This isn't one of my alts, I did 1 meta call out post and it was within the rule set. I agree the non-stop infighting is terrible for the forum and probably distasteful to regular users and potential users but that doesn't mean that the whole place is garbage, there is just a lot of garbage to be cleaned up.
This place isn't garbage but it is pretty gross right now..
She did not and she is not.
If it's a new thing and not an error, that would be something to take into consideration I think. Wars and rumors of wars and all that.
I don't understand it, it's like wanting to have your cake and eat it too.
Are you looking for radio silence from me or just no me on your forums? Does the definition of you leaving me alone include you not talking about me?
Is there any potential for reconciliation?
If you don't like talking to me please don't talk about me. That person I chimed Paleo on is a known gore posting pedo that is now sending death threats and we've been dealing with it for 3 years. Me and you can be done but you have to leave me alone then too, agreed?
I was trying to communicate rationally with you, I would like to keep trying. Auto perma bans are to be used sparingly from what I understand but we have quite a few communties going out of their way to ban people they don't like, it's weird and it's petty. Just ignore who you don't like. You aren't the gatekeeper of 'the narrow way' or 'seekers of the way' and alternative views should be allowed for discourse even if the discourse isn't with you.
How strange.
would be nice to have submission statements, eh?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98j5e34dy6o
Seems like escalation to me after a quick look about. Time is a factor for me at the moment but I hope to get back to you on this within 24 hrs. Most likely way less time than that.
Where I come from, always has been. I don't fight with weapons of this world though.
Thanks for the update.
Yes, a conspiracy is still a conspiracy even if it's out in the open, it just moves from theory to fact.
In the event that u/ExpressionOfTheSoul cannot see your reply, and owing to the fact that I'm hoping they would be willing to correct me if I misspeak for them here, perhaps this is a move in an attempt to move on as was previously stated by them and should be respected as a dropping of the conversation.
I haven't prejudged this user I previously chimed and I don't see why it's wrong in the technical sense to say that a user felt a certain way from what I can understand from what they presented to me. I would prefer if the user in question said I misspoke for them.
Depending on the compromise, there are some things I'm unwilling to compromise. I was sincere in apologizing because I realized I wasn't taking him feeling mistreated into account and I was mistaken to do that. I hope u/ExpressionOfTheSoul forgives me sometime.
It is wrong, your definition is lacking was my point.
That's a lazy definition, a lot is missed on that.
How do you define morality?
Already done, keep up bud.
It's usually about God stuff though and I know who God is so I don't care what people think.
Your link doesn't prove your theory. You are seeing what you want to see even after multiple clarifying statements from me.
Consider it a coma?