This was just more absolute kabuki, and the question to expose that would be something like, "What changed in US policy between this balloon and the last concerning when to shoot things down, and where may I see a dated copy of that?"
PS: This dipshit John Kirby was an admiral. Like a real admiral in the actual US Navy. Tells you a lot about the state of the military.
It's the name for the archive.org site, and what they seek to do is archive information on the Internet. The most fundamental technique is to go around taking "snapshots" of web pages and storing them away. You can go to archive.org, put in a URL, and see if they have any such snapshots. You can also give them a URL and have them archive a snapshot right then.
They also archive other digital information in various forms, and there are various sites with more or less the same mission, like archive.is and archive.ph. The Wayback Machine is the oldest, largest, best known and most popular.
AFAIK, they don't archive YouTube because the volume is too large (and we all know it's 99% cultural battery acid anyway). I'm now in the habit of personally downloading any audio or video content of any possible future importance.
A big problem I've encountered with banned YT videos is that they erase all the "metadata" on the page. That is, if you just have the URL and go to the page, you can't even get the original title to look for it elsewhere. So if you aren't saving the video itself, try to save the title, date, uploader, description, etc, so you can locate it on another site if it vanishes.
What you say is true and it's not necessarily condemnation of archive.org, but then again, thinking critically and conspiratorially, there's no way of ascertaining how compromised they are now or ever will be. For all we know, they are silently wiping away the most sensitive records when they feel they can get away with it. (There are other reports of this.) We can wave our hands around all we like, but the issue still exists.
And again, while I'm sure you're correct about "external legal pressure", who among us was aware of the principle that "external legal pressure" could seek to extinguish knowledge from the face of the Earth? The old Fetzer article I was looking for had nothing at all to do with Sandy Hook or any other legal issue. How could it possibly be subject to any legal injunction not just on Fetzer, but on a completely separate legal entity?
So we see clearly the real problem: Can we see somewhere defined the limits to the existence of information through "external legal pressure"? I was completely unaware that such a mechanism existed, or could exist, or would be tolerated. But the main strength of most of "Their" techniques lies in lack of awareness, and so here I sought to bring it to mind.
A classic lecture on the Sabbatean-Frankists. Stunning that they left it up:
Barry Chamish - 1666 Sabbatean Frankism (Hidden Jewish History) (YT 40:13)
I guess with 59 views in 7 months, they know no ones watching anyway.
People interested in the fake death thesis may find some useful evidence here:
Elvis Aron Presley: Intelligence Project (31-page PDF)
I only made it a page into Hersh's substack before I realized it was sickening limited hangout. I only made it one more page before I just couldn't continue.
Let me hasten to say that, yes, the US did it. But everyone already knows that. This just adds a bunch of colorful detail. I'm certain Sy was just handed that info in return for an "acceptable" writeup.
Seriously, can any thinking person believe that the US military lacked the capability or the will? Does all that detail actually add anything to our understanding? Okay, they used C4 and not C3 or C5. Who cares?
The point of it was the message, "Putin and Russia are soooo bad, Biden had to be bold enough to take out the enemy's pipes before they could be used against the world. These brave warriors owed Europe that much." You swallow that along with all the cool Navy diver sugar coating. (Hey, did you know they're based in Florida and have a big swimming pool?)
That message is, of course, patently absurd. Hate Putin and don't want to fill his war chest? Don't buy gas from him. Fearful Putin is going to extort Europe by threatening to turn off the taps? The US blew the taps to pieces!
Is anyone going to have to go have a meeting with HR and their supervisor over this? Not a chance, so it's not much of an admission. I cannot believe Hersh doesn't see this. Maybe they just wrote it for him and venmo'd him some bux.
For further evidence, Monkey Werx analyzed the flight of the P-8 in his podcast:
SITREP 10.3.22 - The HAAWC Missile System - If it looks like a duck! (YT 36:36)
Don't be thrown off by the "HAAWC Missile" reference. He makes clear that element is only speculation
We're in such deep waters, and very murky.
I was actually going to mention Bannon as part of that "pay"-triot crew, but then I thought, "I'm sure there are some fans around and Steve has been bringing some good stuff to the fore, controlled op though he may be in the end. Don't want to put them off."
