1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's the same thing ppl say about taking DMT.

a) A thing cannot be the same as any other thing...only within sameness (cause) can each different thing (effect) come into being.

b) Taking ignores given...ignorance represents a hallucinogenic drug because it dries discernment.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I heard about this which is quite the trip...

Trip/trap aka entrapment...any drug/droge (to dry) entraps mental fluidity.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

This Popular Culinary Mushroom Makes People See “Little Elves”

Elf implies sprite - "a doublet of spirit"...ones consent breathes life into the suggested populism of another one; thereby establishing a doublet of spirit.

Taking anything from another...belittles one.

no psychoactive compounds

Nature implies active; being implies reactive...the animation of reaction within action implies psycho/psyche - "animating spirit".

Few suggest psycho-logy to compound the animated spirit of many together into a consensus called logic (circular thinking).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's retarded and all that means is that the current Western medical zeitgeist is wrong.

a) A current only moves...holding onto right or wrong retards ones perception of movement.

b) Geist (ghost) implies spiritual animation of essence; Zeit (time) implies the distance of essence in animation. The issue...if essence holds onto the measurement of time it ignores spiritual animation.

c) Medic/med - "to take appropriate measures"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*med-

To appropriate implies "taking into possession" while ignoring that the process of animation (inception towards death) sets potential (life) free.

The entire medicinal field is designed by few to tempt many into sacrificing potential (given) for possession (taken).

What's the opposite of medic? Patient aka being "capable of enduring misfortune, suffering, etc. without complaint"

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Judas goat & golden calf...

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

turning into human and achieving a singularity

Singularity implies delineation...turning implies putting the beginning and end of a line together to shape a circle. Nature delineates; few shape artificial circles to confine many mentally (logic) and physically (reason).

Dont get mad with the lil joke

All good.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

black people cannot be racist

Race/radix - "to radiate" implies each ray of light. Black implies the absence of light. Thanks to that contradiction...black people cannot be racist.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

anyone referring to

To refer implies "tracing back to first cause/origin" which contradicts the procession of each off-spring being brought forth from cause into effect.

abortion is murder

Murder (taking a life) contradicts abortion (miscarrying a life) because birth implies carrying being from taking (intercourse) towards giving (offspring).

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

debating

Aka reasoning.

a retarded waste of time

One cannot retard (delay) time...it's holding onto suggested measurements of time which delays ones perception while laying one to waste.

an argument they can't win

a) Win vs lose implies ones mind confined to a circle (logic); which turns into arguments against another (reason).

b) Argue; verb - "to make reasoned statements to prove or refute a proposition"...only nature proposes being; which cannot be proven or refuted without ignoring nature. Few propose artifice to tempt many into argumentation against each other while ignoring nature.

at least avoid losing

Only during loss (inception towards death) can there be growth (life)...few suggest argumentation to trick many into avoidance of natural for artificial.

Both sides of argumentation represents loss. A boxing match represents loser vs loser while permitting a 3rd party outside the ring to declare the winner.

declaring your entire position

Only within entire (cause) can each particular (effect) have a position...argumentation about position is designed to distract effect from cause.

flipping the table

Flipping logic (circular thinking) and reason (circular argumentation) doesn't get one out of circular confinement.

losing a board game.

Game implies gambling aka ignoring given choice by taking a chance.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cant serve two masters.

If choice holds onto either side it becomes a servant to two masters. Only motion > balance > choice represents master setting one free from servitude to one another.

An unstable mind is chaotic

Chaos/khaos/ghieh - "to be wide open"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*ghieh-

Only within the natural order (inception towards death) can chaos (life) come into being, hence balance (stable) generating choice (unstable). Few tempt many into imbalance by suggesting the inversion...order out of chaos instead of chaos within order.

Know your worth and purpose

Pur (forth) pose (to put) hence value (all perceivable) putting forth evaluation (each ones perception). Few tempt many with suggested value (currency) to ignore perceivable value (current)...which when held onto becomes worthless "debt/dead".

Look up not down

Nature sets up/down (balance) apart for each being in-between (choice)...choosing to look/lock onto either side imbalances a beings choice.

This is what happens if one looks up and not down... https://rainydaypoems.com/poems-for-kids/classic-poems-for-kids/the-story-of-johnny-head-in-the-air-by-heinrich-hoffman/

Little dog inverts big God if ones stumbles, and the river refers to the current of the natural order moving life from inception towards death. Falling into it only disturbs the fish temporarily... notice also who and what Heinrich Hoffmann was?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

jews Are Pushing Both Immigration Sides...

