0
LeoLittlebook 0 points ago +1 / -1

Libertarians are irrelevant at this population density. They're Stress Tolerators, Oranguthals. Voting legitimizes the intrinsically illegitimate. Expatriation is the answer Lot forgot.

0
LeoLittlebook 0 points ago +1 / -1

Repuglycans are repugnant rampaging werewolves blowing up the world over primitive concepts of honor and/or internal political cycles, while advocating callous social darwinism and capital punishment at home. They justify this by correctly pointing out that the Commies are worse, which doesn't make them good, which is why the Commies inevitably get their turn. Mostly because Repuglycans are too stupid to cohere over Y-DNA instead of ideology, which is easily faked.

Proper civilizations minimize bloodshed and poverty, and use capital criminals for medical experimentation and hazardous labor instead of executing them.

I suspect you can figure out the others yourself.

1
LeoLittlebook 1 point ago +1 / -0

High IQ people have larger active vocabularies, which includes inventing and using neologisms. Hope this helps you understand the chart.

1
LeoLittlebook 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're a liar. There is one headline here about Hitler, and the essay doesn't support him. Previous issues rarely mention Hitler. You are a monomaniac reacting to your trigger word.

In classical and medieval literature, ultima Thule (Latin "farthest Thule") acquired a metaphorical meaning of any distant place located beyond the "borders of the known world".

This news series is named "Thule" in honor of its esoteric subject matter and my I1 Nordic clade. I1 is found mostly in Scandinavia and Finland, not Germany. The Thule Society named itself after us, just as the Nazis took the swastika from India.

Hitler's y-DNA was E1b1b and since it is y-DNA, it has to also have been the y-DNA of his unknown grandfather. E1b1b is known as the “Berber marker” which comes from North Africa. Around 18% of Ashkenazi Jews carry it.

1
LeoLittlebook 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thule means "of, relating to, or being the culture existing in the arctic lands from Alaska to Greenland from about a.d. 500 to a.d. 1400", you ponderous twit. It refers in my use to the I1 Nordic clade. Please sperg elsewhere.

1
LeoLittlebook 1 point ago +1 / -0

you> But it doesn't follow that lack of salts leads to diarrhea. You can't switch cause for effect like that, it's nonsensical.

Sieges cause dysentery, moron.

Dysentery (blood and pus in faeces) has been an epidemic disease in armies throughout history.
War-Related Dysentery Epidemics in the Australian Army | JMVH

The cause of dysentery is usually the bacteria from genus Shigella, in which case it is known as shigellosis, or the amoeba Entamoeba histolytica; then it is called amoebiasis.[1] Other causes may include certain chemicals, other bacteria, other protozoa, or parasitic worms.[2] It may spread between people.[4] Risk factors include contamination of food and water with feces due to poor sanitation.[5]
Dysentery | Wikipedia

So it's half

No, more than.

Again, an adult needs more than 10 times that. This is not sustainable.

Another naked assertion, conveniently without any specific falsifiable prediction. Because you know you don't know what you're talking about.

1
LeoLittlebook 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, you added a quote about rabbit starvation to a scenario where it did not apply, stupidly.

Dysentery is normal during a siege with suboptimal nutrition and sanitation. It kills especially quickly without salt. I do not recommend trying ultra-low fat with terrestrial protein sources anyway, so the scenario is irrelevant. Saltwater shrimp fat can be safely consumed after light cooking, and is one of the most healthy complete fat sources available today.

you> Dysentery has nothing to do with salt nor does diarrhea.

Another spectacularly stupid statement that can get you killed. See oral rehydration salts.

While both foods are low-fat, shrimp contains over two times more fat. Shrimp provide less than 2g of fat per 100g serving. Shrimp also have a fat profile that is preferable to scallops, which contain predominantly polyunsaturated fats, such as omega-3 fatty acids.
Shrimp vs. Scallop | FoodStruct

I will check agains the FDA: shrimp is 1.7% fat; scallops has .49%. So I understated the ratio; shrimp has 3.5x more (and better) fat than scallops.

Hm, there is considerable variance here though:

My method of cooking loses no fat; grilled shrimp would not work. I avoid farm-raised shrimp, whose fat is much lower-quality. The worse the ingredients, the more food one needs.

1
LeoLittlebook 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's a limit on how low on fat you can get before getting malnutrition.

I'm well aware. This method does not work with scallops, which have less than half the fat of shrimp.

If you can't research the science behind that claim on your own there's no saving you.

I've been doing this for years and don't require saving from your ignorance, which would leave me still sick.

Soldiers dying of dysentery during a siege is normal, stupid. They had no salt.

The second quote is about rabbit starvation, which you are still too stupid to comprehend is caused by a no-carb carnivore diet.

The diet does not cause diarrhea; it stops it. That is the whole reason I use it.

Basically, the opposition to this diet is coming from dogmatic midwits who can't reason their way out of a wet paper bag.

1
LeoLittlebook 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are welcome to explain how it is either of those things.

1
LeoLittlebook 1 point ago +1 / -0

The link you gave literally states what I was saying

Clearly you are logically impaired. The quote states:

diet deficient in fat and carbohydrates

If it were or, you would be correct.

Icebound Inuits consume no starches, which is one viable extreme. The other extreme is my method, which consumes minimal fat. Both are viable. One does not rabbit starve if one has carbs, because rabbit starvation only occurs when "almost all bioavailable calories come from the protein in lean meat."

Your claim on the amount of fat necessary to live is unsupported and false.

2
LeoLittlebook 2 points ago +2 / -0

You'll need to eat a shit ton of shrimp a day to not suffer malnutrition in the long run.

False. I eat about 1 kg of frozen shelled shrimp every two weeks, which is about 70 grams per day. I eat two handfuls of rice for every one handful of shrimp. The cost for organic shrimp is about 17 USD per 2 weeks. You do not know what you are talking about

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein_poisoning

Protein is limited to about 1/3 of energy, but there is no such thing as carb poisoning. Thus one may get most of the rest from carbs.

Why not just use animal fat or olive oil

Fat is harder to digest and carries fat-soluble toxins. Concentrated plant fats were not part of the ancestral diet. There is no such thing as hypoallergenic fat. Thus it is completely unsuitable for an elimination diet.

Storing carbs to survive the winter is something even squirrels do; humans certainly did so.

I doubt the cardiovascular healthiness of high-fat "paleo" diets for non-Inuits; see psychologist Seth Rich's death from (probably) butter overconsumption.

1
LeoLittlebook 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no need to replace fat or proteins; both exist in shrimp. The issue is that eating only shelled shrimp would probably result in rabbit starvation. The solution is carbs from rice.

1
LeoLittlebook 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because they have no carbs. Carbs and fat are interchangeable for calories.

0
LeoLittlebook 0 points ago +1 / -1

I do not accept Judaeo-Communist linguistic revisions, or lying accusers.

1
LeoLittlebook 1 point ago +1 / -0

It won't be reciprocated yet, so break it down to patriarchal clans instead.

0
LeoLittlebook 0 points ago +1 / -1

Well, I suppose it doesn't matter whether you're crazy or boring.

0
LeoLittlebook 0 points ago +1 / -1

I looked over your account and reckon you're not schizophrenic, just an Illuminati deliberately obfuscating his meaning.

view more: Next ›