Lol, what. Im three minutes in and its mostly been about jews and their stellar contributions to society and something about jews in america leaning left, and some modern campaigns being funded by jews and modern quaker groups. Then he says it was quakers who essentially decided you could decide what sex you are.
Umm what.
It was mostly about anti government, anti slavery. It had nothing to do with deciding what pronoun you use.
I feel pretty confident about this since my ancestor was part of this movement. Which ive pointed out in kia2, I guess that makes me part communist too since early colonial america was ran like a social commune. Which is exactly what they did in ancient frisia 2000 years ago. Community > than money or individual status. The anti thesis to royalty I suppose.
In Bowden’s History of the Society of Friends in America, it is mentioned that “two English Friends, named Christopher Holden and John Copeland came to Sandwhich on the 20th of the 6th month” of 1657[36] and there they found friends of toleration and resisters of an oppressive law in Daniel Wing, the son of John Wing and Deborah Bachiler, and grandson of Stephen Bachiler. Daniel Wing and his brother Stephen Wing and others resisted an oppressive law in the town of Sandwhich which publicly punished men and women by whipping, for “meetings at private houses, for encouraging others in holding meetings, for entertaining the preachers and for the unworthy speeches”. By 1658, Daniel Wing, with others who acted with him, became active converts and there were 18 families who recorded their names in the documents of the society. Writers of 1658-1660 said “We have two strong places in this land, the one at Newport and the other at Sandwhich; almost the whole town of Sandwhich is adhering towards them” and the records of the Monthly Meetings of Friends show that the Sandwhich Monthly Meeting was the first established in America.[37]
Those values that drove quakers to stand for the freedom of everyone and not just the rich, are still alive in their descendants today. Has nothing to do with promoting personal agendas and is more about following the spirit of god that exists in all of us. Funny thing for a agnostic to say, I know.
I also thought it was funny a british guy hating quakers though, since they prolly blame people like my ancestors for losing america.
After learning about ancient frisia, i have very little doubt thats where the wing family came from. The name itself being a testament of their faith.
3 minutes is not much time to judge from. I'm not saying I stand by the video's accuracy, but you didn't disprove anything that was said. They aren't claiming that all quakers are bad, but that their views led to ways of thinking similar to wokeness and that wokeness today is still supported by big quaker groups.
Has nothing to do with promoting personal agendas and is more about following the spirit of god that exists in all of us.
"Following the spirit" is a common excuse for supposedly religious people to impose their personal agendas. The video talks about that.
The Quakers were niche Protestant denomination that eventually died out.
The origins of today’s leftism, aside from flaws in human nature itself, comes from every man being the sole arbiter of his own morality and interpretation of scripture.
The secret cult of generational Satanists I have come to name the "Salem Witches" were heavily bound up in Quakerism, although I have yet to discern in precisely what way.
I completely discount the idea that this particular small group held any religion to heart other than what we might crudely call Satanism (there is a long story attached). My best guess, and the lines along which I would investigate if I ever get there, is that they created (or infiltrated and subverted) a sect that they could entirely control.
As for George Fox, I have no doubt he was one of these Satanists. There were, in fact, three Foxes--Hannah, Jabez, and Rebecca--involved in the fake Salem Witch Trials.
Just a simple search for "george fox salem witch trials" yields as the first result:
There is a people not so rigid as others are at Boston and there are great desires among them after the Truth. Some there are, as I hear, convinced who meet in silence at a place called Salem."-Henry Fell (in a letter dated 1656) June 27, 1658
So when I read that Professor Dutton titled his book, The Quaker Question: Exposing the Sect That Really Rules the World, I am not at all surprised. If only the professor had any idea how deep it really goes.
a) Motion implies the origin of balance (left/right) for each matter given choice within.
b) -ism implies a consensus among choices who chose one side (leftism) over another side (rightism) or vice versa. Choosing to hold onto either side implies imbalance (left vs right).
c) An imbalanced choice "shakes; trembles; shudders; violently convulses; frightens" aka experiences the tremulous agitation of a quake.
d) "And so terrible was the sight, that Moses said, I exceedingly fear and quake" ~Hebrews 12:21
Choosing to let go of fear stabilizes choice within balance. Few shape signs to tempt many to hold within sight what they love or fear.
e) Quakers aka Society of Friends implies the establishment of friend vs foe aka love vs hate aka hope vs fear aka right vs left conflict ...if one chooses to join together (soc) within (i) all (al).
