1
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Surely they destroyed any evidence of this before the handover of Twitter took place.

2
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think so, but I'm sure they have paperwork claiming as much.

3
SuicideTruthbomber 3 points ago +3 / -0

In what capacity are they at the G20? It's my understanding that it's a major event with a large number of people filling the various roles. Are they visitors, speakers or something else?

1
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fair advice, but not quite so simple.

What unscrupulous importers do is hire consultants who know a great deal about what things cost over there. Then you set your price so they can make a profit as long as they cut corners on things that would be taken for granted in the country of import (worker safety, environmental regulations, sometimes product safety and whatnot).

3
SuicideTruthbomber 3 points ago +3 / -0

Observers were kicked out in many places. In Atlanta they were lied to so they would just leave.

Observers also had to be far away in many places, sometimes barricades were placed so there could be no line of sight.

Some observers were not allowed to do anything other than sign off on the results even when they objected.

1
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think it's the Clinton criminal empire. Although I believe that Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton was a key player, it was the federal government that was airlifting in all the drugs through that Gulf Coast state during his tenure. The murder victims were a result of that (knowing too much, getting in beyond their depth, talking too much), I think, rather than running afoul of the Clintons themselves.

1
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do the powers that be that overrule USA always put one nation at odds against t he other in cold wars?

That's Henry Kissinger. The idea is triangular diplomacy. It is to discourage any one of the three sides from thinking they could win a war outright, because there would be a dangerous third actor.

Triangular diplomacy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangular_diplomacy

3
SuicideTruthbomber 3 points ago +3 / -0

"effective managers" who order cheapest possible crap from murky resellers, instead of buying from normal suppliers.

I've worked with companies that had huge problems with Chinese-sourced electronic components. They're often counterfeit and usually have difficult to diagnose problems, like not working at certain temperatures or having been previously subjected to electrostatic discharge.

To mitigate this, they set up a verification process that means they have to pay more for certain vendors even when they can externally verify the source.

1
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

There was no heavy shilling

You can't actually believe that.

Are their FEDS online advocating for illegal action?? Yes

I absolutely see that as a form of shilling. First of all, it was their jobs and they were being paid. Secondly, they were doing it to further Deep State political interests.

2
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

Many thanks. I've been pretty busy and I'm completely out of the loop when it comes to the slave trade.

1
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I do not come across as a shill at all. There is nothing in anything I have written that appears that way. Further, I did not post that J6 was from online shilling, but that there was heavy shilling done before the event which indicated to me that the narratives were already in motion beforehand.

1
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know what I saw. Anyway, The protests weren't a show of force, but a show of support. Nice try though.

-1
SuicideTruthbomber -1 points ago +1 / -2

This is mostly a false narrative. The plans for this predated the DC protests. We know because of the online shilling before the fact and the federal agents actually there to foment violence.

1
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

The election fraud was largely in the form of fraudulent counting. That is not to say that illegal activities on the part of government agencies did not occur online, but bear in mind that when people talk about election fraud (not voter fraud) in America, they mean actually falsified results.

by pkvi
2
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

What is the story behind this? Is there some nuance?

1
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have you got any links to or screenshots of any of this?

view more: Next ›