they have no opposition
a) because the few suggest good vs evil to tempt the consenting many into opposing each other.
b) your consent to suggested nihilism (no) places you within such an opposition aka conflict of reason (yes vs no).
The foundation for arguing/reasoning with others is based on oneself ignoring perceivable need for wanting vs not wanting suggestions by others.
Those already within a conflict of reason are simply seeking more affirmation for their chosen side, hence others exploiting them with repetition of suggested offers. Using a bot for copy/pasting, while adding another layer of revisionism upon the suggested; represents one simply way of feeding temptation to others without exposing self to it aka "don't get high on your own supply".
All of this aside...perception cannot argue with perceivable; only ignore it for suggested. Perceivable moves; suggested tempts one to hold onto.
genome (gene-chromosome)
GENE (generation) CHROMO (color) SOMA (body)...motion generates momentum, which represents the body (spectrum of color) for each hue-man within. The frame of this spectrum implies pure light (white) and absence of light (black) in opposition to one another.
A hue-man cannot perceive white or black...only spectrum within. Other hue-man suggest black vs white to mix the spectrum in-between.
therapeutic approach
Both THERAPEUTIC (restoring health) and PROPHYLACTIC (preserving health) distract one from being disease (life) within health (inception towards death), hence being dis-ease while struggling to sustain self.
HEALTH, noun - "that state of an animal or living body, in which the parts are sound"...being implies partial instrument within sound, hence a person (Latin per sonos; by sound).
Others suggest animal and living body to distract one from living within animation.
the picture
The many aren't playing against the chosen one...they represent the pieces on both sides fighting each other within the controlled environment called reason (board). The chosen one suggests the board; the figurines; the rules, and the price for winning or losing in return for the entrance fee of ones consent.
we are being...why?
Being implies one apart from other ones...others suggest collectivism (we) to distract one from self. Mixing ones together permits ones who resist to remain apart.
How Do We Fight Back Effectively?
a) cause (inception towards death) generates effects (life)...effects fighting each other ignores cause.
b) others suggest "fight" to tempt one to want to win outcome...this distracts one from "struggle" within perceivable origin.
c) if one resists suggested (want), then one grows within perceivable (need), while diminishing the temptation of suggested.
implication, perception.
IMPLICA'TION, noun (Latin implicatio) - "the act of infolding or involving"...perceivable infolds into perception...inception towards death infolds into life...if whole; then partials within.
symbolism
Symbolism implies suggested by others; while tempting one to ignore perceivable symmetry.
metaphor
Metaphor (transferred resemblance) implies transferred in-between differences. One has to first ignore perceivable differences to be able to transfer resemblance through suggested "likeness".
riddle
Riddle (to separate) is being suggested as something to solve (dissolve), which tempts one to ignore that only within solution (inception towards death) can there be separation (life).
allusion
ALLU'DE, verb (Latin alludo) - "to refer to something not directly mentioned; to hint at by remote suggestions"...perceivable directs perception; suggestion distracts one from that.
That's pretty much based on the crater earth model by "godgevlamste"... https://rumble.com/user/Godgevlamste
Great out of the box thinker. Thanks for reminding me to catch up to his stuff. As for reflection...being partial (perception) within whole (perceivable) implies refraction within light.
secret
Being implies one apart from one another; hence segregated aka Latin secerno; secretus - "to set apart". Only apart can one discern self.
hidden in plain sight
a) suggested keeps plain sight (perceivable) hidden underneath ones ignorance.
b) a lie (suggested information) so big one cannot see (perceivable inspiration)...
- DRESS (to adjust; to put in order)
- PANT (to play with intermission or declining strength, hence gasping; panting)
Re-animate; as in re-sponding to be (life) animated by (inception towards death). Animation implies action; being within action implies being enabled to react.
order followers
Suggested orders tempt one to follow; perceivable "natural" order (inception towards death) inspires one (life) to resist.
keep
Suggested information tempts one to keep holding onto it; perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto, it needs to be let go of.
They call it a "holy bible" too...