The opposite of social implies "personal; private; special; particular; unique; diverse etc."...it's choosing one side over another which tempts many together under few.
No, it predates them.
Leftism is old, it just pretends to be new because idiots want new things.
Lol, what. Im three minutes in and its mostly been about jews and their stellar contributions to society and something about jews in america leaning left, and some modern campaigns being funded by jews and modern quaker groups. Then he says it was quakers who essentially decided you could decide what sex you are.
Umm what.
It was mostly about anti government, anti slavery. It had nothing to do with deciding what pronoun you use.
I feel pretty confident about this since my ancestor was part of this movement. Which ive pointed out in kia2, I guess that makes me part communist too since early colonial america was ran like a social commune. Which is exactly what they did in ancient frisia 2000 years ago. Community > than money or individual status. The anti thesis to royalty I suppose.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Quakers
Those values that drove quakers to stand for the freedom of everyone and not just the rich, are still alive in their descendants today. Has nothing to do with promoting personal agendas and is more about following the spirit of god that exists in all of us. Funny thing for a agnostic to say, I know.
I also thought it was funny a british guy hating quakers though, since they prolly blame people like my ancestors for losing america.
After learning about ancient frisia, i have very little doubt thats where the wing family came from. The name itself being a testament of their faith.
3 minutes is not much time to judge from. I'm not saying I stand by the video's accuracy, but you didn't disprove anything that was said. They aren't claiming that all quakers are bad, but that their views led to ways of thinking similar to wokeness and that wokeness today is still supported by big quaker groups.
"Following the spirit" is a common excuse for supposedly religious people to impose their personal agendas. The video talks about that.
The Quakers were niche Protestant denomination that eventually died out.
The origins of today’s leftism, aside from flaws in human nature itself, comes from every man being the sole arbiter of his own morality and interpretation of scripture.
The secret cult of generational Satanists I have come to name the "Salem Witches" were heavily bound up in Quakerism, although I have yet to discern in precisely what way.
I completely discount the idea that this particular small group held any religion to heart other than what we might crudely call Satanism (there is a long story attached). My best guess, and the lines along which I would investigate if I ever get there, is that they created (or infiltrated and subverted) a sect that they could entirely control.
As for George Fox, I have no doubt he was one of these Satanists. There were, in fact, three Foxes--Hannah, Jabez, and Rebecca--involved in the fake Salem Witch Trials.
Just a simple search for "george fox salem witch trials" yields as the first result:
My Quaker ancestors: A Story of the Early Quaker Trials (Ancestry Archives 3/22/2015)
So when I read that Professor Dutton titled his book, The Quaker Question: Exposing the Sect That Really Rules the World, I am not at all surprised. If only the professor had any idea how deep it really goes.
a) Motion implies the origin of balance (left/right) for each matter given choice within.
b) -ism implies a consensus among choices who chose one side (leftism) over another side (rightism) or vice versa. Choosing to hold onto either side implies imbalance (left vs right).
c) An imbalanced choice "shakes; trembles; shudders; violently convulses; frightens" aka experiences the tremulous agitation of a quake.
d) "And so terrible was the sight, that Moses said, I exceedingly fear and quake" ~Hebrews 12:21
Choosing to let go of fear stabilizes choice within balance. Few shape signs to tempt many to hold within sight what they love or fear.
e) Quakers aka Society of Friends implies the establishment of friend vs foe aka love vs hate aka hope vs fear aka right vs left conflict ...if one chooses to join together (soc) within (i) all (al).
The opposite of social implies "personal; private; special; particular; unique; diverse etc."...it's choosing one side over another which tempts many together under few.