incredible...to be
Being "in credit" to whom?
CREDIT, noun - "reputation derived from the confidence of others; belief; faith; a reliance or resting of the mind on the truth of something said or done; in commerce, a trust; transfer of goods in confidence of future payment".
Who is the debtor to your credit?
So much is being EXPOSED
a) Exposed implies "expression of position"...consenting to "so much exposed information" suggested by another tempts one to repress ones position, hence burdening self with so much exposure to others.
b) EX (out of; from) implies origin of being aka that which impresses (inception towards death) expressions (life). One can only discern this for self if one resists exposure to others.
c) Nature offers ALL (perceivable) to each ONE (perception) at any moment...others suggest less vs much reasoning to distract from that.
Nothing will happen
Nothing (Latin nihilo) implies suggested nihil-ism tempting ones consent to de-nial perceivable. Few suggest happenstance to tempt ones will to consent to denial of perceivable for suggested.
Everything (perceivable) can be denied for nothing (suggested)...if one WILLS it.
In that line of thinking; consider FIAT - "authoritative sanction; let it be done"...jews suggest fiction as fiat currency to tempt gentiles to authorize it by willingly consenting to denial perceivable reality aka natural current.
Suggestion implies fiat for perception.
point of it all
All (inception towards death) generates ones (life)...others suggest point (end of sentence) to tempt one to ignore self (life sentence).
Any point implies suggested progressivism tempting ones mind to focus on outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin of thought.
everyone we've sold to you is a degenerate
a) Buying (consent) into what others are selling (suggestion) establishes a division (reason) within generation (perceivable) aka de-generation.
b) Being implies reactor (life) within generator (inception towards death)...buying into anything else destabilizes reactors during generation. If reactor ignores generation; then less re-generation.
c) Suggested pluralism (every one) inverts perceivable singularity (each one)...if one consents to it.
Do as though wilt
a) WILL implies WANT, which exists as expression (want) within impression (need).
b) If one ignores need (perceivable) for want (suggested); then...THOUGH, verb - "grant; admit; allow"...one permits another to will suggested for one.
Ones choice grants chosen ones permission.
c) Being implies RE (life) within DO (inception towards death) aka responding to being done by. So if one does as though wilt another, then one ignores to redo self, while permitting others to redo; renovate; to do over again etc.
eclipse theory
Eclipse implies obscuration...the'ory (theism) implies the suggested temptation for one to obscure self by consenting to another.
Suggestion (information) eclipses perception (inspiration)...if consented to.
grid going down
Suggested grid (network of transmission lines) tempts one to ignore perceivable...being (life) transmitted within line (inception towards death) of work (energy). Consenting to the suggestions by others interweaves thoughts into a NET; like for example the world wide web; a network interwoven by many who permit few to pull strings aka to pull at the fabric of life.
Only if many hold onto the net; can few switch the network on/off.
yes and no
Aka consenting (yes) to suggested, while denying (no) perceivable; which establishes a conjunction (and) in-between buyer (ones choice of consent) and seller (chosen ones suggestion).
exactly
EX (expression) ACT (action) implies ones expressed reaction (life) within all impressing action (inception towards death)...reasoning (yes vs no) tempts one to ignore that.
a) Suggested cloning (genetically identical) tempts one to ignore genetic (all perceivable) differentiation (ones perception).
b) Perceivable reality implies singular...ignoring it for suggested establishes a double-thinking within oneself.
c) Utilizing suggestion to tempt ignorance of perceivable implies DUPE, verb - "to deceive; to trick; to mislead by imposing on ones credulity".
When do jews go after...
Going after implies following others...that's what goyim choose to do.
cost of money
a) COST aka CO (together; with) STARE (to stand)...that's what goyim choose to do. Meanwhile... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
b) COST (phonetic caust) - "corrosive; burning", hence WHOLE/HOLO (inception towards death) + COST/CAUST (life).
Sleight of hand for the cost of money...Mr. BURNS.
c) If M-ONE-Y (my one); then why pay for what's already mine? Then again...that's what goyim choose to do.
