Well, once the bleeding heart liberals get ahold of this story, they're going to... uh... not give a rat's ass because it's not part of the agenda and they have not been instructed to care about it.
And anyway, mental illness is now a virtue. Single-payer healthcare. Late-stage capitalism. Brave and stunning.
This reminds me of a similar sentiment from Iranian "terrorists", and also an example of how--yes, indeed--things can (almost) be erased from history.
In the the movie "Argo", there's the scene of a press conference given by the students out in front of the US Embassy after they had taken it over. It replicated an actual event, which I had remembered from the time it took place.
There was a big banner on the embassy wall behind them, and I was impressed that the filmmakers had included that detail. You can't quite see all the wording, so I went to look it up online.
It does not exist. Want to know why? Filling in a few missing words, the banner reads:
We differentiate between the United States corrupt government and fair honest American people
Oh no, not quite on message for a bunch of terrorists, is it?
You can get very partial glimpses of the actual banner in this documentary: American Embassy - Thames TV: Look from 1'25" to 3'22".
So the most complete record of this banner exists only in "Argo", at least in English. Which is all very ironic because "Argo" is about the CIA, made by the CIA, and starring a CIA asset. What a strange world we live in.
PS: Anyone else notice how terrorists have given up on press conferences, and even on making demands? They just attack people who are inconvenient to US and Israeli geopolitical objectives.
For the last couple of years I had the hypothetical question on my mind: how many people would do what they knew was right even if everyone else thought (because they were told) that they were the worst person in the world?
I never thought it would actually play out, but here we are with Putin and Ukraine.
Russia and the DPR clearly don't want to have to put this guy down, as the story implicitly admits in the first sentence:
British national Aiden Aslin has been told by his Russian captors that his execution will go ahead and that 'time is running out' for Britain to save him.
Otherwise they'd just announce that this guy was done-zo and take him out back. So that brings up my favorite part:
... the [British] Government has thus far refused to intervene directly to prevent the sentence.
They want this guy dead, of course, a martyr for their Neo-Imperialist cause. I'm sure they pray to Satan for it to be televised live. Then they can decry the pitiless brutality of the aggressor and trumpet the righteousness of their cause.
Oh, and they don't have time to intervene, anyway. Way too busy shipping weapons into a war zone. For peace.
Nobody ever talks about it, but I think in such a situation the cops would fold very, very quickly. Like in Uvalde, to confront one teenager that doesn't exist, it takes 50 during the incident and 500 afterwards for no known reason. (Or whatever the numbers are, I can't bother to look.)
But what happens when this standing army starts getting out of line, and then someone SWATs his gun nut UltraMAGA neighbor? Only--ooops!--it's actually an ambush at an abandoned house and the entire team is wiped out as a very harsh example. How many of these power-tripping thugs are interested in suitin' and bootin' for the next go-round?
I agree, and it is very depressing. But there is some light in the darkness.
In that dank hellhole of disinformation that is Wikipedia, I constantly come across stuff that I'm stunned they just left laying around in plain sight. I mean, even if it was a lie, they're still--in practice--admitting to it.
The flip side to that flip side is that they don't need to hide it all, because few are reading, fewer still are understanding, and almost no one realizes the true meaning. (Perfect example is the first line of the Georgia Guidestones.)
First, I would make the scholarly argument that "Amalek" originally referred to adherents to Satan It's an interesting and illuminating (haha) case, but quite long.
Of course, since Satan rules this world, the original meaning has been inverted, so that "Amalek" eventually gets used when pointing to someone or something that stands in the way of Satan's goals. See how neatly that holds together?
The Khazarians, generally being both intelligent and violent supremacists, gladly fill in all the connecting "logic" and "facts" of the inversion, and congratulate themselves on their moral superiority for thus saving the world.
I recall first hearing about this story a decade ago, and what I've learned in that time is one of the most fundamental, most important techniques of the Ministry of Truth.
You see, in all that time NASA has never tried to cover it up, or argue against it, or hide the survivors, or "deboonk" the conspiracy theory. All they've done is keep telling the same story of the tragic deaths of the astro-nots.
And that's it. The technique is simplicity itself: just keep telling the lie longer than anyone else can keep telling the truth. If they persist long enough, the lie will undoubtedly prevail as bedrock reality.
People really need to focus on the phrase "no health authority in the world".
There's a world-wide genocide going on and none of these people anywhere have the balls and/or brains to say one word about it. Take note that this is what the entirety of the World Health Establishment is worth to you: (checking my math here) something less than zero.
One might even be tempted to say they're part of the problem.
Mathematicians say they can prove anything at all, if you just spot them one miracle. For the Medical-Industrial Complex, "standard of care" is that miracle.
"Standard of care" is, essentially, declaring some medical treatment as safe, healthful, beneficial and even mandatory solely by fiat. Even if it drops you right in your tracks (see Tiffany Dover), then that's on you because probably you just suck at being alive. For proof, see the first sentence of this paragraph.
I consider the existence of NPCs as a substantial fraction of the population one of the biggest secrets of the Elite. They want you to continue believing that these are people you just somehow differ with because of culture or values or intelligence or any other reason. This is not the case.
When you finally accept the reality of NPCs, you begin to see the world with new eyes. You think and feel and act very differently. If you go back and watch "The Matrix", you'll notice that all the "awakened" people barely interact with the others who are still in the Matrix. Now you know why.
Russia is going to do what they're going to do, and i think that was decided long ago. They are past negotiating, or even caring what the West thinks. Would you trust any Western government to keep their promises?
