Too close to the aether?!?!?
(youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (2)
sorted by:
In (within) visible (perceptible to sight)...few tempt many to ignore this by suggesting that invisible implies "not perceptible to sight".
It's consenting to suggested words like "invisible", which prevents one from analyzing the implication of division. Consent implies synthesis...natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies division for analysis.
Only agitated matter within calm motion can be shocked, and only within a line (inception towards death) can a wave be raised (life).
Only during a cooling process (dying) can heated potential (living) come into being.
Division of nature into being implies tranquility...commotion among being implies turbulence.
Few suggest nothing (nihilo) to tempt many into nihil-ism and de-nial of everything perceivable aka as living within the edge of knowing as a particular ray (matter) within the visible spectrum (momentum) of whole light (motion).
Sleight of hand... https://genius.com/Aerosmith-livin-on-the-edge-lyrics
Coming into being within nature implies the refraction of light...ignoring perceivable for suggested represents the block.
Become implies "coming into being"...only within light (motion) can color (momentum) come into being (matter), which implies diffusion; not density.
Ignoring how all perceivable diffuses each ones perception, by consenting to any suggestion, establishes density within oneself.
a) Aether (motion) > spirit (momentum) > essence (matter)
b) TOO CLOSE implies essence holding onto one another; TO implies spirit moving towards essence thereby animating it; THE AETHER implies God (theos) moving (aether) spirit through essence.