1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

But you don't. and you know it. It's just a comparison, of bombs used between two years in one country.

Why must I continue to repeat myself?

You must be controlled opposition, for the purposes of generating engagement on a failing social media network for the purposes of gathering analytics and add revenue.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

I asked for lists, and statistics, you keep giving me articles on bombs used in Afghanistan, during a one year period.

Congratulations! I think you are getting enough soybean in your diet. So, there is that.

emperor trump.

Your words, not mine.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Seafood restaurant? Sure, why not?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

2 articles, about the use of bombs in 2 years, with 2 presidents in 1 country.

You think those are statistics?

That is the very definition of cherry picking.

" I doubt a list will change your mind".

So give us the list then.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can find the truth just fine.

Which is clearly why you chose not to show us the list.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sShMA85pv8M&t=180s

Reminder. Did I ask you a Question?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

I doubt a list will change your mind.

Give us the fucking list.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

I found one set of numbers, comparing 2017 to 2016, in Afghanistan. Specifically bombs, and no mention of other tactics or uses of force. You know it's 2024 now. And that's not the only country the U.S military is deployed to.

Can you find any actual statistics, or just shitty articles? Grandma.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought you knew how to navigate the Internet or use a search engine.

This is the comment you replied to:

Honestly. I went looking before asking my question. All the search engines are colluding, returning exact same results, and making it hard to find any information of value.The only reason I asked, was because I was unable to find statistics on my own.

I'm not going to pretend that you are playing dumb. Clearly, you are not playing dumb.

Now give me statistical comparisons between presidents, or shut the fuck up.

Just look up "trump bombings"

???

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yet you can't link me to this? in fact the only thing I get from that search is an article from CNN written in April of 2017,

Wow. You are a fucking liar.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honestly. I went looking before asking my question. All the search engines are colluding, returning exact same results, and making it hard to find any information of value.

The only reason I asked, was because I was unable to find statistics on my own.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Everything you post is easily disproved talking points. None of it is legitimate.

Even your posts with some legitimacy is focusing on the wrong facts.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Judging my the disparity with the responses I am receiving, I can't help but feel that I am expressing myself poorly.

Thanks for entertaining my Questions none the less.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am just asking you to observe the moon when you get a chance. And to Question everything.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is direction of light source. As stated before, move your light source to the front of the ball.

I am uncertain why you think paths around the Earth, length of cycle, or the equator is relevant.

Simply imagine a line from the sun to the moon in the sky. That is how the light should behave and reflect from the sphere that is the moon.

Did you not review the video in the link? The refection causes a hot spot, as in the above image, and not a crescent, as often occurs. With no interference from the Earths shadow.

0
Questionable 0 points ago +5 / -5

Do you have a list of Trump's military actions? How about a list of his illegal wars?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the light in coming from the front, the face should be illuminated and round, if not full. Like so:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uw4sRNYlB4s

And not a crescent.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

That would explain how amazingly "high quality" the textures and lighting on this render were.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca-e5MrVbVU

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Follow up Questions;

  • Have you seen a crescent moon in the sky at sunrise?
  • Have you viewed the moon at sunset?
1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

And if we were 2 dimensional beings, I would have to relent.

So am I to assume, you did not render the earlier image?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course. Position is relevant, when you cite it, but not me. The sun is Schrodinger's light source.

And for some reason you are bringing up the equator, when I was not discussing it at at all?

And I am now realizing that you are not u/MindlessRationality.

Which explains why your hollow argument doesn't match up with his.

In fact, neither of you have addressed a single thing I have said.

Why is that?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Amazing. Now put the light source in front of the sphere, and not behind it. While accomplish the same effect.

https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/17sOxE5QtV/not-reflecting/c/4Z8k2php6We

Do I have to explain to you that sun does not rise behind the moon? Nor is it behind the moon at night.

Can you explain why every search engine returns composites for the terms "moon sunrise", while the moon is often visible during the day, making this a commonly photographed phenomenon?"

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Then clearly you can provide an image that gives us a crescent shaped lighting on a sphere.

https://www.google.com/search?q=shpere+rendering&tbm=isch

Take your time. Any image will do.

3
Questionable 3 points ago +4 / -1

Often times in the morning, the sun rises to the East while the moon is waxing from above to the South. Clearly, being able to see both, above the horizon, the full face of the moon should be visible, with no crescent shape.

Yet the opposite is true. And there are no computer models that allow for a crescent shape refection off of a sphere.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52489417/how-to-create-a-concave-convex-circle-illusion-in-opengl

Though, one can be seen in a concave surface.

view more: Next ›