Ah, so government bailouts are just a false hope trap after all, makes sense. And those who recommend them are ghettoizing falseness too. And those who recommend linking up with ghettos in the first place are also false, in retrospect makes sense, had inklings of questioning certain people.
"Imagine an intensive care unit full of people. Monitors glow with electrocardiogram tracings, blood pressure measurements, and oxygenation readings. Ventilators whir as air is pumped in and out of lungs and feeding tubes drip nutrients. But these people are not getting better. They are “neomorts:” people with severe neurological injuries whose families have consented to allowing doctors to use their living bodies for experimentation."
Indeed, in intensive care brains run down, some brains are not enough with air pump and drip nutrients.
"In a recent podcast, bioethicist Arthur Caplan proudly proclaimed that he has pioneered using critically disabled people for research at NYU Langone Health in wards that he calls “bioemporia.” Dr. Caplan says that he discovered the idea of neomorts and bioemporia in an essay written by Dr. Willard Gaylin, a psychiatrist, for Harper’s Magazine in 1974 called “Harvesting the Dead.” In his article, Dr. Gaylin was pointing out the ethical risks inherent in the brain death concept by suggesting (tongue-in-cheek) that we could stockpile these neurologically injured people (who he christened “neomorts”) in centers called “bioemporia” — where we could experiment on them to our hearts’ delight."
Bioemporia sounds like they're for sale, sound like terrible violation humjan right
"Caplan says that not only is there now a bioemporium at NYU there are dozens starting up all over the country using “brain dead” people for drug testing and other research purposes. Caplan admits in the podcast that people with a brain death diagnosis are not biologically dead but that their “deaths” are a social construct — which is why they can be successfully kept on life support for these experiments."
Sound leftist, like transgenderism , make-believe nonsense
"It is highly unlikely that the families of these unfortunate people are being informed that their loved ones are only “socially dead” when doctors obtain “consent” for these experiments. When people who are registered organ donors have infections or other conditions that make them unable to donate, the family is approached and asked if doctors might keep their loved one on life support to do some tests. According to Caplan:"
Leftists like make-believe anyway
"According to Caplan:
We started by saying that it might advance transplant. We’re going to study something, maybe an artificial organ or some immune suppressing drug. And if you give us permission — they wanted to be organ donors, but they can’t, they clearly wanted to help — let’s do it that way. And if the family concurred (which reminding listeners, they don’t have to legally in an organ donation situation, but we were trying to be safe here in this idea of studying the body) if we take them for 72 hours, would you give us permission? And a lot of people did."
Again, sad leftists are fine with this kind of thinking
Wonder leads wrong choices, indeed don't trade for certainty, people do not wonder? "Where is this wondering going? Have wondered many days." Do not be beginner, be expert, expert knows things, to know is see
Sound reasoning, indeed the ownership would be perfect for the resource.
Would definitely agree edible microchips aren't a concern, but some people have concerns that the food stores can be broken into and set on fire, they might even take some of the food for themselves who knows, we've had a bunch of stories of that
Too long around here and you think everything is a conspiracy!
Every Hollowood movie is a humiliation ritual
As far as your reasoning is concerned, think it's 100% fine. Didn't fully understand the meaning of your message with my first response, took it at face value. It's just this joke of a modern world can confuse people's natural senses when they're not careful, heat is totally fine to deal with
No of course you are completely right I agree, sorry I did not carefully choose my wording, I was just thinking that the amount of convenience these days can make life a total joke, we're just cruising by the meaningless billboard messages on the highway of life, those damn empty advertising can sometimes cleverly worded to not directly lie to you but are deceptive still, they can be misleading
True, sorry should more careful how I word things, it's just amount of convenience everyone has these day is like a joke, it can make them lazy as they cruise past the meaningless billboard messages on the road.
Two pairs of 3 dots in triangles, 33
What the hell, great find, never heard of
Never seen that statue before, wild, very weird.
Yes but I believe this painting Satanic because it elevates one man up to diety status, there is only one God, I believe this painting a Jewish Synagogue of Satan creation, our founding government is not truly Christian, it is a mockery of Christianity
Elon remind me of bad guy from Casino Royale
Do you think Iran should try increase the intensity of firepower on US? Or do you think they're already maxed out?
True, they are still up against goliath, perhaps overestimated their ability to speak demands of Trump
No I'm aware of the oil price factor, I thought there might be another message to it lately, but it could just be mostly oil
Now that you mention, smurf seem like another metaphor for Jews? Blue, wear hats, cryptic lanugage with multiple meanings,
Also wikipedia(bold mine): In English, they were briefly named the goblins in the book Dilly Duckling and the Goblins (1973) before being renamed the Smurfs.[7]
Haven't deep look, but interesting possiblity
Ah, that is great alternate term. Passions not intrinsically bad, but one must watch out to do something stupid because of them.
Think the "these 7 sins are always immoral character traits" is a J scam sold to and layered on top of proper Christianity.
Well, you prompted things with a post 2 hours ago.
And people still dodge the question of libertarianism, I think are afraid to really stop and think about it.