jr. for Russell and Company running the opium trade, and that outfit was a successor to Perkins and Company. Much more to say.

The first thing to say is that I didn’t link you to a wiki page for Perkins and Company because no wiki page exists. We should stop to note that. Apparently, they are to be stricken from the record. This is how the Memory Hole really works: not so crude as a chute to the incinerator, just history that goes from “no one has ever heard of it” to ”doesn’t come up in Google so it does not exist”. But a bit still exists about Perkins and Company, such as in this book:

America's First Adventure in China: Trade, Treaties, Opium, and Salvation (John R. Haddad 2013)

Parker and Forbes made themselves useful on the Niantic. When the captain and half the crew fell seriously ill early in the voyage, Parker treated the sick while Forbes, an experienced captain, took the helm.

C’mon folks, yet another Parker, halfway around the frigging world? Are we all getting the idea about these people at this point? Do you know how wiki describes all this?

The Boston trading firm Perkins & Company sent many young men of their extended family to participate in their business activities abroad. Ralph Forbes being married to Margaret Perkins, their children were encouraged in the business.

That’s like saying:

The Mexican cartels sent many young men of their extended families to participate in non-traditional occupations including agriculture and entrepreneurialism. Pablo Escobar Jr. being married to Margarita Chapo, their children were encouraged in the business.

If you look in the “Family tree” and “Associates” sections of the wiki, you can see all the intermarriage with the Perkinses. The same goes for all the various business ventures and organizations listed on their page. You can consider all of them tainted by the Salem Witches.

Speaking of the Salem Witches, though, you may be wishing to see how they are connected to the Forbes. I’ll give you two levels of that. The first level is “mainstream conspiracy” and is nearly handed to us by wiki:

The Forbes family has a link to the Dudley–Winthrop family directly from Thomas Dudley (1576–1653), father of Anne Bradstreet (1612–1672), the first English-language female poet from America.

Well, what they leave out about Anne Bradstreet, as if it is literally unremarkable, is that she was the mother-in-law of Anne Wood Price Bradstreet (1650-1707):

Dudley Bradstreet was accused of witchcraft after he refused to issue warrants for accused witches. Anne and her husband fled the area to avoid arrest.

Also not to be missed is the Winthrop connection. That refers ultimately to the Winthrop Fleet of 1630, which got the whole Massachusetts Bay Colony kicked off.

The other connection to the Salem Witches runs deeper even than all this, and involves what I teased as the “hidden aristocracy”. This next section is going to sound like a ton of genealogical trivia until it all comes together, so bear with it for a minute.

You could start at the Geni link for John Forbes Kerry. His mother, Rosemary Isabel Kerry (1913-2002), is the Forbes connection, so go there.

Then it’s straight up the Forbes line until you hit aristocracy, starting with William Forbes, 5th of Newe (1640-1689). Four more generation back and you have Alexander Forbes, 1st of Newe (d1561). A couple of generations past that and we have Alexander Forbes, 2nd of Pitsligo (1428-1477).

At the start of this post, you might have thought, “Oh, I know, ‘Forbes’, like Forbes magazine, right?” In it’s heyday, that publication was run by Malcolm Forbes (1919-1990), very prominent in his time (think, IDK, Bill Maher famous), and he is of the Forbes family of publishers. They declare:

This article is about the Forbes family associated with Forbes magazine. For information about the Forbes family related to US Secretary of State John Kerry, see Forbes family.

They don’t come out and say there’s no relation, do they? You just automatically conclude that “fact” and go on your way. Well, there’s a lot to sort out but that “fact” may not be a fact.

Let me throw a few supposedly unrelated items into the mix, and I say supposedly because apparently no one but me thinks they might be connected to all this: the Forbes baronets, particularly the Forbes baronets of Newe (1823), and Lord Forbes of the Peerage of Scotland, particularly Lord Forbes of Pitsligo.

Now, I’m not going to sort out every detail because any one of the numerous aristocracy nerds should have already done so, and the first thing I would point out there is that for some reason none of them ever have in literally centuries.

The overall point, though, is that is you take the names from John Kerry’s genealogy, you can find close matches in the Forbes baronets of Newe and the Lords Forbes of Pitsligo. The years are sometimes off a bit but someone else can sort that out. As for Malcolm Forbes, his genealogy is vaporized after a couple of generations, but it’s enough for me personally to see that the current holder of the title Lord Forbes is… another Malcolm Forbes.

So I’m claiming that Forbes baronets = Lords Forbes = Malcolm Forbes = all these other Forbes = John Forbes Kerry, and that all this has been hidden from us. You’re reading it here first, correct? You may be thinking all of this is a witch hunt and a huge reach, but I’m going to wrap it right back around to the Salem Witches. At the top of the wiki for the Baronets of Newe, you’ll see that most recent creation was:

… on 4 November 1823 for Charles Forbes, a merchant in Bombay, India. He was a Member of Parliament for Beverley and then Malmesbury.

Uh, a merchant named Forbes in India? Yeah, this scumbag was overseeing opium production for export to China. More interesting, though, is that he was the MP for the constituency of Beverley, based around the town of Beverley in Yorkshire, UK. Name sound familiar at all?

Beverly, Massachusetts was named after it, which is immediately north of Salem and east of Salem Village (modern-day Danversport). In fact, Beverly was part of Salem itself until 1668. Enough of a connection?

Further, I believe there’s a key observation to be made. You see, when they set up Essex MA, they replicated a bunch of the place names from Essex UK. In this New England—or so to speak—the new Beverly has pride of place in relation to Salem, but back in Regular England, Beverly is 125 miles from the edge of Essex. You have to think They attached some importance to Beverly, right?

They did it yet again with Beverly Hills, CA, naming it after the Beverly in MA. Mere coincidence? I don’t think so.

Directly north of Beverly Hills is Franklin Canyon. Laurel Canyon is the next one east, so Dave McGowan may have been off by one. Bathsheba Folger, primary witness at the Salem Witch Trials, was the maternal aunt of Benjamin Franklin. If at this point you really think all this is a reach, then let me really wrap it back around.

Now, Santa Monica Blvd connects Beverly Hills to Silver Lake, and just north and parallel to it is Franklin Avenue. That street came up as the location of the residence of the Black Dahlia murderer. It is even speculated that the ritualistic murder may have taken place there:

I plucked the Black Dahlia and found a coverup that began with a generational Satanist and continues to this day. We’ll discuss that coverup why it’s so important. (conspiracies.win 10/4/2024)

You’ll see that at that time I knew it was generational Satanists, but I had not yet connected them to the Salem Witches. Live and learn! In any case, in unpublished followups to that post, I covered what They may have been telling us in the film, Under the Silver Lake. (No, I’m not talking about that scene where the old guy claims he wrote all the popular songs, it was the other scene no one seems to talk about.)

Franklin Avenue leads to the Franklin Hills area, on the north side of Silver Lake. The road ends at the Shakespeare Bridge, although we’re never told why a town all about motion pictures has a bridge named after a playwright.

On the far side of the country, a block away from the Capitol and kitty-corner to the Supreme Court, is the Folger Shakespeare Library. Do you know what Ben Franklin’s mother’s maiden name was? She was Bathsheba’s sister so her birth name was Folger too, of course.

Bonus: On the Winthrop Fleet page, you’ll see mention of a guy named Thomas Mayhew. Go to his page and you’ll see he worked with a guy named Matthew Cradock. I think this is the original reference for the fake name “Thomas Matthew Crookes”.

Bonus #2: Also on the Winthrop Fleet page, you’ll read:

A complete list of passengers is maintained by The Winthrop Society, a hereditary organization of descendants of the Winthrop Fleet and later Great Migration ships that arrived before 1634.

As I have noted a number of times, the bulk of the generational Satanists arrived in 1635. Odd where the Winthrop Society cutoff came, isn’t it?

Bonus #3a: Major Theodore Woolsey Winthrop was one of the first Union officers killed in the Civil War. He was aide-de-camp to Major General Benjamin Franklin Butler.

Bonus #3b: Butler, Pennsylvania is named after General Richard Butler. I suspect he is a relative of Benjamin Franklin Butler. General Richard’s mother was a Parker.

What strange trips these are. Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: We discuss the former SoS who just will not go away, and all the connections you never heard come up in his long and stupid career as a stooge.

How did I get here? I was writing up a post about a very high-profile family that ended up way too long, so I went to carve out a certain high-profile event. That event was connected to an important no-profile event, which in turn seemed like it might be connected to the Forbes family. Quick check on them just to tie up loose ends and… I needed a whole post. Then that got too long and I had to split off just this one single dolt.

My point in saying all that is that you should really try to internalize how deep all this is and how long it’s been going on. Every day, as I browse the traffic on r/conspiracy, I just shake my head and lament, “How would I begin to explain any of this to any of these people? They are so distant and divorced from what’s really going on, yet so certain they’re on the cutting edge.” Depressing, really.

I’m not going to do the customary thing and make a case linking John Kerry to the Salem Witches. That’ll come in a subsequent post about the Forbes family anyway. In the meantime, what you’ll see is Salem Witches come up over and over to such extent that you would be stunned if John Kerry wasn’t one of them.

Let’s put what is generally known about John Kerry—in conspiracy theory circles at least—on the table, and you can reflect back at the end and see how trivial most all of it is: He’s not rich, that’s his wife Theresa Heinz’s ketchup money. He’s Skull and Bones and ran for President against fellow Bonesman George Bush Jr. and—scandalously!—both refused to talk about it under threat of taser. He put together the “Iran deal” while his daughter is married to an Iranian mullah. He went to Antarctica as a goof. He’s a pompous and annoying liberal globalist windbag dumdum.

Okay, the mullah thing isn’t even true, but there were hella shenanigans going on between the Obama Administration and Iran, with this treaty that no one could vote on or look at because they called it a “deal”, and which somehow ended up with pallets of Benjamins airdropped into Tehran or some such shadiness. By the end of this, though, you may come to see all the foregoing as playground hijinks, and that all of us who got wrapped up in it were far, far from the mark.

