Deterrence aka de (to divide) + terrence (to frighten)
Being implies in-between division...fear implies leaning towards suggested outcome, while ignoring perceivable origin.
Palantir
Palantir aka palan (far) tir (to watch over)
If one tries to understand suggested information by holding it near (within memory); then one permits another to watch over one from afar.
technocratic
If one holds onto suggested information; then one gives another the cratic/kratos (power) of techno/tekhnē (artifice). Holding onto weakens being within reality, which becomes the strength for exploitation by artifice.
Aka the all seeing eye among the eyes that cannot see all (perceivable) because they watch each other (suggested).
Any information suggested as logos (words); held as logic (circular thinking) and fought over as reason (turning against each other)...makes one near-sighted aka blind to the pharisee (far I see).
Luciferian is more accurate as satan is not a proper noun in the source texts nor is it singular; that tidbit was changed from our adversaries to some dude in a red suit nonsense by corrupted seminaries.
They made many changes to the texts suggesting they don't believe what they've written as that act is a big no no, according to the Bible.
a) Luci (light) + ferre (to carry)...all light carries forth each ray within. The separation of light into ray implies spectrum (color). It's carrying any self imposed burden from one another which obstructs (satan aka s-t-n) one into ignoring light.
Satan represents the distortion of Gods light within self aka ones lack of self discernment when consenting to any suggestion by another.
b) More implies versus less aka two sides turning against one another into a conflict, which distorts accuracy. Accuracy requires analysis (setting apart); while synthesis (putting together) establishes inaccuracy.
is not a proper
Pro (forwards) per (by) implies coming into effect by forwarding cause or from the Christian perspective...pro (creator) > per (creation). Not aka nihilo (nothing) implies suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable cause for suggested affect.
"is not" represents the satanic distortion of Gods proper way. God WAS before anyone within can suggest what IS NOT.
in the source texts
God implies source; being implies product within source...texts/teks - "to weave" implies products weaved together, while ignoring that source divides each product from one another, hence singularity.
nor is it singular
Only within singularity can a single unit choose to hold onto another, thereby establishing a "fictitious" plurality aka a distortion (satan) of singularity (God).
was changed from our adversaries to some...
God was change aka linear motion, before anyone within can choose to ad (towards) vert (to turn) one another.
Only within a line (God) can a circle (satan) be shaped...
corrupted seminaries
Semi (half) implies the division of creator into each creation aka a setting apart of whole (cause) into each partial (effect). It's ignoring this by joining a seminary which corrupts ones state of being apart from one another aka being christened (anointed).
They made many changes...
...based on ones willing ignorance of God (singularity). There can be only one flowing change (inception towards death) for each shape (life) formed within.
suggesting they don't believe
Belief implies ones consent to any suggestion; thereby affixing a distortion within ones mind, while ignoring that everything (cause) moves each thing (effect) apart from one another.
Suggestion represents articulation of temptation...consent represents the self imposed burden of sin/syn (togetherness) hence forming a consensus of many (commonwealth) under few (sovereign).
That's how distortion (satan) rules by shaping consensus (-ism) of consent (-ist), while God reveals free will of choice.
what they've written as that act
Only within a line (action) can one choose to write (reaction)...free will of choice implies reaction; NOT action.
Motion (action) > momentum (balance) > matter (choice)...only within the momentum of motion can matter react to being (life) enacted (inception towards death) upon.
according to the Bible
Fictitious accord (coming into agreement) implies ones consent to what another wrote into the bible. Real accord aka ad (forwards) cor (heart) implies the division of creation (effect) within creator (cause).
Reading a book tempts ones sight in-between covers, while reading the suggested spells crafted by another by the use of ABC aka Latin abecedary (abracadabra).
The natural alphabet aka alpha (beginning) + beta (second) implies generation of being (be-ginning) by division (second/seco - "to divide").
No offense, but that's word salad that only confuses what was written which was quite simple.
The word satan, or satanists, aka adversarIES is highly accurate as that's their job; inserting a nonsensical dude with horns in a red suit only manufactured atheists.
Con (together) fuse (to melt)...I take words apart (analysis) to dispel confusion (synthesis). It's the want to put understanding and words together which makes it look like word salad.
no offense
Nature offers all (perceivable) to each being (perception)...suggested offers tempt one to withhold perception.
what was written which was quite simple.
Sound implies simplicity; words represent complexity aka letter > word > meaning > exchange....
The word satan
God implies sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all"...words represent the articulation of natural sound, which tempts each consenting being into adversary to one another.
Only within sound can an instrument (mind structured within) shape words...
satanists
-ist (satanist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (satanism) aka the synthesis of consent (singular) into consensus (plural).
that's their job
Job implies a piece (effect) of work (cause) aka the internal division of singularity (energy) into each single unit (power).
All energy implies the cause for each empowered effect within. Using words to label that process represents a synthesis turning effect into affect.
nonsensical
Can one sense nothing (non)? If non implies the absence of; then how could there be any absence within God?