(We somewhere have to keep in mind that Trump booted him out of the WH. To my mind, that indicates Trump discovered a snake in the grass, but other interpretation will vary WIDELY.)
Same thing with Gateway Pundit: they come to the fore after 2020 with tons of good content. But over time they seem to have huge blind spots with Israel and Russia cleaning out Ukraine. Let em throw in here James Corbett, a guy I've followed for many years, who seems to have huge blind spots with Trump and Russia. How to interpret all this?
As I make see it, lots of sheep have jumped the fence over the past few years. As any good shepherd knows, you don't corral sheep from behind and yell at them to come back. You must get out in front of them.
So to make sense of this, they have to get their disinfo agents back out in front, and they must use valuable info to do that. So they activated sleeper Corbett and they even ended up burning his associate Sibel Edmonds. They're desperate.
But there are still the red lines they have not yet crossed. Israel is their base of power, which took so so so long to set up. But now there is open mention of civil war and they may yet sacrifice that too. Now Russia has become an existential threat. Even with Ukraine, the jewel of NATO in Europe, they cannot resist it physically. And I believe Putin waited until "They" no longer had control of nukes before he moved. But they try to resist the RF and the Multipolar World Order in all other ways.
Miles Guo brings up the other existential threat to them. You can see asset Guo flipping out about Xi here. As summarized:
SS: Miles Guo: Xi Jinping will purge the CCP, exploit and slaughter the Chinese people, and destroy the world by launching the “Dangerous Storm and Self-Revolution”, which will be the biggest threat to the entire human race.
In fact, Xi did purge the CCP, but what he purged it of was Cabal operatives. So we see again why They are getting so desperate.
Well this ended up quite wordy! Not that it will persuade you of anything, but these are just the pieces as I have arranged them on the table for myself.
Yeah, I've found that everyone ends up believing what they want to believe. The true manipulation lies in getting people to want to believe certain things, and they will themselves fill in everything after that as required. Few can escape this technique.
The sad part is that if he goes through with it, regardless of what he says the guy that gave us "The Wall" is going to be accused of "carrying water" for a dictator.
Worse, all the liberal fans of Pink Floyd won't stop for two seconds to reconsider whether they're on the right side of this.
Yeah, that's a good example of one of the highly forced and ludicrous explanations given for these passages.
... “he was higher than any of the people from his shoulders and upward.” Saul’s physical appearance was accentuated when he stood. Could it be any clearer, friends? Is it so difficult to see? Israel’s King Saul was a very tall man!
So we're supposed to believe this is how the Israelites would describe a tall person? One may compare to Deuteronomy 9:2, describing giants:
A people great and tall, the children of the Anakims, whom thou knowest, and of whom thou hast heard say, Who can stand before the children of Anak!
I encourage everyone to look at the various translations of 1 Samuel 9:2 that contain the word "head", and note that that word is not in the original Hebrew.
When you scrape away the psyop and all its shills, you still find what seems a great number of ordinary people who lack the level of consciousness with the power to think up such experiments for themselves. Worse, they seem to fail to possess the concept that such a thing can or even should be done.
I personally find that far more alarming than finding out I was wrong about the shape of the Earth.
I didn't know anything about his work, but I had heard it mentioned once he was controlled op (then again, you're no one unless someone says that about you.) A couple of months ago I finally got around to listening to an interview. It took about 20 minutes before he finally tipped his hand.
I recall it was something about Q. He claimed to have known the originators and proceeded to describe their intent. He was incorrect, rewriting history. Even if you thought Q was a giant psyop, there's no reason to lie about it and perhaps every reason not to.
Posobiec is one of the latest wave of "pay"-triots rolled out just after the 2020 Selection: Sidney Powell, Mike Flynn, Stew Peters, Jovan Hutton Pulitzer, etc. They say many true and important things, and almost all conspiracists cannot see through them.
But then that's exactly what we would expect, is it not?
Did you look at the ticketing information? It's rather unusual.
Lectures are given to an audience of approximately 675 subscribers in the Stark Theatre. Annual Series subscriptions cost $400 per person for the Stark Theatre Main Stage and seats are limited.