You know what? I was going to try to say something nice about John Kerry but it’s impossible. It literally begins Day Zero. Kerry is a Massachusetts guy, right? You think I’d blast him for being born near Salem but in a way it’s worse. Of all places, he was born in Aurora, Colorado, which is now subsumed into Denver. That is the Spookiest place in the US next to Salem itself.

I expect you’re familiar with Columbine, DIA, and the Batman shooting, but I wrote up some of the extremely sus associations of that place in this roundup and in posts on “Evergreen” and Trey Parker. Don’t go there unless you need to.

I also really wanted to say something nice about his service in Vietnam, but even that gets into extremely shady territory very quickly. Kerry was decorated with a Silver Star, a Bronze Star, three Purple Hearts and a Combat Action Robbin. Was it all bullshit for a “perfumed prince”? Well, he got “swiftboated” to Hell, that’s for sure, but that brings up a crucial point for examination.

By all evidence, Kerry is one of the Elites. Whatever did or did not happen in Vietnam, if “They” wanted Bush4Prez, why not just say, “Hey, Johnny Boy, you need to take a dive in the eighth. It’s all for the best and we’re gonna take care of you, okay?” Nope, monkey poop got flung left and right and everyone ended up stinky. Is that how you would have advised “Them” to play it? Of course not, it’s beyond crude.

The picture that forms of how “They” really operate is not with bribes or threats or texts with the day’s marching orders—it’s influence, even among members of Their own families. It turns out the “swiftboating” controversy is a prime example. You see, one of the sailors that served under Kerry and later turned on him was named Stephen Gardner. Even wiki admits how sketchy this guy’s testimony was:

He was not present on any of the occasions when Kerry earned his medals, including his Purple Hearts. Gardner appeared in two of the group's television advertisements. All other living members of Kerry's crew supported his presidential bid, and some frequently campaigned with him as his self-described "band of brothers". Kerry crew members have disputed some of SBVT's various allegations, calling them "totally false" (Drew Whitlow), "garbage" (Gene Thorson), and "a pack of lies" (Del Sandusky).

Why would Gardner turn on Kerry? I’ll tell you why. I claim Stephen traces to the Gardner whaling family:

The aged and eccentric farmer Giles Corey, charged with wizardry during the Salem witch trials in 1692, refused to plead to his indictment, and as a result was subjected to the terrible death by peine fort et dure, i.e. by being crushed to death under heavy rocks. Judge Samuel Sewell in his diary records that the judges, who did not wish to inflict this barbaric penalty, asked Corey's friend Captain Gardner of Nantucket to plead with him to stand his trial in the ordinary way. Captain Gardner used his best endeavours for two days, but Sewell records that it was "all in vain."

Cool story, bro, and I didn’t even have to work for that one, did I? And I won’t have to work for the next one, either. You see, I wanted to commend Kerry for being a war hero that turned into an anti-war activist as spokesman for Vietnam Veterans Against the War and became a prominent voice in the "Winter Soldier Investigation".

If you didn’t recognize where they got the phrase “winter soldier”, it comes from an inspirational essay titled The American Crisis by Founding Father Thomas Paine, who wrote one of the most famous passages of the American Revolution:

These are the times that try men's souls: The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman.

Attorney, activist, and author Mark Lane came up with the title of the event, and Kerry gave it voice before the Senate. All quite admirable, is it not, that these “winter soldiers” had finally come to know and to do true service for their country? Don’t answer until I explain.

Turns out that Mark Lane was one of the first and most prominent JFK assassination conspiracy theorists. It’s too much to explain now, of course, but he was an asset selling you multiple books full of intriguing and compelling conspiracy research that will get you nowhere. Jesus, you think “They” never thought of that? It has worked perfectly.

Oh, but do you suspect I’ve gone too far in my witch hunt by calling out Mark Lane as a mole from all the way back to the Election of ‘63? Well, all I can say is I’m not the only one who smelled a rat:

[Citizens Commission of Inquiry] staffers criticized Lane as being arrogant and sensationalistic, and said the book he was writing had "shoddy reporting in it." The CCI leaders refused to work with Lane further and gave the VVAW leaders a "Lane or us" ultimatum. VVAW did not want to lose the monetary support of Lane and Fonda, so the CCI split from the project. The following month, after caustic reviews of Lane's book by authors and a Vietnam expert, VVAW would also distance itself from Lane just one month before the event.

So Lane was paying for it. You want moles? That’s how you get moles. Even more provocatively, one of the founders of VVAW was Lewis “Skip” Delano. Unusual last name, isn’t it? Make you think of FDR? Forget him, we’ll go straight for the heart of the beast since it’s fresh in my mind.

I want you to note how small this Small Club really is. Recall that I started here by researching an extremely prominent family, one with no association to John Kerry, and several levels down we ended up here. Less than a week ago I wrote:

The Salem Witches: Official Opium Sponsors of the Chinese Empire (plus another Parker) (conspiracies.win 8/8/2025)

There, you find out that Warren Delano Jr. (1809-1898) was running the opium trade for Russell & Co. Know who his partner there was? Francis Blackwell Forbes (1839-1908). You also find out that the Russell of “& Co.” was the cousin of one of the founders of—you got it—Skull and Bones.

The shine of VVAW and the WSI is a bit tarnished now, isn’t it? The lesson of all this Vietnam material—which we should have known before we started—is that while you already knew that “They” started and ran the Vietnam War, they also ran the opposition to it as well.

Finally, as to the rest of Kerry’s political career, it’s all been well-discussed with the exception of one item that has never crystallized in my mind: the “Iran deal”. Now, there’s just no way it could be something positive for the world. It was put together by Obama, Hillary, and Kerry, after all. Then there’s this treasonous subterfuge of calling a treaty a “deal”. Didn’t see that coming, did you, US Constitution?

The whole thing was aimed at preventing Iran from getting the bomb. That would be the bomb the USIC says (or used to say) they don’t have and aren’t trying to get, and that the Iranians say they don’t want and don’t think anyone in the region should have. Nothing about it made sense. Trump threw it in the trash and all the usual scumbags went, “Reeeeee!”. I just never figured out exactly what bad thing was happening, and my only guess was that the money was to be channeled to support the Iranian Deep State.

I wanted to wind up with a couple of “deep” conspiracy items, one of them high-octane and the other nuclear-powered. You can consider them a sort of bonus, not integral to the above presentation.

First, something long out of the conversation that I wanted to bump. I never knew how it figured into anything else one way or the other, but perhaps you will:

Berto Jongman: Was John Kerry Shot in France? UPDATE 8 AP Kerry Alive With Photo (Phi Beta Iota 6/1/2015)

That’s the late Robert David Steele’s old site, although he didn’t write the article. Who knows what really happened and what it meant.

The second issue concerns some very unusual things Kerry has said and done:

U.S. Top Diplomat Kerry Flying To Antarctica During Presidential Vote (Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty 11/5/2016)

Kerry’s Wasteful South Pole Trip (American Enterprise Institute 12/5/2016)

WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM UPDATE: John Kerry Claims to Be Part of a “Select Group of Human Beings” (The Gateway Pundit 1/17/2023)

It’s pretty extraordinary, that we a select group of human beings because of whatever touched us at some point in our lives, are able to sit in a room and come together and actually talk about saving the planet. And it’s so almost extraterrestrial to think about quote saving the planet.

Alright, that’s some bizarre shit out of this joker, isn’t it? Well, when I started down this road of trying to figure out what was really going on in the world, I had to venture pretty far out there trying to iron out any contradictions in the worldview I was putting together. I had to see how the big pieces fit together, or at least determine that they did not not fit together.

One of the pieces I had gathered concerned the work of Rand Flem-Ath and his wife. They wrote several books around the thesis that the original, main site of Atlantis was in Antarctica, and had been buried under the ice following a crustal displacement event.

We’re out of room, so all I can say is that the crazy shit with Kerry, what the Salem Witches are up to, and the Flem-Ath’s research actually fits with what I’ve put together so far, as wild as that may sound. You can see how long it’s taking to document it, though.

Thanks for reading! More on the Forbes to follow….

TL;DR: We’ll pause and take a look back at recent work on how the Salem Witches were behind Skull and Bones and the Opium Wars, and realize that conspiracy theorists are just never, ever going to get there.

Advisory: Yes, another long post, but if you read to the end and agree with the conclusions, you may be able to save yourself a quite a bit of time going forward exercising the discernment to recognize and skip material that will not be immediately productive.

I often like to start with how I came to a subject in the first place, and it’s usually something I noticed by happenstance. Well, Skull and Bones was mentioned in the very old “Ring of Power” documentary I was watching and I thought, “Crazy, but I just wonder if the Salem Witches were involved?” Well, most things are easy to find if they are there to be found in the first place and you know how to look.

The products of that effort were the last couple of posts, exposing that secret society and that “well-documented violent event” (as YouTube’s Community Guidelines would call it) as just another couple of the numerous initiatives of the Salem Witches:

“Skull and Bones” is just another project of the Salem Witches (conspiracies.win 8/6/2025)

The Salem Witches: Official Opium Sponsors of the Chinese Empire (plus another Parker) (conspiracies.win 8/8/2025)

Of course, there has been a tremendous amount of research in conspiracy theory circles on these topics. If you aren’t familiar with Skull and Bones and able to name a few Bonesmen, you are not leaving Conspiracy 101 with a passing grade. Here is a bit of that research that I came across in the preparation of those two posts:

Hegelian Dialectic as a Strategy for Modern Globalization: A Deep Dive with Antony Sutton (Winter Watch 7/23/2025)

Secret Society Kingpins Influenced, Financed 20th Century Upheavals for the Benefit of the New Underworld Order (Winter Watch 8/4/2025)

I actually noticed those only by pure happenstance as I was doing the research. Coincidences do happen, I suppose. Those articles are largely based on the landmark book:

America's Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones (Antony C. Sutton 1986 335-pages)

Also, this magisterial tome (look at the page count!) turned up in a search:

The New Underworld Order (Christopher Story 2006 749-page PDF)

Now, don’t read all that material just yet. In fact, if you read to the end of this post, you may not be very interested in doing so at all, or no time soon anyway. But slow down! That’s not to disparage or discount Russ Winter’s writing, or that of Antony Sutton on whose work those articles are based, or Christopher Story’s tremendous effort. My point is that I clearly recognized my work is from a different paradigm than theirs. Cross through the invisible membrane between the two paradigms and you can no longer look back into the former and see it with the same eyes.