Put... in it and make it...
a) Alchemical transmutation.
b) Ones choice consenting to chosen ones suggestion permits alchemical transmutation within oneself by another.
a) Consenting to any suggested -ism establishes a schizo/schism called "reason" aka a division into two within one.
b) Consenting to anything suggested eclipses (dark) perceivable (light). Ignorance implies obscuration of light (discernment) within self.
a) Emptying ones mind of suggested (information) allows filling ones mind with perceivable (inspiration). The issue...emptying implies letting go of; while filling implies discerning to be partial within whole, hence already having full-access (all perceivable), while wielding limited capacity (ones perception).
b) Master/Magis/More/Magic...artificial influence. Consenting to such a suggestion shapes one into a slave. Meanwhile...being implies within (life) natural fluid (inception towards death).
From a different perspective...there can be no more than ONE (whole) except other ONES (partials). The artificial influence suggests one to count other ones as...more or less than.
what makes it so difficult to deal with is the general public ignorance...
The deal was made (want over need)...ignorance is the price payed.
The term 'Kabbalah' is derived from the Hebrew word 'kabbalah', which means 'to receive'....this tradition is deeply rooted in a collection of esoteric teachings...
How could one collect ESO (interior) without receiving from EXO (exterior) first? What if collecting suggested information tempts one to ignore receiving perceivable inspiration?
ideology they also created
- Idealism (ideo)
- Logism (logy)
- Theism (they)
- Dualism (also aka alike aka similarity)
- Creationism (created)
a) Impression (inception towards death) generates expression (life), hence being within implying pressurization.
b) Suggested system (assemblage of things adjusted into a regular whole) tempts one to ignore that whole separates self into partials, hence oneself being a partial (perception) within whole (perceivable).
c) Suggested vaccum (empty space) tempts one to ignore being partial within whole/full/fill, since only within whole can a partial wander (Latin spatior; space) around.
d) Matter can only be within momentum of motion...a "vaccum" without matter cannot be, unless being ignores momentum of motion.
Demo (plural) demotes being (singular)...only nature promotes being. Pro-mote implies forward (inception towards death) particle (life).
If singular being consents to suggested "demos"; then strength (kratos) of many (demos) is given to suggesting few as absolute power over many, hence a tyranny.
fall of humanity
Rise of humanity (life) within fall (inception toward death)...
Nothing lasts
L'AST, adjective - "that follows all the others"...everything implies moving origin for each one within. Others suggest one to follow along suggested nothing (Latin nihilo...as in...nihil-ism and de-nial); which then implies that "nothing lasts".
democracies fail
Demos (people) Kratos (strength)...person (singular) wields strength; people (plural) implies submission of person to those who aggregate; collectivize; uni-form etc.
In short...nature sets apart; those within tempt each other together, so that nature breaks apart all those holding together, which in return permits a few to remain apart from a continuously breaking apart many.
representative
Responding to presented implies as free will of choice...ignoring ones choice for a chosen ones "representation" implies submission of self to another, hence many being tempted to submit to few when seeking representation.
MONO (inception towards death) ARCH (life)...many arcs (growth) one monad (loss). Few tempt many to bow; which in return diminishes arcs.
...-ism is usually treated with...
a) Consenting to any suggested -ism implies a mistreatment of ones mind.
b) TREAT, verb (Latin tracto) - "to handle; to manage; to use; to negotiate; to settle; to entertain without expense to the guest".
Nature handles; manages and uses everything within. Nature isn't negotiable for those within. Being within nature implies an agitated position; not a settled one, and every guest (life) within nature (inception towards death) pays the cost of life.
know about things before they happened
a) Few suggest happenstance (chance aka effect of an unknown cause) to distract many from discerning to be effect (perception) within known cause (perceivable).
b) If many reddit (read-it); then few know beforehand what many can read.
c) Prove implies "to ascertain some unknown quality"...once again...perceivable implies known value; and ones perception the evaluation thereof.
Few suggest unknown qualities; to tempt many to evaluate suggested (fiction) over perceivable (reality). If one consents to a suggested quality; then one permits those suggesting it to define; redefine and contradict quality at will.
neurowarfare
a) NEURON (sinew; to bind)...hence neurology...bound by reason (logic) and words (logos). Each conflict of reason implies neuro-war-fare, and ones consent to the suggestions by others implies the "fare" payed.
b) NERVE (tendon; to stretch) implies drawing out (life) to full length (inception towards death).
c) Look at antonyms for neural...decompressed; unbend; collected; easy-going; focused.
