Agree. multiple meaning had me take look see what made most sense from my eye. Not saying they don't mulitple meaning, but that was source to look into
Looked internet but haven't seen any these posted anywhere, official or not
USeful to start letter 2 throguh 6 to get feel of symbolism, lot to go through
After hammer out what eacjh was, looked what other people say pictogram analysis Hebrew letters (paleo Hebrew is officially pictogram, non-controversial)
...I do, however, feel compelled to offer a voice against some of the wild things that are becoming so popular on the internet and are contrary to everything scientific and evidentiary."
"The letter itself does not bear the meaning of the pictogram. It is a mistake to say that a letter means something. There is no meaning in a letter."
"Attempting to derive meaning from the alphabet rather than how words are used is not a worthy pursuit."
"You could never derive משפחה from a list of letter meanings. This theory has no predictive power. It is completely anecdotal, and it doesn’t fit many of the real words from the Hebrew language. It is powerless to give any kind of real sense to words, and it should be abandoned as a theory."
Perhaps? Sure seem like they really don't want to look into it
"Have you ever heard that Hebrew letters contain “pictographic meanings,” which can be decoded to reveal hidden messages? The idea is that the letters in the Hebrew alphabet were originally pictures. If you interpret the “ancient pictographic meanings” of each letter, you can discover deeper nuances of Hebrew words."
"Here is what you do to decode these secret messages encoded in Hebrew words: you recognize the “picture” represented by each Hebrew letter, then, when you put the “pictures” together, it reveals a message. Voilà!"
"There are all sorts of things you can contrive from this methodology. You can make words mean whatever you want! Who needs to learn Hebrew? Astonishingly, the example above is on the milder end of this wild spectrum of imagination."
"While this interpretive methodology is trendy among fringianics,[3] scholars universally reject it. Semitic scholars Dr. Michael Heiser and Dr. Michael Brown call it “nonsense” and even “dangerous false teaching.”[4] No scholarly lexicon defines Hebrew words according to the alleged pictographic meanings of the Hebrew letters. Nowhere do you find this methodology in any ancient Jewish writings (DSS, Targums, Pseudepigrapha, Josephus, Philo, etc.) or rabbinic literature (Mishnah, Talmud, Midrash, etc.). This idea just pops up out of nowhere in the past thirty years or so."
WHOA, you hear that? pictogram analysis of hebrew letters, (and perhaps combining them to analysis entire hebrew words, which I have not done) is "DANGEROUS FALSE TEACHING", someone could get hurt! Definitely DO NOT look at that you "Firngianics"!
"This means that interpreting the “pictographic meaning” of Hebrew words makes as much sense as interpreting the “pictographic meaning” of English words. Are we going to start pulling random words out of Mark Twain’s novels and decoding prophecies?
Shamefully, I bought into this idea in my earlier days as a Messianic believer, and I know many others have as well. It’s time to let this flawed interpretive methodology die. I hope this article helps expose the problems with “Hebrew Word Pictures” so we all will stop profaning our Messiah’s name by our foolishness. Let’s focus on learning truth and making a real difference in the world for God’s glory."
Buying into pictogram analysis is SHAMEFUL, FOR SHAME! Methinks J doth protest too much!
It is a mistake to say that a letter means something
Because if one takes a letter from another; then one misses that which allows one to measure.
There is no meaning in a letter
Meaning implies a measure held within mind, hence measurement...it's the one suggesting the LETTER; not the one LETTING another shape, who controls the meaning.
Attempting to derive meaning from the alphabet rather than how words are used is not a worthy pursuit.
Worth can only be derived from motion aka from being (life) moved (inception towards death). Any meaning derived from letters by holding definitions within mind corrupts ones evaluation of moving value.
Even Hebrew alphabet is blasphemy to God
Alpha (inception) > beta (life) > omega (death)...each being represents the beta moving from alpha towards omega. A jew utilizes the alpha + beta (alphabet) within which he brews (hebrew) new omegas; thereby inverting ones perception of origin with suggested outcomes.
A beta (life) cannot perceive alpha (inception) or omega (death) while in-between, but must nonetheless adapt to being moved from/to. Suggesting an outcome like "paradise; afterlife; winning; making it; reincarnation etc." tempts others to ignore the animation by origin of being.
The blasphemy to God (sound) implies speaking (word)...artificial words shaped within natural sound represent spell-craft.
It's because they have multiple meanings.
https://youtu.be/G_Fiyij2FP4
Agree. multiple meaning had me take look see what made most sense from my eye. Not saying they don't mulitple meaning, but that was source to look into
Aleph first letter has 13! sections on it meaning: https://www.hebrew4christians.com/Grammar/Unit_One/Aleph-Bet/Aleph/aleph.html
And that just one site
The languages that are so different in handwriting, and print just make no sense to me. Handwriting was here much longer than print.