The realization hit me so starkly that I had to pass it on, which is what I’m doing here. The point of all of my research posts is to try to convey to you “what is really going on” as efficiently as possible. Whether you accept the thesis at all and—if so—where you go from there is entirely up to you. I couldn’t begin to guess.

The basic state of mind that I picture is something like, “Okay, if this was just more shenanigans that the Salem Witches have been up to over the centuries, I can forget any thesis that it was driven solely by money or power, or what the specific geopolitical situation was, and all the ins and out and what-have-yous. All of that is downstream from this very unseen, very powerful, very long-running force manipulating human society." Well, that’s how I think about it, anyway.

If I had to characterize the “mainstream conspiracy” paradigm—that of the Winter Watch articles and Sutton and Story’s books—is something like, “If we carefully study the details, we can generalize to what is really going on”. Fair enough and it applies to many situations, but the problem is that a given paradigm will never point you outside itself to a new paradigm, if that is indeed what is called for. It is, in fact, the inherent fault that makes a paradigm a paradigm.

The paradigm we’ve been discussing concerning the Salem Witches is something like, “Now that we’ve identified the Small Club, I wonder if they are behind this particular thing? If so, all else is downstream, just supporting details of their fuckery.”

So the one paradigm starts with the details of the rich and the powerful and seeks to discern the structure and patterns. But ask yourself, seriously, is anyone going to come up with the Salem Witches from that? None have so far, demonstrably. The sole example is from a disinfo agent who (IMHO) was most certainly handed the tip.

The other paradigm is totally outside that. “Rich and powerful” are just means to an end but bloodlines—even to the extent of preserving names—are paramount. They also stay just outside the spotlight, not secret yet always unseen, not who “everyone is talking about”. I have come to call them “The Salem Witches” but, as a rule, they have no organizations, no societies, no self-identifications. All such things are merely fronts and utilitarian. Just like the Cool Kids in school, They know who They are and that is all that is important.

You see, what hit me was that out of all that detailed and painstaking research I linked above, do you know how much I used? Zero. I didn’t link to any of it and I didn’t find out anything new for the posts from all that material. I barely read any of it. I just used searches and found out the intersection was extremely small.

Let me give you a concrete example: Russ Winter reproduces a list of 25 “Notable Bones Families” that Sutton previously compiled. Only four have come up—and very tangentially—in my research and writing. Bush: Sarah Bush was Abe Lincoln’s step-mother. Dodge: I compiled a lot of links about the Dodge family but I thought it would be so mundane (relatively speaking) to readers that I never posted about them. Bundy: Mathis wrote that serial killer Ted Bundy was one of them but I just noted that down for future reference and never found reason to include it. Taft: Oddly enough, you saw my first brief discussion of them only because a Taft was one of the Skull & Bones founders. That’s it.

For a second example, Russ relates:

As one analyst wrote in July 1996, Yale is the place “where three threads of American social history — espionage, drug smuggling and secret societies — intertwine into one.”

He never mentions the Russell family in either article, and you saw what I had to say about the Russells and Yale and drug smuggling in the posts. You’ll also saw what I had to say about the Tafts, whom he mentions only in passing. Story says very little bit about the Russells and almost nothing about the Tafts and the Perkinses.

Now, you might think of those as holes in the research—flaws or faults—but there is a certain reason for it, which is the mechanism of the paradigm. Metaphorically speaking, an incorrect paradigm causes you to use a funnel upside-down. Not that it’s impossible for the material to get through, it’s just that you get a lot of spillage. Orient the funnel the correct way—use the appropriate paradigm—and everything flows a lot easier to the appropriate destination.

The point is, the outer fringes of Sutton’s work were too far outside what I consider “the action” to bother even writing about. Sounds insulting, but what can I say? Well, what I will say is this: once you’ve concluded to your own satisfaction that it was the Salem Witches once again at work, you may consider just bookmarking the Winter Watch articles and Sutton and Story’s books as detailed references documenting the shenanigans the Salem Witches got up to in these specific cases.

Hope you found this meta-perspective enlightening, or at least a refreshing change of pace. Thanks for reading, and now back to the regular grind….

TL;DR: This is to document that the Salem Witches were running the American side of opium traffic into China in the 19th Century. I can also provide an indication that their counterparts were doing the same on the British side. Two bonuses: (1) how They have hidden a war—a real war, not metaphorical—more deadly than any until WW1/WW2, and (2) another Parker.

It used to be popular in conspiracy theory circles to document and discuss the great damage the War on Drugs had been doing for decades. I think it should be noted that wars are now declared only informally for PR purposes, not legal ones. With increasing frequency their beginnings and ends are not even noted.

It’s just that no one talks about the War on Drugs any more after “They” quietly dropped it. Quite evidently, the new strategy for domination was to legalize a few harmless drugs and massively import destructive ones, then act helpless to prevent the carnage. Such is the way the herd is managed.

Now that’s all pretty bad, but there is something which I think is worse. Whatever their views on it, almost everyone has heard of the War on Drugs but few are aware there had been a War for Drugs. I hope this isn’t news to anyone reading this, but if it is it proves my point.

I was not young at all when I first heard of the Opium Wars (1839-1860). The War on Drugs was well underway and I thought, “Jeez, you gotta be a real degenerate to be hooked on heroin these days, and opium is almost as bad. If they had to have a war over opium, at least they used the military for something positive for once.” It was quite some time before I learned quite how ignorant I was. However, I don’t think I was at all behind the curve and I think the curve is much lower now.

So yes, the Opium Wars were fought in order to sell opium into China, make tons of cash, and destroy the society. Take fentanyl today, multiply it by whatever factor, render the government powerless to stop it, add in a Chinese amphibious invasion or two, and maybe we start to get a sense for it. The Opium Wars were, in my judgment, far worse than the War on Drugs.

Now take all that chaos and hell and remember it was all being fuelled externally by these opium pushers. They would be like the Mexican cartels of the day if they were being openly promoted and supported by the Mexican government and military. So how would wiki characterize this?

Some American merchants entered the trade by smuggling opium from Turkey into China, including Warren Delano Jr. and Francis Blackwell Forbes; in American historiography this is sometimes referred to as the Old China Trade. By 1833, the Chinese opium trade soared to 30,000 chests, that is, 2,310 tonnes (5.1 million pounds).

Believe it or not, that is literally all they have to say about these monsters. We’re also deep into a certain kind of disinformation: not lies, but making use of the way we totally fool ourselves by subconsciously thinking, “If there was anything important and relevant, they would tell me.” No, They wouldn’t. We’ll come back to what They are avoiding telling you.

If you look at names of those two drug pushers above, you’re probably thinking, “Oh, Delano as in FDR, and Forbes as in John Forbes Kerry!” Correct. Those scumbags come from lines of scumbags before them. Now, while everything you dig up on these lowlifes may be true, they’re sending you off in a direction opposite to a more revealing one. That’s where we’re headed.

I came to this subject because I touched on it briefly in this recent post:

“Skull and Bones” is just another project of the Salem Witches (conspiracies.win 8/6/2025)

One of the founders had a cousin who was heavily involved in the opium trade. The association was enough for the point I was trying to make. But then, maybe I was too hasty and that association was just incidental, huh? I decided to flesh it out. Of course, it’s worse than I thought.

That founder of The Order was William Huntington Russell (1809-1885) and his cousin was Samuel Russell (1789-1862). In 1819, Samuel founded Russell & Company, which “specialised in trading tea, silk and opium and was eventually involved in the shipping trade”. FFS, talk about soft-pedaling something.

Okay, now let’s go back and look at the wiki pages for those two dirthole opium pushers. Who did Warren Delano Jr. work for? Russell & Company. Who did Francis Blackwell Forbes work for? Russell & Company. Well, well. The name Russell was kept off the Opium Wars page entirely.

There is another issue I wanted to investigate. In the Skull and Bones post, I quoted this from the Company’s wiki:

In the opening months of 1831, Russell & Company had successfully smuggled of 3,500 chests of Indian opium into China; equal to twenty percent of the total amount of opium imported into China in the whole of 1831 alone.

Okay, so Russell had 20%, but what were the shares of other American opium smugglers? Well, I looked around and as far as I can tell: zero. And here’s more stuff they’re trying to hide, which will lead us to You Know Who:

Russell & Company’s history in the opium trade was rooted in its precursor establishment as ‘Perkins & Co’, which was responsible for the organization and coordination of drug trading throughout parts of Europe and the Mediterranean, mainly including Turkey.

Yep, turns out they were worldwide, this “Perkins & Co.” that became “Russell & Co.”. But who were they? Wiki provides no links in the article. Never fear. They’re talking about this guy: Thomas Handasyd Perkins:

American merchant, slave trader, smuggler and philanthropist from a wealthy Boston Brahmin family. Starting with bequests from his grandfather and father-in-law, he amassed a huge fortune. As a young man, he traded slaves in Saint-Domingue, worked as a maritime fur trader trading furs from the American Northwest to China, and then turned to smuggling Turkish opium into China.

Now let me just short-circuit this because we all know where this is headed. Thomas traces to an ancestor named Edmund Perkins, II (1600-1650). He was from Warwickshire, England. One of the Salem Witches, fake convicted but later fake exonerated, was Mary Bradbury (1615-1700). She was born Mary Perkins in—wait for it—Warwickshire, England. What are the chances? Like, 100%, right?