...because gentiles ignore that nature simultaneously pushes (inception) and pulls (death) migration of being (life). Ignorance of the natural process represents a revolutionary mindset within gentiles, which a jew disguises as immigration vs remigration.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Free will is...

...missing OF CHOICE

You are free to go to hell

Choosing heaven or hell binds free will of choice. God sets choice free in-between...if one chooses either SIDE; then one loses SIGHT of God given while binding self.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

in the beginning was the verb

a) BE (being) GIN/GEN (generation)...the word "begin" tempts one to put the effect before the cause. It's an inversion.

b) IN (within) THE (theos)...only within God can there be a beginning (inception) and end (death) for each being (life).

c) Notice that the quote "in the beginning" is from GEN-esis...not BE-GENesis.

Words have power

Aka the consent by the LETTER who LETS another shape words. This transfer of power aka authoritative sanction is called fiat aka "LET it be done".

Sound represents the natural current; words represents fiat currency...if consented to.

hope you are in good intent

Hope vs fear + good vs bad distract from natural intent ...nature delineates; conflict encircles, hence versus/verto - "to turn".

Free will of choice cannot incline towards either side (hope or fear; good or bad) without binding itself.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sound implies cause; instrument implies effect...words imply affect. The articulation of words within natural sound represents witchcraft aka spellcraft.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

meaning dictionary symbolic

Affect

pattern recognition

Cause > effect

There can be only one pattern/patron/pater - "father".

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

a) Your mind represents the story/store (memory) for anything suggested by another.

b) Michelin/michael aka mikha-el - "who is like God?"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Michael

God implies sameness; being within God implies differential..."likeness" represents witchcraft used by few to equalize differences among many.

Cause (god) > effect (being) > affect (witchcraft)

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Witchcraft brews affection to distract from cause > effect. Affect implies synthesis; effect implies analysis...Primate98 used former; Ndvdmm asked for latter.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

properties of the pentagram

Each being represents a property of all nature...a penta (five) gram (that which is written or marked) distracts each being from ONEs self discernment.

Plurality (penta-gram) confines the mind of singularity (being) if consented to.

the other regular "-grams."

Regular/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/regular implies all of nature moving each being (life) within a straight line (inception towards death) aka delineation of essence from one another.

Gram - "that which is written or marked"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/-gram confuses ones delineation by alignment with one another, while permitting another to regulate one.

some collection of...mathematics

Few suggest math-a-magic to collectivize many together, which distracts each from being set apart from ONE another. Nature implies singularity adding (inception); subtracting (death); dividing (life) each being for multiplication (intercourse) with one another.

Counting another one as two makes one accountable to another one.

The most common item (honestly the only one I see)

Item/idem - "the same"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/item Nature implies the same process differentiating each being from one another. Few distract many from that with likeness into common-sense aka a hivemind of collective consciousness.

To see implies each ones sight...which cannot be the same (perceivable); only different from one another (perception) or alike one another (suggestion).

non integer

Only a fraction (perception) within whole (perceivable) can be IN (within) TEGER (to touch) hence being able to touch one another. Few utilize suggestion to tempt each fractions consent into a consensus held together with one another.

This touching one another without letting go, while being (life) within a moving nature (inception towards death) establishes friction, which grinds each integer into a non-integer.

square root

Ones perception in-between left/right + up/down + front/back implies the square rooted within all perceivable...consenting to any suggestion by another establishes circular thinking (logic); which turns into conflict (reason) against one another.

That's how few confine square within a circle drawn by a com (together) pass (to move forward).

Pythagoras

Ignoring ones SIGHT in-between perceivable by holding onto either SIDE suggested permits another to triangulate.

One (life) cannot perceive sides (inception/death) while being transferred in-between...

proof...

...is within (life) the putting (inception towards death).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

the collapse was engineered

Nature moves; anything a being builds collapses. Engine implies being within (en) generation (gine). Few suggest materialism to tempt many to hold onto that which is being build, while collapsing together within the ignored process of generation.

we couldve had...

  • WE implies one holding onto others.
  • COULD'VE HAD implies ignoring given potential for wanting possession.
1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

the layers of civilization get stripped away...not dwell on higher thoughts

Layers lure thought into lowering itself.

more primitive...less ability to connect

Because primitive/pre - "forwards" generates secondary/seco - "to divide"...few suggest connections to disable many.

not tied in with his own instinct

Instigation implies action (cause) instigating reaction (effect) aka motion prompting matter into responding. Action can neither be owned; nor tied...it's ignoring effect for affect, which ties effect into ownership to another.

own instinct, culture, language, lineage

Neither of which can be owned, hence few effortlessly shaping the instincts; cultures; languages and lineages of many at will.

groups... turn against each other

Joining a group artificially turns together, what nature delineates apart from one another. Whatever group one joins requires ones free will of choice to join, which by joining becomes bound to another.

