I have found that Baal = Moloch = Lucifer = Satan = etc, and I wouldn't even claim this unless I felt I had compelling evidence to back it up. And I would relate to you any part of it, but in a way that's pointless and I'll tell you why.
If someone presents you with evidence contrary to what you currently believe, it's the easiest thing in the world to find reason to discount it. You have to defend your own position, right? Totally instinctive.
The dynamic is entirely different when you find evidence on your own. If you're expending the effort, then you're in a mindset to learn.
So what I would suggest is this: as you continue researching and encountering information, just keep the thesis in the back of your mind. When you come across something relevant, just say to yourself, "I wonder how this fits with what that jackass on the Internet said?"
Who knows, of course, but I think you may find that the pieces of the puzzle begin to fall more neatly into place.
The evidence I'm relying on is Paul in the Bible, which, yea yea, the Devil can quote scripture too, but that's pretty good evidence for talking about there being multiple demons. Hell (pun intended) do you remember Legion, the pack of demons thrown out by Jesus into the herd of swine? Or that Mary Magdeline was possessed by no less than 7 demons the Bible says.
If we are talking about demons, there are lots of them.
Oh, I completely agree there are numerous entities that we call demons. The reason I use that tortured wording is that as soon as you say "demon", it brings up all these connotations of what we think we know about them, which tends to short-circuit a rigorous study of their precise origin and nature. We are crippled if we try to battle what we incorrectly believe we understand.
At present, I'm most focused on their origin. I feel it's comfortably established that Satan commanded 200 Fallen Angels and their hybrid children were the Nephilim. This group is clearly associated with demons, but what is the exact relationship? It's a question barely studied, and when it is it's almost exclusively baseless claims and charlatans. Very poor scholarship.
It's still not at all clear, but after absorbing quite a bit of related evidence, my speculation is that when the Nephilim died, they were not able to either move on to the next realm or to reincarnate. They persist here as discarnate entities feeding on loosh, and work in concert with Satan and the Fallen Angels to obtain it.
I'm currently on the lookout for evidence to confirm or refute this. But the handful of researchers are so carried away with their own biases and in love with their own conclusions that it's very difficult to get to bare evidence. To get to it, it's like demolishing a house just to get at a bag of chips in the cabinet. Not fun.
To me it's quite clear who the Nephilim are. Where people take a wrong turn is by not referring to the original Hebrew in Gen 6. The identity of their fathers is uniformly translated as "sons of God", but this is read incorrectly in two ways.
Firstly, the singular word "God" is actually the plural Hebrew word "Elohim". It's a very long story, but the Elohim are without doubt one and the same as the Anunnaki. I find it impossible to believe that the mistranslation is anything other than a deliberate attempt to mislead us.
Secondly, everyone thinks "sons of" is referring to offspring, but this is no more than a literary expression. We know that "daughters of men" means simply human women. Even in contemporary English, no one thinks a "son of the South" has for a father several states in the southeastern US. So "bene ha'Elohim" means simply "men of the Anunnaki race".
This is all cemented by a clear understanding of the term "Nephilim" itself. It comes from the Hebrew "naphal", meaning "to fall", so it means something like "The Fallen". (Note: these are NOT the Fallen Angels, but both groups "fell".)
I don't know which of these or all of these gained them their name, but these hybrid being had "fallen" in three ways. First genetically, as they were not of pure blood. Second socially, as they were not members of Anunnaki social structure. Third physically, as they were not space-faring but confined to the Earth.
"Nephilim" is often translated as "giants", and they were indeed physical giants. It turns out giantism is a phenomenon in some genetic hybrids, like ligers for example.
More interesting and most provocative is that if you dig deeply enough, you'll find that the term was originally translated as "earthborn". But hang on, isn't everything everywhere everywhen that we know of born on Earth? So here we find the term originating where, given the scenario we're building, it would have made a difference for the first time.
One last item because I can see that they touch on it in the podcast: how could aliens or angels have interbred with humans? Well, if you just say they're angels then anything is possible. But then why do they need to bang earth girls? Or bang at all? If they're aliens, WTH are the chances they're genetically compatible? We can't bang chimps and get humanzees.
It's another very long story, but the Anunnaki created us by genetic engineering, combining their DNA with (probably) homo erectus. So we're genetically compatible because we are already partly Anunnaki.
It's a lot to take in, but all I can say is that for me, anyway, it all holds together better and is ultimately a lot simpler than the other research out there.
Thanks for the link to the podcast. I'll check it out!
I have found that Baal = Moloch = Lucifer = Satan = etc, and I wouldn't even claim this unless I felt I had compelling evidence to back it up. And I would relate to you any part of it, but in a way that's pointless and I'll tell you why.