The other big part of the opium trade involved the British East India Company, about which I do not yet have a lot to say. Nothing very specific, anyway, but the EIC involved Elizabeth I and there is a ton going on with her just outside the spotlight, as usual.

Let me give you a very quick example of what I’m filing away to write up in the future. It looks like her real father was a guy named Henry Percy, 6th Earl of Northumberland. Later, the 1st Duke of Northumberland was a guy named Hugh Percy. His bastard son was James Smithson, founder of the oh-so-sus Smithsonian. Hugh’s legitimate son, also Hugh, was commander of British forces in the area during the Battles of Lexington and Concord. Get the drift?

What about the Salem Witches, you ask? It seems that in America, they played around with the spelling of “Percy” a bit. Get this: there’s a place called “Peirce Farm at Witch Hill” where Mary Eastey was fake arrested. See how they don’t mention that in her wiki? Left the name Peirce out of it.

Remember good old Barbara Bush? She was born Barbara Pierce and comes from a line of powerful Pierces, perhaps even stretching back to Salem. So is her real dad Aleister Crowley? Who knows, probably, but the point is that They tell you these other very intriguing things so you never suspect there are connections the other way. See how it works?

Bonus: Here’s everything the Opium Wars wiki has to say about a certain event:

In 1853, northern China was convulsed by the Taiping Rebellion, which established its capital at Nanjing.

Wow, how boring. Never heard of the Taiping Rebellion, right? In the decade since I came across it, I’ve never heard it mentioned once. Well, it turns out:

It ranks as one of the bloodiest wars in human history, the bloodiest civil war, and the largest conflict of the 19th century, comparable to World War I in terms of deaths. Thirty million people fled the conquered regions to foreign settlements or other parts of China…. The most widely cited sources estimate the total number of deaths during the almost 14 years of the rebellion to be approximately 20 to 30 million civilians and soldiers. Most of the deaths were attributed to plague and famine. Some analysts have claimed that the death toll may have reached 100 million.

Seems like a hard thing to hide but They did a great job, didn’t They?

Bonus 2: Remember Warren Delano Jr.? He was plugged in, genealogically speaking:

Among his siblings were brothers Frederick Delano, Edward Delano and Franklin Hughes Delano, who was married to Laura Astor, a daughter of William Backhouse Astor Sr. and a sister of, among others, John Jacob Astor III and William Backhouse Astor Jr.

But right before that, they tell us something more provocative (to me, anyway):

After his mother's death in 1827, his father, who was involved in the New England sea trade, remarried to Elizabeth Adams, a widow of Captain Parker of the United States Navy.

Oh ho! Well, if you go the Geni page for his father, Capt. Warren Delano (1779-1866), you’ll find two records for his wife: Elizabeth Delano (Adams) (1792-1865) and the virtually empty Eliza Delano (Parker).

Point is, there’s another Parker in the woodpile and They’re trying to hide him.

Great thanks, as always, for reading!

TL;DR: Here we make the case that the tiny secret society, on which there has been much study and about which there has been much discussion, is simply another of the numerous projects of the Salem Witches.

The “Bonesmen” of Skull and Bones very quietly move pieces around the chessboard. It is, perhaps, the most elite of secret societies which are not quite secret. Don’t drone me, bro, but shouldn’t we ask, “Who moves the Bonesmen around the chessboard?”

You see, all the conspiracy theorizing about “The Brotherhood of Death” concerns their membership, their rituals, the symbology of “322”, and the various associations and doings the alumni. Well that’s neat and all—and this is nothing to dispense with any of that—but does it not strike closer to the heart of the matter to try to find out who created these people as Bonesmen in the first place? That’s what we’re here to do.

I’m often shocked at what They leave laying around, knowing how easily it could all have been vaporized. We aren’t quite that lucky here and part of our case will be circumstantial. Since the stakes are pretty high, I believe we should press forward with it. I think you may leave with a view something like, “Well, someone needs to prove this isn’t the correct conclusion, if that’s the case.”

We’re going to make two cases, in fact, one for each of the founders of Skull and Bones. We’ll make the second case in the style of somewhat lazy prosecutor, by raising suspicions and pointing out the associations of three different men, all named Russell. One was a co-founder of Skull and Bones, one was his ancestor, and one was a shady government dude hanging around the Salem Witch Trials.

Now, I get it, you can’t present this as evidence in court, but it would be pretty weird if what we were going to see was all mere happenstance. The first case is short and to the point, and thus somehow less satisfying. We set our scene nearly two centuries ago, in 1832, when Skull and Bones was founded….

One of the founders was Alphonso Taft (1810-1891). He was a member of the powerful Taft family. The connection to the Salem Witches is a gimme, because the mainstream considers it mere historical trivia. I think we realize this is not the case. Alphonso’s son was President William Howard Taft, and we are handed this:

Family Relationship of William Howard Taft (27th U.S. President) 6th Great-grandson to George Jacobs (Executed for Witchcraft, Salem 1692) (Famous Kin)

What do I always say about the Salem Witches being just outside the spotlight, eh? Yes, George Jacobs (Salem witch trials) was fake hanged for witchcraft, while his son, George Jr., was fake accused but fake got away. BTW, George Sr. was 83 when he fake died and who knows how long he lived, so please have some hesitancy before believing that line about how everyone used to die at 33 or whatever. Not true.

I also pause to note we found a US President just by-the-by. I did not recognize any of the surnames given in WHT’s lineage, so he’s way on the periphery. Given the way disinformation intended for conspiracy theory circles is constructed, the more familiar a name is as one of “Them”, the less important that person is. Not a rule but evidence of a function.

We now turn to the other founder of Skull and Bones, William Huntington Russell (1809-1885). I hope you are already aware that the society was founded and is based to this day at Yale University. We could almost stop there. Among the ten founders, we find: Andrew, Mather, Noyes, Pierpont, Russell, Webb, and Russell. Frickin-A, 70% Salem Witches from the jump! That is, assuming we finish the present case about the Russells.

Wiki begins with mention that William is “a descendant of several old New England families”. The only one I recognized was “Pierpont”. Actually, you’ll see the link wiki gives leads directly to James, and he was the Pierpont in the above list and leader of the Yale founders group. For context, “Pierpont” is the “P.” in J.P. Morgan. You see the kind of start we’re off to. Okay, now here is some sophisticated disinformation:

William's older cousin, Samuel Russell, founded the successful merchant trading firm Russell & Co. in 1823, but William was never associated with this firm.

Now why would they want to so explicitly dissociate William from Russell & Company? To throw us off a trail? Is this the trail?

By the late 1820’s, Russell & Company were the biggest supplier of Indian based trade Opium into China…. In the opening months of 1831, Russell & Company had successfully smuggled of 3,500 chests of Indian opium into China; equal to twenty percent of the total amount of opium imported into China in the whole of 1831 alone.

You could probably turn a few bucks doing that, huh? Before we move on, let me emphasize the point that these Salem Witches did not just operate in history books. In fact, they write history books. Here is additional sophisticated disinformation about Skull and Bones:

In a 1974 book [Yale: A History], Brooks Mather Kelley attributed the interest in Yale senior societies to the fact that underclassmen members of then freshman, sophomore, and junior class societies returned to campus the following years and could share information about society rituals, while graduating seniors were, with their knowledge of such, at least a step removed from campus life.

See, Skull & Bones and Scroll & Key are totally innocuous, right? I remind you that Cotton Mather was absolutely central in the Salem Witch Trials, eventually writing Wonders of the Invisible World, a defense of the trials. Everything old is new again.

Let’s move on to the Reverend Noadiah Russell (1659-1713). You can see this brings us to the era of the Salem Witch Trials themselves in 1692. The first note is that They subtly (yes, I give them credit for that) try to muddy the relationship between Noah and William. The terms they use are “progenitor” and “ancestor”.

The two are, in fact, g-g-grandfather and g-g-grandson, in a direct line: William Huntington <- Matthew Talcott <- Rev. Noadiah <- Rev. William H. <- Rev. Noadiah. No typos. I wanted to spell it out for what I think are obvious reasons.

If you wish, you can verify the relationship starting with William’s Geni page. Click on “Son of” a few times to get to Noah’s Geni page.

I would have told you to do that on WikiTree, but their genealogical links got crossed up, for what I think are obvious reasons. Anyway, it’s important to switch over to the elder Noah’s WikiTree page because it has important biographical information for him that Geni lacks.

First a quick side note off the main topic: I just finished a long series about the phony assassination of Abraham Lincoln. In fact, I just posted the final installment. The one right before that was:

On the hoaxed assassination of Abraham Lincoln: mainstream conspiracies, conspiratorial conspiracies, and Salem Witches (plus another Parker!) (7/29/2025).

Well imagine this coincidence: Noah married a woman born Mary Hamlin (1662 - 1743). I checked and, yes, she is a relative of Hannibal Hamlin. He was Abe’s Veep. She could be a lineal ancestor for all I know, but I haven’t confirmed that yet. Small World and Small Club.

On Noadiah’s WikiTree page, you might assume he was a Connecticut guy all his life, born in New Haven and died in Middletown. That a ways from Salem, well over a hundred miles as the crow flies. But, Noah went to Harvard in 1677 and then on to Ipswich in 1683, supposedly to teach. Well, you don’t even have to get on the freeway to get from Ipswich to Salem.

That brings us to the other side of this equation. On the list of people of the Salem witch trials, you’ll find a “James Russell” listed in one place only, under “Politicians, writers, and public figures”. Now, you might be asking why I didn’t provide you a link to the wiki page for James, and this is where it starts to get intriguing.

