1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's one dedicated troll. Nothing like referencing a Lion King song to one up someone.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

You mean developing poison they spray us with and put in the so called tests and vaccines which coupled with nutrient deficient and outright toxic GMO food, EMF pollution and psychological stress causes people to get sick en masse? It doesn't roll off the tongue as well as the word "virus" but truth often evades easy definitions.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because the NWO depop cabal says you don't and they make the laws in your country. It's easy. Whoever gives you rights can take them away from you. No one has the right to exist, because one moment you're here and the next you're dead. Your existence is not guaranteed in any way. "Muh rights" is a stupid concept - people have duties - like the duty to defend yourself and your family, the duty to be a good person, to tell the truth, to be informed, to help your neighbor, to stand for what's right, etc. - not rights. Rights are for weak feminized libtards and lolberts raised on western liberal democracy soy-rich diet and masonic lies.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are still not-fake-and-gay ways for them to poison and kill though. Them poisoning the wells is the oldest trick in their playbook.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia write... "I know your works. Look, I have set before you an open door, which no one is able to shut. I know that you have but little power, and yet you have kept my word and have not denied my name. I will make those of the synagogue of Satan who say that they are Jews and are not, but are lying—I will make them come and bow down before your feet, and they will learn that I have loved you."

— Revelation 3:7–9

4
SmithW1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

If what the whistleblower said about Bernie is right, imagine how many children did ol' Joe molest in front of camera to get where he is.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correction: Jews just don't like people who don't preach "anyone I don't like is dead". I didn't catch that. They don't like Christians and think Jesus was a false messiah and a blasphemer. They (the pharisees and sadducees) eventually killed him at the cross and took part in the prosecution of Christians which is told in the NT book of Acts (Paul the Apostle was one of the guys who prosecuted Christians before God appeared to him and straightened him out).

Also I dunno about you but are you aware that there are people who bring literal millennia of death, destruction, rat plagues, starvation and intellectual regression and are still venerated as heroes? There is a reason why there's a medival "dark ages" where all historical records are expunged after the Vatican took over Rome.

Here we go with the dark ages. This term and the idea of the unenlightened medieval ages was coined by degenerate anti-monarchists who fought against the church and wanted to bring about the illuminated Novus Ordo Seclorum. All historical records were expunged? That's simply false. Even if the Vatican destroyed some documents, the Byzantine historians wrote extensively throughout the whole middle ages.

You can reskin those values with things like "God", "Horus", "Stalin" or "Covid-19" and you still cannot mask their true agenda. It's "anyone that I don't like is dead".

I don't see an answer here. Why were the romans cool but the Christians are not? And why do the NWO cabal want to bring down Christianity if they are on the same team?

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't, but people around you will use it. Good luck convincing them the term was invented by the CIA - they'll just laugh it off and say that's exactly what a conspiracy theorists would say.

4
SmithW1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is some Adam Green level of idiocy here. Are you aware jews don't like Christians and outright hate Jesus? Why would they paint Christians favorably and lie about their persecution? But of course Dr CANDIDA Moss is not one of those falsifying history, right?

Guess who's the main opponent to the whole LGBT libtard agenda and who's the main antagonist sticking to traditional values and (based) bigotry according to the NWO stooges? Why is the libtard worldview wrong according to you when it's based on the same secular humanist ideas you'd agree with?

4
SmithW1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

Or just save it by Print -> Save as PDF

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you stupid? I addressed that here:

You are presupposing an already developed rule-based society and that's understandable because one can't even imagine what the opposite would be like apart from devolving into murderous savagery.

Sun Tzu and Nietzsche didn't live in lawless anarchical societies but in highly organized hierarchical societies. Sun Tzu, Machiavelli and modern day intelligence services find ways to game the system and outsmart their opponents. You can't be a great chess player without following the rules of chess.

