But he looks white. That's why Shaniqua and the brothers in the studio were laughing. What part of him looks non-white to you?
When's the gay vaccine coming up?
The irony is he makes fun of the troons while he himself larps as being of the tribes ethnically.
It will show his ancestors came from Eastern Europe.
I suspect Ben does not think he is White. Because the Jews are Chosen and set apart, and also are the Sons of Chem/Shem, not the Sons of Japheth like "Whites".
Yes, I made that point in another thread. Shem's descendants aren't white but I'm very suspicious of Ben being one of those. He seems like an ashkenazi so he's more likely khazarian with easter and central European ancestry.
Little rat has a point though. Depending on context jews can be considered both white and non-white. This gets even more complex when the definition of "jew" is not very specific too. There's a lot of intermixing going on historically. But it's safe to say this dude is white so Shaniqua pinned him.
According to the Torah, jews aren't white. White people are descendent from Japheth and jews are descendent from Shem.
Musk is an autistic moron and an actor. It's so obvious. He never invented anything in his life.
I bet Trump would say it's a "Judeo-Christian" symbol.
World Wide Web was invented at CERN. It came from Switzerland.
Yeah right, the guy who was instrumental in the creation of the EU was just writing fiction. Next you're going to say the same about Aldous Huxley I bet. They totally weren't part of elite circles that influenced policy. Isn't it curious how those guys predictions of 100+ years have been fulfilled? Such a coincidence.
Population growth stops because kids live long enough to not need replacements in case of childhood death.
Did that make sense to you when you wrote it?
Consent is a modern concept.
Any truth to that? I wonder what the common age of the males were that were marrying 12 year olds?
Yes, this is according to Roman legislation.
In Christian times, women married after puberty - so 14 above. Thus, a woman spent her best fertile years in marriage and not being a thot.
Men married 18-30, mostly in their 20's. This was because men were expected to be well established and to be able to support the household.
The idea about mutual consent has a Christian origin that became more prevalent after 4th c. Nobody before that cared what women thought and marriages were arranged between the men of the families. Child marriages became less common too and the age of marriage of women was raised a bit, especially compared to pagan societies.
Have you noticed how every time "democracy" is exported to a third world country, it inevitably leads to a drop in population growth? Same thing will eventually happen to muslims imported to first world countries. UK won't become an Islamic state and the muslims there won't become englishmen. It's a dialectic that will bring about a synthesis - the new world citizen, who in Count Coudenhove-Kalergi's words will be neither white, nor black but a mongrel race.
I know about castratos. I'm a music composition major. What does people doing something stupid in history has to do with today? Have you heard of eunuchs? This was done way before the castrati and it has nothing to do with trans. Nobody was confused about the sex of these people and they didn't claim to become women. This is retarded.
It's simple - islamisation takes precedence. Their anti-natalist agenda is already doing great given that all civilized countries are below replacment.
Yes I would rather people have personal freedom like the freedom of religion and speech, and people be able to do what they want as long as they aren't violating the rights of others.
Oh, you're libertarian, cool. Why should people care about NAP? What's wrong with violating the rights of others, given that rights themselves don't exist ontologically but are made up social constructs that are subject to change? Is this like your personal preference or is it objectively true that rights should be respected?
You still haven't answered the elephant in the room. Would you kill me in the name of your God if you could legally get away with it?
Wtf does that mean? I wont kill you without good reason of course.
Dude, I've had this argument hundreds of times including on this forum. I'm not in the mood for writing apologetic arguments that will be rejected on principle. It's not worth the investment. Information is out there, I'm not going to say something new. Believe what you want.
Did I address any point of your OP? I'm addressing your comments on meta stuff.
Things are going great in the manner that your Church can't play tyrant over people anymore. Better to have issues and strife and personal religious freedom than live in luxury and be slaves of your cult.
Translation: I'd rather have illuminists talmudic child fuckers who push marxism, feminism and skittles and want to depop, poison and enslave everyone under an one world technocratic government than a Christian monarchy built around Christian values where usury and debt slavery is forbidden, 30% of women are not social media prostitutes and people who believe there are more than two sexes or that pee-pees going into poo-poos is love go to the madhouse (or rather to a monastery to get healed).
Yes. I know that.
Sure thing. If you were good faith, you'd look up an Orthodox source on the matter and not someone who seeks to strawman and undermine the position like you do. You presuppose the Church is corrupt and they made shit up as part of a huge conspiracy. Everything you read will be interpreted through that lens and you twist everything you read to fit your narrative. There's no point in arguing with you.
They're encouraging Islam and arab immigration as fabian socialist have always done. The government itself is malthusian so it's antinatalist. This is basic stuff but you're not interested in reality.
Yes, he's definitely going against Christians, especially those who claim to be the rightful Church.
I'm not bothered at all. I'm just exposing your suspicious activity.
I posted it because you're Orthodox and I thought it would annoy you if I put up how the Orthodox church operates.
You mean I'd be annoyed at idiot Protestant strawmen of what the Church teaches? Not in the slightest. I won't even engage with this stuff.
The conspiracy is that your beloved Church conspired together to gain control over people through spiritual and political means by proclaiming themselves as some kind of divine authority bearing the word of God. That's a pretty big conspiracy. People should hear about how your group operates and learn the tactics to avoid being brainwashed by them or other groups doing similar stuff.
Well, now that the Church is not in control and governments are secular things must be going great in the NWO, right?
Since you're making the story up he might be an alien from Sirius. Your imagination is the limit.
There was no Vatican at his time and neither was there Roman Catholicism. Rulers at that time may have burned and banned books but they also didn't have pride parades, they didn't transitioned their children and weren't getting cucked by invading muslims. I don't think people living today are in a position to criticize those living in the Middle Ages about any of this stuff.
A lot of white people have black hair, especially in the Mediterranean region. He looks Italian.