The link wiki gives is broken and only takes you to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Russell_(Massachusetts_colonist). Pretty specific page name, right? As in, written by a human at some point and not machine-generated. However, the page for James does not look like it ever existed to be later deleted, nor can I locate any archived version. Do not ask me what’s going on here, but you have to wonder why no historians or feminists or Wiccans ever seem to wonder what’s going on. James definitely existed, though, as documented in the:

Case files referencing James Russell (University of Virginia | Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive and Transcription Project)

By the way, it’s very difficult to find anything on James using a search engine in the normal way. I had to use Yandex just to dig up a paper called “Gender Roles and the Salem Witch Trials: Women’s Newfound Power in Salem, 1692”. Turned out not to be helpful.

James is formally styled in the records as “Esq'r of their Majes'ts Councill & Province of the Massachusets Bay in New England & Justice of Peace within the Same”, whatever that means. The thing is, the entire government of the colony was flipped over and reorganized in 1692. Surprise. We’re not here to deconstruct that, but suffice to say that James was some sort of “eminence grise” in the witch trials, an assistant to the new Deputy Governor Thomas Danforth. Just outside the spotlight and right on brand.

Here’s the question: is James related to these other Russells? And here’s where I swing for the fences: I think he might be Noadiah’s brother.

You see, James is—as we encounter not infrequently—a ghost. He has no wiki page, no genealogy. What I wrote above is most of what is known about him. We’ll never match him up directly through documentation.

Let me pitch you this, though: Noadiah’s father was William Russell, of New Haven (1612-1664). He had four children in total: Samuel, Anna, John, and Noadiah. If you check the genealogy pages for the other children, Noadiah and .Anna’s are typical while those for Samuel and John are virtually empty and total dead ends. Sus, eh? Now, is it crazy to imagine that (drum roll) John simply walked away from his life, moved to the Salem area, and started going by “James”?

First, his age would be about right. John was born in 1653, which would make him about 40 at the time of the Salem Witch Trials. Noadiah arrived in Ipswich in 1683, so maybe John/James went with him. James would be over a hundred miles away from home, and hanging out in a town full of generational Satanists, so it doesn’t seem likely he would be casually outed. Everyone will have to decide for themselves, but this seems like nothing compared to today’s shenanigans.

How about a final push over the cliff to wrap this all up? William Russell of New Haven emigrated in 1638 from Over Compton in Dorset, UK. He had been preceded in 1635 by "Cornet" Joseph Parsons (1620-1683) of Beaminster, a town about 12 miles away.

Name sound familiar? “Cornet Joseph” was involved in fake witch trials decades before the exercise at Salem. He was also the progenitor—among many other examples—of the “Atomic Admiral” Deak Parsons, Vice President Levi Parsons Morton, and good old Jack Parsons. I mean, c’mon.

Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: We take a close look at the disinformation published on the Lincoln assassination more than a decade ago by the highest-level disinfo operation, “Miles Mathis”, which is still extant today. We can now carefully dissect it and examine what was said and what was not said, metaphorically penetrating and deflating Their most sophisticated disinformation program.

The first issue to be addressed is this: why should we consider Mathis the “highest-level” disinfo program? IOW, what should we use as the metric? The clear answer, from my perspective, is the level of truthful disclosure used to get the target audience to swallow the lies and follow the misdirections. I cannot even think of a comparison to Mathis on this score. (I did run across a cheap knockoff once that was just… beyond bad.)

You see, none of this has to do with the size of the audience or the prominence of the program in the public sphere. There were boatloads of people that listened to the Tic Tac UFO nonsense, and scads that cannot stop talking about the Flat Earth. None of those people will ever engage with the Mathis material, and none were ever intended to.

I will have to be brutally honest here: those people will never make a difference in the information war. Only a few recognize they’re on a battlefield, but even those few don’t have the sides correctly identified. All those people are bedazzled by the spectacles, or far too busy signaling their virtue, or consumed with how “right” their conclusions are. They are no threat and never will be.

There is a tiny minority, though, that seeks the truth at all costs, particularly as a precursor to any action. As Fox Mulder told us, “The truth is out there,” and this minority might just find it. After finding it, they might just tell other people, and eventually some of those people might be in a position and of a mind to do something about it. Mathis was sent forth to show that tiny minority some small part of the truth, then lead them on a fascinating and compelling journey away from it.

Mathis has a worldwide readership that I would guess to be in the low tens of thousands, counting anyone familiar with any of his work. These readers are high-level conspiracy theorists to have gotten that far. They evidently were judged to merit construction of this last ditch for them to fall into, worth the effort and—vitally—worth the necessary revelations. Of the few I have seen make it that far and fall into that ditch, almost none climbed their way back out. It’s an effective op.

What about the very words you’re reading right now? Is this another disinfo ditch? Well, out of 8 billion people in the world, there are probably 8 of them reading these words. This is all really a helluva lot of effort to derail one out of a billion, isn’t it? If “They” are that far ahead and working down to that level of detail, I mean… you should be asking yourself what you’re even doing here. I know I do, constantly.

So here we are at that final level, prepared to closely examine the subtle evidence revealing the cutting-edge practice of limited hangout disinformation sold as “conspiracy theory”. We begin with the paper where some years ago I personally learned the shocking truth:

Lincoln's Assassination was also a manufactured event (2/19/2014 36-page PDF)

“Mathis” is certainly a team of researchers and writers, not some dude in Taos, New Mexico, frittering away his spare time in front of a computer. In addition to some other clues and evidence, there is no way a single person could generate his volume of output. I am well aware of exactly how difficult and time-consuming that particular type of research and writing is. Ask me how I know.

The primary observation about high-level disinfo we can draw from this paper (and similarly from other work by “Miles Mathis”) is that there is not some master disinfo plan based on MKULTRA experimentation and crafted by quantum AI under the control of IQ 900 demons who are supervising the Simulation wherein…. All that is utter nonsense and you should be ashamed to be so mentally undisciplined as to consider such things. It’s dealing yourself a stack of wild cards and marveling at your skilled play.

So let’s deconstruct Mathis’s writing. To be sure, he does more than enough to satisfy the basic thesis—that the event was a hoax—coming at it from many different angles with facts and reasoning anyone could (and should) validate. When I wanted to provide someone with evidence the assassination was faked, I have linked that paper innumerable times—with the proper caveats.

Another major part of the paper discusses John Wilkes Booth, and it provides us with a critical revelation—not about Booth, per se, but about Mathis. You’ll find four Booths and even a Wilkins-Booth on the Salem witch trials list. Mathis never mentions that. Is it cunning misdirection? I feel strongly that it is not. He (the team, that is) just did not know at that time. You see, the crucial paper was more than a year and a half in the future:

The Salem Witch Trials were not what we have been told (10/19/2015 17-page PDF)

The “hangout” part of the “limited hangout” was giving away that the trials were faked. We were all supposed to read the paper and then walk away, smug and superior in our new knowledge. And that was supposed to be the end of it.

Clearly, the “MM” team never put two and two together themselves. Thus, they never expected nor anticipated anyone else doing it either. But someone finally did and here we are. Even with this tiny bit of analysis, can you really make yourself believe it was all planned? I am sure there are a few who can. Not me, though.

For a very long time in his work, and including much material in the Lincoln paper, Mathis pushed us towards “Intelligence” operations. This is a big part of the misdirection. You see, there’s nothing concrete about “Intelligence”, just this nebulous collections of organizations up to various nefarious hijinks. You see, for all the shit the CIA may be up to in the world, could you name a single individual in that huge bureaucracy who you would jerk out of his cube at Langley and drag to a courtroom? See what I mean about nebulous “Intelligence” and how it’s not going to get anyone anywhere?

Let me paint a picture to give you the basic illustration of what I imagine has gone on with “Miles”. It looks like a rep for whoever is really pushing the pieces around the board drops into the MM writing room one day and says, “Don’t you guys think it looks like Booth was some kind of Intelligence operative and that the assassination was staged as a big Intel psyop? Okay bye!”

That would have been when they were writing the paper in 2013, before it was published in 2014. Then maybe he drops by again in late 2015 and says, “You know, now that a lot of conspiracy theorists have figured out the Jews are behind a lot of stuff, and it’s now popular and costs nothing extra to blame them in conspiracy theory circles, don’t you guys think it was the Jews here too? BTW, have you seen this book we had written for us?”:

Addendum January 2, 2016: John Wilkes Booth may have been Jewish. It is not my research that discovered that, it is in the new book on Lincoln by Sarna and Shapell—who are Jewish themselves—and in the testimony of Booth's sister Asia and brother Edwin.

Then maybe mid-2016, he drops by once more with another helpful suggestion: “Hey, like Carlin said, it’s a Big Club. Not just that, seems like all these people are related to each other, doesn’t it?”:

Addendum, August 27, 2016: I just found an entire layer I missed the first time. It required a very close and extended study of the genealogy charts in the mid-1800s, which I later ended up doing as part of the research for many later papers, including my paper on Lizzie Borden, my paper on F. Scott Fitzgerald, and so on. Only by cross-referencing these many genealogy searches was I able to discover that all these families are closely related.

So from then on, MM’s papers were filled with dizzying webworks of genealogy. Frankly, the vast majority of it was pretty loose with very, very few links to documentation. You really had to take his word for it all. It got progressively more forced, making the web bigger and bigger, like claiming “Linton” was a variant of “Clinton”. Even in this very early Lincoln paper, you’d get lost in it. You were supposed to. As mentioned in a previous post, among other things They are working to defeat your efficiency.

We now finally arrive at the Salem Witches. Even then, in the Lincoln paper, the team was not hiding what I must imagine “They” now wish had remained hidden. There are bits here and there in the long, long paper, none of them crucial to the case for the hoax, and they could have easily left these out. First let me give you an example of the impressive cloud of association, meant ultimately to obscure:

That is to say—as that research relates to this paper—we find the Todds were related to the Surratts. They were also related to the Booths, Parkers and Rathbones. So we find more evidence this was all an inside job.