Wtf geopolitics has to do with anarchy? Warfare is an abstraction. We have warfare because we have societies, that are organized hierarchically the same way an individual is (you have a head, arms, body, etc). In order to get to that level of abstracted aggression we must first observe how aggression is dealt with within society on individual level. Can you defeat a stronger opponent using your cunning? Yes, you can (like King David did for example). But that means in an anarchy you'll always have to be on your guard and ready to defend yourself (or attack) because it's free for all and there's no authority that will prevent or curb aggression.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

No need to apologize at all. Btw I'm Winston Smith writing from the Ministry of Truth. I think you got me mistaken for Will Smith.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

The guiding principle is that we each take responsibility for ourselves. With that in mind, who is there to allow or disallow abortion? If you wish to abort, it is for you to decide.

If that's the case, who's there to allow or disallow rape and murder?

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's not a Christian line of reasoning but I see it could makes sense to pragmatic thinking people. God is the standard for everything that exists, meaning that He cannot be unconventional. He's entirely conventional but we can't know His ways with our earthly limitations. He transcends human wisdom entirely:

"For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, “He catches the wise in their own craftiness”;"

7
SmithW1984 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's just more satanic subversion like the #Jesus washed feet bs. They will push the fake image of cool hippy-jesus and a false gospel like they did for the last 100 years. Nothing to do with real Christianity and our true Lord.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Based. One can only imagine how ridiculous the whole mark of the beast sign must have sounded to people in the past, before digital payments and before implantable chips were a thing. Hundreds of prophesies have come to past and the rest will also come to past and people are still not convinced.

But he said to him, ‘If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rise from the dead.’

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol, I know more about the history of revolutions than you will in your lifetime and you're coming at me with some normie slogans which is supposed to counter what I said? There were rebellions throughout history, but the revolutionary ethos, the overthrowing of monarchies, the social contract, the concept of civil rights, individualism and anarchy itself as a reactionary offshoot from the French commune are all strictly European enlightenment ideas.

Do yourself a favor and read Fire in the minds of man

It's the smart that are able to win in a rule-based society because they can outsmart the rules. In your pipe dream that's not the case and you will get shafted by the stronger guy regardless of how smart you are. You are presupposing an already developed rule-based society and that's understandable because one can't even imagine what the opposite would be like apart from devolving into murderous savagery.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even if a tape is leaked they will say it's doctored. Once more, you just can't prove something that's outside of the paradigm and politicians raping children for blackmail is outside of the normie paradigm for sure.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everyone in position of power has skeletons, that's the point of the whole blackmail op. Bernie plays out his part like a good puppet. He's controlled opposition to Israel.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

What about the Krugman guy? He's named too but why?

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

I understand you want to steer the argument towards "when do we just pull out our guns and shoot each other?" but we don't, because that's degeneracy, not anarchy.

On the contrary. I'm steering the argument towards the most natural thing for a group of people to do - they disagree on things. I'm asking you how do you resolve disputes in an egalitarian system where everyone is his own authority no opinion is more valid than the other? If convincing people worked the way you said it did, we would live in perfect harmony - anarchy or whatever system you pick.

I applaud your pragmaticism but it's naive and things get extremely complicated irl when dealing with people. If I hold one worldview and you hold another there's hardly any convincing that's possible. I'll readily give you an example with believers in God and atheists, I bet you know how this debate goes and how pointless it gets.

True anarchy is not a state of being, it's an ideal to strive for. Of course people are going to end up disagreeing, but then the educated and idealistic rationality and reason of the community needs to stand together, and pull towards the ideal, not devolve into factions fighting over right and wrong. Resolve conflicts with debate, and realize we can't ever agree on everything, but so long as we agree on something, we have grounds for working together.

Does everyone in the anarchy hold that to be true? Now you're talking of the community exercising its will on the minority who's not on board and thus becoming an authority. As in majority rule, as in a democracy. What happens when you have a black or white issue like say should abortion be allowed? Many people are willing to die on that hill so how would we get a compromise?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›