we are preparing to make the right
a) We represents a corruption of light aka an accumulation of rays casting shadows over one another.
b) Preparing implies towards outcome; being (ray) implies in response to origin (light). Preparation for outcome neglects adaptation to origin.
c) Right/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies light moving each ray within a straight line...not something one makes, but everything allowing each thing to re-make self.
judgments
"Judge not lest ye be judged"...judgement implies confinement aka holding onto a verdict, while ignoring that free will of choice needs to adapt to justice by deciding...not confine self to decisions.
Balance implies just; choice implies at odds with one another.
confronting the light
Con (together) front (to project, stand out)...light projects ray by dividing each to stand out from one another. Few suggest CON to tempt many together, hence casting darkness about one another, while preventing projection with retraction.
Joining one another retracts self. Being a transference within light implies a projection of self.
ability to judge
Nature enabling being...that's justice. Beings judging one another disables many under few, hence establishing a court (enclosure) of justice. A sentence passed represents a sentience ignored. Ignorance represents mental confinement aka an enclosure.
when it happens
A happenstance implies by chance; being implies choice by balance. Taking a chance ignores choice given.
there is a choice
Only HERE (balance) can choice be used...THERE (imbalance) implies an option presented to choice by the choice of another.
IS implies optional, WAS implies primary...God was before any being within can suggest to one another what God is.
NDEs give...
a) All was given to each one within...NDEs are shared among one another to distract from all given.
b) Near (close by not distant) tempts one to ignore that DI (to divide) STANT (stance) implies ones living stance within the dividing process of dying.
There's no "near death"...only living within process of dying, hence life in-between inception and death. Near vs far represents a cyclical conflict about measurements taken, while ignoring a linear procession one cannot take into possession.
Therefore OP is about (1) trusting versus (2) distrusting
Aka a cyclical conflict of reason distracting from linear (inception towards death) procession of potential (life).
Should you go towards the light?
a) Should implies "obligation" (a binding pledge); light implies "necessity" (a setting free)...few suggest should to keep many in the dark (ignorance) about light (discernment).
b) Light > spectrum > ray...light can only move forwards. It's each ray animated to resist, which can be tempted to follow along by ignoring to resist.
Is it heaven?
Light sets each ray free from one another...resisting the temptation to come together represents heaven (heave; to rise), while coming together represents hell (kel; to cover).
A trap?
Light sets free...ignoring light by free will of choice traps ones free will of choice. Ignorance represents darkness and confinement.
Soul-recycler?
Light implies soul/sole (one and only) hence moving through each ray within. It's ignoring light which mentally (logic) and physically (reason) confines one within a cycle.
If one responses to a cycle, then one ignores being delineated within light.
A vagina?
Light > spectrum > ray aka male > female > offspring...it's the off-spring divided from one another (penis + vagina) which can have intercourse with one another for more off-spring from one another.
What the light and what should you do?
Light implies all; each ray within needs to adapt to all, while resisting the wanted temptations of one another...like suggested "should" (a binding pledge of obligation).
Death...The Living Feel It Too
Feel/fall aka the process of dying for each rising life within. The issue here...DEATH suggested as outcome instead of DYING perceived as being processed from origin towards outcome.
How To Counter...Media
A medium (life) adapts to extremes (inception towards death)...counting holds a medium accountable by another. Accountable as in counter; noun - "table where a money lender does business; table or bench of a merchant or bank".
Weaponized Social Media
Each beings weapon of choice represents a separated medium formed within flowing extremes...social aka soc (together) i (within) al (all) inverts separation.
The way they weaponized it is by filling it
Way implies fall (inception towards death) for each rising (life) weapon (choice) within...it's the minds of those ignoring to rise which others fill up with ballast (literally belly-load) aka the belly of ba'al.
first turn
- First...line (inception towards death)
- Second...delineation (life)
Only during delineation can one turn within all to shape a circle.
don't give them your fear
Fear implies holding onto a make believe dread about an outcome one hasn't reached yet. It's ones free will of choice binding itself to imagination, which others are shaping by invocation.
they will flee
Will implies form; flee implies flow...only within flow can form be shaped by separation from one another. Suggested pluralism (they) tempts singular (one) being to ignore flow, while shirking will to another.
own Life Energy
Energy sets life free...owning tempts life to bind itself while wasting energy in the process of possession.
That ain't put together (constructed) by divided from one another aka that from this; minor from major; of from on; one from all; fiction from reality.
"In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth" aka generation by division...not construction.
Which construct isn't man made?
You love marking...
Mark/merg - "boundary, border"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/mark
Love vs hate represent the artificial borders ones free will of choice marks if choosing a side. As long as one holds onto a side...so long does one remain marked. Analyzing this shapes clarity within oneself.