Let me blow the cloud away and show you that which was obscured. You know how I always say the Salem Witches operate from just outside the spotlight, and that the Parkers are the most prominent I have yet found? Well, get this, from the hand of Miles Mathis himself (or so to speak):

Now, what about that drunken policeman John Frederick Parker, who was allegedly next door at a pub while Abe was getting himself assasinated? He was also later the personal guard of Mary Todd Lincoln at the White House, indicating some relationship were aren't being told. Hold on to your hat, because this is the closest relationship of all. Mary Todd Lincoln's mother was Anne Elizabeth Parker. She had a brother Archibald Parker, who is listed as having no children. John could have been his son.

So there you have it, a high-level disinfo operation making my case for me over a decade ago. And now stop to ask yourself: Do you really think all this could be the carefully scripted work of DARPA’s Grok disInfoBot v911.3.2.2? Or maybe that super-intelligent aliens wrote it all into the Simulation because of some reason I can’t even think of an example of? Or that maybe it’s Satan way of testing your… whatever?

I think it’s just what it appears to be, and I’ve shown it to you just as I found it. Do not think “They” can’t be out-thunk. “They” have just been at it longer—for centuries, as we have seen—but look how fast we’ve been catching up. No wonder “They” seem desperate lately.

Final note: Sorry for how long all this Lincoln material turned out. Believe it or not, there is even more that should be documented about the Lincoln assassination and the Salem Witches that has not yet been written up. The evidence was always out there but no one recognized it for that it was, not even Miles Mathis. We’ll move on to some other Salem Witch hijinks, which I think you will find as surprising as I did.

In any case, I hope you find this useful. Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: We survey the landscape of conspiracy that has built up over a century and a half regarding this notable historical event. The bonus features yet another Parker.

Advisory: Aside from the bonus, there are no new revelations here. I assume everyone reading this is aware that it was a hoax and that the Salem Witches were behind it, just as they were behind so many other historical events. It all seems so familiar to me now, but I can imagine that if this was the first time someone encountered these claims, they might strike as quite unbelievable. In fact, if you can’t believe those claims might possibly be true, bail out now because you’re just going to get madder as we go along and present evidence to that effect.

This post is actually about the importance of efficiency in research. Sounds boring, but ask yourself this: Which do you think will run out first, Their capacity to generate bullshit and nonsense, or your capacity to find your way through it while avoiding throwing out the baby with the bathwater? It is vital to decide what you can ignore or discard as fast as possible.

There is a jungle of deceptions and irrelevancies that has grown up over the centuries, and They are busy planting more trees. You need a chainsaw to have any hope to get through it all and—just maybe—get to the truth. If you’ve carefully trimmed a beautiful topiary with nail clippers and you’re proudly showing it off to everyone who will come look, well… you’re getting what you wanted.

I’ll make a serious point that many will find offensive: if you’re a truth-seeker, you have got to get over trying to be the smartest person in the room. You seldom will be, so just forget about it. You see, we’re about to take a look at a lot of smart people saying a lot of smart things about Honest Abe, and most of it can be thrown out. The key issue is context.

Lincoln—as prominent as he is in history and even currently—was on the fringes of the Salem Witches and was always under their influence. All his actions and all events involving him must be evaluated in that light. For normies, a Presidential assassination is a big deal and faking one is out of the question (that is, until recently because They are getting really desperate to smear a certain someone in any way available).

However, for those familiar with the Salem Witches, such historical manipulations are commonplace. See how context changes everything? Again, if you’re new to this, the “receipts” were brought in a prequel post:

Was Abraham Lincoln just some rando born in a log cabin? You won’t think so after hearing who he’s connected to, like the Salem Witches and even more Parkers (conspiracies.win 7/23/2025)

To coin a new term, this is a “meta-deep-dive” into the historiography (or so to speak) of the 1865 Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. First, should we say “alleged” assassination? The issue here is that for virtually anyone that knows about it, it is not alleged. You could not point to a single person literally alleging that it happened.

That is, no one prefaces any statement regarding it with, “I claim that President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated, and….” It just happened and everyone knows it. Yet it did not. As big as the English language is, we don’t really have an adjective or noun for this particular state of affairs, perhaps aside from “psychosis”.

The second item to notice concerns the base level of “common knowledge”. Lincoln was shot by a moody loner with a gun, obviously. All subsequent such events get anchored to that “knowledge”. Every time we are told a moody loner with a gun does what moody loners do, we all “know” what happened.

I was recently watching the classic “Ring of Power: Empire of the City” conspiracy documentary. You have to admit it goes pretty deep, does it not? However, they described the assassination as when “a gunman with European connections shot him down in cold blood”. A big miss, particularly considering the next item.

The third item to notice is that the mainstream actually admits that the assassination was the result of a conspiracy. You can read up on it right on that wiki page—it was quite elaborate. A number of people were (purportedly) hanged for it. But my point is that very, very few people realize this. I myself never knew there was a larger conspiracy until I read the paper by Miles Mathis a number of years ago. The world and my view of it have come a long way since then.

I saw it suggested several times that the recent assassination attempts involving Crookes and Routh should be presumed to be conspiracies and investigated on that basis. I think I heard the Lincoln conspiracy mentioned once in response. Of course, everyone was shouted down as “conspiracy theorists”.

Actually, that conspiracy too is being written out of history and I’ll tell you how. Do you remember the film Lincoln from 2012? Produced and directed by Steven Spielberg, if that indicates anything to you. In the 2016 Presidential debates, I recall Hillary cited the film as if it was actual history. No one I was watching with was similarly scandalized. I never actually saw the film, but do want to know how wiki summarizes the part of the plot where the assassination takes place?

On April 14, Lincoln meets members of his cabinet to discuss future measures to enfranchise blacks, before leaving for Ford's Theatre. That night, while Lincoln's son Tad is watching a play at Grover's Theatre, the manager stops the play to announce that the President has been shot. The next morning, at the Petersen House, Lincoln dies with a peaceful expression across his face….

A heart-rending narrative of American bullshit. There was no conspiracy because Spielberg and the screenwriters did not deign to give us one. The film isn’t historical—it is how history is written, understand?

Here we begin the exercise in efficiency. Knowing what you know now about Lincoln, if you had the opportunity to try to inform a fellow truth-seeker about what was “really going on” with the assassination, how much of the wiki page on it would be important to your case? Not very much at all, right? Yet it distills God knows much work of historians on the event. Virtually worthless.

The same applies to a lesser extent to what I might call “suppressed mainstream scholarship”. It’s drawn from all the same sources using all the same methods as conventional scholarship, but it somehow never gets discussed because it clashes with the mainstream narrative.

Contrary to that narrative, Lincoln was a tyrannical jerk. A site that has a lot of such research is run by Lew Rockwell, former Chief of Staff for Ron Paul, and you might like to begin with this search on his site. I particularly recommend the work of Thomas DiLorenzo. You may wish to look up his video presentations on YouTube about Lincoln and other subjects.

Even all that material must be reconsidered with the knowledge that Lincoln was a lifelong pawn embedded in a larger game. It’s very hard to say what Lincoln “did” or “thought”, because you wonder what forces were manipulating him behind the scenes. Crucially, you would only be able to discern those forces if you knew they existed, right?

So we have seen that the mainstream authorizes us to believe certain conspiracies, and that these authorizations may also be revoked. At the level of “conspiratorial” conspiracies (again, there are no terms for this), there are a range of theories more in keeping with the connotation of “not discussed in the mainstream to this day”. A good selection of them is here:

LINCOLN ASSASSINATION THEORIES: A SIMPLE CONSPIRACY OR A GRAND CONSPIRACY? (Roger J. Norton)

What to say about them? It’s not so much that they’re wrong, it’s that they’re not right. They may be made of all true and important facts, yet none ever get at the vital truths of the event. Well, okay, they tried their best, right? Similar to Norton is the legendary Dave McGowan. While his major works are mentioned quite frequently, I’ve never once heard anyone mention his magisterial 12-part series on:

WHY EVERYTHING YOU THINK YOU KNOW ABOUT THE LINCOLN ASSASSINATION IS WRONG (Center for an Informed America)

It’s about as good as you’ll get from any conspiracy researcher and he has a well-deserved reputation. Dave, though, never really “cracked the code”. I suppose it just never occurred to him it was all a hoax. As much research as he’d done—even on the Moon Landing hoax—was it still outside his Overton Window that the Lincoln assassination was also faked? I found one single comment on the final installment saying this:

All these comments and to some extent McGowan’s writings suggest that Lincoln died from injuries suffered on April 14, 1865. Did he?

No, Kent, he did not. Anyway, skim through Dave’s writeup and ask yourself—knowing what you know now—how much of it you would feel vital to pass along at the next conspiracy cocktail party. Again, I’m trying to make a point about efficiency in research.

But past efficiency there is a huge problem: off-target conspiracy theory opens a perfect vector for disinformation. We don’t see it much with Lincoln since the event is so old, but all the high-profile JFK assassination research is such disinformation. It’s all true and it’s all tantalizing and it will get you exactly nowhere and it has worked perfectly since 1963. That’s why the CIA wrote it.

Bonus: I stumbled into another one. As I mentioned, I never watched Lincoln and I was browsing through the very long cast list to see who was in it. Fifth from the bottom—so far down I suspect his name was never spoken in the movie itself—was “Asa-Luke Twocrow as Lieutenant Colonel Ely S. Parker”. You gotta be kiddin me. After a bit of research, I have three things to say about this guy.

First, yes, he’s definitely one of “those” Parkers. You’ll see he was all tied up with a guy named Lewis H. Morgan. If you’re thinking, “Haha, as in JP?”, yes. They actually admit that right on Lewis’ page.

Second, you’ll notice that he’s Native American, or at least he ain’t white. That recalls something Mark Passio mentioned about the Satanists he had been involved with. He said they were of all races, all ethnicities, rich, poor, young, old, all types of occupations. All the Parkers I’ve dug up so far have been white, but we can see there’s no prohibition on intermarriage or perhaps adoption.

Third, you know how I always say these Salem Witches operate from just outside the spotlight? Turns out Ely was Ulysses S. Grant’s right-hand man in the Civil War (i.e. War of Northern Aggression). He even “wrote much of Grant's correspondence”.

