Imagine having a conversation with someone who doesn't understand the meaning of words 🙃
No it's not. It could be whatever they decide it to be. It could a team or a partnership or an adversarial relationship as many marriages are.
society The totality of people regarded as forming a community of interdependent individuals. "working for the benefit of society." A group of people broadly distinguished from other groups by mutual interests, participation in characteristic relationships, shared institutions, and a common culture. "rural society; literary society." An organization or association of persons engaged in a common profession, activity, or interest.
anarchism 1 : a political theory holding all forms of governmental authority to be unnecessary and undesirable and advocating a society based on voluntary cooperation and free association of individuals and groups 2 : the advocacy or practice of anarchistic principles
Because I know society doesn't protect the individual, the individual protects the individual. Superior firepower supercedes whatever government or society one finds oneself in. You realize in America police have no duty to protect you right? Sauce
The US military is an all volunteer force. No one makes people join the military that makes it anarchistic in nature
You don't know anything about psyops if you did you'd know one fundamental goal is to make the subject lose trust in everyone not just specific people
No anarchy is whatever the individual decides it to be
Fuck, you aren't that bright are you?
Having thought about it you are questioning with a false premise that has nothing to do with anarchy. The same could be asked of any system against a "warlord" Do you think being a group of Anarchists would preclude them from forming a collective defense or military?
I can tell you've never been in the military. It's not the generals or the pentagon that run modern militaries, it's the non commissioned officer Corp. What countries did the US military "assume governance" over? Sound like a retard anti anarchy shill to me
Give me an example of someone with a better record than Alex Jones. You are straw manning Alex Jones being wrong and calling it lying with no evidence he actually knew either way. You'd make terrible prosecutor
You just described the US military, genius 🤣 That's what a volunteer army looks like. You are way in the weeds trying to create a false premise of some hypothetical dictatorship fighting anarchists?
So you are talking about a hypothetical dictatorship where exactly? In our heavily armed society? What kind of force are you talking about in the 21st century? Superior firepower? You understand modern militaries have proven themselves ineffective in asymmetrical warfare?
Fear out of weakness
Sounds like fear
It's completely dependent on what the individuals decide, if they believe they have a responsibility then they are responsible. I believe the idea that the strongest naturally asserts themselves a false premise, when it comes to violence It's the person unencumbered by morality that wins. That's why a lot of CEOs are psychopathic and sociopathic. It's the smartest that wins, it's the person that understands violence on a fundamental level not the strongest. I'd use Russia as an example Putin is not the strongest he's just willing to do what his competition will not. There's a difference between strength and ruthlessness.
Most of them aren't really girls 🤢
I don't understand the question. If someone decides to start a dictatorship whose responsibility is it to stop them? Whoever chooses to
A lie infers he knew the truth
Because it doesn't matter whose pulling the strings on the puppet, it's still the puppets signature on executive orders.
Interesting parallel
Or the child hair sniffing or his daughters diary who knows man he's probably got armies of skeletons but our society is extremely capitalistic and wealth equates to fame/power in some fucked meritocracy of greed except for the highest office of the land which undoubtedly can be bought but to actually sit in the chair and be responsible for crashing this bitch into the rocks has gotta be a very unique perspective which may cause suicidal ideation. No way to know, I think it was a fleeting moment of lucidity from his fading mind. It can't look good from his PR teams perspective him talking about suicide with suicides at all time high it's kinda fucked
The conspiracy is how popular culture has made the idea of Anarchism a taboo subject in America. Falsely equivocating anarchy with total chaos and death.
If that's what you took from that I feel sorry for you. What he's describing is winning the highest office in the world, the pinnacle of success for a politician or a person seeking to be one of the most powerful people in the world and saying well it's all down hill from here. That's a very real very personal introspective thought to be unloading on Howard fuckin Stern
"You realize, don’t you, that what’s going on in our country is the collapse not just of an empire, or an economy, but a comprehensive paradigm of human progress. The hallmark of post-war life in Western Civ was supposed to be a return to sanity after the mid-twentieth century fugue of mass psychotic violence. The wish for just and rational order was not entirely pretense. But that was then. Now that we are going medieval on ourselves, the not-so-ironic result will be our literally going medieval, sinking back into a pre-modern existence of darkness, superstition, and penury, grubbing for a mere subsistence in the shadow of scuffling hobgoblins, our achievements lost and forgotten."