The mistake most made by members of this community are the use of the words: always, all, every
Secondly, a lack of qualifiers in such expansive statements, because life is messy and there are often exceptions, even if, as the saying goes, "exceptions prove the rule."
Example 1: All swans are white. Response: If I can fine but one black swan, then your assertion, really a hypothesis, has been nullified, or is wrong. Say, your average swan is white.
Example 2: All elections are rigged.
Response: This means that you are saying every election is rigged. Do you really think that the non-partisan off year election for your local community college or library board is rigged? Maybe, but that's fucking moronic. Rather, you should say "all important elections are rigged".
Example 3: All Jews are evil.
Response: All Jews today, or all Jews throughout all of time? Joseph and Mary weren't evil, therefore, your assertion is wrong. Rather, say "modern Judaism is evil as practiced."
We'll go over the ecological fallacy next, which the the second biggest logic mistake made.
a) sound implies perceivable offer...choosing suggested words implies mistake aka taking suggested, while missing perceivable.
b) taking any word aka consenting to any suggested definition (definite; fixed), while being (life) within motion (inception towards death); will tempt one into conflicts of reason (correct vs incorrect; belief vs disbelief; good vs bad etc.).
Logic/Logos equals reason...words equal conflict.
Example...EVIL=LIVE. How could reasoning dissolve that inherent contradiction?
Tempts one to ignore being (life) within way (inception towards death) of all (motion).
Tempts one to ignore being one (partial) within all (whole).
Tempts one to ignore each one within everything (all).