Greek BIBLION (bible) - "a book as a division of a larger work" aka as large as WHOLE (holy).
Whole implies everything perceivable, while any suggested book binds those within to those suggesting it...if one consents.
generate some creative
Creation implies out of nothing; generation implies within everything.
nuke incoming
NUCLEUS (a nut) IN (being within) COME (coming to be)...each off-spring implies a nuke coming in. Being within implies coming to be by nuke.
sirens sound
SIREN (sea nymph who by her singing lures sailors to their destruction) SOUND (entire)...sailor aka seamen aka semen tempted by siren aka mermaid aka enticing women aka bewitching aka fascinating aka charming aka incantation.
money
Consenting to suggested money permits others to claim one as "m-one-y" aka "my one"...ones creed becomes another ones credit to spend.
story
a) consenting to a suggested story...stores...it within ones mind/memory.
b) mind/memory implies temporary storage within ongoing momentum and it's on oneself to resist the want to hold onto (suggested) within the need to let go of (perceivable).
c) motion to momentum implies wholesale for retail aka from whole (inception towards death) towards smaller quantities/partials (life).
you will never advance
a) motion brings forward (inception) and retrogresses (death) matter (life).
b) will (want) can only exist within need...one needs to resist want.
c) suggested nihilism (never) tempts one to ignore being advanced within everything. Consenting to nihilism implies holding onto (believing) nothingness, which in return tempts one to denial. Natural order cannot be denied by those within...only ignored.
knowing the difference
Knowledge (perceivable) implies moving differences. One can only perceive moving differences...others suggest sameness (e pluribus unum aka out of many one) to distract one from that.
the difference between healthy and poison
- Health (inception towards death) generates sickness (life)...sickness struggles to remain healthy.
- Remedy (inception towards death) generates poison (life)...poison dissolves within remedy unless resisting.
- sameness (inception towards death) generates differences (life).
good and wrong
Good vs bad and right vs wrong implies one reasoning over suggested, while ignoring implication (if/then) of perceivable.
Take an apple and wait...good apple turns into bad apple? Food to worm-food isn't a good vs bad conflict, but the implication (if/then) of form (life) within flow (inception towards death). Ignoring perceivable implication for suggested definitions shapes the conflict.
moral and immoral
Suggested moralism (rules of behavior to follow) tempts one to ignore perceivable MANNER aka manual (life) within automatic (inception towards death), hence in need to manually resist automatic temptation wanted.
Being implies resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death)...others suggest one to ignore resisting by consenting to follow along.
relativism
Only within absolute (inception towards death) can there be relatives (life)...suggested relativism tempts one to ignore that by relating to others (suggestion), instead of adapting to absolute (perception).
main tenant
TEN'ANT, noun (Latin teneo; to strain, stretch, extend)...being implies tenant (life) within main (inception towards death).
satanism
a) Hebrew satan "adversary, to, oppose"...ones consent (want or not want) to any suggested -ism, tempts one into a conflict of reason (want vs not want) aka into opposing others.
b) being reaction (life) within action (inception towards death) implies adverse aka resistance (growth) in adverse of temptation (loss).
go on
If within motion, then the show must go on.
admit
Suggestion tempts ones admission (consent); perceivable goes through each ones perception with or without consent. Suggested (information) tempts one to hold onto; perceivable (inspiration) needs to be let go.
Instead of admitting suggested, try being WIT (to know; to perceive) within NESS (denoting action).
you're either...or...
- From your perspective: "I am whatever you say I am; If I wasn't, then why would I say I am?"
- From ones perspective: "The way (inception towards death) I am (life)"
In short...all is one in energy.
because...
...tempts one to ignore being effect (life) within cause (inception towards death).
man is God
Everything (whole) "was" perceivable; before anyone (partial) within can suggest to one another what it "is".
The more one resists the temptation of wanting to define what "is"; the more one can discern self within everything that "was" before one came to be.
what the satanists want
-IST implies ones consent (want or not want) to suggested -ISM...others suggest -isms to tempt one to ignore perceivable need.
Sometimes there are no signs...