Compression implies ones comprehension; bending implies as rise within fall; being implies set apart from one another; living within process of dying implies the hard knock life, and focusing on suggested tempts one to lose sight within perceivable.
weaponizing reality
There can be only one weapon within reality...each ones weapon of choice. Choosing to consent to the suggested choices by others; disarms self, while permitting "chosen ones" to wield ones weapon of choice.
- Ones choice within all perceivable implies reality
- Ones choice underneath another ones choice implies fiction
these parties start off with a big game of limbo
a) LIM'BO, noun (Latin limbus) - "a region bordering on hell, or hell itself"
b) Limb/limit implies border/edge aka anything tempting center (free will of choice) off balance.
c) Heaven/heave - "to breathe; to lift; to raise; to move upward" + Hell/heel - " to incline; to lean"
- Heaven...choice growing within balance (need/want) aka growing resistance by resisting temptation.
- Hell...choice falling for imbalance (want vs not want) aka center inclining towards extremities.
the way they were grabbing with their hands and just spitting out things they don't like...
Aka wanting vs not wanting suggested (appetite)...while ignoring perceivable need (hunger)
a slow drip is better than a flood
a) Slow drip (life) within flood (inception towards death).
b) Better aka bet (a wager)...wanting to wage distracts one from needing to toil.
- MON'STER, noun (Latin monstro, to show) + SHOW, verb - "to exhibit or present to the view of others"
Perception implies ones sight; suggestion implies shown to sight (side-show) by others.
The collapse of...
a) Francis Scott aka SCOT FREE
- https://www.etymonline.com/word/Francis#etymonline_v_11869
- https://www.etymonline.com/word/Scot
- https://www.etymonline.com/word/scot-free
b) Baltimore aka ADDITIONAL WHITE
original language
Language implies expression; origin implies impression.
Want definitely consumes
a) Need moves; want tempts one to hold onto affixed (definite). Whatever one wants to hold onto...one needs to move.
b) Hunger consumes; food fuels hunger.
c) Hunger implies enforced need; appetite implies wanted temptation. The former forces itself through one; the latter draws one outward.
d) Resisting hunger grows resistance; fueling appetite grows temptation...temptation reduces resistance.
some if not many
a) if/then implies everything moving, and each one being (life) moved (inception towards death) within...suggested nothing (not) tempts one to ignore/de-nial (Latin nihilo, nothing) motion.
Example...confirming what another suggests with YES tempts one to hold onto; while defending it with NO aka with denying that the wanted suggestion needs to change within perceivable.
b) SOME, adjective - "noting a certain quantity of a thing, but indeterminate; a portion greater or less"...notice that ONEself can be greater or less, while remaining ONE. Next notice that inception towards death is always greater than the lesser life within...living (growth) cannot outgrow dying (loss).
Other ones (chosen ones) tempt one to count quantities above and below one to distract ONE from self, with any suggested NOTE; noun - "a mark or token; something by which a thing may be known; a visible sign" as the distraction.
NOTice also that NOTe includes NOT aka nihilo; nothing...
c) Instead of suggested pluralism (many)...discern perceivable singular (man; manus; manual). Suggestion tempting consent implies a "manual override", and ride implies automatic (inception towards death) for each manual (life) within.
Perception implies automatic; suggestion implies manual...perceivable doesn't require ones consent (it forces ones adaptation); suggested tempts ones consent.
What if consumption (inception towards death) generates nourishment/fuel (life)? In other words...what if one doesn't need food; what if need consumes one?
"Artifice of reason" to distract from "nature of implication".
Partial implies sentence (life); entire implies beginning (inception) and end (death) of sentence...others suggest POINT (end of sentence) to distract.
From a different perspective...how to apply compass and square without a "fixed" point? What if ones consent "affixes" suggested compass within square?
What if...COM (together; with) PASS (alter; change; passion; suffer/undergo) tempts one to ignore being within a SQUARE (left/right; front/back; up/down)?
Look into "squaring the circle/circling the square"...