Subversion is when someone else tries to turn by force, submission is a turning by one's own free will of choice.
If one submits, then a submission has been established...
No subversion is our #3 rule and I've been moderating against it and it has seemed fairly quiet lately after some handshake disrupters were banned.
Let me know if I have missed stuff.
Calling someone agent smith is comparative to calling them a bot and I'm moderating against that, just so you know now.
If you don't know the users why just attack anyone? That's assuming guilt because someone has a different view than you and that is against what we are doing here.
The enemies want us at eachother's throats in the fog of war and we should be able to recognize those on our side even if we don't always agree on everything we can find common ground. Infighting is a design from the powers that be to keep us disorganized and less effective.
Then who is who and what is what?
Pretty sure you've even called me agent smith in the past.
Most of us are all here working against the deep state matrix and name calling diminishes our arguments. I'm trying to follow rule 1 too and I have err'd but I'm renewing my effort.
I disagree.
Not everyone you disagree with is an agent smith.
I am asking for your help here for productive discussion and attacking arguments and not people. I know you can be helpful.
No reason to call people shills either, they show themselves without us name calling.
This isn't reddit and these have always been the rules, it's just been a while since they were enforced. Your help is greatly appreciated.
Please stop calling users agent smith, it is a rule 1 violation: be respectful, attack the argument not the person.
I've given you a very wide berth on this but am now asking you to please stop using name calling tactics. Your arguments suffer for it.
Guess it's a good thing I like camping and leaving society.
Energy lockdowns.. Social crediting resources.. Prison planet.
Highly recommend the book this video is based on: Life 3.0 by Max Tegmark
How would you have had it done?
How has it been a farce?
Do you have notes on moderation?
Perhaps the outcome is the becoming?
Reply to you was removed for rule 1 violation, even tho it was in jest because approving it is a slippy slope.
Argument:
u/ChippingToe; No, there's a light didn't you read op
I'm now thinking you can jest without namecalling, it'll still be funny. But approving would be a slippy slope.
Were you?
Did you know... That woman was also made in the image of her Creator? Thanks for the rib!
Removed for rule 1 violation: be respectful, attack the argument not the person.
Please edit for approval.
Edit: approved because retard is used in jest.
Edit: recursive autonomous learning