Whenever you write “it’s clear that” or “it’s obvious that” anyone with a lick of sense knows that what follows is not clear, or obvious, and is a source of contention amongst people of good will.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (7)
sorted by:
Light was before en-lighten-ment (mind within light) comes into being. The process of coming into being by division of all light into each mind establishes the division of clear/obscure (balance), which permits ones free will of choice in-between to discern self by clearing (discern) or obscuring (ignore) ones mind.
Suggesting to another that it IS clear or obvious tempts one to consent to obfuscation and obliviousness. Why? Because consenting to any suggestion represents a synthesis, while all (perceivable) enlightening the mind of each one (perception) implies analysis.
If one applies a synthesis to an analysis; then one obfuscates ones analytical mind into oblivion with all the information others are suggesting one to hold onto; believe in; define reality as etc.
...because following implies in the shadow of a leader.
There can be only one source for each one within.
Being within good/god implies being given free will of choice. Everything implies God...each things response to God (good) or one another (bad) is based one free will of choice.