Ones consent to suggested pluralism (they) implies conflation (melting together), while ignoring being partial (perception) divorced (separated by dissolution) within whole (perceivable).
Separated (life) by dissolution (inception towards death).
Who knows?
a) Reasoning (yes vs no) about suggested tempts one to ignore KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
b) Each one knows (perceives) all (perceivable)...unless ignored for the suggestions by one another.
your money has been seized
Ones consent to suggested "money" permits others ownership over M_ONE_Y aka MY ONE, hence money representing a suggested ownership transfer of oneself to another...willingly; consensual through bank & TRUST.
Ones consent to suggested pluralism (they) implies conflation (melting together), while ignoring being partial (perception) divorced (separated by dissolution) within whole (perceivable).
Separated (life) by dissolution (inception towards death).
a) Reasoning (yes vs no) about suggested tempts one to ignore KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
b) Each one knows (perceives) all (perceivable)...unless ignored for the suggestions by one another.
Ones consent to suggested "money" permits others ownership over M_ONE_Y aka MY ONE, hence money representing a suggested ownership transfer of oneself to another...willingly; consensual through bank & TRUST.
What are you on?