3
Michalusmichalus 3 points ago +3 / -0

Beside this being the first time the correct picture is being shown?

1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have. The report about this is why google doesn't have an ethics department anymore. They wanted the woman to retract the paper, and she said no. Wishful thinking doesn't make the hardware.

1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +1 / -0

If we don't currently have the means to process the amount of data we have, it doesn't make sense why we would make a more powerful stupid machine.

1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unless the video is embedded somewhere I won't even click the links. Now theyre designed to install the app rather then play the video. I'm not doing it.

2
Michalusmichalus 2 points ago +2 / -0

For the headline readers. China has a government office in all companies in China. That means any company saying they don't share data with China isn't exactly lying, they just don't have to share. That's why your iPhones are being made in India now. Too many companies won't let iPhones past security lines. It started hurting the bottom line.

The reason tiktok would rather close then sell is the twitter files. What happened when Elon bought Twitter? Elon owned all their manipulation materials Twitter was doing to censor us. Tiktok just saw it happen with X. Of course they'd rather close then be forced to sell. But, America is tired of China owning too much of America, tiktok being invasive spyware that China legislated their kids can't use more than short amounts of time was the last straw. They fucking know its designed to do harm.

1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +1 / -0

When I go on, it's busier than here. Idk why you think no one uses it. Now, truth streaming may need more users.

1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I get called a shill for having a different opinion. You just called an entire list of people skills because you dislike their internet habits. You don't get to pop quiz me. There's a report button that usually gets ignored if you have an issue. Otherwise, you acted very glowie forum sliding.

Why the need to make drama? There's enough drama in the news.

1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I post that information typed up, easier to read. It's good to have.

I have a bias because I argue with the same people, and hold no grudges. We are all different personalities. I can't say everyone is just a different personality, but I spotted a few listed that have simply decided to have a theme. I previously had to explain internet safety 101 once because although I know it, I don't see the point. Creating a new account is what we all should be doing. Seeing users enraged because someone is doing things the correct way, was interesting.

Because this is text, I can't tell if you're accusing me of something. But, I disagree with the OP. You may not see me much lately, but that is because c/conspiracy is slow. I started sorting by new. I end up in the weirdest fucking places.

6
Michalusmichalus 6 points ago +7 / -1

These personal attack posts are getting old. Especially when I can easily see some of the users you target just have a habit you don't like. Personal attacks happen to be against the rules. For a reason.

https://www.scribd.com/document/215760090/The-Gentleman-s-Guide-to-Forum-Spies-Spooks

2
Michalusmichalus 2 points ago +2 / -0

The two I referenced originally are fans of each other. If you look for them together on the tube you'll get the clearest idea there. The Diehold Foundation can be technical, but very good. Doug Voight recently passed. He had a theory that technology was found.

Time travel as a theory is new to me. It's not clear to me if there's evidence that Jorjani is putting together in a way others wouldn't, or if he's just doing a thought experiment. Everything I've referenced is very cited.

2
Michalusmichalus 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not familiar with his work. Would you consider it to overlap with Michael Tsarion, and Ralph Ellis?

0
Michalusmichalus 0 points ago +1 / -1

Are you looking for long lost kids to pay child support for? Because some of those kids just like to jump dead beats.

0
Michalusmichalus 0 points ago +1 / -1

That son just turned 21, and knows he's a man that likes girls. Falling asleep watching dumb ass shit no-one needs to know just means I go turn it off. That's how I know the ads are just as fucking stupid as the no one needs to fucking know podcast.

2
Michalusmichalus 2 points ago +2 / -0

My son falls sleeps listening to podcasts that play gambling ads, and gambling addiction ads in the same fucking show. It's mind numbing.

1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a campaign or something. I fell asleep reading so many arguments. It doesn't make any sense. It's about to get cold in the mountains, making sure there's enough shouldn't be an issue.

2
Michalusmichalus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Everything gets diverted, and ruined.

1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is the opposite of what's on Reddit. Reddit has a campaign going that FEMA is doing great.

view more: Next ›