1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. That is the way it has worked for the past 60 years. But I don't believe you are thinking.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you don't think he is being deceptive in his messaging. But you want him dead for some reason.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Again. You want to go to the end game without taking any of the steps between. Schumer doesn't want to abolish the I.R.S. Do you agree?

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

And the last I heard, 23% was mentioned.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Congratulations! I fell for it this time.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

All oils are anti-bacterial. So adding extra expensive treatments to the oil does little.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Her model relies on a flat plain. So though it might be accurate, it does not disprove a globe, as both views would be looking out into space from a curved surface.

This also doesn't allow for a reduced curvature, as seen in Crater Earth theory, but on absolutes. How do you tell an effective lie? Answer; partial truths. Similarly the truth is neither of these extremes, but somewhere in between.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

You'd have an accumulative top average at the equator. In addition, note the direction of the rays. In all models, it's from the opposite side, opposite tilt. Which is very important, as it puts the equator in the middle of the hottest rays, not the bottom, allowing that area to receive maximum sunlight.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=earth%27s+tilt+sun&iax=images&ia=images&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fletstalkscience.ca%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2Fwidth_800px%2Fpublic%2F2019-10%2FEarth_orbit_seasons.png%3Fitok%3DtOTq2qIt

This is how you know you have fallen for controlled opposition. As almost all arguments of this nature are crafted in this manner to sound correct, but are based off of a false premise and can be easily discredited.

Think on basic things, such as how star maps should be spherical. And yet how we only have one nights sky all year round. Fewer logical connections needing to be bridged, means harder to disprove, and even more importantly, harder to injected with falsehoods.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's both a reply meant to invoke an emotional response and to categorize something in a dismissive manner. It's also so far off topic it is pointless. The original premise, u/free-will-of-choice/ replies. Focusing on them will only lead to confusion and fear.

What are you going to do with this knowledge? Go rob a Bank of America? That's just the abstraction layer of our world. And to assume every company logo is related to Satan? Just read it into everything you see?

Now lets take a look at what might be happening here. This thread itself can be an aspect of an actual predictive programming campaign meant to acclimate you to what was actually a warning.

This is literally pointless. You're off on a tangent because a larper (u/free-will-of-choice/) sits on this forum and seeds chaos. And now you think simply seeing a corporate logo has filled you with profound insight. That's an emotional reaction, no better than imaging yourself as a power ranger.

Name there crimes. Don't just string words together like you are writing a fable. Name actionable threats, with known intentions. Decoding a McDonald's logo, and writing narratives for still shots of old cartoons aint going to do squat!

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

True. But there is a lot of work that needs to done first. Namely shifting the printing of currency away from the Federal Reserve and to the Treasury. Which in the short term, does mean we have to "fiddle with the code".

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Prime time doesn't mean adult. And "adult" doesn't mean Jews dating kids.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was only returning your own low brow insults at your level of intellect and discourse.

Incorrect. That's what I did, when I replied to this this post here:

https://conspiracies.win/p/16Zr0yqMrZ/x/c/4Tpzol82GtL

I mirrored it directly right down to the format and insult count.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9S580OGEJ5Y&t=33s

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which is why I said 20%. 10% income plus 10% sales. Yes, the math was really simple.

Only a man with a small dick champions an extra government tax strategy to steal more of our labor and savings.

And there you go again, making assumptions. It's as though every time you read a new reply, you have forgotten what I have already said. Following a conversation is really hard hugh?

Nothing is ever good enough is it? Everything must happen all at once. Ain't that right twitchy? You have a real ANTIFA BLM vibe going. Gotta shout down all opposition, because you have up votes! oooooo, wow! Again, tiny dick.

0
Questionable 0 points ago +1 / -1

You are voluntarily in support of EXTRA TAX.

No I did that math you moron.

So yes. You are discussing a topic you have not researched and you are supporting tyranny as a fool would.

You have tiny dick energy and big mouth. Stop being a presumptuous cunt won't you?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

That video is basically an introduction to crater Earth. Implying a massive stationary planetoid with a small habitable zone that moves slowly across the surface over the ages. Which is why we migrated to the "new world". Which would be why we would be traveling to "Mars", secretly a location here on this world.

Implied in these theories, is that they are either hiding a small land mass, or 90% of the Earth's surface, and possibly other species that inhabit those lands.

So basically, earth is like Saturn, and the black cube of Saturn, the hexagonal storm is their firmament.

view more: Next ›