This phenomenon, of being just outside the center and unnoticed, frequently reminds me of another film. In Forrest Gump, Tom Hanks (you will recall from the last post Abe’s mother was born Nancy Hanks) shows up in the background of all kinds of famous historical events.

Well, have you ever taken a close look at the iconic lithograph of when Lee Surrenders to Grant at Appomattox? Just like he was fifth from the bottom of the cast list, take a look at who is fifth from the right in that picture. Seriously, I don’t think I’m going too far to say that all of mainstream history needs to be reconsidered.

Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: “They” have been anything but honest with us about just who “Honest Abe” really was. Surprised or not surprised? Far from being a poor boy who wanted to work hard and save the Union, Lincoln was born into the Small Club You Ain’t In and has surprising connections to all kinds people. “They” always prefer to use family members as their stooges because they are surrounded from birth by people they know and trust. In the bonus, research on a toy shows we just cannot get away from “Them”.

Advisory: Sorry this is so long but perhaps it’s some indication of how much history has not been written down in history books.

The first question might be: why would you even care about this dude that got smoked a century and a half ago? Competing for first question: why would I care? Or, how did I come to be writing about this guy? As always, I stumbled into all this.

I was writing a post about a famous event that few know was a grand historical hoax, focusing on the disinformation obscuring important truths even in the limited hangout exposing it as a hoax:

Lincoln's Assassination was also a manufactured event (Miles Mathis 2/19/2014 36-page PDF)

Mathis is, of course, all about deep genealogy and esoteric matters, stuff that might require you to have a library card. In contrast, almost all of the stuff I’m about to point out to you is right in Wikipedia. My interpretation—which you are free to reject—is that the “Miles Mathis” writing team, rather than limiting that part of their hangout, actually did not themselves possess the fuller picture and did not realize the importance of what they were handing over. That’s a danger of compartmentalization.

We should begin with what They most love to hand us because it’s what we most love to hear: a “rags-to-riches” story:

Abraham Lincoln's Boyhood; Raised in the Poorest of Circumstances. (THE DIGITAL RESEARCH LIBRARY OF ILLINOIS HISTORY JOURNAL 3/26/2021)

No boy ever began life under less promising auspices than young Abraham Lincoln. The family was very poor!

Be sure to take a look at the third photo, captioned, “Twenty-one-year-old Abraham Lincoln moved to Illinois with his family in March 1830. Digital image from an 1865 b&w film negative.” I should correct myself and say “drawing”, because it very obviously is. I also seriously doubt anyone in 1865 took a photo of that pen-and-ink drawing.

As another rule of narrative-building, when it may be tough to cover up a “riches-to-more-riches” story, they first sell us a “riches-to-rags” story. From Abe’s wiki:

Lincoln's father bought multiple farms in Kentucky but could not get clear property titles to any, losing hundreds of acres in legal disputes. In 1816, the family moved to Indiana, where land titles were more reliable.

Cool story about land titles, bro. Anyway, back at the log cabin here’s mom blowing sunshine at this young loser doomed to grinding lifelong poverty:

Once [his mother] said to him: "Abraham, learn all you can, and grow up to be of some account. You've got just as good Virginian blood in you as George Washington had." Abraham never forgot this.

And this is what They would like you to forget: Abe really was descended from the Harrison family of Virginia. It includes a Founding Father, three Presidents, and Elvis (who was another big project). Nor do I believe this to be some tangential connection, since we are told:

Another York County line begins with Richard Harrison (1600–1664) from Essex, England.

The Salem Witches were primarily from Essex, England and created Essex County, Massachusetts as some sort of replica of it. A “new” England indeed. Further, I consider that the more important part of Abe’s blood for our purposes was not Virginian but Massachusite. The Lincoln family rooted itself all the way back in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Yes, they have their own wiki page just like every other family without promising auspices.

The progenitor, Samuel Lincoln, arrived in 1637. The families I’ve been researching arrived during the Puritan Great Migration, particularly in the 1635-40 time frame. They sometimes say Samuel was himself a Puritan, pointing out that succeeding generations all had Biblical names. I am working under the thesis that all these families were generational Satanists, so perhaps we need not be too precise as to public religious identifications.

Samuel settled in Hingham, Massachusetts. Where is that, you ask? Well, if you stood on the shore of Hingham Bay and looked due north over the water, about 20 miles away would be Salem. Whaddaya know. But maybe Samuel was just one of “your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free”, huh? If so, then this would be mere happenstance:

Samuel's mother also belonged to a family long associated with the American government: the Gilmans of Exeter, New Hampshire. Samuel's mother Bridget Gilman was the daughter of Edward Gilman of Hingham, Norfolk, England, whose son Edward Gilman Jr. emigrated to Hingham, Massachusetts, later to Ipswich, Massachusetts, and finally to Exeter, where he and his family became prominent businessmen, elected officials and, later, ardent Revolutionary War patriots. Nicholas Gilman, a signer of the U.S. Constitution, was a member of this family.

Okay, so your “out”, at this point, is that perhaps all this spooky Elite shit wore off through the several generations between Samuel and Abraham, right? Nope, it’s gets worse! Abe’s mother was Nancy Lincoln. She was born Nancy Hanks. Yes, “that” Hanks! They admit right on her page that she’s related to Tom Hanks. No one would contest his inclusion on the Mt. Rushmore of Hollyweird Creeps, am I right?

In the same “Notable relatives” section, you’ll find a surprise: Camille Olivia Hanks, who is the wife of Bill Cosby. It’s too long to go into but the whole Cosby affair was another psyop, and now you see it didn’t come purely out of left field. Did you ever take a look at his primary accuser, Andrea Constand? Google up some pics and I think you’ll notice what I did. Also, look up information on the case and you’ll see them carefully steer around any specific mention of customary male-female sexual congress. IOW, the old PIV. Now you know why.

You’ll also find George Clooney there. He’s the most obvious Intelligence asset in Hollywood today, isn’t he? Also, take a look at the wiki for his wife, Amal Clooney. Her backstory screams that she’s another Intelligence asset.

Now, I won’t argue the point but I just wanted to mention a suspicion I’ve long harbored. Take a good look at Amal’s picture next to George’s. Does it strike you that she is a younger female version of George himself? IOW, a gender-flipped clone-y? He would finally be able to make love to himself. Too far? Too far by me or by him?

So that was Abe’s mom, but did you know he had a stepmom? She was born—get this—Sarah Bush. Coinkydink? I don’t think so. Let’s put two and two together and see what we get. Her father:

Christopher Bush, a settler of Dutch ancestry, was a financially well-off slave patrol captain. Described as "a stirring, industrious man," he owned more than two thousand acres of Kentucky land.

And my mom always said slave-patrolling didn’t pay well. Dutch, though, huh? Here’s who we find on the page for Dutch Americans:

George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush, 41st and 43rd Presidents, respectively. They count members of the Schuyler family and the related Beekman family among their ancestors.

I don’t think they would ever admit that these Bushes are the same as the other Bushes, but I’m marking it down as “provisionally true”. For confirmation, we’ll have to wait for an official denial. Let me also note this coincidence, though: that page also lists Theodore Roosevelt. He became President when William McKinley was shot. Know who was on-scene at that assassination? Robert Todd Lincoln. Moving on….

Can you guess the name of where Abe moved to when he first went out on his own? It’s now called Lincoln's New Salem. C’mon, no one could make this up! It writes itself.

We’re finally getting down to it. Abe’s wife was Mary Todd Lincoln. Her mother was born Elizabeth Ann Parker. We have found this to be the most prominent name of all the Salem Witches, have we not?

You will still need your list of people of the Salem witch trials, because we next find out Mary’s great-grandfather was Andrew Porter, another Hero of the Revolution. His first wife was another woman named Eliza Parker. I would also highlight from his page that with his second wife, he had a daughter:

Elizabeth Rittenhouse Porter (1769–1850), who married Robert Porter Parker (1760–1800) and was the grandmother of Mary Todd Lincoln.

Makes me wonder if Kyle was also not just some rando. In any case, we can see how They like to “keep it in the family”.

To round out the final act (<- get it?) of Lincoln’s life, the assassination, here is what we have: Mary Todd (a Parker) sitting next to Abe, Robert Todd (a Parker) who was supposed to have been there, policeman John Frederick Parker who abandoned his post outside the door, and shooter John Wilkes Booth. The other couple in the box, Henry Rathbone and his fiancée Clara Harris were actually step-siblings. His mother and her step-mother was Pauline Penney. The witness to Booth entering the theater box was Navy Surgeon Dr. George Brainerd Todd. Nobody even asks whether he was related to Mary, but c’mon. That’s how low the bar on research really is. Abe was succeeded by Andrew Johnson.

Bonus: Although in the age of screens it’s sure to soon become extinct, a popular toy for a century has been Lincoln Logs. Fun as they may be, it occurred to me that they were created to cement this bullshit “Honest Abe born in a log cabin” narrative. They really are that devious, aren’t They? To be honest, I predicted they would have been sold by Parker Brothers. Not so.

It turns out they were created by John Lloyd Wright, second son of Frank Lloyd Wright. I would think that if you asked anyone to name an architect, his would be the first one out of their mouths (if any, that is). Now Jeez, Frank couldn’t be in on all this, could he?

Get this: the very first thing about him, in oh-so-characteristic fashion for these shadowy Elites, is that there is confusion over exactly what his name was. That’s how shadowy they are. In 1987, a biographer suggested his name may have actually been "Franklin Lincoln Wright". Ohhh, Lincoln, huh? Beyond that, we must recall that the main witness at the Salem Witch Trials was Bethshua Folger, maternal aunt of Benjamin Franklin. Mere coincidence? Let’s keep looking.

Frank’s father, William Wright, was a minister that supposedly could not hold down a job or some such thing, and as a result the family moved literally all over the map: Wisconsin, Iowa, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts. In fact, we are told William was originally from the Bay State, and in 1874 had a pastorate in Weymouth, Massachusetts. Know where that is? Right next door to Hingham, where Samuel Lincoln settled so long ago in time and in this post. Huh.