What if absence implies ones "abstaining sense" when denying perception for suggestion? And what if de-nial/nihilo implies "nothing"?
Being implies in-between division...fear implies leaning towards suggested outcome, while ignoring perceivable origin.
If one tries to understand suggested information by holding it near (within memory); then one permits another to watch over one from afar.
If one holds onto suggested information; then one gives another the cratic/kratos (power) of techno/tekhnē (artifice). Holding onto weakens being within reality, which becomes the strength for exploitation by artifice.
Palantir is the eye of Sauron/Saturn/Satan that the Epstein pedo cabal worships!
Aka the all seeing eye among the eyes that cannot see all (perceivable) because they watch each other (suggested).
Any information suggested as logos (words); held as logic (circular thinking) and fought over as reason (turning against each other)...makes one near-sighted aka blind to the pharisee (far I see).
Luciferian is more accurate as satan is not a proper noun in the source texts nor is it singular; that tidbit was changed from our adversaries to some dude in a red suit nonsense by corrupted seminaries.
They made many changes to the texts suggesting they don't believe what they've written as that act is a big no no, according to the Bible.
a) Luci (light) + ferre (to carry)...all light carries forth each ray within. The separation of light into ray implies spectrum (color). It's carrying any self imposed burden from one another which obstructs (satan aka s-t-n) one into ignoring light.
Satan represents the distortion of Gods light within self aka ones lack of self discernment when consenting to any suggestion by another.
b) More implies versus less aka two sides turning against one another into a conflict, which distorts accuracy. Accuracy requires analysis (setting apart); while synthesis (putting together) establishes inaccuracy.
Pro (forwards) per (by) implies coming into effect by forwarding cause or from the Christian perspective...pro (creator) > per (creation). Not aka nihilo (nothing) implies suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable cause for suggested affect.
"is not" represents the satanic distortion of Gods proper way. God WAS before anyone within can suggest what IS NOT.
God implies source; being implies product within source...texts/teks - "to weave" implies products weaved together, while ignoring that source divides each product from one another, hence singularity.
Only within singularity can a single unit choose to hold onto another, thereby establishing a "fictitious" plurality aka a distortion (satan) of singularity (God).
God was change aka linear motion, before anyone within can choose to ad (towards) vert (to turn) one another.
Only within a line (God) can a circle (satan) be shaped...
Semi (half) implies the division of creator into each creation aka a setting apart of whole (cause) into each partial (effect). It's ignoring this by joining a seminary which corrupts ones state of being apart from one another aka being christened (anointed).
...based on ones willing ignorance of God (singularity). There can be only one flowing change (inception towards death) for each shape (life) formed within.
Belief implies ones consent to any suggestion; thereby affixing a distortion within ones mind, while ignoring that everything (cause) moves each thing (effect) apart from one another.
Suggestion represents articulation of temptation...consent represents the self imposed burden of sin/syn (togetherness) hence forming a consensus of many (commonwealth) under few (sovereign).
That's how distortion (satan) rules by shaping consensus (-ism) of consent (-ist), while God reveals free will of choice.
Only within a line (action) can one choose to write (reaction)...free will of choice implies reaction; NOT action.
Motion (action) > momentum (balance) > matter (choice)...only within the momentum of motion can matter react to being (life) enacted (inception towards death) upon.
Fictitious accord (coming into agreement) implies ones consent to what another wrote into the bible. Real accord aka ad (forwards) cor (heart) implies the division of creation (effect) within creator (cause).
Reading a book tempts ones sight in-between covers, while reading the suggested spells crafted by another by the use of ABC aka Latin abecedary (abracadabra).
The natural alphabet aka alpha (beginning) + beta (second) implies generation of being (be-ginning) by division (second/seco - "to divide").
No offense, but that's word salad that only confuses what was written which was quite simple.
The word satan, or satanists, aka adversarIES is highly accurate as that's their job; inserting a nonsensical dude with horns in a red suit only manufactured atheists.
Con (together) fuse (to melt)...I take words apart (analysis) to dispel confusion (synthesis). It's the want to put understanding and words together which makes it look like word salad.
Nature offers all (perceivable) to each being (perception)...suggested offers tempt one to withhold perception.
Sound implies simplicity; words represent complexity aka letter > word > meaning > exchange....
God implies sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all"...words represent the articulation of natural sound, which tempts each consenting being into adversary to one another.
Only within sound can an instrument (mind structured within) shape words...
-ist (satanist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (satanism) aka the synthesis of consent (singular) into consensus (plural).
Job implies a piece (effect) of work (cause) aka the internal division of singularity (energy) into each single unit (power).
All energy implies the cause for each empowered effect within. Using words to label that process represents a synthesis turning effect into affect.
Can one sense nothing (non)? If non implies the absence of; then how could there be any absence within God?
What if absence implies ones "abstaining sense" when denying perception for suggestion? And what if de-nial/nihilo implies "nothing"?