So, you wanna pretend the world would be just as evil and horrific without (((them)))

a) want vs not want implies reasoning. A tool to divide many against each other over suggestions by few.

b) good vs evil...reasoning based on ones consent to suggested moralism. A tool to gain consensual control over manner aka over ones free will of choice.

c) "without" implies a suggested inversion of being within (life) outside (inception towards death).

d) suggested terrorism (horror) tempts one to be afraid of suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin.

e) suggested pluralism (them) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore self for others.

f) suggested (fiction) is utilized to pretend perceivable (reality)...a deceptive appearance if one consents to it.

tl; dr...exploitation of many by few implies a natural reaction to prevent accumulation of mass. Solids (life) within fluid (inception towards death) are being set apart from one another, while tempting each other back together.