I think you're right. Most of the people don't know that there is no such a thing as rogue AI. Any AI is being controlled and programmed by someone. Also, AI does not think. Period. It's just a glorified and complex LLM algorithm.
So, it's a perfect coverup for any psyop being planned.
My guess would be:
-
Depopulation. "Oh, no, AI did it!"
-
Total control. "Because of AI going rogue we need total surveillance and digital ID."
-
And ultimately NWO. "Oh, no, AI will kill us all unless the whole world unites under one world government."
Hmm, to think about it, they could try all of the above with aliens as well, but rogue AI is more believable, I guess...
I did not mean so much a job itself as the fact that even if you do have a job, even if you do earn a living and, yes, even if you do love it, you're still surrounded by zombies, you're still living in an insane society and you still are forced to follow some insane laws, policies or whatever.
Good job is not just about what you literally do. It's also about your colleagues, your clients, your surrounding environment and all that shit.
Yes, I absolutely agree that with some effort you can sorta make your life somewhat bearable, but the general idea is that we are not isolated units. We will inevitably be affected by the larger society or masses, regardless we want it or not. If the society is batshit insane it will inevitably rub off on you at least to some degree.
Well, basically I do agree with you regarding jobs. It's not that getting a job is impossible. How good it will be, well, that's another question.
However, original meaning was not just about jobs, but basically about everything. Even if you do get a job, you still have bunch of zombies living around you. Even if you don't use any apps you don't like, everyone around you still are. Even if you don't use AI and outsource all your thinking to it, everyone around you still are... Even if you don't believe tv and mass media, everyone around you still are... And that will inevitably affect you and influence your choices, want it or not.
See, it's not that I'm afraid to starve (well, that too, but it's not the point). It's that the world is turning into mush very fast and very seriously. And that is a problem, I don't yet know how to deal with.
I agree with your general attitude towards jobs, normies etc. That really is the way things should be handled in general. However, in real life this is not always possible. Sometimes the choice is between starvation and going along with the system at least on a temporary basis. I'm extrapolating, of course, but you get my point. Theory and real life do not match each other 100% all the time.
That means their system will implode eventually.
Well, let's hope you're right. Otherwise our future looks quite bleak indeed.
Well, yes, I've done this as well. Asking people to install some other app and not the one they want me to use. That worked and it's nice when it works. For the time being it kind of does.
Now, but what about times when you need something? A job, for example. Sure, you can reject that job that forces you to install WhatsApp, but that automatically means your choices are narrowing. Then you search for the next job, but you're rejected from that one as well... How far are you ready to go like that? Go live in the woods? Just because of WhatsApp?
This is not a retorical question, btw. I don't know the answer to that as well. Thus far I've been able to kind of sidestep this issue, but that may not be always so. I don't know how far I'm willing to go. Ok, in case of WhatsApp, the solution would be to get another phone, install WhatsApp on that and use it only for job purposes and nothing else. But what about digital id they are preparing to push onto everyone or some other similar bullshit?
The only prerequisite is to be more needed for them, than you need them. And this is not very difficult today, when people with more than dozen brain cells between ears become rarity, everybody need them deadly.
Nah, normies will have AI for that. Hell, they already have it. I can't say I agree with you on this one. Sure, there are some cases when this is true, but in general, I wouldn't say that this is a rule. Human intelligence is being replaced very rapidly with AI, automation, institutions or just plain old bureaucracy. The system does not need smart people. It only tolerates them where it can't do without them, but it is working hard on eliminating that need altogether.
I think that most of those cases are fake, but that's just me.
Do the actual shootings happen? Some probably do, but some probably don't. Do I think it's all due to some some crazy lone shooters (whatever the reason)? No, I don't. Those are orchestrated events for public consumption.
As for this particular case, what makes you think that there even were any medications involved? What makes you think that the trial is real? It's just articles and reports in mainstream media. So, basically everyone's just making assumptions based on mainstream media which is a very shaky foundation to make any conclusions on, to say the least. Why is it even televised, for that matter? Because it's a show. A show with specific goals in mind.
What's the problem to throw out your iPhone, do not use social media and so on, if all that began to force AI, DEI, LGBTXYZ and other shit in exchange to the access to their services?
The problem is that even if I personally don't use those services, everyone else is. This goes to companies as well as individuals. In some places companies simply can't exist without at least some concessions to the idiocy and individuals can't have any meaningful career or in some cases even a job without at least a slight nod to the system. Sure, it depends on area, type of company, type of profession etc, but you get what I mean.
I've managed to escape that somehow, but it is definitely not so easy as you make it sound. I agree with Mrx here. No man is an island against all that shit. Yeah, sure, there are circumstances in which escape might be possible, but not everyone can freely choose where to live and work... After all it's not my fucking fault that The West and some countries in particular have gone batshit insane.
I might be mistaken, but seems to me that the whole thing is a one big psyop. From start to finish.
End goals?
Increasing control of family unit by the state. Imagine a world where all new mothers have to go through psych evaluation when giving birth. Imagine how much power over individual lives it gives to the state when every new parent can simply be declared insane and their child taken away.
Depopulation. If any mother can be declared insane at any moment it gives the state extreme power to orchestrate depopulation. Besides, it would seriously discourage women to even want children to begin with... as if they are not already discouraged enough. In addition, this might be the beginning of child permits. It has already been predictive programmed through some movies and such.
Also, good old divide and conquer.
Maybe. Or maybe it's because of increasing complexity of the system as a whole. Perhaps, it has something to do with digitalization of the world. It's like second layer of simulation which also needs separate processing power.
