Who are we arguing with most of the time?
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
The foundation for arguing/reasoning with others is based on oneself ignoring perceivable need for wanting vs not wanting suggestions by others.
Those already within a conflict of reason are simply seeking more affirmation for their chosen side, hence others exploiting them with repetition of suggested offers. Using a bot for copy/pasting, while adding another layer of revisionism upon the suggested; represents one simply way of feeding temptation to others without exposing self to it aka "don't get high on your own supply".
All of this aside...perception cannot argue with perceivable; only ignore it for suggested. Perceivable moves; suggested tempts one to hold onto.