God's word.

a) God implies sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all"...only within which a word can be shaped. Articulating words tempts one to ignore natural sound.

b) The word "God's" (with the little "s" attached) suggests that there's something that isn't God's. Words tempt ones mind to attach onto, while ignoring that all detaches each one within from one another.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

discovering religion

Dis (to divide) cover (to conceal) + re (to respond) ligo (to bind)...bondage prevents discovery.

christians of all

All implies singularity for each singular unit within..."christians" implies a plurality shaped by joining one another while ignoring singularity.

all denominations

All delineates each one within from one another...others tempt one to denominate few above many.

for christ to return

Christ (to anoint) implies a division from one another...return aka re (to respond) turn (to rotate) implies turning against one another.

Joining any religion returns each christened being back to nature. It's the words FOR and TO which imply nature forwarding each living being from inception towards death.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

A standard...holds...we are burning

Fire cannot be held onto. Burning implies liquefaction of solid. The spark of life implies solid (life) liquefaction (inception towards death)...and one cannot hold onto it.

The math doesn't add up.

Because a being cannot add anything to nature. Math is based on mentally affixing artificial parameters to measure in-between, while ignoring that nature implies a moving singularity.

Inception implies addition of being; death implies subtraction of being; intercourse implies multiplication of being, and being a solid (life) within a fluid (inception towards death) implies division of being. Singularity doesn't need to be measured, but a being can be easily manipulated with measurements.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shock and awe

The "Shock & Awe" doctrine is described as a strategy to achieve the systematic destruction of military capability through attrition, where appropriate, and to use overwhelming force to paralyze shock, unnerve, and ultimately accomplish the moral destruction of an opponent.

The International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD): A Program of Action presented at the conference called for massive propaganda effort, utilizing the mass media, non-governmental organizations, commercial entertainment, and academic institutions in an effort to "persuade" people in developing countries to change their fertility preferences.

~John Coleman - 'The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations'

liquefying in fiercer fires than they ever kindled

If being implies solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death); then fire kindled among solid pales in comparison to liquefaction. Grinding solids against each other to make sparks by friction is milder than the spark of life, generated at the center of liquid animation aka the hell-fire representing each beings IN (within) FERN (fire) AL (all) state.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

amazon detention scanning

The screen in front detains ones mind (detainment); what's on it amazes ones mind (amazement); and the transfer in-between enters and tames ones mind (entertainment)...how many of theses screens already have a camera pointing at one?

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

How do you know you really have free will of choice?

HAVE implies "to own; possess"...the thought of being able to own or possess binds ones free will of choice. A jew tempts gentiles into a have vs have not conflict thereby luring free will of choice into bondage.

Aren't you usually presented with a limited number of options

That which is presented to you is optional; that which presents you is primary. Balance implies primary; choice implies secondary...the presented choices of another implies optional. Either optional side presented tempts choice into imbalance against the other side.

As for limitation: Infinite nature represents the limit within which finite being is free to respond. A being cannot ever exhaust nature...only oneself or each other.

In other words...as long as one is free to choose; one can increase ones limit.

and those options are usually already engineered?

Engine implies being within (en) generation (gine)...nature implies the primary generator; being the secondary response to it. Optional social engineering tricks a being to respond to one another aka give consent to any suggestion, while ignoring natural engineering.

Natural engineering is about discerning self as within (en) generation (gine).

What you perceive as free will might just be trained behavior

a) What's trained behavior is leaving out OF CHOICE when talking about free will, which puts one a liberty of a chosen one.

b) Being able to perceive implies a division of all perceivable into each ones perception aka in-between (choice) a division (balance). It's the suggestions by another which are optional to one.

c) Train/trahere - "to pull, draw" positions ones choice in-between a push/pull balance aka life being pushed from inception and pulled towards death simultaneously.

A jew pushes optional choices to pull gentiles towards death, while distracting from the natural push aka the animation of life aka the inspiration of life aka breathing life into being.

to some degree at least.

a) Some/sum implies putting together...doing that binds free will of choice. Each chosen one summons the free will of choice of each gentile into a consensus aka together into bondage.

b) A degree (a position in a hierarchy) implies ones choice under a chosen one aka an inversion of each beings free will of choice.

Nature divides each being from one another...a jew suggests hierarchy to first rank each divided gentile, and then rank each divided jew above unified gentiles. This is how each jew can manipulate the degree of division among unified gentiles.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›