If you don't need human interaction at all why would you be concerned about feminism in the first place? Isn't it a contradiction? Also, why do you write comments to humans in threads like this one if you don't care about human interaction?
Good for you. Just don't complain when real human interaction is not available at all anymore.
Crazy feminism and other extreme left ideologies are also probably a part of this. Dehumanization of society is in full swing now. Everyone must hate everyone else. Otherwise how else would you force people into 24/7 communication with a machine.
Take any average person from, say, 70s and put them in current time. They would run away immediately screaming in horror. No sane and normal person would accept that abomination our society is being currently turn into. The frog is being boiled slowly... and this frog is almost finished.
That's because They know that everyone loves to be "right", so They let everyone be "right". Everyone is just right about the wrong things.
This is actually a very interesting concept. You might be right. I think one of the main reasons why nothing ever changes is that people are ready to argue endlessly about some unimportant bullshit while being reluctant to talk about things that really matter. They can argue about, say, were there planes on 9/11 or not, which is just a technical detail, while completely forgetting more important questions: Why was it done, who benefits from it, what are their goals and how we could possibly stop them or at least prevent them from orchestrating similar psyops in the future.
To be honest, I also do not consider the question "who" to be the most important. Is it important? Yes, absolutely... but probably not the most important.
So your idea is that they are truly religious and that it is their strenght, so to say... Hmm, I've always considered religion being more for the plebs. Meaning that the elites themselves do not believe in any of that... My idea is that the elites are basically psychopaths, almost like a different species and that human beings really are not so similar as we are being told to believe. But you might be right as well. Psychopathy does not exclude deep religious beliefs, I guess...
Read that post. Yeah, that's some nice research. Somewhat similar to what Mathis does.
Well, yes, of course it's entirely possible that few spook families have been controlling the world for a while now. What I'm mostly interested is "how" and "why". How do they manipulate public perception and what exactly is the mechanism of power behind the scenes. Also, why do they do that, to which most simple answer is power and control... Of course, there may be other answers as well.
One other theory I'm currently interested in is the one about recurrent resets. In short: Our history might not even exist and our civilization could be deliberately reset at regular intervals of about 200-300 years. If it's true, then we are currently on the verge of next reset. Most likely reason is that TPTB can't hold control forever. Sooner or later masses do eventually wake up to how heavily they are being fucked by the system, so in order to keep their power and control, rulers orchestrate a reset after which everything starts anew. New lies, new control schemes and all the rest shitshow... However, their biggest mistake is assuming that this can keep going on forever. It can't. There will come a time when they no longer will be able to hold their power no matter what. Reset or no reset...
There are variations of that, of course. The intervals might be longer, our history might be only a partial lie and said resets might be of a softer kind. For example, WW1 and WW2 were most likely orchestrated deliberately. Maybe those can be considered sort of resets as well...
They will all just keep everyone running from pillar to post around the "mainstream conspiracy" paradigm...
Well, of course if you get all your information from a single source and do not explore anything else outside it, you won't get anywhere far. I think multiple sources and critical thinking is the key here. Also, not believe in anything outright. You don't have to have an opinion or some definite belief about everything. There's a lot of stuff about which I simply do not have any strong opinion whatsoever.
The reason I say the paradigm is different is because there is no accumulation or refinement of the sum of mainstream conspiracy research that will get you anywhere near the truth.
Hmm, but you have to have at least some entrypoint... You can't simply dump a lot of info on a normie and expect them to believe it. Even if it's true and correct. You see, it's a dead end. The more out there the actual truth is the harder is to get someone to even contemplate it.
See any of my numerous Salem Witch posts.
I'll check them out. Do you have some definite post to recommend or maybe something like tldr intro?
The work of Miles Mathis is connected, but I never miss an opportunity to highlight and specify how full of disinformation it really is.
Mathis is a strange one. He has opened my eyes on some things, but he's also sometimes very obviously full of shit. He calls literally anyone a disinfo agent, but he also might be one himself. Hmm.
Really, it's more akin to a high school student assigned to write an essay...
Well, kinda, but that's exactly why he can be considered a sort of "normie friendly" conspiracy theorist. Again, no normie will never ever listen to what the likes of Alex Jones has to say, but some normies might listen to what Corbett says. (As an aside note: I suspect that this is exactly why the character of Alex Jones exist. To invalidate any talking point in normie minds that TPTB deem unwelcome to be discussed. It goes like this: Normie listens to a snippet of AJ talking and normie will never again take that point seriously, even if it's true.)
