logic mistake...use of words
a) sound implies perceivable offer...choosing suggested words implies mistake aka taking suggested, while missing perceivable.
b) taking any word aka consenting to any suggested definition (definite; fixed), while being (life) within motion (inception towards death); will tempt one into conflicts of reason (correct vs incorrect; belief vs disbelief; good vs bad etc.).
Logic/Logos equals reason...words equal conflict.
Example...EVIL=LIVE. How could reasoning dissolve that inherent contradiction?
always
Tempts one to ignore being (life) within way (inception towards death) of all (motion).
all
Tempts one to ignore being one (partial) within all (whole).
every
Tempts one to ignore each one within everything (all).
a) truth (wanting suggested) or lie (not wanting suggested) or change (needing perceivable)...it's ones free will of choice what to respond to.
b) MAT'TER, noun (Latin materia; Heb. to measure) + MEASURE, noun (Latin mensura) - "whole extent".
Being implies partial (perception) within whole (perceivable)...measuring others tempts one to ignore being proportion (growth) within measure (loss).
They deliberately conflate and divorce things
Ones consent to suggested pluralism (they) implies conflation (melting together), while ignoring being partial (perception) divorced (separated by dissolution) within whole (perceivable).
Separated (life) by dissolution (inception towards death).
Who knows?
a) Reasoning (yes vs no) about suggested tempts one to ignore KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
b) Each one knows (perceives) all (perceivable)...unless ignored for the suggestions by one another.
your money has been seized
Ones consent to suggested "money" permits others ownership over M_ONE_Y aka MY ONE, hence money representing a suggested ownership transfer of oneself to another...willingly; consensual through bank & TRUST.
they tie the word
a) A suggestion is loose until one ties it by consent.
b) Perceivable sound implies loose; suggested words implies letters bound together. Sound moves; words (definitions aka affixed meaning) tempt one to ignore being (life) moved (inception towards death).
they are not one and the same.
Different partials (ones) can only exist within same whole (one)...all is one in energy aka "all for one and one for all" aka "there can be only one" aka alone...ALL(in)ONE.
Others suggest nihilism (not) to tempt one to deny perceivable for suggested.
israel...jew
Aka "he that strives (life) with god (inception towards death) and jew (phonetic you)...implies different one within same all.
decentralized nature
Being implies center (life) of nature (inception towards death).
being entirely open
Only while being (perception) enclosed within entire (perceivable) can oneself open up (discernment).
everyone has access to all
Ones free will of choice has access to all perceivable balance...unless ignored for the suggested choices by other ones.
who are skeptical/oblivious
Ignorance implies one willing denial of perceivable for suggested (skepticism). The more suggested one bears within ones mind/memory; the more oblivious ones sight within perceivable becomes.
So, you wanna pretend the world would be just as evil and horrific without (((them)))
a) want vs not want implies reasoning. A tool to divide many against each other over suggestions by few.
b) good vs evil...reasoning based on ones consent to suggested moralism. A tool to gain consensual control over manner aka over ones free will of choice.
c) "without" implies a suggested inversion of being within (life) outside (inception towards death).
d) suggested terrorism (horror) tempts one to be afraid of suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin.
e) suggested pluralism (them) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore self for others.
f) suggested (fiction) is utilized to pretend perceivable (reality)...a deceptive appearance if one consents to it.
tl; dr...exploitation of many by few implies a natural reaction to prevent accumulation of mass. Solids (life) within fluid (inception towards death) are being set apart from one another, while tempting each other back together.
Ignoring cause (perceivable) gets one addicted (consent) to opiates (suggested).
Notice that to form a clan (secular from others) oneself (secular from others) has to first come together with others...that implies seeking others to secularize self from others.
primacy of patriarchal
Patriarch (motion) to matriarch (momentum) to off-spring (being). Clan implies secondary to being primary. Being implies center of matriarchal patriarchy...simultaneously.
haplogroup
GROUP (compound) contradicts HAPLO (single).
my personal
How could it be mine if it implies per-sonos (by sound)?
you have said objective
Forming voice within sound implies subjective...
my duty to defend society
Coming together tempts one to ignore defending self. Try waging war against self without others to fight against...
