Something I've never heard anyone mention: A couple of months ago when I looked into Polymarket personally--as in how it ran and how to set up an account--I read on their site that they did not allow accounts based in the US. I didn't even try to set one up.
They seemed to be serious about it, too, not just some wink-and-a-nod thing. It was more like, "We got in trouble with the CFTC back in 2022 and we won't risk that again."
But here we are and everyone's talking about Polymarket. Corbett discusses insider trading as something NO ONE is talking about, but doesn't mention that no Americans are supposed to be doing this in the first place as something NO ONE is talking about. Strange.
While Polymarket said its new surveillance technology is going to safeguard its not-fully-launched U.S. exchange, it didn’t specify whether the tools would also be used to protect its separate international prediction market exchange, where about 98% of the company’s total betting volume and almost all of its controversy comes from.
There's another note about that surveillance technology. Corbett mentions that Admiral Poindexter was the head of DARPA back in 2003 when the idea of something like Polymarket came up and was shot down. He notes that Poindexter was later involved in the founding of much-maligned Palantir. Of course Corbett is aware of such things because he's one of the deepest and most thorough researchers out there, isn't he?
Well, he seems to have missed the news from 2026. From that same Sportico article:
Polymarket announced new integrity monitoring tools and procedures last month, highlighted by a partnership with data software firm Palantir enabling “world-class surveillance” of sports bets.
Deep and thorough researcher James Corbett always seems to have us looking deeply and thoroughly at the wrong things, which is perhaps why James Corbett is flourishing.
Thanks for pointing out the additional connection between Polymarket and Palantir. I think that supports what Corbett was saying, so how is it a sign he's misdirecting people?
Call it an unwitting limited hangout. Which do you think "They" would rather have people contemplating?:
(1) A mysterious figure had some tenuous association over two decades ago to the germ of an idea, and who years after that had some possibly incidental connection to an organization that is endlessly flogged in conspiracy theory circles as being involved in dark doings, but is only important because it serves to demonize the reviled enemy Donald J. Trump.
(2) Palantir is recording and analyzing every single thing you're doing on Polymarket. Everything.
As I've pointed out before, shitty research is it's own form of disinformation. "They" know this well and "They" know how ignorant and unwary people are of such dynamics.
a) Nature doesn't poly/pere - "to fill" itself with being...nature offloads each being from one another, hence giving each being free will of choice.
b) The opposite of poly (plural) implies uni (singular)...each jew tempts gentiles together into a plurality; which nature offloads, while giving each jew singular advantage (free) over disadvantaged (bound) gentiles.
c) Market/merg - "boundary, border" implies ones free will of choice binding self to another aka uni (ones choice) joining poly (consensus).
Something I've never heard anyone mention: A couple of months ago when I looked into Polymarket personally--as in how it ran and how to set up an account--I read on their site that they did not allow accounts based in the US. I didn't even try to set one up.
They seemed to be serious about it, too, not just some wink-and-a-nod thing. It was more like, "We got in trouble with the CFTC back in 2022 and we won't risk that again."
But here we are and everyone's talking about Polymarket. Corbett discusses insider trading as something NO ONE is talking about, but doesn't mention that no Americans are supposed to be doing this in the first place as something NO ONE is talking about. Strange.
Here is a recent summary of the picture:
POLYMARKET REBELS STILL BETTING IN BANNED COUNTRIES USING VPNS (Sportico 4/7/2026)
There's another note about that surveillance technology. Corbett mentions that Admiral Poindexter was the head of DARPA back in 2003 when the idea of something like Polymarket came up and was shot down. He notes that Poindexter was later involved in the founding of much-maligned Palantir. Of course Corbett is aware of such things because he's one of the deepest and most thorough researchers out there, isn't he?
Well, he seems to have missed the news from 2026. From that same Sportico article:
Deep and thorough researcher James Corbett always seems to have us looking deeply and thoroughly at the wrong things, which is perhaps why James Corbett is flourishing.
Thanks for pointing out the additional connection between Polymarket and Palantir. I think that supports what Corbett was saying, so how is it a sign he's misdirecting people?
Call it an unwitting limited hangout. Which do you think "They" would rather have people contemplating?:
(1) A mysterious figure had some tenuous association over two decades ago to the germ of an idea, and who years after that had some possibly incidental connection to an organization that is endlessly flogged in conspiracy theory circles as being involved in dark doings, but is only important because it serves to demonize the reviled enemy Donald J. Trump.
(2) Palantir is recording and analyzing every single thing you're doing on Polymarket. Everything.
As I've pointed out before, shitty research is it's own form of disinformation. "They" know this well and "They" know how ignorant and unwary people are of such dynamics.
a) Nature doesn't poly/pere - "to fill" itself with being...nature offloads each being from one another, hence giving each being free will of choice.
b) The opposite of poly (plural) implies uni (singular)...each jew tempts gentiles together into a plurality; which nature offloads, while giving each jew singular advantage (free) over disadvantaged (bound) gentiles.
c) Market/merg - "boundary, border" implies ones free will of choice binding self to another aka uni (ones choice) joining poly (consensus).