Yeah, except it quite possibly wasn't the same person. Tiffany that disappeared differs significantly from the one that reappeared.
Maybe they hoped that this will go away on its own and when it didn't they filmed this "reappearance"?
I think you're attributing too much importance to humans. The system has to process not only humans, but also weather, animals, various physical processes and such...
Besides, who's to tell at what age any human has the most potential to effect largest long-term effects? A child is very powerless, but when you have a bunch of 70 and 80 year old psychopaths deciding the future of the whole of humanity... well, that seems to me much, much larger long term risk than a chaotic child.
I think everyone is getting older. The zoomers are getting older too.
Well, when I was zoomer age, I did not feel any time speeding up. So there... Also, I imagine you could ask some boomers did they feel time is running like crazy when they were 30 and ask the same question people who are 30 now. Of course, answers will wary, but I'm quite certain that there will be much more 30 year old people now who feel that time isn't right than those who were 30 in, say, 80s or 90s.
...to be a plausible explanation for this...
I don't think this has anything to do with physics at all. Consider it a thought experiment of sorts. If we really are living in a simulation and time is speeding up on a systemic level, then internal logic of the simulation itself will not be impacted. Like in that game which runs in a ridiculously low framerate. The internal logic of it will still work. It'll be janky as hell, it will lag, but barring some very poor coding decisions (like tying some internal logic directly to framerate) it will all still work pretty much correctly.
Also, I did not state that I consider it to be rock solid explanation. However, I do feel strongly that time really is speeding up and it can't be explained simply by age or smartphone use. This is happening on some kind of a fundamental level.
(Reposting my answer to other comment from this thread.)
(1) A lot of people of different generations are noticing time speeding up. Not just boomers, not just millenials... Every generation notices this. If it would be due to age, only boomers would notice this and, come to think of it, I've seen very few boomers talking about this.
(2) If it would be simply due to age, then we would hear the same from even older generations before 2015, which is absolutely not the case. Our grandparents and our grandgrandparents would talk about it, it would be written about in old books and so on. Actually, what we witness is completely opposite. Old age was considered a time of peace and calm and you won't find any of this time speeding up crap in there.
(3) If it would be only because of proportionality, then the very rate of time speeding up would actually slow down (because each year lived makes increasingly smaller part of your life) which, again, is not the case. Not only time itself is speeding up, but the acceleration rate is speeding up as well.
So, no, it is not due to age. I understand completely your proportionality argument, but I do not buy it. It is a kind of a low hanging fruit.
The fundamental forces are diminishing over time.
Hmm, if we buy into the simulation argument, maybe it is due to increasing complexity? As the system becomes more and more complex, it starts to lag. At first it's barely noticeable, but the more it struggles to compute and process our reality, the more noticeable it becomes. Our reality becomes janky, a lot of events are being simulated simultaneously... the system looses its fluidity...
Easily.
(1) A lot of people of different generations are noticing time speeding up. Not just boomers, not just millenials... Every generation notices this. If it would be due to age, only boomers would notice this and, come to think of it, I've seen very few boomers talking about this.
(2) If it would be simply due to age, then we would hear the same from even older generations before 2015, which is absolutely not the case. Our grandparents and our grandgrandparents would talk about it, it would be written about in old books and so on. Actually, what we witness is completely opposite. Old age was considered a time of peace and calm and you won't find any of this time speeding up crap in there.
(3) If it would be only because of proportionality, then the very rate of time speeding up would actually slow down (because each year lived makes increasingly smaller part of your life) which, again, is not the case. Not only time itself is speeding up, but the acceleration rate is speeding up as well.
So, no, it is not due to age. I understand completely your proportionality argument, but I do not buy it. It is a kind of a low hanging fruit.
I know about physics and gravitational time dilation. That is not what I'm talking about. Also, I'm not entirely sure that theory of relativity is not a total bullcrap, but that is a discussion for another time.
Besides, time is not slowing down. It is speeding up. And I'm not talking about long timespans in tens or hundreds of thousands of years (which would be required for gravitational time dilation to take place). I'm talking about very short timespan. About 10 years or so. Time is speeding up very noticeably since about 2015 or so. And no, it is not change of perception due to aging or because of phones and social media (as reddit bots are very quick to explain this phenomena).
This right here is one of the possible explanations of that. Which ties together very nicely with simulation theory and if we indeed are living in a simulation then obviously all of the physics are simulated as well which makes all your explanation kind of moot.
On a similar note, regardless whether we are indeed living in a simulation or not, I do kind of doubt that matter is even real. I do think that it is entirely possible that consciousness is primary and all the matter around us is being constructed (thought of) by that consciousness. Modern physics, of course, take a totally different approach stating that matter is primary and all consciousness is being created in the matter by shooting neurons back and forth in our brains or whatever.
At this point literally anyone could be controlled op. I do listen to Corbett from time to time, but do not take anything he (or anyone else, for that matter) says without some critical evaluation. I like that his takes often go into some surprising and unexpected directions. Also, he does not fall into stupid left/right paradigm and he's one of the few who says elections are a farce and a theater (which they are). Seriously, there are too many alternatives who still have their heads up in political ass so deep that they simply can't see anything outside their tiny constructed political bubble. Trump this, Trump that. Biden this, Biden that. Democrats, Republicans... It's all bullshit for the masses. We have to realize that. Until then nothing will change.
I consider Corbett being something like a bridge between normie world and conspiracy sphere. Let's be honest, you can't show average normie, for example, Alex Jones (who's definitely controlled op) and expect said normie to actually seriously listen and evaluate that. You can, however, do that with Corbett.