Notice the difference between so called antisemitism by gentiles (blaming jew for behavior) and antisemitism propagated through jews (always attached to established narratives).
The latter permits the jew to blanket the former, hence diverting from anything related to behavior.
This pronoun bullshit is pathetic
a) Path (inception towards death) generates units (life)...it doesn't name (noun).
b) before (pro) name (nomen) implies ones consent to a suggested name.
c) if one consents to a suggested name; then one permits others to attach anything to it.
or am I?
OR, a termination of Latin nouns - "it denotes an agent, as in actor, creditor"...action (inception towards death) terminates reactions (life); while germinating resistance.
they really don't want to make a meme
"If a jew offers direction; then it gets easier to shoot goys following in the back".
it's more of an unsolved mystery than a conspiracy
a) If others suggest one a plot; then others are scheming to involve ones consent with the plot. That implies conspiring.
b) Consenting to the suggestions by others tempts one to miss perceivable, while permitting others to shape suggested into a cover for perceivable, hence cloaking ones sight in mystery.
Suggestion (fiction) represents a mist over perception (reality)...a mist mixed out of the suggested and ones consent to it.
c) as for more...there's nothing more than perceivable (whole) for each ones perception (partial) within.
The foundation for more and less implies being more (growth) within less (loss) aka temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
a way to end
Only one way for each ones (life) beginning (inception) and end (death)...momentum of motion.
mass awareness
a) It's each ones awareness that is being ignored when choosing to participate in suggested collectivism (mass).
b) No matter what one amasses; it could never amount to awareness, since a mass implies a blending of particulars, and blending (mixing together; confounding) makes those within blind and confused aka preventing each one from distinguishing self.
they did it...
Did they do it to each aware one, or did they try to collectivize those aware first, while wondering why so many aware ones seem to slip through collective efforts?
can now reach the point
Point implies "end of sentence"...to be implies ones life sentence right "now".
is not everything
Why utilize nothing (not) when suggesting what everything is?
more expensive than
If loss (inception towards death) gives growth (life); then what could be more generous than generation itself?
a similar price
Aka resemblance as a praise from another to distract one from discerning self as being different from one another.
The funny thing about goyslop...
...it tempts one to blame others (jewish poison) instead of reflecting upon self (sloppy goy).
disgust
a) DIS (separation from) GUSTO (taste)
b) TASTE, verb -"to perceive by means of the tongue"...notice the use of "disgusting" when reacting to the taste of something suggested by others, which implies aftertaste.
c) "That he by the grace of God should taste death for every man" ~Hebrews 2:9.
Every man (life) tastes death (inception towards death) at each moment of being, hence shedding; effusing; diffusing; dispersing as solid (growth) within fluid (loss).
As usual... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2Twgwekk.jpg
Priorities haven't been student
a) Ones consent (student) to suggested (teacher) tempts one to ignore prior...perceivable.
b) Priority of perception needs to be perceivable...wanting or not wanting suggested tempts one to ignore that.
test score
- TEST (testament; to make a will aka to to choose) + SCORE (a line drawn)
It's line (inception towards death) which draws each ones (life) free will of choice...consenting to get scored for tests by others tempts one to ignore that.
They use subliminal messaging in their music
Which is rather simple, since each one consenting to their suggested music puts self "under" influence of others.
As for message (Latin mitto; to send)...nature sends perceivable towards each ones perception. Any suggested message by others tempts one to ignore that.
music
Nature implies moving sound (Latin sanus; entire) for each partial instrument (instructed mind) within. Suggested music (Greek mousikē ; technē; art, of the Muses) tempts one to ignore natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested).
actually believe that there are powers in music
Choosing to believe anything suggested by others implies "reaction", being implies reaction (perception) within action (perceivable).
To believe implies ones consent to the suggested artifice by others, hence permitting others the power of ones consent to shape music into harmony (harm to one) or symphony (composition of instruments aka collectivism).
Nature (whole) sets itself apart (partials)...those within tempt each other together.
powers in music that are almost supernatural
It's ones willing ignorance of natural (sound) for artificial (music), that puts oneself "under" others, hence viewing the suggested as "super" (above).
