What if consumption (inception towards death) generates nourishment/fuel (life)? In other words...what if one doesn't need food; what if need consumes one?
a) if/then implies everything moving, and each one being (life) moved (inception towards death) within...suggested nothing (not) tempts one to ignore/de-nial (Latin nihilo, nothing) motion.
Example...confirming what another suggests with YES tempts one to hold onto; while defending it with NO aka with denying that the wanted suggestion needs to change within perceivable.
b) SOME, adjective - "noting a certain quantity of a thing, but indeterminate; a portion greater or less"...notice that ONEself can be greater or less, while remaining ONE. Next notice that inception towards death is always greater than the lesser life within...living (growth) cannot outgrow dying (loss).
Other ones (chosen ones) tempt one to count quantities above and below one to distract ONE from self, with any suggested NOTE; noun - "a mark or token; something by which a thing may be known; a visible sign" as the distraction.
NOTice also that NOTe includes NOT aka nihilo; nothing...
c) Instead of suggested pluralism (many)...discern perceivable singular (man; manus; manual). Suggestion tempting consent implies a "manual override", and ride implies automatic (inception towards death) for each manual (life) within.
What if consumption (inception towards death) generates nourishment/fuel (life)? In other words...what if one doesn't need food; what if need consumes one?
Want definitely consumes some if not many
a) Need moves; want tempts one to hold onto affixed (definite). Whatever one wants to hold onto...one needs to move.
b) Hunger consumes; food fuels hunger.
c) Hunger implies enforced need; appetite implies wanted temptation. The former forces itself through one; the latter draws one outward.
d) Resisting hunger grows resistance; fueling appetite grows temptation...temptation reduces resistance.
a) if/then implies everything moving, and each one being (life) moved (inception towards death) within...suggested nothing (not) tempts one to ignore/de-nial (Latin nihilo, nothing) motion.
Example...confirming what another suggests with YES tempts one to hold onto; while defending it with NO aka with denying that the wanted suggestion needs to change within perceivable.
b) SOME, adjective - "noting a certain quantity of a thing, but indeterminate; a portion greater or less"...notice that ONEself can be greater or less, while remaining ONE. Next notice that inception towards death is always greater than the lesser life within...living (growth) cannot outgrow dying (loss).
Other ones (chosen ones) tempt one to count quantities above and below one to distract ONE from self, with any suggested NOTE; noun - "a mark or token; something by which a thing may be known; a visible sign" as the distraction.
NOTice also that NOTe includes NOT aka nihilo; nothing...
c) Instead of suggested pluralism (many)...discern perceivable singular (man; manus; manual). Suggestion tempting consent implies a "manual override", and ride implies automatic (inception towards death) for each manual (life) within.
Perception implies automatic; suggestion implies manual...perceivable doesn't require ones consent (it forces ones adaptation); suggested tempts ones consent.