a) motion brings forward (inception) and retrogresses (death) matter (life).
b) will (want) can only exist within need...one needs to resist want.
c) suggested nihilism (never) tempts one to ignore being advanced within everything. Consenting to nihilism implies holding onto (believing) nothingness, which in return tempts one to denial. Natural order cannot be denied by those within...only ignored.
knowing the difference
Knowledge (perceivable) implies moving differences. One can only perceive moving differences...others suggest sameness (e pluribus unum aka out of many one) to distract one from that.
the difference between healthy and poison
Health (inception towards death) generates sickness (life)...sickness struggles to remain healthy.
Remedy (inception towards death) generates poison (life)...poison dissolves within remedy unless resisting.
sameness (inception towards death) generates differences (life).
good and wrong
Good vs bad and right vs wrong implies one reasoning over suggested, while ignoring implication (if/then) of perceivable.
Take an apple and wait...good apple turns into bad apple? Food to worm-food isn't a good vs bad conflict, but the implication (if/then) of form (life) within flow (inception towards death). Ignoring perceivable implication for suggested definitions shapes the conflict.
moral and immoral
Suggested moralism (rules of behavior to follow) tempts one to ignore perceivable MANNER aka manual (life) within automatic (inception towards death), hence in need to manually resist automatic temptation wanted.
Being implies resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death)...others suggest one to ignore resisting by consenting to follow along.
relativism
Only within absolute (inception towards death) can there be relatives (life)...suggested relativism tempts one to ignore that by relating to others (suggestion), instead of adapting to absolute (perception).
main tenant
TEN'ANT, noun (Latin teneo; to strain, stretch, extend)...being implies tenant (life) within main (inception towards death).
satanism
a) Hebrew satan "adversary, to, oppose"...ones consent (want or not want) to any suggested -ism, tempts one into a conflict of reason (want vs not want) aka into opposing others.
b) being reaction (life) within action (inception towards death) implies adverse aka resistance (growth) in adverse of temptation (loss).
go on
If within motion, then the show must go on.
admit
Suggestion tempts ones admission (consent); perceivable goes through each ones perception with or without consent. Suggested (information) tempts one to hold onto; perceivable (inspiration) needs to be let go.
Instead of admitting suggested, try being WIT (to know; to perceive) within NESS (denoting action).
you're either...or...
From your perspective: "I am whatever you say I am; If I wasn't, then why would I say I am?"
From ones perspective: "The way (inception towards death) I am (life)"
In short...all is one in energy.
because...
...tempts one to ignore being effect (life) within cause (inception towards death).
man is God
Everything (whole) "was" perceivable; before anyone (partial) within can suggest to one another what it "is".
The more one resists the temptation of wanting to define what "is"; the more one can discern self within everything that "was" before one came to be.
what the satanists want
-IST implies ones consent (want or not want) to suggested -ISM...others suggest -isms to tempt one to ignore perceivable need.
a) motion brings forward (inception) and retrogresses (death) matter (life).
b) will (want) can only exist within need...one needs to resist want.
c) suggested nihilism (never) tempts one to ignore being advanced within everything. Consenting to nihilism implies holding onto (believing) nothingness, which in return tempts one to denial. Natural order cannot be denied by those within...only ignored.
Knowledge (perceivable) implies moving differences. One can only perceive moving differences...others suggest sameness (e pluribus unum aka out of many one) to distract one from that.
Good vs bad and right vs wrong implies one reasoning over suggested, while ignoring implication (if/then) of perceivable.
Take an apple and wait...good apple turns into bad apple? Food to worm-food isn't a good vs bad conflict, but the implication (if/then) of form (life) within flow (inception towards death). Ignoring perceivable implication for suggested definitions shapes the conflict.
Suggested moralism (rules of behavior to follow) tempts one to ignore perceivable MANNER aka manual (life) within automatic (inception towards death), hence in need to manually resist automatic temptation wanted.
Being implies resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death)...others suggest one to ignore resisting by consenting to follow along.
Only within absolute (inception towards death) can there be relatives (life)...suggested relativism tempts one to ignore that by relating to others (suggestion), instead of adapting to absolute (perception).
TEN'ANT, noun (Latin teneo; to strain, stretch, extend)...being implies tenant (life) within main (inception towards death).
a) Hebrew satan "adversary, to, oppose"...ones consent (want or not want) to any suggested -ism, tempts one into a conflict of reason (want vs not want) aka into opposing others.
b) being reaction (life) within action (inception towards death) implies adverse aka resistance (growth) in adverse of temptation (loss).
If within motion, then the show must go on.
Suggestion tempts ones admission (consent); perceivable goes through each ones perception with or without consent. Suggested (information) tempts one to hold onto; perceivable (inspiration) needs to be let go.
Instead of admitting suggested, try being WIT (to know; to perceive) within NESS (denoting action).
In short...all is one in energy.
...tempts one to ignore being effect (life) within cause (inception towards death).
Everything (whole) "was" perceivable; before anyone (partial) within can suggest to one another what it "is".
The more one resists the temptation of wanting to define what "is"; the more one can discern self within everything that "was" before one came to be.
-IST implies ones consent (want or not want) to suggested -ISM...others suggest -isms to tempt one to ignore perceivable need.