1
nothingberg 1 point ago +1 / -0

All your BASED are belong to us, silly g0y1m

teee heee <poof, magick j-let disappears>

5
nothingberg 5 points ago +5 / -0

Btw, don't confuse the two naomis. Naomi Wolf = she redpilled herself and got to the right side of things...now she, a leftist, is on War room with steve bannon giving daily updates to vaccine dealths and injuries....and the legal work her group is doing to advocate for the vax injured...she could be a spook select also, I'm not saying that. But her work recently suggests she's broken free from them...but who knows. I know she's not trash like the other naomi

4
nothingberg 4 points ago +5 / -1

She's just such a trash--read the part of her defense of George W Bush's invasion of Iraq. YEAH. That part.

She started out as a brand whore, but her mom had a stroke and she went to some fancy girl engineering school where she was--I BELIEVE--targetted, picked out of the crowd and groomed as a CIA. Of course she's canadian, so this would be the CSIS but it's still the same thing. She was a selectwoman of the spooks, and made into a mouthpiece.

Same with Jordan Peterson and all these other people who go from nothinghood to somethinghood overnight...they get the spook booster chair in the media, and then they become a player

2
nothingberg 2 points ago +2 / -0

hmmm it's much better at 1.7x. I sometimes forget that since I watch my videos at that speed ('video speed controller' -- chrome / brave_)

2
nothingberg 2 points ago +2 / -0

make growing poppies in USA legal

then we outcompete afghanistan and cause them to have to figure out how to do something else in the world

all their decades of growing drugs has not brought them into the first world, and therefore, we should stop 'helping'

because it's not 'helping'

They'll figure it out. If you can grow poppies, you can grow organic pistacios or genetically engineered superwatermelons.

3
nothingberg 3 points ago +3 / -0

Greatness examples

(Justice stole this concept of the above in their video DVNO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiDsLRQg_g4)

(original turbo is GREAT but req age verification....WHY???)

1
nothingberg 1 point ago +1 / -0

How exactly was it "zogged"? I thought it was conquered by romans, then by normans, then by germans

1
nothingberg 1 point ago +1 / -0

People in america who chime in on this issue need to review "adverse possession" and 'grandfathering'

1
nothingberg 1 point ago +1 / -0

We should just have Hamas throw grenades into planned parenthood open windows instead. We can have harlem globetrotters help them work on their aim, and make the nets look like big leftist vaginas, for the practice

1
nothingberg 1 point ago +1 / -0

I assume you're using windows. I would stop doing that and use linux instead. Recommend mint for newcomers. It's nice. Then after 3 yrs use endeavour OS. It's sublime.

1
nothingberg 1 point ago +1 / -0

What a faggy substack shitpost by a nobody. Make a poll and don't open it up to anyone who isn't logged in.

2
nothingberg 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's not the legal definition of fraud.

That's the legal definition of every politician that ever existed, my man.

Stop fighting the world and start understanding it.

3
nothingberg 3 points ago +3 / -0

The account is a hybrid of some generated trash that tries to (sometimes failing) decode the etymology of select words the bot decides have some kind of heuristic uniqueness in the text it's responding to...and sometimes a person will jack-in and reply normally from that account.

If anything, this account is doing US a favor, by showing us how large bot farms work; they are a legion of sockpuppet accounts generating various levels responses on a spectrum from trash to something ho hum but never insightful; and how in these accounts, an account operator can hijack the account temporarily and make responses like a person.

4
nothingberg 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is why I support Monero, Dero and other privacy crytpocurrencies

They are vulnerable to the same forces I put in the title, but the powers that can actually block these things won't know you're using it, or why, who you're transacting with....this takes away their justification to marshall and use those forces against you.

Some NSA guy can't go to his superior and say, 'yeah we need to block this one guy that we don't like because he's saying things we don't like about Biden....and he may or may not be possibly using a privacy cryptocurrency, but he might not be...we really can't be sure....but we need to shut down the whole neighborhood on the off chance he's maybe using a monero'

That will not fly

Bitcoin however, they know you have it and how much and who you're sending it to. They can match your IP packets; they can mine your internet activity for usernames and accounts on CEXes you bought the bitcoin from....they know the wallet address on those sites because you assume due to SEC regulations and anti money laundering laws that they have direct access to the owner information of the accountholders....

1
nothingberg 1 point ago +2 / -1

OP doesn't understand the "no [covid] virus" hypothesis

So I'll explain. I think there is confusion here that some are different camps

  • camp A: is in the 'covid virus didn't exist except on paper (in silico -- genome published but virus didn't exist)' versus
  • camp B: covid and AIDS don't exist, probably others don't exist
  • camp C: no viruses exist...terrain theory and/or exosome theory and/or other

camp C is the flat earth of virus camps

camp B has some evidence to support both claim 1 and claim 2, but it's very controversial, even 30 yrs later.

I'm on the fence with camp A. I personally requested that the NIH provide me a copy (viral copy) of the covid virus, and they ignored me. Then I FOIA'd the NIAID at NIH and they ignored, which is illegal. I got a boilerplate, trite response from Dr Fauci himself, saying basically, "I am / we are, FAR too busy to respond to your request". It was extremely arrogant and dismissive.

I could only conclude they were lying. My foia wasn't for a copy of the virus but for a confirmation that the article they published with a 'so called image of the covid virus (by electron microscopy) was in fact covid and not HIV or some other virus. Because I reverse imaged searched and that image was a STOCK PHOTO that existed since before 2014, hence it could not possibly be covid. I knew the answer, however, I wanted them to SAY IT. And they refused.

Our government fucking sucks and that is exhibit A

view more: Next ›