Icons on stage within limelight aka the focus of public attention...a suggested sign-al by the few; sign-ed by the consenting many.
- Manipulation aka MANUS (hand) ATION (action).
- How does one handle action? By reacting (life) to being enacted upon (inception towards death).
- Suggestion represents the hidden hand; tempting one to consent to be handled by others.
I am that hunger
Hunger (inception towards death) consumes (life). Those within decomposition (as partials within whole) need to resist hunger. Consuming one another doesn't stop hunger; it distracts one with appetite (want) from resisting hunger (need).
they say that everything as a whole is
Saying implies suggesting what "is" about what "was" perceivable beforehand...it's on oneself to discern that. Ones consent to suggested permits others to define perceivable with it.
I underline AS A WHOLE.
...which ignores that WHOLE cannot be underlined without adding a line to WHOLE, hence contradicting it.
go beyond good and evil
a) good implies "versus" evil and it's ones consent to either suggested side which establishes the versus conflict of reason within self. Nature doesn't brand anything as good or evil...those within pass judgement in form of labels, which tempts them to ignore that nature implies "justice" aka that which "just is".
b) others tempt one to consent to "be yond" aka YOND, adjective - "mad; furious, or alienated in mind; that is, gone, wandering, and allied to the preceding"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/yond
EVIL DOESN'T EXIST
EVIL/LIVE...LOVE/EVOL. One perceives sound; others suggest words to tempt one to ignore that.
dual
Being implies in-between need (perceivable) and want (suggested). Choosing to ignore need for want establishes a want vs not want conflict of reason within oneself...that represents the foundation for dualism.
Need (resistance) and want (temptation) aren't dual (two), but ones resistance (life) within all temptation (inception towards death).
the cult
- CULTIVATE, verb "to advance the growth of"
That which grows (life) needs to resist that which advances (inception towards death) to grow further.
Elections give everyone their illusion of choice.
Suggested representation tempts one to shirk response-ability (free will of choice) onto others. Others suggest representation to distract one from RE (responding to) PRESENT (presented by) ATION (action) aka from responding to perceivable...not to the suggestions by others.
Ignoring perceivable for suggested establishes illusion aka ILLU (illusive) ION (action)...suggested information deceives one to ignore perceivable inspiration. The former one affixes as a definitions; the latter can't be affixed.
Being implies one apart from one another...others suggest common-ism to collectivize individual consent into mass consensus under few.
The ignored foundation...common (inception towards death) generates special (life).
death is candy
CANDY (to become congealed) aka CONGEAL (to bind or fix with cold)
be gentle with me
Me being (life) within generation (inception towards death); hence well bred (genteel).
this is not a rehearsal
This is not a REHEARSAL (repetition of words; particulars in detail)...it's ongoing sound; whole entirety.
everything you know is wrong
Knowledge cannot be spoken or written down without distracting those within (perception) from the motion of it (perceivable).
my pleasure
MY (claimed by self) PLEASURE (agreeable emotions) aka holding onto emotion (Latin emotio; to move from); while being (life) moved (inception towards death).
voulez vous
Aka "do you want" which suggests others to ignore need (perceivable) for want (suggested).
free pizza
FREE (free will of choice) + PIZZA (from pinza; clamp; that which fastens or binds) aka ones choice to hold onto (want) or let go of (need).
AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee)
AFFA'IR, noun Latin facere; facio, to urge, drive, impel)...being implies private aka separate from one another and urged to resist (life) that which separates (inception towards death).
Others tempt one to COMMIT (to give in trust; to put into the hands or power of another; to entrust) ones consent to their suggestions, which tempts one to ignore the urgency of resisting by oneself.
Public affairs commitment distracts one from private affairs employment.
"Hotez was born in Hartford, Connecticut to a jewish family. His father Edward J. Hotez was a World War II veteran in the United States Navy." ~wiki
"Vaccines Did Not Cause Rachel's Autism: My Journey as a Vaccine Scientist, Pediatrician, and Autism Dad" ~Peter J. Hotez (Author)