Thanks for pointing out the additional connection between Polymarket and Palantir. I think that supports what Corbett was saying, so how is it a sign he's misdirecting people?

3 minutes is not much time to judge from. I'm not saying I stand by the video's accuracy, but you didn't disprove anything that was said. They aren't claiming that all quakers are bad, but that their views led to ways of thinking similar to wokeness and that wokeness today is still supported by big quaker groups.

Has nothing to do with promoting personal agendas and is more about following the spirit of god that exists in all of us.

"Following the spirit" is a common excuse for supposedly religious people to impose their personal agendas. The video talks about that.

Yes.

Thanks. I'm catching up on their videos.

Video embed wasn't working so had to link to the mp4. The video page is here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/2aKlmk9pv6c

If the video isn't working, try these links:

• https://cdn.videy.co/8f2f25e11.mp4
• https://streamable.com/0xj1ni (slightly better quality but only up for 2 days)

Clipped from full hour long video (around 49 minutes): https://www.bitchute.com/video/jmhFAjqbxnQ

Europol report: https://www.europol.europa.eu/cms/sites/default/files/documents/The-Unmanned-Future-Report.pdf

Not only does this word salad make no sense but that image looks very dull and depressing. It also looks like a video game not totally realistic.

I'm not suggesting it was a hallucination but that you could have both seen an illusion created by the light and shadows. If the light didn't change then perhaps it disappeared as your eyes adjusted. There are optical illusions where you can see a person one second then see a different figure and lose the person and have difficulty seeing it the first way again. Or it could have been a ghost for all I know.

I see. So is it possible there were just some shadows and things that looked like a boy in the dark? Until there was a change to the electronic light, trees casting shadows moved or you and your girlfriend moving?

How dark was it?

I think you meant cult, not occult.

That's what I'm talking about. There's only a few that are controlled by governments who put measures in place to prevent misuse. (Although several times they were still almost launched) If instead everyone had them then we'd be extinct real fast.

The only reason it hasn't happened yet is because only big governments have access to nukes and none of those are dumb enough to risk annihilation in using them. If everyone had nukes or even 1% of people had personal nukes it would be a completely different story.

I think if you live in the middle of nowhere and there isn't something like nuclear fallout preventing health crops and rainwater then you can make it without even a lot of preparation. Humans never needed anything more than stone tools to get by in non-extreme climates unless there was a famine or war. If you don't live in the middle of nowhere you are basically going to be in the war scenario unless you manage to get to nowhere and either know how to hunt/forage or have seeds and are fortunate enough to get there at the right time of year. But of course if there are killer robots or a genetically modified virus to deal with that changes the equation.

I'm not disagreeing with you (assuming your bunker is noticeable or you told people about it) but you spoke as if you've been through the apocalypse several times before

always the first ones to get looted and die

How many times have you done this before?

Time to relocate to private and anonymous systems only or move offline and start preparing your underground bunker and food supplies and building a small community doing the same.

I'd much rather have my clothes lightly patted than be taken aside for questioning. I don't support any of it though. Normally a warrant is needed before a search and we have innocence until proven guilty. There can be a choice between flights with invasive security checks and those without, but governments like force not choice. That would also expose the fact that security checks do practically nothing.

Carlson is free. He was only briefly pulled aside for questioning it seems. If it was routine procedure as Israel are claiming we should be still be against government questioning, especially as a frequent procedure forced on ordinary people.

If robots are capable of taking all the jobs that means they don't need humans to function. It also means they are easily capable of subduing the world's population through their superior force and intelligence. A single AGI would also be capable of developing WMDs like a virus capable of infecting and killing every human on the planet.

The fact of the matter is there's no possible future in which AGI or billions of robots is good for humans. One lunatic with AGI makes us extinct and without AGI every government will still use robots to subjugate its people.

Always? I really don't think so. Without explicitly bringing the powers that be or systems of government into a discussion on migration it comes across as saying those things aren't to blame, only the migrants are the enemy.

It's more effective to keep the focus on the government problems than the immigrants. Problems with immigrants need to be framed as problems with the government in order to actually fix the problem and avoid the divide and conquer strategy in which you end up fighting migrants and the left and get called a racist instead of fighting the government together.

The hyper focus on immigration is a divide and conquer tactic as well as a distraction from more important subjects.

While immigration is a big problem, the people to blame are those in power, not the people migrating who are just doing what anyone else would do when given the option to live in a poor and unstable home country or a rich and stable new country handing out free stuff where immigration laws hardly apply to them. Most of the opposition to migration is complaining and protesting about the migrants rather than the government corruption that led to this. You can "elect" a new government that closes the border for a few years to pacify you but you better not question the corrupt system that will install the next government and allow it to take bribes, bribe the voters with freebies and open the borders again with zero threat of punishment.

And while the pendulum swings this way and that over immigration and ethnic factions brawl in the streets, the progress of moral erosion, transhumanism, AI, robots, the surveillance state and government corruption will continue with little opposition. Until those problems become so bad it will be too late to do anything about them because there will be a robotic boot on every individual neck.

Like I said, why do you insist on listening to liars? Just ignore them and look at the facts like those I've been talking about.

Where, who? And working with humans?

Amazon - that's who I was talking about. You can watch videos of their Kiva robots routing around each other or bringing items to humans. Still only making less important decisions like how to get from A to B while avoid crashes, but making decisions in a dynamic environment all the same, which is different from say car assembly robots that repeat the exact same action over and over.

We already have AI that suggests new chemicals as well as AlphaFold that predicts protein folding better than humans. And AI such as Kosmos that can simply be given a research question and it will spend hours designing experiments, writing programs to perform them and generate a paper presenting the method and results. It needs better accuracy, but this is how AI could replace human scientists. With a robot body physical experiments can also be performed. "Self-driving labs" are already using AI to design and perform experiments on physical materials.