A maximum of 675 people would not know he was there. Or they might have simply cancelled the event by email, and then a maximum of 675 people would have to see the video, realize it was fake, and post somewhere about it.
Call me a conspiracy theorists, but I believe it's DeepFaked. It seemed that way from several clues, but browsing down to a few of the replies, I quickly found one saying, "where is this at? i did not hear he was in town" from a guy in Vero Beach.
If one is inclined to believe this article, then "They" are free to pin whatever they please on Mattis, if it helps deflect from the truth:
Military Charges Jim Mattis with Treason, But He’s Fled the Country (RRN 1/30/2023)
Svoboda was originally the Social-National Party of Ukraine, and evidently their CIA case officer didn't tell them they were supposed to be fake National Sociialists.
"They" have been holding this card for at least a century. John Dewey (of "Decimal System" fame) was one of "Them".
Some one remarked that the best way to unite all the nations on this globe would be an attack from some other planet. In the face of such an alien enemy, people would respond with a sense of their unity of interest and purpose.
I would note this as yet more proof that "They" possess very low powers of creativity (not an insult, a real observation).
As a twist and an elaboration to the story, we can begin with a comparison of Yuri and Neil: Neil Armstrong was Yuri Gagarin --- NASA HOAX (YT video included at link)
They are obviously extraordinarily similar, but I would agree with several of the redditors that they are not the same person. I would suggest that they are twins or clones. It turns out that twins crop up all the time in Intelligence ops, from Eva Braun to Tiger Woods' wife.
The twist I would propose is that after his first flight, as he gained more international attention, it was decided that his appearance was a little too obviosly similar to Neil's. The solution was an "accident" that gave him the prominent scar through his eyebrow. Eyebrows are a big factor in recognizing faces.
This is all to indicate that the manipulation and deception go back farther and deeper than, "Hey, we went to space/the moon! Trust me, bro!"
Turns out it's specifically Satan, but that's a long story.
Here's one part of the story, though, where people get thrown off the trail: Baal (or Ba'al or Bel or Beel, etc) is usually translated as "lord". It also has the connotation of ownership, so a fuller translation might be something like "lord and master".
While this is just a title or descriptor and could apply to anyone--or any deity--in all my research I've only only come across one or two instances where I thought it might not be referring to Satan. But then, I also suspect that with deeper research I would have been able to make the connection.
So a "faraway" connection would be something like "Beelzebub" is really "Baal zevuv", usually translated "Lord of the Flies". This probably should be "Lord of the Flyers", and refers to Satan being the head of a faction who possessed flying vehicles.
In burial grounds containing longheads, they are often segregated, with finer clothing and better grave goods. I have no information on how thicc they were.
Interestingly, at that time in Israel there had been no Elites at all until shortly before David. He was only the third king. The first, Saul, only became king after the Israelites insisted Yahweh appoint one.
In between the two was a mysterious character named Eshbaal (<-- whaaaat?).
Just an off-topic observation on what does and what does not get through into different people's consciousnesses.
Col. MacGregor obviously has a superior knowledge of history, particularly concerning military matters. How then is it possible that this has escaped his studies?
Up to the morning of December 7, 1941, everything that the Japanese were planning to do was known to the United States….
-- Top Secret Report of Army Pearl Harbor Board (October 20, 1944)
Of course, the Harriman anecdote I read as just another item in the overall BS narrative. And I discount that MacGregor is part of a vast disnfo Pearl Harbor coverup.
Maybe the colonel is just not paranoid enough.
You're correct, it was totally fake. What is always so odd is what they will openly admit to in the mainstream. From her wiki:
The science is in, eh?
Side note that you didn't see coming: I stumbled on confirmation that Anthony Bourdain was one of Them.
His followup book to Kitchen Confidential was--very bizarrely: Typhoid Mary: An Urban Historical. WTF, right? This is part of the pattern that They use Their assets and projects to support other of Their assets and projects. (That's why we should always keep our red string handy.)
This goes along with the other evidence against him: Asia Argento, his strange death, suspected son of Leonard Cohen, etc.