Farmer (Bauer in German) aka the name used before the "Rothschild" relabeling...
even here as a supposed conspiracy forum
Any artificial place of assembly (forum) puts many at odds with one another.
the heliocentric deception
Each being represents the center (centric) of light (helio)...the more beings incline towards another; the more deceptive appearances become.
enough evidence
Evidence aka ex (outwards) videre (to see) implies ones perception within all perceivable...enough aka en (within) nough (to reach, attain) implies the suggestions of one another tempting one to reach outwards from center into circumference, hence off-center and away from ones helio-centric position.
Being implies one within all...enough represents a measurement taken by one while ignoring all given.
If hunger and thirst implies all moving through each one; then eating and drinking can never be "enough"...
to prove beyond any doubt
Holding onto proof casts doubt over ones mind/memory. Proof is in the pudding/putting aka within motion putting matter into being.
Beyond (on the other side) tempts one to ignore being (life) in-BE-tween sides (inception towards death)...looking for beyond casts doubt over ones sight.
it's highly unlikely that Mars
Is vs isn't aka high vs low aka likely vs unlikely...that's mars; the god of war aka mars/mar - "to deface, disfigure; impair in form or substance".
Facing another within any conflict of reason defaces oneself.
What evidence would you amass that is NOT circumstantial?
a) Evidence aka ex (outwards) videre (to see) implies each being at center seeing outwards circumference. The only thing not circumstantial is center.
b) Center within circumference implies fraction of whole...amassing from the circumference corrupts the fraction.
Israel has undue influence over the media
Media implies "middle" aka center of circumference. A jew mediates for gentiles to gain influence over an artificial center called consensus. Any gentile joining a consensus is stuck withing an artificial circumference, while being off-center in nature.
In other words...center (perception) within circumference (perceivable) can be tempted off-center by mediated suggestion. Consenting to any suggestion makes one owned by right of circumstance aka "due".
Furthermore...israel aka yisra'el (he that striveth with God) implies center resisting the temptation of circumference.
Israel has the motive,
He that strives with God is moved by; within and in response to God. God implies the only motive force...
A jew tricks gentiles to believe that israel is a fixed place somewhere, while ignoring that it implies each beings moved position within a moving nature.
voting makes little sense. Your vote has, mathematically, about the same chance as
Voting implies ones choice taking a chance...that's what distorts sense, while permitting others to mathematically take choice out of the equation.
You can want the things that you need and deserve.
a) Only within need can a want be shaped.
b) Things (plural) implies want...need implies singularity. For example God as the singular need for any plurality of want within.
c) Deserve implies the division of all served (need) through each one within (want) , hence want being in servitude to need.
Stop being a pedant.
a) Need cannot be stopped...the cessation of motion represents a want in ignorance of needing to adapt to being (life) moved (inception towards death).
b) To learn for self implies teaching self and vice versa...with nature as the only pedagogue for each being within.
Few mislead many as students under teachers aka as slaves under masters...which represents the artifical corruption of natural pedagogy.
Peda (child) gogy (to drive, draw out or forth, move)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/pedagogue That's how nature draws out each child of being.
Want your God given rights? You may be an extremist!
God given implies "need"...wanting something tempts one to the extreme aka the farthest away from need.
13
There can be only one.
bloodlines
Blood flows.
a pact
Pacts congeal form within flow.
nephelim
The fallen ones are formed within flow.
you worship Satan
How does analysis worship deception?
are insane
Aka in (within) sanus (sound) aka being of sound mind aka being a mind (ment) structured (stru) within (in)...it's synthesis which distorts this.
My respect for you is negative
Negation implies within self not upon another, hence negative/negatif - "expressing denial"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/negative
Starting a sentence with "I'm not" implies negation of self...which free-will-of-choice by sound mind analyzed.
negative, which is the proper form
Proper implies put forwards aka flow (inception towards death) putting forwards form (life)...negation implies denial of proposition.
I can not...
...again with the denial of self.
higher levels
There can only be one balance (level/libra) for each ones free will of choice within. High vs low implies imbalance of choice.
you are a deceiver
Do you think that analysis (setting apart) deceives (mislead by false appearance or statement) from synthesis (putting together)?
seeding ill will
Will (want) can only be seeded within the soil of need. Trying to plant will within another makes one ill.
subversion
SUB (under) VERS (to turn)...consenting to any suggestion turns one under (logic) and against (reason) one another.
ION (action) moves straight through reaction...subversion can only be shaped during diversion from ones path (inception towards death) of life.
understanding
Standing under implies subversion. If one stands under (sub) another, then one turned (vers) from all (ion).
Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person...
Audio only...
"Cause it's the deepest impulse of a jewish soul to pull at the very fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread. They want nothing but nothingness...nothingness without end" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRUjy1Dhx-k
Putting words in other people mouths
Free-will-of-choice takes apart (analysis) words put together (synthesis) out of the mouths of others.
shielding yourself in gospel
Spelling (good or bad) binds free will of choice. It's taking apart spellcraft which represents shield/skel - "divide, split, separate"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/shield
Just as I would expect
Expectation implies ones deference of action aka waiting for outcome, while ignoring adaptation to origin. That's injustice to Gods justice.
If God gives all (perceivable) to each one (perception), then why would one expect from one another (suggestion)?
a disciple of the great deceiver.
A disciple implies one who follows another like you and your expectation, which deceives you from being a recipient of God.
Free-will-of-choice struggles to free oneself from deception by resisting the temptation of following another into deeper deception.
to block the average Joe from God
a) Consenting to a suggestion blocks ones perception.
b) God bringing into being implies outstanding growth...few tempt many together to establish an average (equal share of loss).
to make it in life on his own.
Living implies in response to the process of dying...few tempt many to ignore this by suggesting that whatever is made can be owned.
A potential (life) within a process (inception towards death) looses charge if taking anything into possession.
The secret to their method...besides spreading tons of confusion
Confusion implies fusing together...secret/seco (to divide) contradicts that. God divines/divides being, hence the christening (to anoint) of each from one another.
This way you are so focused on thinking and acting, you don't have a moment of silence throughout your day.
a) There can be only one way (inception towards death) for each one within (life), which represents the moment(um) of motion for each matter.
b) Natural sound implies silence; articulation of words implies noise.
- People talking without speaking
- People hearing without listening
- People writing songs that voices never shared
- No one dared...disturb the sound of silence
the soul connects to God
God implies soul/sole moving towards and through each divided being. Few suggest con (together) nect (to bind) to tempt many into bondage.
Soul implies spiritual animation of essence...not connection.
was created in the image of God.
a) Creationism was suggested by a jew (creatio ex nihilo) to capture the imagination of gentiles within denial of God.
b) "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image"...God implies grave (for reception of a dead body) for each animated life within.
The opposite of imagination (suggestion) implies sensibility (perception)...
The bit of consciousness
Con (together) scious (to perceive) implies a sum...not a bit.
like an "atom"
No one is alike atom/adam....for adam implies "the one formed from the ground". Here's your atom... https://img.gvid.tv/i/USQNfkcC.jpg
can only be found in
Being can only be within foundation...anyone suggesting that anything can be found anywhere else is tempting one into a deception.
The past and future have to be forgotten
What about the present aka ones presence?
The soul is connected back to God so thinking is not required
The one and only soul/sole God animating each one within implies the act (cause) producing (effect) mental activity aka thinking.
It's thinking in words which corrupts each being of sound mind. It's consenting to any suggested words which draws connections within ones mind/memory. It's consent from within which permits animation from without...representing the anthropomorphic golem.
the key to success
Success implies outcome...coming into being implies animation from within origin. It's ignoring origin for outcome which locks a being, while permitting another to function as the instrument for opening locks (key)...yet there's always another locked door behind any key to success.
we are connecting to God directly
Connection (synthesis) contradicts direction (analysis)...few suggest pluralism (we) to synthesize many, while distracting each from analysis.
what happens when the masses reconnect
Exponential amassing aka a malignant tumor (cancer). From the christian perspective called ecclesiam malignantum (followers of the antichrist). To christen implies separation by anointment from one another...
I'm not...
Using I AM NOTHING as the foundation of ones response while calling another satanist...
"Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath NOTHING IN ME." ~John 14:30
Sulfurmaxxing
Sulfur/soufr (fire and brimstone, hellfire) from sulphur (to burn)...how about chillin' out, maxin', relaxin all cool instead?
it's the availability
Does nature give being free will of choice? If so, then what does nature not make available to a beings free will of choice?
EnergyGalore
If energy is galore (sufficient enough) for any power within, then why would the powers that be bring availability into question?
three supply chains
What if there's only one line (inception towards death) of supply for each being (life) within, while a beings free will of choice can be chained to one another...like one's choice to a chosen one?
If energy sets power free, then does the chaining of power require ones FREE will of choice?
a) Wake/weg - "to be lively" implies the process of dying for each living being within the WEG (way).
b) Before vs after represents a circular conflict distracting from linear procession aka be (being) fore (forwarded) + aft (off, away).
Being (life) forwarded (inception towards death) within a way...that isn't a conflict, but ones mind can be tricked to view it as such.