Anyway, Frank’s first gig is as an intern. He’s constantly short of money because of his expensive tastes, although we’re not told how he got expensive tastes in the first place. To make up the shortfall, he accepts independent commissions to design at least nine houses. They are eventually built and known by the names of the purchasers. Some of them still stand today and one of them is the Robert P. Parker House. I wonder if his friends called him “Robbie”?

Anyway, the Lincoln Logs thing wasn’t so crazy after all, was it? Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: A roundup of revelations related to the event that led to the US in WWI. Please stay tuned for the bonus, where I’ll tell you something you’ve never heard the (real) Trump assassination attempt.

Somewhere along the line I realized there was something odd about World War I (1914-1918): nobody ever talked about it. I could probably name 50 pop culture works based on WW2, but only All Quiet on the Western Front (1929) that takes place in the prequel. Actually, there was also a movie on Netflix about the “Christmas truce” (12/24-26/1914), but They don’t want anyone to know that human beings are allergic to war and love peace much better, so I’m surprised it was made in the first place.

Then there’s the whole deal about how it all started. I mean, how odd is it that there are lots of people who could tell you it was precipitated by the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, but yet have no clue whatsoever how that could have possibly led to the US fighting in a giant war on another continent. What the hell did Franz Ferdinand do to Americans? Or for Americans? The whole thing is compounded when you find out it was a laughable hoax (Miles Mathis 11/20/2021 11-page PDF).

I think you will come to recognize the same rule I have: when the effect of a psychological operation has been achieved, They let it die. If left alive in the public imagination, the only thing that’s going to happen is that someone will come along and stir up inconvenient truths. Haha, that’s what we’re going to do right here with the Lusitania!

Another point: it’s Conspiracy 101 to recite that the Gulf of Tonkin incident was the hoax that sparked the Vietnam War. Bonus points for name-checking Rear Admiral George Stephen Morrison, father of Jim Morrison of The Doors. But what about the incident that sparked the US into World War I?

You see, the Vietnam War was a regional conflict with a lot of brown people killing brown people way out in the jungle. Not to be racist about this, but World War I, by comparison, was white Christians in Europe murdering each other on a mechanized industrial scale. You can compare the stats on deaths and casualties, both military and civilians, and find that there is no comparison. If America is so racist, WWI is the one we should all care about, right? How weird is it that there’s so little attention to the far larger conflict? There is also the fact that it was just the setup to the somehow far more bloody World War 2.

All that said, let’s give it some of the attention it deserves, beginning at the beginning of the part that finally ropes in the Americans, the Sinking of the RMS Lusitania on May 7, 1915….

I always resist doing this but since—as I have just finished so laboriously saying—this part of history is so unfamiliar to most, I have to “give you the answer” before we examine the subtle evidence. I called it a “false flag” but it should be more properly called a “provocation”. There’s just so much lying involved that “false flag” seems more fitting.

In any case, they loaded up the Lusitania with literally tons of contraband munitions and thousands of innocent people that just wanted to get across the ocean. The German embassy took out advertisements to warn people not to sail on it, but the US State Dept quashed almost all of them. Near Ireland, a German U-boat put a torpedo into the ship, and that set off some of those munitions causing a huge secondary explosion. Whereas big ships hit by a single torpedo took hours to sink or did not sink at all, the Lusitania sank very quickly causing a huge loss of life. That included 128 Americans and that was enough. Hey there, basically isolationist and strongly of Germanic ancestry America, welcome to WWI.

First, you might be surprised to find that Wikipedia admits to a lot of that scenario, although in a less-than-direct way. The thing is, since a major motion picture like Titanic has not been made about Lusitania, probably about 98% of the US population has no idea any of this took place. For a longer version of events (but lacking the deep conspiracy we’ll get into later), please see:

The Lusitania: The Ship That Helped Launch Millions of Deaths (revisionist.net)

Next we go to the most modern and advanced of disinformation by our old familiar friend:

The Sinking of the Lusitania was Faked (Miles Mathis 3/2/2021 16-page PDF)

I had actually stopped reading Mathis for a year and a half by the time this was published, so I didn’t know it existed until yesterday. Certainly, there are truths in the paper and you should examine it for those truths, but here are the bullshit angles he’s pushing: (1) everything is fake, (2) everything was done by British aristocrats, (3) British aristocrats are secretly Jews, and (4) by Jews he means the Phoenician Navy. We don’t have time to fully address those points, but if you’re inclined to accept them, I don’t think you need to bother reading any further. What I’ll be telling you are the things I would claim such disinfo is to keep you from discovering.

By the way, as discussed in several previous posts, I maintain that the sinking of the Titanic and all subsequent events related to it were an utter hoax. None of it ever happened and there’s no wreck at the bottom of the ocean. This is to say I have no reservation in principle that such things can be successfully faked. Not here, though.

You see, if you can read up on all this and think all the info was planted to fool the handful of people that are aware of it, well, I don’t know what I could say to you. For example, while Mathis gets you all caught up in numerology, you would have to imagine all this background was manufactured:

The Lusitania Was "45,000 Tons Of Live Bait": How The War Party Triggers War Fever (David Stockman)

I mean, “They” just never put in that kind of effort into their bullshit backstories because they know for a fact no one is looking. One novel item I would submit into the body of “Lusitania conspiracy” (and of which Mathis has nothing to say) is that the whole thing was a setup from the jump. From that last article:

In 1913, Churchill called in the head of Cunard and said Lusitania would have to be refitted for a war he predicted would break out in September 1914.

Good guess, Winnie. But even long before that, from the wiki for the Cunard Line we find:

In 1902, White Star joined the American-owned International Mercantile Marine Co. In response, the British Government provided Cunard with substantial loans and a subsidy to build two superliners needed to retain Britain's competitive position.

White Star would christen the Titanic in a decade. There really is a boatload to say about all things Titanic, and if you want to open up that kettle of fish, you’d have to start at my latest post on it and deep-dive your way backwards through the links:

Let’s put the spotlight on James Cameron: the Titanic hoax, the Manson false flag, the Salem Witch Trials, and a secret son? (conspiracies.win 4/9/2025)

What I’m pointing towards is that we’re dealing with a tight little group moving all these pieces around on the chessboard. It’s as close to “They” are you’re going to get, and they have operated for centuries in a covert underworld. I’d link you to the “conspiracy alternate history book” for the full context of what I’m writing but none such has ever been written. Really, it’s what we’re painstakingly doing now and why these posts are so long. Anyway, way down the line Their chess moves end up as unrelated “historical events”.

If you’ve read previous posts, you know I always say these Salem Witch chess-piece-movers work just outside the spotlight, right? Well, guess what: I spotted one just outside the spotlight. The wiki on the sinking says this:

At about 11:52 on 7 May, the ship received another warning from the Admiralty, probably as a result of a request by Alfred Booth, who was concerned about Lusitania….

Does he sound like a mover? Does to me. That’s the first mention of him but his name isn’t hot-linked, which is quite anomalous considering he does indeed have a wiki page: Alfred Allen Booth. Yep, we’re back to bolding because we just found names on the list of people of the Salem witch trials.

Want more connections? You got it. Alfred’s mom was Lydia Allen Butler. One of his daughters was Mary Blake Dwight. His maternal grandfather was Benjamin Franklin Butler. Ben Franklin’s aunt, Bethshua Folger, testified at the trials.

Now, do I really think that Alfred Booth was a relative of the Booths involved in the Salem Witch Trials and other historical fabrications, and who are generational Satanists, and who did all this nefarious shit for years culminating in the sinking of the Lusitania and the deaths of 1200 people in May 1915, and which led further to America’s entry into WWI and many more deaths?

Booth was created a baronet in 1916 by Prime Minister H. H. Asquith for supporting Britain's war effort and services to industry.

Yes, yes I do.

I’m sure by now that the name John Wilkes Booth has come to mind. There’s a case to made that he was of the same Booth family so it’s no surprise that Lincoln's Assassination was also a manufactured event (Miles Mathis 2/19/2014 36-page PDF). In fact there’s much more to be said about the Booths which will have to wait, including that the Booths are related to—get this—the Gores of melted polar ice cap fame.

Bonus: What about the Trump assassination, widely considered—even by some normies—to be fake? People actually seem to take pride in believing that, as if they have seen through the curtain. You may end up with as low an opinion as I do of that theory and of those who subscribe to it after reading this.

Remember Alfred Booth’s maternal grandfather, Benjamin Franklin Butler? I haven’t done the full genealogical work, but I feel certain he’s related fairly closely to this guy: General Richard Butler, a hero of the Revolutionary War. In fact, he’s famous enough to have a town named after him, although I suspect you never heard of it until recently: Butler, Pennsylvania. Ring a bell? What a coincidence, huh? There’s more.

If you’re a regular reader of my posts, you know I go on and on about the Parker family, and how they’re the most prominent of these generational Satanists I’ve ever unearthed, and yada yada yada, even back to the Salem Witch Trials, right?

It just so happens that one of Benjamin Franklin Butler’s great-grandmothers was Deborah Parker. General Richard Butler’s mother was Eleanor Parker. BTW, guess who predicted there would be an attempt on Trump’s life two days before it happened? Craig Hamilton-Parker:

Psychic who envisioned Trump assassination attempt gives his US election prediction (Metro 7/21/2024)

And to wrap it all around to the subject at hand, from the revisionist.net article linked at the top:

Sir Gilbert Parker, the member of the British propaganda bureau in charge of information and propaganda aimed at the USA, used the occasion to rush the infamously dishonest “Bryce Report of German Atrocities” into print within five days after the sinking, with the sole aim of bringing the USA into the war on Britain’s side.

C’mon now, you really cannot make this shit up, can you? You kind of want to throw up when you accept that no, no one made it up.

Thanks, as always, for reading.