Same trick with "understanding" aka consenting to "stand under" the suggestions of another, which tempts one to ignore growing self.
manipulate people with music
a) perceivable sound implies auto (automatic; in motion); while suggested music implies manual (by hand; tempting one to hold onto it)
b) suggested pluralism (people) tempts perceiving singular (person) to ignore self, hence lacking self discernment about being "insane" (in sanus; within sound) "person" (per sonos; by sound).
back-to-back sentences
Being implies within (life) origin (inception towards death), hence a back-to-back "life" sentence.
From the alchemical perspective...as solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death); alchemical transmutation of ingredients out of base implies flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death).
Transmutation of ingredients in and out of base implies "back-to-back"
Sleight of hand: "Back to life, back to reality...Back to the here and now"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TB54dZkzZOY
Music Has a Right to Children
Listening to suggested music permits others to become ones muse; which tempts ones absence of mind, hence impeding ones growth (resonance) within perceivable sound through loss (dissonance).
the faces all blanked out
a) consenting to suggested implies ones repression of self, which in return implies ones lack of expression, hence being a blank state.
Sleight of hand: "express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPL_qGqSJxA
b) Face (Latin facis; appearance; form)...form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies expression of growth within impressing loss.
cover with the faces all blanked out...would you make that your debut album?
Debut implies making the first stroke aka marking something and suggesting that under cover of a blank state, to those willingly ignoring perceivable, for wanting to be marked by suggested...that's gonna leave an impact.
What kind of person would?
A person (singular) influencing people (plural), hence collectivizing others, while setting ones own kind apart.
Funny how the characters in that show are supposed to be "cool", and they are anything but in real life.
"We're all alright...We're all alright"
It's going to HAPPEN. Only question is when, and when it HAPPENS, what else HAPPENS?
HAP'PEN, verb - "to come by chance"...casting out chance three times in a row implies gambling aka squandering choice by game.
- SUD'DEN, adjective (Latin subitaneus) - "happening without previous notice".
How does one notice? By perception. What exists before ones perception? All Perceivable. Who suggests HAPPEN (to come by chance; to come without one's previous expectation) as to tempt one to ignore perceivable origin? Who nose...
- SPIN, verb - "to draw out"
Velocity (inception towards death) draws out resistance (life) internally, hence an OFF-spring being born INTO the world.
suddenly spinning faster
Get yourself a dreidel; give it a spin and as soon as it suddenly starts to spin faster...well; you'll find out eventually.
Ayh inherently trust
Choice implies inherently within self...choosing to trust implies forfeit self to another.
the media
Choice implies media (Latin medius; middle) of balance; choosing from a suggested media imbalances ones choice.
Skinemax is Koyaanisqatsi (life out of balance) for a generation raised on late night television and B-movie VHS tapes. It's long form entertainment for short attention spans. An hour long VJ odyssey, it will move your body and warp your mind. A nostalgic look back at a half remembered childhood growing up in the 80s and early 90s, Skinemax takes a close look at the culture of that era. The images that motivated, delighted, and terrified us on the silver screen, set to propulsive modern music that pines for a simpler time.
Resisting the temptation to watch "life out of balance"...grows ones resistance within balance.
a) Nature offers for free aka all offered balance (action) towards each ones free will of choice (reaction)...those within nature sell imbalance for the price of ones consent.
b) Natural law (order) generates illegal (disorder) aka ongoing order (inception towards death) generating temporary disorder (life), hence each ones struggle to sustain self momentarily aka within the momentum of motion aka within perceivable moment.
c) Others suggest "allow", and if one consents to it, hence submitting self to another, then one ignores being LOW (perception) within ALL (perceivable).
All (inception towards death) generates LOW (life) aka ongoing loss generating temporary growth.
Another word for allow is "permission" aka Latin per (by) mitto (send) aka life being send from inception towards death by motion.
d) Poison (suggested information) requires a vector (ones consent, belief; faith etc.) to become injurious to life. Others suggest words (fiction) over perceivable sound (reality); hence spitting venom.
tl; dr...consider inversion aka food for poison; laws for crime; spread for store; free for price; natural for artificial; reality for fiction; perceivable for suggested; need for want etc.