a) CON implies "together with"; being implies "apart from".
b) Ones choice selecting chosen ones suggestion permits consensual control.
c) Consent tempts together; resistance sustains apartheid (life) within wholeness (inception towards death)
access denied
Ones perception within all perceivable implies "all access"...suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) and ones consent to de-nial perceivable for it, tempts one to ignore all access, while permitting others to restrict access.
limit reached
Being implies free (choice) within limit (balance); hence inception of being implying "limit reached". Few tempt many to ignore/deny self discernment by consenting to self imposed limits aka "reason".
How to limit "ones choice"? By consenting to "chosen ones" suggestion.
they will
There can be only ones free WILL of choice...plural cannot choose; singular (one) can be tempted to choose suggested pluralism (they).
DEDICATE, verb - "to set apart and consecrate to a divine being" aka perceivable whole setting itself apart into each ones perception within. Meanwhile...a suggested dedication tempts ones vow of consent to another, which ignores perceivable.
Nothing like...
What is nothing like? How could nothing be equal in quantity to anything?
like referencing
Referencing to likeness tempts one to ignore being different from one another.
a) CON implies "together with"; being implies "apart from".
b) Ones choice selecting chosen ones suggestion permits consensual control.
c) Consent tempts together; resistance sustains apartheid (life) within wholeness (inception towards death)
Ones perception within all perceivable implies "all access"...suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) and ones consent to de-nial perceivable for it, tempts one to ignore all access, while permitting others to restrict access.
Being implies free (choice) within limit (balance); hence inception of being implying "limit reached". Few tempt many to ignore/deny self discernment by consenting to self imposed limits aka "reason".
How to limit "ones choice"? By consenting to "chosen ones" suggestion.
There can be only ones free WILL of choice...plural cannot choose; singular (one) can be tempted to choose suggested pluralism (they).
a) TROL implies "troll," which implies you.
Flatline (inception towards death) generates waveform (life)...no circle.
Few suggest many to ignore that for the band of hope aka the leap of faith aka the wheel of fortune aka the circle of life on the path unwinding... https://genius.com/Elton-john-circle-of-life-lyrics
That's one dedicated troll. Nothing like referencing a Lion King song to one up someone.
It's a rogue chatbot
DEDICATE, verb - "to set apart and consecrate to a divine being" aka perceivable whole setting itself apart into each ones perception within. Meanwhile...a suggested dedication tempts ones vow of consent to another, which ignores perceivable.
What is nothing like? How could nothing be equal in quantity to anything?
Referencing to likeness tempts one to ignore being different from one another.