If someone presents you with evidence contrary to what you currently believe, it's the easiest thing in the world to find reason to discount it. You have to defend your own position, right? Totally instinctive.
The dynamic is entirely different when you find evidence on your own. If you're expending the effort, then you're in a mindset to learn.
So what I would suggest is this: as you continue researching and encountering information, just keep the thesis in the back of your mind. When you come across something relevant, just say to yourself, "I wonder how this fits with what that jackass on the Internet said?"
Who knows, of course, but I think you may find that the pieces of the puzzle begin to fall more neatly into place.
The evidence I'm relying on is Paul in the Bible, which, yea yea, the Devil can quote scripture too, but that's pretty good evidence for talking about there being multiple demons. Hell (pun intended) do you remember Legion, the pack of demons thrown out by Jesus into the herd of swine? Or that Mary Magdeline was possessed by no less than 7 demons the Bible says.
If we are talking about demons, there are lots of them.
Oh, I completely agree there are numerous entities that we call demons. The reason I use that tortured wording is that as soon as you say "demon", it brings up all these connotations of what we think we know about them, which tends to short-circuit a rigorous study of their precise origin and nature. We are crippled if we try to battle what we incorrectly believe we understand.
At present, I'm most focused on their origin. I feel it's comfortably established that Satan commanded 200 Fallen Angels and their hybrid children were the Nephilim. This group is clearly associated with demons, but what is the exact relationship? It's a question barely studied, and when it is it's almost exclusively baseless claims and charlatans. Very poor scholarship.
It's still not at all clear, but after absorbing quite a bit of related evidence, my speculation is that when the Nephilim died, they were not able to either move on to the next realm or to reincarnate. They persist here as discarnate entities feeding on loosh, and work in concert with Satan and the Fallen Angels to obtain it.
I'm currently on the lookout for evidence to confirm or refute this. But the handful of researchers are so carried away with their own biases and in love with their own conclusions that it's very difficult to get to bare evidence. To get to it, it's like demolishing a house just to get at a bag of chips in the cabinet. Not fun.
What I know of the nephilim, I know from this podcast:
https://sqpn.com/2020/03/the-mysterious-nephilim-of-the-bible-aliens-angels-or-something-else/
He does provide some links to sources if you scroll down, which may be useful to you.
To me it's quite clear who the Nephilim are. Where people take a wrong turn is by not referring to the original Hebrew in Gen 6. The identity of their fathers is uniformly translated as "sons of God", but this is read incorrectly in two ways.
Firstly, the singular word "God" is actually the plural Hebrew word "Elohim". It's a very long story, but the Elohim are without doubt one and the same as the Anunnaki. I find it impossible to believe that the mistranslation is anything other than a deliberate attempt to mislead us.
Secondly, everyone thinks "sons of" is referring to offspring, but this is no more than a literary expression. We know that "daughters of men" means simply human women. Even in contemporary English, no one thinks a "son of the South" has for a father several states in the southeastern US. So "bene ha'Elohim" means simply "men of the Anunnaki race".
This is all cemented by a clear understanding of the term "Nephilim" itself. It comes from the Hebrew "naphal", meaning "to fall", so it means something like "The Fallen". (Note: these are NOT the Fallen Angels, but both groups "fell".)
I don't know which of these or all of these gained them their name, but these hybrid being had "fallen" in three ways. First genetically, as they were not of pure blood. Second socially, as they were not members of Anunnaki social structure. Third physically, as they were not space-faring but confined to the Earth.
"Nephilim" is often translated as "giants", and they were indeed physical giants. It turns out giantism is a phenomenon in some genetic hybrids, like ligers for example.
More interesting and most provocative is that if you dig deeply enough, you'll find that the term was originally translated as "earthborn". But hang on, isn't everything everywhere everywhen that we know of born on Earth? So here we find the term originating where, given the scenario we're building, it would have made a difference for the first time.
One last item because I can see that they touch on it in the podcast: how could aliens or angels have interbred with humans? Well, if you just say they're angels then anything is possible. But then why do they need to bang earth girls? Or bang at all? If they're aliens, WTH are the chances they're genetically compatible? We can't bang chimps and get humanzees.
It's another very long story, but the Anunnaki created us by genetic engineering, combining their DNA with (probably) homo erectus. So we're genetically compatible because we are already partly Anunnaki.
It's a lot to take in, but all I can say is that for me, anyway, it all holds together better and is ultimately a lot simpler than the other research out there.
Thanks for the link to the podcast. I'll check it out!