That said, it's not really even a provocation, but more a psyop. Any counter-measure will be characterized as an aggression. Even if they do nothing and the residents of Kaliningrad suffer in any way, then "tHeY dOn'T eVeN cArE aBoUt ThEiR oWn PeOpLe!"
The key question is how many Westerners will buy into the narrative. Support seems to be crumbling. Even the (Anti-)Pope now says openly that Russia was provoked into military action. Who saw that coming?
I suspect the Puppet Masters no longer care about popular support or even the pretense of it. They will keep commanding their "troops" to do their bidding. And what happens when that persists for long?
Anyone ever heard of fragging? Rumor has it that's essentially what happened to those 50 or so Ukrainian officers in a recent Kalibr missile strike.
I believe the world will be very different in the near future, but the process of birthing it is proving very painful.
The news itself is like a spear thrust at the heart of the Medical-Industrial Complex, but it cannot be underestimated that it comes out of the University of Oxford.
If you've ever wondered where the "official narrative" comes from in any area of what was once called a "liberal education", it's Oxford. Specifically, Oxford University Press (OUP) is the black hole at the center of the galaxy of what passes for modern culture, and the dark rays emanating from it "enlighten" all corners of our world. Want to pollute your mind? Get a book from OUP.
That it's the home of the Rhodes Scholarship should surprise no one reading this, and ties us into so many misadventures. Oxford probably has more spooks than Langley, since they got started centuries before.
Two aliens in a power struggle, long-running like a soap opera, humans caught in the middle. Each is known by many names, so the pieces of the story are dispersed among many sources. The problem is, researchers either do not make the proper identifications or make incorrect ones so they never put the pieces together.
The real big problem, which you can see all around, is that everyone either does not care or already "knows" what the story is.Either way, they stand no chance of ever running into the truth.
Yes, the evidence has been rewritten, distorted, scattered, but I put it together and I'm no one special. When I look around, though, no one is close to the truth and they don't really desire it anyway. What they already have they find sufficient.
We've entered into such a surreal time. Biden (or whoever puppeteers him) and the other Liberals are taking actions that I don't believe anyone who writes laws and constitutions and sets up government structures ever even considered.
Like, it's explicitly illegal to shoplift from a store, but what if someone bulldozed the entire store and crushed all the goods beneath the treads?
And oh yeah, I guess it's not really illegal to shoplift from a store anymore.
I didn't know too much about Masonry when a few years ago I came across the fact that Masons take the "Oath of Nimrod". That told me all I needed to know that it was, at heart, a Satanic organization.
"Well," you might be saying, "Nimrod did challenge Yahweh with the whole Tower of Babel thing, but c'mon, Satanic?"
All I can say is that there is a much, much longer story behind that incident, who Nimrod and Yahweh really were, and the relationship between the two.
For reference, here's the matching r/conspiracy post: What is an American chemical weapons specialist doing in Ukraine?
Browse through it and tt's hard to believe the sheer repetition of shills troubling themselves to post variations of "Nothing to see here. If you don't move on, yOuR dUm!"
I read it as confirmation that this guy was sheep-dipped and acting on orders of the Pentagon or more likely the CIA.
As cynical as I am, once again I was not cynical enough. I had little suspicion when I read this article on him yesterday: American fighters who surrendered in Donbass speak to RT
Why, he really just sort of wandered into the whole thing:
Drueke, who left the US military in 2014, initially set out for Ukraine without a clear plan. Flying to Poland with the intention of doing humanitarian work, he nevertheless brought military gear and said that he was prepared to fight....
Ah, just a drifter, with time and money enough to fly to Eastern Europe on an indefinite trip. Like so many of our ex-servicemen, eh?
Then this caught my eye, but I chalked it up to lax reporting:
The two veterans – Drueke served two tours with the US Army in Iraq while Huynh worked in logistics for the Marine Corps in Okinawa, Japan....
No mention of what Drueke did. Did the reporter not ask? Did Drueke decline to specify? Truck repair or clerk/typist perhaps? Now looks like probably something else, huh?
This also caught my eye but, again, I was not sufficiently suspicious:
Under the command of Ukraine’s secret police, the SBU, Huynh said that the pair were sent to cover a Ukrainian retreat.
The SBU is now commanding troops in the field? Or was it perhaps a mission of a more sensitive nature?
My suspicions are now aroused, and I very much suspect all this will not go over well at Drueke's trial.
I'll save you the reply and write it myself: "Ohhhh, you know what I meant!"
Without directly addressing how we got here, I think the first insight is to realize that the world is not how we always very reasonably assumed that it was.
To illustrate, take the example of language skills. Just in everyday interactions (and assuming you're in an English-speaking country), virtually everyone is conversant on a similar level in English. You have to encounter a foreigner who is a beginner speaker or a retarded person before you take note of the difficulties they have.
But if you're old enough to remember the advent of email, we all got a peek for the first time into everyone's written skills. Good Lord, it turned out many people are literally barely literate! They have difficulty structuring a sentence, let alone a paragraph or a full argument. And now with the advent of texting and tweeting it has managed to degrade significantly further.
This is all a long route to saying that to figure out what the hell is going on with anything in the world, we have to closely examine where we might have gone wrong in our own thinking. (And what's funny in the current context is that this is something I have yet to witness a Flat Earther doing.)
Just my $0.02, but I'm of the belief that Assange was black-bagged in October 2016 and is now in either a physical or metaphorical hole. This latest news, then, would be just part of the continuous phony spectacle that they put in front of us.
Glory to yellow journalism! Glory to what now passes for journalists!