...no shocking revelations, no insight...
I agree with first statement, but not quite with the second one. Yes, Corbett does not make shocking revelations, but do we actually need them? The whole point he reiterates repeatedly is that all the information you need is already available openly. It's not about shocking revelations of lizard people, aliens, or elite eating babies... It's about connecting the dots and understanding how the system works. How it takes and how it maintains power. Also, about how to resist it.
As for insights... Well, not in every video, but he does actually provide insights and new ways to think about things from time to time.
...the reader believes this is the ultimate extent of the research...
I can somewhat agree with this one. Yes, he has certain boundaries outside which he won't go. Then again, it's up to each one individually to find information form various sources and glue it all together. There is not one truthsayer out there who will give you everything on a plate.
It sounded like he had ripped it right from the headlines of the NYT and WaPo.
Hmm, I got completely opposite impression. While he doesn't venture to some further out there theories (like the ones saying war doesn't exist or that it's fake etc), his analysis on basic facts is usually spot on. From the very start he has stated that this war is a building block for the NWO, that Multipolar World Order is the same NWO just in a different package and that basically the whole endeavour is totally engineered and planned. Also, that this is basically a war of governments on their own populations much more than a war against some outside enemy... Well, I don't know, but seems to me this is very different from what NYT and WaPo are saying...
All in all, it might sound like I'm totally defending him and agree with him on everything... That's not quite true either. The value of Corbett is his "down to earth" takes and interesting viewpoints to consider. Even if he is a controlled op, the likes of already mentioned AJ and all the other politically partisan pundits are much, much more harmful than Corbett will ever be.
At this point literally anyone could be controlled op. I do listen to Corbett from time to time, but do not take anything he (or anyone else, for that matter) says without some critical evaluation. I like that his takes often go into some surprising and unexpected directions. Also, he does not fall into stupid left/right paradigm and he's one of the few who says elections are a farce and a theater (which they are). Seriously, there are too many alternatives who still have their heads up in political ass so deep that they simply can't see anything outside their tiny constructed political bubble. Trump this, Trump that. Biden this, Biden that. Democrats, Republicans... It's all bullshit for the masses. We have to realize that. Until then nothing will change.
I consider Corbett being something like a bridge between normie world and conspiracy sphere. Let's be honest, you can't show average normie, for example, Alex Jones (who's definitely controlled op) and expect said normie to actually seriously listen and evaluate that. You can, however, do that with Corbett.
I think you're right. Most of the people don't know that there is no such a thing as rogue AI. Any AI is being controlled and programmed by someone. Also, AI does not think. Period. It's just a glorified and complex LLM algorithm.
So, it's a perfect coverup for any psyop being planned.
My guess would be:
-
Depopulation. "Oh, no, AI did it!"
-
Total control. "Because of AI going rogue we need total surveillance and digital ID."
-
And ultimately NWO. "Oh, no, AI will kill us all unless the whole world unites under one world government."
Hmm, to think about it, they could try all of the above with aliens as well, but rogue AI is more believable, I guess...
I did not mean so much a job itself as the fact that even if you do have a job, even if you do earn a living and, yes, even if you do love it, you're still surrounded by zombies, you're still living in an insane society and you still are forced to follow some insane laws, policies or whatever.
Good job is not just about what you literally do. It's also about your colleagues, your clients, your surrounding environment and all that shit.
Yes, I absolutely agree that with some effort you can sorta make your life somewhat bearable, but the general idea is that we are not isolated units. We will inevitably be affected by the larger society or masses, regardless we want it or not. If the society is batshit insane it will inevitably rub off on you at least to some degree.
Well, basically I do agree with you regarding jobs. It's not that getting a job is impossible. How good it will be, well, that's another question.
However, original meaning was not just about jobs, but basically about everything. Even if you do get a job, you still have bunch of zombies living around you. Even if you don't use any apps you don't like, everyone around you still are. Even if you don't use AI and outsource all your thinking to it, everyone around you still are... Even if you don't believe tv and mass media, everyone around you still are... And that will inevitably affect you and influence your choices, want it or not.
See, it's not that I'm afraid to starve (well, that too, but it's not the point). It's that the world is turning into mush very fast and very seriously. And that is a problem, I don't yet know how to deal with.