Interesting, never thought of that, wonder where the differences come from
Looked internet but haven't seen any these posted anywhere, official or not
USeful to start letter 2 throguh 6 to get feel of symbolism, lot to go through
After hammer out what eacjh was, looked what other people say pictogram analysis Hebrew letters (paleo Hebrew is officially pictogram, non-controversial)
WHOA
First result come up for non-Paleo/ancient Hebrew pictograms(bolding mine) https://www.thehebrewcafe.com/main/2021/09/hebrew-pictographic-meanings/
"Hebrew Pictographic Meanings?
...I do, however, feel compelled to offer a voice against some of the wild things that are becoming so popular on the internet and are contrary to everything scientific and evidentiary."
"The letter itself does not bear the meaning of the pictogram. It is a mistake to say that a letter means something. There is no meaning in a letter."
"Attempting to derive meaning from the alphabet rather than how words are used is not a worthy pursuit."
"You could never derive משפחה from a list of letter meanings. This theory has no predictive power. It is completely anecdotal, and it doesn’t fit many of the real words from the Hebrew language. It is powerless to give any kind of real sense to words, and it should be abandoned as a theory."
Perhaps? Sure seem like they really don't want to look into it
Second result: https://davidwilber.com/articles/the-problem-with-hebrew-word-pictures
"Have you ever heard that Hebrew letters contain “pictographic meanings,” which can be decoded to reveal hidden messages? The idea is that the letters in the Hebrew alphabet were originally pictures. If you interpret the “ancient pictographic meanings” of each letter, you can discover deeper nuances of Hebrew words."
"Here is what you do to decode these secret messages encoded in Hebrew words: you recognize the “picture” represented by each Hebrew letter, then, when you put the “pictures” together, it reveals a message. Voilà!"
"There are all sorts of things you can contrive from this methodology. You can make words mean whatever you want! Who needs to learn Hebrew? Astonishingly, the example above is on the milder end of this wild spectrum of imagination."
"While this interpretive methodology is trendy among fringianics,[3] scholars universally reject it. Semitic scholars Dr. Michael Heiser and Dr. Michael Brown call it “nonsense” and even “dangerous false teaching.”[4] No scholarly lexicon defines Hebrew words according to the alleged pictographic meanings of the Hebrew letters. Nowhere do you find this methodology in any ancient Jewish writings (DSS, Targums, Pseudepigrapha, Josephus, Philo, etc.) or rabbinic literature (Mishnah, Talmud, Midrash, etc.). This idea just pops up out of nowhere in the past thirty years or so."
WHOA, you hear that? pictogram analysis of hebrew letters, (and perhaps combining them to analysis entire hebrew words, which I have not done) is "DANGEROUS FALSE TEACHING", someone could get hurt! Definitely DO NOT look at that you "Firngianics"!
"This means that interpreting the “pictographic meaning” of Hebrew words makes as much sense as interpreting the “pictographic meaning” of English words. Are we going to start pulling random words out of Mark Twain’s novels and decoding prophecies?
Shamefully, I bought into this idea in my earlier days as a Messianic believer, and I know many others have as well. It’s time to let this flawed interpretive methodology die. I hope this article helps expose the problems with “Hebrew Word Pictures” so we all will stop profaning our Messiah’s name by our foolishness. Let’s focus on learning truth and making a real difference in the world for God’s glory."
Buying into pictogram analysis is SHAMEFUL, FOR SHAME! Methinks J doth protest too much!
Even Hebrew alphabet is blasphemy to God
Because if one takes a letter from another; then one misses that which allows one to measure.
Meaning implies a measure held within mind, hence measurement...it's the one suggesting the LETTER; not the one LETTING another shape, who controls the meaning.
Worth can only be derived from motion aka from being (life) moved (inception towards death). Any meaning derived from letters by holding definitions within mind corrupts ones evaluation of moving value.
Alpha (inception) > beta (life) > omega (death)...each being represents the beta moving from alpha towards omega. A jew utilizes the alpha + beta (alphabet) within which he brews (hebrew) new omegas; thereby inverting ones perception of origin with suggested outcomes.
A beta (life) cannot perceive alpha (inception) or omega (death) while in-between, but must nonetheless adapt to being moved from/to. Suggesting an outcome like "paradise; afterlife; winning; making it; reincarnation etc." tempts others to ignore the animation by origin of being.
The blasphemy to God (sound) implies speaking (word)...artificial words shaped within natural sound represent spell-craft.
Hebrew4Christians is a good source.
The OP is the complete opposite, pareidolia and apophenia.
Explaining the difference isn't worth it for this graphic.