I agree with your general attitude towards jobs, normies etc. That really is the way things should be handled in general. However, in real life this is not always possible. Sometimes the choice is between starvation and going along with the system at least on a temporary basis. I'm extrapolating, of course, but you get my point. Theory and real life do not match each other 100% all the time.
That means their system will implode eventually.
Well, let's hope you're right. Otherwise our future looks quite bleak indeed.
Well, yes, I've done this as well. Asking people to install some other app and not the one they want me to use. That worked and it's nice when it works. For the time being it kind of does.
Now, but what about times when you need something? A job, for example. Sure, you can reject that job that forces you to install WhatsApp, but that automatically means your choices are narrowing. Then you search for the next job, but you're rejected from that one as well... How far are you ready to go like that? Go live in the woods? Just because of WhatsApp?
This is not a retorical question, btw. I don't know the answer to that as well. Thus far I've been able to kind of sidestep this issue, but that may not be always so. I don't know how far I'm willing to go. Ok, in case of WhatsApp, the solution would be to get another phone, install WhatsApp on that and use it only for job purposes and nothing else. But what about digital id they are preparing to push onto everyone or some other similar bullshit?
The only prerequisite is to be more needed for them, than you need them. And this is not very difficult today, when people with more than dozen brain cells between ears become rarity, everybody need them deadly.
Nah, normies will have AI for that. Hell, they already have it. I can't say I agree with you on this one. Sure, there are some cases when this is true, but in general, I wouldn't say that this is a rule. Human intelligence is being replaced very rapidly with AI, automation, institutions or just plain old bureaucracy. The system does not need smart people. It only tolerates them where it can't do without them, but it is working hard on eliminating that need altogether.
I think that most of those cases are fake, but that's just me.
Do the actual shootings happen? Some probably do, but some probably don't. Do I think it's all due to some some crazy lone shooters (whatever the reason)? No, I don't. Those are orchestrated events for public consumption.
As for this particular case, what makes you think that there even were any medications involved? What makes you think that the trial is real? It's just articles and reports in mainstream media. So, basically everyone's just making assumptions based on mainstream media which is a very shaky foundation to make any conclusions on, to say the least. Why is it even televised, for that matter? Because it's a show. A show with specific goals in mind.
What's the problem to throw out your iPhone, do not use social media and so on, if all that began to force AI, DEI, LGBTXYZ and other shit in exchange to the access to their services?
The problem is that even if I personally don't use those services, everyone else is. This goes to companies as well as individuals. In some places companies simply can't exist without at least some concessions to the idiocy and individuals can't have any meaningful career or in some cases even a job without at least a slight nod to the system. Sure, it depends on area, type of company, type of profession etc, but you get what I mean.
I've managed to escape that somehow, but it is definitely not so easy as you make it sound. I agree with Mrx here. No man is an island against all that shit. Yeah, sure, there are circumstances in which escape might be possible, but not everyone can freely choose where to live and work... After all it's not my fucking fault that The West and some countries in particular have gone batshit insane.
I might be mistaken, but seems to me that the whole thing is a one big psyop. From start to finish.
End goals?
Increasing control of family unit by the state. Imagine a world where all new mothers have to go through psych evaluation when giving birth. Imagine how much power over individual lives it gives to the state when every new parent can simply be declared insane and their child taken away.
Depopulation. If any mother can be declared insane at any moment it gives the state extreme power to orchestrate depopulation. Besides, it would seriously discourage women to even want children to begin with... as if they are not already discouraged enough. In addition, this might be the beginning of child permits. It has already been predictive programmed through some movies and such.
Also, good old divide and conquer.
Maybe. Or maybe it's because of increasing complexity of the system as a whole. Perhaps, it has something to do with digitalization of the world. It's like second layer of simulation which also needs separate processing power.
Yeah, except it quite possibly wasn't the same person. Tiffany that disappeared differs significantly from the one that reappeared.
Maybe they hoped that this will go away on its own and when it didn't they filmed this "reappearance"?
Bullshit! Everybody won't have their own AI ever. This is a false promise and a trap. This has been done before already for many, many times. Open source, smartphones, the internet... The promise is always the same. "Technology will set you free and make you more powerful! Future is looking bright! We just need more technology! Yayyy!" Unfortunately, the end result is also always the same...
Look at today's society and ask yourself: Is it really free? Is it powerful? Is it wealthy? Is the world in general getting better or worse?
It's a lie. All of it.